Im in operations

Good thesis! But the "there is hope" part still needs some work. The regulators regulated themselves out of the loop a long time ago. We might need to take care of the climate and the environment a bit, we have a small war problem and a small poverty problem and the key skill of the people making the relevant decisions is tax avoidance. That I bankrupt moron can now play around with open source software instead of eating something fills me with only small amounts of hope.

just like you said earlier, I did get inspired more about AI. One thing it does is to ring disruption of the current labor force and creates more means of employment. So, as humans what we need to do is to become proactive and learn.

Trades - especially those that involve physically fixing or remodeling your home - are safe.

James Watson who received Nobel price for discovering structure of DNA once promoted moratorium on genetic engineering... that is until he became involved with his own biotech company. Billionaires are not immune to hypocrisy. Money seem to trump everything. By the way James Watson and his buddy Francis kinda "stole" data that lead them to their discover from Rosalind Franklin.

Thanks for sharing :)

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 *🤔 Big Tech claims AI is for the benefit of humanity, but there are concerns about their true motives.* 00:14 *💻 Tech companies are making AI accessible to non-coders through conversational interfaces.* 00:27 *😟 There is an uneasy feeling about how AI is impacting our lives and jobs.* 00:42 *🤐 Big Tech employees seem uncomfortable discussing AI's real-world impact.* 01:10 *🤥 The narrative of Big Tech building a technological utopia is a lie.* 01:25 *📈 AI allows companies to grow faster and build personalized experiences.* 02:07 *🧑‍💼 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has a background in venture capital.* 02:48 *🔬 OpenAI was initially a non-profit for AI safety research.* 03:29 *💰 OpenAI shifted focus to commercial products and generating financial returns.* 03:57 *💸 In Silicon Valley, success is based on investments rather than innovation.* 04:26 *🚀 Companies prioritize growth over safety to attract more investments.* 04:54 *🎭 OpenAI maintains a narrative of benefiting humanity while pursuing commercial interests.* 05:21 *🤖 Elon Musk slowed AI research to give himself time to develop his own AI.* 06:01 *🤑 The real motive is billionaires competing for an AI monopoly, not benefiting society.* 06:28 *🎥 Google's impressive AI demos may be deceptive.* 08:17 *👁️ Google's AI capabilities could be overstated or reliant on human reviewers.* 08:45 *🛒 Amazon's cashier-less stores relied heavily on human labor.* 09:41 *💰 The "trickle-down economy" theory is flawed, and the wealthy rarely distribute their wealth.* 11:46 *👩‍💻 Many Big Tech employees are not bad people, but leadership's actions don't align with their stated goals.* 12:27 *🌐 The open-source movement offers transparency and community-driven development.* 13:23 *🤝 The open-source community is stepping up in the AI field with models and products.* 14:46 *🌱 Building AI businesses and startups using open-source tools is becoming easier.* 15:11 *👩‍⚖️ Policymakers are interested in regulating AI but need experts to guide them.* 16:07 *👥 There's a need for people interested in AI to spearhead innovation and policy development.* Made with HARPA AI

tbh, i feel life any jobs even judge and doctor can be replaced. because a profession consist of knowledge and skill which both of these can be replaced by ai and robotics. ai replace knowledge and analytical then robotics complemented by ai can replaced skill based jobs. it's just a matter of time at this point.

Remember, it's not a _lie_ if you _believe_ in it. 😜

Everyone start playing sports 😂

I am so glad to live in the times of rotting late stage capitalist dystopia where decades of attacks on our rights are finally culminating in more scams under the guise of improved living standards through technology. Government successfully provides welfare for the billion dollar corporations (ie covid), while endlessly debating whether educated college graduates deserve a fraction of their loans forgiven. I am in a tech field myself and I feel extremely uncomfortable with the future of working on something that will displace me and my friends in non-tech areas. At least if I felt that this got rid of menial labor, I would gladly work for it. Instead, we are all in the race to the bottom to please the few that will make the buck without any second thoughts about everything else. This is an ideal recipe for a blowback of systemic proportions.

Great job Tina.! Your friends on the channel are pulling for you. You’re Amazing!

I love this video but comparing UBI to trickle down economics is a bit weird and dismisses UBI's actual benefit. Trickle down economics was a scam created by a ghoul while UBI is a scientifically tested social program that needs to be implemented as the question of human labor capital comes into question. with that being said, you are right. The wealthy aren't going to just give their money away out of the goodness of their hearts. There is more that needs to be done to ensure a safety net after the upcoming shift. I also love that you mentioned open source and how open source AI is the Move too!

Recruiting will be around for a while. Companies already use ATS systems but recruiters still manage to get in and place people.

AI IS GOING TO FIX THE ECOMONY!

10:50 - Ya like how Bill Gates is one of the top donors to the WHO. I'm sure all of their research and decisions will be made for the benefit of us regular people though, not whatever Bill Gates is invested in.

man im glad i didnt burn out like you

Thanks for your analysis 👍 100 % agree with u

9:42 Universal Basic Income is a bad idea because it disincentivises work and devalues currency. A Negative Income Tax maintains work incentives better than guaranteed income programs, which have a 100% marginal tax rate, reducing subsidies by $1 for every $1 earned - especially because it wouldn't require the rich to pay more taxes. I recommend reading Milton Friedman's "Capitalism and Freedom" where he explains the five benefits of the negative income tax: 1. A negative income tax provides cash directly to individuals. 2. Targets poverty through income. 3. Can replace all existing support programs with a universal one. 4. Potentially costs less due to lower administrative expenses. 5. Avoids market distortions unlike minimum wage laws or tariffs. If the break-even income were $3000. For a family of four with $4000 income, they'd pay tax on $1000. A family with $2000 income would receive $500, as the negative income tax (NIT) rate is 50%. A family with no income would get a $1500 subsidy.

