How this called in UE? How do I google it?

@@barulicksama3838 It's called "CameraOffset", plugging it to World Position Offset will push the vertices forward to the camera while retaining the perspective scale. For best results, the eyebrow and eyelash cards must have their own material slots, and not part of the skin texture.

@@MakotoIchinose thank you very much for your response.

Goes to show how far behind the curve the switch hardware and software is

@@grantsnyder3250 we know. yet somehow there are more games i want to play on switch than any other console right now but also: it’s a smart visual technique that doesn’t really say anything about the hardware? the eyes and eyelashes look good for the anime style they’re going for.

He's a man of culture for sure

Dude is top notch 💯

Yeah, John is great. I’m sick of other people always saying “this switch game is awesome, I wish it wasn’t crippled by the switch.” While I totally understand and I wish the switch had a little more power to offer too, I think it’s more impressive to get something like XC2 and XC3 running on the hardware it has and I think John agrees seeing the little tablet stretch it’s legs is way cooler.

They would be perfect for Golden Sun.

This is a great idea, Monolith is perfect for this!

Oh please please please someone make this happen

I want them to do F-Zero or Wave Race. Basically just give me -Zero or Wave Race Nintendo!!!

@@SBandy Shin'en Multimedia would be probably the best people for F-Zero and Wave Race. Fast RMX looks amazing and reminds me alot of F-Zero.

I encourage you to check out FF7 Remake. The eyes are leagues better than XBCX. They move and look so much more realistically and in ways the WiiU and Switch just can not handle. Absolute eye candy.

@@robwaters8848 You sound ridiculous. Yes, subtle eye movement is just way too complex for the Switch to handle. (snicker)

@@davidaitken8503 What are you criticizing? Are you just bored and instigating? Because there wasn't anything even moderately controversial about what I said. I have no idea what provoked you.

@@robwaters8848 You claimed the eye effects in FF7 Remake are being done in a way that a less powerful system like the Switch can't handle. I somehow doubt Square is devoting a significant amount of processing power to eyes of all things. That isn't to say the eyes don't look impressive in FF7 Remake but the idea that the diminished processing power of the Switch couldn't handle something that isn't taking up a significant amount of processing power to begin with is absolutely ridiculous. That was the point I was snarkily making. It's less an issue of processing power and more an issue of Square obviously putting in a ton of effort to make the eyes photo realistic. Obviously, doing so is more practical as well when you aren't rendering such enormous and highly populated locales either. The two games have very different designs in that way. That would be like comparing the character models in Resident Evil 4 on Game Cube and the character models in Grand Theft Auto San Andreas on PS2 and concluding that the PS2 couldn't handle the detail. Sure. The resolution and texture detail were significantly toned down, and the realtime cinematics had to be displayed as FMV, but they pulled off Resident Evil 4 on PS2. The reason for less detail in GTA San Andreas was due to how much bigger the maps were more than the PS2 having less processing power than Game Cube. Does this better clarify things?:)

Recient Atelier games have added the eye movement, and that alone adds a lot of life to the characters.

Crazy times

I second this!

Lol no way was xenosaga the best looking game on the PS2!!!! maybe it was THEIR best looking game but the title has many other titles in front of them for that spot lol lil dookie!

Xenosaga Episode 3 was never, at ANY point, the best looking game on the PS2. You just didn't play the best looking games on PS2 and you thought your favorite game was the best looking one. PS2 had Okami, which still has some of the best graphics ever created to this day. Top 5 easily. And there's at least 30 to 40 games on PS2 that looked better than Xenosaga Ep 3. Stop spouting nonsense, please with no technical knowledge of anything.

Xenosaga 3 was ,and still is a technical marvel !

Well ps2 was the weakest hardware that gen. Same with ps1. The Sony ponys always forget that

What's the name of the music playing at 11 minutes? I luv it

@@caiqueseren6440 'first meeting' by Yuki Kajiura to be heard in Xenosaga 2.

