Not just yet - the 2024 alloy Spectral carries over the existing frame with 160/150mm of travel. We expect Canyon will update the alloy models at some point, but based on past experience it might not be until next year. [Wil]

Sounds like you should have a swing at some general maintenance 😁

За байком надо следить все-таки

I would love to hear your opinion on this too Wil You say lots of good things about the Trance Elite and how playful it is but I feel like COMPLETELY SUBJECTIVELY, you prefer the Levo SL for a lightweight eMTB

Good question - the Trance X E+ Elite is a great bike to compare with the Fluid VLT! I really enjoyed the handling and plush suspension of the Trance X E+ Elite, and found it to offer a smoother ride quality compared to the Fluid VLT. Both are quite poppy and playful, though I prefer the geometry on the Norco with its slacker head angle. To me it feels better balanced and more appropriate for the riding speeds you can achieve aboard a 20kg bike, and along with the big Float X2 and Lyrik, it is far more composed on bigger hits. In comparison, the Trance X E+ Elite doesn't feel as planted at high speed or as confident when pushing harder on technical descents. Of course you've got two different motor systems too. The full-powered SyncDrive Pro in the Giant provides more support with less rider effort required, though it does chew through the battery faster as a result. I ended up getting considerably more range with the Bosch SX system on the Fluid VLT. I also reckon the adaptive Tour+ and eMTB modes on the Bosch system are quite a bit more refined. As to which is more fun, I think it would depend on the terrain you're mostly riding. On flowier and less steep gradients, the Trance X E+ Elite is hard to beat. The chunkier and steeper the riding gets however, the better the Fluid VLT is. Hope that helps, but just yell out if you've got any more specific questions! [Wil]

Most of this was shot at the La Larr Ba Gauwa MTB Park in Harcourt, Victoria. Great spot to ride! [Wil]

Thanks Sandy! I suspect Norco will expand the Fluid VLT lineup with alloy models at some point in time, but maybe it'll be more from a price barrier-lowering perspective. Haven't had the chance to ride the new Rise though I believe we'll have one coming later this year. Looks like a great option! [Wil]

Actually the S2 size was spot-on! As mentioned in the review, it's a great fitting bike in terms of both reach and stack, and the cockpit fit me really well. The reference to climbing performance is primarily related to the 27.5in rear wheel and short chainstays. When combined with the perky Bosch motor and low-profile rear tyre, the Fluid VLT struggles for grip on loose and chunky climbs, and it requires more conscious front-end weighting compared to bikes with longer chainstays and dual 29in wheels. Going up to the S3 size likely wouldn't help a whole lot as the rear centre length is only 3mm longer. As for the cockpit, the stack lifts by almost 10mm and the reach increases to 472.5mm which is too long for me. There's a bit more info about sizing, setup and handling in the full review that you might find interesting; flowmountainbike.com/tests/2024-norco-fluid-vlt-review-c2-140/ Hope that helps! [Wil]

@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaq bigger bike and the saddle slid forward a tad. Straight up sorcery

That’s a great tip! Sliding the saddle forwards, dropping the stem down and even changing to a shorter stem are all useful techniques for tweaking the fit if you’ve got a bike that feels like it might be too big. I recently did all of those with the latest Canyon Spectral, which has a huge reach and stack for its given size. I was able to get it comfortable in terms of the seated position, but of course there’s not much you can do about the wheelbase and front centre length, and those are really the key elements when it comes to weight distribution and handling. For me that’s where the S2 size is spot-on with the Fluid VLT - I personally wouldn’t want that front centre any longer, as it handles so well! [Wil]

@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaq Norco's sizing is weird, the size recommended to me had a longer reach than I'm used to. it looks like a reach of a size Large, I usually ride around 450 reach which is norco's s2

Thanks for watching and for the feedback mate! If you're climbing at a lower cadence, the SX motor is pretty mellow in its power output, which helps to conserve the battery. It does depend on which assist mode you're in, with Eco and Tour being comparable to other low-powered motors. eMTB mode is more adaptive to cadence and input torque, so it feels similar to the Eco/Tour mode at lower cadences and if you're not putting a lot of your own energy into the pedals. When you start to push harder and a little faster, that's when you can feel the motor wake up and deliver significantly more power. Turbo mode will get you that feeling of power a lot faster and more easily. It isn't like the Turbo mode on the CX motor, but it still provides a lot of support even in the 70-80RPM cadence range. Personally I preferred the adaptive eMTB mode, as I find it to be more natural and easier to control when riding proper singletrack. In that mode, the SX motor feels considerably punchier and more responsive than other lightweight e-MTB motors when riding undulating terrain. During the standardised range test (10% average gradient) I found that I could cruise uphill pretty comfortably at 18km/h with the SX motor. This was quite a bit faster than comparable e-MTBs fitted with the Fazua Ride 60 (16km/h), the SL 1.1 (14.5km/h) and TQ (13.5km/h) motors. However, it was slower compared to the Bosch CX motor, which would comfortably tick over at 22km/h with even less effort on the pedals. That motor is really impressive if you're after an e-MTB that can carry you up every climb without you having to do a lot of work. Hope that helps, but just shout out if you've got any other questions! [Wil]

@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaq Hey Wil, thanks for this input. I wonder if you can compare the SX motor with the Fazua 60 in terms of pedaling support on lower cadence (70 RPM). Which one gives you more support? Thank you!

