We expect protests across Europe to stop the crazy politicians from the EU who have a Putin complex. They wanted to destroy Russia, and now that they see that the EU will be economically destroyed, they want to attack Russia in an attempt to justify their failure. Madhouse in the EU. .

You reckon, you can do another review on the Altay tank... It just entered mass production a couple of days ago

Soviet tanks are indeed death traps.

lmao, Worst modern tank? Is this guy for real

Something people don't talk about is the lack of visibility and awareness you have In a tank, if you position badly and your commander can't see, you are sitting in a metal coffin.

It's an unfortunate combination of (1) overmatch by anti-tank weapons, tanks today (regardless of nation) are susceptible to anti-tank weaponry. No practical and mass produceable form of active protection against all aspect incoming tandem warheads yet exists. (2) The exposed ammunition in the crew compartment in the case of Russian autoloaders, tragically results in catastrophic detonation and the complete loss of the crew/tank. It would require a fundamental redesign of the fighting compartment to include either a sealed compartment with vent chutes or panels to redirect the explosion away from the crew and or a reformulation of the propellant compound to be functionally inert until fired. Both of which are much easier said than done, let alone put into mass production. I think it's important to remember these aren't just 'tanks' being destroyed, these are young men being killed. 40-50-year-old tech, that they have no control over, obviously isn't an ideal configuration for the modern battlefield. Hopefully, in the near future All nations will price a premium on crew survivability when it comes to the configuration of armored fighting vehicles including tanks. Given the demographic trends, now more than ever it is relatively easy to replace a tank in 12-18 months. Less so the experience, let alone THE LIVES of the human beings operating them.

How about the Abrams and Cheetah tanks 😅

this video aged poorly

I love how there's no actual statistics, just some photos and videos and then say Russia tanks explode a lot 😂

What they need is to get the German gunpowder it reduces the chance of getting a space program turret and upgrade the armored of ammo compartment and lower it more

Now the Lazerpig guy has become an armchair twitter politician and thinks everyone is a bundle of sticks.

I think the main problem with the carousel auto-loader ammunition being placed horizontally was that in the old days of tank on tank warfare, these have a low probability of getting hit because they are located quite low in the tank. However things changed quite recently especially during the Ukraine war were top attack weapons and drones became more common compared to tank on tank engagements. Here a penetration on the top of the turret by the hot explosive jet of a HE ammo is more catastrophic since the ammo stored horizontally in the carousel presents a wider aspect and becomes easier to hit (and to cook off)

Don't worry about the Abrams tanks they where only sent so German would supply the leopards.

The latest abrams blowout panels has the ammo bolted to the panel. So when the ammo starts blowing up. It's takes all of the other unexploded ammo with it.

Its a good idea and the ammo is stored correctly (bottom center mass). Its just the fact that it is paired with such a small hull that pretty much makes it an easy jack in the box of a tank.

No

If they consistently pop the turret in such dramatic fashion, to the average soldier, the design doesn't matter. They are death traps.

russia is the circus of the earth and putin is the clown

I love the Design of the first Autoloader, I think they did a great Job giving the Information they had at that Time.

What about the hydraulic fluid in the T80 autolaoder as well as the charges and shells, the whole thing is a massive bomb

I wonder if American M900 can be sent to equip these tanks.

Autoloader is just the device that loads the ammunition. More accurate to say it's because they're sitting on an ammo carousel waiting to turn them into cosmonauts.

It's all about crew survivability. The army will assign any survivors to a new tank.

all idf fanboys coping

Does Russia even have the means or capabilities to mass produce the insensitive propellant for their shells??

at about 4:00 they talk about how ammo is stored out of the carousel and that that is a reason for ammo detonation, war thunder the game models that in for some of the tanks which is pretty cool in my opinion.

6:46 "most of the time" Yea, we really need someone to go and catalogue this. Type of tank, type of attack recive, and effect. We have a T-90 being struck by 2 bradlies and a Drone with minimal damage after all. Keep also in mind, if a tank is struck yet retreat is most likly to not being recorded pr the recodording NOT made public.

this all comes down to how the makers intend to use the tank. Russia used their tank to first break through the enemy line as fast as they could, and second to support their infantries. To achieve these objectives, Russia plays the balancing act between economics and crew protection. they are realist, they know tanks cannot win all the intended purposes but believe that quantity is a quality in itself so they give enough protection so the crew can bail out but not sacrifice economics by building expensive tanks. most jack in the box happen long after the crew bail out.

The Red Effect problem. The M1-Abrams only does well when used in the way it is supposed to. It is a hull-down vehicle designed for offensive ranged combat. They are not Russian tanks, they aren't designed to be in the middle of the open and be expendable, these are sniper tanks, and the Abrams does that job well.

