A Tale of Two Mosques & Two Prophets
10:34
God's End Game
1:16:53
3 жыл бұрын
Channel Introduction - Qur'anic Islam
22:25
Пікірлер
@kukish5992
@kukish5992 3 күн бұрын
Salam to all reasonable people, be careful with following middle men or letting them affect your Deen. You don't need middle men to understand the Qur'an which Allah made easy to understand. The Qur'an complete and fully detailed.
@yaqoobmuhammad9766
@yaqoobmuhammad9766 3 күн бұрын
MashaAllah bro good information thank you
@perfectdawah4535
@perfectdawah4535 4 күн бұрын
@QuranicIslam Salam alaikom brother Khalid. I will be waiting for you tonight inshallah. Please let me know if you have received this message. 🙏🏻❤️
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 4 күн бұрын
Yes I have received your message and will be there inshallah
@amrasamardzic6091
@amrasamardzic6091 8 күн бұрын
Selam. What is your view on this ayat: Al-Ahzab 40. Muḥammad is not the father of [any] one of your men, but [he is] the Messenger of Allāh and seal [i.e., last] of the prophets. And ever is Allāh, of all things, Knowing. Some people say that there is difference beatween messenger and prophet and that ayat Show that Muhammad Was Last messenger that means Qur'an is last book from God. But he is not last prophet and that prophets will come until the last Day to warn people about deviations from the Kur'an.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 6 күн бұрын
@@amrasamardzic6091 There's a difference of course, but there are no Messengers who are not also Prophets. If there were going to be another Messenger after Muhammad the Qur'an would provide a prophecy. Every Prophet & Messenger prophecized of the one to come next. Here we are told Muhammad has no male children bc there are to be no more Prophets OR Messengers, since they descend one from the other. The Israelite line ended with Jesus, the Ishmealite line ended with Muhammad. Neither had male children for that very reason
@amrasamardzic6091
@amrasamardzic6091 6 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam Claim is that prophecies in the Quran is that God's Messenger of the Covenant will be sent after all the prophets have come to this world, and after all of God's scriptures have been delivered. God took a covenant from the prophets, saying, "After I have given you the scripture and wisdom, a messenger will come to confirm what you have. You shall believe in him and support him." He said, "Do you agree with this, and pledge to uphold this covenant?" They said, "We agree." He said, "You have thus borne witness, and I am with you a witness." (3:81) From Sura 33 that Muhammad was one of the prophets who made that solemn covenant with God. And when we exacted a covenant from the Prophets, and from thee (O Muhammad) and from Noah and Abraham and Moses and Jesus son of Mary, We took from them a solemn covenant.(33:7) The mission of God's Messenger of the Covenant is to confirm existing scriptures, purify them, and consolidate them into one divine message. The Quran states that such a messenger is charged with restoring God's message to its pristine purity, to lead the righteous believers-Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus, and others-out of darkness into the light (5:19 and 65:11). A messenger of God must present proof that he is God's messenger. Every messenger of God is supported by incontrovertible divine signs proving that he is authorized by the Almighty to deliver His messages. Moses threw down his staff and it turned into a serpent, Jesus healed the leprous and revived the dead by God's leave, Sãleh's sign was the famous camel, Abraham walked out of the fire, and Muhammad's miracle was the Quran (29:50-51). This is the claim.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 4 күн бұрын
I've never understood the relevance of that verse to the claim. It seems as if it is an outgrowth of the traditional tafsir that the verse is about the Prophet Muhammad and how that every Prophet was told that if he was sent in their time then they would have to follow him. So "a Messenger" in the verse becomes "THE Messenger", meaning Muhammad. And for the followers of Rashad Khalifa it is him But the verse is about "a Messenger", ie any Messenger. So any Messenger sent during the time of any Prophet, then that Prophet would have to support him. That's all that verse is saying. It doesn't mean that there is one unquie "Messenger of the covenant" who will come after all other Prophets. How could those Prophets support him if he came after their time? Why would God take a covenant upon them to do so? It is silly Q33:7 is irrelevant to that other verse though. The mithaq is different from an 'ahd. I just don't see any such indications of some future Messenger who will do all of that. It all just seems contrived. There is nothing to purify really. The truth and falsehood are distinct, not mixed. And it has never been God's intention to do away with falsehoods, but to Allah them and let them be so as to see who will accept them and be drawn to them, and who will resist them and recognize them. Hence the Prophet Muhammad was commanded to let the forgerers and their forgeries be.
@amrasamardzic6091
@amrasamardzic6091 4 күн бұрын
@QuranicIslam Allah knows the best but i dont really see anything wrong with Rashads message affcourse 2 ayats removed from Qur'an Was shock to me, but when i see his explanation and when Look historical background about this 2 ayats i see logic behind it. His Theory actually Support claim that Qur'an is preserved because if there is Law you cant know how that Law Works until someone try to Break it. I dont agree with claim that there is nothing to purify because we see how people are divided because hadiths and every person have his own Interpretation that all is solved if there is messenger. If his translation is correct for example; When God ALONE is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not believe in the Hereafter shrink with aversion. But when others are mentioned beside Him, they rejoice.39:45 The expression "When God, the One and Only, is mentioned,” is not the same as saying, "When God alone is mentioned.” One can mention "God, the One and Only,” and also mention Muhammad or Jesus, and no one will be upset. But if "God ALONE is mentioned,” you cannot mention anyone else, and a lot of people - those who idolize Muhammad or Jesus - will be upset. This Shows that actually hadiths above Qur'an has maked people idolize Muhamed a.s without even noticed adding him in prayer and in call to prayer and making caligraphy with his Name next to GOD. This clearly Shows that prophet would never order such Thing because every prophet who lived only called to GOD ALONE. That why no one can accept for example shadah only with La ilahe ilallah even if GOD Say in Qur'an : 3:18] GOD bears witness that there is no god except He, and so do the angels and those who possess knowledge. Truthfully and equitably, He is the absolute god; there is no god but He, the Almighty, Most Wise. This ocurs over 30 times in Qur'an and other part ocurs only one time and God call them hypocrites. 63:1] When the hypocrites come to you they say, “We bear witness that you are the messenger of GOD.” GOD knows that you are His messenger, and GOD bears witness that the hypocrites are liars. Than is not strange that Muhamed will on Day of Judgment say that his people abounded Qur'an. Muslims are very sharp when it comes to criticaly Look to Christians and others but they dont see own mistakes. One more example of Ahmed Deedat who suported claim of Rashad about Code 19 but later when he said He was messenger of God then rejected all even the fact that this Code actually works.
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77 9 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 9 күн бұрын
Some views constructed out of your explanations of kufr and shukr: It seems that narcissists are the ones who become Kafir (ungrateful) or do Kufr (ingratitude) of Divine messages. As narcissists believe that only they are right, others are wrong, because narcissists are extremely arrogant and they think that others should follow their world view, if someone gently tries to direct the narcissist's attention towards the wrong or incorrect things he believes in, the narcissist's ego gets hurt. He, then begins to think "How can I be wrong? I can never be wrong!" Then he begins to emotionally manipulate the people by reminding them of the favours he did to them, in order to make them question their own doubts and criticisms they have made about him. The narcissist wants people to believe in whatever he preaches, and obey him without questioning his authority. So if a kafir is indeed a narcissist, what would he do if he sees Divine revelations ordering justice and equality to prevail in society? That everyone is equal regardless of skin color, ethnicity, tribe, race, language etc, he sees Divine texts ordering people not to be unjust, arrogant, oppressive, boastful, filled with pride, and not to look down upon each other. The opposite of a narcissist would be someone who is humble, soft hearted person, that should make him a shakir, (grateful) the one who does 'shukr' (gratitude) if he is exposed to Divine message, he is expected to be the opposite of the kafir, since he will be having traits of humility, humbleness, soft heart, openness to other opinions, openness to criticisms, he would not have prejudice against anyone. His heart would be filled with love and compassion, so if he is exposed to Divine revelations, he would definitely accept the message as it is in harmony with human nature, because it commands him towards righteousness, love and compassion for everyone, a shakir then is someone who doesn't believe that he knows everything, he also doesn't have intellectual arrogance, he believes that he can also be wrong and others can be right too, and that is what makes him open to other people's views. So it seems the kafir who is a narcissist would respond to Divine messages with great arrogance and hostility as he sees it challenging his authoritative nature towards others, he can be someone who is already a believer in God, because he may have had faith in previous messengers, only because he got to change the words of God His commands that were given through Prophets and messengers after they departed from this world in favour of his own. If he really had followed the previous Prophet, it was probably because the Prophet belonged to his race or tribe, this wasn't really submission out of faith, because he had already developed a disease in his heart. So if we are to think what was the case with the kuffar (plural of kafir) of pagan Arabia? In pagan Arabia, those who had such disease of arrogance in their hearts wanted dominance over the people of Mecca, So they made stone and wooden idols with their own hands, they made sure that the people have established their belief in those gods and goddesses, because they understood human psyche. How the human being is desperate for the glimpse of something otherworldly or anything that resembles it, especially the Divine. So the creation of stone and wooden idols which had otherworldly and powerful appearences seemed pretty much closer to the Divine, because they must have looked like mini gods and goddeses who were given power by that one supreme God, and are His sons and daughters. Attracted by those idols, the Arabs in Mecca began to believe in them, the creators of those idols lied to the Arabs by false promises of their wishes being fulfilled by these gods and goddeses if they obey what they have asked for. So they would tell the Arabs "This goddess has commanded you to bury one of your daughters alive. If you do that, she'll get instant salvation!" And people begin to obey that command blindly without any use of intellect and reason, being in complete servitude to those people's evil commands not realising that the commands that were given were not from any of those idols as they are lifeless, it was rather for selfish motive of decreasing women's population in society, and the people are in Ibadah or servitude to that command thinking they are doing something great and holy. So the Arabs had become the 'Abd' which means servant, of those people. So Ibadah means servitude, not worship. And Ibadah to God alone means being a servant of God only, without sharing any servitude to others. So shirk is servitude to others along with God, not polytheism. As lifeless objects cannot command you to do anything. Rather, polytheism was just a medium towards shirk at that time, as a well known example can be given is the well known personality, Amr Ibn Hisham, who was given the title 'Abu Jahl' (Father of ignorance) by the Prophet. He was the leader of the polytheists as people were in Ibadah to him through those mini gods and goddesses, blindly following his commands.
