9 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@mateuszmista738 Күн бұрын
Wow, thank you from the bottom of my heart :) I like those techniques. I just have one question, you have mentioned the way we should learn how to adjust our pitch in order to make a clim at particular v/s. But what about N1 adjustments during those manouvers? Best regards!
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 15 сағат бұрын
+@mateuszmista738 yes of course you need to keep N1 in your scan. For access to our full content on sim preparation, pls visit online.airlineselectionprogramme.com/course/sim-preparation-course
@Dogfight2000 16 күн бұрын
Ridiculous assessment. Too tough to fly low cost airline
@simpson.d3331 26 күн бұрын
bonjour ce serzit pour savoir quand est la prochaine session pour le programme air France cadets ?
@FromUpHigh Ай бұрын
thank you for explaining the major middle east airlines in such detail, but I have on question in particular and that is how can a Go Around go so wrong that the Pilot decides to leave the Airline. I was under the impression that there is a now Blame Culture when it comes to Go Arounds.
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 26 күн бұрын
Still in his case management actually offered either a return to the RHS or a mutually agreed exit. The reality is that he had an average sim a few months prior which can happen to anyone. And there they put the pressure on him, probably in an excessive way, such that he felt his job was on the line every time he went to work. That’s not ok. This sort of pressure can have the effect of a loss of confidence and sadly that’s what I think happened. Nothing is worse for a pilot than to lose your confidence. BA would have retrained this person with the goal of rebuilding his confidence. I’m sure AF would have too. After that indeed and sadly the Go Around was really not well flown.
@FlyingMikeProject Ай бұрын
What a fantastic video Guillaume! Your invaluable insights of the whole interview process has taught me so much! I really liked the amount of information you made freely available on your website and KZfaq. I was highly impressed and look forward to completing the Advanced Interview Course in a few weeks time. Thank you for sharing this with us, it is greatly appreciated. I plan on preparing as much as I can to be successful and earn a cadetship in Ireland 🇮🇪
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 26 күн бұрын
Thank you much appreciated! 😍
@guraytanc9732 Ай бұрын
I dont think Ryanair and Wizzair will consider a candidate to be hired again if he quit himself. At least thats what Ive heard.
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 26 күн бұрын
Actually they do. If you gave them 8 years of service and come back after 3 because you wanted to see long haul… you gave them a lot and were a good employee, and just want to come back… I’ve heard of very many being rehired.
@hayatkaabeche203 Ай бұрын
Ils prennent que les ingénieurs en aéronautique les autres ils passent le test psy2 et ils reçoivent un mail qu'ils sont pas pris donc les études gratuites sont prises en charge par les pauvres étudiants
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Ай бұрын
Il n’y a absolument pas besoin d’être ingénieur pour passer les Psy1. Ni les Psy2.
@SuraiyoKudratullayeva Ай бұрын
wonderful video, thank you very much!
@LACSACR Ай бұрын
What do you think about the majority of European airlines that obligate the pilot to pay for his own type rating compared to the rest of the world?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Ай бұрын
+@LACSACR it’s been like this for a while now. Best accept it, get a type rating and start earning a wage. Pilots pay a lot for their education. But if you put it in perspective it lasts only for 3 years. Compare that to being wage less for 8 years as a student doctor. Or paying yourself through college in the US. Do I agree with it, no. But in my case if I hadn’t done it I’d not have hard the career I had. Also some low cost airlines invest back in you and give you exceptional training. Seen this way and considering you can be a captain at 25… and that your salary will only go up from there, the deal is not bad actually.
@SuraiyoKudratullayeva Ай бұрын
@@airlineselectionprogramme3156 first of all thank you for the video! Mostly I agree with you in the perspective comparing to the doctors education. However airlines may suggest investments in your Type Rating and having contract for 5 years in return only if you are EU citizen. What about immigrants who have EASA license and nearly 0 opportunities to get hired by airlines?
@petersjeanpaul9071 Ай бұрын
@LACSACR The practice may seem disgusting at first sight, but it does make financial sense for the airline. Just imagine if Ryanair financed the TR for all the new pilots hired by the airline, what do you think would happen ? All pilots would receive TR + excellent training but would most probably leave the company as soon as they can for a better paying airline and that's precisely what the company does not want, to invest in people that will leave at the first opportunity. That's why the airline require 30,000€ to be paid upfront for the TR. They want the candidates to see their entry at the airline as a long term investment. Major airlines still finance TR with bond because they know pilots will most certainly stay on the long term, so financing it for the candidate makes sense
@LACSACR Ай бұрын
@@petersjeanpaul9071 Ryanair could demand a bonding time and retain the human talent. Like the rest of the World 🤷🏼♂️
@petersjeanpaul9071 Ай бұрын
@@LACSACRbut how do you retain talent ? Higher salary is the main lever for it, but that's the point of a low cost airline, to save on salaries too...
