Absolutely! thank you for the update.

I have two big dogs. They have been on Frontier Pets a long time. Will keep them on it forever. Amazing food.

Thank you for the update! I wasn't worried but deffos a little sad for her - her presentation and facts were on point.

Yes. Thank you so much

Thank you!

@KSMI - Kerbal Saved My Insanity Absolutely!

Dont get me wrong, I’m definitely not in the right wage range to buy her product. But I would, for a fact! Animals are so important to owners now and for the same of feeding them the right things for $50 your saving thousands of dollars on vet bills from crappy food!

I do agree. Id buy it for my dog lol

Andrew never buys anything why is he even on the show

i agree i spend premium fund for good quality stuff for my dogs. not just which one is cheaper. Steve's view is too dismissive, not pragmatic and for lack of better word ignorant to the market tbh

YES. Like my dad would spend hundreds on quality cat food because the cheaper brands are so full of fillers, they'll just land your pets in the vet years down the line.

Hey my Cat has better things then me and I have no problem with it. Her reactions and love back is all worth it.

He can be such a dick

I feed my dog butternut costs me at least 100£ a month but I know for a fact that on average there's is less then a tea spoon of undigested matter on the backend

@@jerethgryphon4244 How large is your dog? Less than a teaspoon doesn't sound even remotely normal Jereth.

And then when people don't understand him he gets mad snd goes "okay I'm out, im out" 😂😂😂💀👌

@@jerethgryphon4244 100 a month?!? Wtf i pay 100 a week for my 2 dogs lmao. But idk i live in the US maybe its more expensive here lmao

Then why didnt they invest? You invest in someone if they know the product since that is everything.....she is a failure, they all said no and werent even close to investing.

No. I disagree with you mate. And you're right Kirk.

I can only see the clips on KZfaq here in the USA. I watch every single one.

I'm from the US and obviously watch shark tank Australia, but they drive me crazy because they shoot down so many good pitches. The US show invests so much more.

Sarah Anderson it may appear that way but the American Shark Tank has a big issue where a lot of the companies that make a deal on the show don’t actually end up getting a real deal once they get to the board room to write up the contract. I think the Australian sharks simply don’t have quite as much money while still being incredibly wealthy so they are more careful with their investments.

@@108willl That's the truth. Not many of the deals actually end up going through. The difference between the 'shark tanks' and 'dragons den' is that the tanks are clearly geared more towards pure entertainment. A lot of jovial music, sob stories etc That kind of stuff doesn't happen in dragons den. There is no "nice" dragon there. There's characters on both of the tanks.

Aussie version pitches alot of bs products that are not businesses, or even uniquely proprietary...us version calls that crap out asap.

delusional regarding conducting BUSINESS.

It’s cancelled

Green Lion there’s talk that it might come back next year.

I agree and I have a bachelor of Business. It helps cement my learning and gives it context. It also makes me excited when I realise I can understand what they are talking about lol.

Same!

I AGREE! This is a great show. Great cast. I love everything about it! And for that reason.... I'm out.

They probably didn't like the fact that she inhereted some of the money

Her costs are enormous - she basically needs a cool Million just to stay afloat with that factory purchase.

She wasted all that money on the production facility that she couldn’t even produce large scale from. Had she just found a contract manufacturer she would have saved a lot of money with the ability to scale easily

lmao

yes, would bring a different / fresh perspective to how and who they invest in perhaps.

All episodes are old. This show has finished man =/

@@kingdomperspectivesmindset5595 remember that their resources are based in the country the come from. That may not interest everyone.

They're already doing it in Shark Tank Mexico and Shark Tank Colombia

@@MarFutbolero damm right, I truely believe STColombia is the worst, they always want 40-100% hahahahaa, and rarely make investments

Yes. When he said she was trying to sell him hope, I would have replied "I am hoping for you to invest to turn my hope into reality"

He was honestly surprised!! 😮🎉

*get

Yeah but I mean there's a part of show-off for TV going on I think.. He's definitely entertaining and I would be disappointed if he acted in a more chill way like I'm sure he usually does aside from TV.

Robert Kiyosaki says he analyses a 100 deal to find one good deal and if he doesn't find it, he start the 100 count over. Once you start investing into businesses, you'll automatically become careful with your own money. This is their own money not them making sure viewers see high flying transactions.

@@jdrodrigues7 Yeah but Naomi LITERALLY invests like...1 time a season. She's a loser and shouldn't be on the show This deal was too good to pass up and they all passed it up but Naomi....man she makes the WORST excuses

@@jdrodrigues7 dont they also get paid to be on the show??? I'm assuming, like a lot??

@@badbadbeans6659 I don't think so. I think the motivation to be on the show is that they'll bring people directly to you with a product to invest it. Because as an investor it's hard to find small businesses and products to invest in but this shows cuts that out and gives the multiple to choose from in a day. Easy money for them if they make the right deals

andrew also

this probably is ethically sourced but just want to put a warning out about these claims. Kmart says ethically sourced on their webpage but then on a different part says clothes manufactured in Bangladesh. I'm surprised Fair trading hasn't prosecuted them for fraud. Bangladesh is the biggest offender of Sweat Shops and child labour as well as extremely poor working conditions. Once such place collapsed killing many workers. So carefully check on claims of ethically sourcing

My dog knows a little English. ;) :)

My dog started losing her hair after being on pedigree for about six months, I would like to make an offer

IDK I can't imagine there is that huge of a market for this dog food. Who has $150 a week to feed there dogs.

It's a nervous panic laugh. I still remember many years ago being forced by management to be at this party event thing, not at all comfortable in my skin there, and doing one. I can still hear it burst forth like I'd got a demon trying to get out, and I'm flushing with the embarrassment as I type this.

