Speaking of tights, why did men stop wearing them? WTF happened that ONLY women ca wear tights now?

When I just got saved, I used a KJB, but then I realized I wasn't understanding anything. So I grabbed a dictionary, oh my surprise, the word did not exist in the dictionary... so I move on to an easier to understand version. Long live the king?

I'm a kjv only for English speakers

7.5.2024 Depeche Mode - People Are People (my cover version 😹) *_People are sheeple_* 🐑 *_So why should it be_* 🙁 *_You and I should gut the globe so easily_* 🌐🔨 *_People are sheeple_* 🐑🐑 *_So why should it be_* ☹ *_You and I should gut the globe so easily_* 🌐⛏ *_So we're indifferent to dollars_* 😐 *_And we're indifferent to greeds_* 🥱 *_And indifferent sheeple have different needs_* 💉 *_It's obvious you rate me_* 💯 *_Though I rewrote this song_* ✍ *_You're clever to have met me though you stuck to the globe_* 🤣 *_I can't understand_* 🤨 *_What brakes your brain_* 😄 *_Earth is flat get brain_* 😁 *_Can't you understand_* ❓ 🤭 *_People are sheeple_* 🐑🐑🐑 *_So why should it be_* 😒 *_You and I should gut the globe so easily_* 🌐🪚 *_People are sheeple_* 🐑🐑🐑🐑 *_So why should it be_* 😞 *_You and I should gut the globe so easily_* 🌐🪓 *_Can't you understand_* ❓ 🤭 *_(Can't you understand)_* *_can't you understand_* ❓❓ 🤭 *_Now you're preaching_* 😗 *_And you're pricking_* 😙 *_And you're doubting me_* 😚 *_I am 'dying' on your "common decency"_* 🤗 *_So far feat hasn't surfaced_* 😬 *_But I'm sure it exists_* 🙏 *_It just takes a smile to travel_* 😺 *_From ballhead to flat lists_* 😸 *_I can't understand_* 😕 *_What brakes your brain_* 😆 *_Earth is flat get brain_* 😂 *_Can't you understand_* ❓ 🤭 *_People are sheeple_* 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑 *_So why should it be_* 😔 *_You and I should gut the globe so easily_* 🌐🗡 *_People are sheeple_* 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑 *_So why should it be_* 😟 *_You and I should gut the globe so easily_* 🔪🌐 *_I can't understand_* 🤷‍♂ *_What brakes your brain_* 😀 *_Earth is flat get brain_* 😃 *_Can't you understand_* ❓ 🤭 *_I can't understand_* 🤷‍♂ *_What brakes your brain_* 😀 *_Earth is flat get brain_* 😃 *_Can't you understand_* ❓❓ 🤭 *_I can't understand_* 🤷‍♂ *_What brakes your brain_* 😀 *_Earth is flat get brain_* 😃 *_Can't you understand_* ❓❓❓ 🤭 *_(People are sheeple)_* *_I can't understand_* 🤷‍♂ *_What brakes your brain_* 😀 *_(Why should it be)_* *_earth is flat get brain_* 😃 *_Can't you understand_* ❓❓❓❓ 🤭 *_(People are sheeple)_* *_I can't understand_* 🤷‍♂ *_What brakes your brain_* 😀 *_(Why should it be)_* *_earth is flat get brain_* 😃 *_Can't you understand_* ❓❓❓❓❓ 🤭 *_(People are sheeple)_* *_I can't understand_* 🤷‍♂ *_What brakes your brain_* 😀 *_(Why should it be)_* *_earth is flat get brain_* 😃 *_Can't you understand_* ❓❓❓❓❓❓ 🤭

Excellent work on Galileo/Heliocentric observations and the trial! Thank you!

There was no Holy Roman Emperor between 1378 ( death of Charles IV ) and 1433 ( accession of Sigismund of Bohemia ) .

Hard to believe that next month, June, there will be some stores already selling items for Halloween

Excellent analysis.

