I only got about a third into this and couldn’t listen to that terrible AI voice anymore. It’s a shame because the material is very good.
@williamheyman543959 минут бұрын
I did not watch all of this. So I was in the US Army from private to colonel, and as a graduate of the National; War College, was a strategic planner. The question to be asked is, "If we go forward with this will we gain allies, or enemies." Napoleon did not understand, or care, and so as he went forth to conquer all of Europe, he gained many enemies, and the English defeated him at Waterloo. Hitler managed to make more enemies than allies. And although the citizens of communist countries would seem to be prime candidates for liberation, he managed to insure that they would be enemies against fascism. And today, the Russians want to subjugate the Ukrainians, as this were WWII. Now they have attracted more allies to the Ukraine. So they should stop this strategic plan, right? We will see. But history has shown that no error goes unpunished. One cannot do what one wants to do just because one wants to do it. Every action brings counter-action. So one must be sure of what one wants to do. And envision the future state.
@apennameandthata2017Сағат бұрын
It was not the most famous event of ww2, ffs.
@theuncomfortabletruth39282 сағат бұрын
Until July 1943, Germany had much more chances of winning against the Soviets (quality of troops, better leadership, natural resources, you name it). Then Kursk changed everything.
@germany4562 сағат бұрын
Stalingrad was so stupid, how did the high command let a whole army get captured, hitler was so stupid
@MD210373 сағат бұрын
The number of divisions Manstein requested and promised by Hitler were never available. Manstein had to go with what he had as time was becoming critical.
@germany4564 сағат бұрын
Funny thing how you wouldve thought berlin would have a big garrison but is Breslau or wrocraw had a better garrison
@germany4564 сағат бұрын
Ww2 was so crazy, how we left sooo many people behind, I would’ve left knowing I got abandoned
@josephwarra50435 сағат бұрын
"I was never a member of the n*zi party! I was only following orders! Why are you persecuting me?!!!"
@IndieVolken5 сағат бұрын
no mention of Berlin being divided up between 4 Western Allies ; mentions Americans near end of Video , but British and French zones too
@jlove77236 сағат бұрын
As I watch and hear the narration of this video I can't help to think that as a Peruvian living in the US for more than 43 years, I can honestly say, the Democratic party leftists are working on doing exactly the same thing they did in Russia to the USA.
@user-uy4iu9ro4d6 сағат бұрын
Расскажи как этот немец в 43-м году расстреливал при отступлении от Воронежа гражданское население Курской обл. Звери- это преступный гитлеровский ре 5:27
@user-uy4iu9ro4d6 сағат бұрын
Расскажи немец как ты расстрелл
@DdDongDd-0076 сағат бұрын
Joseph Stalin was a monster
@Macombdji7 сағат бұрын
THE FOLLOWING COMMENT SHOULD ALWAYS REMAIN AS THE NEWEST COMMENT : @oldmanjoe6808 2 months ago You didn't mention an important factor about bombing civilians... the ideology of war is that if there's an anti-aircraft battery on top of a hospital, school or house of worship, it becomes a target. Also, the Japanese were making war materials in their own homes in their cities. Such made their homes a viable target of war. If I was a civilian making bullets or mortars or what have you, I'm a target and so is my house which was an operating factory for the production of weapons to be used against America. Don't overlook as trifle the incendiary balloons they sent up into the atmosphere in Japan, carried by wind currents to the US, which dropped firebombs on our Pacific Northwest to burn down Ame
@jeffwalker94869 сағат бұрын
Creater of the Blitzkrieg
@ronaldfinkelstein63359 сағат бұрын
If Overlord had been a defeat, I think that the 509th Composite Group might have been deployed to Britain instead of Tinian, to plant mushroom clouds in Germany. Which was the original intention of the Manhattan Project.
@garrymacphee832810 сағат бұрын
The Germans fought the true fight. The British were forced to fight their brothers. Never again!!
@anthonycassata515210 сағат бұрын
So my question is why was there a disclaimer before the video started? There was nothing disturbing about this, it was history as crappy as it may have been. I was expecting some blurring of content.
@fox20006510 сағат бұрын
Such a shit pronunciation: "Hitlerdjudjend" :DDD
@reddisimmo12 сағат бұрын
Paulass thought of the national disgrace his surrender meant.
@carlrball13 сағат бұрын
Goebbels and Hitler had little or no knowledge of strategy and tactics.
@stavrosk.286814 сағат бұрын
Arrogance is Germany 's biggest problem. Always has been.
@MultiThucydides18 сағат бұрын
AI shit
@DanLetts9719 сағат бұрын
He went to war with the United States, Russia, and the British Empire. Do you really think he could’ve won war against those three giants?
@davidbanner623019 сағат бұрын
Because the worl was not ready to destroid as the Zazis would hvave done to it...........
