I LOVE MY PROTESTANT BROTHERS WHO DO SO MANY WORKS OF CHARITY AND HAVE SO MANY COMMON GOALS WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH LIKE BEING PRO-LIFE ETC. HOWEVER, I HAVE MANY QUESTIONS ON SOLA SCRIPTURA. FOR INSTANCE, DID JESUS PROMISE A BOOK OR A CHURCH? WHERE DOES THE BIBLE STATES THE WORDS "SOLA SCRIPTURA"? WHERE IN THE BIBLE IS GOD'S WORD RESTRICTED ONLY TO WHAT IS WRITTEN DOWN? WHY WAS THERE CONFUSION IN THE EARLY CHURCH OVER WHICH BOKS WERE INSPIRED? HOW DID THE EARLY CHURCH EVANGELIZE AND SURVIVED WHILE BEING BRUTALLY PERSECUTED BY THE ROMAN EMPIRE FOR ABOUT 350 YEARS WITHOUT KNOWING FOR SURE WHICH BOOKS BELONG IN THE CANON OF SCRIPTURE? IF CHRISTIANITY IS A "BOOK RELIGION" HOW DID IT FLOURISHED IN THE FIRST 1500 YEARS WHEN MOST PEOPLE WERE ILLITERATE? IF JESUS INTENDED FOR CHRISTIANITY TO BE EXCLUSIVELY A "RELIGION OF THE BOOK" WHY DID HE WAIT 1400 YEARS BEFORE SHOWING SOMEONE HOW TO BUILD A PRINTING PRESS? IF THE EARLY CHURCH BELIEVED IN SOLA SCRIPTURA, WHY DO THE CREEDS OF THE EARLY CHURCH ALWAYS SAY "WE BELIEVE IN THE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH", AND NOT "WE BELIEVE IN HOLY SCRIPTURE"? WHY DID THE DOCTRINE OF SOLA SCRIPTURA WAS NEVER RAISED BY THE CHURCH FATHERS, BUT IT WAS FIRST RAISED BY JOHN CALVIN MANY CENTURIES AFTER JESUS' ASCENSION? WHERE IN THE NEW TESTAMENT DO THE APOSTLES TELL FUTURE GENERATIONS THAT THE CHRISTIAN FAITH WILL BE BASED SOLELY ON A BOOK? HOW DO WE KNOW FROM THE BIBLE ALONE THAT THE LETTERS OF ST. PAUL, WHO WROTE TO 1ST CENTURY CONGREGATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS, WERE MEANT TO BE READ BY US 2000 YEARS LATER? ON WHAT BIBLICAL BASIS DO WE THINK THAT EVERYTHING THAT THE APOSTLES TAUGHT IS CAPTURED IN THE NEW TESTAMENT WRITINGS? WHERE DOES THE BIBLE CLAIM TO BE THE SOLE AUTHORITY FOR CHRISTIANS IN MATTERS OF FAITH AND MORALS? WHO MAY AUTHORITATIVELY ARBITRATE BETWEEN CHRISTIANS WHO CLAIM TO BE LEAD BY THE HOLY SPIRIT INTO MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS OF THE BIBLE? WHO IN THE CHURCH HAD THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE WHICH BOOKS BELONGED IN THE NEW TESTAMENT CANON AND TO MAKE THIS DECISION BINDING ON ALL CHRISTIANS? IF NO ONE HAS THE AUTHORITY, CAN I THEN REMOVE OR ADD BOOKS IN THE CANON ON MY OWN AUTHORITY? IF WE NEED AN AUTHORITY TO INTERPRET THE US CONSTITUTION (US SUPREME COURT) WHY WOULN'T WE HAVE A SOLE AUTHORITY TO INTERPRET THE BIBLE WHICH IS MUCH MORE DIFFICULT TO INTERPRET? ISN'T KIND OF STRANGE THAT OUR PROTESTANTS BROTHERS AGREE WITH THE CATHOLIC AUTHORITY IN AS MUCH AS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CANON OF THE NEW TESTAMENT? GOD BLESS YOU ALL.

Thank you Dr. Rod😊

Janet come to islam

This isn't an interview. This is a circle jerk.

