Beautiful cards man .. most of them centered very nice!
@ilovehouse888Ай бұрын
Thank you and thanks for checking out the video.
@Red-mp3toАй бұрын
A "4" on that Joe Morgan is a joke. I went back, paused and scanned your card many times and I don't see any issues that would drop it to a "4". The only possibility is that there's dimples or something like that which can't be seen via your video. But even if that was the case, no way does it deserve a "4". Grading is absolutely a scam!! P.S. - made my comment before watching the entire video. You went on to mention that these cards don't have surface issues. That makes the grading even more of a joke AND a scam!
@ilovehouse888Ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment. I agree 100%. I looked at other 4’s and it’s not even close. The surface on it is solid. When it comes time to sell it I will sell it as a raw pack fresh card and crack it out or have it regraded. I don’t want to take losses just because the grader doesn’t know how to do their job. Thanks for watching.
@josephsmith7087Ай бұрын
Yes, yes it's a scam
@robdemare82502 ай бұрын
Answer to your question lies with the undetectable flaws not visible to the naked eye.
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
I believe you have a good point. At the same time, if it can’t be seen by the naked eye, should they really be marking the card down for that? It’s certainly debatable. Thanks for your comment and for checking out the video.
@pauliepacks2 ай бұрын
Great video! Love the cards. Eye appeal is fantastic despite the grades. With what everyone now knows about grading, we shouldn’t still be this far apart (submitters expectations vs grader’s subjectivity). Some companies are trying to offer more explanations behind their grades, which is what we need. but until the practice becomes universal, a lot of people will not trust the big Co’s (myself included).
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment and for watching. :)
@markpotash79862 ай бұрын
Who trims a '57 Mantle and leaves it that off-center?
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
Good point. I was wondering the same thing. I think it may be min size from the manufacturer or someone tried to trim it and failed miserably.
@vintagepsaandmore4732 ай бұрын
Man those cards look better than the grades…..
@frankcardinal772 ай бұрын
I'm not sure about grading. I think people put blind faith in all these companies. If you are getting things "professionally" graded they should have to justify the grades. Notes as to why the grade is the grade otherwise it's not "professional" I did not like where the hobby was going with grading over 25 years ago and I still don't like it. You all just blindly giving away your money to these companies who can arbitrarily say it's this grade without any justification.
@kuhlaid63052 ай бұрын
No more than modern trading cards are, especially with their nonstop and ridiculous parallels.
@user-fl6bp4bn2s2 ай бұрын
I spent a career in real estate appraisal where the object was to determine what the "fair market value" of a piece of real estate was. People in this profession have to actually pass a series of tests which licenses them to demonstrate that they understand the principles of valuation in an effort to prove what a piece of real estate would sell for to a "willing buyer". Card graders have no universally accepted test that they have to pass, and as a result, two different graders can assign radically different grades to a card depending upon their knowledge, experience, emotions and what they ate for breakfast on that day. In short, it is still the wild wild west out there where money is created and uncreated at the whim of someone who might be completely unqualified for the task of assigning a grade and hence the value of the collectible in question.
@SportsCardsetcetera2 ай бұрын
At times grading does appear to have an unsavory and sleazy aspect to it.
@user-ir8uu1ef6f2 ай бұрын
Your 1961 Clemente is worthy of an 8 ….1961 Mantle is definitely a 7 …it’s truly unjust when these grading companies dictate who gets the better grade
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching and for your comment. I agree 100%. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to be at a 7 or 8 for some of these vintage cards, especially the ones that are well centered and in excellent condition. After you have seen enough vintage cards you know how hard good ones are to find. Many have printing defects, are way off center, and certainly look their age. I was surprised to find some of these in such good condition but still received lower grades. It is what it is at this point.
@thetwotravelers5462 ай бұрын
I would be demanding a refund, the company you used has no idea how to grade. Those were some very nice cards.
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment and for watching. I appreciate it. Yeah, I may have to resend them someday for a second opinion and hope for more accurate results. Maybe I will send them when there is a trusted AI or technology based grader which will eliminate human error and subjectivity.
@user-fn8uc8ip5w2 ай бұрын
When grades come back good "I love grading! I'll keep doing it!". When grades come back bad "It's a scam".