For real! I wish those Xenosaga games would get some remake love. Maybe Monolith is waiting for better 4K-capable hardware?

@@SolKnightt square enix owns the rights to them, not monolith so they can't make the remake unless they get handed it by square

There are a few connections ever so slight and including KOS-MOS as bonus/secret character, but they are pretty separate, especially in gameplay.

@@ramonandrajo6348 why are you spamming this comment all over, why

@@alvinanis3006 To be fair i am curious what the emulated experience will be with 60fps and with 4k

Honestly they should just let monolith develop open world pokemon under the control of gamefreak with enough development time like how they help with first party Nintendo titles

I dunno, based on what modders have been able to do with XBC2 on the Switch. They weren't too technically minded. Switch games never push the Switch hardware, I don't know if this is something Nintendo forces on developers or what.

@@ThisisCitrus modders were also increasing the frequency clocks of the CPU and GPU to achieve this higher fidelity anyway, so those games are indeed pushing the Switch.

@@ThisisCitrus Well, they also have to be concerned about battery life I guess. If they push the Switch hardware way too much the battery life will suffer and it will kill the whole purpose of having this game on a portable console. I don't know why wouldn't they do it on docked mode though.

@@ThisisCitrus XBC2 was rushed, only 40 developers worked on it with the help of outsourcing. The engine of XBC2 is unoptimized, it’s evident when playing for longer sessions. Memory leaks and glitches are the result of an unoptimized engine. Also, XBC2 was developed in only 2 years after XBCX which came out in 2015. Overall, XBC3 looks like Monolithsoft pushed the Switch to its limits in terms of optimization and scale.

@@deredere-sama5995 Yup, one day Nintendo won't be trash and let their games be on PC. XBC2 on Yuzu emu was amazing, fixes every issue with the switch version.

fake news, the game don't look good in regular gameplay.

@@chucho224 Hey KZfaq! You seriously need to crack down on these stupid Trollbots.

How are you sure they dont?

@@sergeantworteltjes4510 Interviews

@@sergeantworteltjes4510 they conscicely laid out thier cycle and development process in interviews.

@@sergeantworteltjes4510 interviews and direction. Like nintendo bought monolith with the condition of not touching their development except when needed (like Mario Club)

@@sergeantworteltjes4510The fact they expedited the release date suggests they were well ahead of schedule and were playing a release date safe. Plus the fact they announced only less than half a year before its actual release date and a bit more for its originally announced release window helps from external public demand to see a game, compared to more infamous examples like The Last of Us Part 2 or Cyberpunk 2077.

I hate that so many games sacrifice performance to sustain battery on Switch. The Steam Deck is successful with most games getting like 2-3 hours battery, feels so misguided considering how much the hardware is bottlenecking games at this point

@@PantsaBear In contrary, it shows their dedication on what's most important to them.

@@trixniisama would be great to have n option in the settings tho Plenty of games do this on consoles and even smartphones now.... There's no excuse

Xenoblade 2 use 302 MHz so 384 is a much needed increase

@@PantsaBear I'd say, in console-cases, games with severe performance issue are caused by the development team's fault, not the hardware. I mean the target hardware is the same, the spec is static. Developers should know the hardware very well (by now) and craft the game specifically to play well on those hardware, rather than to make the best game possible and hope that it can run.

Indeed, now if only the Nintendo fanbase gave this game the same level of support they are going to give Zelda or gave to even disaters like Pokemon Scarlet/Violet...

Tears has the same graphics as breath. It just has insane physics which eats cpu

Is TOTK that much better looking than BOTW? THEY look like the same at first glance.

​​@@randybobandy9828 the same. Totk is just a bit upscaled. Btow looked blurry compared to totk.

Nothing runs well.

@@ramonandrajo6348 broke

@@ramonandrajo6348 bruh

@@ramonandrajo6348 you just self-reported yourself LMAO I play on PC and switch 💀

@@ramonandrajo6348 ha you're broke

@@ramonandrajo6348 Man only has one response

It’s looks fine in portable. Looks better than xc2. Character model look sharper but the background looks abit blurry.

