The low-wage response to this requirement is to throw more bodies at the problem. A continuous line of men carrying sacks, for example. What we have here looks more like a non-engineer's engineering solution; especially given how that container's bottom failed to seal properly after discharge.

​@@peaceraybob àaà aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaà

​@@stevesharpe174A for effort sir, and I mean that; but youre at least ten years too late with a post that long. Anybody that can read that all the way to the end probably doesn't need it explained to them; and everybody that needs that explained to them can't process a five word tl;Dr; much less a well thought out multi paragraph tome like that.

I mean plus the addition of the pulley system and the corresponding box-section reinforced floor..

It’s actually a pretty good idea. A lot easier that unloading a standard wood trip trailer than using a conveyor to get it on the ship.

many times importing stuff is much more expensive then a couple of workers hours

Open top containers are quite common.Mostly used for shipping high machinery that can’t fit in through the doors.

@@stefanp7603 dty

@@ianwallace16 yes open tops are somewhat common. But I’m not sure I’d trust the pad eyes they welded on to lift these. And the doors on the bottom were bent on that one we saw. Doesn’t give me great confidence.

This is a ISO standard shipping container, there are many hundreds of shipping container types that are different from the normal box containers. This is just one of those obscure types.

@@fluggaenkoecchicebolsen yes open top are a thing however containers with a open top and a floor are not standard ISO containers here in this video its clear that this is a container that has been modified so the floor opens it seems to be a common solution in that area because of the crane attachment

Hahahahaha...😁😅

I just saw this now. This is so inefficient might as well use a shovel. Hell NO LOL

👌😂🤣

@@bentleymtafu23 Hauling in NZ . kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nZNyodqqp7GZeJ8.html .Classic Chip trucking. 39 tons kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ga16h9phnN-2dps.html .2020 chip haulage. 57 tons. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p7dmorOi2ci2oX0.html . NZ-Timber trucks 150 tons

@@bentleymtafu23 it’s actually not to bad when compared to other chip facilities. Usually they lift trucks w/ trailers to 45 degrees and dip the trailer. Then the conveyor takes it to the ship. Or to a pile in the yard then to the ship later. It’s not a fast operation either. If you don’t have room for the regular operation then this isn’t that bad efficiency wise. I just don’t trust the modification made to the containers to be safe for lifting. But that’s just me.

There are three types of people in the world - those who can count and those who can’t

@@ArtStoneUS 😆😂

Third type: one who makes it efficient, but shows to his boss that he is still doing it manually just to sleep around.

There is in fact a theory (or law) to the explanation of the 2nd one attitude. It is called "Parkinson's Law".

@@ArtStoneUS There are 10 types of people in the world - those that understand binary and those that dont.

Thanks, saved me the figuring time, now just for fun...imagine particles one billion to a millimeter packed side by side and filling completely a cube shaped (to simplify things) universe of a trillion light years per side...I appreciated your comment and it made me think of how often I see horrible "arithmetic" errs in news reports. Cheers

Your calculation is correct my friend. Container instead of conveyor is stupid and risky

Like a lot of jobs, or trades, you tend to only hear about the bad ones.

Next ships the glue

😂😂 my thoughts exactly

@Huxley Jax if your insecure don't be in a relationship!

@Huxley Jax No, nobody cares. I wonder when are they going to start banning bots from this site. Lots of gullible people will attempt to use that only to find out that their own account credentials have been stolen. Be aware.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

ে

Yes, high risk for crane operators but he can do it without fail. Many vessel calls were handled already.

Haha... now they are loading in backyard better than before by excavator i/o ficken shovels. FYI pls: 1 gang they are doing this way but the rest gangs they’re using loading conveyors

@@truonglinh78⁴

True but this way they have a general cargo dock and not a dedicated bulk dock. So the dock can be used to import export multiple commodities.

Not every Port has a conveyor belt system. Maybe their main cargo is general cargo?

@@vorpommerinaustralia5418 Dude, obviously no one is talking about using this system for TVs, appliances and other "general cargo".

@@BlenderRookie Yeah, but that’s your mistake. If they handle bulk only once a year, it’s cheaper to use once a year this unefficient loading method and pay more laytime instead of installing a expensive conveyor belt. I don’t deny that you are right in general.

You would have to train these clowns to do that also, different person every day, and yes looks like it takes for ever.👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸

@@bohhica1 Hauling in NZ . kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nZNyodqqp7GZeJ8.html .Classic Chip trucking. 39 tons kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ga16h9phnN-2dps.html .2020 chip haulage. 57 tons. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p7dmorOi2ci2oX0.html . NZ-Timber trucks 150 tons

A conveyor system sounds nice but how do you get it off the truck?

Похоже на самоделку. Выгнуло сильно люки и щепа сыплется мимо.

Есть вещи, которые кажутся невозможными, но мы можем сделать это с помощью безумных идей, которые возможны.

Just correct your calculation: 40’HC ~ 76m3 takes 6,2 minutes => 12.25 m3/ minutes ==> Crane productivity = 735,5 m3/ hr At current location, MC (moisture content) 50%, average Woodchips Ratio 3.12 m3 lv/t ==> Crane Productivity = 235,7 Green tons (GT)/hrs, it means 5640 GT/ day Handling Productivity is so slow by this kind of container. Loading conveyor system with at least 400 GT/ hr (~ 9600 GT/day) is a better solution, not only for loading productivity but also for trimming cargo on vessel holds

@@truonglinh78 Thanks for the correction, .........I agree a conveyor is a better solution, ...........but sometimes you have to go with what you have.

Many lessons learned from this operation! But it should be applied for some special scenarios.

@@truonglinh78 ☕🥂

Safety first ;)

@@henkstersmacro-world No, that's not what they wrote. That might be what they meant, but you need to actually watch the video..

@@xz3693 Idd you're right, I was mentioning what the original text would have been but it seems that someone messed up the text..

Nope. Have only the suggestion, that it might be "Safety" in English and in the local language - i.e. Thai, or Hindi. Same lettering as on the lower part of the container doors. But... Dunno. 😉

Just a bit faster 😂

Average 20=>22 tons/ container depending on the moisture content of woodchips 🪵

~ 2000 conts for full load of vessel with 35-40k MT, but the Terrminal had done by 2 modes: loading conveyor & OTOF cont. for high productivity. Korea/ Japan is target location.

@@truonglinh78 Thanks for you response. 🙂 Damned lot of work!

You are correct. Many safety, productivity issues have to be reviewed since Woodchips loading by this specific OTOF container. But now, it’s still be done since some limitation at the ports & consolidated.

country is Vietnam.

i think a bunch of guys with shovels might be a small bit worse, but yea its not the most efficient way of doing it

Cam Ranh, Vietnam

Caused by: 1. Trcucking cost from highland to seaport 2. Loading cost at port by none-specific loading equipments with low productivity.

You would think a huge vacuum or conveyor would be faster.

Yes, you’re correct. Thanks for your sharing.

Yeah looks slow as shit

Yeah seriously they can't be loading that ship one container at a time

Are you Woodchip Expert?

@@vivacehome1 woodchip expert ?? to see that this is not a way to load a ship ? just comon sence but you are a woodchip expert so be happy.

Mechtilda, you worded that perfectly for me .. thank you.