@user-fn8uc8ip5w2 ай бұрын
Card has a crease "I expect an 8!". What are we doing lmao
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
You're missing the point. I want grades to be consistent and fair. I am not a fair weather grader. The VAST majority of the grades I have received have been low in my opinion. They are usually 1-2 grades lower than they should be. How many 63 Ray cards have you looked at? What do you know about that set and it's condition? Probably not much.
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
@@user-fn8uc8ip5w It got a 7.5. Why would an 8 be out of the question? It's not a crease as in a fold in the card. Maybe "extremely light bend" that can only be noticed in the right angle of light would be the best way to say it. In any case, for the 1963 set, the Ray is in extremely good condition. I challenge you to find a raw one in better condition.
@Mountainrock702 ай бұрын
Your Ray Nitschee is a prime example grading is bogus. I buy graded cards if the price is right, but I wont send any in for grading.
@jeremyarnold29332 ай бұрын
Are any of these for sale?
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
Not at the moment. I may list some on ebay in the future. Is there a particular one you are interested in? Thanks for watching.
@MrJmangini3 ай бұрын
I’ve been saying what are saying for years. The bigger question is why does an 8 sell for prices so ridiculously more than a 7 when we can’t tell the difference and when there is a possibility on a different day that 7 could get an 8 if resubmitted?
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
Excellent point! Thanks for watching.
@mcpw18183 ай бұрын
The Jenkins looks like it has chipping on the bottom edge, print marks on the grey box around the names, and a stain on the back left side. The Mays lower right corner is tipped. Grades make sense to me.
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
I respectfully disagree. If the Mays is worthy of a 7, then the Jenkins should be as well. Thanks for watching.
@Kenneth-nVA3 ай бұрын
Why do PSA 6 or 7’s sell way better than a SGC?
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
It’s primarily because PSA has been in the industry for a long time, are supposedly more trusted, and people like their slabs. Personally I think PSA is trash and is overrated. I won’t use them. Their graders are also very strict. They started off grading more fairly and maybe even too high in some cases and have turned a 180 and are now grading very harshly. That may be another reason for the high value in PsA because high grades are hard to get. They are a waste of money.
@Kenneth-nVA3 ай бұрын
I tend to view things in thirds. A 66 Mays as a 6-7 is equivalent to a modern day 9-10 in that, we simply didn’t care about the corners and centering back in the 60’s and 70’s as they did starting in the late 80’s! Finding uncirculated vintage cards are truly a rarity! For me, finding a 3-5 grade is 100% acceptable for my PC. Modern cards are different… anything less than an 8 I never touch! All my modern cards are 8 and up… that 65 Maris is a beautiful card
@vintageonvintage8173 ай бұрын
New subscriber, really enjoyed this video. I send a lot of cards to SGC ( my grader of choice) for the most part I think they are fairly consistent although, I do believe that grading companies have become a lot more stringent today than in years past. I have a Yaz RC that is min size from the factory that they won't give a number grade, think that needs to change, if they know that is how it was cut at the factory they should grade it accordingly.
@ilovehouse8882 ай бұрын
I agree 100%. If the grader knows it has not been tampered with, they should certainly grade it. Thanks for the sub and for watching.
@mantlecollector3 ай бұрын
I dunno about graded cards cuz its subject to one person opinion on what the card grade is. Just cuz one person at psa says the card is a 5 doesn't mean it's a 5. For all we know, the card could be a 4 or a 6. And it shouldn't matter who grades the card, the grade the card gets shouldn't change if it's in the same condition if u send it to psa or sgc or whoever. Just cuz one grading company has different ways to determine a grade that grade should always be the same. For example: 2+2 is always gonna equal 4. No matter who is doing the math 2+2=4. It doesn't change. Same way with grading cards. Unless for some reason the card condition changed like there's a new crease or a ding corner when there wasn't one before then and only then should the grade be different. People pay so much money when buying graded cards when that might not be the true grade of that card. If u sent that card to 5 different grading company and it came back the same grade then I can say that card is a 5.