@zarakhan8853
@zarakhan8853 9 күн бұрын
Just wanna say your efforts have absolutely been fruitful. I found your videos in March of this year. At that point, I wasn't fully a Quran only muslim, I was a muslim coming back to Islam after a long time of it being absent from my life. As I was reading the Quran I was confused because the translation I was reading (Arthur Arberrys) was different from the one I had read in my parents' home growing up (no parentheses adding additional meanings to the text, confusing annotations etc). I dug around and came across your channel and it really helped solidify my beliefs and gave me confidence as a non arabic speaker that the Quran only path was the right path.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 9 күн бұрын
@@zarakhan8853 👍 thank you for this and God bless you
@Lightbulb909
@Lightbulb909 9 күн бұрын
Highly recommend you learn Arabic. It’ll give you a more nuanced understanding of the Quran because just one Arabic verb carries many meanings. I began knowing very little, but I continually used Lane’s lexicon and read the rules of grammar to understand better and better.
@perfectdawah4535
@perfectdawah4535 10 күн бұрын
Salam alaikom brother Khalid. My comments get deleted by KZfaq. I need to ask you if you can join me this Saturday to talk about 5:38? Please let me know 🙏🏻.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 9 күн бұрын
Salaam ... I don't know why that is. How many comments were deleted before this one? Inshallah I will be there
@perfectdawah4535
@perfectdawah4535 9 күн бұрын
@QuranicIslam it is KZfaq that deletes them. I did put one comment on Friday, which had been deleted when I checked it yesterday. Then again, I did put several more, and they also got deleted immediately. Anyway I happy that you so this comment, and you responded. Inshallah, I'll be waiting to talk to you this Saturday. 🙏🏻
@perfectdawah4535
@perfectdawah4535 5 күн бұрын
@QuranicIslam Salam alaikom brother Khalid. I will be waiting for you tonight inshallah. Please let me know if you have received this message. 🙏🏻❤️
@republicofjupiter
@republicofjupiter 10 күн бұрын
Hi. Peace be upon you. Hope you and your family are well? I have a question. Female cheating is punished by 80 lashes but nothing is mentioned if a man cheats on his wife. Does that mean God doesn't really care that much about husbands betraying wives? What does God think? Thank you for this new great video, I always learn a lot from them. God bless you and your family. 😊
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 10 күн бұрын
@@republicofjupiter You are reading it very very wrong. The 80 lashes punishment is for anyone who accuses a married woman of cheating (zina) without providing the necessary evidence. As for zina itself, its punishment is 100 lashes for both the man and woman involved. So no, there's never a case where a woman is punished for zina but a man is not Maybe I will do the next stream about zina and its punishment bc for some reason I've been having a lot of questions on it lately.
@republicofjupiter
@republicofjupiter 10 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam oh sorry my bad. I've been reading reddit posts about this just now. What I meant was that the woman gets punished for infidelity and her secret lover too for being involved with a married woman but what about a married man cheating on his own wife? Is there a punishment for a cheating husband or God doesn't really pay much attention to husbands betraying their wives? Thanks 😊
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 10 күн бұрын
@@republicofjupiter Put that way, God doesn't care about the "cheating" of either. God cares about family lineage and everyone involved in that family; brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, grand parents, cousins, etc All not being deceived about a relative who isn't really there's, and thus false inheritance, etc. And the integrity of that all depends on a wife not cheating. Her betrayal, and the man involved with her, is far greater sin than husband. A husband can't cuck his wife. She knows that the child that issues from her body is hers. Edit: but that doesn't mean God doesn't care. It just means that for a functioning society & its protection, only zina has a punishment. The others are still indecencies & fahisha and have their punishments in the next life ... where every atom's weight of good/bad will be seen and accounted for
@republicofjupiter
@republicofjupiter 10 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam right I see the reasoning now. Thanks for replying to my comments 👍
@mvvx313
@mvvx313 11 күн бұрын
‎السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركات ، i wanted to ask about two matters that have been bothering me lately, Allah’s favouritism of men and shubuhat about some 7th century figures - in particular Aisha which i’ve seen another brother skepticism about I can’t help but think that Allah loves and favours men - there’s nothing that has disproved this thought of mine which i’m ashamed of even thinking about it like this but i can’t help it when nowhere in the Quran God directly addresses believing women, the only time he does is when it comes to the mothers of the believers and that’s to reassure them of a magnificent reward in the hereafter if they do good, why couldn’t he address all believing women, is it because we are not married to his most beloved male servant like they were, moreover men are always mentioned first when it comes to about the promise of what’s in jannah and the specific reward of houris that Allah wants them so badly to be aware of. i’ve seen arguments in defence that it’s a reminder for them as a means of motivation but aren’t women more in need of it? especially when they make the majority of the inhabitants of hellfire? women take precedence only in negative ayas - like 24:2 & 24:26. To not forget about the countless hadiths where the mercy sent to the worlds degrades & speaks negatively of women, the many restrictions imposed on us so his male servants are protected, a woman’s salvation being entirely based on her obedience to her husband instead of her relationship with Allah to the extent she can give up fasting, voluntary prayers and other good deeds just for his pleasure just for her to share him with another earthly woman & 72 virgin maidens, a man being able to engage in polygamy without having the need to consult his first wife, polygamy being allowed by scholars for all reasons and in all circumstances when God only gave the condition “If you fear you cannot act fairly towards the orphans..”, physical discipline which even the tooth stick theory doesn’t justify as women shouldn’t be even touched lightly To back this up, the misogyny that muslimahs have been facing since foerever from muslim men proves that Islam taught me this & this religion isn’t in favour of us like many claim. Surely, islam did introduce some rights in Hejaz like the end of killing infant girls, inheritance rights.. but these are basic human rights which every person is entitled to - nothing revolutionary especially in our time
@mvvx313
@mvvx313 11 күн бұрын
Regarding Aisha رضي الله عنها, i’ve been having some doubts after having been exposed to some riwayat like adult suckling, causing the first fitnah, her dislike for Fatima رضي الله عنها and her husband and craftiness. I’ve dug deeper into researches about her and i came to the conclusion that most of the fabricated stories that venerate her is due to salafis extremism in regards to her. Like the prophet’s undying love for her (which i used to use as an argument when discussing with shias which i don’t believe in anymore) to the extent he wanted to die with her instead of his daughter who’s soon was going to loose her only alive parent, naming her first when asked who’s the most beloved person to him even though this would also cause him to be unjust towards his other wives. I like her but i feel guilty for not having the same defensiveness that i used to for her. May Allah help me with these shubuhat
@JustToW9
@JustToW9 13 күн бұрын
Hey man, i just wanted to Ask a question about Aisha May God be pleased her. You know i have heard in the quran that the the wfe or Nuh and Lut were exemples of unrighteousness and evil. I have looked into the battle of camel and she was very involved in the opposing side and is responsible for the thousands killed in the battle. I became sceptical because people say that she made a mistake and that the prophet predicted this would happen. But what I’m wondering is some say that she is innocent of the result which in my understanding I found ridiculous and unjust because thousands of people died. Anyways I choose to be neutral though I do think it was wrong of her to rebel against Ali but still think Ali forgave her and sent her back safety. I do think shias actually have some points when it comes to history, but I find it silly to defend someone when it comes to war and casualties.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 13 күн бұрын
@@JustToW9 I agree with that. Though I wouldn't say Ali "forgave" her in terms of him even having the right to "forgive" her. What she did was a crime against the Ummah, people died. Her accounting is with Allah & the people who died. That's where her forgiveness would be. Ali honored her and returned her to Madina bc that is the correct course of action with a civil war or civil strife. There is no retribution. For his own self he was of course very forgiving & gracious, but let's be careful not to mix that up with the state affair. Ultimately it seems clear she acted due to very bad intentions; ambition for Talha, dislike of Ali, hypocracy, etc. And had she not rebelled, Mu'awiya would likely have been dealt with.
