@@MohammedHijab So brother, if I bring the quotes from the salaf who have the opinion that women's feet are not awrah, it becomes fine for me to share their picture on my X and YT account?

They don't justify you distributing the vision of ' awrah' of women to Muslim masses. They are just about casual, 'sight' of women without an active intentionality. The two cases are completely different (and that too exceptional opinions as you yourself have mentioned). Akhi, accept that you were wrong in this case. Nobody is 100% right. Or reply to my questions in another video. I would love to hear your counters.

@@tarrasbulba4408 why are people surprised that there is no unity in the ummah. Our scholars will never see eye to eye on every fiqh matter. Why keep bringing these issues up instead of moving on with what unites us: the Kalimah

may Allah ease our Ummah in these desperate times especially our brothers in Palestine may Allah grant them and us Jannah 🤲

​@@nayabHussain-jw8yr Ameen

You're following Saudi scholars blindly.

@@user-zb8mj9yv4f No and what's the point between this video and Saudi scholars?

@@thelawsless Saudi scholars are the ones who prioritized minor issues like Music, Face covering, and beard over the fundamentals of Faith.

@@user-zb8mj9yv4f What is the most fundamental article of faith? and what does it mean?

Ameen

You've spoken my heart out. By the logic brother Hijab has given, there is no sin to look at non-believing women at all

How do you propose bringing people to Islam. Wallahi if I hadn't already become muslim and was thinking about maybe becoming muslim now, then i read the comments of the muslims in these videos i would stay as far away from islam as i could.

@@Vicious12384able we bring people to Islam using halal ways. Using the ways our prophet ﷺ and sahaba used to bring people to Islam. If you think we should bring people close to Islam using ways that are relatable to them, then aren't you saying that the way of the prophet ﷺ wasn't the optimal way? That halal ways aren't enough, we must use haram too? Aren't you saying that ways allowed by Allah aren't enough to bring people to Islam? The jahiliya days of makkah involved almost every promiscuity you can think of right now. There were uncovered women at that time as well, and the youth were attracted to them as well. Musical instruments were also popular at the time. Free mixing was just as rampant. Did our prophet ﷺ use any of these to spread Islam? Did the sahaba reject Islam because oh no, it isn't being spread by relatable means? Haram can never be justified and is out of the equation. Alhamdulillah you're a Muslim now my dear brother, I'm really happy to hear that. May Allah keep your and mine hearts steady on Iman and hidayah. Ameen ya rab.

i am great noah, alhamdulillah!

@TheSayHeyKiddo it is not Haram to act or be filmed on camera. It is not Haram for a man and woman to interact with one another at a place of work and it is not haram to simply see women in general even if they are non muslim and do not adhere to islamic standards. While certain musical instruments being haram is a subject of differing opinion none of those musical instruments were used. Using media isn't a haram way of giving dawah, the very fact that you know of Mohamed hijab and his youtube channel is evidence of the fact that you don't actually believe that it is. There are technological innovations that make giving dawah in this age far more optimal than in the time of the prophet. No one is saying you must do haram to give dawah, im saying the attitude towards basic things are ludicrous "why are there women in this" being a perfect example. With Muslims like this who needs Tommy Robinson.

i am great noah, alhamdulillah!

Salafism is a lie. Prophet Nuh and Luts wives were from the disbelievers as God says in the Quran. Bukhari is a man made book.

Well it's just in the Comments reality is different.

@@zahin2986Allah Help and Gude us.

Yes الحمد لله I'm really happy with I'm reading الحمد لله

i am great noah, alhamdulillah!

Sorry for judging, but your profile picture looks like a cosplay from an anime. Anime also contains haram if not most of it is haram.

@@Khawla-ic2th Thank you for the reminder. It's from a video game many years ago and of course i won't try to justify anything Jazak'Allah Khair

Wholesome response🤝​@@zackf6696

SubhanAllah you hit the nail on the head

This is interesting, he just called some salaf and the scholars sinners for having such opinions, this is insane

Capital A*, Allah (SWT)

so we shouldn't leave our house if there are women clothing in bad ways? I mean what he is portraying is not even haram, and if you find it to be haram then you will just not watch it no?

Looking and focussing on a screen is different than walking outside while lowering the gaze. A story play expects your attention.

We should find a cave .

@@amjadrasheed444 thank you Brother. Common sense.

@@ExperimentalKana please don't compare necessity with something needless like this. The youth can be engaged without making films like this.

But at least he wasn't on date with her.

​@@mohdafnan8278 Shia

You watched it yourself. It not impractical to just listen

Did you even watch the video?

@@AnEclecticMind not going to waste 40 minutes of my time listening to someone justify an action that the entire scholarship of Islam clearly forbids.

Well now you know to not follow based on emotions and actually follow the truthful refutations of these charlatans that were made years ago. If you had an ounce of sincerity you would've read/listened to those refutations years ago, but people like them prey on your vulnerability and lack of knowledge. Wake up now before its too late brother

i am great noah, alhamdulillah!

Which messages?

Deviance ​@@nabilc1667

grow up

You nailed it😅

We disagree with them on this video and this justification. However, they are still our brothers in islam and we shouldn't mock them/Ali. قال الله - تعالى - : *﴿ لا يسخر قوم من قوم ﴾ - سورة الحجرات.*

@@YoussefAssemZahran2005 You should address this to Ali first when he said, “The religion doesn't belong to your dad or mother!” What brother says such words? Actually, @AbdullahAl-Masoodi2243 is completely correct. Ali Dawah needs Dawah. His sarcastic way of speaking is very strange, to be honest. I wonder if he can accept criticism at all!

