Well that is AI for you… ohh no it is an actual picture of him…
@amalirfan3 күн бұрын
@@CubeChemistry611😂, I am sure it's close to average length 😅
@CubeChemistry6113 күн бұрын
I tried to find info on the length of his fingers but…. Had no luck finding it…
@hexagon88994 күн бұрын
also, oganneson is the only one named after someone who is currently alive today iirc
@CubeChemistry6114 күн бұрын
That is so True!!
@RoRo-GG884 күн бұрын
Another great video 👌🏽
@CubeChemistry6114 күн бұрын
Thanks Much appreciated!!
@juliandevries28355 күн бұрын
So a question that popped up: So seaborgium alone is not stable. Suppose we would make a lot of seaborgium and clump it together. Is there a possibility that it will become stable if we simply make a 'mountain of seaborgium' or will it be just as unstable as a single element. (H20 alone behaves completely different than a 'mount of H2O' aka water).
@CubeChemistry6115 күн бұрын
A single element is as unstable in this case as a lot of the substance. So 1 atom of seaborgium behaves the same way(or is as unstable) as 20 million atoms of Seaborgium. What do you mean exactly when you say H2O behaves differently in 1 molecule then when you have a ton of it? Bare in mind that we are talking about Seaborgium the element and H2O the molecule.
@juliandevries28355 күн бұрын
Whahahaha, poor editor. Hopefully the coffe helped 😀!!
@CubeChemistry6115 күн бұрын
It did, still she warned me to pay more attention next time.
@jaceklewandowski2546 күн бұрын
Just put it in the frezer :P Water changes in ice - throw it away and you have more % alcohol in alcohol :)
@CubeChemistry6116 күн бұрын
That could be a thing, the problem is the higher percentage of alcohol the lower the freezing point of the mixture… and I do not have a freezer that freezes to -59 degrees Celsius or -75 degrees Fahrenheit… ;)
@rixogtr9 күн бұрын
The intro song gives me Paul Kalkbrenner vibes.
@CubeChemistry6119 күн бұрын
I see what you mean!!
@gadkinson10 күн бұрын
Hey friend! Great video I know fuck all, but maybe it'll help your channel gain more traction: I think the thumbnail could use some refinement. There's a lot of improvement, but the subject is too "small". For instance, I think you could benefit from having the image to the left be the main focus and have some supporting aspects around it. The stylized blue border you used makes it hard to quickly visually grasp, which is important for.grabbing a viewers attention and... Clicking! Anyways, I like what your building here. Take that with a pinch of salt. And good luck with your channel man!
@CubeChemistry61110 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, I will definitely keep this in mind. So basically what you mean is instead of separating the the images like I do now. I should take 1 picture and move from there to grab the focus? I will experiment with that in future video's! Feedback is always welcome since it will make the channel better :).
@juliandevries283512 күн бұрын
Couldn't you simply reduce the amount of sand instead of removing the sand completely?
@CubeChemistry61112 күн бұрын
Eventualy the sand would have been hot enough but we were in a hurry so this turned out to be much faster. By then the sand was already quite hot and we then had to let it cool down before we could remove some of it.
@courtneygoff651316 күн бұрын
Turn the music down you can’t hear what you’re saying
@matthewquinn739816 күн бұрын
She gets it.
@CubeChemistry61116 күн бұрын
Thanks for the tip. It seemed fine on my PC. I adjusted it now.
@juliandevries283525 күн бұрын
Which 2 elements react most extremely with each other to create the biggest bang possible? (given that the amount of material is equal on both sides)
@CubeChemistry61123 күн бұрын
So from what I understand the reaction between H2 + O2 is one of the most violent reactions. The reason is that it result in like a branching chain-reacting that keeps repeating itself.
@BooBuKittyPhuk28 күн бұрын
Had never thought of how they harvested spice... Cool
@CubeChemistry61128 күн бұрын
Nice!!
@MalawisLilleKanalАй бұрын
"I think easily accessible cinnamon who does not dissolve in water resembles spice pretty good, so let me demonstrate with sugar instead" ;-) Even with little water, they could use some kind of reflux if the spice is water soluble.
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
I thought about doing a similar experiment with cinnamon but very unfortunately very quickly found out that it would then be a very different experiment.
@MrBarryyoungАй бұрын
Hot water would provide a better if not near 100% yield. Water heating solar panels would cheaply provide the heat. The water shouldn't be too much of a problem since it could be easily condensed and recovered for reuse, and the cost of spice is more expensive. The heat from the sun to recrystallize would be cheap as well. Of course this all depends on the solubility of the spice (after looking online, it looks like water is hard to separate from spice). Different solvents could be cheaper/better.
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Very true!! What solvent would you suggest?
@paradiselost9946Ай бұрын
carefully calculated cyclonic filters... denser material will fall out first.
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Very creative thanks!
@paradiselost9946Ай бұрын
@@CubeChemistry611 electrostatics is another one...
@omer1996d2Ай бұрын
Wouldn't it also be possible to use a mechanical process instead? If you assume spice has buoyancy in moving sand
@omer1996d2Ай бұрын
A centrifugal process could also be used if spice is denser/less dense than sand
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Yes that would definitely make sense!!
@nerdsunscripted624Ай бұрын
Neat! Haven’t seen dune 2 yet, but being that water is so rare on Arakkis that spitting on someone is a gesture of politeness for giving them your moisture, I don’t think separating with water would be a good way would it? My first thought is to use spinning chambers of various hole sizes to filter out the very fine dust spice from the heavy grains of sand. From there you can sift in a vibrating bed to separate light particles from heavy particles. There’s steps from there for further refinement but truthfully it doesn’t seem that finer refinement from that is necessary for how they use it
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
What a lovely answer. Yes i also do not think they would use water. The solution you propose sounds a lot better!!
