MAN! Life is strange baby, AND I LOVE IT!

A hole can't hold the Weight of the milky way,there's a small black matter moon compacting the matter with a big void around it .the last atoms go nuclear at the edge

AI is afraid of this guy

I'll stick with God as the meaning and purpose of the Universe

Planets r round cuz earth's flat, there's nothing to debate here, why's my floor flat if earth's round

After many years of watching Star Talk (and reading many of Dr. Tyson's books) this is the first time I've seen an episode that was in a completely foreign language. I couldn't make heads or tails of what was being said, other than a word (like proton) here or there. To say I was lost in space was a vast understatement. So no, this was one episode I didn't enjoy at all

It's hard to be empathetic towards someone's situation if you haven't been there yourself, so experiences are a big part of it.

Theres not one evidence of it every ripping and i honestly believe god would aquiant for molecules occupying the space instead of a "big rip"

The things I've already seen in my life definitely makes me believe in freewill

no, it's a single meaning quark :) - MESA, 2024

Gravity is its own field but it does quantum entanglement ....it is so uncondensed that it can warp space with lasers... They're just different fields that quantum entangle condensed enough to interact with with one another😂.... all stuff I've been working on in the past year I'll stuff I've talked about in the past year I can prove it and you know it.... we know this because there are electromagnetic fields the gravitational field could act the same way.. the electromagnetic field around the electron if you think about gravity acting the same way then you can condensed gravity and you can get anti-gravity which is just being able to control the condensity of the field in front of you ... We can actually see this with time and how things decay gravitons lose a little bits of it field over time because the pieces in the graviton are different condenses and over time some of them are lost and that's how things decay we can see this whenever one object gets close to another object we can see it's time slowed down and increase in volume of energy ... the only way It can be doing that is if one field of time is more condensed than another field of time but if you say they're the same density then you can say that one can't increase the other because the other couldn't pass through it but if you say gravity can pass through gravity and increase gravitational pull because gravity acts like a wall and then when you get closer to whatever is giving off gravity you become more condensed it becomes and then you can increase how much the gravitons energy has inside of it if certain other gravitational energy can pass through other gravitational energy condensing one or condensing both increasing the amount of time that's around it because the gravity in time will will pac more gravity into it until it pulls in more time

When a planet gets tidaly locked is it locked on the weakest half or the least mass half of the planet? And more masses faced away? Or does more mass face the planet? Or is it not matter at all?

Gravity is its own field but it does quantum entanglement ....it is so uncondensed that it can warp space with lasers... They're just different fields that quantum entangle condensed enough to interact with with one another😂

This thinking scares me because Pedos, rapists, and sociopathic murders. They can’t help it and we should include them into society doesn’t sit well with me. Are there limits to this thinking?

Love ur content thank u for keeping me curious! Since I was a kid I love to stargaze. When I was having a bad day or just time alone I looked up at the stars and made me realize how small I actually am and how I wish I could know all the answers good or bad. I always had curious mind. I have come a long way in my journey but can’t wait to learn more.

Free will probably exists because we have consciousness & experience qualia. Human brains could technically run calculations in complete darkness without any experience of consciousness. Yet there seems to be an evolutionary advantage where colours, sounds & various senses are presented to a decision maker. The perception of consciousness seems to indicate free will. Even if we don't have free will, we have no choice but to believe we have free will., since that's how we experience the world.

8:02 so why are there failed suicides smart guy.. u saying everybody who fails at suicide wasnt rlly committed? if so 1000% false

A need fight. Surprisingly entertaining. Nerd's man. Dudes is corny but it works

I'm sure Neil has told Chuck to cut the jokes down

You can’t cure cancer with drugs without other side effects. Sound and vibration type cures are the best way to cure cancer without side effects. But the medical and pharmaceutical companies will not pursue these treatments cause there’s no profits in the cure.

from what I see the game is rigged and I'm playing by the rules silly me😊

what exercises do Christians perform to check for their empathy

There are so many questions, obviously. I try with people around me but.... It's just me lol

Folks should make discoveries for the journey to discoveries & think like the explorer who explores for the sake of exploring.Otherwise,they are missing out.

mmmm there's a total confusion between determinism and fate here. No, your life is not nailed in a destiny but it's definitely determined! And no, there's no free will! I'll definitely go with Prof. Sapolsky on this one. His theory is so obvious that it's impossible not to see it - yet, people still act as if they don't see it! Incredible! To me it's incredible, especially when a scientist tries to find some situations in which he has free will and other he doesn't... that's odd to say the least.

😊

I'm blown away by the amount of free information that mainstream does not give us.

One busy elecron good show

When a concept of compassion equals telling people that have made bad choices that they couldn't have done better. BS

No one listens to black racists.😊

I think you have other things to worry about then your lights when you drive on the road at the speed of light

That was a running back not a quarterback…

That's my favourite show

The premise of Berserk. 🧐

We love our too many ads here on startalk

Wtf is going on in your brain, Ana? You know what who beat Hillary? Not who but what? So-called Progressive Outlets criticizing her. And now you are doing it to Joe Biden! Have you lost your everloving mind? Do you want another 4 years of Trump. The SCOTUS is now a kangaroo court thanks to Trump. Roe V. Wade is dust in the wind. Do you seriously think another Progressive Candidate can beat Trump? At least Biden is well known. And Trump and his hit squad will make up a huge scandal for anybody else. Use your brain! And here I thought you had half a brain. Hate to sound like an old lady, which is who I am, but smarten up! And fast! At least before you take down the Progressive candidate, and we have to suffer through 4 more years of Trump. I fear 4 more years of Trump more than my death.