@@am99899 I mean he can accept criticism. The problem is that the level of criticism is so weak which is the problem. Ali literally seems to get criticized and mocked frequently, by people that don't rlly know what theyre talking about and have a tunnel vision view of religion. Criticising Ali doesnt mean you have a tunnel view of religion, but when people are willing to mock the likes of shaykh dedu then it's kind of clear who's the problem

You can make the same argument about living in the west lol 😂 very easily the same argument could be living in the west or working side by side women etc

@@Oliwood_entertainment a muslim shouldn't actually move to a kaffir country (if they weren't already born there) unless there's a plausible need. This is a drama, there's no need or urgency to make it with women in revealing clothing.

bruh these women are not muslim stop ruining our religion please

@@Oliwood_entertainmentbut that’s for necessity, and either way they must lower their gaze even if they work side by side.

@@lussein1 exactly

I think it is directed to non Muslims and Muslim movie-addicts.

​@@Khawla-ic2thBut there still is haram, so it still is wrong.

Hijab has already talked about it in the video like going to the park or the restaurant is also avoidable.

300 according to Bring back dislikes

360 by now

427

534 as of current and 1.4k likes

it's not an good matric anymore, because now most people don't dislike the video even if they hate it. They just don't care about it.

You are an overzealous child, please leave serious matters of Islamic jurisprudence to those who dedicate their lives to it. Humble yourself my son.

​@HeadshotKillaa what's wrong with you? You either are idolizing these daees or don't understand islam. Attacking the brother who commented doesn't invalidate his argument

@@RazorStan 👏🏼

for his wife he protects as for the women of others there is no regard , where is loving for your brother what you love for your self

@@RazorStan Perhaps I'm cautious of the recent phenomenon of actual children and youth challenging daees / those who've dedicated their lives to propagating the deen. Brothers will go online and completely anonymously defame another brother who has placed himself in the public eye for the sake of Allah, over a difference of opinion issue. Calling them "dayooths". Wallahi I feel even if they knew the implications of this word they'd still use it. Without questioning their active p*rnhub subscriptions, these anonymous brothers satisfy their ego and play sheikh for a few hours online, without seeing the damage they're doing to those who only stand up for them and their future.

Lowering gaze applies to both genders. Infact when Allah commanded lowering gaze, he first advised men, then only women. Read Qur'an 24:30 & 31

@@BinuJasim I agree

That's a valid point

You only just clocked on? 😂 Typical ikhwanis lol

الحمدلله على كل حال للأسف ما توقعتها منه أنه يضع نفسه في موضع الشك أبدًا وحتى واثق من صحبته سليمة وسمعتهم طيبة ولكن قل آمين يارب أن اللي بيطالعونه ماينظرون في وجيه وشعور النساء أو أي من عوراتهن ولا يجيه ذنوب منها بل حسنات لأنه قد يجذب الضالين الكفارأو الجاهلين والله يحوله إلى خير ونهر جاري حسنات لا سيئات

آمين

وصراحة اللي قهرني أنه تكلم يقول أن أحمد رحمه عليه الله كان صارم مع العلم قال ما وافق آية 31 النور ﴿ وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا ۖ وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَىٰ جُيُوبِهِنَّ ۖ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَائِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَائِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي أَخَوَاتِهِنَّ أَوْ نِسَائِهِنَّ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُنَّ أَوِ التَّابِعِينَ غَيْرِ أُولِي الْإِرْبَةِ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ أَوِ الطِّفْلِ الَّذِينَ لَمْ يَظْهَرُوا عَلَىٰ عَوْرَاتِ النِّسَاءِ ۖ وَلَا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينَ مِن زِينَتِهِنَّ ۚ وَتُوبُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا أَيُّهَ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ﴾ قال جل جلاله إلا ما ظهر منها ولم يقل ما أظهرن شف الفرق لو قال ما أظهرن يعني عمدًا المرأة كشفته ولكن ما ظهر يعني انكشف دون أن تكشفه وقال جماعة من الصحابة منهم مجاهد ومقاتل وإذا ما خاب ظني ابن العباس قالوا أنها الثياب التي تظهر ولا تظهرها المرأة وفيه أدلة نقل كثير غير كحديث عائشة عن الركبان وهم في الكعبة أسدلة إحدانا جلبابها من رأسها على وجهها وأم سلمة نقلت عن حال الصحابيات ونساء الأنصار بعد آية الحجاب في سورة الأحزاب 59 ووصفت كالغرابيب السود وأيضًا ابن عباس في تفسيره لها قال أمر الله نساء المؤمنين إذا خرجن من بيوتهن في حاجة أن يغطين وجيههن من فوق رؤوسهن إلى آخر ما قال على العموم لو نأخذها بالعقل كيف لا يكون الوجه زينة وأنتم بكرامة القدم زينة ولا وحتى في الآية نفسها في سورة نور ذكر الضرب بالرجل فنعم كلها عورة وش المشكلة وبعدين يقول نغطي الكافرات لا لاتغطيهم ياخي بس احجبهم حاول ما تخليهم يستعملون المستحضرات إذا أمكن أقل شيء لا تبرر وقول نعم خطأ وأنا أجازف وحاول في المتابعين تنصحهم تجيب أدلة لغض البصر مو العكس جلطني ويقول أن الناس تشوف النساء فخلاص عادي ما فيه مشكلة دامه ظاهر في كل مكان لا تكمل على أخوانك يقول الرسول عليه السلام بعد ما أتو الناس برجل قد شرب خمرًا قال اضربوه فمنهم ضرب بيده ومنهم بثوبه ومنهم بالنعال فقال أحدهم أخزاه الله كم يؤتى به فقال عليه السلام لا تعينوا الشيطان على أخيكم وآخر شيء معليش أطلت صوت المرأة ليس بحرام ولا جدالها أو نقاشها شريطة أن لا يكون هناك خلوة والمرأة بكامل حجابها (أكيد أتكلم إذا كانت مسلمة) وليست متعطرة والرجل ساتر عورته ولا يلين قوله ولا هي تخضع في قولها وقولهم قول معروف يعني في أمر مهم والأمر الذي جاؤوا إليه ويغض الرجل عنها وتغض هي عنه فكيف لعاقل أن يقول بعد هذا أن أحدهما سيفتن بالثاني

