I had a C-1 in the 1980s, had several FET failures due to heat. I eventually removed the phonograph Amp circuit board to reduce heat, and installed dozens of heatsinks on remaining FETs that were hot.
@KITR-UK5 ай бұрын
I was actually thinking about doing the same thing. I don't use the phono bit anyway, and your comment makes me want to do it even more.
@glups19664 ай бұрын
Très riche en réglages, très pointu également, je me souvient de sa sortie ... à l'époque inabordable pour ma bourse 😞 ... j'ai acquis par la suite sont petit frère le c2-a et le c2 x qui fonctionne avec 2 B6 (sûrement mes deux blocs de puissant préféré) ça tourne comme une horloge et ça sonne incroyablement bien. Mais je louche sûr votre C1 que j'aimerai bien tester sur ma grosse configuration .... La Scalla Kplisch AL serie II .... un délice j'en suis certain !!!! .... merci pour ce magnifique exposé sur le Yamaha C1 une des meilleurs preampli au monde !!!
@adaboy4z Жыл бұрын
Great review. I have the B-2 amplifier and T-1 tuner, waiting on the C2 preamp to arrive.
@KITR-UK Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Is it C2, C2A or C2X?
@adaboy4z Жыл бұрын
@@KITR-UK C2
@sergiolams3 ай бұрын
Beautiful! I wish I had one to match my Cygnus Power Amplifier.
@emiljordanov10 ай бұрын
Всеки комплект трябва да има и още няколко нива на обработка на сигнала, въпреки по-дългия път на сигнала. Да, зная, че използването на повече устройства, отнема част от информацията. Но си заслужава, особено ако тези допълнителни устройства са добре направени. Използвайте след предусилвателя - EQ, crosover, compressor and exspander, AH connektor и други. EQ допълнително разделя сигнала. Може да не променяте линейните му характеристики и той пак ще раздели сигнала. Добре е да използвате захранващ кабел от алуминий с медно покритие - 2.0 мм. за усилвателя. Този кабел подобрява атаката, остротата и обема на звука. Не е вярно, че пречистената мед е по-добрия вариант за захранващ кабел. Моля изпробвайте алуминиев кабел с медно покритие поне 2.0 мм. Естествено трябва да „прегори“ поне един месец. Ако желаете можете да изпробвате комбинации. Например алуминиев кабел за половината устройства от стелажа и меден за другата половина, в каквато последователност желаете. Или в различно отношение 2:1 или 1:2. Медните кабели имат проблем с атаката. Това може да се отстрани чрез добавянето на алуминиев кабел към някои устройства от стелажа.
@RUfromthe40s10 ай бұрын
mid highs and mid lows the presence and acoustic, when i lived in Africa i had the cover off the component so i could put two metal fans from toshiba to avoid excessive heat and more dangerous the high level of humidity
@BožidarŽurićАй бұрын
Hello Karl, i am owner of two B1, one B2, Sony TA-N7B several Ta-e88 and 88b, Kyocera C910, B910, Kenwood Supremes and so on ans so on. All my amps and preamps has been fully restaurated. In your video you are mention the Ta-e88 and compare it to the Yamaha C1, has the Sony been restaurated? I heard lots of preamps and never heard anything better than Sony even TOTL Accuphase like C2800 cant compete with Sony. Only Kenwood L07c-II is near but with slightly different type of sound. Regards, Božidar
@trevor24511 ай бұрын
Absolutely beautiful pre amp. I didn't realize just how large it was until you were sitting in front of it in the end. Makes sense though considering the weight. I would absolutely love one of the higher end yamaha integrated amps like the ca-2010 in black as I think the colour is absolutely gorgeous, but sadly they don't exist. You mention the sound being slightly smoother which to me indicates that the output is slightly coloured, perhaps that characteristic smooth warmish v-fet sound? I missed a ta-8650 the other month on ebay for +-1000 euros which is a shame. Still looking for a nice integrated amplifier that has some nice looks. I am currently using a ta-4650 which has a pretty decent output stage but the pre amp frankly is not great.
@KITR-UK11 ай бұрын
She's gorgeous, isn't she? You're right, the output may be a bit coloured to a warmer side, but that's what I love about that. That's a shame you missed the TA-8650. I just finished restoring TAN-8550, which I'm going to review next month or so, and if the TA-8650 (which I haven't heard yet) is at least half as good, you should really regret you missed her. I haven't heard the TA-4650 either, but why is the pre-amp bit not great?
@trevor24511 ай бұрын
@@KITR-UK It functions well but it's just not very high end, same for the ta-5650. The pre amplification section is pretty similar to the ta 3650. Decent amplifier but with the ta-4650 compared to the output stage it's just a shame to use it with the built in pre amp. In my experience it has quite a bit of channel bleed through and the noise floor isn't fantastic. I am sure recapping and recalibrating it would work better but the consensus online seems to be similar.