My pleasure mate! Good question on the Fazua Ride 60 - I'd really need both bikes side-by-side to offer an accurate comparison across the different assist modes with each system. But assuming we're talking about the most powerful setting, I found both motors to deliver a similar amount of support when pedalling at a low cadence up a steady road climb. As mentioned above however, the Bosch SX motor was able to maintain a higher average climbing speed (18 vs 16km/h) during the standardised range test. I must admit I wasn't measuring my cadence on that climb, but it would have been in the 70-80RPM zone. I'll have a more detailed review coming on the Bosch SX motor in the near future, so we'll be sure to put in plenty of comparisons to help benchmark it against the competition. With that in mind, let me know if you've got any other questions you'd like to see addressed in the review! [Wil]

It isn't adjustable in the app. With the bigger CX motor, it is possible for a Bosch dealer to disengage the Extended Boost function, though I'm not sure if the same can be done with the newer SX motor - I'll find out and get back to you! [Wil]

@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaq thanks!

How tall are you? I'm taking delivery of this bike tomorrow, and the Norco rep talked me into the recommended size, but it's massive on paper. 497mm reach on the S4, but I'm in the middle of the range at 182CM.

@@SwimmingBird846 I'm 190. Have always downsized bikes though. Usually ride 500 to 510 reach.

Thanks very much David, we really appreciate the feedback! [Wil]

agreed... I bought the Norco Sight A3 the same way - no better online reviews can be found. Love it here.

​​@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaqHi Will, i agree. Your reviews are fantastic and you are smart and good at bikes. Will how would one give the bike more rear travel? Obviously the front is just putting a 160 fox 36 on it. And if the travel could be bumped to 160/150, and with maxxis assegai front tyre and dhr II rear tire, would you then choose this bike over the levo?

@@mtb_3930 Cant increase the rear travel unless someone like cascade components makes a new linkage, the shock is max stroke length for the eye to eye size. (185 x 55)

We received a Heckler SL six months ago to test, but unfortunately the motor died within the first ride. It went back to Santa Cruz to have the problem diagnosed, but they're yet to send that bike back to us. Hopefully we can get on one in the near future to carry on the review! [Wil]

@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaq yeah that's common unfortunately with the early fazua drive units, I've had 2, this it's been strong, but out of both bikes the heckler SL and fluid the fazua is much better and more responsive in the lower cadences rather than the Bosch sx.

Sc heckler Definitely not the goat,fazua sux,pivot shuttle am much closer to goat status

@@user-tr8dl4fb3q lol, well you can debate that with AMB in there write up champ 😆

The Orbea Rise was the first to really nail this category.

No changes from the stock bike - we always weigh our test bikes without pedals and with all accessories removed so it's as consistent as possible between brands. Going tubeless will remove some weight from the bike, but it will depend on a couple of factors. For a start, some Canyon bikes come fitted with Tubolito TPU tubes, which are incredibly lightweight and even lighter than a tubeless setup. Also, it depends how much sealant you put inside each tyre. We always use 120ml for each tyre, which is pretty generous. With the Lux World Cup for example, that bike was lighter with the Tubolito inner tubes than it was setup tubeless. The last thing regarding claimed weights; there is of course always some variance in production, not just with Canyon's own frames but also with the parts that are fitted to it. Tyres are good examples of a part that can often vary in weight by quite a bit. Hope that helps explain! [Wil]

@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaq, Thanks for clarifying!

As mentioned in the video, we tested both the carbon and alloy version of the Trance X. Here's the review for the cheaper alloy model: flowmountainbike.com/tests/first-ride-review-2021-giant-trance-x-29-2/

Did you get a chance to check out the full review? There's quite a lot more info in there about sizing, which I reckon you'll find pretty useful: flowmountainbike.com/tests/2024-superior-exf-review-bosch-emtb/ Hope that helps! [Wil]

Thanks for watching and for the feedback mate! I think with the improvements on the new Epic EVO, it's the bike I'd personally choose out of the two. It is surprisingly capable thanks to the excellent geo and suspension, but it's still quite lightweight and efficient for longer distance XC riding. The current Stumpjumper will get you more travel, and the riding position is more relaxed and upright. If comfort is a priority, then you might want to swing towards the Stumpy for more compliance and a less aggressive riding position. Hope that helps! [Wil]

Yep! We've reviewed the GRIP SL damper in the new 32 Step-Cast fork here: flowmountainbike.com/tests/2025-fox-32-step-cast-review/ Hope that helps! [Wil]

@@FlowMountainBikeKZfaq will do, I’ll check it out. I’ll be out in Brisbane in September and might check out some trails while I’m out there🤟 🇺🇸✈️🇦🇺

Not sure either. Was your test bike set up tubeless or with inner tubes? [Wil]

Nino rides FA…fork and rear suspension. Just saw photos on FB. I hope they come out with a kit so I can upgrade my 23 Spark RC fork & shock.

​@@peterfreeman3317 You will be disappointed then. Scott are only selling the FA as part of a full bike (that has the modified frame to access the Scott specific FA shock) , currently with two models: SCOTT SPARK RC WORLD CUP EVO (EU) / SCOTT SPARK RC WORLD CUP (EU) that are listed but not available yet.