Love how everyone complains this has fixed lugs. THAT IS THE POINT!!!!!!!! Quit even bringing it up.
@dunderhay916923 сағат бұрын
It's certainly different, too large of course, but I like the case finish and crystal. The thing that bugs me is watches where the hands never pass over acres of dial, the rectangular extension is completely vacant apart from the name, for the money they could have added a power reserve, small seconds or something in that area, but that would require a new movement and decreased profit margin 🙄
@derosa1989Күн бұрын
It's an interesting and well crafted design for sure. They should have been a bit more bold and made it a little smaller.
@Cloud_KenКүн бұрын
It looks like my neighbors window when we were playing backyard baseball
@WatcheswithDennisКүн бұрын
I never cracked a window playing ball. ⚾
@underachievingwatchcollect1878Күн бұрын
Finally, a watch for the Oligarch who has everything 😎.
@ScottyPinballКүн бұрын
Another Dune watch. Cool
@obesetuna3164Күн бұрын
I'm flabbergasted Dennis.! And this was inspired by a past model? It certainly has a retro sci-fi /early 70's period look about it. Perhaps we should stop joking about the boring old Royal Oak company lol.
@WatcheswithDennisКүн бұрын
Yes the first image I share in the video is the old one (with the silver dial), but don't worry I am sure AP has more lawnchairs in our future. This is but a brief reprieve.
@kojiattwoodКүн бұрын
The historical model, as usual, has much better proportions to my eye, and probably wears a lot more comfortably (much like your Ming, I would imagine that crown just digging into your wrist).
@WatcheswithDennisКүн бұрын
Perhaps this is a watch best for lefties...
@kojiattwoodКүн бұрын
@@WatcheswithDennis Hah, excellent point!
@matthewkaiser358Күн бұрын
It’s for me!
@WatcheswithDennisКүн бұрын
Dreams can come true!
@dunderhay9169Күн бұрын
Sorry I couldn't see this live, you chose interesting watches 👍. I agree the lumed case looks like a novelty toy, I like the Oris divers, but definitely too expensive as you said. The mirror dial Isotope has a really nice case design, but I agree, a reflection of the owners face every time they check the time has to be designed for narcissists.
@johnnie54422 күн бұрын
At what point is a microbrand no longer a microbrand? Monta? Christopher Ward?
@WatcheswithDennisКүн бұрын
Sadly, no one entirely agrees on the answer because there isn't a single, clear-cut definition of microbrand. I don't consider Christopher Ward a microbrand anymore, for example, but I see plenty of others feel it still is.
@aaronw45372 күн бұрын
The 1860 has a guilloché dial which will also contribute to the higher price.
@scottgoldberg23983 күн бұрын
since you mentioned yard work … Them Your Sticks!
@WatcheswithDennis3 күн бұрын
This time indeed they were!
@VBJoeMo3 күн бұрын
The Credor for $12k in Ti and limited ed is interesting. I agree that the Alpine Eagle is better looking dial. I'd be interested in the feel of this bracelet and the weight on wrist in Ti. I'd not cross off but would not be my top pick
@WatcheswithDennis3 күн бұрын
The weight is an important factor it should be quite comfortable (I'd worry about the case shape but with the crown position I think it's a non-issue). I'd rather a dress watch from Credor regardless but I'm biased in favor of those anyway. I had never seen this design before though so always nice to view something new.
@underachievingwatchcollect18783 күн бұрын
Who asked for a lumed case? Why???
@WatcheswithDennis3 күн бұрын
Even the strap! For all that pitch black watch donning.
@nikolastojanov87492 күн бұрын
This is a type of watch you buy to go to a rave for rich people with. Disco parties in general. Cant think of other use case for this
@Cloud_Ken3 күн бұрын
I thought the exact same, it reminds me of the toys and snacks as a kid. Lume is really overrated, makes it look cheap more than anything. I dont know if id even buy a moonswatch if it glowed in the dark.
@WatcheswithDennis3 күн бұрын
Rolex should do a full lume case, lean into it as for kids. Call it the Totmaster.
@Cloud_Ken3 күн бұрын
Kids would smash or crack the ceramic, it has to be investable/hoardable
@WatcheswithDennis3 күн бұрын
@@Cloud_Ken it will be just for very well-behaved kids. We can make this work!
@nightstalker8244 күн бұрын
Can't believe i watched this. Watch community can be toxic. Like high school girls taking sides and pointing fingers. Who cares? Just wear the damn watch..
