Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
7 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@Rope-a-dope-v7y 3 күн бұрын
At 6:56 … ‘Sailing’ is an oil on canvas, not a watercolor
@LaurenceShafe 2 күн бұрын
Thank you for pointing that out. The mistake is at 6:39 when I say "watercolour" and the painting is also mislabelled. It is oil on canvas and at the Carnegie Museum of Art. He had worked in watercolour before then and produced 'Sailboats' in watercolour in 1895 but that is a very different work and is at the Whitney Museum of American Art.
@bivekhunjan2888 7 күн бұрын
Fabulous video loved it
@tim.timothy.brennan 7 күн бұрын
Enjoyed your analysis here! interesting that fumes from the oils and other oils/turps etc would then be maybe the reason why Aubrey was only using inks? Iwonder if his life lasted longer that he might have embraced colour in the work's? Doesn't matter though does it what a genius this man was thank you for a most interesting vid!!!
@danieledney5775 11 күн бұрын
Wow this is so so interesting!!
@alinagorelova1147 12 күн бұрын
Could you please cover individual artists and their biographies? You're so amazing at those.
@LaurenceShafe 11 күн бұрын
Thank you for your feedback. I have two more general talks to complete first and then I shall be returning to individual artists. My aim to to cover Western Art in about 250 one-hour talks starting with cave art and ending at the present day and before the Renaissance we know little about individual artists.
@tiadiad 16 күн бұрын
Beautiful stuff!
@dtouey 19 күн бұрын
Before I watch the video I can't help but weigh in on the "Matisse." There's only one thing to say about these things--it's either a forgery or the worst thing Matisse ever did.
@user-bf8di4re1v 20 күн бұрын
By far the best art history series I've found anywhere. Wonderfully comprehensive and thoughtful. Thank you so much for your great effort and expertise in putting these together!
@Davidbirdman101 25 күн бұрын
Oh yeah! I love medieval artwork and architecture. Especially the doodles in the old manuscripts. I think they're great. Thank you Dr Shafe for another enlightening video!
@tiadiad 26 күн бұрын
His late work is magnificent.
@agasurreal 26 күн бұрын
Absolutely brilliant. Thank you for this lecture
@ellengeyer5000 Ай бұрын
Another wonderful commentary. Thank you your effort.
@tiadiad Ай бұрын
Love his poetry.
@CSchaeken Ай бұрын
Thank you Dr Shafe, always interesting!
@Algabatz Ай бұрын
Very interesting, thank you!
@vanessanicolav Ай бұрын
great class! thanks so much for that
@roxannespear1072 Ай бұрын
Amazing as usual. Thank you!
@ailishmcelroy3532 Ай бұрын
Thank you, very informative
@maxlinder5262 Ай бұрын
AT 52.00 CHRIST DOES HAVE A HALO .. LOOK CLOSER.....JUST MY OPINION......
@LaurenceShafe Ай бұрын
@@maxlinder5262 Sorry, I cannot see a halo on ‘Christ in Madonna and Child with Saint Anne’ and the Wikipedia page on the painting en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna_and_Child_with_Saint_Anne_(Dei_Palafrenieri) points out how unusual this is.
@tiadiad Ай бұрын
I could listen to Dr Laurence for days. Fascinating stuff!
@jersey63 Ай бұрын
Looking forward to part 2!
@israeldiegoriveragenius2th164 Ай бұрын
Now the Royal Academy is farcical.
@oowaz Ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this, very insightful, thanks!
@CSchaeken Ай бұрын
I enjoyed the juxtaposition of the two artists!
@Yoda-wu8is Ай бұрын
When did Nicolosia die?
@LaurenceShafe Ай бұрын
The short answer is we don't know. She married Andrea Mantegna (c. 1431-1506) in 1453 when he was 22 and they had seven children. We believe it was a long and happy marriage and after she died he never remarried so she died well before 1506.
@marypartridge5154 Ай бұрын
I love his use of white
@marypartridge5154 Ай бұрын
Oh yes I should have said he disheartens me because he is so good.
