Well hello there ...do you know how to use the Garmin Radios? Navigation frustrates me but I want to fly ils, rnav, etc.... from vancouver, bc canada

Do you have buy madere airport Because Mine is bugger

I bought and installed and I can not hear any sound. I am going to give a bad rating .

But does it handle exiting from controlled airspace? A majority of airspace in northern Western Australia is uncontrolled below FL180 or FL245, yet is still heavily used by commercial and charter aviation for mining work. ATC will generally clear aircraft to "leave controlled airspace descending" and after landing pilots are required to contact ATC once grounded to "cancel SARWATCH" (Search and Rescue in case of no contact). After departure from aerodromes uncontrolled airspace pilots need to provide a position report detailing takeoff time, present tracking and estimated time at their next waypoint. Can these kinds of programs handle it? How do they handle regional variations in ATC procedures?

Hi, 119 subs and climbing! You sound like another fella who does sims from Ireland...forgot his name..

At least in German I could guess at what a 'Steinbruch' was even if I'd never heard it before - which in fact I hadn't till this video. You couldn't do the same with the English 'quarry'.

Density altitude. A problem that simmers will never understand. Flying in Nepal in a Piper Cub with aspirated engine and few hp ? 😃😃🤣

Nice to see something different for a change in the MSFS community. These types of videos bring way more value, IMO, than 4 hour long streams some creators produce. Nice work.

I retract my last statement. I'm very sorry about that. I didn't realize that you can keep BATC forever, it's not a subscription. Sorry again, in fact I am saving up for it.

Thank you for this nice and wonder full (!) adventure! Exciting and spannend. Besides I could learn a lot more about the Cub, different to all the other tutorials I have seen so far. Makes große Lust to try it out myself!😊

Excellent presentation. Thanks

Never heard of Sonnen, will give it a try. Happy landings!

This plane just sparks joy! Piper Cub by Classic Aircraft Simulations CAS | MSFS2020 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pcp2krV7ndPFpKc.html

I liked the regional accents of sayagain and that it actually welcomed you to Berlin. Beyond felt like you were being yelled at by Americans that didn't understand your accent 😅

Beyond ATC is not really AI. They are using canned phrases like default ATC does. Say Intensions is real AI though.

Thank you so much! Great materials.

Thanks for this. Just FYI - BATC has trouble with 'niner'. 'Nine' always works. Not ideal, but better than constantly repeating yourself and then hitting the auto response.

had the same issue get computer to say it

While both AI-based air control systems are good, I really like VATSIM! However, as a newbie, it can be quite stressful the first time if you mess something up. I’ve never tried VATSIM before, and my only hesitation is because I’m still learning the whole ATC procedure.

Great video, but I'll stick with VATSIM. :)

WATCH NEXT: a comprehensive look at the state of AI ATC tools for MSFS 2020. Link: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gpNnlame0NjIe4U.html

The atc says negative because you saying "one two one nye nine eight" and he think you said 121.998!

sehr gut

very nice, only think the IA does not recognise the word "niner" for nine, it should be correct and it will be perfect

I found B-ATC to be crap!

2028 we might have a functioning ATC with live AI traffic

One thing I can see in advantage of AI ATC is pretty simple: On VATSIM there's always a chance that controllers go offline or airports don't have a controller once you approach them. I fly regional airports frequently, which tend to have this problem because controllers tend to gravitate to large international hubs.

I was hoping that BATC issue with requiring such exact responses was sorted (or at least better) by now. Will hold off on buying still. Its definitely the better option for my budget, I'm just not that heavily into flight sims to justify the cost of SI. I'm sure SI will be the better option for others who fly more. Particularly when doing flights with no vatsim, or similar, coverage at the time. There certainly should be room for both in the market.

Gotta love the small GA planes, they can be so much fun. Thanks for sharing.

very good job :-) thank you for your effort. That really give me a picture about it. Well done.

It'll be BeyondATC for me but not until traffic injection and VFR are available. They also need to accept the correct phonetic pronunciation for numbers. From other videos it seems that American ATC use the correct pronunciation (zero, wun, too, tree, fower, fife....niner) but American pilots have never been taught it.