Catholic Church: "Hey! Don't you be griftin' our grift!!"🫵

Thank you sir for all your contributions. (It may be just me, but when I get involved in a person's writings, art, etc., I like to get to know the person at least on a superficial level, like knowing Van Gogh, the painter. You have published info on your professional education and work, but I do not find you revealing anything about the person, particularly early life and what contributed to molding you as a developed mature man. ) During my USArmy Master Planning during the war in Kosovo in Germany, I was able to give friends a personal tour of Notre Dame in 1997 (I had majored in late 1970s in Architecture History, Preservation and Design in Achitecture School and my thesis was a critical analysis and comparison of Chartres and Notre Dame). I was terribly hurt to see it burning. Hollywood has never outdone European Theater of Romanesque, Gothic and Islamic Religious Architecture and fine art in it capturing and motivating/manipulating the human spirit and emotion. Personally I generally find Hollywood to be very weak, trite, boring, and low art, but like the religious architecture Hollywood art was devised to serve the very wealthy and the very poor, ignorant and weak minded. It's not for the strong minded, educated and independent thinker. Thanks again.

Please continue to produce videos for I have watched I believe everyone of your videos multiple times. More over, I have shared your videos with hundreds of people and use them in my own classes. I learned so much from you and I would so much like you to continue to do this.

Just wait until Christian’s and Jews find out that the stories of the Bible, written by the Old Testament writers, were plagiarized. The “god” of the Bible is actually the “evil” god of previous versions of the story. Christians and Jews are such sheep…

Flat earthers seems so sure about their dumb idea but they can't explain how a sunset work, that's just great. Re.ligions really fck people brain it's crazy There is so much religi.ons that exists but theirs must be right! Of course! On what fact? None, just faith.

Started it?.. I went to Duke on a TIP in 87, For me, Aside from Mathematical Anomalies and theories pushed as Facts… I realized there was no curve while surfing at 11, I could see Impossibly far Islands during the Dry Santa Ana conditions.. From there it was easy.. It is not as If I have Any Answers, Just the fact that there is No curve..The rest is speculation. (Infra red takes out the haze and eliminates a lot of refraction…try that?.. Lasers?..Levels?..Simple Math?, Gyroscopes?..Compasses..Just do it yourself and you WILL SEE.) People have popular theories but nobody has Facts.. The only fact is that you can not measure any curve. Seriously try yourself.. Don’t get caught up in the “but, what about/ etc”.. No curve means we have a Problem… No curve Also means you should perhaps think About God a bit more?

Pretty massive leap to assume Constantine, a Roman emperor, wasn’t mostly interested in jumping on the bandwagon to consolidate power. Especially since all the original Christian groups were murdered and their Scriptures destroyed. I’m doubting this was Divinely inspired in order to stamp out heresy”😂😂😂😂

You're soft peddling a lot of the characters in these movements. Parham, for example, was an avowed racist and segregationist that was a minister for the KKK, not just "odd" in his opinions. He used blacks to fill his audience because he was an opportunist. Though he did allow Seymour to attend his classes, he had to sit outside the class of all white students. After Seymour went on to the Azusa Street meetings, Parham denouced him mostly due to him holding integrated services. Parham did not believe in speaking in tongues in the way pentecostals do today, he believed, correctly (one of the few doctrines he got right), that tongues was the the miraculous gift from God of people speaking actual human languages unknown to them in order to communicate the gospel message to those that spoke that language. He even sent out English only speaking missionaries to China, Japan and India believing that God would give them the ability to speak the language of the natives. When this failed abysmally across the board, he changed his opinion to tongues being the unknown language of angles. He was also arrested for sodomy in San Antonio in 1907, he claimed to know where the Arc of the Covenant was, and raised tremendous funds for an expedition to Israel to retrieve it, which turned out, not surprisingly, to be fruitless, he said he had a machine that could turn rocks into gold and he claimed to be the latter coming of the prophet Elijah, among many other heresies, including denying the trinity.

Coming From A Family Pentecostal Background. I Went On To The Charismatic Movement With The Gift Of Tongues. Now I Am No Longer A Protestant Of The Re-Form-Mation Of Catholic Church Doctrine. So I No Longer Keep Catholic Saint Days Of, - Saint Valentine's Day, - Saint Patrick's Day, - Nor 'Easter' Of Yeshua Being 'the passover lamb' (Which Wasn't Meant For Taking Away Sin), - Or All Saints Day Of The Catholic Dead (Protestant Halloween), - Nor HO,HO,HO, Mary-Kris-Mass From Kris Kringle The Catholic Saint Nick. So Neither Am I Their Tithe Paying Trinitarian Anymore Either. Cutting The Strangling Apron Strings Of Their 'Mother Church' Sets Me Free From The Religious Agendas Of Men. ~

An interesting insight that Luther was not just a theologian but a politician and used politics to further his ends at the start of the Reformation as well as at the end

Message is the same whatever bible , people cause problems , the lord can’t be pleased with the 21st century. It’s as if Satan is winning the war. We have to be strong Christian’s to fight satans evil all over the earth

listening to this 21:13.....it just hit me.... Joh 14:16-17 Jesus says, "If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." God the Son, Himself, states God the Father will send the Spirit..... that me be irrelevant, but it came to mind like the flip of a switch and the light coming on.....