@subtractivemusic4 күн бұрын
Good video
@TheBimmer744 күн бұрын
I ordered this watch but the crown was very wobbly, so I returned it. Baltic paid for the return label, and their customer service was fantastic. Even though the watch didn't work out, the experience left a positive experience, and I may give them another try.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
Nice to here. I recall reading about wobby crowns maybe on Reddit. I didn't notice any wobble here but it was tough to screw down (used a toothbrush on the threads and that helped so must have been some contamination but the crown doesn't feel great regardless, a bit sharp for a screw-down format in my opinion).
@dscotp1854 күн бұрын
I am not a Fautina fan, but that is a nice looking watch overall. Enjoy.
@kojiattwood4 күн бұрын
Awesome; looks like it will be a great summer watch.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
Yeah the tropical color should be a fun one for outdoor casual.
@killertaxi1004 күн бұрын
Nice choice Dennis! Looking forward to your review of your Baltic!
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
Thanks I will probably work one up late next week or early the week after.
@Nefville4 күн бұрын
Congrats Dennis! I can see you indeed were missing that Tudor Bronze! I do like this one, its a very cohesive design. Wear it in good health as they say! PS I'm a huge fan of that movement but you might not be, its a unidirectional winding movement. I have several watches with it and I never notice it but I know you had that Hamilton disaster of a watch so just a heads up. I really like the watch so I hope its not an issue.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
Oh I already shook the thing. The rotor movement is detectable but not even as extreme as Orient. My biggest issue has been the crown. It was hard to screw down, like it felt done and then still had more to go. Hit the threads with a toothbrush and it seems some debris was in there because it got a lot better. Crown is awfully sharp but that isn't the movement's fault (I did add some watch grease I have to the threads as well but the toothbrush seemed to provide the notable improvement).
@Nefville4 күн бұрын
@@WatcheswithDennis I had the same issue of a sharp crown on my Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical and I just took the fine side of a nail file and smoothed it out a bit. You would never know to look at it but now its not tearing up the back of my hand. I'm not sure if you want to do that or not but bronze is pretty hard, it should be difficult to overdo it.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
@@Nefville oh that is clever! I will see how it is when I am not constantly testing the screw-down aspect as that is what did it. Unscrewing and time-setting were effortless and after brushing the threads I think it may close easy enough that it won't irritate my thumb. But filing should be pretty risk-free since it isn't plated.
@obesetuna31644 күн бұрын
Hi Dennis. After taking the micro-brand plunge, this looks like a nice choice.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
It'll be interesting to review. Definitely can see where the money is saved in some elements but the visual package looks pretty good.
@VBJoeMo4 күн бұрын
Great looking watch. Congratulations. I just bought my first Tudor - the Black Bay 41 with the smooth bezel. Also, a no date.
@Nefville4 күн бұрын
Congrats! I have the 36mm silver dial Black Bay, wearing it now actually. The only complaint I have is the clasp being too long but other than that over the last 3ish years its been great.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
Tudor makes some very nice watches. I can already say the movement and winding experience on my Tudor bronze greatly exceeds this Baltic (I actually struggled to fully screw the crown in; used a toothbrush and it is better so I think there was some contamination on the threads originally but it is sharp and unrefined compared to the Tudor crown which I think is great).
@stevem8635 күн бұрын
Great view point.
@trujr52955 күн бұрын
Used to be best blog ever. amd C&C does provide excellent service. But yes, It feels awkward owning all those things. Don't trust them anymore.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
At least their old library remains available. I used to browse C&C a lot (I have shopped at a number of the big second hand dealers but never bought from C&C). I've quit checking since I noticed they aren't really getting new inventory.
@ViolinistWilliam5 күн бұрын
Fantastic video Dennis, I didn’t expect to watch the whole thing twice but did. You are right: they need to acquire credibility like Jack Forster, they need to get the hell out of selling watches, and they have to change their culture totally. It’s going to take leadership just like in all of our businesses. Am I optimistic? No.
@WatcheswithDennis5 күн бұрын
No, I think you are right. They want blood from this stone (and the stone is selling watches).
@PocketWatchTime5 күн бұрын
Similar to Hodinkee and selling watches they review… I don’t trust Teddy Baldassarre
@WatcheswithDennis5 күн бұрын
But his b-roll looks great!