It’s super interesting that monolith soft has improved in every entry in portable mode. X2 wasn’t really that good, but when xenoblade chronicles definitive edition came out, it fixed a lot of its previous games issues. This one seems to be another step up!

I really enjoyed xc1 on N3ds. 😅

@@dnegel9546 hey as long as you enjoyed it!

​@@TheKamiguy MCLASSIC PLUG-AND-PLAY make the visuals even better;)

I am not them, but I would say probably Horizon Forbidden West on ps5. It still happens but I rarely notice it. Will be interesting if it gets improved even further on pc. Another game would be Crysis Remastered maxed out where I don't think you will ever see pop in, but the performance really takes a hit that imho is not worth it and was there more to play into the meme of crysis being hard to run.

Please play the others in the series if you like it!

The others are worth your time as well, nothing quite like it when it comes to the story

I think it´s a must-have for a switch owner

Xenoblade X needs a port . That game was awesome. Almost worth picking up a Wii U for it

@@Reynsoon I'll just watch all the cutscenes of the other games I don't jump into a franchise blind i never do KH i started from the beginning and this no exception however I'll just watch the cutscenes and get this game. Is that alright?

Cutscenes alone are absolute God-tier 🔥

Nice. I liked aspects of it on the Wii U but did not really like how objectives were not clearly shown for the main mission path and the emphasis on using the Wii U gamepad to uncover a certain percentage of the map. Is the third one more clear about the main path? Does it require uncovering a percentage of the map? What about the second game? That was the main reason I havent played after that entry.

I would if I didn't have to play at terrible resolutions and horrible textures on a dated system. The devs did an amazing job but the limitations of the switch can't be surmounted

As much as I love the Xenoblade series, I think games like Vagrant Story, Final Fantasy Tactics, Suikoden I and II have better world building and narratives. I’m going to wait a bit before playing XBC3 because it will sink too many hours and I have a backlog to catch up on 😂

@@theconsolekiller7113 They have come a LONG way since the Wii U one in terms of simplifying travel and quest tracking. XC2 has a lot of similar issues with a bad map and quest tracking system, but XC1 Definitive Edition made some massive improvements and XC3 seems to have taken it even further. There is now a feature you can turn on and off that will guide you directly to your main quest or side quest. And the map seems to finally be a very modern map that works as you'd expect in a modern open world game. Obviously I haven't played it but based on footage and the reviews it seems like that shouldn't be an issue.

@@Silvergun_Raven That's fair, those are all amazing too!!

it's called 'A life Sent On'

I'm sorry to tell you this but we've pretty much had the full version of the song since February when it was ripped off the games website

Sounds like every other flute song to me lol

@@prototype8137 Thats like saying Ed Sheerans "Shivers" sounds like every other radio song.

@@The_Ostrich never heard of it, and dont listen to pop music or him but many pop songs do share traits such as notes/ chords, progressions, timings, bpms, etc.

Yeah, what i liked the most about XC2 was how dense and rich the environments felt... 3 looks more barren in general... not that I'm complaining... it helps the narrative, but there's no denying that theres a noticeable difference jn that regars

I would say that XBC3 has higher overall texture resolution and more geometry than XBC2. XBC3 has way bigger landscapes and more verticality. Gormott in XB2 was quite "dense" in terms of foilage (I wish more of XBC2 was as lush as Gormott). I loved both games either way... maybe XB2 a little more.

I loved the photorealistic leaves and minor environment details mixed with more artistic assets in 2 tbh

yes 100

MCLASSIC PLUG-AND-PLAY also;)

yea i love how mushy and blurry the game looks makes me feel like im back in 2003

@@_CrimsonBlade Yah best looking Gamecube game I ever seen very technologically advanced for something that looks around 8 to 10 years old.