@@raniahouda9858 شكرا لك يااختنا

كلام سديد أختي، جزاكي الله خير

The guy was literally not a producer of the show, not an actor .Literally I dont understand how in any way the woman were beautified. If you feel a sense of attraction then maybe lower your gaze. You cant lower your gaze if your treating a patient. He hasnt even done much wrong and you guys are exagerating bro . I cant lie i was thinking this wrong but the intention is good.But if you live in the west you obviously come into contact with non muslim females.

@beastfootball1782 This is our own fault if we think we, a man, can treat a woman patient if there are other ways or professionals to see or treat a woman. In an emergency situation, life and death, then that's different. For women, there are women, doctors, dentists, driving instucters etc etc. Also, most services being provided in Western countries there's are chaperone policies as well. If this is incorrect please advise. Thanks Are you saying that in this show, Ali dawah has no input? He's not the leader? The director? Producer?

Hahah same.

@Boo-sc9gz hehe won't do it because he doesn't want to cause more fitna

Daniel is too busy attacking muslims like shamsi who actually teaches the religion of Islam.

@@Abu_Idris people like shamsi are also dangerous to Islam. ☪️

Daniel is a waffler, he wont do this cos he aint sincere in refuting the wrong

Hence why Muslims are getting beaten up and destroyed everywhere. Non-Muslims are the ones bearing the flag of freedom for Palestine while we sit at home advising each other on music and "awrah."

U did not watch the full vid did u

@@Freestatue99 watched a part of it, I don't like listening to him anyway. I saw the evidence he gave. He basically became a liberal Muslim. You can try blindly following someone like him, but you need to be honest to admit he is wrong just like everyone else can see. Everyone is seeing through it.

@@musfiqurkashem8614 ok that’s y I said u did not watch the whole video u missed some important points im not saying he is not wrong or right

​@musfiqurkashem8614 , you didn't even watched the full video so you have absolutely no right to speak. Talking about liberal Muslim while Hijab is the one who defending the Muslim world from liberalism for more than a decade is kinda funny.

Actually there's no way to know what the Prophet (saw) would think. You couldn't for a fact say by Allah whether the Prophet saw would approve of it or not because we don't actually know because he is not with us anymore

@@the_weal_mawa you don't know of his character and his teachings? Based on his teachings and based on how he lived his life, based on how he reacted in every circumstance of his life you couldn't say that?

​@@abduljaleelsyed7874 The people here defending this show have gone astry from the sunnah so don't listen to them mate. Allah told us in the Qur'an that they are willingly deaf, dumb, and blind. May Allah protect us all.

So they force hijāb on the non-Muslims is what you are suggesting? 😂😂😂 That wouldn't even make any sense in the film/series. That would be more a meme than effective da'wa.

We cannot make compelling media if it doesn’t reflect reality. Mohamed hijab is being practical, all the people criticising him went through multiple steps where non Muslim uncovered women appeared in ads and thumbnails just to accuse MH of spreading immorality. Then they go back to Netflix or whatever, it’s like people have lost their minds!

​@@AshrafAnam why add non Muslims and liberals in movies.

@@AshrafAnam The other option is to not make a film with non Muslim women in it.

@@AshrafAnam just blur them lol.

Same feeling here .

Thank you

loool who did you think these dudes were ?? they have always been grifting clout chasers

You should take your own advice thinking you are more pious and knowledgeable than Hasan al-Basrī. Have some shame and fear Allāh.

@@AshrafAnam they asked Hasan Al Basri (ra) because they were earning a living. One is necessity and the other is...? You think Hasan Al basri (ra) would permit making movies with the kuffar like this...?

They are misguiding

Well you’re not meant to obviously stare at it. But in a public domain, where such women might be unavoidably present or you may need to encounter. Just use a bit of common sense.

No just because public display of awrah orbsuvh is happening doesnt justify mislims being allowed to look at it. These are very different my brother ​@SupermanOG

@@yusufrashid8875 I’m not saying it should be looked at. But what I’m saying is that in a public space, where such women may unavoidably be present, then you may inadvertently look and see it. Point being, men should then not look again / stare or look with a wrong intention. Unless you’re choosing to live a life like a hermit, then being in the presence of this is unavoidable. That’s largely the point hijab was making too.

​@@SupermanOGmaybe they don't understand "Let Allah be The Judge" in situations like this. It's like Haram Police, the more they learn the more they become judgemental towards other Muslim, not understanding. Bigger problem for the ummat are forgotten.

why don't you do that then? Don't you go out in public places like parks or you inside your home unless absolutely necessary?

