FINE work, cheapened at 7:00 >> "no wonder" 2 tries (to replace Connery.) We all know - Lazenby's Bond was not bad, even asked back, but he was a real jerk and listened to his agent's bad advice.

Sad Fleming passed before the movie came out He would have loved it

……nice to see in a photo Connery’s first wife, Australian Diane Cilento, who was the mother of their son, Jason.

Its good to have you back, and yes i can definitely consider goldfinger to be the high standard for the rest of the bind films to follow and seeing browsen and creig hold goldfinger in very high remarks always makes me proud to be a bond fan and why i fell in love with this franchise to start with.

Roger Moore was a good Bond.

I think Octopussy is Roger Moore's 3rd best Bond film after The Spy Who Loved Me and For Your Eyes Only. Solid film.

From Russia With Love is the James Bond movie.

1964 was amazing. I remember the filming at the Fountainbleu Hotel as I grew up in Miami Beach and the Beatles arrival in the US

Mr. Bond. James Bond. The British are anything but cowards.

when people say a modern audience they mean a few activists and virtue signalling, the "modern" audience doesnt watch movies going by the death of hollywood, disney and doctor who

As much as i love Mara Rooney‘s performance in that movie i just hate Daniel Craig‘s. He didn’t convince me at all. Too hard.

I am so exited I found this. Had more than a year of Disney+ subscription so downloading now :) Once I watch them, I will be sure to donate ;)

How is OJ Simpson’s lawyer, F. Lee Bailey, interviewing James Bond? 😂

Why did Sony cut the budget of the second movie?! That was the nail in the coffin right off the bat.

Yeah, it has some problems. I hate those puns, so to me the fact that this one introduced their usage with "shocking" is a definite flaw. I think the girls in tight leather flight suits look silly, and I actually thought they could've done a better job with the shot of the guy being ejected out of the car (why's the camera so far away from the action??). However, it's still my favourite of the Connery films.

Q was introduced in From Russia with Love.

I just love this part at 239 all 3 of them run out of ammo at the same time all 3 of them reloaded at the same time but 2 of them pointed guns at each other and got back up at the same time and 2 of them were aiming at John but John was at one standing not the one on the ground and John still smoked them and the same guy who played John wick is going to be voicing shadow in sonic 3 apparently

The only part I hate: Goldfinger is sucked out a tiny window. As soon as he gets stuck, the suction stops. But they show him going through; it wouldn’t happen

I loved GOLDFINGER, even though I never was/never became a fan of the series or the character. Bond just seemed to be too much of a too self-consciously "cool" character which, if not then, but certainly by now reads more as campy or a bit corny. He was never all that interesting, even though Connery came across as pretty likable screen presence. The actor's personality seemed to comet through, and the idea that he didn't take the role as serious drama, but as a fun sort of thing. The whole series was just too formulaic (though I've only seen a few of the movies). But I still DO really like the 3rd film. That was sufficient for me., just that single film....but I realize i'm in a minority.

I saw this film at a smallish art theater about ten years after its first release, and when the Union Jack parachute popped out, the whole place exploded in cheers. As far as I'm concerned, that was THE iconic moment.

Great video. it will be recomended in my next vid

Sean Connery's last bond film was Never Say Never Again. This point demolishes the entire hypothesis.

Collins did such a great job revoicing Froebe that I never noticed until it was pointed out in some dvd bonus material, and being German myself, I've known Froebe's original voice from a lot of his movies.

Tempted to make the running title card for it

8:02 The microfilm could have been made before the assassination. It could have detailed the plot to assassinate JFK.

That opening scene with the crowd singing and dancing to We Will Rock You is so jarring. Such a good movie though. I first saw it on DVD when it was first released in that format and bought a copy shortly afterwards.

Thank you for taking the time to research and for sharing it.

I'm guessing that the director did not want a movie poster showing the tattoo.

Just the opening - Connery in a wet suit, blowing shit up, then taking off to reveal a white tuxedo, takes out a carnation, puts it in his lapel, enters a bar and lights up a smoke. I mean who wouldn't want to be that guy? So many great lines "do you expect me to talk? No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die!!" . And come on - "Pussy Galores flying circus"? Easily. Hands down. By a mile - the best Bond film.

