"I never thought I'd live to see the day that a president of the United States would raise an army to invade his own country." A clip from the movie Gods and Generals, www.imdb.com/ti...
Пікірлер: 8 800
@stokerboiler7 жыл бұрын
When the real incident occurred, Lee was clean-shaven and dark hared. He grew a beard and his hair went white in late 1861. But nobody today would recognize a clean-shaven, dark haired Robert E. Lee.
@jakethesnake35933 жыл бұрын
being a general is a stressful job
@stokerboiler3 жыл бұрын
Lee knew this from his Mexican War experience. He had been almost a special assistant for Winfield Scott and had seen the toll it had taken on that tough old man. But for him his state allegiance trumped everything else. In 1861 Lee had hit that age when men tended to go gray. The beard was the fashion of the time. Lincoln had been elected as a clean-shaven man.
@MM-qi5mk3 жыл бұрын
I think he had a nice mustache in April 1861
@SStupendous2 жыл бұрын
@@MM-qi5mk Based upon?
@austinjones99702 жыл бұрын
The movies never follow history close enough. This would have been a great detail
@bobbyricigliano27998 жыл бұрын
There is a reason why Robert E. Lee was never prosecuted after the war, and why history has judged him so well. Regardless of one's views toward secession and the war, it was his actions after the cessation of hostilities that showed his true grace and character. Tens of thousands of rebel soldiers looked to him after Appomattox for direction. He could have initiated guerrilla warfare or dragged the war on for years in an insurgent form. But he took the moral high ground and told his men to go home. Rejoin their families. Plow their fields. Accept the outcome of the war as gentlemen and begin to heal. Ulysses S. Grant is also credited with achieving a peaceful settlement as the war ended. He could have humiliated and disgraced the Confederate leadership with harsh terms of surrender. But he let them keep their rifles and their horses and sent them home. The United States would be a very different place now if not for the actions of those two men at the end of the war.
@aleksandryoung22138 жыл бұрын
PREACH!
@TheJer19638 жыл бұрын
+Bobby Ricigliano Lee didn't get his citizenship back until July 22, 1975. He died stateless in 1870. President Gerald Ford signed the congressional resolution on July 24, 1975 calling it a 110 year oversight. If only he would have had Stone Wall Jackson at Gettysburg.
@aleksandryoung22138 жыл бұрын
It was both the first most tragic death in the Confederate Army to lose TJ "Stonewall" Jackson as well as Ironic for him to die by friendly fire.
@KevUrbie8 жыл бұрын
Hell. Someone who actually knows their stuff making a comment on KZfaq. I've seen it all now.
@aleksandryoung22138 жыл бұрын
America could use another Robert E Lee and U.S. Grant right now cause we're one hell of a mess.
@ViscidBeltUSA2 жыл бұрын
Lee’s ancestors who came from England were the first family of the Virginia colony of British America. This is why Robert E. Lee being a descendant of the Lee family was so attached to Virginia.
@TheStapleGunKid2 жыл бұрын
Yet some of his family members joined the Union. His cousin Samuel Lee was a Union admiral. When asked why he stayed with the Union, Sam Lee said _"When I find the word Virginia in my commission papers, I will join the Confederacy."_
@ninobrownish Жыл бұрын
He is still a racist, bloody criminal that subsisted on the proceeds of chattel slavery and its evils...
@test-20110 ай бұрын
no all the english left america for canada after the french won in 1776, robert lees ancestors probably changed their last name to an english sounding name to fit in he was most likely irish mexican german and black like all americans
@Apogee02UK10 ай бұрын
So his Virginian family tradition had existed for what..about a century? Whoopey doo! As a European I always thought all that civil war talk of honour and tradition as it related to states that had been around for barely a historical heartbeat was weird. Human Pride and Prejudice is a very strange thing.
@bigred32148 ай бұрын
HIS FATHER WAS " LIGHTHORSE " HARRY LEE WHO FOUGHT WITH WASHINGTON DURING THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND GENERAL LEE AT THE TIME A COLONEL ALSO FOUGHT IN THE SPANISH AMERICAN WAR A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY RARELY TALKED ABOUT
@emman101013 жыл бұрын
Basically Lee’s like: “Screw you guys, I’m going home.”
@markmazzurco1503 жыл бұрын
He's like this year belongs to the confederacahh
@roscommonman74593 ай бұрын
Respect my authorita
@MasteringJohn7 жыл бұрын
In a somewhat cruel irony, if Robert E. Lee had taken command of the Union Army, he could have ended the war swiftly and spared his homeland a lot of grief.
@grayc6367 жыл бұрын
lol right
@Jacob64437 жыл бұрын
But would he though? Lee would probably be facing the same pressure from Congress that McDowell did, which he means Lee would still be marching with untrained soldiers. Would the results still be the same?
@MasteringJohn7 жыл бұрын
Jacob Martinez The Confederate rank and file would be just as green at this point. As with all things though, great successes have many fathers. And many of Lee's were just as much due to having competent corps commanders like Stonewall. Still, I think having access to vastly superior numbers and material would make the war a lot closer to the "home by Christmas" myth that they thought it would be. Without Lee in command, Richmond wouldn't have been nearly as fortified, and on the Union side, Lee would be able to fight the war on his terms.
@edgarlabra127 жыл бұрын
Grave Wall he was too honorable for that
@MasteringJohn7 жыл бұрын
Edgar Labra Depends on how you define honor. If you read his letters, you'll know that he loved the Union almost as much as he loved Virginia, and if he wanted to save Virginia from the devastation of war, taking command of the dominant side and ending the war swiftly definitely seems to me to be the nobler option, however hard it may be to wage war on your home state. If the war had been ended with a few decisive strokes by a respected member of the Southern gentry like Lee, without any glorious victories like Chancellorsville to remember, I doubt the wounds of the Civil War would have been as deep. One thing that I'm pretty sure of is that the war would have been swift, if not entirely bloodless. With McClellan to build the Union army and Lee to use it, the South would have been beaten ingloriously, without any grand, last stands or faint hopes of what might have been to build the myth of the Lost Cause with. It wouldn't be called "the Civil War" or "The War Between the States" or "The War of Northern Aggression". It would be known as, "That brief time the Southern leaders collectively lost their minds, and ol' Bob stuck a boot up their nether regions and showed them what real Southern honor looks like". He would have felt like crap about it, and his contemporaries might have hated him for it, but tragedies like that are what myths are built on. Myths of the nigh demigod-like nature of the Founding Fathers gave national character to a people that once prided themselves in being Englishmen. Myths are powerful things, and that myth would have fundamentally changed Southern culture for the better.
@austyntona76079 жыл бұрын
"There is a terrible war coming, and these young men who have never seen war cannot wait for it to happen, but I tell you, I wish that I owned every slave in the South, for I would free them all to avoid this war." - Quote by Robert E. Lee
@bluebandit55864 жыл бұрын
I give this quote to every liberal I meet who doesn’t know history
@emc4484 жыл бұрын
Pretty ironic since Robert E Lee owned 189 slaves and treated them harshly.
@bluebandit55864 жыл бұрын
@@emc448 he treated them well actually. And they werent his, they were his wifes that she inherited
@emc4484 жыл бұрын
@@bluebandit5586 Yeahhh no he didn't and when he was instructed by the will to release them, he petitioned Virginian courts to extend the deadline. I have a source to this if you're not convinced. There is also a quote saying he deemed slavery beneficial for blacks.
@bluebandit55864 жыл бұрын
@@emc448 theres also a quote saying he would release every slave in the US if he could to prevent the civil war, sooooo.... You cant mount an attack on his character sir. He was one of the most inspirational leaders in our history
@JohnSmith-ym9fd3 жыл бұрын
They leave as enemies but still are respectful.
@rustyshackleford90173 жыл бұрын
Most of the officers on both sides were friends from the Spanish War and West Point
@theresafleming93743 жыл бұрын
I agree. Sadly, they are more respectful than Washington Insiders are now!
@Infernal4603 жыл бұрын
Imagine the Twitter spat that would happen if this happened today.
@exandious8673 жыл бұрын
This is a movie
@exandious8673 жыл бұрын
@@rustyshackleford9017 lol spanish war? The Mexican American war and the indian wars
@baloneychan4283 жыл бұрын
Lee: I don't want to lead the Army Lincoln: Thats why it must be you
@raylast38733 жыл бұрын
Funny thing to say for a guy who ended up leading the opposing army. Apparently he wanted to lead that one instead.
@raylast38733 жыл бұрын
@Jayden Dan Dominquez sure he didn‘t. Just like maybe von Mannstein and Guderian wanted to lead the Prussian Army, not the Army of Hitler. It just so happens that those turned out to be the same thing. Whoops
@dinkyb20003 жыл бұрын
And he lost Fucking traitor.....
@dinkyb20003 жыл бұрын
@Jayden Dan Dominquez im not just callimg it what it is. Personally I wished they had of killed all those Fucking slave owners they were an abomination of humanity the atrocities they did to my people was inexcusable period and all their descendants continued the shit with 100 yrs of Jim crow. Fuck them all
@rickybobby82243 жыл бұрын
@@dinkyb2000 you should spend more time reading and less time commenting. You have no frame of reference for 19th century senses of duty and loyalty which were to thier home states more so than the union. That's why it was no surprise that top generals stuck with the south. Not only that they were being asked to invade thier own homes. Based on your comments I know you are not someone to understand nuance and I'm wasting my time but oh well...
@pauljohnson33408 жыл бұрын
Duvall is a direct descendant of Lee. It fits that he played him the second time.
@acdragonrider6 жыл бұрын
Paul Johnson is that really true?
@cgavin16 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@sierrah24486 жыл бұрын
Paul Johnson Robert e Lee is actually one of my great great great great great great uncle somehow on my mom's moms family
@spartanwarrior14 жыл бұрын
Not a direct descendant but a distant relative whose ancestor fought for the Union
@Mr6stringchaos4 жыл бұрын
Robert E. Lee is a distant relative of mine. I get my middle name from him.