@JustToW9
@JustToW9 13 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam yeah I know, but would you say that anyone who rebelled against abu bakr umar and Uthman would be a kaafir, I understand that the salafis have a hard time understanding between good and bad people. Though I have heard that Muwaiya is behind Umars death I do think that the first 3 caliphs were used by the munafiqeen. Though I find the ummayd rulers worse then them. I heard you say that Abu bakr umar and Uthman sidelined the Ansar. Eventually Uthman placed the some hypocrites in high positions including Muwaiya. But was it right for the muslims to rebel against Uthman? If they hated him this bad.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 13 күн бұрын
@@JustToW9 It wasn't a rebellion so much as it was a revolution against Uthman. And it would have been one of the best in history were it not for the fact that it ended with the killing of Uthman. Once it was clear he wouldn't step down, he should have been forcibly deposed by simply electing a new Caliph and everyone giving bay'ah to him and ignoring Uthman completely. Or that's my take anyway if what could have been done. But it was a great revolution against injustice
@JustToW9
@JustToW9 13 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam understood. Would exiling Uthman been the better solution? Also why did he sideline the ansar? Was it out of favour for his relatives or favour because of power. I think we shouldn’t make assumptions about their intentions but I honestly think Uthman practically ruined the rasidun caliphate due to his own family members actions. Edit: Umar and Abu bakr sidelined the Ansar too. Though Umars reign lasted longer then Abu bakrs. Was it Umar who conquered Egypt and tore the contract against their people or was it Amr ibn Al as? Though his influence played a big role in the first fitna. What do you think of Talha and zubair? did they flee from the battle? Why do the shias attack and criticise them. All I heard was that Zubair fled the battle and talha was shot from behind from Marwan. Khalid this sort of history isn’t shown by the present generation of scholars. I also think people who share this sort of historical narrations makes us believe that current generation will never understood that some part of history is rewritten for their leaders and governers.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 12 күн бұрын
It would certainly be covered by the verse about exiling those who spread corription in the land. Because the Ansaar were pro-Banu Hashim, especially Khazraj. It wasn't just him, it started with Abu Bakr and Umar who favoured Quraysh and Thaqif, which was the old Jahiliya alliance that they had. Uthman then cut out Thaqif and the rest of Quraysh and put Banu Ummayah upon everyone. The only one to bring back the Ansaar was Ali. It was as if people like Abu Ayyub alAnsari had come back from the dead. Suddenly you start seeing their names again in history. No, it was 'Amr bin al-'Aas in Umar's time ... so he does bear some responsibility It is difficult to know for sure how much are narrations created to redeem Zubair and how much is true. Whether he left bc Ali had reminded him that they Prophet had told him that he would fight 'Ali unjustly, or it that is just made up for his sake. Zubayr was corrupted by his son 'Abdullah and his jeaously of Banu Hashim and dislike that his father was "under them" as he saw it. His ambition would later lead him to not supporting Hussain too. Talha was likely worse off than Zubayr, and yes he was killed by Uthamn. He certainly never repented of breaking his oath. Both Talha and Zubayr gave bay'ah to Ali of course, freely without coercion. Talha and 'Aisha were the main instigators against Uthman. Yes, true. Hopefully one day more critical histories are popularly shared
@amrasamardzic6091
@amrasamardzic6091 16 күн бұрын
Why we just dont Filter all practices through Qur'an and problem is solved. Problem with Tradition is if you Pick sides then you can easy make more wrong things because then we Pick sides beatween companions. We dont need to do that, because hadith is only conjecture that someone said that some companion said something. When Buhari Was alive how many companions of Prophet Muhamed was alive? None!
@justsomeone8899
@justsomeone8899 19 күн бұрын
Please help brother, I've been very skeptical of islam lately after watching some ex muslims videos, not talking about those fake ex muslims but real ones like Abdullah Sameer, he says he had been devoted muslim earlier in his life he even had made Islamic websites so it really makes me tensed to think why a muslim after so much research would leave the religion. I know this is a lazy question and I should research about all the objections these ex muslims make myself, I want to extensively research on Islam in general as well but I'm afraid what if there came nothing out of it? What if I arrived at the conclusion that Islam is false? All that time and efforts I would be in learning arabic and Islam would go to waste, it's not only about time and efforts but my feelings too, I think I would get very much attached to the religion by researching more and more and it would be heartbreaking if in the end I conclude it doesn't make sense, do you have any advice for me?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 18 күн бұрын
@@justsomeone8899 You should be critical of the Islam you know. Islam is no different to any other religion in that it has been corrupted. You believe Judaism isn't the real Judaism of Moses, and Christianity isn't the real Christianity of Jesus ... why do you think "Islam" is the real Islam of Muhammad & the Qur'an? Especially since you know the Prophet himself said that this Ummah would follow in the same path of the Jews & Christians? Be grateful! Be thankful! This is actually an opportunity for you to awaken unto God's Islam. Not many Muslims actually get to that place where they can give up enough falsehood to make room for truth. Just be blazingly sincere, very very patient (God can wait for you to figure things out, He's in no hurry) yet put in some real effort Even if you see "Islam" as false, keep that oath upon yourself to be burningly honest & sincere. Honesty attracts truth. And what would you want with a God who doesn't reward honesty? Your faith in the Qur'an should be higher than your faith in "Islam", and your faith in God should be higher than your faith in the Qur'an I obviously have a lot on my channel that I think will help. Maybe the best would be my video essay "Qur'anic Islam vs Inherited Islam"
@mominameraj5778
@mominameraj5778 21 күн бұрын
Assalamualaikum 💫 I have been watching your videos since about 6 years now, since I was 16. Keep up the amazing work dear brother. Thank you for this video, very astound presentation. Also, I love the way you read the verses, a gentle yet firm tone. I really appreciated the point that ‘what power is being talked about’. Generally the main purpose of guidance goes out of the window or takes a back seat when discussing these issues. But genuinely, what power are they talking about? Political and legislative powers? Another question, when people say that the Prophet interpreted the Quran, I suppose they are referring to the situation which arose during that time and the manner in which he applied the Quranic rules… like cutting the hand of the thief in some cases of theft and not in some other minor cases. This is the example Dr Brown goes on to give in this interview. So they would make a case that learning the way the Prophet peace be on him applied the verses is necessary for our understanding and application of the Quranic rules. My understanding is, knowing that would definitely help but God by his favour would guide every sincere believer to make the right decision even if they do not know what the Prophet did in a similar situation.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 14 күн бұрын
Thank you It is just sophistry ... there's no actual power. The cutting off of the hand i'll speak about in the next part ... when i get round to it! But most of the Qur'an doesn't have verses that require or need or even can be explainined/interpreted in that way they say But yes of course, knowing how the Prophet acted or behaved would always be great whether or not it is directly linked to interpreting a verse of the Qur'an Part of this world's test is to be able to find that guidance of which you speak
@mominameraj5778
@mominameraj5778 14 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam Thank you! Would love to listen to the next part. Peace be with you
@kukish5992
@kukish5992 21 күн бұрын
Salam. Besides that you don't reject hadiths (aren't you part of the Quranist sect?), besides that you're telling people in comments that the deeds of an atheist who turned away from the Truth have weight on the scales on the Judgement Day, besides that according to you it's actually good to break divine commandments and sequence decreed by God for the overall rituals of the ‘Umrah and the Hajj , i think you may have made other errors in your video.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 14 күн бұрын
I don't reject all hadiths bc i think it is illogical to do so, but I still maintain that the Qur'an on its own is more than enough for guidance. Denying that is much more so kufr than rejecting all hadiths, which isn't kufr at all. Yes, an atheist will be judged according to their deeds, same as anyone else. No, i did say an atheist "who turns away from the Truth", but yes even that is true and depands on what you what is being turned away from. No, I never said it is good to break divine commands. There is no sequence described by God for salat, but there are some sequences for Hajj So none of these are errors and some of them are your own misunderstandings
@kukish5992
@kukish5992 3 күн бұрын
​@@QuranicIslam Haha, your arrogance in claiming others' misunderstandings of Qur'an and Islam is so funny. Aren't you sectant? I'd bet you are. Anyway you're not the first one like this on youtube, i've seen many Quranists who claim they're just Muslim, then try to lead Believers astray with their distorted understanding of the Qur'an and Islam. Sectants and satanists have one thing in common - they're Qur'an rejectors. The Qur'an complete and fully detailed.
@HiBye-k3z
@HiBye-k3z 22 күн бұрын
Hi brother Do you think that you could do a stream on monasticism at some point? Maybe you could do it as part of a talk on good bid'ah.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 21 күн бұрын
I'll add it to a running list. Though there isn't really much to say about it. It was only the Salafis/Wahhabis in their vendetta against Sufism - which they've forgotten about since now the big enemy are Shia. I mean, what is there to say? Nobody seriously thinks a monastic life is forbidden by God
@darkheart9668
@darkheart9668 23 күн бұрын
This is sorta confusing, because I see your chart at the 28 minute mark. And the punishment will never reach 10 for infinity, but it's still a punishment that lasts forever and to me, it still doesn't sound fair? Idk, I know the Quran says that no injustice will be done, but the concept of hell always troubled me
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 23 күн бұрын
@@darkheart9668 it's just an analogy, and your reading if wrong. Think of it more like a distribution than cumulative. Like if have a whole piza to give you (a whole specific finite amount of punishment) ... and I give you half on the first day. Then half what's left on the next day (1/4). Then half what's left on the next, etc etc ... that would go on for infinity. Only "at" infinity, would you get the whole pizza. You would never eat more than that just that one pizza certainly Maybe that's an easier analogy than a chart Ultimately I personally don't believe that though. I believe in timelessness in Hell.