In regards to the mouth the scholars differ. But on musical instruments there seems to be a consensus

How can you be convinced beautiful sounds in nature are Haram. Birds sing, water sings, wind sings, leaves sing.. Should we be deaf? Humans like everything else in nature love to make and listen to melodies. I believe it's only Haram when the words and meanings are Haram. Like degenerate and satanic western music.

That is why the scholars that deem instruments to be permissible actually agree with the strictest opinion that there is fundamentaly to difference between vocals and instruments

Sinful imitation makes light of the sin.

Is that what makes it permissible?

Unfortunately Ali himself is in denial about his own show being absolutely unacceptable and haram

@@OmarAlbani please do not speak without knowledge, go and educate yourself about this matter and realise there is tabard, ie difference of opinion

What are you doing on KZfaq bro?

@@saifklee178 I’m not defending harām ! Furthermore being on KZfaq isn’t necessarily harām think before just saying anything just because people you look up to are called out

we must lower our gaze, AND, we musn't create fitna by promoting haram ideas.

@@Swoleniobrother your pfp can cause fitnah also. women = attracted to men. Women need to lower there gaze too so help your sisters.

I agree but sadly even something as common sense as saying the earth is round will cause divisions because we as an ummah are too argumentative

@@user-op8fg3ny3j The earth being round isn't common sense, it is rather something that is learned. I'd argue common sense is what we know from birth. Regardless I don't see how this has to do with the issue here.

@@Umar-qy3bd either way, the point is that it is a factual truth yet stating that publicly will also cause division in the ummah

He's a bootlicker

He always does this whenever he's catching flak, he makes Hijab defend him in public

all muslimuslima need dakwah to do dakwah. these gentlemen are arrogant at times und robust. Islam is moderation

honestly bro reformist whilst claiming to be orthodox

Fricken hell man sad to see.

You’re truly mad for stating this

@@erfannobari906 if it was another Muslim they had on their radar they would say the same thing.

@@JoBlogz Mohammed Hijab has always been less orthodox than you think, you just haven't peeled back the layers enough. I advise you to read the books of scholars of the past regarding controversial manners that come up in his 'apologetics', you will find alot of disparity.

💯

Legit.

Allah isn't real grow up

I wonder who in the comment section told that "movies are inherently bad".

You allowed him to. It was people like you who created this illusionary principle that whoever doesn't side with protesters making fools of themselves in public, has no opinion. Don't complain now that you see the fruits of your ignorant efforts.

man like Andrew Tate 👽🗿

You only know him because of Palestine?

@@tgamez6789 No, I've been watching him for 7 years

But there is some inconsistancy in what M hijab presented. Evidces are for seeing, but the conclusion is about actively showing and spreading it.

Evidence from the Quran: (قُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ يَغُضُّوا مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِمْ وَيَحْفَظُوا فُرُوجَهُمْ ذَلِكَ أَزْكَى لَهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ خَبِيرٌ بِمَا يَصْنَعُونَ) النور/30 Evidence from the Sunnah: روى مسلم (2159) عن جرير بن عبد الله رضي الله عنه قال: (سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ نَظَرِ الْفُجَاءَةِ فَأَمَرَنِي أَنْ أَصْرِفَ بَصَرِي). وروى أبو داود (2151) والترمذي (2777) عَنِ بُرَيْدَةَ رضي الله عنه قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لِعَلِىٍّ - رضي الله عنه- : ( يَا عَلِىُّ لاَ تُتْبِعِ النَّظْرَةَ النَّظْرَةَ فَإِنَّ لَكَ الأُولَى وَلَيْسَتْ لَكَ الآخِرَةُ ) وحسنه الألباني في صحيح أبي داود روى البخاري (5240) عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ، قَالَ: قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: لاَ تُبَاشِرُ المَرْأَةُ المَرْأَةَ، فَتَنْعَتَهَا لِزَوْجِهَا كَأَنَّهُ يَنْظُرُ إِلَيْهَا Evidence from the Sahabah: قَال الْبُخَارِيُّ ج٨ص٥٠: وَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي الحَسَنِ، لِلْحَسَنِ: إِنَّ نِسَاءَ العَجَمِ يَكْشِفْنَ صُدُورَهُنَّ وَرُءُوسَهُنَّ؟ قَالَ: «اصْرِفْ بَصَرَكَ عَنْهُنَّ». The nonexistence of Khilaf on this matter: قال ابن القطان الفاسي في إحكام النظر في أحكام النظر :"(105) - مسألة: فإن كانت هذه الأجنبية الحرة كافرة، هل هي في جواز نظر الرجال إليها كالمؤمنة؟ أو أقل حرمة؟: يظهر في ذلك مثل المؤمنة، ولا أعرف خلاف ذلك، وإنما وجب أن تكون مثلها لتساويها في تحريك الشهوة، وتعرض الناظر إليها للفتنة، بل ربما كانت النفس بما تعلم من (هوى)".