Lol. It sucks to be Gen-Z, if only I was born 30 years ago, I wouldn't have had to worry about this!

I created an assistant model back in August 2023 that I use most days.

Open AI is at it again ! Tina, it’s so cute to see you frazzled, see you in the raw unlike your previous polished self. It’s actually endearing, be yourself. Keep up the great work of helping us keep abreast with AI 👍👍👍

Tina, I love your honesty and openness. My view is the same as yours, watching your live stream was like having a good chat with a friend. ❤

It's time to repeal Reaganomics.

Yes, Every time a new general-purpose-technology is introduced, new jobs are created. But the height of hurdles for those jobs also increased. How many people do you think will be able to understand AI enough to get a job in this field? Not very many. Heck, even those new jobs will be automated very soon after they are introduced, and it is a vicious cycle. And as AI gets smarter and more capable each time, the cycle become shorter each time. To the point where it beyond our own level of intelligence.

New tech creates new jobs by making things cheaper so consumers purchase more of it. For example, in 1850 we moved dirt with shovels and wheelbarrows. One man with a backhoe can do the work of a few teams of men with shovels. But we move so much more dirt today. The amount of earth that's moved for roads, backyard pools, driveways, parking lots, etc. would never have been attempted in 1850. In 1996, an online photo album had to be created by someone with coding skills. Today, preteens easily make one in a few minutes with a phone and social media apps. The process is largely automated. The person who wrote the code in 1996 is no longer needed. But that doesn't mean that nobody writes code today. In 1996, almost no one had an online photo album. Today, it's hard to find people who don't. The government even uses our online photo albums to keep tabs on us. In other words, the product got way cheaper and customers bought way way more of it.

Thank you so much for your thorough analysis.

even if AI was good, its controlled by capitalists, who only want to exploit you

If the companies are working hard at eliminating the workers, then whose supposed to buy their products 😂😂and exactly with what income , seems they are eliminating their products in a full circle moment. Maybe the Star Trek universe will come true after all

YAY 🫠 Same Tina, same.

Techbros are all scammers

AI can do any job. The difference is: Employers can decide to keep their money and do the manager job themselfes, employees can't.

We are LEAGUES away from AGI and they've always known this. When ever a so called "earth shattering" developement comes, theres a quiet part of my mind that feels like they just gave us more baby food and called it solids .

This video came so close to getting it. None of the discussion of "open AI" pointed out how any of the open models were actually doing good things - just "cool" things. It's good because it's open? I mean, that's better than closed, but but this is still boosterism for technology that we mostly do not need and will mostly harm us in the hands of capitalists. (There are legitimately good uses for LLM tech, but most of them are very nerdy.)

"How To Not Get Replaced By AI" and then you sponsor an AI product that replaces Web Developers!? Are you fucking kidding me?!

Wow I 😮

so she actually describes me within seconds🥲

Intriguing

Her oily skin looks healthy??

Tina, forgive my harsh criticism in this comment but don't act like your actions and those of many others tech content creators like you are not part of the problem. Since GPT became popular you guys are constantly publishing video about how to jump on the AI train and that us devs should take any job opportunity in this field to not fall behind, not taking in consideration that any progress in AI is making a person like me and you jobless with heavy difficulties on re-entering the job market. Only now you came up with a critique that maybe maybe we shouldn't continue to look to this bane (because this is in fact, to the wast majority of tech careers) with a naive heart and follow every stupid bs Musk, Altman, Bezos, Zuckerberg and few others are telling us to refrein us from stopping them, only to throw everything out of the window with a questionable sponsor. I mean, what game are you trying to play here? Yes, can't deny that your advice to contribute into open source AI project can be a valid alternative to move the monopoly away from those f*kers I mentioned above but these AI projects needs training that is coming from work stolen from professionals anyway. There NO WAY you can put this AI thing to be ethical, in ANY case. You said it well that those guys are not having our interests at heart and that's why I think that this technology should be just shut down without a second guess and that you guys who have a huge platform and influence to speak must take a stance soon or later, if you have any sense of ethics and personal principles. We are talking of people lives, not stupid React pet project to put on a portfolio to show off that we can code, for fuck sake

big tech AI is such a circlederp

How do i get to talk to the chick version on my android I have the subscription, where do i find the model that i can talk to?

Not yours. Lol

Everyone just stop having kids, you see how quickly their change their tune..🤣

Can you chill out with the AI content?

There's only one job safe from AI, that of a psychic, if you can call that a job. Prove me wrong.

Yes yes and yes. Subbed :)

Tina, you have a nice voice. New in the channel

The "01 light" website is selling "preorders" for $109. Doesn't Open Source also mean free ?

Most of my conversations with Bard (excuse me, "Gemini") for the last week have amounted to me asking it a question about a fact, and it telling me that I need to look it up on my own. That's following months of me telling it when it has made factually erroneous statements or given bad advice. AI has been a scam for sixty or seventy years. No surprise that it's still a scam. No, machines cannot "think like a human." They aren't, and cannot ever be, even close. Part of the reason is that human thought is a consequence of the way human brains are constructed. That's why we have emotions, but machines do not. That's why we have thought and consciousness, but machines do not. AI is, at best, just an uncomprehending parrot. It would have been nice if it could at least look up factual information when I need it.