@conservativeme6 жыл бұрын
Robert Duvall is one of the greatest actors of my time!
@dannythomas4173 жыл бұрын
Much better than that washed up libtard De Niro.
@philmcnamara2993 жыл бұрын
I put em up there wit Bronson McQueen and Lancaster Duvall is a breed apart top knotch actor of the highest caliber
@dannythomas4173 жыл бұрын
@@philmcnamara299 The best actor of all is Duvall.
@meathead61553 жыл бұрын
You mean Captain Kilgore?
@dannythomas4173 жыл бұрын
@@meathead6155 He was a colonel.
@dantello10642 жыл бұрын
this is one of the few time where I dont see an actor I just see General Lee, all due too robert duvalls outstanding performance
@sadsackkvisling96943 жыл бұрын
Today they'd drone strike him in that very office and cause a "major tectonic event" in Virginia.
@jamesmiller53313 жыл бұрын
They would have put a drone strike on everyone pushing Rebellion before any state got a chance to vote on it.
@sadsackkvisling96943 жыл бұрын
@@jamesmiller5331 At least Lincoln woulda sent BLM to Liberia.
@sadsackkvisling96943 жыл бұрын
@@jamesmiller5331 Yes, especially the accursed brood of vipers known as Massachusetts, Maryland, and Rhode Island. Makes you bluebellies really chubby in the pants, don't it?
@jamesmiller53313 жыл бұрын
@@sadsackkvisling9694 I'm from Indiana myself 🤷♂️
@The_Real_Indiana_Joe3 жыл бұрын
This was in a time when the state was your country. The states only formed a union of countries.
@lukeporras12883 жыл бұрын
i.e. a confederation. The popular saying goes that, before the War, the United States *are*. After the War, the United States *is*. If the United States is a confederation of sovereign States, they can rightfully secede at any time. And if they cannot secede, they are not sovereign, and they are unduly ruled by the national authority. Many don't realize, but the outcome of the Civil War marked a fundamental Constitutional change in the United States. It wasn't a change in the Written Constitution. It was a change in the Unwritten Constitution, the Constitution of the de facto, the Constitution of Empire.
@The_Real_Indiana_Joe3 жыл бұрын
@@lukeporras1288 There is no delegated constitutional power for the federal government to wage war upon the several states.
@lukeporras12883 жыл бұрын
@@The_Real_Indiana_Joe Correct. Also read Article IV, Section 4. The federal government cannot invade a State without that State's consent.
@The_Real_Indiana_Joe3 жыл бұрын
@@lukeporras1288 And Article 1 Section 10, the green backs (fiat) finally negated the states ending in one jurisdiction instead of 51.
@johnuhtof89523 жыл бұрын
A beautiful statement that is misunderstood
@rickroscoe47348 жыл бұрын
I always wished Robert Duvall had played Lee in Gettysburg. I'm not saying that Martin Sheen did a bad job. But Duvall seemed born to play Robert E. Lee. He even looks like him.
@MeadeSkeltonMusic8 жыл бұрын
+Rick Roscoe He's an amazing actor!
@tpsu1298 жыл бұрын
Well, Duvall is related to Lee.
@Autobotmatt4288 жыл бұрын
+tpsu129 Real!? how?
@tpsu1298 жыл бұрын
On his mother's side.
@Autobotmatt4288 жыл бұрын
tpsu129 wow
@jakethesnake35933 жыл бұрын
"There's no way Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, or Kentucky will secede." Well, 1 out of 4 ain't bad
@lochlan2413 жыл бұрын
even then Kentuckians would've seceded had the union not plopped its army there.
@PeterPan541673 жыл бұрын
Fuck Lee , his choice dragged North Carolina into the shit !
@Arbeedubya3 жыл бұрын
@@lochlan241 Kentucky was so strategically important that Lincoln was supposed to have said "I would like to have God on my side, but I must have Kentucky".
@lochlan2413 жыл бұрын
@@Arbeedubya Whatever
@thomassnapp13413 жыл бұрын
2 out of 4.
@mikecarroll3538 Жыл бұрын
There’s an alternate History where Lee takes command of the Union army, and the war is remembered as an insurrection ended after the battle of Bull Run.
@Tadicuslegion787 жыл бұрын
It's a shame they haven't made a Robert E. Lee biopic with Robert Duvall as Lee cause Duvall is so great as Lee in this film
@shelbydawg41137 жыл бұрын
He outa be, he's a relative!
@VRichardsn7 жыл бұрын
Oh really?
@BRUZR667 жыл бұрын
Shelby Dawg I am also a relative of Lee and been Yankee the whole time. must have been the Irish cousins or something.
@Tadicuslegion787 жыл бұрын
Gods and Generals
@omni427 жыл бұрын
I think it wiser, not to keep open the sores of war but to follow the examples of those nations who endeavored to obliterate the marks of civil strife, to commit to oblivion the feelings engendered. Robert E Lee. A good man who served an evil cause.
@treycosper41369 жыл бұрын
Lee was not a traitor. In those times your allegiance was first to your state, then your nation - and he knew the Federal forces would be invading Virginia and he chose to defend his state. It was honorable.
@frellthat9 жыл бұрын
He wasn't defending his state. The secessionist government he supported was destroying Virginia. The whole western half of the state broke away after the governor claimed to have "lost" their votes in the secession referendum and "estimated" them instead. 150 years later, West Virginia is still separate. It's because of Lee and the government he supported that Virginia today is only half the state it once was.
@JohnDoe-io4ho9 жыл бұрын
frellthat West Virginia = Industrial Failure, Virginia = Economic Powerhouse
@Canandaigua19519 жыл бұрын
***** I suggest ypou read the US Constitution, Article III, Sec. 3..."Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.: Lee was a text book traitor. Far worse than Benedict Arnold.
@Canandaigua19519 жыл бұрын
frellthat - Actually, the creation of West Virginia was an unconstitutional act. Article IV, Sec. 3 of the Constitutiuon states that, "no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."
@frellthat9 жыл бұрын
Canandaigua1951 Congress approved the admission of West Virginia in 1863, making it constitutional. The legislature of Virginia claimed to no longer be part of the United States at all, therefore forfeiting any protections they would have had under its Constitution.
@TheStapleGunKid2 жыл бұрын
Out of 8 US Army colonels from Virginia in 1861, Lee was the only one who joined the Confederacy. Even among the 15 US Army Colonels from all Confederate states, Lee was just 1 of 3 who turned against the Union. Some people act as if Lee's choice was inevitable or the default thing anyone in his position would do, but in fact he was an outlier.
@johnmarcucci1719 Жыл бұрын
Perhaps so, but unlike a lot of other officers on both sides he was acting out of heartfelt conviction rather than an opportunity for fame or personal power.
@TheStapleGunKid Жыл бұрын
@@johnmarcucci1719 But there were plenty acting out of heartfelt conviction who made the opposite choice, including his own cousin, Admiral Samuel Lee. When Sam Lee was asked why he stayed in the Union, he replied _"When I find the word Virginia in my comission, I will join the Confederacy."_
@johnmarcucci1719 Жыл бұрын
@@TheStapleGunKid and I respect his conviction, and I'm glad that I have never had to make a choice like that, between the homeland where I was raised and the nation to which I owe everything I have in this world.
@TheStapleGunKid Жыл бұрын
@@johnmarcucci1719 Oh I have no doubt it's an agonizing choice, especially since Lee initially said he opposed secession. But I just get sick of people acting like it's the only choice he could have made, or the typical choice to make among most people, when in fact many others made the opposite one, including one member of his own family.
@richardjames1812 Жыл бұрын
Over 28% of the entire US Army Officer Corps resigned and joined the Confederacy. It's a significant and relevant number.
@bbqbros36482 жыл бұрын
The president does not have the right to call in troops to a different state unless invited by the governor. South Carolina tried to negotiate with Lincoln, he refused. They tried to buy Fort Sumter from the government (even though it was already payed for by and for SC) yet the union refused. They warned they would take it by force if necessary- this is what Lincoln wanted. He admitted as much to Gustavus fox. The battle of Fort Sumter is often laid at the hands of the South, for taking THEIR land back from the Union (and they did it without a single casualty on either side.) How did Lincoln respond? A declaration of war. Lincoln admitted himself the war was about stopping the south from leaving and that slavery was neither here nor there. Lincoln offered to permanently enshrine slavery into the constitution in order to motivate SC to stay in the union. Lincoln arrested his critics and put them in jail without giving them a trial. He thought Catholics and Mormons ought to be stripped of the right to freedom of religion. He is easily the most overly praised / deified president. You can make statues of him being portrayed as a God but you can NOT in any way shape or form criticize him or his presidency.
@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Жыл бұрын
Well what do you think about the fact that the Mormons practiced plural marriage?
@ohioexpax15923 ай бұрын
The states didn't, and still don't have the right to secede and war on their own nation. I guess Jeff Davis, Bob Lee, and the others were a victim in the end of FAFO: screw around and find out. South Carolina only wanted to negotiate with Lincoln about setting up diplomatic relations. Stop re-writing history.
@attackhelicopter69227 жыл бұрын
Lee didn't want to fight against his home state.
@Snakepliskin763 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't fight against mine either.
@abrahamlincoln92803 жыл бұрын
General Lee could’ve been my general But he f up
@ashkash86863 жыл бұрын
@@abrahamlincoln9280 thanks Lincoln. Try not to lose your head in making statements like that. Or part of it at least.
@nandinhocunha4403 жыл бұрын
@@Snakepliskin76 if he fought against his homeland, he would be branded a traitor and if he fought against and won, it would be a big mess
@sumanadasawijayapala53723 жыл бұрын
He just wanted to fight against his country.