@walthampton670019 сағат бұрын
AI voiceovers ruin it for me
@michaelwoolaver611321 сағат бұрын
arrogant
@JohnGruber-di3cw21 сағат бұрын
The Germans had many good generals but they had limited say over anything!!! Hitler called the shots & if any general argued or disagreed with him they'd be replaced or shot or both!!! So what did it really matter!!!
@user-oy3vn4cn7b21 сағат бұрын
Оболваненыи Народ Пропогандои Реиха!! Нынешние Зеркальное отражение России!!
@pretorious70022 сағат бұрын
The AI voiceover is really creepy.
@pretorious70023 сағат бұрын
What's the deal with the AI continuing the narration over the guy at the end? That's pretty weird.
@zuluoscarlima782223 сағат бұрын
It is absolute nonsense to record 28 million losses for the Red Army, without taking into account civilians. Yes, the Soviet Union made mistakes during the war, but this offensive myth about “meat assaults” or “one rifle for two” should not be supported. Yes, the author implies that casualities and fatalities are the same thing.
@jakerutherford338023 сағат бұрын
The truth is without American and British support, and without a huge number of cannon fodder to throw at the problem the Russians were ineffective and a garbage army. Yes they won in the end, yes they had battle hardened troops after a bit, but they enjoyed the numbers and land mass that could absorb huge losses. The lend lease act supplied 30% of all the war making capabilities for the Soviet Union. Also without their factories being designed and assisted in construction by American engineers in the 30s they would've never been able to move them. Lastly the Germans weee superior in every way on the battlefield except numbers. Period
@jesseherring474523 сағат бұрын
Long story short ,the German soldiers 1 to 1 were far better and only lost because of being so vastly outnumbered, during WW2, 1 German soldier was an estimated value of being worth 10 Russian soldiers
@jamescrydeman54023 сағат бұрын
Because you were lead by a nut bar and went along for the ride?
@kingsleyperera9655Күн бұрын
" ALL WARFARE IS BASED ON DECEPTION " (sun tzu) 5th century BC. === Remember during Vietnam war the false reports of body counts on vietcong / N.Vietnamese army casualties!
@richarddelgado2723Күн бұрын
If the movie 🎥 “Enemy at the gates” is to be believed too it looks like a lot of times the Soviets commanders purposely sent their soldiers into the German front line at Stalingrad in order for the Germans to use up all their ammunition 😮 They were told to run into machine gun fire 🔥 and they probably never even killed one German… And? If they retreated and ran back there were units set up on the other side that gunned them down for cowardice 🤦🏻♂️…..
@user-do3xr5tj8uКүн бұрын
Пусть Геббельс встанет в полный рост и покажет какой он коротышка
@jamesburke6078Күн бұрын
I'll leave you with this.....go look at Warsaw, most of Europe, good part of China...and dozens of other cities first before answering the question at hand
@dr.finnegan3949Күн бұрын
Thats because shitler left army group north to be cut off in the Courland pocket in the Baltics. So nothing remained to defend Germany and Berlim from the soviets.
@nrich5127Күн бұрын
There's one statement made that I disagree with - it said the Luftwaffe had a minimal effect on the landings - considering the amount of forces on both sides , the Luftwaffe's participation was as close to zero as you can get. 19 German FW 190 aircraft flew towards the Normandy coast. 11,590 Allied aircraft were available to support the landings. They flew 14,674 sorties and 127 were lost. That's a difference of about 10,000 to 1 or statistically zero.
@BrslldКүн бұрын
The German high command killed those men.
@alexmay2203Күн бұрын
Russians weren't fighting with Germans only. It was the third Reich which included every single country in the Europe excluding Jugoslavia. French troops defended Berlin till May 1945 for instance. AFAIK no European country gave official numbers on their casualties yet (not sure about Germans though). What we see on internet are just speculations.
@Storm-lg4mxКүн бұрын
Thank God that Rommel wasn't in command. Tanks and Men up Close and under cover.
@user-ni8hq2uv4uКүн бұрын
I heard he had wine and all kinds of goodies
@wfqsfgКүн бұрын
It doesn't matter how and when Germany was defeated. There was this thing that got finished in the US called an atom bomb. It was ready by summer 1945.
@LeonardGarcia-yn2ejКүн бұрын
My Favorite General Heinrici ; Thanks 🙏🏼 For Sharing; Your Site; W.A. ; Is A Go To For My History Fix 🎉😮 ; 5 Stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️❤ ; Take Care and Go Easy 🤗 . Len 🍀Long Beach Ca. 🌴🌊🧜♀️🐬💐🎊😮💨🌃🌌
@MD21037Күн бұрын
Barbarossa was doomed from the start no matter how you slice it. The only chance would've been if Germany had a full mobilized army which they did not, so it doesn't matter. They also had no strategic bombing capabilities.
@reapersdelight3033Күн бұрын
The Russians raped Berlin. The rape of Berlin was a disgusting set of war crimes