YF-23 Black Widow II - Northrop's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) That Lost To The YF-22 | Upscaled

  Рет қаралды 112,877

DroneScapes

DroneScapes

Жыл бұрын

The Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23 is an American single-seat, twin-engine stealth fighter aircraft technology demonstrator designed for the United States Air Force (USAF).
This is the story of this ATF aircraft told by test pilots, engineers and people behind this remarkable project that did not win.
The design was a finalist in the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter competition, battling the Lockheed YF-22 for a production contract. Two YF-23 prototypes were built, nicknamed "Black Widow II" and "Gray Ghost".
In the 1980s, the USAF began looking for a replacement for its fighter aircraft, especially to counter the USSR's advanced Sukhoi Su-27 and Mikoyan MiG-29. Several companies submitted design proposals; the USAF selected proposals from Northrop and Lockheed. Northrop teamed with McDonnell Douglas to develop the YF-23, while Lockheed, Boeing, and General Dynamics developed the YF-22.
The YF-23 was stealthier and faster, but less agile than its competitor. After a four-year development and evaluation process, the YF-22 was announced the winner in 1991 and entered production as the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. The U.S. Navy considered using the production version of the ATF as the basis for a replacement to the F-14, but these plans were later canceled. The two YF-23 prototypes are currently museum exhibits.
American reconnaissance satellites first spotted the advanced Soviet Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter prototypes in 1978, which caused concern in the U.S. Both Soviet models were expected to reduce the maneuverability advantage of contemporary US fighter aircraft. In 1981, the USAF requested information from several aerospace companies on possible features for an Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) to replace the F-15 Eagle. After discussions with aerospace companies, the USAF made air-to-air combat the primary role for the ATF. The ATF was to take advantage of emerging technologies, including composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight-control systems, more powerful propulsion systems, and stealth technology. In October 1985, the USAF issued a request for proposal (RFP) to several aircraft manufacturers. The RFP was modified in May 1986 to include the evaluation of prototype air vehicles from the two finalists. At the same time, the U.S. Navy, under the Navalized Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF) program, announced that it would use a derivative of the ATF winner to replace its F-14 Tomcat. The NATF program called for procurement of 546 aircraft along with the USAF's planned procurement of 750 aircraft.
In July 1986, proposals were submitted by Lockheed, Boeing, General Dynamics, McDonnell Douglas, Northrop, Grumman and Rockwell. The latter two dropped out of competition shortly thereafter. Following proposal submissions, Lockheed, Boeing, and General Dynamics formed a team to develop whichever of their proposed designs was selected, if any. Northrop and McDonnell Douglas formed a team with a similar agreement. The Lockheed and Northrop proposals were selected as finalists on 31 October 1986 for demonstration and validation (Dem/Val). Both teams were given 50 months to build and flight-test their prototypes, and they were successful, producing the Lockheed YF-22 and the Northrop YF-23.
The YF-23 was designed to meet USAF requirements for survivability, supercruise, stealth, and ease of maintenance. Supercruise requirements called for prolonged supersonic flight without the use of afterburners. Northrop drew on its experience with the B-2 Spirit and F/A-18 Hornet to reduce the model's susceptibility to radar and infrared detection. The USAF initially required the aircraft to land and stop within 2,000 feet (610 m), which meant the use of thrust reversers on their engines. In 1987, the USAF changed the runway length requirement to 3,000 feet (910 m), so thrust reversers were no longer needed. This allowed the aircraft to have smaller engine nacelle housings. The nacelles were not downsized on the prototypes.
General characteristics
Crew: 1
Length: 67 ft 5 in (20.55 m)
Wingspan: 43 ft 7 in (13.28 m)
Height: 13 ft 11 in (4.24 m)
Wing area: 900 sq ft (84 m2)
Empty weight: 29,000 lb (13,154 kg)
Gross weight: 51,320 lb (23,278 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 62,000 lb (28,123 kg)
Powerplant: 2 × Pratt & Whitney YF119 or General Electric YF120 afterburning turbofan engines, 35,000 lbf (160 kN) with afterburner
Performance
Maximum speed: Mach 2.2 (1,450 mph, 2,335 km/h) at high altitude
Supercruise: Mach 1.6+ at altitude
Range: 2,424 nmi (2,789 mi, 4,489 km)
Combat range: 651-695 nmi (749-800 mi, 1,206-1,287 km)
Service ceiling: 65,000 ft (20,000 m)
Wing loading: 57 lb/sq ft (280 kg/m2)
Thrust/weight: 1.36
Armament
None as tested but provisions made for:
1 × 20 mm (0.79 in) M61 Vulcan cannon
4 × AIM-120 AMRAAM or AIM-7 Sparrow medium-range air-to-air missiles
2 × AIM-9 Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missiles
#YF23 #northrop #aircraft

Пікірлер: 166
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Watch more aviation videos and learn more about American pilots on our channel at: kzfaq.info
@mrmichael0867
@mrmichael0867 Жыл бұрын
The yf23 looks like it could compete for Gen 6,especially if upgraded with newer technologies. I sincerely believe the f22 was chosen because it was the safer bet(t though I'm sure there were politics involved), the y23 was just too advanced at the time.