Nice comparison! Im surprised there are not more videos including FSHud. It does at least as good as these and includes traffic. Just no voice recognition 😕 so I just pretend my PNF is doing all the coms.

"Niner" versteht Beyond ATC nicht, muss "Nine" sein, dann geht es

The AI products make clear errors and are just plain annoying in my opinion. Thank you for the comparison!

Really good and fair comparison, probably one of best I've seen. I purchased the supporters pack of BeyondATC and had the same issue of getting it to understand me as well as doing some really weird things on approach to some airports that got me completely lost. That said I think it's a great program indeed. I haven't tried SayIntentions. I'm tempted especially with the price drop and want to fly VFR again which I mostly do, but, and this is only based on me, I don't really fly enough to warrant the monthly fee. I think if you fly enough it would be well worth it though, so it just depends on what you do. I also find SayIntentions comparison page VERY misleading which puts me off them as al business. I would encourage them to focus on a meaningful comparison about the benefits rather than crappy statements like "If your ATC software is a one-time fee, it's not AI". Focus on the benefits in flight such as more natural conversation and ability to go "off piste" and get people back, supporting flight plan changes etc

Beyond ATC voice recognition has been much better than that, but in the last three weeks it has gotten much worse. I'm sure it will be fixed. I have both and with SayIntentions price reduction and the fact that you do not feel alone because of the multiplayer I would choose SayIntentions right now. The monthly payment could be a deal breaker for some. Beyond Atc is good and has alot of promise but it feels a little narrow in what you can say which is fine most times until something does not go as planned. SayIntentions deals with things that do not follow the script much better.

Since BATC and sayintension don't support traffic injection (yet) I will stay with FSHUD and FSLTL in combination. The voices are not as sexy and I don't use push to talk, but it works, and the injected traffic is pretty nice. Downside... FSLTL uses fr24 data, if the airport is empty in real life it's empty in the sim. If the AI programs evolve, I would go for BATC, since a monthly subscription is a no go to me.

BeyondATC doesn't like you saying "niner" even though it uses that pronunciation itself. "nine" works fine though. Its a well known bug they are working on

What is the thing with squawk 1000? Germany local procedure?

Watch this video next if you want to see a complete flight with the CAS Piper Cub: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r-CDZdeZutKyh4k.html

NEXT VIDEO: for an intriguing sound add-on for MSFS 2020: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/odKJeJlolpPZXac.html

Great video and comparison. I’m defo going to give Sayintentions a go and see how I go with it. Currently using BATC so gonna compare the both. Happy to pay for a subscription if it’s better.

Falls Du Interesse an etwas tiefgehenderen Informationen zu SI haben möchtest, sprich mich gerne auf den offiziellen Kanälen an. Speziell das Thema Taxi Instructions würde mich bei Dir wirklich mal interessieren, das kann eigentlich so nicht sein :)

good content! very informative

Thank you very much for this comparison! I am sure it was a lot of work! I like your style, subbed!

Beyond ATC experience is spot on. Exactly what I deal with

I wouldnt mind Vatsim, but had a bad experience on there with a controller. Also its very hit and miss where coverage is available.

All the beeps and tones with BATC is annoying. I switched to SI some weeks back, and much prefer it. They have also reduced cost to $20 per month

i recently got BATC, an while its often updated, the few flights ive done, it can get a bit confused vectoring, ive had it bring me in high/late a few times too. Still worth the money, and it is EA, so im not worried, the dev has a really good approach, very transparent (actually why i went with BATC), and much better than stock atc(which i persevered with for over 3000 hours). Can anyone tell me, IRL, would you tell the controller your ready to decend, or is this a limitation of a 3rd party software in sim?

I get the feeling SayIntentions doesn't care if you say things correctly, which means it also won't pick up on incorrect readbacks, whereas BeyondATC is very particular, but needs very specific phrasing. SayIntentions ends up feeling more streamlined because it gives you the illusion it just hears you correctly the first time, whereas BeyondATC is very frustrating when it gets stuck like it often does. I only have the latter myself, and it definitely needs more maturing to get rid of these points of frustration, bizarre instructions etc. Would be interesting to test SayIntentions just saying everything wrong to see how much it actually listens, and how much it simply injects what it expects. If I'm wrong and it actually verifies everything, then I am impressed.