@@theninjamaster67 damn 0 appreciation for the technology achievements here :/ brother thinks the switch is as powerful as the ps5

@@beak4996 No I think the Switch is as powerful as a tablet from 2015 and that my phone could run this shit at 60fps easy. (Skyline emulator ftw)

I'd highly recommend playing through the first two first. The stories are excellent, specifically the 1st. It's a wild ride. Just get the Definitive Edition on the Switch. As for the 2nd, it's really good however the story is enhanced if you have played the first game. This game will be greatly enhanced if you've played the first two. If you do decide to do this, welcome to the series. It's a great franchise that really invests you.

@@Jaekization Can I start with the third one? Does the story of the first two matter? My gaming time has become scarce.

@@BSC1992 you could start with anyone you choose, really, but the context of some things and the scale of it all would be lost on someone who only plays one

As someone who has completed all prior games in the series multiple times each and has currently sunk 60-ish hours into Xenoblade 3, I can safely say this is by far the worst game in the franchise. Unless something drastically changes within the second half of the game, It's a definitive step down from the previous games in practically every regard. Each of the previous games had a similar level of overall quality. Certain titles excelled in differing fields than others. For instance, Xenoblade 1 has by far the best and most likable main cast in terms of their characterization/development. Xenoblade X has the most robust and satisfying gameplay mechanics particularly relating to combat and character builds. X also has the best graphics by a pretty wide margin, but the art style is pretty divisive since it attempts to go for a more muted, realistic vibe than the rest of the franchise. Many fans also consider X's narrative delivery to be the weakest, but personally I disagree. Story is definitely less of a focal point overall though. Xenoblade 2, on the other hand, has the best story by a country mile. I'd also say in terms of artistic direction it is the most aesthetically pleasing out of all entries in the series. Character designs are a pretty divisive topic (particularly, the voluptuous/scantily-clad female designs), but I'd say subjectively they are the strongest, most iconic designs we've gotten in a Xeno game to date. While all the previous games have different strong points, they more or less even out when considering their individual weaknesses. I'd give the edge to Xenoblade X but only because I'm the type of gamer that prioritizes gameplay over story. Many JRPG fans care about the narrative delivery more than satisfying gameplay, and for that subset of gamer I would definitely recommend Xenoblade 2 as their best entry point into the series. Xenoblade 1 is an extremely solid game when viewed in a vacuum. However, it was surpassed completely by X and 2 in terms of gameplay & story respectively. Of course, a story-focused gamer may prefer to begin with Xenoblade 1 so they can fully appreciate everything Xenoblade 2 has to offer, since there is definitely some prerequisite knowledge that makes Xeno 2's story hit much harder than it would for someone going in blind. Therefore, my recommendation for you Neo G, would be the following: If you care primarily about story and character development start with Xenoblade Definitive Edition on Switch, and then once you are done follow up with Xenoblade 2. If you care primarily about gameplay and graphics, go for Xenoblade X (either via Wii U or Cemu emulator, or perhaps wait until we get a definitive edition on the Switch Pro or whatever lol). But regardless of what you do, I cannot in good faith recommend going for Xenoblade 3 as your entry point in the series. If all prior games were roughly around a 8.5/10 or 9/10, I'd say Xenoblade 3 is like a 5/10 so far. I cannot imagine the last half of the game improving upon every single element to such an extreme degree to compensate for how utterly devoid of quality it has been for the first 60 hours of content. But at the end of the day it's your money, you can spend it however you prefer. I just think If I had started with a game as lackluster as 3 I would have never become such a massive fan of the series because I likely would have dropped it around the 30 hour mark. Based on how large a delineation of quality there is between previous games in the series and 3, I heavily suspect those inflated review scores are paid off... But that's just my own perspective on the matter. ^-^ You may feel differently.

@@Jockey_P sweet, new copypasta

It's both a joy and a pity. Imagine this game running on a PS5... it would be awesome.

@@fastica I couldn't play the PS5 portably, so it would be a shame to be stuck at home with this game.