@LACSACR Ай бұрын
54:10 Hello. Do you think it makes sence to fly to the station (from wherever you are) and then fly radial 130 outbound for 15nm, then a procedure turn to intercept radial 310 or the ILS?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Ай бұрын
+@LACSACR yes. Just a lot more complicated. And therefore a lot more stress and opportunity to destabilise your flying.
@mustafaasir8573 Ай бұрын
Dear my Capt. Salutes from Istanbul and Hungary skies. Through end of video I learnt and got notes a lot that cant found. As a type rated I learnt also that during Sim before Vr occurring the engine failure. Be careful to Airbus Philology, Eicas pages reading, check items, failure type as fire or damaged. Also secondary failure from Eicas pages clearing due to failure engine. Same again climb or descent via given rate, directing to point mostly to aid for interception, right left turns. After Ils approach vectored by Atc in dark and reduced visibility condition. The last surprise is evacuation on the runway...
@Rushu770 Ай бұрын
Nice
@user-oh2jl5wt4t Ай бұрын
well done.
@isuframadani1635 Ай бұрын
Any tips how to pass their caddet academy assement for people with 0 experience in flying?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Ай бұрын
Yes we just had a student of ours pass. He got our courses, worked them hard for months and will start the Wizzair Pilot Academy very soon now.
@LaraBazzaro 2 ай бұрын
Je vous propose de vous renseigner sur la nouvelle législation ESASA (germanwings) et le TD12 : attention à la confusion. Les inventaires de personnalités ne sont PAS obligatoires c'est l'évaluation psychologique (qui peut se faire sans test). L'entretien de groupe n'est PAS éliminatoire : il donne des éléments qui seront ou non validés en entretien individuel. Dommage car il y a des choses plutôt intéressantes.
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Ай бұрын
Le Sosie fait partie intégrante des Psy2. Comme notre objectif est de vous aider à réussir vos sélections c’est l’utilisation que l’on peut faire un tel outil à des fins de préparation qui est important. Oui nous connaissons la réglementation EASA mais au final cela ne change rien à la façon de se préparer.
@LaraBazzaro 2 ай бұрын
Attention il y a beaucoup d'erreurs dans cette vidéo : L'entretien de groupe n'est pas éliminatoire (40/60) il donne des éléments qui seront ou pas valider en entretien individuel ! Le TD12 est un inventaire à titre indicatif c'est le SOSIE qui compte. Le TD12 n'est PAS obligatoire selon la législation : c'est l'évaluation psychologique qui est obligatoire. Toutes les compagnies n'utilisent pas d'inventaire de personnalité. C'est dommage il y a des choses intéressantes et plutôt bons conseils
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Ай бұрын
AF n’élimine pas directement à l’entretien de groupe comme chez Wizzair mais il est très important si bien qu’une piètre performance sera difficilement récupérable. Sans être éliminatoire en soi au final elle y contribuera grandement. Si la matrice de notation fait ressortir un score inférieur au minimum requis sur une épreuve, cette épreuve provoque l'échec du candidat. Il est donc possible qu'un entretien de groupe à lui seul soit la cause d'un échec. Ce n'était pas le cas chez Emiratss où l'entretien de groupe était systématiquement noté de manière neutre afin de ne pas teinter le reste de la matrice. Sauf exception. Candidat qui perd son sang froid etc. Là on pouvait mettre une note qui allait faire échouer ce candidat. Qui de toute façon n'allait pas réussir l'entretien individuel non plus.
@jDoctorJones 2 ай бұрын
Un grand merci pour toutes ces informations qui nous reboostent en nous donnent envie de se présenter à la sélection dans un bon état d'esprit !
@Dragonred88 2 ай бұрын
can i run away with my america ATP and not pay my flight school loans back in america lol ?