@peterwoodaman59364 күн бұрын
I’ve bought numerous watches from teddy he is legit and his customer service was amazing on the business side.
@WatcheswithDennis4 күн бұрын
@@peterwoodaman5936 I have only heard positive things about his business professionalism. It's the notion that his videos about the watches he sells being truly objective that I (and I believe others) question.
@PocketWatchTime4 күн бұрын
@@peterwoodaman5936 I absolutely do not doubt that. I’m sure his customer service is unmatched… It has to be. If a middleman has bad service… He won’t be the middleman for long. I have no issues with his business… I just have issues with the possibility of less truth regarding a watch secondary to his financial interest.
@dr.kevinmoore8889Күн бұрын
@WatcheswithDennis This is exactly it. He makes great informative videos but I do not feel that he is objective at all. I feel that he promotes the brands that he sells over other brands
@Lifeperhour945 күн бұрын
Honestly my input would be if you don’t want to dip into microbrands would be to get into independents. You get the flavour without too much of the risk as they’re more or less established.
@WatcheswithDennis5 күн бұрын
Yes, I have considered that route. But enough people have raised good microbrand points I have one en route as I type this!
@Nicholas-V5 күн бұрын
I completely agree about Jack although I think he was more of a canary in the coal mine. He didn’t like the direction things were going so he left. Then the quality dropped even more without him.
@WatcheswithDennis5 күн бұрын
I think this is the case. Especially since he was editor-in-chief. Though I do wonder if budget cuts hit the writing staff salary (maybe not him, but if anyone was in a position to offer him more it was probably 1916 which has experimented with bringing in popular watch commentators, with mixed results).
@koolpep5 күн бұрын
As long as LVMH Group is a shareholder - how can they be independent if they are partially owned by a group that owns Zenith, LV, Tiffany, Bulgari, TAG Heuer and Hublot?
@WatcheswithDennis5 күн бұрын
If LVMH is a minority shareholder the rest of Hodinkee could change direction even if LVMH objects. They also could sell their stake in the company (especially if they viewed their investment as a gamble that didn't pay off it might already be of low interest to them at this current stage). But yes, the suspicion of bias or influence will likely always exist so long as LVMH has a significant stake in Hodinkee.
@koolpep5 күн бұрын
@@WatcheswithDennis Yes, that's what I meant. They would always be suspected of bias. Which as a retailer they are anyways so it's all a bit tricky. However, 1916 Company (Watchbox) has created a good educational content that is due to it's neutral nature very respected.... but it's not really reviews but descriptions of the details.
@earlbee31966 күн бұрын
The movement is atrocious.
@Pixelpunch36 күн бұрын
I think you’re on point. The steps that you mentioned are pretty much the only way for Hodinkee to survive and hopefully get back to what they once used to be when they were respected, or at least more respected.
@WatcheswithDennis5 күн бұрын
I think they will be pushing on the watch sales no matter what. But we can always hope!
@Pixelpunch35 күн бұрын
@@WatcheswithDennis yeah I guess we’ll see and you’re probably right. Up to them though if they don’t want to improve their business model lol
@Stona9996 күн бұрын
Sorry you ran into such bad luck with the build quality on a couple of those. Nothing sours me more than a flaw in a new watch.
@WatcheswithDennis6 күн бұрын
I've come to accept it happens more than I first thought. I have become more tolerant of this as I've owned more watches but I've also had better servicing experience with the higher end pieces. The Hamilton though... I've still never brought myself to buy another watch from that brand.
@davidelliott9486 күн бұрын
Good advice!😊
@derosa19896 күн бұрын
In the watch space, being Rolex just gets better and better. The watch media is not an area i'd want to work or invest in, when a KZfaqr or IG account can create a business that competes with Hodinkee for a fraction of their cost.
@WatcheswithDennis6 күн бұрын
I assume this is part of why they diversified so much. Ad revenue only goes so far. But I think it is very hard when you start selling what you are reviewing. Of course you can argue about segregated roles (like newspapers and their ad divisions) but when you see entities like Hodinkee softballing all the reviews I find it suspect to trust their credibility.