Regarding the narration from الحسن البصري 1) It was only narrated by الدولابي, who was criticized by the scholars of الجرح والتعديل. جاء في ميزان الاعتدال للذهبي ص459: «قال ابن عدي: ابن حماد متهم فيما قاله في نعيم بن حماد لصلابته في أهل الرأي. وقال حمزة السهمي: سألت الدارقطني عن الدولابي فقال: تكلموا فيه لما تبين من أمره الأخير. وقال ابن يونس: كان الدولابي من أهل الصنعة حتى التصنيف، وكان يضعف». وجاء في لسان الميزان ص506: «وعاب عليه ابن عَدِي تعصبه المفرط لمذهبه حتى قال في الحديث الذي رواه أبو حنيفة عن منصور بن زاذان عن الحسن عن معبد الجهني عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم (في القهقهة): معبد هذا هو ابن هوذة الذي ذكره البخاري في تاريخه. ⦗٥٠٧⦘ قال ابن عَدِي: وهذا الذي قاله غير صحيح وذلك أن معبد بن هوذة أنصاري فكيف يكون جهنيا؟ ومعبد الجهني معروف ليس بصحابي وما حمل الدولابي على ذلك إلا ميله لمذهبه». 2) Another issue with the إسناد فضل بن يونس أبو شعبة ليس له إلا هذه الرواية وإذا كان التوثيق من الدولابي فلا يساوي شيئاً وكل من لهم هذا الاسم المفضل بن يونس ولهم تراجم في الكتب ليس لهم هذه الكنية ولو فرضنا أنه ثقة فهل أدرك غالباً القطان ؟ هذا محل شك فلا يوجد أحد اسمه المفضل بن يونس يروي عن غالب القطان إلا في هذا الأثر فقط. 3) And this opposes what البخاري narrated قَال الْبُخَارِيُّ ج٨ص٥٠: وَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي الحَسَنِ، لِلْحَسَنِ: إِنَّ نِسَاءَ العَجَمِ يَكْشِفْنَ صُدُورَهُنَّ وَرُءُوسَهُنَّ؟ قَالَ: «اصْرِفْ بَصَرَكَ عَنْهُنَّ». 4) If it was authentic, it is specific for temporarily seeing the hair of who you're selling to. This does not apply to showing and presenting uncovered women to the masses "for dawah", let alone showing women who uncover more than their hair and who wear tight clothes.

Regarding سمراء بنت نهيك: 1) Assuming it's authentic, she was old. As ابن عبد البر said, "she lived a long life". And she did nothing except enjoin good and forbid evil in the market, a place everyone had to go to. Neither does this apply to those who aren't old, nor does it apply to unnecessary free-mixing elsewhere. 2) She could be from the إماء, because walking in the markets was from habits of the إماء and not the حرائر, which is mentioned by عمر May الله be pleased with him. جاء في مصنف عبد الرزاق ص135: ٥٠٦٢ - عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، أَنَّ صَفِيَّةَ بِنْتَ أَبِي عُبَيْدٍ، حَدَّثَتْهُ أَنَّ عُمَرَ رَأَى وَهُوَ يَخْطُبُ النَّاسَ أَمَةً خَرَجَتْ مِنْ بَيْتِ حَفْصَةَ تَجُوسُ النَّاسَ مُلْتَبِسَةً لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ، فَلَمَّا انْصَرَفَ دَخَلَ عَلَى حَفْصَةَ ابْنَةِ عُمَرَ، فَقَالَ: «مَنِ الْمَرْأَةُ الَّتِي خَرَجَتْ مِنْ عِنْدِكِ تَجُوسُ الرِّجَالَ؟» قَالَتْ: تِلْكَ جَارِيَةٌ، جَارِيَةُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ قَالَ: «فَمَا يَحْمِلُكِ أَنْ تُلْبِسِي جَارِيَةَ أَخِيكِ لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ؟ فَقَدْ دَخَلْتُ عَلَيْكِ، وَلَا أَرَاهَا، إِلَّا حُرَّةً فَأَرَدْتُ أَنْ أُعَاقِبَهَا». قال ابن عبد البر في الاستذكار ٨/ ٥٤٢: «وإنما كره عمر للإماء أن يتهيأن بهيئة الحرائر لئلا يظن أنهن حرائر فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة ومدبرة». Making this irrelevant to the case trying to be justified. 3) Some weakened the إسناد, because there's no known سماع of حيى بن أبي سُلَيم from سمراء بنت نهيك. References: جاء في كتاب إظهار الحق والصواب في حكم الحجاب ص703: الشبهة السابعة والعشرون: استدلالهم بأن سمراء بنت نهيك وكانت تؤدب الناس، وتأمر بالمعروف، فعن يحيى بن أبي سليم قال: «رَأَيْتُ سَمْرَاءَ بنتَ نَهِيكٍ، وَكَانَتْ قَدْ أَدْرَكَتِ النَّبِيَّ - صلى الله عليه وسلم -:عَلَيْهَا دِرْعٌ غَلِيظٌ، وَخِمَارٌ غَلِيظٌ، بِيَدِهَا سَوْطٌ تُؤَدِّبُ النَّاسَ، وَتَأْمُرُ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ، وَتَنْهَى عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ». هذه القصة رواها الطبراني في الكبير، وهي ضعيفة؛ لأن يحيى بن أبي سُلَيم لا يعلم له سماع من سمراء بنت نهيك، بل لم يعاصرها، وإنما سمع منها أبو بلج الصغير واسمه جارية بن بلج، وهو مجهول، وقد حسن بعضهم هذه القصة بسبب حصول اشتباه بين أبي بلج يحيى بن سُليم، ويقال ابن أبي سليم، وبين أبي بلج جارية بن بلج، فظنوا أن الأول هو الثاني، وليس كذلك كما سبق. فالقصة ضعيفة من جهة سندها. وأيضاً يرد عليهم بما قاله فضل إلهي: «لم يرد فيه أن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - أو أحد الخلفاء الراشدين - رضي الله عنهم - ولاها على حسبة السوق غاية ما في الأمر أنها كانت تقوم بالاحتساب في السوق، وقيام أحد بذلك في السوق، لا يدل على تعيينه والياً على حسبة السوق». وأيضاً على فرض صحتها فالمرأة المذكورة كبيرة السن، ودعاة الاختلاط يبحثون عن الشابات، ويبحثون عمن تقبل الاختلاط، لا عمن تأتي لتحارب منكرات الاختلاط وغيرها، فلو كانت هذه المرأة حية لأدبت بسوطها أصحاب الاختلاط؛ لأنهم يتاجرون بالنساء، ويتخذونهن متعة رخيصة. انتهى وجاء في كتاب كشف الغمة عن أدلة الحجاب في الكتاب والسنة ص276: وهذا يشهد أن سمراء بنت نهيك كانت من الإماء؛ لأن المشي في الأسواق كان من عادة الإماء دون الحرائر، كما أسلفنا مما ورد عن عمر - رضي الله عنه - (لما رأى أمة خرجت من بيت حفصة تجوس الناس ملتبسة لباس الحرائر، فدخل على حفصة ابنة عمر فقال: "من المرأة التي خرجت من عندك تجوس الرجال"؟ قالت تلك جارية عبد الرحمن. قال: "فما يحملك أن تلبسي جارية أخيك لباس الحرائر، فقد دخلت عليك ولا أراها إلا حرّة فأردت أن أعاقبها". قال ابن عبد البر في الاستذكار ٨/ ٥٤٢: وإنما كره عمر للإماء أن يتهيأن بهيئة الحرائر لئلا يظن أنهن حرائر فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة ومدبرة. كما أنها كانت من القواعد يشهد لذلك قول ابن عبد البر السابق (سمراء بنت نهيك الأسدية أدركت رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - وعمّرت). انتهى فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة »ومدبرة.