What does this even mean Australia vs US? Are they going to fight or something? They have a timer on how long they get to make a decision? They have one golden card which rules out all the opposing sharks from making an offer? And how do we then determine the winner? Do we come back in 10 years to see their ROI? I'm really not understanding what you're suggesting here.

I agree. She needs to scale it so she can produce more to lower the cost. The Hills Vet Science Diet is that price for about 3 kgs I think from Memory. My cats love it. My mother who has money buys it for them, there is no way I could afford it, but if I could I would. They love it. They aren't fussy eaters but they go ape over it. I mix it with other brands to last longer, as they'd eat a packet in one day. Ihave a continuous feeder for their dry food, and if there isn't enough of the vet science in the bowl, they stick their paws up to pull out more.

Im not sure what planet you come from but you would be mad if you think you can compare population of Australia 25 million to USA of 350 million. They dont invest because the market is to small and manufacturing of goods at 100% capacity would be able to supply and sell maybe 50 million dog owners per week and this will not work in Australia. Also its to expensive and it would add to $150 per week extra just to feed a dog.

@@coolercool3074 I did not refute the fact that Australia is a much smaller market. Simply the part that the Australian Sharks get put off as soon as they hear someone ask for reasonably big bucks. They simply do not have the depth in their pockets or the risk appetite. Andrew is the only Shark to pull off a $2.5M coffee deal as a very rare exception, while their average investments are in the $50-200k range.

Well it’s ultimately a question of percentages. If someone had a 40 million net worth, their investable assets are somewhere below that number. If someone pitches a chance to invest 400,000, it’s like a person with a net worth of 100 dollars spending a dollar, on the off chance it becomes 3-5 dollars in a few years. The vast majority of people will try to spend less on investments to ensure lower risk. With the rate of successful startups as it is, it’s hard to pull the trigger on giving someone more than most people make in a year without concrete proof of sales and a clear roadmap to profit.

They have and will make big investments, mostly where they split the deal between 2 or 3 sharks but they don't take chances on an unproven business at that high investment cost, its too much money to take a risk.

Yo

These Goldfish don't have any pockets, not an entrepreneur between them, simply out of work actors, repeating the same lines week in week out, I have watched my last performance , can't stand the boring repetition they blurt out every single time.

There has been a 2.5 million investment so....

She really needed to speak up.

It's not her, she's a bottom feeder. It's Andrew who never invests.

Robert Kiyosaki says he analyses a 100 deal to find one good deal and if he doesn't find it, he start the 100 count over. Once you start investing into businesses, you'll automatically become careful with your own money. This is their own money not them making sure viewers see high flying transactions.

Completely agreed. The irony is that now he probably stocks her food in his stores anyway, but doesn't get shit in terms of a cut

Some (don't ask me why) people will pay $14/4 oz. box of Keto crackers.

Agreed. His rant was so unnecessary and irrelevant

He is right, though. The MAJORITY of people won't pay that much for thier pets food. Some will laugh and buy cheap garbage for thier dogs, and others will say "I can start doing that myself". The rest are obviously wealthy, and can afford this overpriced dog food. I make my Dobermans food, cuz I want better for him, and I am cheap. 😂

@@ceeceepenington7320 yup, you made a point there. However, it's a niche product. The target market for this product is probably have different price sensitivity and point of view in assessing and making a purchase decision.

Gotcha, but a good chunk of humanity eat trash by choice o_o so, there's that

U add water, the water adds the extra weight

@@zwemtl both things she said included the water. she gave two completely different values. its either 3kg of water per kg or 2kg of water per kg.

Good catch. I didnt even realize that

@@pauladam9473 Nope, those two numbers referred to similar, but different things. One kg of finished freeze-dried product would turn into 4 kg of ready to eat pet food. Three thousand kilograms of RAW PRODUCT could be turned into 1000 kilograms of finished freeze-dried product. It is perfectly possible, even likely that the raw product is lighter because it contains less water and is denser than the finished ready to eat version is supposed to be. After all, she doesn't intend whatever to-be-freeze-dried substrate she calls raw product to be eaten, so quite possibly it is already partially dehydrated or condensed beyond what is best for canine tummies to make freeze-drying process more efficient (because there is less water to remove) or maybe even lower cost of transportation itself (she outsources freeze-drying as of this pitch so she obviously needs to pay transport fees and 3 tons are cheaper to haul than 4). So no, math very much adds up.

I presume she is freeze drying cooked pork and if not she just risked Andrew’s life. Two religions base their food rules on an ancient lack of understanding of trichinella.

@@peterd788 I hope it is pre-cooked.

Come to America where they refuse to enforce antitrust legislation. I'm kidding, somewhat...

Lol wrong tank

Imagine being so desperate to fish for likes and attention that you take your idiotic, obnoxious, pointless, irrelevant, cringy, juvenile Jenny spam to the Australian Shark Tank videos. Absolutely pitiful and sad.

@@Mogamishu wow someone needs a hug🍚🍚🍚

Barb's out, too...fyi

Andrew and Glenn are actually the richest and Naomi is the least rich on the show

You re an idiot, search before writing anywhere

@@bkirkbir it's a joke dummy.

You must have a sad life.

@@alixtheprofessionalcatherd6850 such a baseless assumption. Grow up.

good for you. you sound sad. must be really sad if a youtube comment section is where you come to get your problems out lmao. take that somewhere else

You're upsetting the snowflakes already 😅

@@TheRealTanSeeker lol. The amazing part is their lack of self-awareness as they exhibit the very petulant, shallow mindset that created our cancel culture.

anyone who thinks of their pets as there are children are mentally ill and needs help