Childhood dream destroyed

tell me im wrong :)

i have a theory that can change or explain common knowledge about "Earth". It is called "The Atomic Liquid theory". The name is not finalized. I am not hard to find.

Nothing from nothing leaves nothing. You got to have some thing, if you want to be with me. - Billy Preston (1974)

We simply must get the vacuum energy part moving, for when one examines all the options, it is the only option that will work in time. We already know that the Maxwell-Heaviside equations, prior to Lorentz regauging, do include open systems in disequilibrium in their vacuum exchange. We are also already aware that the present classical EM model completely omits the vacuum interaction (much less any broken symmetry in that interaction!), which we also know is a gross non sequitur since the vacuum interaction (and the dipole's broken symmetry in it) have been well-known in particle physics since the 1950s. The major problem in the U.S. is that the decision scientists at top positions advising leaders/secretary/vice-President/presidents, usually do not know anything but U(1) electrodynamics, and the advice they get from additional "expert" scientific consultants or advisers is inferior in that these "expert advisers" also seem to know only U(1) and also only the Lorentz-regauged Maxwell-Heaviside equations. Many (most) do not even "believe" in the active vacuum, or if they begrudgingly admit it, they think it is of absolutely no consequence. And they simply do not believe the tremendous energy density of the vacuum, nor will they accept it, even though it is good physics and has been for decades. Hence the entire scientific energy structure and infrastructure in the United States is fearsomely welded to a small fragment (subset) of James Clerk Maxwell's theory, and even to just a Lorentz regauged subset of the severe Heaviside truncation of it! We have a scientific mindset problem of epic proportion. In short, the energy crisis is completely the fault of our own scientific community. It is NOT the fault of the President, the Vice President, or the Secretary of Energy! It is the direct fault of the inferior advice being given them by the NSF, NAS, etc. The sad thing is that the U.S. scientific community is seemingly no longer capable of even evaluating its own U(1) EM model, as it has become almost an iron dogma. E.g., in the 1880s Oliver Heaviside discovered the enormous energy pouring out of the terminals of any generator -- vastly more energy than we provide as mechanical energy input to the shaft. John Henry Poynting in 1884, of course, only dealt from the beginning with the tiny component of that energy outpour that is intercepted by the external circuit and caught and used. Hendrik Antoon Lorentz understood both the Poynting component and the Heaviside component as well. But no one could explain what could possibly be the source of such an enormous energy flow from EVERY GENERATOR, BATTERY, AND SOURCE DIPOLE. That is rigorous. Simply check Heaviside's original papers. Anyway, Lorentz in 1892 then took the attitude that this enormous Heaviside energy flow component, missing the circuit entirely and just wasted, had "no physical significance" (his words). So he arbitrarily discarded it (not from NATURE, but from MATHEMATICAL ACCOUNTING) by a clever little integration trick, still used by all the electrodynamicists and those energy scientists designing and building our electrical power systems, writing our textbooks, teaching in our universities -- and advising Presidents, Vice-Presidents, and Secretaries of Energy. In short, we most often face scientists who literally will not believe and cannot comprehend that every generator we ever built, already extracts enormous energy from the vacuum. It is quite easy to prove it, for peanuts. Any lab, university, or decent experimenter can do it. Kraus' diagram in his Electromagnetics, Fourth Edition, shows the nondiverged energy flow component in the form of contours, which are MEASURED watts/square meter at each point, where a unit point static charge will catch that much more energy. Let me now give you a rigorous proof, and very simple, that every system is already vastly overunity by producing far more energy out than we input. Consider a perfect DC generator, loss free, so that its efficiency is 100%. Now consider a perfect external circuit attached, which consists of two short lengths of perfect conducting wire, and a pure resistance load. Let the load be 12 ohms, and the voltage of the generator be 12 Volts D.C. Now we have a neat little situation: We put in the mechanical power equivalent of 12 watts to the shaft. Since the generator is loss free, all the 12 watts are perfectly transduced into magnetic field, and the energy in this field is dissipated with 100% efficiency to form the source dipole. Let us leave the source dipole for a moment. Now we look at the external circuit. There is one ampere of current (12V divided by 12 Ohms) flowing in the external circuit. So we are inputting 12 watts of power to the generator shaft, and we are getting 12 watts of power output in the resistor. All this is clearly measurable and normal so far. Now we check out John D. Kraus, Electromagnetics, Fourth Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992. Figure 12-60, a and b, p. 578 shows a good drawing of the huge energy flow filling all space around the conductors, with almost all of it not intercepted and thus not diverged into the circuit to power it, but just "wasted." Hey! We have 12 watts of power in. We have 12 watts of power output of the resistor as heat. By conventional Poynting considerations, we are getting out precisely what we are inputting. That is a blatant lie. We are getting output from the resistor precisely as much as we are inputting to the shaft of the generator. Yet we also are getting out a measurable vast amount of energy flow from those generator terminals, filling all space around that circuit. Those Kraus contours are experimental measurements. Anyone can do them, or similar. Anyone can build a little system very similar to this one, and approximating it. So where the devil is all that VAST EXTRA MEASURABLE ENERGY FLOW pouring from the generator terminals, and missing the circuit entirely, COMING FROM? Experimentally we can easily prove that this Heaviside nondiverged energy flow is (1) real, and (2) very large. Let us now add in an extra set of "receiving antenna/collectors" whose circuitry is completely separate from the DC generator circuit with its load. Suppose we add enough of these "little antenna/interceptor/detector" circuits, each containing a little purely resistive load, to obtain 3 watts total in all those extra and independent circuits. Well, now we are inputting 12 watts. We are getting out 12 watts in the external resistor attached to the generator. We are also getting 3 watts out of the "extra receiver circuits" separately, in separate loads. So our total input is 12 watts. Our total output is 15 watts. Our demonstrated COP = 1.25. So how do the "experts" explain that simple experiment????" They don't. But any lab worth a tinker's dam -- and that includes any lab in Department Off Energy and in any university -- can do a similar experiment, catching enough of the extra "usually nondivergent EM energy flow" to bring the COP to COP>1.0. This is a very simple experiment. So is the Bohren experiment which produces COP=18, is published in the hard literature, and is independently replicated by two additional scientists and published in the same issue of Am. J. Phys. that published the Bohren experiment paper. Anyway, Lorentz's "physically insignificant" vast Heaviside nondiverged EM energy flow component is indeed "physically insignificant" to that single external circuit powered by that DC generator. But it is certainly not "physically insignificant" to those extra "receiver/collector circuits" and their independent loads. Let's use two imaginary viewgraphs where in the first one Lorentz is shown in a sailboat on an ocean, in a very nice large ocean wind. Puffing his pipe, Lorentz is smiling and saying, "Only the wind in my sails is of any physical significance". In the second graph, Lorentz is looking aside at a whole fleet of additional sailboats, calmly sailing along and powered by that "insignificant remaining component of the wind". And Lorentz is saying, "How can they be using that physically insignificant wind?" This is an exact analogy to the state of thinking that now exists in the U.S. power industry and the U.S. scientific community concerned with power systems. We don't have an energy crisis, we have a collection and usage crisis-and a vast scientific mindset crisis. Hopefully this will change in the future with highly capable scientists who know quaternion electrodynamics, Maxwell's original complete theory, etc.