@RobertELee-be1nq9 жыл бұрын
this was a hard decision for me. But I think it was the right one.
@TheFinalParadigm9 жыл бұрын
Indeed it was.... thank you
@jessetrout43949 жыл бұрын
So... When will you lead the next rebellion?
@RobertELee-be1nq9 жыл бұрын
Jesse Trout when the government takes our guns.
@jessetrout43949 жыл бұрын
I will stand behind you for that one!
@RobertELee-be1nq9 жыл бұрын
Jesse Trout'MURICA!
@jamesh.57653 жыл бұрын
Robert Duvall should be honored with an Oscar for a fantastic stream of characters he's done so magically, namely a loyal lawyer for the Godfather. Robert E. Lee in Gettysburg, I think but not sure. A cowboy with Tommy Lee Jones in Lonesome Dove, perhaps his best work. Playing Stalin under a heavy load of makeup, an astronaut trying to save the world from an asteroid. A cowboy with Kevin Costner with a fantastic script using actual language as spoken in the late 1800's. I could name a few more works, but he was also memorable as a newspaperman in The Natural with Robert Redford.
@majoroz4876 Жыл бұрын
In my view, he is tied with Morgan Freeman as our greatest living actor.
@jamesh.5765 Жыл бұрын
@TheWoodIsPoo I may have confused with his Stalin movie, which was actually pretty scary. Duval acted in major Russian buildings during after the fall of Wall of Berlin. The movie was terrifying from the way Stalin murdered millions just like Hitler, Mao. I watched it one time, never again. But Duvall's acting portrayal of a sociopathic leader was something. I've always wondered how he felt being there as I'm sure he was being watched. What an insane world it must've been and still is.
@OutnBacker Жыл бұрын
@@majoroz4876 There are quite a few great actors these days. I include Denzel Washington. He has the versatility of Duvall, who can play any role. Take a look at Will Smith, too. He's not just comedy.
@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Жыл бұрын
Technically a comet and that was Deep Impact
@OutnBacker Жыл бұрын
Let's have a hand for Gene Hackman as well. That guy is off the charts.
@imperialguard282 ай бұрын
People really identified with their state more than The U.S. as a whole back than
@smartfox0073 жыл бұрын
"This movie is awesome." -Robert E. Lee, circa 2021
@robertrasa4523 жыл бұрын
Whats the name of the movie
@abren59743 жыл бұрын
Robert Rasa Gods & Generals
@thomassmith81403 жыл бұрын
@@robertrasa452 It's not worth watching, boring pro-confederate propaganda
@weyjosh52133 жыл бұрын
@@thomassmith8140 shut up gay harem dude
@thomassmith81403 жыл бұрын
@@weyjosh5213 I allow women in my hermen too, just ask your mother.
@v8Buster874 жыл бұрын
Having a southern general would have been a master stroke of political display, by lincoln. especially if he had won and kept the job the entire time.
@michalsoukup10213 жыл бұрын
Which he likely would. Lee and Grant were in many ways almost polar opposites. Lee was really in his best command in the field but lacked in overall strategy and political aspects of being a supreme commander. Also he can fairly be said to be perhaps too risk-averse. Grant was the best grand strategist of the Civil war and knew how to fight his army's corner in the politics to get supplies men and money he needed, and he was driven to end the war ASAP, but he was at best an above-average battlefield commander. And McClellan was a fine regimental and perhaps divisional commander, who was also personally brave (he did display casual disregard for his own safety when called for during the Mexican war), but his true great ability was to build an army for other men to then use. So if Grant gets his command early, has Lee to make the actual battle plans and execute them, and McClellan to build them both the Army of Potomac, then the war would be bagged and done with by 1862
@EnnuiPilgrim2 жыл бұрын
They had a southern general. He was George H. Thomas.
@bbqbros36482 жыл бұрын
@@michalsoukup1021 To be fair the Union didn't have to be as risk averse. They had more troops and more money.
@michalsoukup10212 жыл бұрын
@@bbqbros3648 it very much depend on who is lost and when. If substantial part of the core of carrier soldiers was lost in early war Union would be in BIG trouble
@gabeh7923 Жыл бұрын
@@EnnuiPilgrim a darned good general was Thomas too.
@ccorbin71282 ай бұрын
This vignette is most likely true. What is missing is that Lee’s hair was black, unblemished by gray, right before the War. Over the war years, his hair turned grizzly gray due to the stresses of that conflict. Lincoln, also, aged considerably durung the War years.
@deeg88492 ай бұрын
Lee was like so many in “America” (then and now) in that he didn’t believe in the United States as a country, but in his own State of Virginia. I think that anyone who believes in States rights about that if the country, then if the majority of those in said State feel the same, then they should not receive any benefits or power from the federal government. This is one of the core reasons why the United States has been held back from being a great country.
@victorm1527 жыл бұрын
honestly I think Robert E Lee was one of the most honorable men who ever lived. He opposed slavery and supported reunification of the North and South as One Nation, but he refused to raise the sword against Virginia. He never cursed, never drank or smoked, rarely ever lost his temper and commanded great respect and admiration among his man.
@PyonBoy7 жыл бұрын
I don't call that honor, I call it abandonment of principles. Staying out of the war is one thing, but he joined the other side and fought for a movement that aimed to preserve slavery.
@Pan_Z7 жыл бұрын
That wasn't their aim....
@PyonBoy7 жыл бұрын
Pan Z Absolutely it was. Read some of the declarations of secession by some of those states. By preserving slavery they were trying to preserve their economy as well as their social order which slavery helped to define.
@JohnDoe-il9ug7 жыл бұрын
PyonBoy two states in the south had voted and abolished slavery and the north had one slave state and this was during the war. only a small group of people had slaves and the rest of thd country had high unemployment and the people wanted slavery gone and jobs available and had the war been a draw slavery wouldve been gone in a mettwr of time. the south wouldnt let the north tell it what to do as no state should and should have the say in their state. this war wad about getting rid of state rights and that is exactly what it did.
@Pan_Z7 жыл бұрын
John Doe ^ 84% of whites in the South were not in a family that owned any slaves. Most were farmers of some sorts. Slaves were usually owned by the rich owners of large plantations. Many Southerners were against slavery for ethical and economic reasons, and many Northerners were even pro slavery (the North even had 4 slave states during the civil war). Clearly, the Northern states we had slaves would've joined the South in the Civil War had the war been about slavery
@jcnom66067 жыл бұрын
a rich mans war, and a poor mans battle
@laynedoyle16133 жыл бұрын
@@martincastro7406 there's a difference between wealth and rich
@laynedoyle16133 жыл бұрын
@@martincastro7406 there's a difference between wealth and rich
@laynedoyle16133 жыл бұрын
@@martincastro7406 are you kidding there just is you could be like Lee who aquired probably about a few million (maybe) in today's world which is considered wealthy but then you have the really wealthy prominent familys which I imagine around that time were cotton and coal families that proabaly were around billionaires in today's world that had alot of pull and tossed dumb money at politicians to back there plans
@laynedoyle16133 жыл бұрын
@@martincastro7406 to be honest not much has changed but anyway back at that the radical democratic party and those promonent southern families influenced the succession and there you have the Civil War where they publicized the reason to go to war as northern aggression (which it was) and the north well what ever lie they came up with anyway
@laynedoyle16133 жыл бұрын
@@martincastro7406 honestly I don't know about how much he got but from what I found Im pretty sure his fame and experience as a military leader was more influential than his wealth
@lanemeyer9350 Жыл бұрын
Robert E Lee’s father gave the eulogy at George Washington’s funeral (Robert was only 2 years old)
@freddy8479 Жыл бұрын
Washington died in 1799, Lee was born in 1807.
@jerry85g7 Жыл бұрын
@@freddy8479 So he was -8 at the time. He was still there.
@arlonfoster99974 ай бұрын
@@jerry85g7 The eulogy was on Dec 26 1799 in Philadelphia PA (then the capital) Robert E Lee was born Jan 19 1807, in the same county as G Washington. He grew up idolized Washington and the Patriots of 1776. He looked to Washington for examples and his father in law was Washington’s step grandson G.W.P Custis
@jerry85g74 ай бұрын
@@arlonfoster9997 Thx
@sheldonf Жыл бұрын
Lee lost more men than Grant overall. He fought to win when he should have fought for a tie. He did not have a universal view of the Confederacy. He rarely gave Davis suggestions for an overall Southern strategy. Grant was the superior general. Grant had 3 Confederate armies surrender to him. Grant won the war. Slavery was the worst ever cause to support.
@bbqbros3648 Жыл бұрын
Saying he was fighting for slavery is like saying the founding fathers fought for slavery- lee gave up his slaves before Grant. Both great men and generals but at least acknowledge him refusing to take up arms against Virginia was his primary motivation. Grant had GREAT respect for him and refused to let his men cheer at Lees surrender- he felt it best to be graceful in victory and welcome the south as brothers and countrymen again- hatred toward the south and the oversimplifying the complexity of their cause only makes for more division- Grant was at least a man of understanding- a great hero.
@sheldonf Жыл бұрын
I call BS to your comment. Grant freed his one slave in 1859. Lee may not have been fighting for slavery but the South's main purpose was to uphold the institution of slavery. State's rights to do what?
@aaronfleming9426 Жыл бұрын
@@bbqbros3648 Grant also didn't realize in 1865 that as president he would have to suppress a wave of terrorism across the south as former Confederate soldiers led organizations like the KKK to overthrow the results of the war.
@MrKajithecat9 жыл бұрын
Lee was against the Confederacy but he cared about his home state and would defend his home. He wasn't a war monger by any means, he wanted to solve this through diplomacy, unfortunately the rest of the country made up its mind.
