So is Citizen paying these KZfaqrs to talk about them or what? No way in hell any of them would be caught dead wearing one in public.

This American laughed so hard, he swallowed his Kinder Egg.

More of Tom banter please….

Of these watches, I find the aesthetic balance of the Piaget Altiplano Ultimate Concept Tourbillon the most persuasive. Still, they all bore me. Why? Well... why not?

Glue sniffing! LOL!

The description of the date window on the Tudor made me laugh uncontrollably for a full minute. You're the GOAT watch guy!

The hand jobs is what’s needed to finish. ROFL

Audemars Piguet going gettho is not going to do them any good. What were they thinking?

Another one who drank the Kool-Aid. Congrats. I have three Rolies, and haven't drank the bug juice.

Andrew - You are absolutely and hilariously BRILLIANT!!!

Nico is like Shrek

you get a pass in English literature or should it be poetry?

22 minutes of pure fun (and reconsiderations)! Thank you Andrew :)

Ye, I have zero desire to ever get a Rolex.

I thought you are talking about other things and not this sh!t on earth, I would never buy a thing here is the name from any a$$hol3 on in, but when you do it then must be a huge brain dmg in your empty head!

The digital PRX is absolutely horrendous.

Hello from Canada Andrew. I can’t help but laugh at the euphemisms you use! Have watched a bunch of your content. Nice job my man👍🏻.

Watchfighter is your new name

20:53 MARIA? Who is Maria?

Watchfighter

Feeding the algorithm

the funniest watch video I’ve ever seen 😂

The Credor looks like a cheap Quartz watch…in fact, I think it’s ugly

Project paperclip wasn’t the rocket project it was the project to relocate German scientists in the US

Mortgage needed to pay all streaming companies 😂

Thanks a million the last one is yummy 😋

Omega has much more history, like 60 years more. It was already a very well established brand with high reputation for innovation, quality and robustness when Rolex was beginning. 2. Omega has in-house movements since the XIXth century and has only used in-family movements for two decades, part of the 1980s and the 1990s, but never stopped producing some in-house movements. Rolex never made a single movement until very few years ago, already in the XXIst century. All of them were off the shelf Aegler's, just as others used ETA, like Breitling did for so many decades until recently. Rolex in some decades used also other brands too, like Valjoux’s and Zenith’s. So, Rolex movements made by Aegler were not even “in-family”… And that is true for all the famous movements inside Rolexes from the 1960s and 1970s, not Rolex, Aegler’s. 3. Omega has produced high horology, some of the principal high complications in horology, since the XIXth century, minute repeaters and perpetual calendars, and since 1947 Omega produces one of the most complicated challenges in horology, Tourbillons. And not just a Tourbillon, but a central Tourbillon, of which, by the way, Omega produces now not one but two different calibers, and has produced, several more along its history. Very few brands can make, know how to produce and want to produce Tourbillons. Omega is one of those. Rolex has never produced high horology. Not only that, Omega produces a solid gold Tourbillon movement. Gold movements are produced by only a few, like VC, FP Journe and Omega. 4. Omega made a Group Company, SSIH, with Lemania. Two brands of the same company and together designed and produced some of the most refined chronograph movements of horological history, like the 321, again produced by Omega today, a caliber used by Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin and Roger Dubuis, among others. In fact, caliber 321 is in great part responsible for the continuation and resurgence of mechanical horology since the quartz crisis. Other Omega chronograph caliber (nothing less), like the 1861 has also been used by Vacheron Constantin, and also by Franck Muller... Also, Audemars Piguet has used at least one Omega in-house caliber, time only. So, Omega calibers have been used by Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin, Roger Dubuis, Breguet, Audemars Piguet, Chopard, Zenith, Cartier, Franck Muller and are the base for the amazing and artisanal hand made Atelier de Chronometrie watches. The reason for this is their extremely high quality and qualities. Aegler's and Rolex movements were never used by a single one of those brands, only by Gruen. And there are good reasons for that. Rolex couldn't made their own chronograph movement (neither a simple time movement) until the 2000s, so they used Valjoux, which are very good, and Zenith's, also very good. But it is clear that horologically they didn't have the capacity Omega had for decades and even more than 100 years before Rolex began producing their own movements. Omega had in-house movements, time only and chronographs, even in the pocket watch era, in the XIXth century and chronographs before their association with Lemania. In fact, caliber 321 is strongly based on an Omega caliber previous to the association with Lemania, and was produced mostly because of an Omega initiative. Very few brands were capable of producing their own calibers and more so their own chronograph movements. Longines and Angelus did it. Of course, Omega. Not even Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin or Audemars Piguet could, they began making their own movements just until the Swatch Group stop selling them the Omega-Lemania 321 (to PP and VC; AP used also a Lemania module). The new chronograph calibers by PP and VC are completely based on the Omega-Lemania movement. 5. Omega is a pioneer in technology, such as the Co-Axial but also of the finest quartz movements, and of materials. The first time a company used the stainless steel Rolex uses today was Omega in the early 1970s. The Megaquartz from the early 1970s were some 15 times more accurate than the Oysterquartz from 2001… 6. It is one of the very few brands to engage in a new escapement, and to this moment one of the most different and high performance escapement technologies in centuries. Breguet has also done marvels, but only in very few numbers. Omega has achieved this for large production, not easy. 7. Rolex made their first dive watch in 1953, the Submariner, 100mts water resistant, and strongly based on the Blancpain from months earlier (that’s another interesting story). Omega made 22 years earlier a divers watch for 135mts deep, the Marine. When Omega was producing Seamaster 300s good for 200mts deep, Rolex was making Submariners 100mts WR (it took Rolex several years more, already in the 1960s, to make them 200mts WR, something Omega achieved in 1957), and so on those differences are maintained with Omega always producing more performant technologies and watches. Simply put, better watches. The most extreme divers Rolex today is a Deep Sea, good for 11,000mts depth (until some months ago it was 3,900mts depth). The most extreme divers Omega since some years now is capable of 15,000mts depth. The Rolex Milgauss, is specifically made to be non affected by magnetism. Rolex doesn't publish the actual data (their webpage states a dubious 1000 Gauss, it should be more), but being a brand that publicizes so many doubtful data, like being the first to produce a divers watch (literally said in their webpage and completely false), being the first to produce a GMT (wrong again), etc, one would expect they would publish a better result than Omega if they had it. Any ladies mechanical dress Omega stands 15,000 Gauss. But Omega doesn't do the marketing Rolex does. 8. The finishing of the movements in Omegas has always been superior to the industrial finishing of Rolex (Aegler’s) movements. Just comparing, for example, calibers 5XX, 55X, 56X or 75X to their Rolex counterparts, calibers 1066 or 1575, will quickly evidence this. But the same today with 8500 vs 3231.