@lknanml
@lknanml Жыл бұрын
The 23 was a bit faster and had a slightly smaller radar sig but A LOT of the systems were "upconung" when they went into the downselect program. The F22 turned better. The 23 also made larger contrails and had no thrust vectoring though it had a bigger rear wing surface. Both are amazing aircraft the main problem was the 23 program was not as developed as the 22. The 23 had more bugs and more "coming soon just pretend they are there" parts and systems than the 22. Kind of like how the X32 had to take off a bunch of parts to pass a few tests then put them back on with a "we have it sorted just didn't have time to build it" backlog of features. I somewhat recall and issue with missile storage and high Gs. The YF23 was an awesome plane and would have ended up just as good as the F22. Both programs were phenomenal. In the end the F22 program was just slightly ahead and more complete.
@jaybee9269
@jaybee9269 Жыл бұрын
Plus they wanted to preserve the industrial base and what was Lockheed building at the time?
@lknanml
@lknanml Жыл бұрын
@@jaybee9269 I know I know!!! They were working on the software for the Mars Climate Orbiter. Shortly thereafter a conversation took place which went something like "What do you mean metric?"
@lknanml
@lknanml Жыл бұрын
And making arcade game systems. No really.....
@jaybee9269
@jaybee9269 Жыл бұрын
@@lknanml >> They weren’t making many airplanes at the time!🫣😵‍💫
@mattmarlette4977
@mattmarlette4977 2 ай бұрын
I’ve lived my entire life in Lancaster and Rosamond which is literally 15 -20 minutes from the Edwards AFB tarmac. The things I’ve had the pleasure of seeing flying “just cause” has been an awesome thing to grow up seeing randomly literally all the time.
@Ben_Gunner
@Ben_Gunner Жыл бұрын
Grateful for this being shown 👏 She is such a beautiful aircraft and just as fearsome looking. The pic of the B2 coming into land and the Widow taxiing on the runway below is just perfect. Politics...
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
👍👍
@paulm749
@paulm749 Жыл бұрын
LOT'S of good information here that I haven't heard or seen elsewhere. Well done! In all my reading about these two planes, I can't help but believe that the YF23 ultimately promised to have higher performance in supercruise, stealth and range, but that Lockheed knew how to work the politics of the procurement process more effectively. We still got a very good plane, but we might have had an even better one...
@brinkee7674
@brinkee7674 6 ай бұрын
Another reason that played into the decision was that Northrop had gone way over budget on the B2. Magnificent plane but the cost is insane I hope to see the YF23 reborn into Japan's new fighter. Who knows if they build it but stealth is very expensive
@peppapig9987
@peppapig9987 Жыл бұрын
I'm a simple man. I see YF-23 I click.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
🙂👍❤
@daviidtaplin1115
@daviidtaplin1115 Жыл бұрын
Two different aircraft the F-22 /F23 both are great it may be the only time that both should have been in production.Both are way ahead of there time.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Agreed
@selinRedito-bd4vp
@selinRedito-bd4vp 8 ай бұрын
Why can boeng - northrop build the grey ghost same size as super f18 hornet with vectoring exhaust and sell it to other countries who are interested on the design.and I think lots of countries are interested it is a revolutionary design.
@koyotekola6916
@koyotekola6916 5 ай бұрын
I think the AF likes Lockheed fighters and Northrup bombers. I was on the Martin avionics design team for the YF-23, partnered with McDonnell Douglas and Westinghouse. I worked on one particular sensor. When the YF-22 was chosen, the Air Force decided to put our sensor on the F-22. I'm not bragging, because it was our chief systems engineer who oversaw the development and showed us how to design the best optimal sensor. The AF liked him a lot except for one thing, which I can't discuss. He taught me one great thing - Quaternion matrices. Now some of you may think quaternions have been obsoleted by Newton calculus. That's what the other team thought, too.