@perhaps41076 жыл бұрын
Blazin Goomba your the problem with this country just because he wanted to protect his home doesn’t means he was a bad person
@stoachgiacco42066 жыл бұрын
Lòrd Tachanka that’s true
@stoachgiacco42066 жыл бұрын
* that’s not true
@perhaps41076 жыл бұрын
Blazin Goomba what in tarnation
@brandonselitetv14366 жыл бұрын
Stoach Giacco That wouldve caused chaos within the United States Army since Robert E. Lee was very well respected by both the United States and Confederate states
@bbenjers6 жыл бұрын
“Perhaps you know their mind better than they themselves.” Lol
@robpolaris72723 жыл бұрын
Pretty apt today as well.
@thomasjensen68733 жыл бұрын
An oath to preserve the Constitution of the United States of America at West Point.....is an Oath..
@billbillson50823 жыл бұрын
@@thomasjensen6873 - and that oath ends when you resign your commission, as Lee did when he turned down this offer.
@earlofbroadst3 жыл бұрын
@@billbillson5082 Not to mention the fact that the Oath to uphold the Constitution includes the 10th Amendment - which includes the right to secede.
@johnhud2536 Жыл бұрын
Lee wasn’t hung but they did take his home and land in Arlington where now sits the Arlington National Cemetery where Union soldiers that Lee ordered killed lay in honor
@waltersmith77423 ай бұрын
Stand your ground ! Thank You. Robert E Lee
@richardsuggs81083 жыл бұрын
Robert E. Lee had dark hair at the beginning of the Civil War.
@JSTRonline27 жыл бұрын
The Union forever, but I can definitely see Lee's reasoning for fighting for the CSA. "We need you to lead our army against your home, family, and friends" Yeah I think I'd have to think twice about that.
@Dafttar6 жыл бұрын
Well said. People are often quick to judge others without thinking about the complexities of the situation.
@ConstantineAndreas6 жыл бұрын
Slavery forever? Those aren't people I want as friends and family, who believe in that.
@lucasriddle55386 жыл бұрын
Constantine P Nah, the Union was objectively in the wrong.
@ConstantineAndreas6 жыл бұрын
Lol, I respect your troll game.
@lucasriddle55386 жыл бұрын
Constantine P “if you disagree with me you’re a troll”
@nickroberts-xf7oq Жыл бұрын
After Appomattox, Lee told his men to "...fold the flag and put it away, or else it will be devisive. " He also said, against civil war monuments, "...best to not keep open the sores of war. " 🇺🇸
@daryljay7057 Жыл бұрын
Eisenhower was a big fan of General Lee. That's enough for me! He wrote: "From deepest conviction I simply state: "A nation of men of Lee's caliber would be unconquerable in Spirit and Soul! ". Fulsome praise from a 5 star General of The Army & POTUS.
@streetgato9697 Жыл бұрын
That's just a Westpointer praising and showing respect to another Westpointer. Eisenhower would not have tolerated secession if he was in Lincoln's position. Eisenhower would probably have Lee imprisoned or hanged for treachery.
@prometheusr Жыл бұрын
@@streetgato9697 Probably, maybe, supposedly. Don't be a twerp communist your whole life.
@TheStapleGunKid Жыл бұрын
But let's not forget President Ike's reaction when a state rose up to challenge his federal authority. He immediately put it down with military force. Thankfully it didn't involve any shooting, but Ike showed whatever he thought of Lee, he was more on the path of Lincoln.
@dancooper6002 Жыл бұрын
@@TheStapleGunKid The difference is unlike the spineless slime of today Ike could respect Lee as a gentlemen. But what is FAR more interesting to consider is what would Ike have done in Lee's shoes? Hmm? He would have done exactly as Lee did.
@TheStapleGunKid Жыл бұрын
@@dancooper6002 No I don't think he would have. There's a common misconception that Lee did something typical that almost anyone else would do in his shoes, but that wasn't the case even in his own time. Out of the 8 pre-war US Army colonels from Virginia, Lee was actually the only one who joined the Confederacy,. Even among the 15 pre-war US army Colonels from all Confederate states, Lee was just 1 of 3 who joined the rebellion. So in fact, when it came to his choice among men in the same position as Lee, he was outlier. Over 100,000 Southerns fought for the Union, including some of its best officers, like Montgomery Meigs and David Farragut. This of course included many proud Virginians, such as his old commanding officer Winfield Scott. Even Lee's own cousin, Samuell Lee, as a Union Admiral. When asked why he stayed in the Union, Samuell Lee replied _"When I find the word Virginia in my commission, I will join the Confederacy."_
@jasonbean72967 жыл бұрын
god bless Robert Duval. that's how you portray a class act.
@jondrew553 жыл бұрын
Ok, so no chance he’ll be hosting “The Bachelor”
@larryroosa786 Жыл бұрын
He should have been arrested when he refused the order. Imagine how many lives would have been saved if Lee wasn't in charge of an army.
@kingorange7739 Жыл бұрын
He can't be arrested for declining an offer. And it was just that an offer. Any military official can decline a promotion which was what this offer was. Had Lee been arrested for simply refusing to fight against his own state, it would have validated the CSA.
@jonfranks69022 жыл бұрын
Props to the south and my southern brothers standing up to the federal government.
@TheStapleGunKid2 жыл бұрын
You mean standing up for slavery _"The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution."_ --CSA Vice President Alexander Stephens.
@josephmargetanski23792 жыл бұрын
How ironic that so many Southerners refused to stand up to Trump--another Yankee.
@conker2067 жыл бұрын
Robert Duvall has one of the best southern accents in film.
@jimquantic3 жыл бұрын
I think we get most of our accent from our folks--his Dad from Virginia, so I guess that explains it--though I don't really know a "Virginia accent" to be honest.
@foolslayer94162 жыл бұрын
@@jimquantic There's a rugged elegance to his accent.
@killertaco8themaster7732 жыл бұрын
You can tell he isn't actually southern but he's definitely far better than most.
@conker2062 жыл бұрын
@@killertaco8themaster773 He sounds Southern just in my opinion. I've lived in the South all my life and heard many older folks talk the way he does. I knew a lady who recently passed away who was 85 that spoke in the same way Duvall does in this film.
@Arbeedubya8 жыл бұрын
A minor point, I realize, possibly even nitpicking, but Lee didn't have a beard then.
@S2Cents8 жыл бұрын
His hair wasn't white either.
@johncombs29908 жыл бұрын
You're right. Lee didn't grow his beard until the winter of 61/62 when he was in command of troops in the mountains of western Virginia (now West Virginia).
@S2Cents8 жыл бұрын
I wish these movies would stick hard to the facts. Reality deserves respect and is always more interesting, and it is in the details. BTW, See "History Buffs" KZfaq channel for analysis of movies, what they get right, what they get wrong. It's fantastic. One of my favorites: Master and Commander.. and the episode on that is great.
@artm19737 жыл бұрын
I've watched his reviews. They're ok but the reviewer doesn't know his history so makes a lot of mistakes himself.
@Wallyworld307 жыл бұрын
I imagine they had him wear a beard here so he actually looks more like Robert E. Lee and less like Robert Duvall. In telling this great story his beard or lack thereof is more or less irrelevant.
@dougwalker1010 Жыл бұрын
"I never thought I'd live to see the day that a president of the United States would raise an army to invade his own country." Today that army is called the IRS.
@Phl-ou6vn3 жыл бұрын
Historians say he went to this meeting in his street clothes not his formal attire (uniform) with sword. The sword gets in the way when he navigates around the room anyway. It was customary to remove the sword at the entrance to a formal setting when sitting was required.
@AvengerAtIlipa9 жыл бұрын
Scene is touching, even if it is inaccurate. Lee resigned in a letter after a night of careful consideration at Arlington. He left the following morning.
@steve3dqe9 жыл бұрын
The Avenger at Ilipa Precisely. The dialog in this clip is fantasy.
@tpsu1299 жыл бұрын
Lee did meet with Blair. To compress an already 3.5+ hour movie they combined two scenes into one.
@AvengerAtIlipa9 жыл бұрын
***** Someone seems like their jimmies are a'rustlin...
@AvengerAtIlipa9 жыл бұрын
***** But the flag wasn't flying over the statehouse 150 years ago... ;)
@Jermster_919 жыл бұрын
Steve Small It is why the movie that the book is based on is Historical Fiction. The books is far better than the movie. A good 1/3 of the books is missing from the movie.
@paullianblantar24047 жыл бұрын
""I never thought I'd live to see the day that a president of the United States would raise an army to invade his own country." Wonderful actor, wonderful scene and wonderful words!
@paulbrasier3723 жыл бұрын
And yet it was the south that raised an army against its own country and fired the opening shots. They seized government properties and declared themselves separate. They soon found out differently, thank God or what we would look like today.
@HeadhuntexGamer3 жыл бұрын
@@paulbrasier372 America doesnt even look like America anymore, I dont think the Union won anything
@mohsinsyedain17542 жыл бұрын
Yet he was ok with treating people as beast of burden, slaves, inferior beings..Shame on him and double shame on those who hold him in high regard or have sympathy for him.
@anineh15512 жыл бұрын
@@HeadhuntexGamer what do you mean by America doesn’t look like America?
@spazemfathemcazemmeleggymi2722 жыл бұрын
@@anineh1551 look around you at tell me that this is what America is suppose to be.
@waynebeckham3807 Жыл бұрын
Colonel Lee was the leader of the rag tag group that ended Brown's Raid at Harper's Ferry. Years later, he fought some of the men he commanded that day
@turnerburn2442 Жыл бұрын
According to the book The Generals by Anderson and Anderson, this exchange occurred on 18 April 1861 in the townhouse of Francis Preston Blair. Blair owned a plantation in Silver Springs, MD. The commander of the U. S. Army at this point was General Winfield “Fuss and Feathers” Scott, who was deemed too old to take the field.
@Kunta19267 жыл бұрын
Back when your loyalty was to your state, rather then the all supreme federal government. Too bad it's not like that still might solve a lot of issues.