I prefer the bmp 3

The drone operator must have been nutting to see a tank without a cage.

Another way to increase all crews survival chances (both ru and ukr) would be to stop the war.

That's why object 148 (T-14) tries to combine both approaches, with ammunition still being positioned at the bottom of the hull (for lower hit probability), but with the crew isolated in a separate armored compartment in case of catastrophic detonation.

❤❤😂😂🎉😢😢😮😅

in addition to all of the above, it is worth adding that part of the reason why this happens is in the type of shells themselves, armor-piercing crowbars do not detonate - there is nothing to detonate there, but if the turret niche of an Abrams or leopard is filled with high-explosive shells, then no turret panels will save either the tank or the crew. Even the active burnout of such a quantity of explosives will not leave the crew a chance to evacuate, not to mention the detonation of shells behind a thin partition. in my opinion, the “carousel” is still preferable to the box behind the turret, which essentially represents a huge target, especially now, when the danger is mostly from above, and not from the side, it is quite difficult to get into the carousel, although of course it is worth continuing to work on improving it - protection of the AZ in general and each cell in particular, the German version of explosives, and so on. the best option is the T14 Armata - the crew is in a protected capsule, the AZ is separated by armored partitions from both the crew and the engine, and the best option for a turret box, in my opinion, is the French Leclerc - the automatic loader connected to the habitable compartment only by a shell supply shaft, which is opened automatically at the moment of shell delivery - good protection, no option to leave “doors” open. As for the many videos - how many Soviet tanks are there? thousands, and how many Abrams and leopards that participated in battles - a couple of dozen, there is simply nowhere to get comparable number an epic videos of burning out Abrams and leopards .

The main reason that Russian tanks explode is that there are thousands of them and they have been fighting for years, when the 30 Abrams that US deigned to supply to Ukraine are not even allowed to throw into battle.

Meanwhile, some completely burnt out leopards from a4 to a6: What are the "insensitive powder charges" in our shells!? Meanwhile, the Abrams who simply cannot get to the battlefield or live there even less: Yes, we just burn up without completing the combat mission, but for that we saved the crew!!!! (who will also fail to complete the combat task next time) PS: for those who are particularly critical of Russian tanks. 1) Look at the number of videos where tanks detonate in battle 2) Look at the number of videos where tanks have already been abandoned for various reasons (mines, breakdown, stuck or damaged by a projectile / drone (for example, an engine). The tanks are standing with their hatches open and they are being finished off by drones. After that, they burn out or detonate. 3) The video of the drone finishing off empty tanks will be hundreds of times more. If you really follow from the very beginning, you will understand this even without reading the message. 4) Tankers on the spot have more complaints about the reverse gear than about the ammunition. 5) For both sides of the conflict using T-series tanks, the situation is completely real. The situation is when the unit lost 80% of its vehicles and only 10% of its crews. 6) Only after these points above, really think about the effectiveness of tanks. Unlike the Abrams tanks, the T-series more often continues to move after the first (if not more) drone strike, while the American is eliminated from the game. You saved Abrams' crew! Now, without supplies from the USA, this tank crew will die as an infantryman))) "Stonks"!?!?!?)

Yep, only one comment: "used to be". Used to be less vulnerable, used to be seen as more survivable etc. (and I remember all that). And then - the cutting edge innovation, called "top attack" joined the chat (several decades after its implementation in western armies). This video should have been released before this war, it would be relevant then, not now

Can you make a video about all the T90Ms losses in Ukraine? Why so many?

the modern t-90m doesnt suffer from turret lobs too much. but the old designs have a significant problem.

I'm not really sure that crew survived. You might see them leave the tank "unharmed", but be sure there were a couple of drones waiting for those boys to play with.

I see most crews bail their T tanks... The difference is that you're watching Ukrainian channels where 110…% of Russian tanks explode. Your use of the word MOST is highly suspect.

JUNE 2024. THIS will NEVER be built......after Ukraine aka DRONES...... tanks are going to be on the backburner....

Я, думаю, это видео нужно будет переснять, после того как западные танки начнут активно возить фугасы, а не ломики.

Title is so dumb, that we can make video with title - is lack of autoloader reason why Abrams tanks explode so easy?

You are talking about those improvements like russians gives a fuck about lives of other russians

The issue is pinpointed by RedEffect at the very end: the sensitive ammo and propellant. That's what explodes. Also Abramses don't tend to actually explode due to in most cases carrying APFSDS ammo. If we were to load the Abrams with Russian HE-FRAG and HEAT rounds and hit it with a modern RPG, it'd explode and tear the tank apart, blow-out panels or not.

украинцы это там ,что за Днепром и то не всё

а вообще Харьков русский город

если дали им на производство т80уд ,это не значит что он украинский