@elijahprasad7884
@elijahprasad7884 5 ай бұрын
Which kind of Math did you guys use on the YF-23? We got Quaternion Matrices, and what else?
@koyotekola6916
@koyotekola6916 5 ай бұрын
@@elijahprasad7884 I'm not sure what your asking, because we used all kinds of math from simple addition to simple divide. Quaternions were only used selectively on certain functions that they were well suited for.
@elijahprasad7884
@elijahprasad7884 5 ай бұрын
@@koyotekola6916How were Quaternions used for the sensor?
@koyotekola6916
@koyotekola6916 5 ай бұрын
@@elijahprasad7884 I cannot answer that, Elijah. Sorry.
@elijahprasad7884
@elijahprasad7884 5 ай бұрын
@@koyotekola6916 Is it classified? Thank you anyway🥇
@konstantinosmichos5749
@konstantinosmichos5749 Жыл бұрын
this should be the NextGen Aircraft of US...
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
It is indeed a wonderful fighter
@brewtown46614
@brewtown46614 Жыл бұрын
japan has acquired the rights to it
@commonavionics6069
@commonavionics6069 Жыл бұрын
Outdated at this point
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
@@commonavionics6069 might be, but still a wonderful aircraft.
@commonavionics6069
@commonavionics6069 Жыл бұрын
@@Dronescapes No doubt, it isn’t a surprise it has partially inspired the NGAD apparently.
@cliffcampbell8827
@cliffcampbell8827 Жыл бұрын
I remember working on a Pratt & Whitney, 4 stroke, single piston engine in small engines class in high school and my mom used General Electric appliances (like a blender or maybe it was a hand held food mixer {the kind with 2 counter rotating beaters}). It just seems funny to me (not funny "ha-ha" but funny "weird") knowing I've interacted with very basic, low tech equipment manufactured by the same companies that produce cutting edge, highly classified military equipment. I love the look of both planes. What I don't understand is WHY wasn't the YF-23 chosen. It was even available an entire month ahead of the YF-22...maybe someone over at McDonald/Douglas was buddy-buddy with those on capitol hill more so than those at Lockheed. Maybe McDonald/Douglas promised some favors/kickbacks/under-the-table stuff to those who pick the big military contracts.
@TheDwightMamba
@TheDwightMamba Ай бұрын
Northrop was dealing with delays on the B2 and the YF-22 showed up with thrust vectoring. It wowed the powers that be into thinking it wouldn't need to dogfight, but could also dogfight. I think the better jet lost too. The YF-23 had been doing refuels at all speeds and even opened the weapons bay for the judges. They should have made them simulate a battle.
@johnforealdoe8999
@johnforealdoe8999 Жыл бұрын
Should have developed F/A-23 as an attack aircraft and let the F-22 handle pure air superiority, like money matters. Imagine a strike package with these two aircraft in it.
@profo4544
@profo4544 Жыл бұрын
6th gen fighter from the 80s, diamond wing complete unique design.
@deankoko6691
@deankoko6691 Жыл бұрын
Sometimes it is not how good your fighter jet is that wins you the contract when two jets are very close in capability but who you know in the Pentagon.
@YouTube_user3333
@YouTube_user3333 Жыл бұрын
It will be funny when they roll out the NGAD plane and it’s a YF-23 😆
@13BulliTs
@13BulliTs 10 ай бұрын
Still the most beautiful and fastest plane ever made even under the standards of today!
@redlabel9294
@redlabel9294 3 ай бұрын
Yes, but sort of. The SR71 is the most beautiful aircraft ever designed. If we eliminate that, then yes... the F23 is unmatched
@bencallahan8938
@bencallahan8938 Жыл бұрын
The yf-23 was a 6th generation fighter in a 4th generation world
@dannywaller4397
@dannywaller4397 7 ай бұрын
They should have picked both and figured it out later
@cornellkirk8946
@cornellkirk8946 Жыл бұрын
“Radar loves a flat plate or a sharp edge” F117 *whistling*
@dom3810
@dom3810 Жыл бұрын
It’s insane to think that the F22 was designed in the late 80s
@njez7563
@njez7563 7 ай бұрын
Whats crazier is fhe Boeing Quiet Bird that was made in the 60s
@un9ty
@un9ty Жыл бұрын
Rest in peace Dr Liu
@christianvernaghi3966
@christianvernaghi3966 Ай бұрын
Is he dead?! 😳
@un9ty
@un9ty Ай бұрын
​@@christianvernaghi3966Yes, he passed away in 2018.