@darkheart9668
@darkheart9668 21 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam how does timelessness compare though? In your opinion, how does that translate to when it comes to punishment. Timelessness still sounds like an eternal never ending suffering to me.
@MrMShake
@MrMShake 23 күн бұрын
At 58:20 someone asked about your opinion on cousin marriage, you said you already answered it in the chat, however I couldn't find your answer, could you point me to it? Inbreeding is a serious issue in many traditional Muslim societies.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 21 күн бұрын
Yeah, that's strange. I don't remember. Maybe i meant i answered it earlier during the stream? That's my faint recollection currently. As for the question, no of course i believe in genetic diseases. Continuous, generational cousin marriages without any new blood definitely increase the likelihood to unacceptable levels. But single instances of cousin marriages don't that much I think. In the end it is up to the individuals to weigh the risks.
@MrMShake
@MrMShake 21 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam ok, but do you think it would be religiously acceptable for Muslim societies to develop a taboo of cousin marriage so that it is infrequent? There's a viral clip circulating on X of someone on the JRE claiming that ~50% of the Arab world and 80% of Pakistan is inbred(not sure what exactly qualifies as inbred) and they're blaming Islam and the Prophet for it(imu Zaynab bint Jahsh was a 1st cousin) and that inbreeding results in a lower average IQ, higher % of the population suffering from diseases, retardation which leads to extremism/terrorism/violent crimes.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 12 күн бұрын
Yes, I think it would be acceptable as a taboo. But it should still be legal. I doubt those stats are true, and they are probably skewed via definitions. There's a lot of worse inadvertent inbreeding in the ghetto areas of europe and America. You have promiscuous men who sleep around with many women for years and have numberous bastard children (and of course it is only the same small percentage of men who are able to do this, either via "game" or status). These men are at it for decades in the same city, and so it happens some end up with their own daughters. Or half-brothers with half-sisters. Who knows what the stats are for that though. Anyway, genetics doesn't work like that. Inbreeding only allows a greater chance for recessive genes to be expressed. I doubt it plays much in IQ either ... IQ itself is genetic, and if two high IQ cousins marry then their child will likely be high IQ not lower. And as for terrorism/morality? No corrolation. They are just ignorant of the issues in traditional islam, so decide to pin that on inbreeding. The issues are hadiths, scholars, sectarianism, etc ... you don't need a high IQ to know that killing apostates is wrong. Either way, frequent cousin marriages certainly isn't the best. This is even recognized in hadiths
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 23 күн бұрын
Salaams, I just watched the garden shirk live. So my question is, was the man in Ibadah to himself? Was it his shirk? And besides, some thoughts which agree with the discussion you had about reincarnation. Imagine a 16 year old by killed by an assasin from a distant sniper rifle, his test wasn't finished. It was as though he was giving his exam in the examination hall, and a man suddenly entered the exam hall, and snatched his answer sheet, tore it into pieces, was his exam over? Of course not, he will be asked to give the exam again, with a new question paper, in a different exam hall. Similarly the 16 year old will be born again with a new body, skin color, language and location. And his new life will have the same duration like his exam duration.
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 23 күн бұрын
Another question, is the Ibadah of the mushrik to the kufr out of belief? Meaning does he believe whatever the kufr was propagated to be true?
@ZenIslam19
@ZenIslam19 22 күн бұрын
@@nikobellic3096 There's a belief that people under 40 get a forgiveness break or even get another chance at life. Being a mushrik isn't about belief so much as the actions of tormenting people with exclusivist doctrines propogated by the taghut clerics/scholars, and other sectarian or misleading speech acts.
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 22 күн бұрын
​@@ZenIslam19So what about those people who blindly believe the lies propagated by the taghut? Are they too in Ibadah to the kufr?
@ZenIslam19
@ZenIslam19 22 күн бұрын
@@nikobellic3096 If a warner has come to them. But sealing prophethood has the effect that the corruptions of the last 1400 years might be more forgiveable. You'll be questioned on the hearing and seeing, so if someone is educated like us the burden of critical thought is greater. God's justice is elegant and nuanced to the conditions of the individual. That's why the takfiri sort of Quranism where all traditionalists are called mushriks is both unproductive and incorrect, as well as being a bummer and dimming the nur of the pure Islam.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 21 күн бұрын
No. It was about himself setting himself up as an object of 'ibada for his companion. If you are in 'ibada to others with Allah, then you have set up a "shareek with Allah", you have done "shirk with Allah". But also if you set yourself up to be an object of 'ibada for others, then you've also set up a shareek with Allah and have committed "shirk with Allah". The difference is that that shareek is you Wrt to your example of the 16 year old boy, I agree with you fully.
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 24 күн бұрын
I had a question, what was the shirk of the rich man in Surah Al-Kahf?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@nikobellic3096 We covered that in the live stream called "Garden Shirk". The thumbnail has a pic of a couple of gardeners.
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 23 күн бұрын
​@@QuranicIslamAnother question, is the Ibadah of the mushrik to the kufr out of belief? Meaning does he believe whatever the kufr was propagated to be true? And can we say that the kafir is (ungrateful) is a narcissist? Because a narcissist wants control and dominance over people, a narcissist is filled with arrogance, so a person who is a shakir is filled with humility, humbleness, soft hearted nature, openness to other opinions, can a kafir be someone who is harsh, hard hearted person, who isn't ready to listen to other people's opinions, and he follows his egoistic desires and covers the truth with a lie, he recognises God's Truth, but he is ungrateful to it, he alters it. It's like you give me a book that you are the author of and you've written it with your own hands, and you have gifted me that book, but I arrogantly believe that I know better and can never be wrong, thus I begin to alter your book, change the chapters, make chapter 4 come after chapter 1, erase some parts that I dislike. Would that be considered a behaviour coming out of kufr? Plus I have added some stuff out of my own beliefs in the book you gave me which are harmful to society. The traditional Islam has the traits of kufr, imagine a land where Shariah (of traditional Islam) is implemented, what kind of society that would create? A society filled with false pride, arrogance, acting as though they have monopoly on Truth, others are destined for hell etc. Whereas a land where true Shariah coming from true Islamic principles is implemented, we would see traits of shukr, a society filled with humility and humbleness, soft hearted people, open to criticism, open to other people's opinions, no arrogance or pride at all, complete humility and kindness. As that society is in Ibadah to Allah And the traditional Islamic Shariah is kufr, and society which that Islam creates are in blind Ibadah to that kufr. Let me know your thoughts.
@ZenIslam19
@ZenIslam19 22 күн бұрын
It wasn't shirk it was the kufr of being smug
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 12 күн бұрын
No, it isn't out of believe but out of devotion and reverence. And it is shown especially when the person knows that it is wrong and not true. If he thinks his idol is correct in commanding him to evil, then that is an issue of kufr in the mushrik himself .... kufr of his own humanity, hearing, sight, mind, etc ... bc the only way he can come to believe that his idol commanding him to evil is "true/good" is if he gave up or corrupted his own God given senses and humanity.` That's exactly like what a kafir is. If you remember the chart of whom God loves and loves not; all the qualities that God loves are not in a kafir. They can't be. The two lists are mutually exclusive. And yes, in a lot of ways when you look at the traits of kufr you find them in the traditional Islamic setting, especially in the worst Muslim countries
@Nasir-USA
@Nasir-USA 24 күн бұрын
Doesn't Noah make istighfaar after that prayer?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@Nasir-USA Yeah, he makes it at the end of the prayer. Not sure what you are asking that for? My main point is the prayer came after the flood. And that shows there were still people around
@Nasir-USA
@Nasir-USA 23 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam Well, my point is maybe Prophet Noah realized he made a mistake in asking Allah to destroy the kuffaars, etc
@Nasir-USA
@Nasir-USA 23 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam thank you
@Nasir-USA
@Nasir-USA 24 күн бұрын
Khaled, what is the root word of "Saahuun" and what does it mean? Many of us we are negligent about Salah because we can't get up for Fajar or we combine our prayers or we pray in our cars. Are we destroyed? Will bad things happen to us in Aakhira? Also, sometimes when I pray, my mind is thinking about anything, but God, mostly.
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 24 күн бұрын
Read my comment in this video
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@Nasir-USA None of that is being negligent regarding salat. See my video essay about that very sura. Actually two videos, the second is a follow up. To give you part of the bottom line; the explanation is in the sura itself to be "saahuun" wrt salat means to do it for show, to be seen by others, yet when others asking you for help, you withhold it ... even small neighbourly assistance
@Nasir-USA
@Nasir-USA 23 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam Thank you brother
@ZenIslam19
@ZenIslam19 22 күн бұрын
@@Nasir-USA Fajr: pray when you wake up. Combining is ok, maybe better to only do it with a real excuse like work, scheduled meetings, commute etc. Make up missed Salah to fully repent, nafl prayer is also great. The salah is like a booster shot to keep your consciousness focused on God's path for you. Most people have weak khushu, we're not Sufi/Zen masters, but it's good to aspire to improve khushu and you get more qualitative benefit out of the salah when you do.