@henkvanderklokАй бұрын
Everyone on the internet: "The spice must flow." Cube Chemistry: "Actually, the spice must drip."
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Haha yep it drips alright!!
@tijger5353Ай бұрын
Bro knows what music means😎🇺🇸
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Thanks!!
@juliandevries2835Ай бұрын
Some spices are also water soluble. Can you reclaim those spices in the same way, or does this only work for sugar?
@infectedrainbowАй бұрын
This is the most basic chemical purification technique. It works on anything as long as you have the right solvents.
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Thanks for answering could not have said it better myself!!
@peterolsen9131Ай бұрын
i think the real beauty of thorium if we design a reactor around its breeding and burning the resultant u233, is that its on the moon, in asteroids, on mars , and probably everywhere in the universe! thorium will take us to the stars and there will be fuel when we get there as well as along the way!
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Awesome perspective I did not even think about it but the modular way in which they are currently thinking would be very suitable to indeed send in space!!
@peterolsen9131Ай бұрын
@@CubeChemistry611 thank you!
@spamviking8591Ай бұрын
I know that you can't buy tennessine, and if I recall, it has a half life of a few tens of milliseconds anyway, so do they just send you a radioactive warning sign in acrylic if you order it?
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Exactly. I know slightly disappointing but yes. I knew this before I got the subscription though and I am ok with it. There are about 20 elements that will show up with just the warning sign in my mailbox because of that reason. But for my purpose I am ok with that, I will discuss them in video's.
@spamviking8591Ай бұрын
@@CubeChemistry611 probably for the best. I don’t want to contemplate just how radioactive a substance with a millisecond scale half life is.
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
@@spamviking8591 I agree since the halftime is so dramatic the radiation will also be dramatic!
@icastmoustache9387Ай бұрын
am I being nitpicky or stupid or was there a mistake in explaining what half life is? because as I understand it, in 14 billion years, HALF of that thorium will be gone, not all of it. am I living a lie here?
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Sharp and no that is not being nitpicky that is correctly correcting mistakes. Yes you are absolutely right. Thanks for pointing this out. Halftime is of course the time it takes for Half of the element to decay. SO to correct my mistake in 14.5 billion years about half of the Thorium in the cube will be left. Thanks for pointing this out!!
@soul777EXTАй бұрын
U didn't say about how much is required for lifetime energy
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
The short answer is a marble. But this is a short taken from my longer video in which I indeed also tell the answer. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qLCdadJ1vL6cdX0.html
@henkvanderklokАй бұрын
Thor had an element named after him… Tony won’t like that when he finds out.
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
There is also this rivalry between Hulk and Thor. Yet there is no element named Hulkonion....
@juliandevries2835Ай бұрын
What does it mean to 'discover' thorium in 1828? It was mined before that I would assume?
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
Yes it was mined before. So in this case it was not literally that an Thorium was discovered what was discovered was that it was an element that we did not know the properties off. To be precise Berzelius received a mineral from Morton Esmark who went to his father and he could not identify what his son had found. He send Morton to Berzelius who then found out that that this was a material that was not recorded till this point.
@juliandevries2835Ай бұрын
@@CubeChemistry611 that is awesome!
@Speed122366Ай бұрын
SCIENCE IS SO COOL!
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
I could not agree more!!
@juliandevries2835Ай бұрын
Do all atoms have stable and unstable forms?
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
No most of them have unstable forms but not of them have stable forms. In fact after the element of Lead in the periodic table(Element 82) all elements are unstable and will decay over a period of time. That period can sometimes be billions of years but that does not change the fact that the elements are unstable.
@juliandevries2835Ай бұрын
What makes a battery leak in the first place?
@CubeChemistry611Ай бұрын
So when a battery is empty slowly a gas will pile up inside of the battery. This Hydrogen gas cannot go anywhere and could explode if it will remain. For this reason battery manufactures created a system that when the battery is empty and the gas will pile up the safety barrier will break. The chemicals will come out in the air and due to a reaction with the air(corrosion) crystals will form and this is the oxide we removed.
@juliandevries28352 ай бұрын
Does this count for elements that have 2 more electrons, or 2 less?
@CubeChemistry6112 ай бұрын
Good question i’ll cover that in the next episode!!
@juliandevries28352 ай бұрын
Is the ?astenai? temprature the same for any combination of metals, or is 600 just for the specific combination of titanium and nickel?
@CubeChemistry6112 ай бұрын
That is specific for the alloy that you make. Every element and therefore every alloy has a different melting point or period.
@juliandevries28352 ай бұрын
@@CubeChemistry611 Ahhh, that makes sense. Thanks!
@juliandevries28352 ай бұрын
So why do meteorites contain nickel?
@CubeChemistry6112 ай бұрын
Nickel and Iron are among the most common metals in the universe. When solo systems such as ours are created that tends to be very violent. In these processes Nickel and Iron are being created. This probably raises the question why we don't see a lot of Nickel and Iron at the surface of the earth? The reason for that is that erosion on our planet made the Nickel and Iron disappear in layers under the ground. For meteorites this is not the case and this is why when they crash onto the earth they are made mostly out of Iron and Nickel.
@juliandevries28352 ай бұрын
You have the average number, because some occur more in nature than others. Could you explain why some combinations in nature occur more than others?
@CubeChemistry6112 ай бұрын
This seems to be because of the origin of the elements. Elements decay into other elements. What this decay means i will tell in followup video's but for now you could state that whenever an element decay's into another element in this case Carbon it likely had another element as origin.
@juliandevries28352 ай бұрын
Will you use the same experiments in Dutch and English, or are the two going to diverge?
@CubeChemistry6112 ай бұрын
There will be differences in the channels. However the chronological order will be similar.