@christianvernaghi3966
@christianvernaghi3966 Ай бұрын
Ohh...😢​@@un9ty
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 Жыл бұрын
Nice work
@njez7563
@njez7563 7 ай бұрын
I love these videos very cool
@125israel
@125israel Жыл бұрын
Dr Yu-Ping Liu died in 2018 aged 72.
@TheKasperlkopf
@TheKasperlkopf Жыл бұрын
Insane video
@world9587
@world9587 Ай бұрын
I always love to watch this video
@joeygay7115
@joeygay7115 5 ай бұрын
This could still be a viable option for the US. Tech is more advanced now which would make this the top fighter in tue skys
@rockcvn71
@rockcvn71 Жыл бұрын
Isn't GE in China now? Anyway super Kool hands down YF23, every time I watch this video,my heart goes out to all Northrop Grumman, and MCDONALD Douglas folks who gave their all for the protection and patriotism that went into creating a aircraft to keep America secure. You guys should've won.❤️
@_BusterHighmen
@_BusterHighmen 5 ай бұрын
Northrop Corporation developed the YF23 with McDonnell Douglas between 1982 to 1991. Northrop didn’t merge with Grumman until 1994
@brianwrynn3109
@brianwrynn3109 Жыл бұрын
A guy I knew at Northrop said that when the first F-23 was rolled out to present to a bunch of big-wigs, upon power-up it began to flap its control surfaces like a wounded turkey. This provoked laughter from the onlookers. I do not know if the story is true but if someone else here was at the event they could respond.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Interesting story, I wonder if anyone can contribute
@trenazer
@trenazer 7 ай бұрын
It was the stability augmentation system which on the ground tried to correct the airplane flight moving the surfaces at every bump on the tarmac. it was later corrected.
@michelbrown1060
@michelbrown1060 24 күн бұрын
Magnificent bird. sensuous. elegant lines Just love it. . .
@constantinelheman
@constantinelheman 7 ай бұрын
The most beautiful jet fighter ever made. But sometimes I wonder if it is cost effective to be used in real battle.
@kaneo1
@kaneo1 7 ай бұрын
Black Widow II / Gray Ghost is amazing! Hope the rumor the Japanese are considering for themselves is true. Widow & Raptor probably caused a few hemmorhages in the KGB.
@plebian44
@plebian44 Жыл бұрын
the best medium range stealth attack aircraft
@kevinferrin5695
@kevinferrin5695 Жыл бұрын
It's beautiful and mean looking at the same time. It looks like it's intent on eating you up.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
👍👍
@lincolnflemming1631
@lincolnflemming1631 Жыл бұрын
Greatest 👍🙏❤️
@nachitobody
@nachitobody Жыл бұрын
They next 6g This plane is the Best of the Best , all times. This plane is the GOAT
@stevendegiorgio3143
@stevendegiorgio3143 Жыл бұрын
I have the model in 1/48 scale by Hobbyboss.I love that plane.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
👍
@rosevitelli5814
@rosevitelli5814 Жыл бұрын
Wow that plane is beautiful what the hell were they 🤔
@franz289
@franz289 5 күн бұрын
I was watching the news when they announced a competition between the 2 planes and it was decided that F-22 would get the contract because it was more cost effective. Nothing wrong with 23 but it just simply cost more to make.
@jogon1511
@jogon1511 Жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful aircraft why they never went for this i dont know.
@n20prostock97
@n20prostock97 5 ай бұрын
Politics...
@AtroposLeshesis
@AtroposLeshesis 9 ай бұрын
CONTRACT AWARDED TO THE BLACK WIDOW ATF YF 23
@rooseveltd.3308
@rooseveltd.3308 2 ай бұрын
Sure seems like this plane should be built today!
@brizzy991
@brizzy991 Жыл бұрын
Diamond wing looks like a serious lift and stability issue at a glance
@steveleach4973
@steveleach4973 8 ай бұрын
Like the F-15? 😅
@jacksonboone8396
@jacksonboone8396 8 ай бұрын
This would still beat the junk35 today.