@republicofjupiter
@republicofjupiter 24 күн бұрын
Hi. Peace be upon you. Did God drown Noah's son because he was a product of infidelity as you said or because he was evil as well?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@republicofjupiter He didn't drown any specific person. The drowning came to all of Noah's people to do away with them since they had reached a point of no return (the reason for peoples being destroyed). His son could have been saved, the ark was there for whoever wanted it and would climb on. It shows you the state of the people, including his son, such that even when the flood waters were rising precariously, none would deign to get on the Ark
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 24 күн бұрын
​@@QuranicIslam Brother please read to my comment
@republicofjupiter
@republicofjupiter 24 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam interesting interpretation. Also why was Noah's son not being his own biological son mentioned in the verse? Does it have any spiritual lesson in it? Thanks for the quick reply and take care
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@republicofjupiter I think it is mentioned in the verse which says "He is not of your family. He is an act unrighteous". See the live stream about "Nuh's son"
@republicofjupiter
@republicofjupiter 24 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam thanks
@ClydeSimpson-vv3hj
@ClydeSimpson-vv3hj 25 күн бұрын
Thoughts on the theory of there being multiple arks? Since technically the word fulk can be used as both a plural (like Surah 43 verse 12) or singular.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@ClydeSimpson-vv3hj I don't think that holds water. Q43:12 isn't plural, it's the definite article that stands for a whole category. Like saying "the ship that uses steam engines is outdated" ... it means all such ships.
@SubmissiontoGod-be9qu
@SubmissiontoGod-be9qu 25 күн бұрын
Peace be with you. Brother, I heard some students of knowledge say that in prostration, one should only speak Arabic when they supplicate. I supplicate in English and All Thanks and Praises Be To Allah, Allah answered my prayers or supplications duas. I perform all the obligatory acts of the prayer in Arabic of course but after glorifying Allah in prostration sujood, I ask Allah in my language. Why are these people so keen on telling Muslims to only asking in Arabic, which dialect to use even? By the way, I am talking about personal supplications like for instance: Oh Allah, help me with my exams or secure my house, not the ones prescribed in the Sunnah which I learn both in Arabic and the English meaning. It does not feel genuine when I don’t know what I’m saying if I speak a foreign language, there is no language barrier between us and Allah. Thanks, brother. Salam Aleikum. Peace Be Unto You.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@SubmissiontoGod-be9qu Who knows why the thoughtless say what they say? It's fine to do the whole prayer in your language
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 25 күн бұрын
Salaams, I don't know what is your opinion on the things I showed. But I'd like to share some thoughts on the corruption of Islam as well, previously I was focused on Hinduism. An example of contaminated and corruted Islam can be given through the analogy of the mirror. We all know that analogy "I kept wiping the mirror, until I realized that it was my face which had the dirt" Similar is the case here, but there is a difference. And that is, that the mirror is traditional Islam which is dirty and contaminated, it has all the dirty markings, it was made dirty by evil people, one looks into the mirror, assuming he that his face is dirty, as though the mirror is telling him "Look at yourself, how dirty your face is!" Basically traditional Islam telling you "How sinful you are, you listen to music? You missed your prayer? You're going to hell" and the one who is fooled by the mirror wipes his face even though it's clean, he cries like a fool thinking he is a sinner, not knowing that the mirror itself is a sinner, a dirty one, and he is pure from all it claims, the mirror has 'kafir' written on it, the one who sees his face in it thinks that the mirror is showing that he is a kafir and will go to hell because he missed his prayer intentionally. But in reality, the mirror itself is a kafir, as kufr means to cover the truth with a lie, the mirror is showing a false image of his spiritual state and the spiritual state of others, he looks at the world from the perspective of that contaminated mirror, assuming how others are 'non-believers' and how everything around him is 'haram' and how many will go to hell.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 24 күн бұрын
@@nikobellic3096 nice 👍
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77 25 күн бұрын
I Love You Brother 💚💚💚🕊️🕊️🕊️
@hectorlasprilla853
@hectorlasprilla853 25 күн бұрын
Salaam alaykum. I would like to thank you again for the insight. Sorry that I had to go so quickly. I was at the masjid and dates started
@hectorlasprilla853
@hectorlasprilla853 25 күн бұрын
Dars*
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 25 күн бұрын
@@hectorlasprilla853 👍 ... No problem
@perfectdawah4535
@perfectdawah4535 10 күн бұрын
​@QuranicIslam Salam alaikom brother Khalid. I wrote a message on Friday and invited you to my live, but now I see that it was deleted by KZfaq. 😡 How about this coming Saturday? Are you available?
@perfectdawah4535
@perfectdawah4535 10 күн бұрын
​@QuranicIslam Salam alaikom brother Khalid. My comment gets deleted.
@justapassione5554
@justapassione5554 Ай бұрын
How do you uphold the 5 pillars without hadith?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@justapassione5554 The "5 pillars" as a concept don't actually come from the Prophet when you analyze it. It was a saying of ibn Umar. He would say it when people would urge him to fight, his reply would be "Islam is only built upon 5 ... etc" The tyrants of the time (the Ummayads) loved this statement of his for obvious reasons, and so promoted it in their khutbas via their scholars until it was attributed to the Prophet As for the individual parts of it, all are from the Deen of course, but all of them have been corrupted or debased by Hadiths and traditional Islam 1. Shahada in the Qur'an is a lofty high concept. It is about testifying for God, and being a witness to truth, even against yourself, parents, friends, group, sect, religion, etc 2- salat has been stripped of its benefit & purpose by the imposition of rituals & their elaboration. That's from start to finish and before. In place of the single verse of wudu in the Qur'an, you now find the "fiqh of wudu" in a bookshop in two volumes. Or a course with a scholar that takes 3 months to complete and if you don't keep reviewing the details, you forget them. Salat is filled with everything but its core, isn't uplifting people towards its goal, nor is it effective in its job. All bc of the bloated fiqh and misleading Hadiths. And on top of all of that, Hadiths don't actually teach you how to pray. No one learns to pray from Hadiths. All Hadiths have are arguments over details. 3. Zakat in the Qur'an is different from the zakat of fiqh and Hadiths. And it is used to make people forget and ignore the other financial duties in the Qur'an (such as the prohibition of hoarding wealth) with the idea that so long as you pay your zakat, there is no other religious claim on your wealth 4. Fasting's purpose to attain taqwa is absent in people's minds. Ramadan comes and goes, and they remain unaware of what taqwa even is never mind how to achieve it via fasting 5. Hajj is getting worse and worse every year, crowded and difficult for all but the strong or the wealthy. It wouldn't be that way if certain things of the Qur'an regarding Hajj were given priority. Hajj also, like salat, isn't learnt via Hadiths. It's a continuous practice that has been done generation upon generation, each learning from those before. Muslims and others did Hajj before the Prophet & after him. When you go to Hajj, you follow the crowd or your guide, who himself learn by following someone.
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77 Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77 Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77 Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤
@asr2009
@asr2009 Ай бұрын
Salām thank you brother for this.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@asr2009 any time
@riyaansheikh7470
@riyaansheikh7470 Ай бұрын
I wanna ask a question At around 47:37 or so, they talk about the earth being the centre of the universe. Could this mean that before The Big Bang, everything was compressed into one tiny "spot" and the "spot" is where Earth is now? Does this explain the verse in Surah Al Anbiyaa (c21 v30) which says: "Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a *_joined entity_* , and We separated them..." So does this imply earth and "heaven"(universe) were in one "spot" before The Big Bang? Side note: I'm not really an expert so please excuse me for poor language or understanding. Thanks in advance and may Allah bless you and grant you Jannah (and ofc the stuff we dont know mentioned in this video 😅😅) And also at 57:44, the woman was talking about how her NDE experience was more real than real life itself! Could the following verse in the Qu'ran be a reference to that?:⬇️ "And what is the life of this world except the enjoyment of *_delusion."_* (Surah Ali Imran 3:185) So kind of like a matrix type of thing or something idk?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@riyaansheikh7470 Yeah, that's an intriguing thought. One that didn't occur to me even though I was going for the idea that earth/humanity could be like the seed that brings life to the rest of the universe. So if we are in the center, and there was a Big Bang, it would make sense to be at the same point of the earth. I don't think any of those verses are explicitly relevant enough for that idea though Yes, the idea that the next life is even more "alive" can be seen in that verse, more so in this; { وَمَا ہٰذِہِ الۡحَیٰوۃُ الدُّنۡیَاۤ اِلَّا لَہۡوٌ وَّلَعِبٌ ؕ وَاِنَّ الدَّارَ الۡاٰخِرَۃَ لَہِیَ الۡحَیَوَانُ ۘ لَوۡ کَانُوۡا یَعۡلَمُوۡنَ } [Surah Al-ʿAnkabūt: 64] Abdul Haleem: The life of this world is merely an amusement and a diversion; the true life is in the Hereafter, if only they knew. Conversely, the people of Hell have less "life/aliveness" than this world. I mentioned this in one of the early live streams. See this verse for example; { اِنَّہٗ مَنۡ یَّاۡتِ رَبَّہٗ مُجۡرِمًا فَاِنَّ لَہٗ جَہَنَّمَ ؕ لَا یَمُوۡتُ فِیۡہَا وَلَا یَحۡیٰی } [Surah Ṭā-Hā: 74] Abdul Haleem: Hell will be the reward of those who return to their Lord as evildoers: there they will stay, neither living nor dying.