@@fastica you can't play a ps5 while traveling on the train or the public bus. There's some concessions to be made for handheld gaming while accounting for the price.

Imagine this beauty on steam deck*

@@leogeorge6016 no OLED + smaller screen = little beauty, unfortunately

If only pokemon could look this beautiful clear and with such good animation

Nope, it was an error from a leaker for Legend Arceus.

It think the had something to do with breath of the wild, don't remember if they helped with the first one or is helping with the sequel.

@@chrisb.2028 they helped a lot for Breath of the Wild 1&2. They made the whole topography for Breath of the Wild 1. In 2019, Monolith Soft even launch an employee recruitment page (with a beautiful Zelda artwork) just for Breath of the Wild 2.

Xenosaga II opening theme

MCLASSIC PLUG-AND-PLAY make the visuals even better;)

@@Data4664 shut up

Ethel is a hero, meaning she joins your party but can't be controlled by the player.

sure if you are used to playing at 360p hahahahahah gmaes a blurry mess

Except the women all like bland and dull

@@_CrimsonBlade dude, I have seen you through this comment section so many times. Why do you have such a hate boner for Xenoblade Chronicles 3

they need 5 years to make that... not just 3...

@@charlestrudel8308 So? The games arent even close visually, you could give gamefreak ten years and would still end up with subpar visuals.

To be fair, Monolith have been making these types of games since 2010. Game Freak have been only doing it since 2019, and PLA and SV are looking much better than their first attempt.

Pokemon is a dying franchise bc the devs are lazy

GameFreak is going for a art direction that is different from modern cell shading practices. In Scarlet/Violet, they are emulating the Pokemon Snap art direction while also adding hints of more competent texturing and modeling practices. Hopefully that also carries into the animation side. GameFreak and Monolith Soft should go for the art direction that suits them best.

Life is Strange on switch uses it too as well as switch sports.

MCLASSIC PLUG-AND-PLAY make the visuals even better;)

@@TonyJenn LiS isn't a Nintendo game. Didn't know about Switch Sports, I thought it just had FSR 1.0 stuff which isn't temporal.

People usually forget just because the Switch has less raw power, but the Switch is using more modern technology than the PS4. When developers take the time to optimise their games for the Switch, they can squeeze some surprisingly great results from the hardware.

@@MBrandr *modern MOBILE technology PS4 doesn't use mobile technology.

@@jeang7088 If I just wanted "not outdated" tech and cared about nothing but graphics, I'd just play on my desktop PC and skip outdated tech like the PS5 or the Steam Deck. ... But funny enough, I don't want to be lugging around 20kg of tech just so I can play games like Xenoblade 3 while travelling or lying in bed.

If you want even better image quality for this game. Buy a Mclassic.

@@someguy9204 More modern technology period. Did you not watch DF's analysis of Alien Isolation?

I was curious about it. I personally thought that MONOLITHSOFT is using the FIdelityFX Super Resolution technology.

Fidelity fx especially the first iteration is crap on low resolutions so thats definitely not it

@@katakouzinos Nintendo Switch Sports and Life is Strange: True Colors Nintendo Switch Edition say otherwise, Vladimir Putin.

@@TonyKanameKuran yea no actually i can tell by reading your comments and what you upload in your channel that you have single digit iq poor sod

Nintendo doesn’t deserve this franchise. It should be done on a proper current gen system.

@@mikeslemonade such a weird comment. “You don’t deserve it!” Sounds like a you type of issue.

@@mikeslemonade Cope harder.

@@markellhawthorne2921 agreed I think you should

@@mikeslemonade What? Nintendo owns Monolith Soft and the IP as a whole. Cope harder :-)

I doubt it. They do maintenance patches for bugs and oversights, but backporting a game engine is bigger than anything they've done for a game post-launch. Even if XC3s engine is still derived from XCXs engine, you can bet there are per-game tweaks and optimisations that would make backporting it a huge undertaking.

When did I made this comment 🤔

@@monado1761 lol