@johnarmstrong7729
@johnarmstrong7729 Жыл бұрын
I was under the impression, that whichever manufacturers didn't get their plane accepted, were guaranteed to be a major subcontractor by way of compensation. I may be wrong...?
@marcogoncalves8631
@marcogoncalves8631 Жыл бұрын
Lack of thrust vectoring May have been a factor why it wasn’t chosen .
@brizzy991
@brizzy991 Жыл бұрын
Id say stability look at that diamond wing looks really bad for lift it might be ok at higher speeds but id say disastrous at lower speeds how many diamond wings have you seen chosen for fighters?,
@joeclaridy
@joeclaridy 7 ай бұрын
If you look the requirements for the ATF, thrust vectoring shouldn't have been a factor when the whole point of the ATF was to defeat Soviet air defense and long-range weaponry.
@njez7563
@njez7563 7 ай бұрын
It was just as manoverable as the yf22 tho
@TheDwightMamba
@TheDwightMamba Ай бұрын
​@@brizzy991the diamond shape was for low speed stability that didn't compromise high speeds. It also worked great for stealth. The diagonal "rudders" were huge. That's where the control came from.
@winncollins2356
@winncollins2356 Жыл бұрын
Should of put both in production with both the f-22 and f-23 would allow the US to dominate the sky's for years in my opinion I understand a lot of cost but how do you put a price on safety of our country and most of all our pilots during war
@steveleach4973
@steveleach4973 8 ай бұрын
I agree with you 100% money wasn't the issue with the way democrats always throw it at different countries.
@byhyew
@byhyew 6 ай бұрын
People couldn't see into the future. In the 1990s Russia was struggling just not to starve, and the best planes China was producing were Mig-21s improved with 1980s American avionics... The YF22/YF23 was one to two generations ahead technologically, not to mention the American airforce's huge numerical advantage, so it really wasn't necessary spending double to keep both.
@frankbaker0460
@frankbaker0460 Жыл бұрын
It is a good moment to the United State🇺🇸
@desertroadgames5702
@desertroadgames5702 10 ай бұрын
I wish the ATF-23 would have won
@lincolnflemming1631
@lincolnflemming1631 Жыл бұрын
Best
@jaybee9269
@jaybee9269 Жыл бұрын
Most of this looks to be from the “Web of Secrecy” video. One thing I never understood was the little derpy attempt at thrust-vectoring above the thermal troughs of the exhausts.
@Shadowboost
@Shadowboost 6 ай бұрын
It didn't have thrust vectoring. The original requirements of the ATF program required short field capability for supply and rearm. Thus it was designed with the intakes sized for thrust reversers. Although they were never fitted. The production version would have slimmed down the engine humps significantly and it would have been even stealthier and faster
@joesc641
@joesc641 Жыл бұрын
This is a great plane but no thrust vectoring and wing design are main reasons they did not pick the YF-23.
@tylero2112
@tylero2112 Жыл бұрын
like it couldnt be added.... this thing will be the base design of the 6th gen. watch....
@elijahprasad7884
@elijahprasad7884 Жыл бұрын
What was bad about the wing design?
@elijahprasad7884
@elijahprasad7884 Жыл бұрын
@@tylero2112 All the 6th gen renderings look a lot like the F-23.
@wileyeyefloaty665
@wileyeyefloaty665 9 ай бұрын
They housed the engines a particular way with specific outlet ducts to further stealth properties. From what I've seen a out yf23 it was maneuverable enough without vectoring to barely be out rated by the 22. Thus briging back the political aspect of the winner there was many factors in play to have caused the raptor to be chosen. I myself don't agree with it though the 22 is by no means bad when I say that. The widow was just something else. Foreshadowing future setups that would be showing the capacity all wrapped into the yf23 as it stood. A true symbol of its time
@slmyatt
@slmyatt 9 ай бұрын
Omg. The YF-23 is shaped similar to the fictional Firefox from Clint Eastwood movie.
@SLS9033
@SLS9033 Жыл бұрын
I'd make it part of the fleet now. Get rid of the F-18, 15, and 16 then we have the 22, 23 and 35. Their problem solved we win everyone else loses.
@user-xt4uf6ij6w
@user-xt4uf6ij6w 24 күн бұрын
Why hasn't the Black Widow not been taken up with a different country?