Lets fill a box with a vacuum no matter how many times you fold this you won't ever find a limit. Why does the box crush itself? I'll tell you WHY__ Gravity gets stronger. Why should I fill a box with a vacuum. It's because 0 is still apart of the number line. Look at the state of matter differently. How easily can a solid move through water vs light. A solid can be thrown through and end up going completely straight through while light is throun left and right. In any relativity we find the speed limit of the universe. In diparametals the speed limit is twice of the speed of light in a vacuum. Thus in a triparametal we need to stop looking at speed from one point from one origin. diparametals are easily referencing diameter expansion from the center. We need to stop this we need speed on top of speed for linear acceleration. a marry go round on top of a marry go round. Engineering forces you to make each origin a smaller point having less mass. My question is: HOW Many Marry Go Rounds do we spin for "time" to Go backwards? Does an image doing this linearly just end up catching in a medium and eventualy disapating as it's polarity changes? which way does the light "bend"?

The idea that no facts or truths or understanding is thrown away in scientific progress, is a received wisdom, a kind of survivorship bias, that only makes sense when you're sitting in the moment, looking at existing understanding. Any historian of science, like Kuhn, can tell you that there are plenty of things thrown out. This doesn't necessarily mean they become false or not true, but they do become irrelevant and are ignored. Maxwell, Faraday, Hertz, Newton, all these men were driven by trying to find evidence of contact forces, newton considered the implication of his theory, of action at a distance an "absurdity". When Maxwell invented his field equations, he considered them to just be a mathematical description, he still kept looking for the contact medium. Faraday's discoveries of diamagnetism was all in search of the contact medium that carried the electromagnetic forces around. All in search of the ether. This understanding, and many of the facts that were relevant to it, have been completely tossed out by modern science. When you look back at newton from the point of view of a textbook, all you see is what survived, the pure mathematical description. You do not see that it was considered an absurdity and a return to "occult" forces, you do not see that Newton himself considered it to be a failure in large part, you do not see the thousands of observables that the scientific community thought to be more relevant then anything newton could predict with his theory at the time, which was actually very little. Asking a physicist to give a description of the progress and development of science, is like asking a plumber to give a description of the history of plumbing. There is no part of being a good plumber that requires you to have an understanding of the history of plumbing, and there's no part of being a good physicist that requires you to know about the history of physics. The problem comes in when physicists assume that being a good physicist means they understand the history of physics. Granted, great physicists, do often align with having a bigger perspective. For example, take Einstein, he recognised that that the scientific ideas we attached to observables were essentially completely free choices, and lamented that those physicists that did not realise this, often held back progress. Saying "The concepts and propositions get “meaning",” viz., “content,” only through their connection with sense-experiences…All concepts, even those which are closest to experience, are from the point of view of logic, freely chosen conventions, just as is the case with the concept of causality, with which the problematic concerned itself in the first place [referring to Hume]… The prejudice-which has by no means died out in the meantime-consists in the faith that facts by themselves can and should yield scientific knowledge without free conceptual construction. Such a misconception is possible only because one does not easily become aware of the free choice of such concepts, which, through verification and long usage, appear to be immediately connected with the empirical material" Scientific progress is in and of itself, the throwing out of facts considered relevant, and frameworks considered to be valid tests or goals.

Are dolphin farts actually the true breath of life?

So, if you certainly believe in the absence of free will, you must adhere to these two conclusions: that nobody is responsible for ANYTHING they do, despite WHATEVER conditions they are in, because the human experience is simply subject to the observation of predetermined processes that they have no ability to affect. Secondly, there must be no spectrum of good or evil, because nobody can choose between either. Nobody can be good or bad based on their behavior because they didn't decide in the first place. However, here is an argument I'm surprised was not presented. Given the scientific consensus on the age of the universe, that it is finite and at one point did not exist, AND all things have an antecedent (cause and effect), what catalyzed the existence of the universe? Whatever did must not have been confined by the laws of its creation. Thus, it was external, and existing before the origin of the universe. Furthermore, it can create laws that it is not subject to following. More over, because there must be a different set of "rules" in this external region, that supersede our boundaries of nature, it would be impossible to fathom its logical system whilst being bound to such confines. Now, because the definition of free will is to act without an influence that predetermines one decision, and the antecedent to the laws of nature are unbound by those influences, free will must not only exist, but not be explainable by our laws of nature. Furthermore, free will must not be tangible since is it unbound to the laws the constrict energy and matter. More over, it can be concluded that while our bodies are certainly composed of materials from within the universe, our ability to choose freely originates from outside our it.

What happens if time is a constant? What would go to infinity?

Wild

We live in a deterministic universe. Free will doesn't exist. This guy's whole theory is "free will of the gaps." Nothing there. We know that causality is true. That should be enough. The only reason uncertainty exists is that we don't have all the variables...duh. 🙄

Thats like saying "cars dont exist. We took one apart and they are just a bunch of mechanical parts working together as a unit. Evwn some electrical things going on. So cars dont exist." Gravitybexists even if it is composed of a bunch of quantum things.

Now tell us what a woman is

bro that was mercury not the moon

That’s nos even the real good question, what about… If you are in a car moving at 99,9% of light speed and you turn the headlights on, is the light coming out of the headlights going at 1.999 light speed ? Meaning light would be moving faster than light speed ?

Ive watched a couple of videos like this from intellectual people bout free will. However I wonder why they dont associate it with "consciousness". Certainly it has a big if not the biggest impact or relation to free will. 🧐🤔

32:30

Psychedelics are just an exceptional mental health breakthrough. It's quite fascinating how effective they are against depression and anxiety. Saved my life.