Seems those would be more effective if the plates angled up not down
@bbbaalllss15 күн бұрын
Fun fact tungsten doesnt bend
@darylschreiber700421 күн бұрын
Had very little success against the M1 during the iraq war
@danielkaufmann771324 күн бұрын
Für mich kaum glaubhaft dass ein AP Geschoss mit 1050m/s dermassen wenig Wirkung hat.
@matthelord769525 күн бұрын
looks cool but sadly is insanely innacurate
@lecusz_2168Ай бұрын
This is strange, the PanzerGranate 39 7.7cm is able to penetrate almost all of the Sherman variants, including the M4A3 Sherman
@Rider-lo9vtАй бұрын
Ok, now this is stupid.
@froschreiniger2639Ай бұрын
apparently the hollow part is suposed to make darts less than 1000mm lengh tumble. But this simulation does not seem to account for that.
@robertwatson818Ай бұрын
This is not armor at all. The projectile goes all the way through and easily so. Is this some kind of joke?
@game-sf2oqАй бұрын
“most dense armour wins”
@EdrichLovesT80UKАй бұрын
Rip turret ring
@JuwshahaАй бұрын
Arjun use cow dung ..
@tonymanero5544Ай бұрын
With still secrecy surrounding laminate armor, and I know what anyone simulate the impact.
@CFox.7Ай бұрын
Those fonts, that music, the spelling mistakes !
@matthelord7695Ай бұрын
yeah your material seem extremely wrong
@jackvogenitz4284Ай бұрын
wtf is that angle of attack supposed to be
@neryve-olvera57232 ай бұрын
Bro the 2x sped up version the song is distorted 💀
@Rek1emMScar2 ай бұрын
2:24 This shit its good. For what i know Abrams SA like the one in Ukraine have the Tungsten Alloy armor that was dev for Australia instead of the DU. That Armor as show in the video have about the same Protection as the Gen2 or Gen3 DU armor. And only the most recently Gen4 its superior to the Tungsten armor dev for Australia.
@hyneksmid32932 ай бұрын
Im suprised that in DU it traveled little further than in tungsten.
@user-qy5em9xd2q2 ай бұрын
Good paint
@leonmilne71262 ай бұрын
Do water in an enclosed armour box
@flampard302 ай бұрын
What is that software?
@striek24862 ай бұрын
Name song pls
@Commando_224-jd7wl3 ай бұрын
Tiger 2 88mm vs sherman?
@marioxerxescastelancastro80193 ай бұрын
Interesting but the music is annoying.
@EVERYDAY_PAKISTAN_3 ай бұрын
Which software did u use ??
@saucy7433 ай бұрын
To be honest, the performance of the Composite armour in the 2nd simulation was quite underwhelming.
@ELPANZER-2-SOLDADO2770OFICIAL3 ай бұрын
Y por que no le meten ma sblindaje en donde esta la parte inclinada externa ?
@Commando_224-jd7wl3 ай бұрын
Pathetic as always against any kind of sloped armor
@Commando_224-jd7wl3 ай бұрын
That shell was outright pathetic💀
@jean-pierrevandermerwe76043 ай бұрын
Yay awesome, I asked for this a while back. Thanx 🥳🥳🥳
@kristian60733 ай бұрын
Ise vlakad xd lol
@roadgent79213 ай бұрын
This video aged like unpasteurised milk. Abrams are burning all over the Ukrainian battlefield. 😮
@dioscuro113 ай бұрын
I would like to propose a change for the simulation. Could it be simulated that the armor plates are not completely fixed? That is, one of the ends of the armor plate allows movement in such a way that its inclined plane changes when hit by the projectile. The idea is to check if the speed of the projectile crosses the armor plate without barely moving it and without modifying its inclined plane or if, on the contrary, it is modified by the impact, increasing the effectiveness of the armor against the projectile. I hope I have been able to explain the idea well and I hope it can be simulated. Thank you.
@dioscuro113 ай бұрын
I would like to propose a change for the simulation. Could it be simulated that the armor plates are not completely fixed? That is, one of the ends of the armor plate allows movement in such a way that its inclined plane changes when hit by the projectile. The idea is to check if the speed of the projectile crosses the armor plate without barely moving it and without modifying its inclined plane or if, on the contrary, it is modified by the impact, increasing the effectiveness of the armor against the projectile. I hope I have been able to explain the idea well and I hope it can be simulated. Thank you.
@Jun_mobileplays3 ай бұрын
The DS probably did more ☹️
@theforestita23763 ай бұрын
I cant take your name seriously with this music
@fazum3 ай бұрын
What about Stalinium?
@Chertanovo_centralnoe3 ай бұрын
Защита идет на курсовве +- 30°, не более того.
@roadgent79213 ай бұрын
Judging by virtually all of the Leopard 2's being destroyed bythe Russians, that this simulation video is hogwash. 😅
@Mp57navy4 ай бұрын
Work hardened manganese steel would probably beat all of those.
@TylerHarris-yy7uf4 ай бұрын
It's amazing how well steel has stood the test of time as armor.
@thedolt92154 ай бұрын
Love the English teatime music! Seriously, I do!
@Eng.S.T.I4 ай бұрын
Hi ...is this (ansys) program or application...and another question..what branch of mechanical engineering deal with this science ..is it applied mechanical engineering or metals and manufacturing engineering... please I want answers.
@CCP-Dissident4 ай бұрын
So war thunder wasn't really wrong about the shitty apcr shell
@RA_DIUM4 ай бұрын
What’s the music called
@marek34214 ай бұрын
rename XD to Extreme wrong Engineering Simulation
@30oooo334 ай бұрын
🤣
@jean-pierrevandermerwe76044 ай бұрын
Could you make a video with APFSDS rounds but with different materials for a comparison? Say steel, then tungsten, then depleted uranium!?