Пікірлер
@sabyasachiroy2367 Күн бұрын
Islam & madarsas are so consistent...... I mean consistent in producing donkey's
@mandeepsekhon 4 күн бұрын
It was religious.. they wanted them to convert to Islam . So don’t try to justify it with politics as an excuse!!!
@SufiyanMullaji-uc3xv 4 күн бұрын
Really is it too hard for people to understand dialects dialect noun plural noun: dialects a particular form of a language which is peculiar to a specific region or social group. "the Lancashire dialect seemed like a foreign language" Similar: regional language local language local tongue local speech local parlance 160 English dialects There are approximately 160 English dialects in the world, broken down into several major families. British English includes the dialects spoken in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. American English includes all of the United States' dialects, from Southern to Californian (and, sometimes, Canadian). Likewise Arabic language has manh dialects too But the Holy Quran was revealed in 7 different dialects All means same It is said that these 7 dialects (ahruf) belong to the following seven tribes: Quraysh, Hudhayl, Thaqeef, Hawaazin, Kinaanah, Tameem and a tribe of Yemen. The wisdom behind this was that the Quran in seven different dialects made its recitation and memorization much easier for the local tribe's
@emranhossain7381 4 күн бұрын
The book of Harry potter by j.k rolling has two versions One for British audiences and one for USA audiences. Like the word 🧥 jumper is used for England and sweater is used by American That's the same case here
@DAWAHTALK-Media 4 күн бұрын
@@emranhossain7381 thanks for a rational analysis to explain to some of the questioners Plus the bottom line about scriptures is the Source. Who gave both (or say 10 recitals), these variant recitals ? The author himself/herself , as long as it’s authorised by the main author, then no one shud have any issue with that The question Muslims raise against Bible is, the several versions aren’t authorised nor written by the author of the Bible/gospel
@the80s61 5 күн бұрын
Mr waseem your awesome thr new gen of lion of dawah,may Allah protrct you in your way of dawah
@DAWAHTALK-Media 5 күн бұрын
@@the80s61 Ameen Jazakallah khair for your Duas May Allah bless you and your family
@the80s61 6 күн бұрын
Christian is blind believe, with this so much contradiction and unknown author/writer, add and throw verse.no way the bible from God.even if it contains the word of God it cant be guidance cz God dont make mistake. Just a simple logic
@peace.n.blessings5579 7 күн бұрын
This is so interesting, the Bible was formed 400 years after Jesus. He spoke Aramaic and his name was ISA. Jusus is Greek word. You follow the teachings of Paul who never met Jusus. Even your own Christian scholars state the Bible had many authors who were anonymous. No wonder so many Christians are finding Islam.
@thesocialapologist 5 күн бұрын
Actually you are wrong. The New Testament was written over the course of the first century CE, not 400 years after Jesus. The earliest texts, Paul's epistles, were written around 50-60 CE, and the Gospels were written between 70-100 CE. Jesus (Yeshua in Aramaic, which is the equivalent of Joshua in Hebrew) is indeed a Semitic name. The name "Jesus" is derived from the Greek "Iesous," which was the common way to refer to him in the Hellenistic world. The use of different names in different languages does not change the identity or teachings of Jesus. Jesus did not only speak Aramaic. It was the common tongue at the time, yet Hebrew was the language of the Jewish scriptures (the Old Testament). Jesus, being a Jew and a rabbi (teacher), would have been familiar with Hebrew for reading and teaching the scriptures. Jesus also spoke Greek. One thing you are forgetting, are the 16 Surrah's that affirm the Injeel and the Torah that Muhammad hat during his time. Manuscript evidence demonstrates they are the same ones we still have (Dead Sea Scrolls, Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus...). So you have a conundrum on your hands. Your book affirms my book, while mine denies yours. You have to prove how the Injeel and Torah have been tampered with, because manuscript evidence is standing in your way...
@thesocialapologist 7 күн бұрын
List of contradictions: Q3:146 “Hafs” version says “And many a prophet FOUGHT alongside large bands of men…” “alBazzi” version says “And many a Prophet WAS KILLED alongside large bands of men…” So which is it? Because it is clearly different. Did the prophets fight alongside (active verb) or get killed (passive verb) Q2:140 “Hafs” version says “Or do YOU say that Abraham and Isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” “Warsh” version says “Or do THEY say that Abraham and isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” Is it directly addressed to YOU, or indirectly to THEY? This changes the meaning due to whom is being spoken at. Q2:271 “Hafs” version says “And it is better for you, and HE will expiate from you some of your sins…” “alSusi” version says “And it is better for you, and WE will expiate from you some of your sins…” Is it WE (the person speaking here) or HE (someone other than the person speaking) that will expiate some of your sins? Q10:2 Warsh: "Rajulun" (A man) Ibn Kathir: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. Q12:80 Hafs: "Falamma istayasu minhu" (When they despaired of him) Hamzah: "Falamma istayasu bihi" (When they despaired with him) Difference: "Minhu" (of him) vs. "Bihi" (with him). Q10:2 Khalaf: "Rajulun" (A man) Al-Layth: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. Let's start with the first one. Did prophets fight alongside, or were they killed? Because in the context of reading that they fought (without it mentioning they perished) is very different from a statement being made that the prophets were killed among large bands of men. Even the second one is a contradiction, because if it is you, then it cannot be they/them, and vice versa. Even regarding the Qur'an, how can you definitively claim 114 Surah's, when you have: Ubai Ibn Ka’b has 116 surah’s Ibn Mas’ud has 110 surah’s Ibn Musa has 114 surah’s Zaid Ibn Thabit’s Qur’an, which is the one used for the standardized Qur’an, has over 15,000 differences from the other three Qur’ans listed here above, as found by Arthur Jeffrey. According to Smith (Fadi and Smith 2021b) there are 5000 differences between the Hafs and the Warsh The six earliest Qur’anic manuscripts, TOPKAPI, SAMMARQAND, MA’IL, HOUSEINI, PETROPOLITANUS and SANA’A are not of the Mushafs that Uthmān had sent to the various centers” (Altıkulaç 2007). When looking at these 30 Qira'ats, these transmitters contain 93,263 differences from the readers, according to Al Fadi & Smith (2021). References: Altıkulaç, Tayyar. 2007. Al-Mushaf Al-Sharif Attributed to Uthman Bin Affan (The Copy at Topkapı Palace Museum in Istanbul). 1st ed. Istanbul: IRCICA.
@artoriasabysswalker5133 6 күн бұрын
weak, its like tomayto, tomahto, its not contradiction, it like saying UK english vs US english vs Ausi english full of contradiction, learn again
@thesocialapologist 6 күн бұрын
@@artoriasabysswalker5133 So “fought” and “was killed” is the same? LoL! How is that the same? Learn again
@artoriasabysswalker5133 5 күн бұрын
@@thesocialapologist one word can have multiple meaning, whats wrong with that? you know word "hit"? does it only have one and only meaning? hit man, hit a girl, hit a man, seriously you dont know that? seriously you tell me to learn again? as long as i am living, i'll never stop learning, unlike you, when people talk bad about islam, you just accept it as fact, no question. you just stop learning dont you, and miss all the fact, its fun get deceived by people isnt it
@thesocialapologist 5 күн бұрын
@@artoriasabysswalker5133 "One word can have multiple meanings...." Do you see in my examples one word being used with multiple meanings? Or do you see completely different words, and in some cases, spoken from a different person all together? You speak and speak about something that has nothing to do with a single example I gave you... Is it "fought" and "fought"? Or is it "fought" and "was killed"? You see how your example has no weight to it? Address these examples I provided, don't run to other examples, address them, they are right here in front of your eyes. Explain how Allah is believed to perfectly preserve the Qur'an, yet I can show how it has not been?
@artoriasabysswalker5133 5 күн бұрын
@@thesocialapologist you know the original letter? the original languange? i dont think so, you failed in arabic so bad, please stop embarass yourself
@thesocialapologist 8 күн бұрын
I wish he brought up the contradictions between the Qira’ats to demonstrate they are not simply ways to recite, but that they actually contradict one another. Also, it would have been great to see this guy explain which seven in particular.
@DAWAHTALK-Media 8 күн бұрын
@@thesocialapologist all the qira’ats come from Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) directly as he recited whatever was revealed to him. However main point is none of those qira’ats have different number of chapters or verses of the Quran, all qira’ats have 114 chapter structure of the Quran, which proves Quran is only 1. As for recital differences, as explained in the video, whether it’s a letter that’s replaced or a word or format of the statement (direct or indirect quote), it does not change the Quran. These are recitals based on different tribes of Arabia who has different ways of saying the same thing. Whether you say: ‘God is Only One’ or you say, ‘the God I believe in is only 1’, it does not change nothing from the statement. There is no contradiction between the Qira’ats - that’s a very feeble claim :) Better try next time
@thesocialapologist 7 күн бұрын
@@DAWAHTALK-Media Oh, then I am sure you have the answers to the following contradictions then to explain how they don't contradict (Even though a contradiction stipulates both things cannot be true about a particular topic or thing) List of contradictions: Q3:146 “Hafs” version says “And many a prophet FOUGHT alongside large bands of men…” “alBazzi” version says “And may a Prophet WAS KILLED alongside large bands of men…” So which is it? Because it is clearly different. Did the prophets fight alongside (active verb) or get killed (passive verb) Q2:140 “Hafs” version says “Or do YOU say that Abraham and Isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” “Warsh” version says “Or do THEY say that Abraham and isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” Is it directly addressed to YOU, or indirectly to THEY? This changes the meaning due to whom is being spoken at. Q2:271 “Hafs” version says “And it is better for you, and HE will expiate from you some of your sins…” “alSusi” version says “And it is better for you, and WE will expiate from you some of your sins…” Is it WE (the person speaking here) or HE (someone other than the person speaking) that will expiate some of your sins? Q10:2 Warsh: "Rajulun" (A man) Ibn Kathir: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. Q12:80 Hafs: "Falamma istayasu minhu" (When they despaired of him) Hamzah: "Falamma istayasu bihi" (When they despaired with him) Difference: "Minhu" (of him) vs. "Bihi" (with him). Q10:2 Khalaf: "Rajulun" (A man) Al-Layth: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. Let's start with the first one. Did prophets fight alongside, or were they killed? Because in the context of reading that they fought (without it mentioning they perished) is very different from a statement being made that the prophets were killed among large bands of men. Even the second one is a contradiction, because if it is you, then it cannot be they/them, and vice versa. Even regarding the Qur'an, how can you definitively claim 114 Surah's, when you have: Ubai Ibn Ka’b has 116 surah’s Ibn Mas’ud has 110 surah’s Ibn Musa has 114 surah’s Zaid Ibn Thabit’s Qur’an, which is the one used for the standardized Qur’an, has over 15,000 differences from the other three Qur’ans listed here above, as found by Arthur Jeffrey. According to Smith (Fadi and Smith 2021b) there are 5000 differences between the Hafs and the Warsh The six earliest Qur’anic manuscripts, TOPKAPI, SAMMARQAND, MA’IL, HOUSEINI, PETROPOLITANUS and SANA’A are not of the Mushafs that Uthmān had sent to the various centers” (Altıkulaç 2007). When looking at these 30 Qira'ats, these transmitters contain 93,263 differences from the readers, according to Al Fadi & Smith (2021). References: Altıkulaç, Tayyar. 2007. Al-Mushaf Al-Sharif Attributed to Uthman Bin Affan (The Copy at Topkapı Palace Museum in Istanbul). 1st ed. Istanbul: IRCICA.
@shuaibsiddiqui3427 9 күн бұрын
Mathew ch 5 verse 17 Clearly state jesus is a prophet I.e series of prophethood is continue
@singh88920 9 күн бұрын
Video sikho ke bare mein hai lekin yaha comment sare hindu bhai kar rahe hain bhai itna nakk nahi ghusate dusro ke mamale mein aur sab galat history bata rahe jo ki sahi nahi hai yaha toh kuch hindu definition de rahe sikh ki batao koi gair sikh kese sikho ko define kar sakta hai aur inko abc bhi nahi pata sikh dharam ki woh bata rahe hain
@user-rf5jg1vg1c 9 күн бұрын
The question of Jesus claiming to be god is irrelavent to a christian. Jesus is the son of god and one with the Father and the sacrificial lamb of god which replaced further blood sacrifices forever of animals forever
@DAWAHTALK-Media 9 күн бұрын
@@user-rf5jg1vg1c biblically many prophets are son of God, even non-prophets are children of God, so it’s more of a metaphor than anything literal Hence being referred as ‘son of God’ doesn’t mean much as such As for sacrificial lamb, this concept wasn’t believed by any previous prophet & hence moving forward it can’t be a belief matter as such. Just becz someone believes Jesus was saved by God and didn’t die, it neither counts as disbelief nor a sin - henceforth again, this doesn’t hold much as such
@user-rf5jg1vg1c 9 күн бұрын
@@DAWAHTALK-Media can u do somthing good. Stop ur guy zakir.utman. mansur. Evils in the world in ur allahs name. In name of dawah creating arguement and debate over jesus. U islamic freaks see what in ur islam before attacking the other beliefs. Kissing the stones out of the latrine and circling the black box is idolatry for me. Which u r covering up. But dont spare other beliefs. That's allah evil
@shuaibsiddiqui3427 10 күн бұрын
Same in mathew ch 24 verse 36
@ishwarbhola 10 күн бұрын
Memorized or not, dies that make it true, its still a false dirty book, copy and paste , also a very poor copy and paste book.
@BeOfBenefit 11 күн бұрын
I am a sikh convert to islam. I love the pure monotheism of Islam and how the same message is confirmed from previous scriptures of Judaism, while addressing the falsehood that crept in. All of my questions were answered by Islam. We would never physically prostrate to the Quran or the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), only to God. I feel sad for my Sikh brothers and sisters who were given a false impression of Islam. I invite you to please explore Islam with an open heart, or to even ask God with a sincere heart to show you the truth about Islam. May God bless you❤
@herrybhanot4459 12 күн бұрын
Moh.md was r@pist, war monger
@sanrif9735 13 күн бұрын
every quran start with al fatihah, ended with surah an-nas.. while catholic bible has more book than protestant bible
@DAWAHTALK-Media 13 күн бұрын
@@sanrif9735 yes, that’s a good way to put it
@thesocialapologist 5 күн бұрын
What about in these circumstances? Ubai Ibn Ka’b has 116 surah’s Ibn Mas’ud has 110 surah’s Ibn Musa has 114 surah’s
@DAWAHTALK-Media 5 күн бұрын
@@thesocialapologist 1) None of these are considered Qurans except the one with 114 chapters. 2) there is no Muslim ever who memorised 110 or 116 Surah quran:), hence it does not hold any significance at all 3) It was an individual’s thought during a lengthy discussion that he assumed 2 chapters weren’t part of the Quran while another one thought there’s two more Duas (prayers) which maybe part of the Quran. But on further evidence and witness from all the memorisers of the Quran at the time of the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh), it was unanimously agreed that they heard 114 chapter/Surah from the Prophet. Hence that’s the only quran in the world
@thesocialapologist 5 күн бұрын
@@DAWAHTALK-Media These clearly memorized this count, hence why we know about them. Secondly, you are referring to the Hafs version that was canonized in 1924… You dont have an “original”, you only have the created one (hadith).
@usmansiddiqui9475 15 күн бұрын
How can people believe in such ridiculous and laughable stories?
@ibrahimadamu4112 15 күн бұрын
Thanks you Sheikh
@Shaikhnuman 15 күн бұрын
Alhamdulilllah.......another Zakir Nayek is born.
@mqb5151 16 күн бұрын
I love how the Christan was giving lectures and preaching in the QnA to stop him answering too many questions.
@mqb5151 16 күн бұрын
Ma'sha'Allah a new force in the world.
@rbsinghgaming2695 16 күн бұрын
Wrong i know u r against sikhs being opressed by mughals but sikhs didnt try to get any land or create empire they save dpeople from opression that why its not just popitical mughal kings were opressors neither were religious aurangzebs ruling strategy was not right and in 1984 also its wasnt just political they wanted to opress sikhs and in sikh empire it didnt fall due rebellion it fell cause king died and after that british rushed to take control which was possible due to traitors any kashmiri wasnt opressed and if some were then opressors were punished and no more opression was there but i belive u say it right that killing an innocent shouldnt be compared with religion
@tanzeelurrehman1985 17 күн бұрын
اِنَّ🇵🇸الْبَاطِلَ🇵🇸كَانَ🇵🇸زَهُوْقًا
@lalmia4288 17 күн бұрын
>>Jew / Muslim : We are mocking Christians' Extra Biblical Trinitarian Pagan Concept of God which Christianity borrowed from Greek Mythology (Philosophy) and Roman Pagan Faith.. -->Scholar Adammax maxon: Christianity belief that God sacrificed God to God to save God’s creation from God.... X-Files >Note: Hindus feed their God while Christians feast their God's flesh & blood, lol =>What Human or Divine logic are you using being a Christian?? >>To understand the Trinity & Salvation in Christian Theology it must require a sacrifice of your brain-cells!! >>Muslim Q to Christian: Can God do anything ? >Christian Ans: Of course ! >Muslim Q: Can God forgive Sin without Shedding Innocent Blood Of God the Son, Jesus? Christian Ans: Of course not ! -->Christian Theology all about: Though Biblical God's One of the 10 Commandments is: "Thou should not Kill" But Christianity Believes: Sinner Humans through the Killing of God the Son, Jesus (by the very Sinner Humans) only achieved Forgiveness / Salvation!! >>Q: Can GOD be killed by Humans (Pagan Romans)?? -->Note: Is it Justice: The Most Innocent Person (Jesus, 2nd person of Triune God) was Killed / Crucified & Burned in the Hell to Forgive the Sinners. =>NOTE: WHO do Christians REALLY Follow? >> It's not truly Jesus but actually PAUL & CHURCH >>Church refers to: . .ALL OUR RIGHTEOUS ACTS ARE LIKE FILTHY RAGS BEFORE GOD. ISAIAH 64 : 6 >>But Jesus said: (which Modern-day Christianity does not follow) >Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven. (Mathew 5 17+18) >>Q: OHH No: HOW PAUL'S OPINION IS THE GOD'S FINAL OPINION ABOUT FAITH & SALVATION? -->Paul mentioned what Christian indoctrinated as the main creed of "Salvation": At 1:13...Paul mentioned in his LETTERS: (Those have been INCLUDED in the BIBLE) >As per Paul: Deeds (following Mosaic Laws) are curse which no more requires but faith only.) >>But according to Bible : "Faith without deeds is dead". >As per Paul: "There is no Forgiveness without the shedding of "Blood" (Particularly Innocent Blood of Jesus). >>But in the BIBLE CLEARLY WE CAN SEE THE FOLLOWING OPPOSING QUOTES AGAINST THE REQUIRED "SACRIFICE" concept: 1 Samuel 15:22…And Samuel said, Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams. >>Psalm 40:6...Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required. >>Jonah Ch. 3…After Jonah goes to the King of NINEVAH…the King orders everyone to FAST and PRAY for FORGIVENESS and “GOD” FORGIVE THEM. No Animal Sacrifice needed. =>NOTE: Islamic Justice for Salvation nothing But exact same as it's been mentioned in Ezekiel 18 (para-phrasing}: "The Wickedest of the Waked if turn away from Sins and Repent and do what is lawful & righteous surely he won't die but live. His Sins will be forgiven (never be remembered) as if he never commit Sin." >>Q: Was Jesus Jew by Faith & following the Judaic Laws or, Christian?? >> If Jesus certainly was Jew then how Christians are Jesus Like (the meaning of the word 'Christian') by abandoning Judaic Laws as Paul mentioned as "Curse" which no more requires?? In Matthew 7:21 & 7:22 "Jesus" clearly said *Those who don't do the will of My Father will not enter the kingdom of heaven *. * On that day many will say to me, 'Lord , Lord , did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name , and do many mighty works in your name?' And then I will declare to them , 'I never knew you; depart from me, you evildoers *. -->Q: What's the "Will of My Father" as Jesus mentioned? Is it Violating the 1st & 2nd Commandment by Taking Jesus & Holy Spirit as God as well beside GOD The FATHER? the "ONLY TRUE God that is God the Father, One Person" according to Jesus quoted in the John 17:3 ?? =>KZfaq Vid-Clips to watch those are Truth seeking : (With the following Heading) Paul never met Jesus, yet he invented Christianity - Rabbi Tovia Singer Christianity Has It All Wrong About God and Jesus | Rabbi Tovia Singer Did Jesus Claim to be God? Rabbi Tovia Singer Explores the Gospels Rabbi Tovia Singer: This is why Christianity is Wrong! Sin and Atonement, Sacrifice and the Blood Rabbi Tovia Singer Explains the ‘Gospel Problem’ and Shows Why Later Christians Doctored the Gospels ->According to the Bible Jesus also clearly mentioned in the Gospel of John: Chapter-17: Verse:3 : ' This is life eternal they may know you, the Father, you are "The Only True God and who has sent me, Jesus..." which Islam agrees and re-affirms 100%. =>Q: How Jesus can be God when he has God (Jesus cried out to his God as, My God my God why though has Forsaken me) when there is "ONLY TRUE God is the Father" according to Jesus quoted in the John 17:3? =>Simple Reasons Why Jesus Is Not God even in the light of Gospels: 1- God is neither a Man nor a Son of a Man (Numbers 23:19) but Jesus is mentioned 68 times in the BIBLE as "Son of Man"? 2- Why though call me "Good" there none Good except Only the GOD in heaven is " Good" (Luke 18:19) > Jesus is not Good as the God is. 3- Jesus said he doesn't know when the Hour will come but Only GOD the Father Knows. (Mark 13:32) > The Only True GOD is the Only All-knowing. 4. Jesus also said "I am going to My GOD and your (believers') GOD" is the same God(John 20:17) > Jesus & we all have the Same GOD. 5- Jesus can do nothing by himself (John 5:19, John 5:30) Jesus was not seeking his will but the Will of his Father God. > Only God is the All-powerful. 6- GOD alone is "Immortal" (never ever Subject to Death) but Jesus Died / Killed by HUMANS (Roman Pagans). +>NOTE: Dear Christians: There would be three possibilities below Or that can be a fourth! possibility of your Trinity is :). 1- Your God is one God, one god/person/entity with a mask, he changes between 3 characters via a mask, but nonetheless, he is still a mere One Person/One God regardless of the mask. 2- Your God is a modular Lego, consists of 3 parts that NONE OF THESE PARTS IS A GOD ON ITS OWN, ONLY WHEN the 3 parts are joined together they form one God. 3- Your God consists of 3 Gods, each one of the 3 Gods is a God on his own. When the 3 Gods are joined together they form a different God Or Last Possibility: Polytheism! NOTE: Sadly, you cannot inherit Eternal Life from Paul & Church perspective but Jesus! =>When you're talking to Christian / Church: What human or Divine logic are you using?? Jesus: By myself I can do nothing! The Church: No! Jesus can do everything! Jesus: The only True God is The Father! (John 17:3) The Church: No! JESUS & HOLISPIRIT are also true god! Jesus: The Lord our God is ONE! (The most Important Commandment) The Church: No! The Lord our God is three in one! Jesus: If you (Believers) want eternal life then keep The Commandments! The Church: No! If you (Believers) want eternal life then believe that Jesus died for your sins! Jesus: I cried and prayed to God to save me from the crucifixion and God heard my prayers! The Church: No! God didn't save him so we can be saved by his blood! Jesus: My Father is greater than I, my Father is greater than all! The Church: No! The Father is not greater than you Jesus, you're both co-equal! Jesus: I was sent Only to the lost sheep of Israel, not to the gentiles! The Church: No! Jesus was sent to the entire world! Jesus : Circumcise male children as God Commanded! The Church: No! Circumcision is unnecessary and will profit us nothing >This is what Paul said! Jesus: I didn't come to abolish the Laws! The Church: No, Jesus came to abolish it all! The law brings wrath, and where there is no law, there is no transgression! This is what Paul said! Jesus: If you love me keep my commandments! The Church: No, don't listen to him(Jesus) Christians! If you love him then keep the Church Commandments built by Paul, the early Christian persecutor! Jesus: I never met Paul! The Church: No! You, Jesus came to Paul in a dream, can't you recall? >> Jesus: I never ate ham and so you should as God Commanded! The Church: No! Ham is good! >> Jesus: I've finished all the work that God gave me before my departure! The Church: No! Jesus waited till he ascend to heaven and came in a dream of Paul to negate everything he preached during his Ministry on this Earth! =>NOTE: Judaism rejected Jesus and Christianity but ISLAM established the Bridge among all the three Origins of Abrahamic Faiths by accepting Prophet Moses, Prophet Jesus And reaffirming> "The One & Only True God been described in the 1st & 2nd Commandments (Exodus 20:3 & 20:4) and in Chapter-17: Verse:3. =>>ISLAM related: -->KZfaq Vid-Clips (with the Titles/Headings as follows) 10 Biggest Reasons Muslims Say ISLAM Is True Who is Allah - Mind Blowing! The Throne of Allah - Mind blowing Top 5 Reasons People Convert to ISLAM | Australian Reaction The Meaning of Life | Muslim Revert Talk ISLAM Russian Jewish Rabbi Accepts ISLAM after Intensive Research Amazing Miracles Of Prophet Muhammad: #10 Will Shock You Prophet Muhammad -The greatest man in history Karen Armstrong : Islam is the Greatest Religion in the World
@iy-239 17 күн бұрын
Education opportunity should make every learned person more happy to share.
@Shaikhnuman 17 күн бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@mujeebhamid2670 17 күн бұрын
Imagine how much man has to fall to tell with surety what God means by ayam. Yes it could mean anything, but most ulema of past are of the aqeedah that, Allah meant 6 days from it. And yes Allah did create universe in 6 days. Yes the question might arise, which days are these, earthly or heavenly. Plus are earthly days shorter or longer than heavenly days. But the one who denies Allah didn't create universe in 6 days goes against all of the ulemas of our past.
@DAWAHTALK-Media 17 күн бұрын
@@mujeebhamid2670 fair point However, no one in the discussion has denied that Allah created universe in 6 days! Except only tried to explain what 6 days/periods could mean (other than 6 worldly days of 24 hr durations) based on usage of the word ‘Ayyaam’ in other verses of the Quran
@mujeebhamid2670 17 күн бұрын
Problem then arises why the 6 days of Bible are told to be unscientific. The thing is both Qur'an and Bible description of creation is unscientific. Oh wait ? Does that mean both of these books are false. Answer is No a big big No. The scientific view of creation is just a theory, it has some true elements but it is also intermixed with so many false theories. Even the most accepted view, big bang, is pounded these days by scientists and they seek a new theory of creation. Science will keep on changing, bcz it will never reach the truth, until it takes its source straightly from the creator. Science having a changing nature and so many theories turning out to be false, shouldn't give licence to religious critics to judge Qur'an or for that matter Bible with regards to science. Qur'an is ultimate truth. It is better than Bible and Bible is better than science. Science shouldn't be made authority to judge the religious books. Religious books are written in a language of soul. Whereas science is based on most plausible imaginations, where some imaginations turn out to be true whereas as most theories and imaginations are rejected ultimately.
@lalmia4288 18 күн бұрын
>>Jew / Muslim : We are mocking Christians' Extra Biblical Trinitarian Pagan Concept of God which Christianity borrowed from Greek Mythology (Philosophy) and Roman Pagan Faith.. -->Scholar Adammax maxon: Christianity belief that God sacrificed God to God to save God’s creation from God.... X-Files >Note: Hindus feed their God while Christians feast their God's flesh & blood, lol =>What Human or Devine logic are you using being a Christian?? >>To understand the Trinity & Salvation in Christian Theology it must require a sacrifice of your brain-cells!! >>Muslim Q to Christian: Can God do anything ? >Christian Ans: Of course ! >Muslim Q: Can God forgive Sin without Shedding Innocent Blood Of God the Son, Jesus? Christian Ans: Of course not ! -->Christian Theology all about: Though Biblical God's One of the 10 Commandments is: "Thou should not Kill" But Christianity Believes: Sinner Humans through the Killing of God the Son, Jesus (by the very Sinner Humans) only achieved Forgiveness / Salvation!! >>Q: Can GOD be killed by Humans?? -->Note: Is it Justice: The Most Innocent Person (Jesus, 2nd person of Triune God) was Killed / Crucified & Burned in the Hell to Forgive the Sinners. =>NOTE: WHO do Christians REALLY Follow? >> It's not truly Jesus but actually PAUL & CHURCH >>Church refers to: . .ALL OUR RIGHTEOUS ACTS ARE LIKE FILTHY RAGS BEFORE GOD. ISAIAH 64 : 6 >>But Jesus said: (which Modern-day Christianity does not follow) >Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven. (Mathew 5 17+18) >>Q: OHH No: HOW PAUL'S OPINION IS THE GOD'S FINAL OPINION ABOUT FAITH & SALVATION? -->Paul mentioned what Christian indoctrinated as the main creed of "Salvation": At 1:13...Paul mentioned in his LETTERS: (Those have been INCLUDED in the BIBLE) >As per Paul: Deeds (following Mosaic Laws) are curse which no more requires but faith only.) >>But according to Bible : "Faith without deeds is dead". >As per Paul: "There is no Forgiveness without the shedding of "Blood" (Particularly Innocent Blood of Jesus). >>But in the BIBLE CLEARLY WE CAN SEE THE FOLLOWING OPPOSING QUOTES AGAINST THE REQUIRED "SACRIFICE" concept: 1 Samuel 15:22…And Samuel said, Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams. >>Psalm 40:6...Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required. >>Jonah Ch. 3…After Jonah goes to the King of NINEVAH…the King orders everyone to FAST and PRAY for FORGIVENESS and “GOD” FORGIVE THEM. No Animal Sacrifice needed. =>NOTE: Islamic Justice for Salvation nothing But exact same as it's been mentioned in Ezekiel 18 (para-phrasing}: "The Wickedest of the Waked if turn away from Sins and Repent and do what is lawful & righteous surely he won't die but live. His Sins will be forgiven (never be remembered) as if he never commit Sin." >>Q: Was Jesus Jew by Faith & following the Judaic Laws or, Christian?? >> If Jesus certainly was Jew then how Christians are Jesus Like (the meaning of the word 'Christian') by abandoning Judaic Laws as Paul mentioned as "Curse" which no more requires?? In Matthew 7:21 & 7:22 "Jesus" clearly said *Those who don't do the will of My Father will not enter the kingdom of heaven *. * On that day many will say to me, 'Lord , Lord , did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name , and do many mighty works in your name?' And then I will declare to them , 'I never knew you; depart from me, you evildoers *. -->Q: What's the "Will of My Father" as Jesus mentioned? Is it Violating the 1st & 2nd Commandment by Taking Jesus & Holy Spirit as God as well beside GOD The FATHER? the "ONLY TRUE God that is God the Father, One Person" according to Jesus quoted in the John 17:3 ?? =>KZfaq Vid-Clips to watch those are Truth seeking : (With the following Heading) Paul never met Jesus, yet he invented Christianity - Rabbi Tovia Singer Christianity Has It All Wrong About God and Jesus | Rabbi Tovia Singer Did Jesus Claim to be God? Rabbi Tovia Singer Explores the Gospels Rabbi Tovia Singer: This is why Christianity is Wrong! Sin and Atonement, Sacrifice and the Blood Rabbi Tovia Singer Explains the ‘Gospel Problem’ and Shows Why Later Christians Doctored the Gospels ->According to the Bible Jesus also clearly mentioned in the Gospel of John: Chapter-17: Verse:3 : ' This is life eternal they may know you, the Father, you are "The Only True God and who has sent me, Jesus..." which Islam agrees and re-affirms 100%. =>Q: How Jesus can be God when he has God (Jesus cried out to his God as, My God my God why though has Forsaken me) when there is "ONLY TRUE God is the Father" according to Jesus quoted in the John 17:3? =>Simple Reasons Why Jesus Is Not God even in the light of Gospels: 1- God is neither a Man nor a Son of a Man (Numbers 23:19) but Jesus is mentioned 68 times in the BIBLE as "Son of Man"? 2- Why though call me "Good" there none Good except Only the GOD in heaven is " Good" (Luke 18:19) > Jesus is not Good as the God is. 3- Jesus said he doesn't know when the Hour will come but Only GOD the Father Knows. (Mark 13:32) > The Only True GOD is the Only All-knowing. 4. Jesus also said "I am going to My GOD and your (believers') GOD" is the same God(John 20:17) > Jesus & we all have the Same GOD. 5- Jesus can do nothing by himself (John 5:19, John 5:30) Jesus was not seeking his will but the Will of his Father God. > Only God is the All-powerful. 6- GOD alone is "Immortal" (never ever Subject to Death) but Jesus Died / Killed by HUMANS (Roman Pagans). +>NOTE: Dear Christians: There would be three possibilities below Or that can be a fourth! possibility of your Trinity is :). 1- Your God is one God, one god/person/entity with a mask, he changes between 3 characters via a mask, but nonetheless, he is still a mere One Person/One God regardless of the mask. 2- Your God is a modular Lego, consists of 3 parts that NONE OF THESE PARTS IS A GOD ON ITS OWN, ONLY WHEN the 3 parts are joined together they form one God. 3- Your God consists of 3 Gods, each one of the 3 Gods is a God on his own. When the 3 Gods are joined together they form a different God Or Last Possibility: Polytheism! NOTE: Sadly, you cannot inherit Eternal Life from Paul & Church perspective but Jesus! =>When you're talking to Christian / Church: What human or Divine logic are you using?? Jesus: By myself I can do nothing! The Church: No! Jesus can do everything! Jesus: The only True God is The Father! (John 17:3) The Church: No! JESUS & HOLISPIRIT are also true god! Jesus: The Lord our God is ONE! (The most Important Commandment) The Church: No! The Lord our God is three in one! Jesus: If you (Believers) want eternal life then keep The Commandments! The Church: No! If you (Believers) want eternal life then believe that Jesus died for your sins! Jesus: I cried and prayed to God to save me from the crucifixion and God heard my prayers! The Church: No! God didn't save him so we can be saved by his blood! Jesus: My Father is greater than I, my Father is greater than all! The Church: No! The Father is not greater than you Jesus, you're both co-equal! Jesus: I was sent Only to the lost sheep of Israel, not to the gentiles! The Church: No! Jesus was sent to the entire world! Jesus : Circumcise male children as God Commanded! The Church: No! Circumcision is unnecessary and will profit us nothing >This is what Paul said! Jesus: I didn't come to abolish the Laws! The Church: No, Jesus came to abolish it all! The law brings wrath, and where there is no law, there is no transgression! This is what Paul said! Jesus: If you love me keep my commandments! The Church: No, don't listen to him(Jesus) Christians! If you love him then keep the Church Commandments built by Paul, the early Christian persecutor! Jesus: I never met Paul! The Church: No! You, Jesus came to Paul in a dream, can't you recall? >> Jesus: I never ate ham and so you should as God Commanded! The Church: No! Ham is good! >> Jesus: I've finished all the work that God gave me before my departure! The Church: No! Jesus waited till he ascend to heaven and came in a dream of Paul to negate everything he preached during his Ministry on this Earth! =>NOTE: Judaism rejected Jesus and Christianity but ISLAM established the Bridge among all the three Origins of Abrahamic Faiths by accepting Prophet Moses, Prophet Jesus And reaffirming> "The One & Only True God been described in the 1st & 2nd Commandments (Exodus 20:3 & 20:4) and in Chapter-17: Verse:3. =>>ISLAM related: -->KZfaq Vid-Clips (with the Titles/Headings as follows) 10 Biggest Reasons Muslims Say ISLAM Is True Who is Allah - Mind Blowing! The Throne of Allah - Mind blowing Top 5 Reasons People Convert to ISLAM | Australian Reaction The Meaning of Life | Muslim Revert Talk ISLAM Russian Jewish Rabbi Accepts ISLAM after Intensive Research Amazing Miracles Of Prophet Muhammad: #10 Will Shock You Prophet Muhammad -The greatest man in history Karen Armstrong : Islam is the Greatest Religion in the World
@southwestvillas5469 18 күн бұрын
24-Hour in a day is only here on Earth. So in Arabic the word ayaam which is a period of time. If you ever watched outer space movie like Star Trek when they bring up time such as hours or minutes. They always say in your Earth hours or Earth minutes .This is because God is not here on Earth. He's not part of his creation.
@AkashSingh-n7l 18 күн бұрын
😂😂 without lie Islam die
@izni-J 18 күн бұрын
Ah the day question, just because it says "day" it does not automatically refer to earth days of 24 hours, the earth was still nonexistent when universe was being created, so why would the creator reference it? People really ask dumb questions. Time is relative to the reference body, the reference body for universe could be something outside of it which has its own time period. And this 6 days could be relative to that or something else, neither quran nor bible have ever reference what it is taking as a time factor reference when it says 6 days.
@vvaloachi7263 18 күн бұрын
Amazing Universal facts of the Quran - ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. We got this Book from a Man who was completely unlettered - Did not know any Letter, which means he could not read anything or write anything. 2. The Book was given in a span of 23 years with a very haphazard manner ! Like , Out of 114 chapters , some portion of 96th chapter was given first !! then some parts of 68th chapter, then some parts of 73th chapter !! 3. Whenever a verse(Ayaat) or a Chapter(sura) was given, it was fully memorized by his companions. So no change or correction could be made. 4. ===== 1. It gives many scientific facts which was unknown that time. 2. Not a single verse of the Quran proved wrong. 3. GOD promised HE will Guard The Book from being corrupted. And HE did a Miracle to do that. The Holy Quran is The Only Book of the world which is memorized cover to cover by Millions of people. (At least 50 million in today) But the miracle is , Those people who memorized the whole Book in Arabic, They even can not memorize the same book in their mother language. 5. ==== why you should read the Qur'an yourself. The main purpose of the Quran is - 1.To know the right definition and attributes of the true One GOD. 2. To know the purpose of your existence. 3. How to achieve that purpose or success of your life. And what your fate will be - in success or in failure. So read the Book in your language and be successful. This is the only Book in the world which is kept uncorrupted for more than 1400 years. The only Book millions of people memorized letter to letter from cover to cover even today. "Verily It is We Who have sent down The Qur'an and surely, We will guard it from corruption." [Al Qur'an 15:9 ] "No Falsehood can enter into it - from before or behind it is sent down by the All-Wise, Worthy of all praise." [Al Qur'an 41:42 ] 115. "And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and justice. None can change His Words. And He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower. 116. if you obey most of the people on earth, they will mislead you far away from the true Path of ALLAH. Because they follow nothing but conjectures, and they do nothing but lie. [Al Qur'an 6:115 -116 ] Follow the command of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) - "Seek the truth and Truth shall Free you''. [Gospel of John 8: 32] May ALLAH guide us to the path of Truth. 6.
@thesocialapologist 5 күн бұрын
So many claims, but can you back them up? The Qur'an being memorized is actually a Qira'at, named Hafs. You probably recite this one. Why not the Warsh though? Or one of the other 30 Qira'at? Perhaps because they have contradictions between them? Here are a couple, perhaps you can clarify them? Or did Allah only protect the Hafs version? And how would you know that the Hafs is the true one? List of contradictions: Q3:146 “Hafs” version says “And many a prophet FOUGHT alongside large bands of men…” “alBazzi” version says “And may a Prophet WAS KILLED alongside large bands of men…” So which is it? Because it is clearly different. Did the prophets fight alongside (active verb) or get killed (passive verb) Q2:140 “Hafs” version says “Or do YOU say that Abraham and Isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” “Warsh” version says “Or do THEY say that Abraham and isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” Is it directly addressed to YOU, or indirectly to THEY? This changes the meaning due to whom is being spoken at. Q2:271 “Hafs” version says “And it is better for you, and HE will expiate from you some of your sins…” “alSusi” version says “And it is better for you, and WE will expiate from you some of your sins…” Is it WE (the person speaking here) or HE (someone other than the person speaking) that will expiate some of your sins? Q10:2 Warsh: "Rajulun" (A man) Ibn Kathir: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. Q12:80 Hafs: "Falamma istayasu minhu" (When they despaired of him) Hamzah: "Falamma istayasu bihi" (When they despaired with him) Difference: "Minhu" (of him) vs. "Bihi" (with him). Q10:2 Khalaf: "Rajulun" (A man) Al-Layth: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. List of contradictions: Q3:146 “Hafs” version says “And many a prophet FOUGHT alongside large bands of men…” “alBazzi” version says “And may a Prophet WAS KILLED alongside large bands of men…” So which is it? Because it is clearly different. Did the prophets fight alongside (active verb) or get killed (passive verb) Q2:140 “Hafs” version says “Or do YOU say that Abraham and Isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” “Warsh” version says “Or do THEY say that Abraham and isma’il and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes of Israel…” Is it directly addressed to YOU, or indirectly to THEY? This changes the meaning due to whom is being spoken at. Q2:271 “Hafs” version says “And it is better for you, and HE will expiate from you some of your sins…” “alSusi” version says “And it is better for you, and WE will expiate from you some of your sins…” Is it WE (the person speaking here) or HE (someone other than the person speaking) that will expiate some of your sins? Q10:2 Warsh: "Rajulun" (A man) Ibn Kathir: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. Q12:80 Hafs: "Falamma istayasu minhu" (When they despaired of him) Hamzah: "Falamma istayasu bihi" (When they despaired with him) Difference: "Minhu" (of him) vs. "Bihi" (with him). Q10:2 Khalaf: "Rajulun" (A man) Al-Layth: "Rijalan" (Men) Difference: Singular vs. plural form. Let's start with the first one. Did prophets fight alongside, or were they killed? Because in the context of reading that they fought (without it mentioning they perished) is very different from a statement being made that the prophets were killed among large bands of men. Even the second one is a contradiction, because if it is you, then it cannot be they/them, and vice versa. Even regarding the Qur'an, how can you definitively claim 114 Surah's, when you have: Ubai Ibn Ka’b has 116 surah’s Ibn Mas’ud has 110 surah’s Ibn Musa has 114 surah’s Zaid Ibn Thabit’s Qur’an, which is the one used for the standardized Qur’an, has over 15,000 differences from the other three Qur’ans listed here above, as found by Arthur Jeffrey. According to Smith (Fadi and Smith 2021b) there are 5000 differences between the Hafs and the Warsh The six earliest Qur’anic manuscripts, TOPKAPI, SAMMARQAND, MA’IL, HOUSEINI, PETROPOLITANUS and SANA’A are not of the Mushafs that Uthmān had sent to the various centers” (Altıkulaç 2007). When looking at these 30 Qira'ats, these transmitters contain 93,263 differences from the readers, according to Al Fadi & Smith (2021). References: Altıkulaç, Tayyar. 2007. Al-Mushaf Al-Sharif Attributed to Uthman Bin Affan (The Copy at Topkapı Palace Museum in Istanbul). 1st ed. Istanbul: IRCICA.
@vvaloachi7263 2 күн бұрын
@@thesocialapologist // Qs = By the way, even today, there are various readings of the Qur'anic text. the modern standardized version of the Qur'an that most Muslims read today isn't the only one // This issue is little bit deep. So I request your further attention to understand the topic. Before understanding what is -''Various readings of the Qur'anic text'' we must understand first what it is not. [ Please Note = I will give the example of Bible, so that you may easily understand only, Here my intention is not to degrade the Bible or to prove the Bible wrong. I don't know any better example than the bible to discuss this topic. So please do not misunderstand me on that issue. You may think it is not the Bible but any other book. Here the Bible example is - ''Only for educational purpose''.] [1] What it is not = ================= like the Bible has different ''Versions'' , where the protestant version has 66 books , And Catholic Bible has 73 books. The Ethiopian Orthodox canon has got 81 books . There are more than 40 Gospels found, and they had different views on the nature of the Christ. There is a whole subject called "Christology'', which discuss on this issue. Only four Gospel are accepted in the canon, others are rejected as “Apocryphal Gospels” , like Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Barnabas, Gospel of Judas , Gospel of Mary , Gospel of James . . . . etc. The Gospels which accepted in the canon has revised to be more accurate. Hence came The ''Revised Standard Version'' The scholars revised the Bible and exclude some verses as ''Fabrication'' which were later added and not found in earlier manuscripts. And Even there is dispute among the Christians, Whether The Bible itself is the actual ''Word of God'' or only the ''Message of the Bible'' is from God. And there is also dispute about, whether the Bible writers were inspired by Holy spirit or it is written according to their own ''Observational view''. And all the books of the New Testament were written many years after the departure of Jesus Christ(pbuh), None of the Book was authorized by Jesus Christ himself. But the ''Various readings of the Qur'anic text'' is not like that. it is = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) They all are approved from God. (2) They all are Authorized by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself. [ Chapter: The Qur'an was revealed to be recited in seven different ways Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Angel Gabriel recited the Qur'an to me in one way. Then I requested him to read it in another way, and continued asking him to recite it in other ways, and he recited it in several ways till he ultimately recited it in seven different ways." ] (3) They all mean the same thing. (4) They all are the actual Word of God . (5) They all are preserved. (6) Muslims have no dispute on this issue. The whole Muslim Ummah follow the same Quran. (7) They all contain the same number of chapter and has same number of verses. not a single verse is missing. (8) There is not a single chapter , nor even a single verse of the Quran , which Muslims dispute about, whether that is a part of the Quran or not. (9) These differences are so minute and insignificant that 99.99% Muslims don't even know about it. If two different variant is shown side by side, Anyone will even have a hard time to recognize any difference. Now I will discuss what is -''Various readings of the Qur'anic text'' ========================================================= 1. Difference in Wording = Ex - Worship God alone, this is the straight path. Worship God alone, that is the straight path. The word of your Lord has been fulfilled with Truth and Justice. The words of your Lord have been fulfilled with Truth and Justice. The disbelievers say, this is surely a magician. The disbelievers say, this is surely a work of magic. 2. Difference of pronunciation. Just like American & British difference of pronunciation of English. Often = offen Often = off-ten. 3. Difference of a letter. Ex- Remember our slave . . . Remember our slaves . . . Feed a poor man. Feed poor men. 4. Very occasionally different word with different meaning , but they do not contradict , they give additional information. And both are correct. Ex- The religious leaders know the religion. The religious leaders teach the religion. To easily understand what it is - [14 min video ] Different qirat & ahruf of the Quran - Yasir Qadhi If anyone has more interest to go some deep = [33 min video] Dr. Yasir Qadhi Destroys The Myth Of Different Versions Of Quran Why so = ------------------ Just like God is every way unique and different form the creation, His Book is also Unique and different in every way from the books of Men. There is not a single book in the word, Neither Arabic nor other, That have this criteria, Many different reading but exactly same meaning. Anyone read the Quran know, it is not like we write in sequences. its style, its message, its hearing, it's appeal, it's teaching, it's power , it's audience, it's authority . . . in every way different. (There is neither any religion nor any ''ism'' was, is or will be till the Day of Judgement that Quran does not talk about. But it's approaching style is different.) As a whole it is the unique beauty of the Quran that it can be recited in different manners with the exact same meaning. It is just like - ''Seven different color of the same Model of a Car,'' All are made by the same company. They all are same in every manner & function, but you can choose the color as you like.'' If you want to hear yourself - [5 min video] Surah Ikhlas in 10 Different Styles Meaning of that Sura = 1. Say : HE is ALLAH, The One and Only; 2. The Eternal, The Independent, The Absolute Supreme. 3. HE begets not, nor is HE begotten; 4. And there is no any likeness to HIM or equal to HIM. [AL Quran 112 : 1- 4] Are you not amazed that 1.8 Billion people memorized the Quran, Total or some portion in it's Original language ? There are more than 50 Million people in todays world who memorize the whole Quran in it's original Arabic language!! And there is not any dispute about it ? How many people have you seen in your life who memorized the whole Bible in its original language..? (Jesus spoke Aramaic but all original Gospels are in Greek) This cover to cover memorization is a living Miracle of GOD to protect the book from any corruption.
@LAila-qf4ww 18 күн бұрын
Asa-Would you please change the title? It’s misleading
@hoopoe3093 18 күн бұрын
The Bible says that God created light on the first day with morning & night. This was impossible as the heavenly bodies were created on the 4th day. 😮
@DAWAHTALK-Media 18 күн бұрын
@@hoopoe3093 true And such errors are only possible due to the unscientific knowledge of the writers of the Bible
@LoveFire 18 күн бұрын
Peace, Exactly, Science is your criterion which is telling you how to interpret the Quran. You will continuously reinterpret the Quran whenever science come to a fact or a proven theory that contradicts your current interpretation. Then a logical question is why you are holding on Quran where you are verifying it by science?
@gezimislamaj5309 18 күн бұрын
Seriously what are you smoking? The Arabic language has been there for millennials and you're saying some childish stuff? Go learn Arabic and try to disprove what he said, stop acting smart here kiddo
@CesarGomez-di1lv 18 күн бұрын
🔥....... SHAMED ON you saying that Sinning Muhammad is THE HOLY SPIRIT!....... IT IS a gravious blasphemy you are proclaiming, you are trying to rob the HOLY SPIRIT his HOLY Title!....... Muhammad is NOT comforter!....... WHAT HE brought to Islam was deceptions, trouble and NOT comfort!....... 🔥
@CesarGomez-di1lv 18 күн бұрын
🔥....... ANOTHER LIAR!....... Like Ahmed Deedat Satan a.k.a Allah attack dog; then followed by Zakir Naik Deedats parrot-echo; then this one rising another liar!....... 🔥
@CesarGomez-di1lv 18 күн бұрын
🔥....... THE HOLY SPIRIT is not Muhammad!....... Muhammad is NOT the HOLY SPIRIT!....... Muhammad is NOT holy, but is a sinner!....... 🔥....... THIS IS what The Lord Jesus Christ said concerning the likes of Muhammad, Ahmed Deedat, Zakir Naik, and like you!....... Matthew 7:15; Revelation 22:18-19 KJV Bible....... 🔥
@moonmoonStar 18 күн бұрын
the beauty of Quran. the precise word ayyam which can means Days / Periods / Epoch / Era / Time-frame. while Bible Genesis makes a huge WRONG mistake that the 6 days are the 24h cycle hence it disqualified Bible texts came from God.
@CesarGomez-di1lv 18 күн бұрын
🔥 ....... BEWARE OF false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves....... Matthew 7:15 KJV Bible....... 🔥
@CesarGomez-di1lv 18 күн бұрын
🔥....... THE HOLY SPIRIT is NOT Muhammad!....... Muhammad is NOT the HOLY SPIRIT!....... Muhammad is NOT holy!....... 🔥
@armyofmehedi 18 күн бұрын
Allah hu akbar
@CesarGomez-di1lv 18 күн бұрын
🔥 BOTH!....... HE IS God!....... HE IS Man!....... HE IS Servant!....... 🔥
@DAWAHTALK-Media 10 күн бұрын
@@CesarGomez-di1lv that’s like saying ‘he is God’ and ‘he isn’t God’! It’s a false dichotomy Bible says “God is not a man….” Numbers 23:19
@CesarGomez-di1lv 18 күн бұрын
🔥 ....... YES! HE is in the Bible!....... BEWARE OF false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves....... Matthew 7:15 KJV Bible....... 🔥
@j2shoes288 15 күн бұрын
while, the name Jesus doesn't exist in the Old Testament, the name Muhammad is found in Song of Solomon. You sound very uneducated?
@madhusoodan2881 19 күн бұрын
Don't lie bloody fool...
@fardenanz 19 күн бұрын
Masya Allah. Pintar
@user-bf7zr6kq4s 20 күн бұрын
This is hilarious 😹
@artanaxhirexha6917 20 күн бұрын
This prophecy has many problems and has nothing to do with Jesus First of all, if we look at the Hebrew bible (the original language of the OT) we see that the word used for “virgin” is “almah”, BUT almah does not mean at all virgin, but it means “young woman”. “Bethulah” means “virgin”. In most of the versions of the bible, they have translated it as “virgin” because this fits with the prophecy. There are only a few biblical versions that have translated it correctly, for example the Revised Standard Version (RSV). Another problem with this prophecy is that this was fulfilled hundreds of years before Jesus.When we read the context from verse 1-17 we can see clearly that this prophecy has NOTHING to do with Jesus. This promise of God was fulfilled in 2 Kings 16:9 where it says: ”The king of Assyria complied by attacking Damascus and capturing it. He deported its inhabitants to Kir and put Rezin to death. So, this child was born, his mother called him Emmanuel and the Assyrians defeated the two kings that threatened Ahaz. So the prophecy was fulfilled here, many many centuries before the coming of Jesus. Here also it is given a limited time of this prophecy, and that is: “before the boy knows enough to reject the wrong and choose the right”. So this sign had to be something related with Ahaz and not 700 years after because if the success of Ahaz would have been after 700 years then the prophecy would have had no logic at all. Another problem with this prophecy is that nobody in his life didn’t call Jesus Emmanuel, nobody, not his mother, not his apostles, nobody, and on the other hand the prophecy says that this child will be called Emmanuel. Another problem here is that in Isaiah 7:15, 16 it says that he didn’t know the wrong and the right. If Christians say that Jesus is God, then how is it possible that God doesn’t know what is wrong and what is right??!! Some christian scholars say that this is a double prophecy, once this prophecy was fulfilled in the time of Isaiah and Ahaz and the second time with Jesus. But the problem is that christians say that this prophecy has to do with a virgin birth. If the birth of Jesus was the second virgin birth, then where is the first one? Will they accept another virgin birth??!!
@STORM69esports 20 күн бұрын
After Dr Zakir naik and Mohmmad Hijab , he is the best debater and destroyer of Christianity 😂😂😂
@DAWAHTALK-Media 20 күн бұрын
@@STORM69esports InshaAllah, May Allah give more strength to Muslim preachers to defend Islam
@STORM69esports 20 күн бұрын
@@DAWAHTALK-Media Insha'Allah, is Waseem from Australia?
@DAWAHTALK-Media 20 күн бұрын
@@STORM69esports yes , Melbourne based. Originally he hails from India
@STORM69esports 20 күн бұрын
@@DAWAHTALK-Media I was thinking only because he looks Indian , btw I m too Indian
@DAWAHTALK-Media 20 күн бұрын
@@STORM69esports oh ok MashaAllah May Allah bless all righteous indians and the scholars there who has instilled love of the Deen in its inhabitants