Wing Chun teaches itself to those who listen and are sensitive enough to learn. But one must have a good teacher to learn chi sao properly and without force.

Brian Matlock its because its easier to learn "retain centre" first then "moved around opponents centre" first first you control your centre then you learn to move off it the other way around will leave you stuck moving off centre when you're suppose to keep it

Brian Matlock The only other art i would recommend is kali because the hand motions are equialent and very natural for open hand, knife, sword and stick. It is also offensive where wing chun and aikido are defensive arts that use the opponents energy against them. Not a knock on wing chun or aikido but a trained boxers will inflict ALOT of damage too on any art due to the barrage and precise nature of that art. Ultimately, the masters all seem to converge on the same understanding irrespective of the path chosen.

ZFlyingVLover aikido throws can knock you out and a strong enough wing chun combo should be able to quickly, boxing is no better at ko then aikido nor wing chun

+ZFlyingVLover While I'd certainly agree with you in the case of Aikido, Wing Chun actually doesn't have a huge bias towards offence or defence. I tend to find it adapts quite well to either role, depending on what you want to do, since when used offensively you can rely on your training to block when needed, leaving you free to move in and attack your enemy. Wing Chun can actually be pretty vicious when attacking. I will agree with boxers though, they can be a pain. There are ways around them though, and at the very least my school teaches some techniques specifically to help deal with boxers, since they are a recognised danger (given that I live in the UK). At the very least, they're not a danger until they get to a decent level too, so it really depends on how much training each person does. xD

I just now realized aikido uses a frontal stance, to maximize their grabbing, pulling and pushing leverage. Right off the bat it made me think of wing chun, because they too prefer to keep their stance the same, but for different reasons. There are some very great similarities between the stances, I wish this video had translations though, just to get the finer points across. Still watched the whole vid, says a lot on its own.

this is just a mix of both

ShavDance yea dude I speak from experience go master both and then come & tell me

+Ralicx Gaming yea dude, go learn russian and then tell me

If you were really a "master of both" you'd say that Wing Chun is a redirection of force. All martial arts are for self defense and only meant to be used when necessary. Wing Chun is based on techniques designed to defend yourself against attackers that are bigger than you, hence its creator is a woman.

The Last Sifu both are last resort meant only for self defence and many martial arts are made by females. Both arts are amazing but should not be used for provoking others.

yes, you are right. Yuri Kormushin(Wing-Chun master) tells that it is almost impossible to catch opponent's arm when he is striking in classic aikido, and Wing-Chun sticky hands technique helps in this case)

Everything makes more sense now, as i watch the video again, thanks man! =)

Yeah it's called tactile Reflexes. A Importent cornerstone of wing chun.

maybe it would be better if you practice directly with the experts not online (only opinion)