@geraldcharbonier6313 2 ай бұрын
Tout ça pour être la compagnie européenne qui détient le plus grand nombre de crashs aériens et le plus grand nombre de passagers tués ces 25 dernières années 🛫☠️👍🏻
@Anas-ij8qf 2 ай бұрын
Merci
@aladin_7374 2 ай бұрын
Nice video and interesting subject ! Isn’t waiting for the upgrade in a low cost airline in Europe, then 3-4 years as captain to get some PIC hours then going to the middle east more challenging/harder? Because assessment is more demanding towards DEC and not always open towards narrow body captains OR because lets say you accept to apply for FO position; you will have to accept the downgrade (CPT back to FO) and accept a decrease in salary compared to previous position as cpt and be at the bottom of the seniority list. And also because while you may not have a big family when starting your carrier, as time goes by you start to build up a family which makes it even harder to move to ME.. In my opinion in terms of carrier progression and financial management it is wiser and easier to move there early than to wait until the family gets bigger or more difficult to move because you are well established into your home country. In terms of risk management, specially when already having a family or well established into a country it is probably better to secure a Captain position and experience in Europe for 3-4yr then « try » as FO for 2-3 years the middle east as you mentioned. But going FO and waiting until the upgrade in ME again will make you loose those 3-4 years spent as cpt in a lowcost that you could have spent in long haul.. but these years they could also save you if you want to come back to Europe as cpt.. again back to risk management but it depends with which mindset you go with. On top of what you mentioned, going to the ME seems to depend a lot on the individual profile and mindset (single? girlfriend? engaged? married? how many kids? how old? Just wanna try the long haul xp or want to build a long term carrier?) if the person commutes or not ( commuting imo is not ideal for many reasons..) Is the wife/husband willing to work in ME or not, and the personality because some personalities don’t match with the local arab-islamic culture. And the climate is not for everyone too (hot and humid, dusty sometimes) Going there should be a commitment from both in the couple otherwise it is hard to spend more than couple of years with out damaging our personal life and finance. In all cases, someone willing to go to ME should ask him/her self: What to do if I don’t like it as soon as I arrive? In 1 year? In 3 years? (Plan B) What to do after 10 years? 20 years? 30 years? (Retirement plan, side hustle, where to live..)
@cristianepaula2524 2 ай бұрын
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@BuddySpike23 3 ай бұрын
Hi thanks for this video because i am worried about an interview question did i ever have accident or incident, and the fact is i did have forced landing incident and it was pure mechanical issue and literally saved the plane and my passanger. Im just confused how i should answer about this question in the interview
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
That’s not a problem in my view. Come and talk about it on discord discord.gg/KrCCUFThq5
@BuddySpike23 3 ай бұрын
@@airlineselectionprogramme3156 awesome I will do that
@olgaaftenii1040 3 ай бұрын
Never been appreciated for being honest ! 🤐
@Iamaware111 3 ай бұрын
Thank you very much Captain for this wonderful video. I’m an ex-QR pilot, everything you mentioned is on point. Just to get your opinion, I was let go at 1000 hours. Will it be okay to join Emirates at 2000 hours as FO, single, with lots of flying school training debts to pay, and I have a plan B which is to return to my home country (in case things don’t go as planned). I will prepare the license of my country in case I need to return n I’m willing to return as a FO (worst case scenario). At 2000 hours, I will anyway have to wait 3-4 years for upgrade. Maybe if join Emirates at low hours, I could anticipate an upgrade in 6 years, an extra of 2 years. If everything goes well, in that 6 years I would have saved enough money n be marketable due to my experience. It a gamble n if I don’t make it to 6 years, I’m willing to return home on the right seat. What is your opinion on this plan?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
Hi there. That’s a long question and I’m missing a key point. What license and passport do you hold ? Come and talk about it on Discord discord.gg/KrCCUFThq5
@Slavking03 3 ай бұрын
Very nice video! Which countries in Europe and Asia would you recommend going to if you don’t want to be scared of losing your job because of a small mistake you made on your flight?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
Any coutries where unions exist and labor laws are consistent
@loukalachambre7972 3 ай бұрын
J’imagine que c’est donc la même chose pour les Compagnies asiatiques comme SingapourAirline
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
In Asia, in general, things are far worse for expats, particularly in China where some airlines have very high packages. Then... if you do a hard landing you'll be banned from flying for xxx weeks. Without pay. Things like that. There are many more issues in these countries and I would not recommend going there as a copilot ever. Of course, each case needs to be examined on its own merits and every country is different. Korea and Japan, when taking in expats, treat them well and fairly. There are pilot unions in these countries. In Singapore, expats report good conditions, but living expenses being astronomical plus local preference means a full career isn't possible there. In Indonesia things get worse. You'll never upgrade as an expat and will be left with the captain speaking the local language with the engineer and crew, and you having no idea of what's going on. Not a way to start your career. Going to Asia would be fine I'd say, as a longhaul TRE because then, they need you so desperately that the scales are reversed and in any case, as a TRE, you can very easily switch to another airline. Again, protect your career from the beginning and really, if you've got an EASA licence, try and get that first job in Europe. The no1 thing that matters for that first job is the quality of the training you'll receive, and which will shape you as a pilot.
