Thank you! So the cute UI at the beginning was done by using the sounds made with the template until 7:50. If you have Ableton you can probably load up random collision/tension presets that are included with the DAW and fine-tune them to your liking. Just this will already make 60% of the work. If you want to have a bubblier feeling to it you can probably feature 2 of the 5 (or if you have more instruments, 40% of them) instruments for making bubbly sounds. I'd suggest to have 1 to make a single low bubble sound, in order to cover the low end part, while the 2nd instrument could cover higher bubbles. Let me know if it was clear and if you ended up with cool results!

@@christiandervishi thank you very much! That's very helpful. Sorry I got mislead as you probably picked the very best in the demo, but this process involves a lot of trial and error I guess. I'm gonna experiment with collision and tension, I really tend to overlook those 2 devices. :)

@@jamesmeustache7740 funny enough that was my first try and in general it never really took me more than what I said in the video to setup the whole template. I think it's just a matter of creating the right instrument fully flexible and once you have that it's easily gonna work. Good luck!

Thank you so much, I'll try to show the process of that too! Great pic in Vinicunca btw 😉

@@christiandervishi Thanks Cris!!!

I agree that it's so overused nowadays, but I feel like it's still a cool sound when it works. I see it being used everywhere on videogames where, personally, I like it mostly on sci-fi/gorey stuff, cause the liquid part is justified enough to me. But I didn't really feel like I used it so much in this video, did I? At what minute you feel like it's too prominent? Thank you btw for the feedback, always helps me a lot! ❤

Sadly not one I'm aware of. Even tho, if you have Ableton you can use the M4L device called Shaper and map it to the Volume Gain, so you're able to control the envelope of 1 channel. You duplicate this 4 times for 4 different channel tracks. Then what you can do is randomize the duration of the Shaper, so each time you press play it randomizes slightly the duration of each tracks and you have a similar result. You can map Shaper to each parameter you want (pitch, for example) and you're gonna end up with something that KIIIIIINDA sounds similar to Whoosh, with built-in randomization as well :) Please tell me if I was clear enough ahah

@@christiandervishithanks man! i was shocked to see the price for whoosh.. reaktor ensemble that costs 100 dollar? crazy😂

Doppler Dome by Aegean Music is free and has a similar effect to this, but much simpler. Still fun to stack them and get weird results

@@OrrinKeep Yoooo need to try this asap. Tysm Orrin! Soon enough I'm making a video where I quickly showcase all my favs creative free plugin, will definetely try this one and mention you (unless you wanna collab... 👀)

@@christiandervishi coincidentally I had plans to make a video about free plugins but I scrapped it because I didn't have time- I'm always down to collab tho, hit my email/Airwiggles if you want👀

Grazie mille davvero! In questo video mi sono limitato ai parametri principali ma sicuramente può essere decisamente approfondito. Sinceramente non mi considero il massimo esperto di questo plug-in, anche perché per esempio la parte dell'impact l'ho sempre disabilitata già dal primo momento e non l'ho mai approfondita. Probabilmente in futuro lo riuserò per un video, anche perché di base lo uso molto spesso, però diciamo che ora come ora non uso il plug-in al 100% perché per come mi piace lavorare preferisco avere tutti i processi il più possibile separati in maniera modulare, e una volta che ho ricavato quello che voglio da Whoosh (avere un determinato inviluppo usando i parametri mostrati nel video e una randomizzazione dei sample) il resto lo faccio con tool esterni, tipo post-processing, layering o editing, nonostante il plug-in offra alcuni di questi tool internamente. Spero di essermi spiegato ahah

In a future video I'm gonna be working exclusively with free VST so that they work in any DAW (and it will include TugSpect for sure!). Tysm!

During sound design and source creation sessions I like to stack plugins because they add artifacts and give more "texture", so it can be molded more. I also love resampling stuff through the same chain over and over, it really gives crazy results! But yeah, during editing I also use almost no plugins

It's a very cool plugin called MiniMeters (10€), here's a link to it: minimeters.app/

@@christiandervishi thanks you so much, I swear I searched it for 3months 🙏

On the link provided in the description there is the code. If you go for adding an FX, right click on the JS, Create new JS FX..., then click the Edit... button and you paste the code you found on the Forum there. It should work!

@@christiandervishi Thanks for the reply; i did that and pasted the code in my JS effect, I end up with different parameters than yours (i get a bunch of sliders saying "random value C8" to F8 and a trigger note on/off while you just have a number of midi output. Should i be editing the code? when i play my "melody", no sound gets to my instruments with that JS plugin active. Again, thanks for your time, super appreciated.

What really helped me when I was starting out (I'm still a big noob, nowhere near a good synthesis level) was to load cool presets that I liked, see how they were made and dissect them. How each Env/LFO/Osc/FX is affecting the final outcome and understand how to reuse them to achieve that specific result you have in mind is the biggest game changer (to me at least). Hope it helps a bit!

@@christiandervishithank you :] definitely agree, totally the way when learning synthesis. wish more synths included fx presets like phaseplant! also is there any processing you find yourself coming back to? I've had some luck with granular and spectral stuff in the past but I'm sure there are more esoteric things for ui design.

@@ytensor2196 I really really love spectral stuff, but I now tend to use it only at the beginning of the chain so that it's gonna be super processed after and you won't really hear the spectral artifacts. I almost stopped using granular stuff except for argotlunar to shape a bit the audio (I used it in my Mattia Cellotto Breakdown video) or Phase Plant granular synth but again, just like spectral stuff, it's at the beginning of the chain and since it's followed by many others FX you won't hear the classic granular sounds

Same. I ended up buying the $99 Ableton just for sound design and the features FL is lacking in. If you have the expendable funds for it, I greatly suggest it. But I know $99 can be quite a chunk.

fl can do this too but its just a bit different setting it up

FL Studio has some great tools tho (Harmor, Patcher, Sakura, ...)

@@christiandervishi toxic biohazard is one of my fav :)

Sorry but I forgot about it ahah, just added!

It's called Janne 2016, but I edited a bit. Text me on Discord and I can dm it to you. @christiandervishi

Thanks! Yeah sometimes you start a new project and everything sounds so meh, but if you commit to the initial idea and start to add more things and process stuff in a specific direction, things start to make more and more sense. At least in my experience ahah

You can get similar results with Multiband Compressor and Spectral Compressor. It may be hard to replicate because Uberloud has a very distinct sound, but the idea behind it is just Multiband Compressor on crack. So by playing around with these devices you can achieve something similar!

@@christiandervishi ok thanks, im so excited to replicate this, I absolutely love these sounds, especially the one you used in the intro

I covered it briefly on Twitter, you can check it out here: x.com/cdervishiaudio/status/1790552596450541639

I covered it briefly on Twitter, you can check it out here: x.com/cdervishiaudio/status/1790552596450541639 If you have any questions, I'm here!

I will, thanks. Sounds huge!

It's a cool software called MiniMeters, it's like 10€ and it works even outside the DAW. I'm glad you liked the video :)

I think I still have the project somewhere, maybe I will post it on Twitter considering how short the video might be ahahah. I'm glad you liked it❤️

​@@christiandervishi That'd be awesome, thanks for sharing

@@josephlandman1402 I covered it briefly on Twitter, you can check it out here: x.com/cdervishiaudio/status/1790552596450541639 I couldn't find the project because it was a pretty old project, but if you have any questions, I'm here!

i’d definitly watch a “how to” for the granular sounds!! they sound awesome

Thank you so much!