Amen Dr. White ! The Papists need to get their heads out of their Butts !!!

the equation of gay rights with civil rights is a legitimate argument. homosexuals are just as entitled to be free and unfettered in their daily lives in exactly the same way blacks are entitled to be free and unfettered in their lives. funny how some people, like bigoted vod here, dont see the parallel oppression. his community fought and are still fighting for equal civil rights in the cesspit that is america. but gay people are, in his disgusting opinion, not entitled to be free and unfettered because he has an imaginary friend obsessed with what people do with their genitals. who calls them "sinners" lol. do you think he would be happy to shackle up and become a plantation owners property ? I doubt it. but the very same book he`s using to condemn the gay community, justified the enslavement of his ancestors. and supports their enslavement. according to his imaginary friend there is nothing wrong enslaving people. his african ancestors did not subscribe to the, invisible, white mans` god. it was sold to them by their oppressors and he`s still buying and selling white man god. his entire premise hangs on a bogus book full of nonsense, genocide and slavery. the work of men not a god.

Very well said.👍👍👍

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bsyghaiYtK6doYU.html

The only difference between racist haters and christian haters is the fact that the former justifies their hatred through a sense of intellectual superiority, while the latter seeks to selfishly humanize themselves through a sense of moral superiority. So its a matter of the type of superiority that they are seeking ti instill in themselves through the stone of subjective comparison. In its truest definition, homosexuality is not a behavior ( neither is heterosexuality) while one choose to express their sexuality, that is not what defines their sexuality, but the fundamental orientation itsself. However, terms such as " gay lifestyle" are important due to the implication of choice, which subconciously justifies contempt and hatred through the stone of subjective comparison. Churches marry people who divorced for reasons other than adultery, which is, according to the bible, adultery. The bible has been used in order to justify the mistreatment of other people for centuries. Ask the televangelists to genuinely sacrifice for the good of mankind and watch their response.

The description of homosexuality as a lifestyle is a blatent oversimplification of human sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular. The purpose of this indoctrination of the collective societal psyche is paramount to the self validating delusion of heterosexuality possessing moral validity. The reason that we never hear the term " heterosexual lifestyle " is because such catogorazion is not needed in order to subconciously justify contempt and hatred through subjective comparison. The entire gay rights movement began as a counter protest to the dehumanizing way that homosexuals were being treated by Christians seeking to selfishly humanize themselves through the stone of subjective comparison.

The entire gay rights movement began as a counter protest to the dehumanizing way that homosexuals were being treated by Christians seeking to selfishly humanize themselves through the stone of subjective comparison.

Who are these so-called black leaders? I don't know any black leaders currently in the 21st century that can be accurately titled a black leader. We haven't voted anybody in our community as a black leader

Is gay the new black? My question is : Can you seriously pose this question to someone who is black AND gay??? Christians are not necessarily bigots, but you guys are most definitely bigoted Christians. You’re talking about gay people in the same way that White racists talked about (and still do talk about) black people who were engaged in the Civil Rights Movement! Homosexuality is not an activity.. It’s an orientation. Who, in their right mind, would choose to be gay, considering the way they are treated by their families, the church and society at large? You are who you are! Also, you’re throwing scriptures around to condemn gay people. Do you realize that the same Bible you’re quoting includes scriptures which condone slavery? In fact, the slave masters used these scriptures to sanction their enslavement, beating, raping, and lynching of the Black people who weren’t even considered human beings!

Dave Daubenmire represents himself, not the Lord. Until he repents, all his money perish with him.