@marypartridge5154 Ай бұрын
Im a painter but seeing him disheartens me. Today its all abstract and modern and in the end do you choose reality or abstract. I dont have a clue anymore.
@edwardtranfaglia8397 Ай бұрын
Her painting doesn't look like realist to me
@CSchaeken Ай бұрын
Very interesting artist, never heard of him, so thanks Dr Shafe.
@arturomartinez4792 Ай бұрын
sfumato is an effect not a technique
@MegPier Ай бұрын
Thank you! Very interesting & enlightening!
@Minimmalmythicist Ай бұрын
I got the picture of Boticelli at the bottom right, I thought the faces looked a bit off for Boticelli in the picture above and I thought in the picture below the painting was technically better.
@mikejones-go8vz Ай бұрын
Donald Trump 😂
@MegPier Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@MegPier Ай бұрын
Very illuminating and enjoyable! Thank you!
@Algabatz Ай бұрын
Very interesting, thank you.
@israeldiegoriveragenius2th164 Ай бұрын
Stick it all in the skip.
@MegPier Ай бұрын
Greetings from CT in the U S. Thank you! Very insightful and enjoyable! I look forward to more of your series.
@Algabatz Ай бұрын
Very interesting, thanks! A few years back I was asked by a Swedish gallery in Stockholm to make 30 fakes of 30 artists for an exhibition, signatures not copied of course. If you're interested, here's a short film how I copied Vermeer's Girl with a pearl earring: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jtVhrapi3NzaZKM.html
@Algabatz Ай бұрын
Very interesting!
@Algabatz Ай бұрын
Very interestng, thanks!
@robertfontaine356 Ай бұрын
You describe Gormley"s Testing a World View as consisting of five figures but I only see four. Did one of the figures leave the room? I think that it is ironic in the extreme that painters almost never win (if they even bother entering) a prize named in honour of a great and innovative English painter. If I look at the Sobey Art Award here in Canada, it seems that the juries of these awards only consider political statements to be "art". This has alienated much of the general public with regards to contemporary art. The tabloids have a field day for good reason. Easy target: like shooting the proverbial fish in a barrel (which may well be a piece by Damien Hirst). When did craftsmanship, and aesthetics and (frankly) talent stop being meritorious? In my opinion, if you have to explain (and explain and explain) a piece of visual art, it is not very successful. A circus indeed.
@LaurenceShafe Ай бұрын
There are five figures in Gormley's work but only four shown in the photograph. I like your idea that one has left the room. I am in love with two-dimensional art so I agree there should be more awards for painting, drawing, engraving etc. I do like works with layers of hidden meaning and my job is to explain.
@robertfontaine356 Ай бұрын
@@LaurenceShafe You explain extremely well Dr. Shafe. It just seems to me that many of these artists have taken off without a flight plan.
@orab9492 Ай бұрын
A 25 k Pounds worth prize should be called The Shmondak prize not the Turner - dear Brits...
@LaurenceShafe Ай бұрын
I had to look up the Yiddish word shmondak which it seems is similar to schmuck and although obscene in Yiddish in English is usually translated as "jerk", that is "stupid, foolish, obnoxious, contemptible or detestable".
@CSchaeken Ай бұрын
Thanks Dr Shafe, for keeping me informed about modern art. 👍
@deadby15 Ай бұрын
The Solar Punk aesthetics may revive some of his ideas.
@israeldiegoriveragenius2th164 2 ай бұрын
Establishment clown award, not controversial at all, state funded propaganda promoting nihilism and consumption. So boring nobody takes notice of it.
@CSchaeken 2 ай бұрын
I only knew Gainsborough through his portrait of Mr and Mrs Andrews, which I find a fascinating image. So pleased to hear more about his interesting and turbulent life! Thanks!
@rotarystone7085 2 ай бұрын
Brilliant
@CSchaeken 2 ай бұрын
Thank you Dr Shafe, always interesting. 👍