@jjj19517 жыл бұрын
People don't think about states today the way they did back then. Young people especially move several times in their lifetime depending on job opportunities. For most people a state is just where they happen to be living at the time and just a geographic entity on a map.
@LAVATORR7 жыл бұрын
And slavery! Don't forget slavery!
@mackdaddy22087 жыл бұрын
Okay Mr Jim Crow
@FragileBitch7 жыл бұрын
I'm no historian, But I could feel in that era honor, valor and loyalty was something really matter. Now, All that really matter was only Who can gave a man a best price to bought his service.
@teddymcfail43597 жыл бұрын
And that excuses the treatment blacks received because?
@JamesHampton03 жыл бұрын
This one scene adds so much perspective to the Civil War. I also believe it was Lincoln himself who offered Lee the position in person. And everyone should remember that at the end of the war Lee was saluted by the Union as an honorable man. We all have to come together before something horrible like this occurs again.
@THEEck50003 жыл бұрын
Lee owned human beings, far from an honorable man
@jordanjames26113 жыл бұрын
It should also be noted that Lee fought a lengthy court battle AFTER the war to try and KEEP HIS SLAVES. Fuck him, he was fucking horrible
@foxyrene13 жыл бұрын
C'mon guys, Slavery is horrible but in those days it was the norm. Today those people knowing what we know now would not have the same opinion. We have the benefit of television and the internet, these people had no vison of the wider world and they thought that because these people were not educated and were not "civilised" that they were not the same as them. it is very sad but I don't think this will ever happen again (thank god)
@jordanjames26113 жыл бұрын
@@foxyrene1 By your logic.....”Cmon guys, all the Germans were into mass murder at the time. It was just the thing back then”.
@lucassanchez90503 жыл бұрын
@@jordanjames2611 In all fairness, even by the standards of the 40s, ethnic genocide was a huge WTF, even by German standards, a huge step down in morality from the Germany of the past that, while housing anti-semetic sentiments, would never have gone so far as ethnic genocide as was done during the Third Reich. In 1860s, America, slavery, while horrible, was the norm.
@lisasimmons53623 жыл бұрын
I've never seen this movie, but I am sooooo glad to have seen this segment. If I didn't already know how utterly superb Robert Duvall is, I would certainly know it now. Even as Boo Radley in 1962's treasure TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, he delivered an absolute masterpiece of a performance.
@michaelj.acosta6810 Жыл бұрын
It is worth watching. I think this part, the Fredericksburg part, and Stonewall's flanking maneuver through Chancellorsville were the best parts of the movie. The rest, in my opinion, is a lot of soliloquy and boring introspective...hence why it didn't do as well as "Gettysburg".
@cellpat2686 Жыл бұрын
He looked so much like Gen. Lee it was like Duvall blended into the character. What movie is this? Loved the music too.
@yrunaked4 Жыл бұрын
@conspiracycornerireland3250 Gods and Generals
@LordTalax Жыл бұрын
Gods and Generals, 4 hours long
@johnl1091 Жыл бұрын
The movie is rather crap compared to "Gettysburg." The highlight in my mind was how well Stephen Lang portrayed Stonewall Jackson, but the film is way too sympathetic to the Confederacy for my taste.
@mickkimmings6186 Жыл бұрын
This is why they named the best vehicle the galaxy after him...
@johncarpenter35028 жыл бұрын
Robert Duvall is an awesome actor. Whatever role he takes, he assumes its identity.
@johnnysunday4027 жыл бұрын
"I cannot lead it. I will not lead it."
@Trackrace295822 жыл бұрын
Cause he’s a shit general
@slavaukraine51172 жыл бұрын
@@Trackrace29582 no he is not
@andresquinonezramirez9373 Жыл бұрын
General Lee never wanted to be in the union he always wanted to be a free soldier
@IdleWorker Жыл бұрын
Free to own slaves.
@andresquinonezramirez93739 ай бұрын
@@IdleWorker free to fight for freedom at that time both sides fought for the same cause just different leaders
@flamenco19613 жыл бұрын
He looked better in grey anyway.
@JohnnyRebKy4 жыл бұрын
Lee had dark hair and a mustache when this event occurred. He didn’t go gray with a beard until later. I dunno why movies always get this wrong. It’s a perfect opportunity to show how constant stress of war ages someone like Lee. At the beginning when this scene occurs Lee was a handsome physical specimen of a man. The war aged him but he never did look like a old elderly man. His hair turned gray but his face still looked like a man in his 50s…..not 70s
@cosminblk83593 жыл бұрын
That's intresting, because I've never found any photo with general Lee with dark hair
@JohnnyRebKy3 жыл бұрын
@@cosminblk8359 just google photos of Lee. There is a few from prior to the war. Lee had dark hair and a mustache. No beard. Lee was also not white haired at beginning of the war. He began the war with dark hair and mustache. It wasn’t until he took field command in 1862 that his beard would grow out and hair turn grey. Lee did not look like a elderly man during the war although he did age a lot by the end. Lee’s health decline started right before Gettysburg in 1863. Prior to that he was very robust and top physical shape, always upright without the slightest sign of fatigue. Summer of 1863 he suffered a heart attack and his health began to decline along with aging physically
@MyHenryco2 жыл бұрын
No, this was in 1961.
@notd0ll109 Жыл бұрын
Lincoln got it right with Daniel Day Lewis. Dude looked like he’d been run over by a forklift in that scene with Grant on the porch.
@deeznoots6241 Жыл бұрын
Because this movies only real concern is to be Confederate propaganda.
@timetraveltheory49003 жыл бұрын
One of the most underrated moments in American History.
@bernardosantos80203 жыл бұрын
Underrated as in massively important or massively unappreciated? Because if it is the latter I’m gonna kill myself
@moosemilk89563 жыл бұрын
And that's an understatement!
@bbbsmith26443 жыл бұрын
Is this actual footage?
@andhikarahardyanto66923 жыл бұрын
great men
@robertosaldias61813 жыл бұрын
in the history of the United States of America.. Canada, Mexico, Cuba, Jamaica, Brazil, Argentina also American territory... the originality of not naming a country does not take away from appropriating the name of a continent that bears his name in honor of a florentine navigator.
@histman3133 Жыл бұрын
The Civil War tore not just across state lines but also family lines as well. My great great grandfather fought for the Union and his older brother, my great great granduncle, fought for the Confederacy.
@Archedgar10 ай бұрын
His brother was a hero for joining the rebellion against the tyrants.
@histman31339 ай бұрын
@@Archedgar Well I'm sure he had his reasons for joining the Confederacy. I can only imagine what my great great grandfather thought of his own brother being on the enemy side and the potential that the two might end up on the same battlefield unintentionally shooting at each other. Long story short, my great great grand uncle disappeared after the war and, as far as I know, he was never seen again. My ancestors did own slaves so maybe that was a reason for him to fight, or maybe it was for Southern honour and heritage. Either way, I certainly didn't benefit from it. I grew up poor in Canada. Not poor now but I was in my youth.
@Archedgar9 ай бұрын
@@histman3133 Or maybe he fought for what the rebellion was actually fighting for; States' rights & liberty from the tyrannical and corrupt govt.
@histman31339 ай бұрын
@@Archedgar Could very well be. I don't have much information on his military service record other than he was a Lieutenant Colonel of Newsom's Tennessee Cavalry Regiment and he was captured by the Union at Bolivar, Tennessee on Jan. 20th 1864 and was part of a prisoner exchange at Charleston, South Carolina on August 3rd, 1864.
@Archedgar9 ай бұрын
@@histman3133 In any case, my respects to your ancestors (both) and to you as well. You are prudent & centered..... they would be proud.
@sgt_slobber.7628 Жыл бұрын
The Union would’ve been UNSTOPPABLE had Robert E Lee led the Army!!!!! But, his unflinching loyalty to his Home-state of Virginia won out!!!! One of the Greatest Generals in history!!!!!!
@joshuawillis602 Жыл бұрын
More like his foolish blind loyalty ended up causing a war to drag on longer than necessary and resulting in the deaths over 700000 Americans
@kingorange7739 Жыл бұрын
@@joshuawillis602 That line of logic could be used on just about any general fighting on the lost side. That makes no sense and you are relying on hindsight logic.
@joshuawillis602 Жыл бұрын
@@kingorange7739 no it applies strongly with Lee. He was extremely talented general and wasted his talents on an army that fought to have slaves. He knew what the purpose of the confederacy was
@kingorange7739 Жыл бұрын
@@joshuawillis602 As mentioned before, his loyalty was to Virginia. Had Virginia remained in the Union, he would have done the same. And considering he is still regarded as one of the best generals in American history with his tactics still studied, I would hardly consider it wasted.
@joshuawillis602 Жыл бұрын
@@kingorange7739 his loyalty should’ve been with the USA. His country. He easily could’ve stayed in the Union regardless what Virginia did. Many southerners stayed with the Union he easily could’ve done the same. Also his talents was wasted. Because instead of ending the war quickly with very few casualties it ended up dragging it out. Not only that it gave the former confederates and their sympathizers a false sense of superiority thinking they could’ve won.
@brothernick79647 жыл бұрын
"We could've pursued no other course without dishonor. And sad as the results have been, if it had all to be done over again, we should be compelled to act in precisely the same manner."- General Robert E. Lee
@1920s9 жыл бұрын
"Robert E. Lee was the noblest American who had ever lived and one of the greatest commanders known to the annals of war." - Sir Winston Churchill
@TranslatedAssumption6 жыл бұрын
Churchill apparently learned nothing from Lee.
@MrReidy19725 жыл бұрын
aye you may be right cause churchill won a war
@bruno51375 жыл бұрын
From Churchill's book "history of the English speaking peoples"?