@RUfromthe40s10 ай бұрын
i have some pre-amplifiers bought in the 70´s or 90´s and this one was always one of my favorite ones for the functions it as one can improve the sound of any source and also have a receiver that one can put all sources at the same output level ,i only saw it on yamaha amplifiers or receivers, i have more components from other brands but yamaha always had great equipment ,this is a good example ,it´s very rare to see a so complete pre-amplifier, some even say that is excessive and no need for it but then some tell me "i don´t like the sound of this record " and i reply well in my pre i can make it sound better ,you have a better one you told me so why can´t you make it sound better ?if amplifiers have tone controls or loudness why are they not used, the old story of that´s how the artist wanted it to be heard to what i reply i´m sure that in the studio it must had sounded great or it wouldn´t be released. the Sony you refered is the same in what sound quality ?while listening in flat or the yamaha which can be improved by several functions available on it ,the reason why i say it´s my favorite, more important the already refered output level for each inputs or source´s
@ThePetar9112 жыл бұрын
vfet ok, i do have ta-n7 completely restored, b2 is just about to be restored, but imho and to my ears nothing can beat kenwood supreme 700m, perfect in every way. C1 is so expensive, out of my budget, but it looks nice:)
@KITR-UK2 жыл бұрын
How does the TA-N7 sound? I'm going to have mine properly restored in couple of days, so I wonder if she's going to dethrone my favourite B-3s.
@ThePetar9112 жыл бұрын
@@KITR-UK i have never seen or heard b3, ta-n7 is brilliant i every way, soon my guy willl finish b2 restoration so i can compare two, but i am sure both are excellent. Although as i said to my ears kenwood supreme 700m is my thing. There is atm one b1 for sale in germany 3600eur, a bit pricy for me, but it is still good buy imho.
@weijiantan65342 жыл бұрын
It's such a pity the old C-1 does not have XLR in and out 🤣
@shaggyburn10 ай бұрын
I have a restored Sony N7, restored Yamaha B2 and a restored Kenwood KA 907(the last of the Supreme series) the Vfet are more musical than the Kenwood. Kenwood has incredible grip and detail, however. The B2 is fuller with a wider sound stage. The Sony N7 is my favorite. It has a crystalline quality that is razor sharp but soft as a feather. 😊 thanks for the video and thanks to Hi Fi Squirrel AKA Peter for his restorations.
@KITR-UK10 ай бұрын
It seems like you fancy your TA-N7, good choice. It was my favourite as well, until recently. I've just finished restoring my TAN-8550, and it seems she's just superior to every other V-FET I've got, including the TA-N7. I'll give it some time before making a video though.
@borlibaer11 ай бұрын
I always wondered if there is a C1 beside the C2 & C4 ... 😲
@RUfromthe40s10 ай бұрын
the Dragon there makes me fell really bad i had two 10 years apart never got more than one year working correctelly but if i knew i would have bought at least 10 to sell them today they weren´t that expensive compared to other brands deck´s but i have others that still work perfect from NAK.
@lordy917 Жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to hear any deference between this and the C6 that has MC I/p and parametric eq
@RUfromthe40s10 ай бұрын
i think this as parametric equalizer as the c-6 that i also own one but it´s not written there but lot of frequency changes can be done in higher or lower ones, not sure of being the same but by their sound it seems the same but in a diferent display, the mc input for phono is not there but for some reason it wasn´t included one but 3 phono inputs with level of sound adjustment, i have 3 turntables with didferent sounding cartridges and sound type normally a diferent frequency response but more interesting having all diferent type of sound and all turntables are good
@RUfromthe40s10 ай бұрын
i went to see the impedance in the phono inputs but maybe if choosen correctelly one can match a mc type in one of those imputs maybe , i have not here the mc type impedances and other specifications but for the year of realease should have it allthough it was not much used by this time the mc type cartridges i had one in a pioneer system that is still working but like i said i can´t confirm the impedances or other specifications at the moment
@alishaheedmuhamad20 күн бұрын
Pioneer Exclusive C-7 or Sony TA-ER1 might be better.
@poypoy9028 Жыл бұрын
Johny sins? Is that you?
@KITR-UK Жыл бұрын
Nope.
@33ordie2 жыл бұрын
8 pounds = 17 kilos ? what!
@KITR-UK2 жыл бұрын
I said 38lbs :)
@mahi-hd6cv2 жыл бұрын
@@KITR-UK plz help ,, Yamaha C2 Pre vs Mark Levenson no 38s ,, witch better sounds ?
@KITR-UK2 жыл бұрын
@@mahi-hd6cv Since I never heard either of these models, I won't be much of a help. What I heard though, was Yamaha C-2x (which is supposedly completely different pre-amp) and that was very similar to the C-1. As for Mark Levinson I was never a fan, there is something I don't fancy about their gear, sound-wise.
@mahi-hd6cv2 жыл бұрын
@@KITR-UK thanks you dear for reply tell me which better because i have Yamaha C-2 i think i buy M L 380s but i have no idea tell me which better sounds ?