@moon-km3ox
@moon-km3ox Ай бұрын
5:38 did he really say "father" there?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@moon-km3ox He said "Rabb" in all of them, but since Rabb in Arabic ia actually in between father and Lord (and actually closer to father since the word literally means "the one who raises you") I used both to give the impression he was going for; that God cares for everyone. See the use of "Rabb" here for example, for both God and parents; { وَاخۡفِضۡ لَہُمَا جَنَاحَ الذُّلِّ مِنَ الرَّحۡمَۃِ وَقُلۡ رَّبِّ ارۡحَمۡہُمَا کَمَا رَبَّیٰنِیۡ صَغِیۡرًا ؕ } [Surah Al-Isrāʾ: 24] Sahih International: And lower to them the wing of humility out of mercy and say, My Lord, have mercy upon them as they brought me up [when I was] small. Dr. Mustafa Khattab: And be humble with them out of mercy, and pray, “My Lord! Be merciful to them as they raised me when I was young.” Yusuf Ali: And, out of kindness, lower to them the wing of humility, and say: "My Lord! bestow on them thy Mercy even as they cherished me in childhood." Abdul Haleem: and lower your wing in humility towards them in kindness and say, ‘Lord, have mercy on them, just as they cared for me when I was little.’
@ZenIslam19
@ZenIslam19 Ай бұрын
Dawah to Christians should educate them on the historical scholarship on NT theological formation so they can open up to being Unitarian
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
no way you believe in "night journey" !!! no way it is mentioned in a quran!
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@knkn5049 😆 I actually don't understand. Is it a "no way!" of good surprise or bad surprise?
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam it is chapter of beni israil, it is full chapter anout moses, and full story about "night journey" is fabricated: it is journey of Arda Viraf+ dialogue of Abraham with God from bible story of Sodom and Gomorrah.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@knkn5049 I don't think the Israa is fabricated. The mi'raaj yes, and all the fabrications around it happened bc the Israa was real.
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam people do not need to fabricate, when they have true original: Here is three hadiths of our favorite story: Sunan an-Nasa'i 448, Sahih al-Bukhari 7517, Sahih Muslim 163. Oh i have lost my list of questions, the idea is: all hadiths contradict to eachother in almost every detail of the story. So i had list of questions i need the answer, based on what you have read: from where prophet ascended to heaven and where was he washed by water of zamzam? was there animal? Did he spoke to other prophets? What prophets was on 2nd and 6th heavens? Did the Prophet ﷺ got 50 prayers before he reached lote-tree or after? You can add sahih muslim 162a, 164a and explain to me where was Prophet offered wine? In Jerusalem or under Lote-tree? As long as you add new hadiths to clear some contradictions, they add only more questions. And you can actually see how they fabricated things: one of hadiths uses analogy of "two bow lengths" it is quote from Quran (verse 53:1-10) , and you want to say, that people, whose whole religion based on memorising the Quran, all forgot bunch of verses, that part of the story itself? It is ridiculous. Author of hadith just added verses to give his story more weight. To make it more quran-like. As i told already, it is book of Arda Viraf, + famous dialogue of Abraham with god from bible. Arda Viraf was drinking wine, but to show superiority of "our prophet" we will change this part, now Muhammad refuses wine, our prophet is better than zoroastrian prophet, our prophet do not drink. We will establish bloodline between Muhammad and Abraham himself, and Abraham will call him son. And our Prophet obviously better than Moses, why? Moses himself will cry how good and superior Muhammad and his people. And he will accent higher than Moses in the heavens. You know, modern fan fiction about Harry Potter and Draco Malfoy not as obvious as those hadiths about Moses and Muhammad. Even angel of hell himself run towards Muhammad to greet him first.... Everything is fabricated from top to bottom.
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam people do not need to fabricate, when they have true original: Here is three hadiths of our favorite story: Sunan an-Nasa'i 448, Sahih al-Bukhari 7517, Sahih Muslim 163. Oh i have lost my list of questions, the idea is: all hadiths contradict to eachother in almost every detail of the story. So i had list of questions i need the answer, based on what you have read: from where prophet ascended to heaven and where was he washed by water of zamzam? was there animal? Did he spoke to other prophets? What prophets was on 2nd and 6th heavens? Did the Prophet ﷺ got 50 prayers before he reached lote-tree or after? You can add sahih muslim 162a, 164a and explain to me where was Prophet offered wine? In Jerusalem or under Lote-tree? As long as you add new hadiths to clear some contradictions, they add only more questions. And you can actually see how they fabricated things: one of hadiths uses analogy of "two bow lengths" it is quote from Quran (verse 53:1-10) , and you want to say, that people, whose whole religion based on memorising the Quran, all forgot bunch of verses, that part of the story itself? It is ridiculous. Author of hadith just added verses to give his story more weight. To make it more quran-like. As i told already, it is book of Arda Viraf, + famous dialogue of Abraham with god from bible. Arda Viraf was drinking wine, but to show superiority of "our prophet" we will change this part, now Muhammad refuses wine, our prophet is better than zoroastrian prophet, our prophet do not drink. We will establish bloodline between Muhammad and Abraham himself, and Abraham will call him son. And Moses himself will be jealous how good and superior Muhammad and his people. Everything is fabricated from top to bottom.
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
Oh! It is about Sabians, i just investigated it yesterday, i think first muslims were sabians(Al-Bukhari 344, 3522): were reading night sky and zodiac signs. And god himself put zodiac signs in sky, for people to read and observe:(15 16) and (25 61). But later that tradition was dropped. But i still haven't finished my investigation and don't know all evidences to support "influence of the stars or other buruj's" in quran, it could be just another iteration of "satanic verses" to please another religious group, same as "19 guardians of hell" fabrication.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@knkn5049 haha! 😏 what is the "it" in your first sentence? Love the enthusiasm. The "sabi'un"/sabians mentioned in these verses, in my view, are the religious apostates of all groups. They are the individual Christians, Jews, and even Muslims, and also Hindus, Budhists, etc ... Anyone who was born into a religion, saw faults in it that they couldn't just cover up or put on the side & cover with faith, and so left that organized religion but maintained the primary faith & belief in a Creator. Yes, the early Muslims were called that by the Meccans, and again there it is because they left and apostated from the religion they were on. Hence why I think it means apostates. The exMuslims to me now, for example, are sabi'een.
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam you just ate English explanation "who embraced new religion" that doesn't belong to original arabic text. But it is just the way modern sheikhs try to escape embarrassment: for hadiths 344,3522 your made up explanation works, but translator of Al-bukhari 4372 decided to use his opportunity and explicitly deny any connections. In reality you have to open tafsirs and read who are sabians: Al-Jalalayn, ibn Abbas, Kashani tafsir s for 2:62, 22:17 will explicitly tell you that sabians worship some kind of angels, that live on planets, in their little houses, mansions, and for word "mansion" ibn Abbas used word "buruj" (zodiac signs) for verses 15:16, 25:61. I haven't finished my research, but i can show you some verses to demonstrate unhealthy attention to stars from quran.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@knkn5049 Not really sure what you mean by this reply. The definition of Sabians is what I think works, in both the Qur'an and Hadiths. It is actually found in tafsir too; that they are those who have left the religion of their forefathers, so apostates. See alTabari here for example; قال أبو جعفر: و"الصابئون" جمع"صابئ"، وهو المستحدث سوى دينه دينا، كالمرتد من أهل الإسلام عن دينه. وكل خارج من دين كان عليه إلى آخر غيره، تسميه العرب:"صابئا". يقال منه:"صبأ فلان يصبأ صبْأ" And again he has; واختلف أهل التأويل فيمن يلزمه هذا الاسم من أهل الملل. فقال بعضهم: يلزم ذلك كل من خرج من دين إلى غير دين. وقالوا: الذين عنى الله بهذا الاسم، قوم لا دين لهم Then lists all the narrations that support that. These are the opinions he puts in first Of course the tafsirs give lots of different interpretations too. So, being the "mother of tafsirs", puts in other opinions including what you said; وقال آخرون: هم قوم يعيدون الملائكة ويصلون إلى القبلة That they say worship God, pray the 5 daily prayers, face Mecca, recite the Zabour ... but also worship angels AlJalalyn doesn't say that. He says they are a sect among Jews or Christians, and nothing else. Ibn 'Abbas doesn't have a tafsir. You'll have to quote Kashani, I've never seen it Still though, I don't think sabi'un has anything to do with worshipping angels. These opinions seem to come from thin air without any backing. And I haven't seen anything about planets or little "homes" Not sure what you mean by an unhealthy obsession with stars in the Qur'an nor its relevance here. You were saying they worship angels not stars. The main opinion given by Tabari and others is obviously the correct one imo; they are apostates.