@AlohaRaceTeam5 жыл бұрын
And we rip his statue's down with these snotty brats that don't know shit about history and labeled him as a racist bigot
@ShadowWalker19715 жыл бұрын
@@AlohaRaceTeam That's because people aren't kicking these snotty brats' asses like they deserve. That's the problem nowadays, people who stand for what is right, cower when they are bullied by these fucking snowflakes for fear of going to jail. You know what? GO to jail for assault, just make a stand for what is right, because as history teaches us, those of us who stand for what is right WILL have to fight for it every now and again, for there is ALWAYS some dipshit or group of dipshits standing for what is WRONG, and they will stand in our way of promoting what is right, and they will not move until they get the fuck knocked out of them and are FORCED to fucking move. My advice to any and all people who stand for what is right, is do NOT apologize to these snowflake morons when harassed by them, and physically fight them at every turn and time that they try and bully us, and bring violence down upon them like the wrath of an F-5 tornado, and when we have knocked out enough teeth, and sent enough of these entitled little dipshits who think that the world revolves around their little god damned opinions to the fucking ICU of the nearest hospital, THEN they will quit this stupid shit. They are emboldened to keep on with their antics by people not retaliating against them and always "issuing fucking apologies" to them. If I wear a MAGA hat for example, and one of these idiots comes up and knocks it off my head, I'm beating their ass to a pulp if possible, as it is a tried and proven FACT that PAIN from a solid ass whipping, is the best teacher of respect and humility out there.
@jhare40993 жыл бұрын
Duvall is the PERFECT choice for that role!!
@user-zi1ze2ks5o8 ай бұрын
He was only a Lt Col. not a full bird Colonel.
@alexscott7307 жыл бұрын
Do millenials know anything about integrity and moral principles like this guy?🤔
@StsFiveOneLima7 жыл бұрын
No.
@xavierwash986 жыл бұрын
Southern historical revisionists love to whitewash Lee by ascribing to him all kinds of noble virtues and characteristics he never had. Lee was a white supremacist who strongly believed that God wanted blacks to be slaves. During his life, he was notorious for his cruelty to his slaves. Revisionist Southern apologists love the false narrative that Lee inherited his slaves and then set them free. This didn't happen; it's one of those…oh, what are they called, those things that are the opposite of the truth? Lies! That's right. One of those lies propagated by Southern apologists and people too naive to read history. In reality, his ancestors freed their slaves in their will. Lee disputed the will and kept the slaves anyway. He did not free them; he was forced to release them by the Virginia court, which ruled against him in the dispute over the will. Another popular opposite-of-the-truth alternative “facts” repeated by Southern apologists and those who naively believe Southern apologists without fact-checking is that 30,000 slaves or former slaves fought in Lee’s army. This is absolutely not supported by fact; the historical record does show a tiny number of slaves or former slaves fighting in the Confederate army, but this number is only about 10% of what the historical revisionists claim, and it includes all of the Confederate armies during the entire civil war, not just Lee’s army. Robert E. Lee was a cruel white supremacist slaveowner who truly and sincerely believed slavery was Divinely justified and who took up arms in support of traitors. He also let his men kidnap free blacks in Pennsylvania to sell into slavery. So noble! I can’t help but assume that the service of Robert Smalls in the Confederate navy is probably representative of their attitudes and commitment to the Confederate cause.
@v.emiltheii-nd.80944 жыл бұрын
@@xavierwash98 Youre stupid!
@v8Buster877 жыл бұрын
Imagine how the south would look today if Lincoln had taken their Treason a bit more personal and got just a bit more angry and irrational....
@PastorJimmyParker2 жыл бұрын
You mean like what Sherman did to Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina?
@arlonfoster99974 ай бұрын
@@PastorJimmyParkerI think the South was more angry at Sherman than Lincoln. Personally I don’t like Sherman
@ohioexpax15923 ай бұрын
I understand why he did it, but I agree. Had The Union held southern politicians and generals (and other officers) to account for treason, and been executed, it might have changed the next 100 years. Similarly, had Rutherford B. Hayes not made a deal with southern Democrats to end Reconstruction in exchange for him getting an Oval Office, leading to decades of violence against African-Americans, maybe it doesn't occur, and maybe we don't have the south, 160 years later, still in denial over the war.
@ohioexpax15923 ай бұрын
@@PastorJimmyParker Uncle Billy did what he should have done: denied foodstuffs and material for the Confederate army.
@ohioexpax15923 ай бұрын
@@arlonfoster9997 I love Sherman. He knew the war wasn't gentlemanly, as many tried to say it was in 1861. He knew to win, you had to destroy your enemy and break his will. Had The Union had a general like Sherman and Grant available in 1862, instead of Pope, McClellan, Hooker, and Burnside, the war would probably ended in that year.
@Dr.Hyde1 Жыл бұрын
I know Lee Had joined the Confederacy souly to defend his home Virginia, But we can not ignore that our ancestors were one of the greats in history and Robert E. Lee was a Great General and though he was on the wrong side in my opinion we should honor those from both sides and heal from the past and move forward as Brothers of the United States Of America For Both South and North have shown greatness in there own ways and they yes each both have there faults but we can not forget the men who died for there families, Brothers, Sisters, Mothers, Fathers and so much more and God Gave us These Men to help grow our History and since then the U.S.A. has grown into a powerful nation but at the cost of being Corrupt, Evil, and we now show ourselves as not just freedom loving Americans but Americans that need help and our cries to the government have only been ignored whilst they don't ignore big corporations and such but no matter what happens Gods Americans who are full Of Hot Red Rebel Blood for over years has always made us what we are today and i say this God i thank you and i thank our Ancestors and The Founding Fathers for helping and starting this Country. -Mr. Jackal
@ohioexpax15923 ай бұрын
Sorry, we shouldn't honor any traitors. We cannot forget them, but they shouldn't be honored in any way, shape or form.
@outdoorlife53962 жыл бұрын
you have to wonder if when he was at Appomattox surrendering to Grant if this day played back in his mind
@horstreinhardt50237 жыл бұрын
Slaves were NEVER freed in the North during the coarse of the war. To be free, a slave had to escape all the way to Canada. The promise to free the slaves was just a political maneuver to prevent European nations, that had already abolished slavery (other than Spain), from aiding the South.
@TheBigg19997 жыл бұрын
Horst Reinhardt not quite the emancipation proclamation was put in place during the civil war and there were several black divisions in the union army
@soldadodesconocido51717 жыл бұрын
Slavery in Spain was officialy abolished in 1837, that doesn't mean, of course, that in some places far from the government wasn't still practised.
@horstreinhardt50237 жыл бұрын
The emancipation proclamation only declared slaves to be 'free' in states that the union did not, in fact, control. Once again, it did not free slaves in state under union control.
@jerrydickerson11117 жыл бұрын
as a southerner I have great Respect for Lee he was my childhood hero
@GiordanDiodato5 жыл бұрын
yeah he basically went with the traitors of the US
@ShadowWalker19715 жыл бұрын
@@GiordanDiodato The traitors to the US, was the US themselves. The Union broke faith with the southern states and their rights, and so violated their own constitution in doing so, and that is why the southern states seceded, which was ironically in DEFENSE of the USA's constitution with the attitude of, "If you will not honor it, then we will leave this despicable and tyrannical union, and form our own country with a very similar constitution that we WILL uphold and honor." It was all about states' rights. Unfortunately the states' right that was the main contention point at the time, was slavery, but even though that was an immoral "right" at the time, the principal was still the same, which was the rights of sovereign states to decide for themselves what was best for them, not the overreaching, overbearing, and tyrannical federal government deciding that for them, and that was the whole point of secession, to secure states rights and their sovereignty that the Union was violating, and we see the result of Union victory, which is that states' rights now are dictated by the federal government whenever the federal government feels like doing so, and one fairly recent example of that is when the Supreme Court made gay marriage a law throughout all states, instead of rightly allowing each individual state to decide that for themselves. There are some states who are opposed to gay marriage because of the obvious abnormality in nature of it and so would not legalize it, which is their RIGHT to do so, but no, here comes the federal government saying to hell with your state's rights, we're legalizing it in YOUR state, whether YOUR state likes it or not. That's the very tyrannical type of bullshit that the South was fighting against, so when one looks past the stain of slavery, which would have phased itself out by the turn of the century anyway by my estimation, one can clearly see that the Confederacy was actually the good guys in that war, for had they won, they would have secured the rights, sovereignty and freedom of the states in the CSA, and who knows, possibly the USA too, for the USA, if they had lost that war, would have most likely learned to tread lightly from there on out regarding states' rights, for fear of risking another war and losing even MORE states to it. Lincoln provoked the CSA by not removing and by sending even more troops to Fort Sumter by sea, knowing that Fort Sumter was South Carolinian soil, and that it would be seen as what it was, foreign troops on CSA soil, and that after refusing to leave when the CSA told them to, the CSA would then have no recourse but to remove the TRESPASSERS by force, which they did, and WHEN they did, Lincoln could THEN play the fucking victim and say, oh they fired on us unprovoked, when he knew damn good and well that HE provoked THEM to do so, just so he could force the Union to stay together when some states obviously wanted to leave it. The USA government then, was much like it is in modern times, in so much as it being deceitful, hypocritical, and fucking its own people over and then quashing them and playing the victim when called on it.
@vincentreyes61545 жыл бұрын
@@ShadowWalker1971 It was facts like that and individuals like you that have convinced me that the South was right. I was a Unionist throughout 8th grade until I learned about the true history and use of the Confederate Battle Flag. Mainly due to the Dukes of Hazzard. But thank the Good Lord I did, for I had blatantly ridiculed the South and Dixie for so long and accused whites who bore that flag "racist" and "KKK members." But once I learned the truth about the South, I learned many things about the South and those things I believed in. They were resistance to tyranny, resistance to taxation without representation, preservation of traditional Southron life, Christianity, state's rights, and liberty in general. I learned that the South wasn't really run on slavery, as only 5-6% of the free population in the South were slave-holders. Including 20,000 freed black men. Speaking of the Negro race, I learned that the Confederacy had black soldiers fight LONG before the Northerners did. Plus, the South actually treated Negroes equally as opposed to the North that was racially biased. And the Confederacy fought for the same thing as my home country of the Philippines. We both wanted liberty from foreign invaders (Spain, the Union, and Japan for the Philippines). And that was enough for me to side with the South. Don't stop fighting for Dixie, brother. Deo Vindice!