@hipoman8087
@hipoman8087 6 ай бұрын
Its continuing in development with Japan. the extra $ will help and this fighter will help japan defense. From what I gathered they approched US & Northrop-McDonnel Douglas on joint development . Yhey were not having success with theirs and taking too long. great idea!
@blech71
@blech71 2 ай бұрын
It’s quite sad that it was said iirc; that the 23 was “too” stealthy wrt to coatings and other approaches. As if it was a waste and over done. I think this was interesting and tbf a dumb assessment by the other side.
@evanbeers1644
@evanbeers1644 Жыл бұрын
Isn't the YF23 the one that the f22 beat out due to politics? Or was it a different plane?
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
The same. This video is the story of the plane that never was
@evanbeers1644
@evanbeers1644 Жыл бұрын
@@Dronescapes can't wait
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
@@evanbeers1644 It's VERY interesting, since the test pilots are explaining a lot of details
@roadkill-uk
@roadkill-uk Жыл бұрын
without a doubt ahead of time
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
@@roadkill-uk Agreed!
@RogueBeatsARG
@RogueBeatsARG Жыл бұрын
Wait, Wonder Woman had a Invisible F-104?
@houseofmine
@houseofmine Жыл бұрын
the plane we should have got...
@turkey0165
@turkey0165 6 ай бұрын
If the YF-23 was just as maneuverable as the YF-22who gave a s***, whether it had Thrust Vectoring or not, thrust vectoring is just expensive and something more to go wrong.!
@tylero2112
@tylero2112 Жыл бұрын
this plane will be brought back . mark my word. it loooked 6th gen when we were going to 5th...saw this thing at the air force museum down the street is gorgeous you dont understand it until you see it and you get confused how the hell it lost to the f22
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
It seems that Japan might get it
@henrypark7381
@henrypark7381 Жыл бұрын
No thrust vectoring, pthbbb! That's horse shhhoe...uh. Yeah, I'm sure this was justified in that; they knew the f22 was going to be the chosen fighter. While the f 23 was quietly held in some back hangar, just waiting. Waiting to be the testbed of future EW, and High Energy Weapons. That's why it was gutted. The tech just needed to be invented, and then installed: installed in an already produced and forgotten hyper stealthy jet, and then flown around going, "YIPPIE!"
@lincolnflemming1631
@lincolnflemming1631 Жыл бұрын
Great greatest USA 👍💗👍💗💗
@rbr8931
@rbr8931 Жыл бұрын
Missiles faster than bullets🤔?
@Shadowboost
@Shadowboost 6 ай бұрын
Yes, of course. Missiles can go Mach 4
@johnback0007
@johnback0007 4 ай бұрын
Are you OK buddy? 😂😂
@AtroposLeshesis
@AtroposLeshesis 9 ай бұрын
6TH GEN ALREADY APPROVED.
@waynejackson4890
@waynejackson4890 7 ай бұрын
I'm hoping the F-23 will be reborn as our next super fighter after the F-22.
@joeclaridy
@joeclaridy 7 ай бұрын
If you look at artist rendering of proposed 6th generation fighters, the inspiration is obvious. None of them looks like the F-22.
@johnforealdoe8999
@johnforealdoe8999 Жыл бұрын
Should have developed F-23 as an attack aircraft and let the F-22 handle air superiority. Like money matters.
@turkey0165
@turkey0165 6 ай бұрын
The nation of Japan knows a good thing when they see it. And that's why they're gonna make a new Modern version of the YF23 and not buy any of the current American fighters from American manufactures! No PC pentagon BS for Japan!
@godsgripkitsofficial3452
@godsgripkitsofficial3452 Жыл бұрын
Just to let everyone know you can personally see this aircraft at the western museum of flight.
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info ♥️🙏
@9eadityalakhanpal702
@9eadityalakhanpal702 Жыл бұрын
Bizarre video man
@brinkee7674
@brinkee7674 6 ай бұрын
Story says when they stuck the model of YF23 on the pole they use to shoot radar at plane. The radar only came back with readings from the pole and it was like the plane wasn't even there. The pole was designed to emit very low radar signature and it still totally washed out the plane
@jarbarian
@jarbarian 10 ай бұрын
YF-23 > YF-22. The better plane lost.