( )

Oh nice❤❤❤

Isn't there stars bigger then sag a*?

I would love to put those 2000 old books on FICTION section on library

This is biggest lie on earth. God created adam as first man and eve his wife .

This is one of the best visual diagrams of human evolution I have ever seen. This was extremely beautiful and I appreciate it. I will be glad to donate.

New fear unlocked

THEEEE FUUUU.....

I grew up very close to this river. It's a good thing what these people are doing. But they will never see the Bronx River unpolluted. Even after they pull out all the human refuse, they would still have to dredge the toxic soil that is probably three feet thick after two centuries of using it for a sewage system and dumping place for industrial waste. That river used to glow green at night. We still swam in it...

This information, and the beautiful scenes of people working the hills of Peru in ancient ways together captivates and inspires me as I've recently added potatoes to the short list of crops I grow in my venture of pursuing a lifestyle of small scale natural agriculture in the hills of Kentucky, USA. Thank you.

The Mind-Body Math-Physics Measurement Problem situation of e-Pi-i 1-0-infinity Singularity-point positioning probabilistic correlations is WYSIWYG. The fascinating thing about crystal radio is the mechanism of diode demodulation, phonon extraction from the photons of the AM signal by the earpiece. I'm unqualified to detail how and why this is a Superhetrodyne function that emulates ears and eyes, but there's no shortage of experts. If you were to back engineer an Orchestra to the constituent nodal-vibrational emitter-receiver log-antilog interference positioning-location system that is math-music Electron-photon-phonon-Proton Neutronic oscillation, the default omnidirectional-dimensional logarithmic condensation wave-packaging Origin of all-ways all-at-once sync-duration holography dimensionality coordination is Euler's superimposed Quantum-fields Mechanism Holographic standing wave modulation cause-effect e-Pi-i. (You really have to exert yourself to jump to alternative interpretations) Characteristics of superimposed relative-timing sync-duration reference-framing are where-when we are here-now-forever. The extremes in POV of BBT or Fusion energy creation not covered by temporal thermodynamical superposition are what an Historian might call "cultural artifacts" of the kind Dr Lynne Kelly disclosed in The Memory Code book. Ie be-live by living with a repeat rote learned program of "magical" word associations that are "holy" treasure, as long as they are not subjected to logical magical-functional scrutiny. Misused and misunderstood contents in an inappropriate context is a natural probabilistic problem of uncertainty about positioning of condensed wave-particle log-antilog interference positioning-location. WYSIWYG, this is inside-outside holographic Sciencing. Let's not destroy the data from Telescopes by continuing primitive interpretation practices.