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam i use "altafsir" of Jordan, to read tafsirs. Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs for 2:62, 5:69, 22:17 2:62 "...sabaeans) A christian sect whose members shave the middle of their heads, read the gospel, worship the angels and say: " our hearts have returned (saba'at) unto allah..." 5:69 "...sabaeans) a christian sect, WHO are milder(soft) than the other christians..." and it is religion: "...Jews repent of Judaism, the SABAEANS OF THEIR RELIGION and the Christians of Christianity..." 22:17 "...sabaeans) the itinerants..." (moving from place to place) And you can find translation of al-Taḥrīr wa-al-Tanwīr: "...The essence of this religion is the worship of the celestial bodies, such as the planets, the moon, and some stars like the North Star. They believe in the Creator of the universe, who is one..... However, they claimed that humans are incapable of reaching the majesty of the Creator, ..... They claimed that these spirits inhabit the planets and descend into human souls to connect with them ..... They worship the celestial bodies intending to connect with their spiritualities, and for the descent of those spiritualities onto human souls...." And Al-Jalalayn and Kashani and ibn Abbas do not contradict to each other and to al-Taḥrīr wa-al-Tanwīr. Sect? Probably, but how do they differ? They worship stars. You holding on explanation in brackets, that was made up on last week, and 3rd hadith i showed to you, contradicts to "version of apostates" and none of available english tafsirs mention "apostasy", but you get good view to sabians as some kind of nomads/bedouins who natively use star navigation and practice some kind of astrology.
@knkn5049
@knkn5049 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam it is you who has to quote Tabari, when i brought you 4 tafsirs to support one version, you cherry picked Tabari i never heard about, to protect "explanation in brackets" that was added on top of the text. "All narrations that support that" narrators are parrots, they repeat things, they support nothing. On other hand i gave you 4 different tafsirs to support one opinion. Al-Jalalayn and Kashani and ibn Abbas will develop their ideas about 'what "buruj" means' for different verses: 15:16 and their explanation will correlate to "sabians as star worshipers": angels, mansions, constellations... And you dodged 3rd hadith, that contradicts to version of Tabari. I think Tabari was aware that prophet was called sabian, and tried to cover it up, while others scholars could speak freely about what they know. Altafsir contains 50 Arabic tafsirs for 2:62, you read arabic, list me 10 i can open and support version of "apostates" and not religion as ibn Abbas says.
@TheClimbToTheStars
@TheClimbToTheStars Ай бұрын
5:24. Can you give reference for that sahaba statement
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 25 күн бұрын
They are commonly known. In Muslim and Bukhari and many other collections
@imblue2844
@imblue2844 Ай бұрын
Do ex-muslims go to hell?
@abdar-rahman6965
@abdar-rahman6965 Ай бұрын
*Sunnah and Hadiths are Inventions of Sunni and Shia sects*
@user-ls8ks7kv8c
@user-ls8ks7kv8c Ай бұрын
Regarding 16:00, "me" is included in there with the kasra under the noon. It's not "يعبدونني" because the laam in the beginning makes it majzoom (مجزوم)
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@user-ls8ks7kv8c How do you know a kasra was part of the original? The qira'a of Ya'qub has a ي rather than a kasra.
@user-ls8ks7kv8c
@user-ls8ks7kv8c Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam Whether it's a kasra or a yaa, the end result is the same (possessive pronoun). For examples of the نِ (noon with kasra) being a possessive pronoun (like noon with yaa ني), see 26:78-81. And as for the notion that our entire lives should be dedicated to the 'ibadah of Allah(swt), we have the famous verse of 6:162-3. Your Arabic masha'Allah seems to overall be good from what limited videos I've seen but just wanted to point this out للإفادة and I don't mind being proven wrong if I've missed the mark. Your videos have certainly given me a lot to think about and though I still believe in the necessity of following hadiths and obeying the Messenger(pbuh&f) (particularly since many hadiths do have practical benefits that agree with the Quran, like bathroom cleanliness), alhamdulillah your videos and ones similar to yours have definitely driven home the necessity of putting the Quran as #1 and judging all hadiths (whether attributed to the Prophet(pbuh&f) or science or self-help books or any hadith) by it and I have found a greater love and affinity for the Quran as a result of this. And interestingly enough this concept is found in the Shia tradition, with them having many hadiths saying to judge everything by the Quran (and to even throw hadiths that contradict the Quran against the wall), even if few act upon this. And Allah(swt) knows the reality of the matter and may Allah(swt) increase us in guidance and knowledge amen
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 25 күн бұрын
The question remains, how do you know a kasra was part of the original? The kasra doesn't appear in manuscripts as far as I know. In all the cases that I'm aware of, a nun with a kasra can be read without it just as easily. The point is that whether there was a kasra or a fatha, we will never be entirely certain, because the script did not include either. Remember, the qira'at are ultimately divergences from what the Prophet recited. We don't know exactly how he recited it. I certainly don't believe he recited it multiple ways. And as far as I can ascertain from what we have, he would pause at the end of each verse But in either case, the meaning is still a correct one. And in fact I would say both are meant Q6:162-3 is the Prophet's declaration. It is loftiest stance, but isn't a commandment. So I wouldn't go so far as saying our entire lives "should" be dedicated to Allah in that way. They should out of gratitude and insight and recognition of who Allah is and complete and utter faith in Him. But such a state can't be reached by someone else "commanding you to it". No problem at all, and jazakallah. The point I'm making with this can be most clearly seen in Q2:152 فَٱذْكُرُونِىٓ أَذْكُرْكُمْ وَٱشْكُرُوا۟ لِى وَلَا تَكْفُرُونِ fadhkuruni is cleary "remember Me" Yet takfurun could be "don't be ungrateful to Me", ie for the favor just mentioned in the previous verse, or it could be general لا تكفرونَ with a fatha, which case it would be encompassing of not being ungrateful the Messenger too, the vehicle of the blessing just mentioned, and also ungrateful of, and thus kufr of rejection, of the blessing itself, ie the recital/rehearsal of God's signs, the purification, the teaching of the prescriptions and wisdon Yes, putting the Qur'an first and more central is really the main thing that I am trying to push towards, not the rejection of hadiths. If the Qur'an is given its due, no Hadiths can harm. But the only way you will be able to weigh hadiths by the Qur'an is if you first know the Qur'an and have Qur'nic religious mindset. If you try to have a mindset of Qur'an and Hadiths together, or try to develop one with them together, you can be easily tripped up. Take hold of the Qur'an first, firmly, loosen and set aside the hold on hadiths until that is firmly established ... then turn back and look at hadiths with fresh eyes. You might be surprised at what you see and what you didn't see before. Yes, the Shia tradition has that, bc of the Qur'an & Ahlul Bayt paradigm, the latter of whom never separated from the Qur'an (unlike many sahaba) but they also ultimately fell victim to the same issues. آمين بالله التوفيق واليه نستند للسداد
@user-ls8ks7kv8c
@user-ls8ks7kv8c 25 күн бұрын
​@@QuranicIslam Regarding the kasra, we can be relatively certain because it is a point of Arabic grammar. If you add a grammatical li (لِـ) in front of plural masculine verbs like يعبدون then you cut off the noon (ن) at the end. Here is an example from the Quran: لِـيدّبروا (38:29) Notice it's ليدبروا and not ليدبرون You have to cut off the noon at the end. Some other examples: لِـيكفروا (16:55, 29:66, 30:34) ليكونوا (4:102, 19:81, 35:6) ليقولوا (6:53, 6:105) لتذهبوا (4:19) etc etc Thus you will not have a noon with a fatha on it signifying it is a plural masculine verb if the verb begins with a grammatical li لِـ (except for poetic license). Thus having a noon at the end of ليعبدوا would tell us that it means: ليعبدونِ (to worship Me) Because to have it as a fatha on the noon would break the normal rules of Arabic grammar which we see throughout the Quran, as that noon shouldn't be there in the first place. (I don't want to go heavy in Arabic grammar and dump a bunch of اصطلاحات on you but you can look up لام العاقبة and لام التعليل and various other usages of laam if you wish online or in a book of grammar, but hopefully the examples I gave from the Quran should be sufficient and please let me know if you find examples in the Quran that go against what I have above) Plus if alllll of the famous qira'aat agreed on this (the one with ي has the same meaning, "Me"), then why would we doubt that this is the correct method of pronouncing it, particularly when it agrees with Arabic grammar? If you want to argue "poetic license", it would appear to be a Pandora's box to reject all of the famous methods of reciting the Quran and go with a reading that breaks the regular rules of Arabic? Surely that would be tantamount to rejecting the Quran itself? How would Allah(swt)'s Book be preserved (15:9, 41:42) if the "true" pronunciation isn't found anywhere in our hands? And where would you draw the line? What if someone wants to say that 15:41 is actually: صراطُ عليٍّ مستقيم (referring to Ali bin Abi Talib a.s) or that 3:110 is: كنتم خير أئمة (since hamzas are sometimes added or removed in the various qiraa'aat) or that in 81:8 it's: وإذا المودّة (for the same reason as above) ? As for لا تكفرون with a fatha or a kasra, that would depend on what you're trying to say. If you're making it a stern prohibition you would say: لا تكفروا (cutting off the noon at the end). Whereas if you say: لا تكفرونَ Then you're basically saying "You shouldn't do kufr" (which is softer than an outright prohibition). (the difference is basically nahy haqiqi or majazi) So it would depend on what you're trying to say, whereas li (لِـ) in the beginning is much more clear-cut grammatically and thus you can't use as as an example against the noon above when there's a grammatical li in the beginning. But again, does it not seem dangerous to reject all of the famous qiraa'aat and go with a plausible reading from just the undotted manuscripts? Wallahu a'lam
@lionelchan1601
@lionelchan1601 Ай бұрын
Peace, I note lately how "difficult" it is for my people's (ie. Westernized Chinese) to give space for grief and the recognition of hurt. Hence making it "easy"/"well prepared" for hurt recognition to occur, lest hurt denial merely continue and a return to wholeness remain blocked, is a blessing from the Most High indeed. Space giving for grief then I think is best catalyzed by an embodiment free from future and past stucknesses. Sakina comes to mind. CS Lewis clearly did not have as much as he thought. Salaam.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@lionelchan1601 salaam. Honestly I didn't get that first paragraph too well, could you rephrase it? You mean grieving is socially/culturally looked down upon? What do you think C.S. Lewis thought he had? I've never read him apart from Screwtape Letters. I've been meaning to read his Mere Christianity and I have his Surprised By Joy on my shelf in my home country
@lionelchan1601
@lionelchan1601 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam Peace, Yes. Think British "stiff upper lip", but add a further stiffness that a superficial absorption (and simultaneous rejection) of Confucianism contributes. Adab as reduced to "how one or one's family looks in public", so that any emotionality at all is suppressed, in public and private. I guess CS Lewis thought he knew Allah SWT and the Most High, but instead he merely knew God, believing them to be the same. A fair enough refuge given conditions and culture, but one that is set to fail. Hence the Sakina and freedom from fear couldn't last, and his grief led directly to doubt. As the West is wont to do of course, the book recounting this that you grabbed his quote from is taken not as a indicator of failure of faith and erroneous foundations, but is transformed into a sign of wild success via strength of open sentiment. "They do not reason"...