Maybe it's down to the era I grew up in (virtually my entire teen years, obviously when you are forming your taste in movies, music etc, fell in the 80s), but my two all time favourite Bond movies are FYEO and Octopussy (I love the two Dalton flics as well). I don't even mind the circus!

Pierce Brosnan spoke for many of their first viewing of "Goldfinger".

I don't know about the glowing comments here, but I just downloaded the 14.5gb version from google drive and it's frankly unwatchable. I mean the file is really corrupted or something, because it's very jittery and lagging in places (not the audio, just the picture) with some scenes becoming heavily pixelated for a second or two. After ten minutes of this, my eyes were starting to go funny, I just had to turn it off. It's very bad. I'm using VLC media player to play the mp4 file.

I think Jaws might be more well known than Oddjob.

well... after seeing the TROLOLO video... everything is possible with russians

Cause Alan Partridge says so

"Aitch or Haich" LOL

I don't think the nuclear bomb does anything but create another plot hole. Why would the gold be any less valuable now it glows in the dark?

Bond is White because Blacks and Whites ARE different. A Black Bond WILL soon mean CHANGING the character, FILMS to more please the more Black audience thus less pleasing the White audience. So a DIFFERENT character. Maybe not the first film, or the first actor, but soon after. James Bond is White, or not James Bond. SO he will probably not be White, not James Bond, because White haters/ females will probably have been GIVEN the decision.

Goldfinger was the first Bond film with all the iconic elements. The credits, music, car, gadgets, women etc.

Fort Knox was a *set*?!

I would steal it to

Disclaimer: I *love* Goldfinger, but I do see a problem with it - and it's not really the movie's fault. IMO, almost all newer Bond movies were like re-mixes of a small number of early, franchise-defining films. You can find elements from Dr No, Russia, Goldfinger, Thunderball and YOLT in most films that came after those very early movies. "Spy Who Loved Me" for example is basically a re-hash of YOLT when it comes to the villain's evil plan. It's also no coincidence, IMO, that the Austin Powers series only spoofed aspects of the very early Bond-era in all its three entries: Mid to late 1960s setting/look, evil organization, over-the-top main villain, cartoonishly strong henchman using a weird form of weapon, etc, etc... it's all there. Meaning that when I watch more modern Bond-flicks I can't help but be reminded that the franchise has basically been going in circles for decades and that when I watch early flicks like Goldfinger, the cliched stuff in there stands out way more than it should to me. And probably way more than it would have to a mid/late 1960s audience. Out of the early ones, I've come to appreciate "Russia" and "Majesty's" more and more over the years. "Russia" in particular seems downright restrained in comparison to even some other Connery-entries and also more like an actual spy-thriller. Out of the newer ones, I do enjoy the Dalton entries (highly underrated leading man, IMO) and, of course, "Casino Royale". Such a shame that the Craig era couldn't really deliver after such a strong opening effort. My own theory is that CR probably benefited a lot from the fact that they could work off an original story that hadn't been used before in the EON-canon. It also had the perfect balance between grittiness and humor without seeming like it was trying to be gritty or humorous.

"They'll copyright claim the living daylights out of me" LOL

Awesome video! One correction : Harold Sekata was Hawaiian not Japanese.

I mean, who throws a hat? Honestly!

Fiat 500 use by lupin 3rd and Tom cruise

You are missing a key point about the car crushing scene - that was a 1964 Lincoln Continental. At the time of the film, this was one of the most desirable and high profile luxury cars available. Almost considered a work of art. The point of scene is to highlight Goldfinger's wealth and callous behavior, specifically his willingness to part with something so great so easily. It's to make it clear that if he can do that, he can anything i.e. kill 40,000 people in his scheme. It's to make him look more dangerous. Allegedly, some of the film crew cried when they watched the car being crushed.

How could you forget Louis Jourdan's delightfully over-the-top reading of the line, "Octopussy....Oc-to-pussy." You know that he had a ball delivering that one!

just wanna say after watching it (of course I own all the stuff so I'm allowed to) THIS IS AMAZING! you've literally saved the show... I loved the show but I had my issues with it, whilst your movie is probably my favorite ''Star Wars story''! Well done to you guys<3 PLUS the last fight... WOW, absolutely amazing. The original was epic but this version made me cry.

It was us that wanted a caravan...