@@personalprofile1939 not only. There was some evidence not just about showing but even touching; the narration about the prophet allowing the woman to lead him by the hand, for example.

Utilize the medium, but not the harams.

What are you thanking him for ? To make it easier for Muslims who felt guilty looking at women ,now feel like he is doing something halal. After watching this video so many men will not not try to lower their gaze like they did before. "It's hard to live not looking at women ,that's why i will look at women and not even try"

​@@Abu_TuesdayCorrect! What is this secularist nonesense??

@@EasternRomanOrthodox. wait who are you ? I am talking about my brother ,who th are you coming in middle. Roman orthodox

@@Abu_Tuesday I am here in Palestine with both my Christian & Muslim brothers, and I have the right to say it is haram! Even for us Christians arguing with women is haram, so why your guys having conversations with women in the park on theological matters, it is not their place!

Hyper Agreed

He can do it halal 100%, no women in the picture. He can act till his heart's content.

its the end of times so people lack basic comprehension, esp. in usul al-fiqh and understanding of the texts

@Recker1125 If someone wants to object then answer his points: 1) Discuss the evidences hijab presented in the video 2) then discuss the practicality of your view and to what extent you yourself dont apply it and why, can that same principle not then be extended? If not why not?

didn't you hear the fatwah regarding seeing the belly of the non muslim women

I just see that this opinion is too scary. It sounds like someone is gonna come to us. Watches CORN. And says "well. They are non muslim"

@@Recker1125 sounds like it or taking it to extremes isnt an evidence

@@Recker1125 brother it’s about the situation though, they were talking about during trading and stuff so like normal life situations where you r there for the purpose of for example trading and not for lust. Porn is only watched cuz of lust. But i get yourbpoint but the think is that how far can you actually take this for example because of this no muslim should go to the park for a walk or to the mall cuz there will be women uncovered.

💯💯🙌🙌

Evidence** not evidences.

@@Everest-nh3dl sure

"Seeing" is not equal to "showing".

@@personalprofile1939 if the evidences shows u can see then whats the issue?

@@personalprofile1939 he would then be practically showing a halal thing

Shows you were always a hater and waiting for a reason

lol. Regardless of the echo chamber here, the majority of common Muslims don't go hard on themselves like you. They send their children to mixed schools (in west or non-Muslim countries), go to public places such as parks where there is free mixing. Muslims have the obligation to lower their gaze, they understand it's part of Islamic etiquette & good manners to avoid free mixing as much as possible, but they don't think in a black & white manner like the guys commenting here. And I guarantee you, none of you stands a chance in debating Hijab on this topic. He made perfect sense. May Allah bless him. We need intelligent people like him, not some loud speakers who lack critical thinking.

Please refute his evidences Go on

Thank you brother. Jazak Allah khair.

Brother, calling any advice hatred means you'll never get better. When advice is said, don't misword it. Most of the people in the comments like and acknowledge hijabs works for the deen, but would hate it if his attitude changed like this. Hating something that's bad is good. A parent hates that his kids become sick.

just the first 10 mins it’s more than enough, don’t need to hear this long drawn out video to justify something they both know is comprising their beliefs

​@@BodyJab295 Who are they to advice Mohammed Hijab or Ali Dawah? How much knowledge do they have exactly?

​@@nanonorthlabs3375Why are you here then? To seek attention? Fear Allāh and get off KZfaq.

@@AshrafAnam "who are they to advice x and y" is pure arrogance by x and y, and in the case of u, it is you being subjective. Advice is advice, truth is truth. If the imam that memorised the whole quran made a mistake in prayer, a 6 year old kid can correct him.