@sfisportscards83233 ай бұрын
Awesome cards, love the selections. I've sent in to SGC about a dozen times or so, maybe have gotten Authentics 3x, which is fine. I don't sell so I've gotten passed being upset over getting an A if it still looks good. SGC has given me 8.5s on 60s and 70s cards but also some other head scratchers as well. Comes with the territory and something Im sure will never go away. Thanks for sharing!
@SEANGUS-xe9ib3 ай бұрын
Wish I would have thought of this SCAM years ago....
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
Hahahah. Yes. Looking at peoples cards and putting them in cheap plastic cases for a bunch of cash seems like a pretty sweet deal huh?
@lovetruth85493 ай бұрын
Grades seemed fair to me. Nothing out of the ordinary. Thought that 2nd year Morgan would be a 7.5. must of had a defect somewhere. Huge bump on the 63 🏈 rc
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
What's the highest vintage grade you have received? Also, I have looked at PSA grades for many of these cards including the 61 mantle. There are 8's that have chewed edges and much worse centering than mine. I definitely don't consider them fair grades. PSA and SGA both need to start having subgrades to explain themselves because I certainly am not seeing what they are seeing.
@lovetruth85493 ай бұрын
@@ilovehouse888 I'm familiar w/ sgc grades more than psa. Sgc almost never gives a card from the 50s or 60s a 9-10. It's worth a fortune when they do. An 8 or 8.5 is also an elite grade. Pretty rare imo
@raymoreci38473 ай бұрын
The charges are robbery! Why should they get a bigger chunk for a more valuable card, the work they put into each card is essentially the same. They are a rip off.
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
I agree 100%. The only justification I can see for a slight up charge is for the shipping liability to ship it back to the customer. If it is lost, stolen, or damaged on the way back, the grader would have to eat that cost. So I can see them charging just a little more for shipping insurance but it should not be that much unless you have a card worth 50,000 or more or something like that. Thanks for your comment and for checking out the video.
@robwallace8023 ай бұрын
Yes
@judiepitsos44643 ай бұрын
Centering, is 4th to check. Surface, corners, edges,,,, Centering.
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
Good to know. I think the corners, surfaces, and edges were on point too for many of these cards, especially for being 50-60 years old. Thanks for watching.
@richardbianco96743 ай бұрын
Plus the fact that sgc says they go off way more than just those 4. The one thing I will say is their standards have not changed since the beginning where as we all know psa had to get tougher the last few years
@robdemare82502 ай бұрын
Centering is the MOST IMPORTANT aspect of the card. That's why Beckett assigns the subgrades in order: (Centering, Corners, Edges, Surface)...most important to least important.
@richardbianco96742 ай бұрын
@@robdemare8250 that's just alphabetical. Each is weighted the same.
@VintageSportsCards19793 ай бұрын
They need to explain their grades in my opinion.
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
I agree. All graders should have subgrades. Thanks for checking out the video.
@DJSquish763 ай бұрын
Just wait till AI grades. Then we will get all the explanations we want. Those are great cards and always remember if it's too good to be true it probably is.
@peterleonardini2393 ай бұрын
Awesome lot of cards, you were definitely robbed on the 61 Mick!!
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
Thank you and thanks for watching.
@robertarnold71873 ай бұрын
I have a Jordan/Griffey Jr. Card that I opened from a pack. The card seems like it was trimned judging by the magnetic protector. The card is beautiful but if that causes a lower grade Im not sending it in. Is that common?
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
Having a min sized card is not too common but it does happen from time to time. You can see if your cards fit in the hard plastic case and if they fit snugly, then you should be good. You will also want to examine the centering, corners, and edges as well. The last thing to determine is how much value will grading add to your card since grading fees are usually $15-$20 per card plus you have to pay to ship it to and from the grader. If you believe the value is there and the quality of the card looks good, I would send it in. At the very least it will authenticate the card, encapsulate and protect it, and hopefully it will add lots of value to the card if it receives a high grade. Hope this helps. Thanks for watching.
@robertarnold71873 ай бұрын
@@ilovehouse888 Thanks very much for the advice. I opened the card myself and it's hard to find from what I've seen. Seems just a tiny bit smaller in a magnetic holder. Definitely nor a miniature though. I'll send it in and see what happens. Thanks again.