eudaimonism. Fascinating. Every time Dr. Rosenblatt talks I learn something. 😂👍

Father really? Shut his ass up-idiots

Hello friend (I’ve just realised I don’t know your name!). This is the first time I've stated this publicly, but it's a view I've actually held since I was a suspicious early teenager, in the early '70s, when the word "gay" in its current sense first took hold. I've always watched the way words progress through the language. I remember when the coinage first began to be promulgated, and I could immediately see why. If you read any literature before about 1971, you'll find the meaning of the word confined to its long-used sense. It was rarely, if ever, applied to any description of one's sexuality (sexual preference). Since its hijacking, it’s been impossible to use the word in any other sense without having to at least clarify. It's time Christians actually debated the application of the word itself, instead of using it unthinkingly, and therefore buying into it. I'm noticing that even Christian preachers scripturally opposed to homosexuality inadvertently normalise the use of "gay" by treating it as synonymous with homosexuality. Consider the statement, “I’m not a hater of gay people”. To make this statement is to say more than one might mean to say. Apart from inaccurately expressing a truth about Christians (they don’t hate the person, only the sin) they are also unconsciously making a concession to an embedded command that we see homosexuality a certain way; that we de-couple the “state of being” from the act; that we discount any idea that choice is a factor - even though we apply the notion of volition to any other sin. It makes debate much trickier than it ought to be. The church should not be contributing to this situation. The word “gay” was invented for a reason. Before its use spread to the general population, "homosexual" was the term in popular use, obviously. The homosexual movement, as did other loud interest groups, had some ingenious PR working for them. They achieved two things very quickly: they developed "weapon words" to shame opponents and make them fear expressing opposition ("homophobic" was just one result), and they found a little word to describe themselves which was, in fact, a complete redefinition of who and what they were. The term "gay" enabled them to detach sexual preference from their self-description. Once that was achieved, it was easy for the word to snowball semantically. To be "gay" now means something other than to have a sexual inclination; it now describes a state of being. It has allowed homosexuals to place this state of being on a par with one's race, gender or nationality (see Martina Navratilova’s description of those who opposed same-sex marriage as “racist”. Once it would have been considered a ridiculous equivalence). “Gay” in this sense has probably usurped the original word as a lexical entry, but it wasn’t a matter of natural semantic development. Interest groups these days are pretty savvy to the trick of kidnapping words and meanings. The implications of this coinage are huge. It created an entirely new ground for debate, and we keep meeting them on this playing-field. Even Christians have been cowed into drawing the line at questioning this very self-description, imposed and insisted upon by the homosexual sector of society (calling it a “community” is another feat of linguistic legerdemain, and we have fallen for that one as well). Those who advocate for the homosexual movement have been enabled, thanks to this coinage, to speak of being “born gay” (because, let’s face it, you can’t say someone is born with a sexual preference); to search for a “gay gene” in order to reinforce the notion that homosexuality is inherent; to create their own victimology (it’s more emotive to say you are picked on for what you ARE [gay] rather than what you do [prefer to have sexual relations with people of the same sex]); to march alongside black people or people with disabilities as an oppressed minority; to speak further myths into existence, like, say, a “gay holocaust”; to extend the usage to others by employing sly “gay” words like "bromance" (others are "man hug" and "man crush") that (homo)sexualise even friendship; to create gay “heroes”, gay “icons”, gay literature - it goes on. The development of this little word is testimony to the human ability to conjure concepts out of nothing and then reify them by speaking of them endlessly until they become real - in the sense that they affect behaviour and impact society. One symptom of the evil chaos that besets the world is that epistemological problems abound, and are proliferating exponentially. This begins with language - just look at the staggeringly extensive lexicon the Covid event has introduced with a mere year of its existence. Truth becomes the casualty. Christians need to be a little more thoughtful and discerning and question existing narratives, no matter how entrenched they now are in “normality”. If they don’t, they inadvertently play a part in furthering these agendas, and make it more difficult for fellow Believers to combat them.

2021 here. This is practically prophetic. 15:55. "Going to move to incest, polyamory, lowering age of consent..." Spot on. We're seeing that slippery slope talked about now in Biden America.

I thank my Lord he lead me away from this heresy!😫🙏

I see his latest piece of Alt Truth is that he prayed Barr out of office the man should not be given the oxygen of publicity, he is dangerous and delusional

Interesting approach to this question "did Yeshua ben Yusuf addressed the Greek Agape Love i.e. Same Gender Sexuality." In referring to Genesis 2 I would like to read This KZfaq Community's response to the following: What Biblical reasoning is there to maybe illuminate the seemingly accidental creation of the Man With A Womb i.e. woMAN? By going through Genesis 2 one will read that YHWH state that MAN's creation is not to be alone, so YHWH decide to create a being that eventually would be his i.e. the MAN's Wife. But what di YHWH proceed to create Non-Humans out of which the MAN supposed to find future Wife. But for some Biblically not given REASON, the MAN did not find a future Wife to be amongst the NON-Human created beings. This by itself generate a second question Was YHWH in this instance on the road to instituting beastiality?

Listen to you on the radio the 5 of August 2020. Why you tear down people like that. You don't see yourself.

You'r a big hypocrite. Are you really born again.