Learn your Jurisprudence from the 4 madhahib, and not from any famous person.

​@adelow 4 madhaib are man made. Uzbek hadith book (Bukhari) is not the book of Allah. Sahaba are not infallible. Quran has many examples of Noahs son and wife, Luts wife being misguided. Muslims have abandoned the Quran for the works of men.

​@@INFP5w4 shaba are not infalliable but we know what they are doing is good because Allah is pleased with them so we take from them as a kind of evidence, not as we take from the prophet directly on an issue , We know that there are man made but follow the evidence for what they said and differences, they did most of the work etc

@@ibrahimusrii8695 *before the death of Muhammad SAW. We all know what happened after that

its the end of times so people lack basic comprehension, esp. in usul al-fiqh and understanding of the texts

He isn't it doing it for Money but for Dawah TO non muslims, simply don't watch it

Are we not meant to follow the example of the prophet SAW?

Why do you want to make Islam hard for yourself?

Alhamdulilah it is literally a blessing that Islam is the only black and white truth and falsehood religion!

Mate please learn Islam, he's not Promoting Non Muslims, he's promoting Islam

no one is attacking him bro, you and him are just so triggered just because we said no this is haram, what is wrong with you??

@@isahak7 You didn't this video at all I dont even think you watched 10 minutes of it He's claiming this will benefit the Ummah however many people will still point out this is haram when they themselves indulge watching Netflix shows which contains elements of it being haram and do day to day activities suppose going to restaurants seeing women uncovered. He also gives references supporting his viewpoint and this series isn't primarily meant for muslims it's meant for non muslims who can benefit from this, how can you expect them to benefit from it if all it does is adhere to every single Islamic ruling??

​@@thenobleuchiha Problem is he is conflicting seeing haram and showing haram.

If this is the point in his video. There is so many flaws. I doubt it is. But what you said is elementary.​@@thenobleuchiha

@@somedonny8466 If you're going to claim that there are flaws then you should point them out akhi so I can try and respond

Who are these "brothers"? Name them

avg SPubs retard spotted 😂

I blame modern salafism for this close minded and rigid understanding of Shariah. As an arab I can tell you these saudi Scholars used to say TV, Bicycle, Camera, Football, and many other things were "Haram". We all know what happened after that.

@@user-zb8mj9yv4f they still think cameras are haram as they liken it to the artist who paints/draws. The only difference is they make exceptions for the portrait of the king 🤦

yes i love womens awras bro i dont blame hijab at all !!!

You are making excuses, this is secularist nonesense. You are no Muslims then

Let your sisters and mother interact with men freely for other purposes than socializing then. When men and women work in the same place it's concidered free mixing, yet they don't socialize there. This logic is so squiewed

@EasternRomanOrthodox. there's prescedence of this amongst early muslims, before secularism was imagined

@Samia_19 working in the same place is considered free mixing because of the unavoidable social aspect of spending an extended period of time together, so it is socialising. But since you mentioned workplaces, many muslim men living in the West have to work, out of necessity, with non-Muslim women whose awra is exposed. So are those men committing haraam?

Appeal to hypocrisy is a logical fallacy

@@fysmhmd7029 brother, sinning is one thing, but normalizing and justifying - even a sinner recognises its nefariousness and feels defensive about it, especially when the the perpetrator is someone we hold in high esteem and see as a role model of sorts.

the prophet time is different than this time, when music was kind of an event etc not everyday life interaction

evidence for your bogus claims that "..MANY prophets having goups that had gatherings of music and Dancing girls.." ..?!

@@Omar-qn1uj I think you misread I'm talking about the kufar having this groups I'm using this to discredit what's being said in the video in relation to giving dawah in a manner according to the day an age u live in and the society ur in, my point was prophets peace be on them all were in society where bad practices took place but they gave dawah in a uniform consistent manner across all ages and societies they did not alter their manner of dawah to appease the non believers

hopefully you're sarcastic

I'm a bit confused. Isn't the concept of seeing women's hair and neck the same as looking at a nudist? Obviously looking at a naked person is far worse. But the idea of both is that the women's awrah is seen but just alot more when it's a naked person compared to one jist showing hair and neck. Which then begs the question, where is the limit to how much of a women awrah we can see? Or can we see even any?

@@IA67676 Mohammad Hijab won't be able to be consistent. Check my replies to the pinned comment. I translated the refutation to all of his points بفضل الله.

Brainrot comment

@@bluepoison004 You sound like a 13 year old fanboy. Open your mind instead of blindly following Muslim celebrities who twist the deen.

@@la_illaha_ill_allah have you actually watched the whole 40mins video sir?

@@la_illaha_ill_allah no response?

