10 years ago and no comments. I'll put a change to that! You missed AI...
@annephilipiah14552 ай бұрын
This is the only video I understood about Mendelow Matrix
@davidriley3543 ай бұрын
Everything I learned in yesterday's 3 hour class that is mandatory attendance, I learned in this 13 minute video. Easy to feel like a pleb when this happens, and this happens a lot.
@angelnanette46674 ай бұрын
Capacity to contract..can you please elaborate?
@Rache-sx7lc4 ай бұрын
I did not understand why their financial affairs won't be private. The 3rd disadvantage
@rosemarybweupe3904 ай бұрын
That was really helpful
@Creativityandtrending5 ай бұрын
Who is watching in 2024. Love for them❤
@HectorEduardo-rj3cp5 ай бұрын
Injunction
@sheborasambakamara12796 ай бұрын
This Lecture is really educative, very precise and interesting. But the only concern is you did not talk about Implied waiver of the communication requirement in the case of a Unilateral contract. I am not sure, but I guess it’s probably because your focus is on Bilateral contracts
@walterdasilva65886 ай бұрын
This actually makes sense now . Learnt more in 11 minutes than in one whole year at uni . Thank you so much for this content , very much appreciated 🎉
@raihanatafida78876 ай бұрын
This video was educative
@chrishoesing545510 ай бұрын
Lean production makes a buisness less rubust and flexible leading to things like the plague disaster a couple years ago have a much more devastating effect on the market than it otherwise would have. Easier to survive a famine if you have a little fat on you.
@chrishoesing545510 ай бұрын
I love that people feel like common sense was just invented because someone came up with an acronym. Like "reducing waste is good" OH my gosh! Genius!
@GodIsWithin310 ай бұрын
Awesome, thank you!
@tukuzaphiri776010 ай бұрын
Make a video on collective agreements
@alanasoul34410 ай бұрын
Thank yo so much for this
@egghead343511 ай бұрын
we're watching this in class rn
@drummerboy1066 Жыл бұрын
The Pharmaceutical Society argued that placing the item in the bask was the acceptance. This was the artificial argument they created to mitigate the fact that a pharmacist was able to supervise transactions at the cash desk - thus meeting their duty under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act.
@teresawong3700 Жыл бұрын
hi, may I know what if the party A agrees to transfer party B money, and party B said she will deliver the cake for party A once she make the payment. Then party A transfer party B money for the cake, and in this consideration what's case study that we can write about?
@Sandeep-tv1px Жыл бұрын
Double Decker buses - (direct to consumers because not sold in large quantities and consumers themselves are mostly transport companies or govt.) Washing Powder (wholesalers and retailers because large quantities and it isn't feasible to sell directly to millions of customers) Herbal remedies for dogs (I think, retailers suit here because the demand is low-intermediate. Note: I am assuming it's a food product. If this is a service then, directly to consumers is the best option)
@havenbastion Жыл бұрын
Ethics cannot be based on popularity but law must be.
@havenbastion Жыл бұрын
Morality is best understood as a personal understanding of best practices. Ethics is formalized and/or shared morality.
@Potencyfunction Жыл бұрын
Bye bye nice stakeholder
@tanatswatee3496 Жыл бұрын
Promisory estoppel please
@nathanielross295 Жыл бұрын
It is a dangerous thing to confuse The Law for morality. That is to say, The Law only determines what is lawful and unlawful, not what is right and wrong. It is dangerous because, for example, as The Law of the 1950’s said gay sex was unlawful and therefore caused Alan Turing to choose castration over the potential of undergoing popular Hate Crimes in prison, the Law of tomorrow can create new situations in which other innocent people are castrated or persecuted.
@emprezzlove1382 Жыл бұрын
Extremely helpful!
@hjboss09 Жыл бұрын
I need more help on criminal law , can anyone any other videos to help with my essay??
@MrTommyboi1987 Жыл бұрын
From the sounds of it still very helpful.
@MrTommyboi1987 Жыл бұрын
Right, I've tried to tried to DM you privately because I don't believe in public humiliation. However, at the start you said pacifically installed of specifically... I didnt hear the S and went back to check it defiantly was not in the audio.
@aidaphiloche7400 Жыл бұрын
Must consideration be the same amount as the offer ? For instance, I sell a bike to a friend for £100 but that friend can only pay me at the moment half of the price. Is there a contract that's enforceable in that case ? Thanks :)
@dalelerette206 Жыл бұрын
Economies should be built to keep people going. People are not here to keep the economy going. People drive the economy. Not the other way around. Economies should be built by people for the people - In memory of JFK. ❤
@mehmedkuc6249 Жыл бұрын
Here we go again with the DL tasks🙂
@warman155 Жыл бұрын
Thanks it helps alot
@StellaCori Жыл бұрын
Hey thank you, I never really understood this topic. Ty
@patriciadavidson7967 Жыл бұрын
very concise and useful👩❤️💋👩🧌
@FranxterP Жыл бұрын
thank you patricia, this lead me to watch this video with great intent 🧌🐿️🥜👑
@amoodyfrog Жыл бұрын
thank you!!
@cutpaperpaste Жыл бұрын
Is this American law
@emilya18435 ай бұрын
Uk
@chriscockman9437 Жыл бұрын
Just what I needed for my test tomorrow. Thank you!
@kanonymous6414 Жыл бұрын
In the first place partner parliament does not have supremacy over man. Man was given dominion by God in the Bible, evidenced by Genesis 1:26. Dominion being full control of the land, air, sea, And what creepeth up from below. In other words sovereignty was given to man, not just one man, but all man. Now, parliament only has supremacy over persons, which are legal fictions on paper only. Get your facts straight before you start teaching a bunch of shit. The facts are that I’ve been lied to my whole life., And now it’s time to call out the liars and the lies.
@kanonymous6414 Жыл бұрын
In the first place partner, parliament doesn’t have supremacy, the people were given dominion by God in genesis one 1:26. Dominion meaning full control of the land, air, and see, and what creepeth up from below. In other words sovereignty. What parliament has supremacy over is persons, which are legal fictions on paper, and not men and women.
@BROKEN-OC Жыл бұрын
Ur so boring
@jawata2733 Жыл бұрын
hey is there anyone who is studying Cambridge A2 law on 9084 , i really could use some notes to solve past papers.
@princetravis1148 Жыл бұрын
Good video for my test today on law and morality...thanks mate, haha. 😅
@rosee_xe2 жыл бұрын
we learn lean production without "minimising waste"
@leox42242 жыл бұрын
I will own a Franchise.
@dragonofnyte2 жыл бұрын
If you pay me I'll caption all of your videos so they aren't all ableist.
@ahmedanwar58942 жыл бұрын
❤
@taifahmed67132 жыл бұрын
Hey....enjoying it from Bangladesh. Take love❤️
@michellephillips36552 жыл бұрын
THE LAW is only Legal 'IF... And ONLY' IF IT'S "MORAL".. Its so so so simple. There's only 10 commandments to follow, so just follow them !!!. All the small print and legal B. S was only written by another (most likely) man accoto his privelladged life experiences and the influence of his also privaledged friends that have up to now always been from the same club that they produced.!!!!. So all you do is follow Good morals.