Wow, you are an excellent teacher. Thank you for posting this account.

They are gnostics.

الكنيسة الحقيقة هي الكنيسة الروسية الوحيدة التي لم تتغير

Pentecostal here who came to the movement through Catholic charismatics. Great video. Your balanced and fair analysis is greatly appreciated.

This Christianity does not sound very messianic, with all the violence generatedm

The roman icons are just idols.

😮

No, there is no excuse for Catholicism under the heaven, even less on its post schism tributaries... Bear in mind, the nails that the schism was hung on - the completely unbiblical precept of monastic living. Let that sink in.... So, when claiming to be orthodox, what precisely are they claiming to be Orthodox in precisely? The closest Catholicism ever came was the Reformation with Martin Luther, and even Lutheranism from a theological perspective, is not Christianity it's performed Catholicism. Folks need to take a theology class.

Very nicely done, subscribed. I knew a bit about Rowbotham, and I've leafed through _Zetetic Astronomy,_ but this added a great deal of fascinating background. I would agree that there are lots of modern flat Earthers who are not religious, but after years of chatting with thousands of them online, I get the feeling that most are inspired by what they think the Bible says about the shape of the Earth. What the authors of the Bible meant is of course a topic unto itself, one that I suspect has no good answer, because they obviously didn't draw a hard line between literal and figurative language. Thanks, looking forward to more videos. Cheers from sunny Vienna, Scott

look on your paper money government hides it right in front of us it shows the firmament jlk❤

Apostolic Pentecostals believe that the Spirit is Christ Romans 8:9

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on us and our world ☦ 🙏 🌍 🙏✝️

the orthodox are the successors of the jettisoned roman bureaucracy that were momentarily given pseudo-Catholic titles to allow Catholics to become acclimated to rome not being hostile. your earliest ancestors date from around the 300's, but your group didn't take off until bishops of constantinople wanted unquestioned power, convinced the emperor to ally with the m*hamm*d*ns to try to d*str*y The Church. they failed to d*str*y The Church, and the m*h*mm*d*ns w*ped out constantinople (using h*jra) for their f*ilure.

HEBREWS--4 12 Luke 19:40 21C Modern Era God's Fixed YEC His, Living Word Record In, Stone

Actually, flat earth was never a conspiracy. Everyone new it was flat...and stationary....for thousands of years. It's amazing what you can learn when you use your own God given brain and senses and do your own research. Stop believing the lies ! All experiments to prove the globe have failed. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH !

let's goo

*People making false claims that the King James Bible is somehow 'special' compared to other translations need to address the following* First, no way can anyone claim the King James Bible is the best or only ‘Holy’ Bible. There is no verse that tells me how God will preserve his word, so I can have no scriptural warrant for arguing that the King James has exclusive rights to the throne. The arguments must proceed on other bases. Second, the Greek text which stands behind the King James Bible is *demonstrably inferior* in certain places. The man who edited the text was a Roman Catholic priest and humanist named Erasmus.1 He was under pressure to get it to the press as soon as possible since (a) no edition of the Greek New Testament had yet been published, and (b) he had heard that Cardinal Ximenes and his associates were just about to publish an edition of the Greek New Testament and he was in a race to beat them. Consequently, his edition has been called the most poorly edited volume in all of literature! It is filled with hundreds of typographical errors which even Erasmus would acknowledge. Two places deserve special mention. In the last six verses of Revelation, Erasmus had no Greek manuscript (=MS) (he only used half a dozen, very late MSS for the whole New Testament any way). He was therefore forced to ‘back-translate’ the Latin into Greek and by so doing he created *seventeen* variants which have never been found in any other Greek MS of Revelation! He merely guessed at what the Greek might have been. Secondly, for 1 John 5:7-8, Erasmus followed the majority of MSS in reading “there are three witnesses in heaven, the Spirit and the water and the blood.” However, there was an uproar in some Roman Catholic circles because his text did not read “there are three witnesses in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit.” Erasmus said that he did not put that in the text because he found no Greek MSS which had that reading. This implicit challenge-viz., that if he found such a reading in any Greek MS, he would put it in his text-did not go unnoticed. In 1520, a scribe at Oxford named Roy made such a Greek MS (codex 61, now in Dublin). Erasmus’ third edition had the second reading because such a Greek MS was ‘made to order’ to fill the challenge! To date, only a handful of Greek MSS have been discovered which have the Trinitarian formula in 1 John 5:7-8, though none of them is demonstrably earlier than the sixteenth century. That is a very important point. It illustrates something quite significant with regard to the textual tradition which stands behind the King James. Probably most textual critics today fully embrace the doctrine of the Trinity (and, of course, all evangelical textual critics do). And most would like to see the Trinity explicitly taught in 1 John 5:7-8. But most reject this reading as an invention of some overly zealous scribe. The problem is that the King James Bible is filled with readings which have been created by overly zealous scribes! Very few of the distinctive King James readings are demonstrably ancient. And most textual critics just happen to embrace the reasonable proposition that the most ancient MSS tend to be more reliable since they stand closer to the date of the autographs. I myself would love to see many of the King James readings retained. The story of the woman caught in adultery (John 7:53-8:11) has always been a favorite of mine about the grace of our savior, Jesus Christ. That Jesus is called God in 1 Timothy 3:16 affirms my view of him. Cf. also John 3:13; 1 John 5:7-8, etc. But when the textual evidence shows me both that scribes had a strong tendency to add, rather than subtract, and that most of these additions are found in the more recent MSS, rather than the more ancient, I find it difficult to accept intellectually the very passages which I have always embraced emotionally. In other words, those scholars who seem to be excising many of your favorite passages from the New Testament are not doing so out of spite, but because such passages are not found in the better and more ancient MSS. It must be emphatically stressed, however, that this does not mean that the doctrines contained in those verses have been jeopardized. My belief in the deity of Christ, for example, does not live or die with 1 Timothy 3:16. In fact, it has been repeatedly affirmed that no doctrine of Scripture has been affected by these textual differences. If that is true, then the ‘King James only’ advocates might be crying wolf where none exists, rather than occupying themselves with the more important aspects of advancing the gospel.2 *Third, the King James Bible has undergone three revisions since its inception in 1611* incorporating more than 100,000 changes. *Which* King James Bible is inspired, therefore? Fourth, 300 words found in the KJV no longer bear the same meaning-e.g., “Suffer little children…to come unto me” (Matt 19:14). “Study to shew thyself approved unto God” (2 Tim 2:15). Should we really embrace a Bible as the best translation when it uses language that not only is not clearly understood any more, but in fact has been at times perverted and twisted?3 Fifth, the KJV includes one very definite error in translation, which even KJV advocates would admit. In Matthew 23:24 the KJV has ‘strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.’ But the Greek has ‘strain out a gnat and swallow a camel.’ In the least, this illustrates not only that no translation is infallible but also that scribal corruptions can and do take place-even in a volume which has been worked over by so many different hands (for the KJV was the product of a very large committee of over 50 scholars).4 Sixth, when the KJV was first published, it was heavily resisted for being too easy to understand! Some people revere it today because it is difficult to understand. I fear that part of their response is due to pride: they feel as though they are able to discern something that other, less spiritual folks cannot. Often 1 Corinthians 2:13-16 is quoted with reference to the KJV (to the effect that ‘you would understand it if you were spiritual’). Such a use of that text, however, is a gross distortion of the Scriptures. The words in the New Testament, the grammar, the style, etc.-in short, the language-comprised the common language of the first century. We do God a great disservice when we make the gospel more difficult to understand than he intended it. The reason unspiritual people do not understand the scriptures is because they have a volitional problem, not an intellectual problem (cf. 1 Cor. 2:14 where ‘receive,’ ‘welcome’ shows clearly that the thing which blocks understanding is the sinful will of man). Seventh, those who advocate that the KJV has exclusive rights to being called the Holy Bible are always, curiously, English-speaking people (*normally isolated Americans*). Yet, Martin Luther’s fine translation of the Bible into German predated the KJV by almost 100 years. Are we so arrogant to say that God has spoken only in English? And where there are substantial discrepancies between Luther’s Bible and the KJV (such as in 1 John 5:7-8), are we going to say that God has inspired both? Is he the author of lies? Our faith does not rest in a singular tradition, nor is it provincial. Vibrant, biblical Christianity must never unite itself with provincialism. Otherwise, missionary endeavor, among other things, would die. Eighth, again, let me repeat an earlier point: Most evangelicals-who embrace all the cardinal doctrines of the faith-prefer a different translation and textual basis than that found in the KJV. In fact, even the editors of the New Scofield Reference Bible (which is based on the KJV) prefer a different text/translation! Finally, though it is true that the modern translations ‘omit’ certain words and verses (or conversely, the KJV adds to the Word of God, depending on how you look at it), the issue is not black-or-white. In fact, the most recent edition of a Greek New Testament which is based on the majority of MSS, rather than the most ancient ones (and thus stands firmly behind the King James tradition), when compared to the standard Greek New Testament used in most modern translations, excises over six hundred and fifty words or phrases! Thus, it is not proper to suggest that only modern translations omit; the Greek text behind the KJV omits, too! The question, then, is not whether modern translations have deleted portions of the Word of God, but rather whether either the KJV or modern translations have altered the Word of God. I contend that the KJV has far more drastically altered the scriptures than have modern translations. Nevertheless, I repeat: most textual critics for the past two hundred and fifty years would say that no doctrine is affected by these changes. One can get saved reading the KJV and one can get saved reading the NIV, NASB, etc. I trust that this brief survey of reasons I have for thinking that the King James Bible is not the best available translation will not be discarded quickly. All of us have a tendency to make mountains out of molehills and then to set up fortresses in those ‘mountains.’ We often cling to things out of emotion, rather than out of true piety. And as such we do a great disservice to a dying world that is desperately in need of a clear, strong voice proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ. Soli Deo gloria!