@lionelchan1601
@lionelchan1601 Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam PS. Following a certain Muslim western academic critique of the Enlightenment thread, I came across this book: --- Throughout the course of its successive transformations, Western political thought has been impelled by its metaphysical determination to secure the appropriate theoretical grounds and instrumental means by which security itself could be secured. The politics of Western thought has, therefore, been a security project in the fullest sense of the term... it not only constitutes an escape from politics but also a form of tragic denial. - Michael Dillon, "The Politics of Security" --- Western colonialism and arrogance as a compensation for deep existential fear, which I propose again is based on a lack of true refuge in the Eternal (thinking that their "God" is the same). Real Sakina is thus culturally impossible... and will be for any of us too if we absorb the same errors.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@lionelchan1601 I actually don't know what the quote was from 😆 ... I just put in Google Images "fear and grief" looking for images to use in a thumbnail. This struck me, bc fear & grief are linked. May be they are essentially the same thing; anxiety. Only one is about the past, the other about the future.
@nikobellic3096
@nikobellic3096 Ай бұрын
Salaams, please do check my comment on your previous live
@aladindelic
@aladindelic Ай бұрын
No other group is included because they have to follow millet of Ibrahim. For example, buddists (and zoroastrians as their branch) have no belief in God at all; they believe in good/evil and other concepts, but they're godless. When we say "christians" we mean all of them or western christians (catholics mostly). Similarly, word translated as "Sabians" refer to eastern christians (orthodox). El-Mejoos in 22:17 are converters, not zoroastrians.
@lionelchan1601
@lionelchan1601 Ай бұрын
Peace, Whatever we want to say about "God", Buddhists are supposed to take true refuge in the Unconditioned however. The corruption within the ideas of reincarnation (contradicted by Annata) and the Triple Gem (all recognise Buddha died claiming there is only one refuge) fits with the need for a Qur'anic confirmation by correcting. The Brahma invitation is also an excellent critique of any mistaken elevation of any mere Jinn to the position of Source. Salaam.
@An_Gha_
@An_Gha_ Ай бұрын
Wa alaykum salam ​@@lionelchan1601 Interesting. Do you have any book recommendations about pure Buddhism to show it can be included in islam?
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@aladindelic Not sure what you mean by no other group is mentioned. You mean in those two verses? I don't think it would mention Buddhists or Hindus simply because they weren't present. Besides which they are included in the address to all mankind. Explicit belief in God, as I've often said, us in my view overrated and over emphasized. What "is" God? No one really knows. Whose to say a bear, impersonal concept of "Good" or "Energy" isn't closer to reality in comparison to how the "Abrahamic world" speaks of the Creator as a "person", with He rather than "It"? I think sabi'un refers to religious apostates of other religions. It is a praiseworthy thing to see the problems in Christianity & Judaism, yet keep the overarching faith in them and continue to be Christian or Jew ... but it is equally praiseworthy to see the problems and leave those religions out of faith in God and not accepting their corruptions. The early Muslims, according to narrations were called apostates from the religion of their forefathers using the word saba' Majoos I think are well known academically and not a mystery
@aladindelic
@aladindelic Ай бұрын
Just to clarify, I have nothing against Buddhists, and especially nothing against Hindus, I'm just stating facts that there's no concept of God in Buddhism and Hindus are polytheists. Hindus were present in Arabian peninsula, thus many people connect black stone from nowadays Ka'ba with Shiva's "stone". Persian Buddhists were neighbours to Arabs, as matter of fact they built Bagdad (originally Al-Medinet-us-Salam). Other religions were also present, but none of them are in these two ayat if they don't believe in God and Aakhiret and didn't make corrections. What is Allah in His Essence we are unable to know. This was known even to Aristotle, when he spoke about 5th state of matter (namely ether). What we can know and should strive to know and have is Him in His Names. As Aristotle also saw, there can be only knowledge or belief. We cannot have knowledge on Allah and Aakhiret, thus we have to have belief. There's no "proof for Allah". I wonder why muslims strive so hard to put (ancient) Persians in their company, when its very obvious from surah Ar-Room (30th) that Persians' defeat was a reason for celebration. After all, my view on this topic is that we all are different, but if one believes in Allah and in Aakhiret (knowledge is not required) and has done some SaaliHaat, then he'll get a reward in presence of his Rabb, there's no fear of unknown (what may happen) on/against him, and he has no reason to ever grieve (of what he missed/done wrong). Since a verb yaHzenoon is in imperfect then this will last as the Qur'an lasts and is surely not just for this life but also for the next life.
@lionelchan1601
@lionelchan1601 Ай бұрын
@@aladindelic Peace, Well I myself might have a problem with Buddhists and Hindus, I mean not personally, for I have no reason to believe we do not all try our best with what we are given. But if they are in denial of the Unconditioned, then they are in error, and they will spread corruption throughout the Earth, even if they don't intend to. This goes for "People of the Book" as well. And as far as I can tell, many of us still conceive of a "God" that is very far from being One, Almighty and All Merciful indeed, if our conduct in the world has anything to say about it. Sikhs as a group are the most consistent with this embodied Tawhid that I have seen, at least in the West. Peace.
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77
@OMAR-REZA-HAMiM-77 Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@ramillc
@ramillc Ай бұрын
Salām! Could the phrase “no fear will be upon them, nor will they grieve” be a reference to living in the present? Like you said during the stream, fear is for the future and grief concerns the past so if there is neither perhaps it could mean that those who believe and do good deeds will not overthink or worry in a “bad” way? Of course, people plan for the future and use the past as lessons but the opposite could be self imposed anxiety or depression caused by constant fear over the future (not trusting that things will be okay) and grief over past mistakes/bad choices (not believing one can be forgiven or be given another chance). Would love to get your thoughts on this!
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@ramillc Yes it could be, I was thinking a little along those lines, easy to do with a Sufi background, but though that idea is there I wanted to keep it more general and closer to what most people understand and is better seen in the text. Bc in most verses it is a promise & reward. While living in the present is something you yourself must achieve. Still, the verse that most closely tracks that idea is the one about the friends/saints/awliya of Allah. I didn't put it in the stream, but here it is; { اَلَاۤ اِنَّ اَوۡلِیَآءَ اللّٰہِ لَا خَوۡفٌ عَلَیۡہِمۡ وَلَا ہُمۡ یَحۡزَنُوۡنَ ۚۖ } [Surah Yūnus: 62] "Truly the awliya of God, there is no fear upon them nor dothey grieve" It is often taken as the definition of sainthood for Sufis. A true saint never has any fear for the future nor grieves for the past. He lives entirely in the present. As their saying goes "a Sufi is the son of the present"
@lionelchan1601
@lionelchan1601 Ай бұрын
Sakina... Those that have it or might have it are worth investigating, whatever their background. To me, 4:46 is an indicator to that those claiming spiritual authority should encourage others to personally verify their authority and freedom from fear or grief, as opposed to merely commanding obedience on the basis of institutional/sectarian position.
@NikMirza
@NikMirza Ай бұрын
Nobody know about what is Quranist or what is hadith. We just blindly follow what our scholars said.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@NikMirza Not sure what that means exactly, but I hope you do know now or are trying to. It isn't difficult. The Qur'an and Hadiths are in different circles and don't overlap much so that it will be confusing
@NikMirza
@NikMirza Ай бұрын
Polytheism didn't enter heaven according to Qur'an. I think.
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam 25 күн бұрын
A mushrik, no. But one of the things traditional Muslims now have wrong is equating polytheism with shirk. They are not the same thing
@NikMirza
@NikMirza 25 күн бұрын
@@QuranicIslam Okay nice
@TheClimbToTheStars
@TheClimbToTheStars Ай бұрын
Can you provide links to all those cosmology videos
@QuranicIslam
@QuranicIslam Ай бұрын
@@TheClimbToTheStars It's from the same documentary called "The Principle". Just Google it. It isn't free online
@TheClimbToTheStars
@TheClimbToTheStars Ай бұрын
@@QuranicIslam i found it on KZfaq