Noo onion crowns are the best!

i kinda like the grey black steel new GMT though...

I bought this popular video watch from mamacoo , which was originally priced at a few thousand dollars, but now it's only $380! It's really suitable to pick up feces!

i love you so much! I recently just found your mamacoo and i’m in love!! Your videos are so fun and you energy is just MWAH! keep living your life

#mamacoo 's watch really surprises me！

You truly take scriptwriting to another level......

Succumb to the crown 👑😅❤️

This one resonated with me😂 The thing is, I still regret those regrets. Regret, it seems, is like a chap's balcony over the sweetshop; it grows with time.

I'm a knifemaker. Heat treating steel is an absolutely vital aspect of my job. It's what makes the difference between a knife that will last a lifetime, and a piece of steel that just happens to be shaped like a knife. When it comes to watch making, colouring screws blue with heat doesn't offer ANY advantages over colouring them by any other method other than satisfaction for the watchmaker. MASSIVE respect for the skill required to use that method!

I would love a Rolex. The price is nearly in reach!

the Alpine Eagle is simply stunning!!! it is a must buy!!! also, i would add the Christopher Ward Twelve X Ti

I'd rather have a goid duve watch, like Sinn or Seiko.

Those Royters 🤩

If I was your psychiatrist I would be saying "Have you ever thought about Aliexpress quartz specials" whilst substantially increasing your dosage...

Andrew probably thinks we watch the full videos because he always starts by mentioning the last watch is the best. 😂

You can't take the Jacob and Co watch seriously ..Tyson Fury didn't ,thats why he lost.

Bro I shat myself the moment I Heard those Amber jokes holy shiiiiit! 💨💀

This is the best KZfaq video I have watched in a long time, great writing and well produced video 🙌

president of kenya good lad on the langa also the british prime ministers should all be sporting british independant watches

I've got a Cartier, which I love, but htf did you know about my umbrella stand, shoehorn and piercing eyes?

Happy you showed the dornburn. A new watch company id never heard of & i like the look of immediately.

Cool new brand on the radar: Dornbluth, thanks for sharing, I didn't know them!

😂😂😂