@guillaumeleneen7797 3 ай бұрын
thank you for putting so much detail and honesty in your video ! I was seeing the middle east as a kind of "cheat code" place with no taxes and quick upgrades but this puts a lot of light on the risk and that it"s not all great. Thanks !
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
I'm glad this helps. Wished I'd seen my own video 10 years ago haha. I think if you go there for 3 years at some point, when your career is not fragile (you're fragile when you need to upgrade) and stay there 3 years, you'll probably get a lot out of it. The ideal path in my mind (Apart from entering a legacy carrier right away) : Low Cost in Europe 4y copilot 4y captain, then... 3 y middle east to have a look and do longhaul. Then decide: do I prefer to be a shorthaul captain back home or do my LH upgrade. Many will go back home, become TRIs TREs, and have a really good time coming back with all they learned in the middle east.
@tomdalton8451 3 ай бұрын
Thank you for your honest feedback
@mamadoushako2-pc6kb 3 ай бұрын
Quesqui faut pour postuler au cadet air france
@geraldcharbonier6313 2 ай бұрын
Avoir fait Bac S mention très bien avec félicitations du jury, Math sup, Math spé, prépa, hypokhâgne, khâgne, avoir un titre d’ingénieur, s’appeler Thomas Pesquet, avoir été dans l’espace 2 fois minumum, avoir 5 bras, 3 jambes et avoir moins de 20 ans.
@gregorydides4523 3 ай бұрын
Super vidéo ! Comment pouvons nous télécharger la fiche de culture générale ?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
Bonjour, il faut aller sur Air France partie 1 :-) online.airlineselectionprogramme.com/course/selection-pilote-air-france
@DonMrLenny 3 ай бұрын
Finally a clear instructive webinar that puts things into an organized shape instead of relying on "rumors and theories" Well said and done 👏🏼
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙏🏻
@petersjeanpaul9071 3 ай бұрын
You often mention AF as an example but I think it must be remembered that joining AF is almost a miracle and a pinch of chance is necessary too... their waiting list amounts to roughly 2,000 fully qualified pilots and demand from pilots to join the airline is simply staggering... of course AF recruitment can afford itself to be picky and discard candidates on such a dumb basis... I truly believe not all airlines are as picky as AF
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
Hi Jean Paul, nice to see you again. Actually they're not that demanding. The interview is in one language, of which everyone is a native. No sim check except in some cases. The selection is very well known, stable and easy to anticipate. Success rates at AF are similar to that of other major airlines and the waiting list you mention doesn't seem that high to me, but we'd need to confirm this figure. So I don't think AF are that picky. They are looking for the same sound behaviours in a pilot as other airlines with a few specificities as you'd expect. Yes major airlines can afford to be picky as you'd expect, but only to a point if they want to staff their airplanes fast enough. People with a type rating are being invited within 3 to 6 months at the moment which is remarkably fast. It was 3 years in my days... the important thing is to prepare the best you can, as that's the only thing you can really control.
@petersjeanpaul9071 3 ай бұрын
@@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Yep when you applied it must have been different. Thanks for the info! 👍
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
I made a mistake then. A mistake that could cost anyone their selection today. And it was a month when almost no one got hired which didn’t help.
@Kmtoo 4 ай бұрын
Bonjour, vous pouvez faire une vidéo avec le programme cadre Emirate comme dans cette vidéo svp?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 3 ай бұрын
Bonjour, il n'y aura pas de vidéo sur Emirates, cela dit toutes les techniques nécessaires pour réussir sont dans : online.airlineselectionprogramme.com/course/advanced-interview-course
@masterpc4836 4 ай бұрын
excellent content ！ a whole new view and much insight view!
@petersjeanpaul9071 5 ай бұрын
Self-sponsored type-rating is very debatable... Almost every aviation professional (including pilots, chief pilots, flight schools, airline HRs) I've met, recommended me NOT to undertake a self-sponsored type-rating for multiple reasons... This needs careful consideration, and the rightness of doing it depends hugely on the candidate his/herself. The first bet to consider is to not do it on your own, but prepare carefully for airline selections that deal with TR for you, with this regard using ASP is a good investment
@FromUpHigh Ай бұрын
@@airlineselectionprogramme3156 I have a follow up question to your Answer at what Age do you think is getting a Airline Job difficult during these times ?