Axion. This is just a thought of mine, but... We never consider an axion to be large. So large, to be bigger than our observable universe. Why not? In many physicists' multiverse theories, this prospect is completely reasonable. If our visible universe is traveling through a larger space, with us in it, we won't observe this speed. I'm not imagining "Horton Hears a Who" in a bong rip fantasy here. I'm talking about the concepts of space and time magnitudes. I notice, that the most thoughtful of scientific-minded, or even fantasy-minded, never go to the next level. If there are other universe spaces, then why wouldn't motion between them exist? An analogy would be: Think of a clock face where our universe is simply a particle in the paint on the face? The second hand would move past ours exponentially with speeds and distances that surpass what we see in the most outrageous of mathematics theories. A simpleton uses the word/term "forever" to swipe away the most import of living and humanity, and yet never takes the time to understand that "a google of centuries" is just a breath at the start of that drop in the ocean. Think outside the box.. Our defined universe is only 93 billion light-years across... and it's a "thing". It's either got cousins, or goes on like the google of centuries... either way, a thing in space can occupy something much larger, and travel much faster. Fancy the thoughts. Gr8! Peace ☮💜Love

It seems so elegant to visit this older video with the understanding of what we've learned since.. the Higgs boson etc. It is just beautiful to understand the careful arguments on either side of the arguments of the physicists with forethought.

"You just look at it, and you notice..", after some practice recognising the properties of log-antilog Conformal Field Condensation Correspondence, that Euler nailed it, superimposed e-Pi-i fields of 0-1-2-ness log-antilog hyper-hypo reciprocation-recirculation potential condensation modulation superposition-quantization holography dimensionality, is just oozing out of superimposed frequency-amplitudes in temporal thermodynamical superposition and it's real-time relative-timing sum-of-all-histories not a tentative supposition by guess or by godlike manufacturing processes. (Which is probably funded by extremely vile obfuscation sources of Dark Money pretensions)

To the man with a technological hammer, every solution to a binding problem looks like a to-the-point nail. Fusion Function Nuclear power has no actual nails like atomic Fission and seeks to hit the problem with a bigger hammer of indiscriminate heating. It has been demonstrated by LHC that colliding nodal-vibrational atomic loci do not spray a clean product of photons that might make magical reverse process possible, as most EM generation does when you look at the details, of effective electrical power production. The shame of calling it science! Because, the text book, Chemical Bonding Clarified through Quantum Mechanics, shows how the properties of phonons match photons in Principle, using Feynman's diagnosis of vertices in vortices nodal-vibrational emitter-receiver log-antilog interference positioning-location system, and you can demonstrate even to little kids how spirals of water in a stream etc reflect or merge along parallel axes "mathematically", +/-. First Principle conic-cyclonic coherence-cohesion objectives in Functional phenomena reduce to the log-antilog inside-outside event of Singularity-point frequency-amplitudes interference alignment positioning, in QM-TIME Completeness Actuality holography-quantization. Most information release to the public is dominated by Dark Money propaganda, real-time relative-timing sum-of-all-histories quantization cause-effect projection-drawing is carefully blamed on misattribution emotional b-s.

Interesting

Such quality content I'm wordless

Two hearts 💕 living in a separate world 🌍 Human and mankind Human are heru or Horus Mankind are neanderthal Human are hue Mankind are apes Human are black people Mankind are white Arab Chinese India and other Planet of the apes 😮

59:20 bro said yet , neil knows the gpt explosion in the 2 years from when this event happened

Lesson of the day: people like to use know what 😂😂😂

human = crypto

Very interesting, congratulations on the excellent work.

4:28 invention of condoms

3:49 So if I'm understanding correctly, the 18-lenses trilobites weren't inherently better than the 17-lenses trilobites, just that because of the circumstances surrounding the disappearances of the seas around the Midwest. Isn't this genetic drift (maybe even an example of a population bottleneck)?

As a plant and soil ecologist, I do not think we will reach 9 billion people. We are degrading our Earth’s life support systems so rapidly that we are rapidly lowering the number of people the planet will support in the near future.

This is a wonderful video. Thank you for showing off this amazing ancient biology. Please more shorts of fossils like this (inverts too ☺️ if y'all want)

This is amazingly done. Thank you so much. I learned better visually, and it felt good to finally get a mental image of human evolution history.