@@bluepoison004 discourteous reply

Regarding the narration from الحسن البصري 1) It was only narrated by الدولابي, who was criticized by the scholars of الجرح والتعديل. جاء في ميزان الاعتدال للذهبي ص459: «قال ابن عدي: ابن حماد متهم فيما قاله في نعيم بن حماد لصلابته في أهل الرأي. وقال حمزة السهمي: سألت الدارقطني عن الدولابي فقال: تكلموا فيه لما تبين من أمره الأخير. وقال ابن يونس: كان الدولابي من أهل الصنعة حتى التصنيف، وكان يضعف». وجاء في لسان الميزان ص506: «وعاب عليه ابن عَدِي تعصبه المفرط لمذهبه حتى قال في الحديث الذي رواه أبو حنيفة عن منصور بن زاذان عن الحسن عن معبد الجهني عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم (في القهقهة): معبد هذا هو ابن هوذة الذي ذكره البخاري في تاريخه. ⦗٥٠٧⦘ قال ابن عَدِي: وهذا الذي قاله غير صحيح وذلك أن معبد بن هوذة أنصاري فكيف يكون جهنيا؟ ومعبد الجهني معروف ليس بصحابي وما حمل الدولابي على ذلك إلا ميله لمذهبه». 2) Another issue with the إسناد فضل بن يونس أبو شعبة ليس له إلا هذه الرواية وإذا كان التوثيق من الدولابي فلا يساوي شيئاً وكل من لهم هذا الاسم المفضل بن يونس ولهم تراجم في الكتب ليس لهم هذه الكنية ولو فرضنا أنه ثقة فهل أدرك غالباً القطان ؟ هذا محل شك فلا يوجد أحد اسمه المفضل بن يونس يروي عن غالب القطان إلا في هذا الأثر فقط. 3) And this opposes what البخاري narrated قَال الْبُخَارِيُّ ج٨ص٥٠: وَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي الحَسَنِ، لِلْحَسَنِ: إِنَّ نِسَاءَ العَجَمِ يَكْشِفْنَ صُدُورَهُنَّ وَرُءُوسَهُنَّ؟ قَالَ: «اصْرِفْ بَصَرَكَ عَنْهُنَّ». 4) If it was authentic, it is specific for temporarily seeing the hair of who you're selling to. This does not apply to showing and presenting uncovered women to the masses "for dawah", let alone showing women who uncover more than their hair and who wear tight clothes.

Regarding سمراء بنت نهيك: 1) Assuming it's authentic, she was old. As ابن عبد البر said, "she lived a long life". And she did nothing except enjoin good and forbid evil in the market, a place everyone had to go to. Neither does this apply to those who aren't old, nor does it apply to unnecessary free-mixing elsewhere. 2) She could be from the إماء, because walking in the markets was from habits of the إماء and not the حرائر, which is mentioned by عمر May الله be pleased with him. جاء في مصنف عبد الرزاق ص135: ٥٠٦٢ - عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، أَنَّ صَفِيَّةَ بِنْتَ أَبِي عُبَيْدٍ، حَدَّثَتْهُ أَنَّ عُمَرَ رَأَى وَهُوَ يَخْطُبُ النَّاسَ أَمَةً خَرَجَتْ مِنْ بَيْتِ حَفْصَةَ تَجُوسُ النَّاسَ مُلْتَبِسَةً لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ، فَلَمَّا انْصَرَفَ دَخَلَ عَلَى حَفْصَةَ ابْنَةِ عُمَرَ، فَقَالَ: «مَنِ الْمَرْأَةُ الَّتِي خَرَجَتْ مِنْ عِنْدِكِ تَجُوسُ الرِّجَالَ؟» قَالَتْ: تِلْكَ جَارِيَةٌ، جَارِيَةُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ قَالَ: «فَمَا يَحْمِلُكِ أَنْ تُلْبِسِي جَارِيَةَ أَخِيكِ لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ؟ فَقَدْ دَخَلْتُ عَلَيْكِ، وَلَا أَرَاهَا، إِلَّا حُرَّةً فَأَرَدْتُ أَنْ أُعَاقِبَهَا». قال ابن عبد البر في الاستذكار ٨/ ٥٤٢: «وإنما كره عمر للإماء أن يتهيأن بهيئة الحرائر لئلا يظن أنهن حرائر فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة ومدبرة». Making this irrelevant to the case trying to be justified. 3) Some weakened the إسناد, because there's no known سماع of حيى بن أبي سُلَيم from سمراء بنت نهيك.

Regarding Imam Ahmed's statement: There is no sane person who would say Imam Ahmed meant that أهل الذمة can be seen naked. He just differentiated between the عورة of a Muslimah and the عورة of أهل الذمة. As Hijab mentioned, Imam Ahmed has the strictest view on the عورة of a Muslimah, so he could view that the عورة of أهل الذمة is equivalent to the Muslima's عورة in prayer, or to that of القواعد (the elderly). But something to note is that Imam Ahmed views that the إماء (which were generally non-Muslims back then) must cover their face if they were beautiful without differentiating between Muslims and non-Muslims, and this applies all the more to the حرائر of أهل الذمة. Lastly, again, all of this has nothing to do with showing and presenting uncovered women (who wear tight clothes all over) to the masses.

Regarding إبراهيم النخعي's statement 1) He said "there is no sanctity for them" which is not true for أهل الذمة who do have sanctity. He meant الحربيين who their blood was sanctified temporarily by a treaty. 2) Hijab only mentioned part of the أثر in the references, removing the context. جاء في كتاب تاريخ ابن معين رواية الدوري ص331: ٤٦٤٩ - حَدثنَا يحيى قَالَ حَدثنَا عبد الرَّحْمَن بن مهدى قَالَ حَدثنَا سُفْيَان عَن مُسْتَغْفِر البَجلِيّ قَالَ سَأَلت إِبْرَاهِيم قَالَ فَقلت إِنَّا نُبَايِع العلوج بِهَذِهِ الكرابيس فنرى بطونهن وأشعارهن فَقَالَ لَيست لَهُنَّ حُرْمَة The questioner was asking about seeing them temporarily during trade. This does not apply to presenting them to the masses.

JazakAllahu khair akhi.