@ColonizerChan5 жыл бұрын
Honestly. Lee’s father was a ‘war hero’ of the revolution, gambled money away and left his family. Lee was raised by a single mother, ended up second in his class at West Point, became a fine soldier in the Mexican American war. When it was the government’s army or his family, he choose his family, unlike his father. And when the war was done, he sued for peace and was first saluted by Grant. Lee is a very good role model and a great person to aspire to be like: loyal to family, humble, and honorable.
@samoroth4 жыл бұрын
You're childhood hero, however much of a military strategic genius he may have been, was fighting and waging more war and mayhem against his own country to maintain an institution of human cruelty. MY PEOPLE, for whom he was fighting to keep in bondage and misery, were a pawn in your little idealized version of southern glory, you bastard. If you had the courage to maintain this attitude in a room full of educated black men who understand their 2nd amendment rights, I would almost have respect for you, coward son of a bitch.
@dennismiddlebrooks70273 жыл бұрын
Lee was never offered command of the entire Union army, just the Washington Garrison. There was no thought at the time that a large army would be needed to suppress the rebellion in the South. Lee was only a colonel and was outranked by many general officers, including Winfield Scott, was was in command of the U.S. Army.
@User_3210 ай бұрын
Lee did not outrank winfield scott dipshit
@shanebell2514 Жыл бұрын
Blair should have replied: "I never thought I'd live to see the day that a president of the United States would HAVE TO raise an army to invade his own country."
@cclayne9956 жыл бұрын
Some would say that Lee was on the "wrong side of the war" - but you can't deny that mans honor and commitment to his home. A true Virginian.
@TheStapleGunKid6 жыл бұрын
But how does he compare to other Virginia officers like George Thomas, William Terrill, and Winfield Scott? They chose to stay loyal to the Union.
@m444ss2 жыл бұрын
@@TheStapleGunKid It compares perfectly. They all followed their duty as they saw it. Had he felt this way but nevertheless taken the command for the rank the whatever flory might go with that, he would have been a dishonorable person worthy of our scorn.
@TheStapleGunKid2 жыл бұрын
@@m444ss But joining a rebellion carried out to preserve slavery forever does not make him a dishonorable person worthy of our scorn? I know Lee didn't join the Confederacy to preserve slavery, but that's what the Confederacy was fighting for regardless of his views, and he still chose to join them.
@TheStapleGunKid Жыл бұрын
@UCtPk7lp6OzgXQpGLolKUK3Q Nope, the Confederacy was formed for slavery, fought the war for slavery, and died for slavery. Their fight was on the side of tyranny, not against it. _"Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth."_ --Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens.
@DoctahToboggan69 Жыл бұрын
umm... he WAS on the wrong side.
@schymark83926 жыл бұрын
Duval does an amazing job as Robert E. Lee,as only has ever done in any role.
@JohnSmith-hw1vv Жыл бұрын
Lee missed out on a chance at being the avatar of thousands of people on twitter who couldn't tell you in what decade the civil war took place.
@TANQ317 жыл бұрын
A true leader. Not swayed by power or riches, but by honor.
@ShoreshFathi7 жыл бұрын
George Washington was a traitor ;)
@usa-israelncr-enclave7057 жыл бұрын
Shoresh Fathi Yes, he was to the British and the Empire that so decidedly oppressed and taxed them without representation. General Lee committed treason and lost for an ideology abhorrent to many, if not most, Americans then and almost all Americans today. Southern states had representation and could decide most taxes locally. The colonies revolted for liberty and representative government. The reason for the southern revolt, in large part, was the acceptance of non-slavery states like California into the Union that gave the majority in both the House of Representatives and Senate to non-slave states. They revolted for states right, what exactly were those states rights? To own, buy, and sell slaves. It was, obviously, part of a racist ideology of slavery.
@ryguy54367 жыл бұрын
+Shoresh Fathi Fuck you
@TheOlesarge7 жыл бұрын
The southern states were also being taxed incredibly harsh by the federal government for the agriculture and the Cotton. It was a build up, not just of slavery, but of other economic problems forced on the south by the north. Slavery, to be sure, was a scorn, but it was also legal in some northern states. The last state to abolish slavery was Delaware, a union state. As a matter of fact the Emmancipation Proclaimation only abolished slavery in the Southern Confederacy States and not in the Union. This war was over States rights, especially a state's right to secede from the Union, a right which is in the Constitution. Yes, it is better that the north won, but what most people do not know is that both Robert E. Lee AND Jefferson Davis, as well as General G.T. Beauregard, fought for civil rights for freed slaves in the south after the war and almost until the days that they died. Gen. Beauregard worked with Plessy on civil rights but never gets credit for the work done to promote the lives and liberties of the former slaves in the south. The States Rights were not to own, buy, and sell slaves, but to govern their own sovergnty as they saw fit.
@Darkless4X7 жыл бұрын
+Shoresh Fathi Happy Treason Day, you Ungrateful Colonials!
@RexGalilae7 жыл бұрын
I felt the thumbnail was a colorized portrait of Robert e Lee for once. amazing casting
@fload46d3 ай бұрын
Duval did a great job with the accent and overall comportment of Lee. Whatever many want to say, it is evident that slavery was the cause of the CW. The South took over federal property (post offices, etc.) and the North had every right to resist. But that's how we grow. Slavery was becoming unprofitable anyway and would have eventually just faded away. Hopefully we don't see a repeat of the CW. That being said, Lee was a great man even though he violated his oath to his country.
@emilg9496 Жыл бұрын
It's an obligation for decent human beings to end slavery and tyranny. It was then and still so today. It is that simple.
@cat-lw6kq3 жыл бұрын
Lee was very popular and highly thought of after the war.
@sumanadasawijayapala53723 жыл бұрын
Thanks to the Lost Cause myth
@generalfred94263 жыл бұрын
Ah yes General Lee the most overrated general in US history.
@CaugustusWhite3 жыл бұрын
Lee was one of the greatest men to ever live. Anti-Americans troll to discredit him because they are to ignorant to understand history.
@generalfred94263 жыл бұрын
@@CaugustusWhite Damn I didn't know that betraying the Union for supporting a slave society government was great.
@CaugustusWhite3 жыл бұрын
That’s because all you listen to is woke media and don’t know how to read or think for yourself. You can’t help it that your an ignorant F$&K, you’re just a product of your current environment. I don’t blame you at all.
@americanpatriot33447 жыл бұрын
Not many of you know this most likely but Robert Duvall, the guy in the video above who portrayed Robert E. Lee, is directly related to the deceased General Lee.
@Darkless4X7 жыл бұрын
Love that Spawn avatar there man.
@gotouguts20663 жыл бұрын
Robert E. Lee conducted himself like a true gentleman. Though he fought for the South and practiced evil in the form of slavery, he was not an evil man. It’s said he treated freedmen with dignity upon the abolition of slavery.
@BoaConstrictor1268 ай бұрын
Yes and he also supported a ban on slavery in Virginia at the state level before the war but was against the federal government getting involved in the issue
@ASonOfRevolution3 жыл бұрын
I'm here to set some things straight. Gather around, kids. I support not ALL, but many of Lee's actions. He was given the sword of George Washington in defense of Virginia. James Madison, another Virginian, founding father, and later PRESIDENT, wrote the CONSTITUTION, and the BILL OF RIGHTS. He is where Secession comes from. He put forth Interposition, Nullification, and Secession - explicitly in that order. Secession wasn't ILLEGAL until 1869 - look up Texas vs White - it's a Supreme Court case FOUR years after the end of the war. Secession was legal. Washington, who even put down the Whiskey Rebellion when he became President, would have endorsed the actions of Lee. Because he did the same exact thing to the British. Professor Walter E. Williams said "Those who label Robert E. Lee and other Confederate generals as traitors might also label George Washington a traitor." The Declaration of Independence, written by Jefferson, another Virginian, and again, later PRESIDENT, confirms Lee's actions. The COUNTRY of Virginia didn't secede at first. Lee's own cousin sided with the Union, as did many of Lee's other family members, including his own daughter. But still out of respect for him, went along with him. Because States were countries, supported by the 10th Amendment. Madison knew what he was doing. As for Lee and his comments of slavery. Yes, he DID in fact say slavery was beneficial for blacks. And it was. And before you convulse because of the "Racism" demons crawling in your own head, take a breath and step back and observe quantifiable, objective reality. By the point of 1860 we must examine African-Americans in America. They had been there since the early 1600's. At the height of the Atlantic Slave Trade, they were also being sold by Arab Muslims (also for HUNDREDS of years) in the Ottomon Empire, where they were physically castrated. Just like in the Ottomon Empire, which sold slaves AFTER the American Civil War, Africans were taken out of the jungle and placed in a complex, but yet semi-stable founded society. The parts of Africa most slaves came from didn't even invent a wheel - let alone complex social systems. They were the ancestors of people who LOST tribal wars in Africa, and were sold often by rival tribal leaders, as spoils of war. They didn't mean much to their own people, often enough. It stings, but that's life. Sorry people are offended by the truth, but Lee was right - the point was to educate them. They had never existed, yet alone created a complex society by objective, physical criteria. Not what the Cultural Marxists would decry as "White Supremacy" - just reality. They hadn't. Disease, warfare, starvation, cannibalism - they existed before Europeans or Arabs found Africans. They existed after the Civil War, after the end of Rhodesia, after South Africa - and they still exist TODAY. Slavery exists in 97 countries in 2021, and NONE of them are White. You people don't understand the difference between your own ass and your own elbow, let alone history. You always judge things by today's standards, buzzwords, or watered down, simplified narratives. A war is a COMPLEX thing. Judge things by the time. For example, Stonewall Jackson OWNED slaves. He taught his slaves to read and write - which was against the law at that time. He even built churches for them. During the entirety of the War, he FUNDED that school, and continued to until he died after the Battle of Chancellorsville in 1863. Jackson even had one of his own slaves petitioning to buy him.. Don't have a stroke and act like I'm whipping Black people - I'm not excusing some of the horrific things that happened to African slaves, Irish slaves, or so many others. But there's a reason you see Black men like Professor Williams have his position. As well as Black men standing with White men next to Confederate Battle Flags in the 1910s. They were brothers fighting for their lands. Nothing more. Most Confederate soldiers didn't have shoes, let alone own slaves. There's a reason many White men had a dozen kids. Because they were free farm hands. This continued in the South during, after Reconstruction - all the way up to World War II. Go visit the Revolutionary War and Civil War Battle Grounds. Many of the Confederate generals you all spit on, their fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers fought in the Revolution, and the War of 1812, and the Mexican-American War. They grew up in the original America, and their roots often pre-dated the Constitution - like my own family. Had they not been slaughtered by Catholics, German, Irish immigrants, and other men who were led to War - they would've been the ones to move out West, and the demographics of America would've been completely different. The Civil War killed off most of the founding stock of Americans - especially in Virginia. My bloodline is one of the few that survived all of those horrible wars. When I think about my ancestors, I think to myself very similarly to Lee about the horrible bloodshed they saw. A Union kept together by the bayonet is not a just Union, isn't it?
