Unfortunately, you are correct. You may listen to the audio with the link provided in the description of the video. So sorry!

+Patrick Malone Thanks for the question, Patrick! Here is a quotation I found from The Bondage of the Will: Let us take it that there are three lights-the light of nature, the light of grace, and the light of glory, to use the common and valid distinction. By the light of nature it is an insoluble problem how it can be just that a good man should suffer and a bad man prosper; but this problem is solved by the light of grace. By the light of grace it is an insoluble problem how God can damn one who is unable by any power of his own to do anything but sin and be guilty. Here both the light of nature and the light of grace tell us that it is not the fault of the unhappy man, but of an unjust God; for they cannot judge otherwise of a God who crowns one ungodly man freely and apart from merits, yet damns another who may well be less, or at least not more, ungodly. But the light of glory tells us differently, and it will show us hereafter that the God whose judgment here is one of incomprehensible righteousness is a God of most perfect and manifest righteousness. In the meantime, we can only believe this, being admonished and confirmed by the example of the light of grace, which performs a similar miracle in relation to the light of nature. (In "Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation," ed. Rupp and Watson, 331-32) This is one quote, but it also seems to me that this kind of thinking is found throughout "The Bondage of the Will," where Luther reveals himself to be a very strong predestinarian.