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
@@robertarnold7187 For sure. Good luck with it. I hope you get some high grades. I have had some cards where there was just a very little bit of space in the hard plastic case that still got graded. So the card does not have to fit exactly but it needs to be close. Sometimes you just have to roll the dice and see what happens, especially if there is a good chance of drastically increasing the value of the cards.
@robertarnold71873 ай бұрын
@@ilovehouse888 AMEN to that! I think I'll send it in as it's quite rare from what I can find. I'll let you know how it ends up. Thanks again.
@kennyshort90783 ай бұрын
Evidence of trimming on that 1957 Mantle!!! Ouch!! Imagine paying over 700.00 only to find out it's worthless.. 😢😢😢😢
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
Thankfully, the 57 Mantle is still worth $500 even if it's trimmed. But it's good to do your research and prevent it from happening in the first place.
@nyerc75083 ай бұрын
So-called blazers, 9's & 10's, from the 'vintage' era IMO generally come out of Topps 'presentation' sets. Presentation Sets were produced, carefully, and slowly, at the beginning of a print run, for inspection, and were distributed to 'friends, family and associates'.
@jamesb66863 ай бұрын
yup
@landanwoodard75693 ай бұрын
AI grading is the future. It removes the human element and prevents cracking and resubmitting. Every card is like a fingerprint and given a certification number.
@markyyaya2 ай бұрын
Yep! The people grading have more flaws than the cards (lol)
@ACD19943 ай бұрын
Question is how many vintage cards that do have a grade should have been ''authentic'' instead. I don't have much faith when it comes to PSA and SGC knowing the difference between a trimmed card and one that isn't.
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
That’s a good point. I can 100% guarantee there are vintage cards that got graded by PSA that were trimmed. They rattle around in their cases and don’t fit in them flush. Their sales can be seen on ebay sales history.
@ACD19943 ай бұрын
If you go on the SGC website they have descriptions for, each assigned grade. This is what it says for an SGC 6: 75/25 or better centering, slight fuzzing of corners may be evident, skewed cut may be more evident, focus or register may be off, and slight notching of edges may exist. It's hard to tell from watching the video which of your cards were under graded. Would have to see them in person. You do bring up some valid points though when it comes to the people looking over the cards. Don't know what their experience is when it comes to cards. How much training they had. The amount of time they have to grade a card given that they have so many to go through. It might not be until PSA and SGC have sophisticated AI assisted technology that they will be able to grade any card, and come as close as possible to being accurate. TAG Is one of the very few companies who are using the technology. Will be interesting to see if PSA/SGC buys them out and uses their tech to grade, and also spot cards that were either altered, or had been cracked out of a slab, and was already graded by someone else.
@HeavyLumber3 ай бұрын
How do you prep your cards? Do you use a loop? It’s not just centering that makes the grade. I guarantee the Bo Jackson has some type of ink spot on the surface that you can’t see.
@landanwoodard75693 ай бұрын
Cards weren't properly stored until the 80's. Also it was hard to pull 8's and 9's fresh from the pack. Printing and centering flaws galore and the edges would get shredded by dull blades during the cut.
@ACD19943 ай бұрын
My dad collected baseball cards in the 1960's and 1970's. Back when a lot of kids and teenagers weren't thinking these cards would have much value. This is before eBay. Before grading. So you are correct when you say it wasn't until sometime during the 1980's people started to realize there could be monetary value. Same with other trading card companies which would then lead to the junk wax era. But yeah. Honestly, most vintage cards will not grade super high unless they were altered in some way and PSA and SGC missed it. The reason why is due to centering issues, print lines, creases, etc. So yeah. I don't buy into the pop control when it comes to most cards. The experience, however, of graders and the training they get...that part would be interesting to know.
@user-jh8wy4cm3r3 ай бұрын
Yes grading is a scame iv been collecting for 35 years and the changes modern people are trying to make will come back to haunt yall
@user-jh8wy4cm3r2 ай бұрын
And if your a real collector u know how to authencate your own stuff
@chriscurry33833 ай бұрын
That last point you nailed. Eloquently put and I personally don’t think it’s a theory anymore. I absolutely believe it’s a tactic to keep the inventory coming in. With that said, it’s a tough situation we’ve all found ourselves in with vintage especially. Case in point, I’m scared most of the time buying raw vintage, especially more upscale because of the tampering that goes on. So what do I do? I buy a slab that at least authenticates my card…we suppose. But all good points man. Well thought out video and I’m with you.