@aredeleon7117 5 ай бұрын
Hola, , Tego una duda, si alguien me puede ayudar, me gustaría saber, el ceñorn thompson scott, trabajo o si aun trabaja en esa aerolínea
@tharakalahiru3029 5 ай бұрын
I would love to see a video like this about Wizzair!
@deryap9380 5 ай бұрын
Thanks for your great video! How should we answer 'Do you take risk?' in a pilot interview, should pilots take risk or not? Could you explain this question, please.
@deryap9380 5 ай бұрын
@@airlineselectionprogramme3156 Thank u so much
@cg.2214 5 ай бұрын
Merci pour cette vidéo somme toute intéressante. Il aurait été intéressant de creuser un peu plus l'origine de l'écart entre le résultat d'AF-KLM et celui d'IAG. En regardant rapidement, la ligne employees costs semble à elle seule expliquer la différence de net profit : - Un chiffre d'affaires quasi similaire à 2% près - Une masse salariale de 29% du CA pour AF-KLM contre 18% pour IAG (8 650m€ vs. 5 423m€) - Et donc 3.3mds € de différence et 11 points de marge ==> On pourrait soupçonner un business modèle différent (intégration vs. sous-traitance) mais le montant des charges externes est quasi égal (18mds€ dans les deux cas) et les effectifs sont également comparables : 77 800 employés pour AFKLM contre 70 000 pour IAG. On a donc des revenus supérieurs chez AFKLM en comparaison avec IAG : un salaire brut hors charge moyen de 76k€ chez AFKLM contre 53k€ chez IAG. C'est peut être là la conclusion la plus importante pour de futurs candidats...
@cg.2214 5 ай бұрын
Je n’ai pas dit qu’elle était trop importante, juste plus élevée que chez IAG. N’est-ce pas une bonne nouvelle pour des candidats pilotes Air France que de savoir que l’entreprise rémunère mieux ses salariés que les concurrents ? Vous mentionnez d’ailleurs Transavia : sauf erreur il s’agit de la seule low cost avec des pilotes d’une major aux commande (avec le contrat qui va avec).
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 5 ай бұрын
Tu as raison. Et on ne peut pas tout avoir, une société qui paie ses employés plus cher que ses concurrents, et une entreprise profitable... C'est une bonne nouvelle pour les employés, sauf si cela se dégrade fortement. ll n'y a pas que le risque que cela fait courir sur l'emploi, il y aussi la capacité d'investissement et de renouvellement qui est impactée.
@freddytaleb1068 5 ай бұрын
quels sont vos tarifs ??
@arslanaetikhar701 6 ай бұрын
J’ai passer l’ENAC, mais j’ai échouer. Maintenant, je suis chez ASTONFLY. Dois je dire, lors d’un entretien que j’ai échouer à l’ENAC?
@mojo7618 7 ай бұрын
Would getting an A320 type rating increase my chances astronomically or do they prefer to type rate me if all I have is a CPL/Frozen ATPL and few hundred hours of instructing ?
@mojo7618 6 ай бұрын
@@airlineselectionprogramme3156 done
@argi_dem 6 ай бұрын
@@Bryanzebox thank you
@theegg-viator4707 22 күн бұрын
@@airlineselectionprogramme3156 And this is the reason EU pilots are paid poor wages…. DO NOT pay for a type rating… That cost is a COST that the company needs to pay for because it is a cost of doing business.. The race to the bottom in the EU begins with SELF SPONSORED TYPE RATINGS. Stop “paying the company” to work for them.
@Alain.Helstroffer01 7 ай бұрын
Un concept qui manque énormément dans le monde de la Justice, hélas !!!
@user-zb1rt4zb7d 7 ай бұрын
Perfect!
@oliviab4404 8 ай бұрын
On pourrait avoir le lien du groupe discord svp?
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 8 ай бұрын
Bonsoir Olivia: discord.gg/KrCCUFThq5 Bonne continuation
@charlylesuedois4129 8 ай бұрын
Très intéressant merci beaucoup
@Falien8 8 ай бұрын
Merci beaucoup pour votre travail et votre partage. Je me prépare aux sélections de Swiss et vos vidéos me parlent beaucoup 🙏
@airlineselectionprogramme3156 8 ай бұрын
+@Falien8 merci bcp. Tu sais quoi faire pour passer à la vitesse supérieure. AIC marche très bien pour Swiss et Edelweiss.