Wicked and evil, brought up PAOC, we now have Joel Osteen, Kenneth Hagen, such heresy

These videos are amazing. Thank you for producing. As a Catholic I wish to unite with my Orthodox brothers and would support efforts to do so.

Pentecostals and charismatics are the worst heretic, hell-bound hypocrites on planet earth.

There is a wondefull book by Jeffrey Burton Russel: Inventing the flat earth. In this context: the estrangement of the past. By Anthony Kemp

Do you have a video on the early churches' understanding of spiritual gifts? If not that would be amazing. A series of Christian canonization would be great too. Thank you 🙇

Echolalalia. PSYCHIATRY: meaningless repetition of words just spoken by another person, occurring as a symptom of mental conditions. There are treatments for this. How rude I am.

I enjoyed your video, thanks for putting that together. I'm a space-systems architect, and have gotten pulled in a few times discussing and trying to counter Flat Earth believers, particularly West Point graduates. I personally know five West Pointers that believe in flat earth. Ironically, Buzz Aldrin, a West Pointer himself, gets very irritated with those people. I, myself, am a Naval Academy graduate, and would say it's impossible to become a Naval officer, understanding celestial navigation, to fall into the flat earth paradigm. There is one point in your video that I disagree with, which is a remark you made about young-earth. While I don't disagree that Rowbotham may have also had that view, the young-earth discussion is not tied to flat-earth. Discussion of physics, radioactive dating, carbon dating, how DNA works as an information system, disproving evolutionary claims, and other such topics, is a valid scientific discussion. But, again, thanks for your video.

Christ gave us a Pope not a Bible, and the Pope(Damasus 1) gave us the Bible with the help of some other Catholics-- and anyone who goes against the Catholic Church will not go to heaven.

Donald Trump sells indulgences in the form of gold tennis shoes. Buy the gold sneakers and get right with the Lord.

How can you even begin to compare your 7 and 9 year old of today who do nothing but stare at their dumbing down so called smart phone to either one of yester year who had nothing to do in their spare time but ponder on the wonders of life and physically investigate reality? That in itself demonstrates your inability to intelligently investigate reality.

Flat earth is the truth. The Biblical description of our world is right. The Big Bang and evolution are the same lies from the same liars. Christians have been fighting the heliocentric lie for hundreds if years. It is time to revive it and confront the lie of the moon landings.

" the bozos running the show at the time..." Okay, I subscribed. 🤌🏼

Christ prayed that his sheeps be one, we continue to see splintering of the Orthodox Church while the Roman Church remained one and in fact adding more to its fold various oriental churches and even the heretical Anglicans and Lutherans,