THIS PREACHER MAY BE IN THE CLOSET HIMSELF. HOW MANY TIMES HAS TRUTH COME OUT ABOUT A PREACHER WHO CONDEMS GAYS AND IS GAY HIMSELF!!!!!

I am sorry but sadly this is the reason why the church is failing against homosexuality and various ideals. Your argument simply goes to what the bible says which in a far more intelligent world sounds pretty stupid. Learn to give logical reasons why certain beliefs were created and develops the argument and stop being lazy by saying the bible says so. I like how you started off well with how they went about using the psychology of sensitization and alignments to gradually infiltrate. Study how it affects society scientifically over a period of time and where it comes from and how to minimize the unnatural start ups of the habit in young people. People your belief doesnt save lives, practical reasoning, sciences and action does then you can wrap it into your religious teachings which is a tool for spreading information.

Thanks Pastor for being so transparent and respecting the biblical truth inspite of all odds. We need many more pastor like you to raise up the banner of God and live up to the true meaning of who a Christian is as well as teaching what is written. There are too many preachers who evade this subject altogether, but the Lord raised you for such a time as this. I am proud of you. Sister Carmen

Disgusting homophobia.

Who was the mysterious young naked man who was following Jesus and managed to escape when they arrested Jesus and tried to apprehend him?

A True Man of God! Courage to spare! God Bless you sir!

I wonder when all those high school boys are going to come forward about the sexual abuse they suffered from the Coach.

The hypocrisy of this man is mindblowing. Even as he was giving this interview he was carrying on multiple adulterous affairs. God has a special place in hell for such scoundrels.

He is anti-gay and homophobic. He's FULL of hate. I would not want him around my kids.

This guy is dangerous for society,too much hate in his eyes

Junge Du und deine Kirche haben schwer einen am Helm Würd mich auf Schwachsinn untersuchen lassen Freifahrt in die Klapse

What a cry baby

Learn historic Theology.

If the bible is the only rule of faith...then how come the bible doesn't say that anywhere?and what happened before the late fourth century when the church told us what books were part of inspired works. Mr. White and his host are both admitting the visable and apparent truth that the protestants cannot agree on much of anything except that JESUS came and was god incarnate! You need an infallible interpretation for your infallble bible! and individuals and people including mr. White are preaching a doctrine NEVER preached by anyone before luther....so for solo scriptura to be true it wouldn't have started one thousand five hundred years after CHRIST founded his church. Before the printing press was invented books were laboriously hand copied, and the cost of one was way beyond all but the richest of people. And except for a very small group ,90 some percent COULD NOT READ! I think god would have come up with a better plan than everyone reading and deciding what scripture said than that.... he did its called the living tradition of the church he founded....close to forty thousand separate and distinct denominations don't lie.....sola scriptura is a lie promulgated by satan himself....but the bible predicted a mass falling away and false teachers....we're getting closer to the time of the great tribulation...

Dear lord protect me from your followers like Janet Medford

She is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. She gives Christians a bad name

Excellent

We're seeing the fulfillment of this with the rise of the Religious Right and the cult of Trump. Fascinating interview.

Why does Janet talk with Scott Lively who said Nazi Germany was run by gay men? So weird and creepy. She is friends with him www.timesofisrael.com/pastor-who-said-gay-nazis-behind-holocaust-to-run-for-massachusetts-governor/

REVELATION 19:21 He himself (The Lion of the tribe of Judah)will tread the winepress of ALMIGHTY God's wrath and Fierceness against the wicked!🗡🛡✝️✡⚡🦁

Daubenmire is about nothing but bullying. Fuck him.

Fuck "coach" Daubenmire. He's an asshole.

Janet. The poster child for for atheism

The LGBT "agenda "? Give me a break ! Bigotry is bigotry ! You can't be a good person and be opposed to LGBT rights - period !

I wonder what ever happened to Tullian after his fall?

Daubenmire is a dick.

Terrible presentation. When proclaiming a doctrine that supposedly teaches the sole authority of Scripture, only two Scriptures were used and those used out of context. In nearly 35 mins of discussion only TWO Scriptures.... It seems to me that Dr White does exactly what he accused others of-fighting tradition with tradition. I heard more references to the reformers than to the actual Scriptures or the writers of it. How do we take this doctrine seriously in the context it is commonly professed!