@Agent-sb5jy
@Agent-sb5jy Жыл бұрын
I think we built it...it's better than the Raptor....it's a secret plane. You do realize we have weapons that are Top-Secret. We don't publish all of our capabilities...example: F-22' s fly off carriers 😵 (Retired Navy) bet ya' didn't know that.
@MrCcoolg
@MrCcoolg Жыл бұрын
I always believed that it was possible to fly F22's from carriers. Years ago, when they were testing both the 23 & the 22, I read in Janes Aircraft that the Navy had been doing evals for both. Part of the requirements they had was that the nose gear needed to be sturdier for catapult launches. I can't say for sure bc of how long it's been but I remember seeing a photo of an F23 on a carrier deck. I said then and Still believe it should have been the replacement interceptor for the TomCat. It was faster, had stealth, had slightly longer legs and the dihedral wings supposedly made carrier landings easier.
@cliffcampbell8827
@cliffcampbell8827 Жыл бұрын
I didn't KNOW the F-22 was carrier capable, but I had my suspicions. The things that kept me from believing even more that these low observable craft were carrier capable were 1: the catch hook (drag hook? The bar that scrapes along the deck designed to grab one of those 4 arrester cables) and folding the wings to save space on the carrier, those things would increase it's radar signature?...the radio waves that bounce off the craft back to the radar sending waves looking for flying military stuff.
@professionalprocrastinator8103
@professionalprocrastinator8103 Жыл бұрын
I think you're delusional
@richardkremer5830
@richardkremer5830 6 күн бұрын
trying to sell a state of the art product to a bunch of duulards, requires more than excellence. History shows, that snake oil is required, when selling something beyond the IQ of the buyer. Our top brass is just plain stupid.
@redlabel9294
@redlabel9294 3 ай бұрын
Sexiest 5th gen fighter. Not even close. I find the F22 the ugly sister in comparison. I wish the F23 had won out.
@literallyshaking8019
@literallyshaking8019 21 күн бұрын
Lockheed has better lobbyists than Northrop, simple as.
@commonavionics6069
@commonavionics6069 Жыл бұрын
The 229 was NOT stealthy.
@Xeus1985
@Xeus1985 11 ай бұрын
For me the YF-23 was the winner. This Astethics just amazing Plane that should get picked over the F-22. Sure The F-22 is still amazing but the YF-23 got more potential.
@-aoiwaraiotoko1441
@-aoiwaraiotoko1441 7 ай бұрын
これってさあ、尾翼取って無尾翼機にすればいいんじゃないの?
@mohamedjabar9499
@mohamedjabar9499 Жыл бұрын
هههههه…
@jeffreystonesr.9505
@jeffreystonesr.9505 2 ай бұрын
#1
@jeryjoe9739
@jeryjoe9739 Жыл бұрын
6th generation coming soon fy23
@user-oz4lt4uo7r
@user-oz4lt4uo7r 2 ай бұрын
Eh binta nyo na yan sa pinas YF23 na yan para nd na kayu magalala sa FJ nayan please..
@imfloridano5448
@imfloridano5448 2 ай бұрын
kim jung un and vladimir putin agree with this video 😁
Stupid Barry Find Mellstroy in Escape From Prison Challenge
00:29
Garri Creative
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
100❤️
00:20
Nonomen ノノメン
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН
Watermelon Cat?! 🙀 #cat #cute #kitten
00:56
Stocat
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
TRY NOT TO LAUGH 😂
00:56
Feinxy
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
YF-23 Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) - Paul Metz (Part 1)
1:41:57
10 Percent True - Tales from the Cockpit
Рет қаралды 52 М.
Consolidated B-24 Liberator | Great American Aircraft | Upscaled
51:50
A4 / V2 Rocket in detail: Turbopump
1:51:13
Astronomy and Nature TV
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Was the YF-23 superior to the F-22?
11:43
Australian Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 250 М.
YF-23 DEM/VAL Presentation by Test Pilots Paul Metz and Jim Sandberg
58:30
PeninsulaSrsVideos
Рет қаралды 304 М.
Iphone or nokia
0:15
rishton vines😇
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Apple watch hidden camera
0:34
_vector_
Рет қаралды 61 МЛН
Урна с айфонами!
0:30
По ту сторону Гугла
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Bardak ile Projektör Nasıl Yapılır?
0:19
Safak Novruz
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Samsung S24 Ultra professional shooting kit #shorts
0:12
Photographer Army
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН