Always excellent content!

"..how do they survive.." ? They don't. They are pretty much trashed after each meet.

During the 1970s I flew a number of tactical aircraft for which a single analogue INS was the primary navigation aid. Even then they were remarkably accurate and reliable. Typically present position drift rates were better than 1nm/hr. These early systems were fairly clunky analogue systems with lots of moving parts. Since then there have been many improvements. Modern INS are fully digital and essentially solid state with few if any moving parts with all the mechanical functions reduced to mathematical algorithms running in a computer. A computer card incorporating a fully functional INS chip can now be purchased for as little as $1,000.

cool

❤❤❤

Build a bunker caked in chrome?

I grew up in Ventura and we saw it fly frequently. It was being flown out of Oxnard AFB.

Who cares about someone believe Moon is hollow or not, but Moon is not belongs to earth and earthlings.

So what I heard is if humans weren’t so stubborn about tradition we could have EVEN FASTER dragster?

That was totally fascinating! 🙌 thanks for posting

ok And how did lunar habitats react to quakes? 07:16

The MAFIA didn't "DIE",.... IT BEGAN TO GOVERN❤

There is nothing more false than the STORIES WE ACCEPT❤

5:56 you look just like him

Nuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Lise Meitner was also key to the Straßmann - Hahn discovery of Uranium Fission. She was just as instrumental as the other two, yet is never acknowledged. Indeed, she was essential, as she had a command of the relevant mathematics that the other two were ignorant of, and was essential to the reasoning and calculations that showed exactly what had been observed.

Of all the things the Americans did in the sixties and seventies, they cut the budget to the one thing they actually succeeded in....

You just glossed over the fact that testing began before Reagan was inaugurated, and seem to give him credit for something he had nothing to do with.

Those aliens sure are nice to us. They build all our stone monuments for us, build moons for us, and who knows what else? I guess they don’t have much else to do but carve stone and create entire planetoids just for us. Yay aliens! 👽🖖🏻

Don't usually comment but, no click bait key concepts laid out and just facts, THANK YOU

You got so much of the other sides facts and what they believe and why wrong almost to a point it seems to been done on purpose

Your awsome ail!

uh no. Your physics is incorrect. Orbits that are affected by Earth's atmosphere, speed up and the line of nodes of the orbit precesses. They don't slow down.

I think Neil Degrasse Tyson said, Money Isnt An Excuse. Think of the Trillions spent on the military.

If you have never seen one run live you can't believe how fast something can accelerate...

People assume that any technician could successfully carry out some critical fabrication step. That is not always true. I know of one critical step in space manufacture that only one tech could do. No one else was able to do it properly. The tech's process was studied intensely to figure out what was different but unsuccessfully.

The Merlin and Griffon had 4 valves per cylinder..

Oh yes, yes, we’re supposed to believe that they went to the moon and landed on the moon in the 1960s with pocket calculator technology, and today it is such a difficult thing to do! Hogwash! We never landed on the moon! Where was the giant desk cloud from the lunar landing? There was no dust cloud created because there was no real landing ever filmed! It was filmed in a desert and cables lowering the land to the desert surface.

Nice shirt

but if it's not a problem why they work so hard on solving it? 🤔

How come this is not as prevalent as all the moon landing deniers post. It’s a really compelling piece of evidence presented by a guy who I do not think is making it up.

The Range program was to get close images of the Moon. It was the Lunar Orbiter from 1966 to 1967 that imaged the possible Apollo landing sites. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranger_program en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Orbiter_program

A most interesting and well written presentation. However the person or persons responsible for the video footage really botched their job as numerous references were made to the B-29 which is vastly different in appearance and performance than the passenger based aircraft shown. Though many folks might not notice these egregious errors it none the less diminishes the credibility of the presentation and the presenter.

Why should we believe this? We were in a very Cold War with the Russkies at the time and they were not to be trusted in any manner whatsoever. I want to see the data and any other documentation that exists for this supposed "record".

RoE in an urban combat environ is a nightmare. Human in the loop is a large leap to escape from. Indecision VS. self-destruction has it's own challenges. Perhaps the best segway to warfare and ethics. Should it be pursued?.. begs the question: Are we choosing statistics over potentials? I say: Don't choose limiting paths. What is necessity and what is inextricable?

People Washington DC must be stopped . We must stop all the hate and ileagal wars

Dont let these people lie to you all people !! Yes they could of been saved . I promise Russia could of helped saved them !! But they are hiding this from you all

The undersea threats are out of my sphere, but I certainly recognize what they are. Finance is a functional dependency hence it's medium of communication is a modern dependency. God help us keeps things in conscience.

So interesting that at 6:35, EM eavesdropping is shown and with potential a cause for fiber optic?

Anyone acquainted with the research facilties near Albuquerque looks at this and says: oh, that's why🤔. Now for the engineering, 😎

What an unexpected longevity🤔 Strange how engineering applied by necessity endures. Nice commentary on 'Air Force' decision which is likely a blending of international diplomacy. Hats off to the engineering teams tasked with integration🎖️

I suppose that just like all arms races this one will carry on until expense becomes the limiting factor, like when your hypothetical HAS is impervious but costs $250M to build but the aircraft you're sheltering in it only cost $40M. Or when you're having to drop a $250M bomb to destroy a $40M aircraft on the ground and realise it's easier to wait for it to take off, bean it with a €2M missile from 200 km away and tag the driver WSO too, and call it a job well done. Which way it'll go then I really don't know. Resort to NBC _(or whatever you youngins call it these days)_ or poison/pollute/contaminate the water supply. Maybe pump 20 tonnes of 60/40 kerosene/bunker oil in to the ventilation system, give it a day to soak in and put a match to it, that'd be my best guess. Flames can be a bit ouchie or so I've heard, but you'd also get the heat build up and thick black smoke, plus that fire's gonna rip every last scrap of oxygen out of the air at which point everything else is moot anyway. Heh, anything you did to try to rectify the situation - vent the smoke and/or heat, pump in additional clean air or oxygen from internal tanks etc - would make things get way worse rather than better.

Wait wait wait, there are regulations? Does that mean we could go even faster?

I agree about the cat thing comment.

Perhaps they should contact Pratt & Whitney to see if they have the phone numbers of the retired engineers that were sent to California to show them how to build it.

Pathetic engine porn

No single person “invented” nuclear weapons. No single person even invented those particular bombs. It is a misunderstanding to even think that is possible.

Anyone who knows the answer has to be 42

The stat at 4:35 about the Sun fusing 4.26 MT of Hydrogen to Helium is wrong. 4.26 MT is the mass deficit that's converted to energy, the Sun actually converts 600MT of H to 596MT of Helium each second, so the 4.26MT is the difference.

Every time he says giga watts, I think we are talking about making a time machine to go back to the future.