@ASonOfRevolution3 жыл бұрын
Also, look up President Eisenhower and why he kept a portrait of Lee in the Oval Officer, or General Patton and his comments about the Civil War - specifically Lee and Jackson. They were huge inspirations to him, as well as many other men who would later serve in World War I, and World War II. They did what they could, with what they had. It's easy to criticize, but take a moment, get off your horse, and imagine you're Jackson, marching 13,000 men 29-30 miles a day in the Shenandoah, fighting THREE armies - suffering a defeat (which is actually a tactical win, and the only loss of his during the War) - and manage to WIN the campaign. These men, they were the last of their kind. Grant is the start of what we conceive of modern military tactics in the United Sates - just grind the enemy down. Lee and Jackson stand out, as do many other Confederates. At the start of the War almost EVERYONE was using Napoleonic tactics. Then the reality of the technology came into play. A similar thing happened in World War I. The doctrines didn't line up with the technology, so it resulted in bloodbaths. Utter carnage. Which made Lee and Jackson stand out even more, was how they adapted to this premise, but with less infrastructure, raw resources, being blockaded at majority of their ports, and leaders and manpower they lost, that they could not replace.. All while the Union sent fresh off the boat immigrants to kill the sons of the American Revolution.. It's a tragic, sad, terrible affair that's been overly simplified.
@Prairielander7 жыл бұрын
I always agreed with the reasons as to why the south should have seceded. People argue it was against the constitution. Well the U.S. was founded on a revolution against Great Britain. You cannot say one rebellion is right whilst another is wrong. Even on the issue of slavery the fact that it was legal was the U.S. was founded you cannot suddenly change a contract then expect people to agree or stay with it.
@870Rem12gauge9 жыл бұрын
"Challenging our Constitution". Nowhere in the Constitution does it say a state may not secede. That is a real flaw in that document. But at the time the Founders could not have foreseen events 100 years ahead.
@KevUrbie8 жыл бұрын
Uh, the Constitution specifically says that 'states shall not form independent alliances or enter into confederation with one another'.
@KevUrbie8 жыл бұрын
***** Are you asking me, or the OP? In either case, you're on the net. Use it. Dont know whats up with this 'I disagree so you must show me' stuff. No wonder people today dont know jack, they cant even look for knowledge themselves.
@BUSHCRAPPING8 жыл бұрын
+Joe Smith i think it went without saying that the union could be broken by a state at will, even in this clip he calls virginia his country which i am sure is how the founders would have felt.
@BUSHCRAPPING8 жыл бұрын
Gilbert Van Buskirk i just dont feel they would have entered into a union they did not believe could also retract their state from.
@JoeyJoJoJoestarJuniorShabadoo8 жыл бұрын
+Joe Smith Article I Section 10: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility........No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. Pretty clear to me that forming the Confederate States and raising an army without the consent of congress was illegal.
@chaosXP3RT2 жыл бұрын
My favorite part is that Robert E. Lee, and most of the West Point graduates had never given Ulysses S. Grant an ounce of respect in school, but U.S. Grant would become the only Civil War general to never lose a battle. Robert E. Lee resented that for the rest of his life. I can't imagine getting special privileges all my life and everything I ever wanted only to get my ass kicked by a poor, slave-freeing, union-loving "drunkard" and not feeling humiliated!
@mdcclxxxi85092 жыл бұрын
Lee wasn’t even at West Point when Grant was there and Lee and Longstreet were best friends.
@shawnketterman89262 жыл бұрын
Lol, Grant lost a shit load of battles, Lee whipped his ass so many times, he just had more men so he kept pressing forward no matter the casualties
@mdcclxxxi85092 жыл бұрын
@@shawnketterman8926 Exactly, yet he’s regarded as one of the best generals
@shawnketterman89262 жыл бұрын
@@mdcclxxxi8509 I'm not saying that grant was terrible, he wasn't. But to say he didn't lose battles is ridiculous
@701delbronx82 жыл бұрын
Grant wasn’t that talented, neither was Lee really
@Joetheshow445 Жыл бұрын
2022: perhaps the government knows our minds better than we ourselves
@DLxFC8 жыл бұрын
If this were disney, he would have started singing about how great Virginia is
@landeny653 жыл бұрын
If this were Disney, General Lee would have been played by a lesbian African American female
@DLxFC3 жыл бұрын
@@landeny65 how much has changed in only 4 years
@JackieAprileJr3 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah. Gettysburg the musical
@guyincognito79792 жыл бұрын
@@landeny65 in what world do you live in i relly am curious.
@arlonfoster99974 ай бұрын
@@JackieAprileJr I will always rank Hamilton as the best musical
@TheRealEminemVEVO9 жыл бұрын
Happy Birthday General! Your spirit lives on!
@michaelandcarina_personal Жыл бұрын
He wasn’t an evil man, but as it says in Revelation, I would that you were hot or cold, but if you are lukewarm I’ll spit you from my mouth. He was personally against the institution of slavery, but had his slaves whipped when they run away. He tore this country apart for a time, and for what? State’s rights? Rights to do what? Exactly.
@HellogovenaКүн бұрын
This scene never actually happened. He wrote a letter to Abraham Lincoln from his home at Arlington House. “Sympathizing with you in the troubles that are pressing so heavily upon our beloved country & entirely agreeing with you in your notions of allegiance, I have been unable to make up my mind to raise my hand against my native state, my relatives, my children & my home” -Robert E Lee
@holinyx773 жыл бұрын
an excellent example of mutual respect. how far we've fallen since those times
@reinarforeman6518 Жыл бұрын
Exactly, we should mutually respect racists and slave owners, not point out how bad it is followed by them getting butthurt. Mutual respect is the future.
@clairestark9024 Жыл бұрын
@@reinarforeman6518 don't forget the guys who raped their slaves they deserve the most respect.
@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Жыл бұрын
@@reinarforeman6518 Nah, Got more future than you do 😆
@chattiermike140 Жыл бұрын
No respect for traitors
@NikasInParis_777 Жыл бұрын
@@chattiermike140 they were not traitors and the south did not fight for slavery read history as well as even if they did it still wouldn't put the south at blame like you think it does
@camp726scv64 жыл бұрын
Had Lee chosen to do anything other than to uphold his constitution and to do his duty, then he would not have been Lee and we needn't worry about what might have been.
@user-fj2zc9iz5u2 ай бұрын
But today is there even one descendant of slaves that honors the sacrifice of the men who died to free them? Just one?
@RJ-rn3uv Жыл бұрын
Robert Duvall of the best actors of our time. Truley an American Treasure.
@richardneely87584 жыл бұрын
I remember my great aunts talking about how their fathers and uncles argued about the coming of the war. They were strong for the Union until Lincoln announced invasion. My oldest great uncle and the only slave owner in the family went with the Union and joined the 1st Alabama Union Cavalry. My great grand fathers and my two other great uncles went with the South. They served the 51st Alabama Partisan Rangers and the 10th Alabama. My two uncles in the 10th were killed at Gettysburg on the same day. I love this image of Lee. Viscount Wolesley said that Lee was the only great man that he had ever met that seemed cast from a greater mold. After teaching Civil War and Reconstruction at University level for 40 years, it pains me to hear this crowd of ignorant talking heads disparage the memories of these me. Memory fades but let those who can hold them in their hearts continue to do so. We should honor all of the men both North and South. They were certainly more generous to each other than the perfect generation of the 21st century.
@brandonashley58722 жыл бұрын
Well said, my 3rd great grandfather also served in the 10th Alabama
@AndrewMRoots2 жыл бұрын
@@brandonashley5872 I wonder if he would have known Richard's great grandfather and great uncles
@brandonashley58722 жыл бұрын
@@AndrewMRoots it's entirely possible, stranger things have happened.
@lewstone54302 жыл бұрын
They were all traitors and should not be praised and I was born and raised in the South. It’s an evil place ruled by hypocrites.
@brandonashley58722 жыл бұрын
@@lewstone5430 just pointing out that George Washington was also a traitor, betrayed his country and government and the law, committed high treason the list goes on.... 🤔