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
Thank you. I appreciate the support. The current landscape does put vintage collectors in a weird position for sure.
@keithroller31313 ай бұрын
You could be possibly correct!! Some mighty fine cards! I’d buy them vintage cards all day long at them grades!
@Franco18033 ай бұрын
Amazing cards! Those sixes were strong. These companies are using magnification and blue lights looking for things the naked eye can’t see.
@notsure61832 ай бұрын
If the naked eye can't see it, why should it be of concern to the collector? Humans collect cards, not machines. To me it's just another way to make infinite grades and water down old numbers and create new ones, hence, keep people trying to achieve grades and constantly raising the bar and moving the goal posts.
@Mountainrock702 ай бұрын
@@notsure6183 exactly. If a card looks pleasing to my eyes it’s good to me.
@deanjackson6253 ай бұрын
Psa doesn't have enough quality graders at Psa and grading vintage baseball, basketball and football take longer. Since Psa buying sgc wonder if the system of gradings is changed , Psa gets over 2 million card's a month and most are morden prizm and rarely see vintage. Plus Psa doesn't trainee graders the same and no consistency.
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
For sure and their turn around times are ridiculous. Making people wait 4-6 months or longer for their cards back is insane.
@JenniferMedina-bg1zb3 ай бұрын
Grading is a scam. I made a video years ago and YT took it down. One of the big companies ratted me out. These big 3-4 companies have graders as young as 20 years old. That’s pathetic. And I’ve cracked several cards out that were 7-8’s and PSA has sent them back as low as 4. You can literally send the same card in 3 times and get 3 different grades. I know bc I’ve done it. It’s a scam and I no longer grade and I rarely pay up for high grade slabs.
@ACD19943 ай бұрын
PSA did not buy sgc. The company that owns PSA bought it. Collectors universe.
@ACD19943 ай бұрын
@@JenniferMedina-bg1zb Grading is just a subjective opinion. Until they have AI assisted technology that can accurately scan and process cards. Sort of like in baseball. They are experimenting with robo umpires, but hasn't happened yet in MLB. We're getting closer.
@corymcewen59433 ай бұрын
Yeah it is and this is why. These people grading cards are no more professionals than I am and each card is subjective to each person. What one may think is a 8 the next may think it's a 6! What actually makes these people think they are professionals to grade cards? ANYBODY can do that job. And I'd bet PSA has lord knows how many people doing it cause of millions of submissions. It's a joke
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
I agree 100%. Thanks for watching.
@kevindunn61243 ай бұрын
They are off centered on the back
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
Some are but other are pretty spot on. I don't believe the centering on the back holds as much weight as it does on the front. I have seen many 9's and 10's where the back centering is off. It may justify 0.5 or 1 grade lower unless it is really off center. I still don't think it justifies the grades I received. Thanks for watching and for your comment.
@JoeKyser3 ай бұрын
Scamming is a grade
@Bradydog-in7ut3 ай бұрын
May I ask how much an SHC “8” is worth?
@ilovehouse8883 ай бұрын
A 5 is worth about $40 and an 8 is worth about $180. So PSA essentially ripped me off by $140 on this card.
@Bradydog-in7ut3 ай бұрын
PSA has been shafting collectors since they put their “higher” grading standards. They hope you sell it to one of their “preferred “ customers who buy it off of you for a lower price, resubmit it then they get a PSA “9” on the card. The good news is that some of the grading companies, which I will not name, have become so crooked that The FBI now has a dedicated team looking into graded card fraud. If these companies keep it up, I believe in 5 to 10 years 4:16 The FBI will make them look so bad that ALL their graded cards won’t be worth a damb. You heard it here 1st…..
@danielbasso5863 ай бұрын
As a collector, I love 3's, 4's and 5's. I ran out of kidney's chasing 8's and 9's. You have some awesome cards with great centering.