@Nefville6 күн бұрын
We kind of touched on the topic of journalistic integrity during the microbrand livestream and from what I can tell all the major watch publications with the exception of ABlogtoWatch are anathema to criticizing watches or watch brands. They absolutely will not do it and I think that's what you can expect when reviewers are handed the product they are supposed to be reviewing from the company that made it. They think if they say something negative the brands will never send them another watch to review. Compounding the issue further for Hodinkee, they have business relationships with the brands they are selling or collaborating with, and even further still, if the criticism is of a watch they themselves are selling, they'll be even more likely to paint an overly rosy picture of it. What you end up with is an 'article' that is nothing more than a fancy description of a watch in Hodinkee's store. IMO Hodinkee's entire model is flawed, they bought C&C VERY high but somehow those are not mistakes. Seems Ben Clymer is anathema to criticism of himself as well.
@WatcheswithDennis6 күн бұрын
I mean I avoided touching on the ego of making his own G-Shock collab around his name like he is a rock star (but I stuck that Easter Egg in the thumbnail). I mean he must feel like one he made millions off Hodinkee. I think he thinks he did it once he can do it again (and he has upped his involvement recently) but I think he will find repairing a brand is harder than starting one.
@kojiattwood6 күн бұрын
The writing, so to speak, was on the wall before the C&C acquisition when virtually all their reputable and wonderful writers left, as you rightly pointed out
@WatcheswithDennis6 күн бұрын
It is when I started only using them as an occasional source for news. But maybe they could wash the wall clean and start fresh. But I think they are going to try and find a new way to make selling watches work.
@underachievingwatchcollect18786 күн бұрын
Aah……………………..losing trust and credibility in the watch community plus having an inventory of devalued watches-Hodinkee is dead 💀! They lost me with the $6000 travel clock.
@WatcheswithDennis6 күн бұрын
It seems the infamous travel clock ranks up there with Seiko misaligned bezels for damage to a brand's reputation!
@chaosgamer71176 күн бұрын
Moser was founded 1828 (sry for being the bitch to cerrect u )
@WatcheswithDennis6 күн бұрын
Corrections always welcome! Moser is a bit odd because it was defunct and then revived (I think in 2005) and then the current approach I think started with investor bailout in 2012. So there isn't a steady through-line for the brand dating back to its original creation.
@SaSpursFan7 күн бұрын
I agree
@A9MI1IM3T3R7 күн бұрын
Can you give your thoughts on Christopher Ward? I am a fan of the Trident Pro 300 and I own the black dial 42mm
@WatcheswithDennis7 күн бұрын
I haven't owned any CW watches as they have not appealed to me. I have heard very good things about the watch quality (cannot think of a model I have heard issues with) but have heard complaints related to their customer service (but nothing to the level of Yema).
@ScottyPinball8 күн бұрын
Sorry I missed the livestream, I lost track of time admiring my BB58 movement. In this phase of my watch journey, I have little to no interest in micro brands. It seems that these appeal to those who like homages at a lower price than an original or if you have everything and you like to check out some oddities.
@WatcheswithDennis8 күн бұрын
Haha, enjoy the in-houseness! A lot are the homage approaches and the near-on clones do not appeal to me. Similar takes with their own twist I am fine with but ideally only if their twist is superior. There are a lot of acceptable designs but I think I lean to them with the more fun takes (bronze, colorful dials that I would only wear on occasion, etc.). Otherwise might as well save for a Tudor or similar for something to wear regularly. But of course that does cost more and some will not be comfortable with that.
@killertaxi1008 күн бұрын
Out of your narrowed down choices, I think that red dial Farer Aqua Compressor is a stunner! If the Aussie dollar wasn't in the toilet, I'd be very tempted to get one myself!
@WatcheswithDennis8 күн бұрын
Yes, I've been sorely tempted to try out an internal dive bezel format watch. If I end up going that route Farer is the most likely candidate.
@alanwright31728 күн бұрын
Denis my wallet thanks you 😜 That leaves my wish list at six not including the two watches on order (Erebus Ascent + Loresom LSO4) AND the Mr Jones Watches Mare Adesso I just bought😱 Cheers mate!
@WatcheswithDennis8 күн бұрын
Haha it wasn't my goal to drive people into buying even *more* watches! But I've been exploring other models ever since doing the livestream so I guess that is the fate of all of us in this hobby.
@yr51359 күн бұрын
I gotta say when I saw an advertisement for this watch it made me buy my first watch. I managed to find something as similar as possible within my budget.
@WatcheswithDennis8 күн бұрын
I'm glad it could serve as a useful inspiration. There are quite a few interesting watches with guilloché patterns, and small-second functions, out there and I think we're seeing a lot more appear at the more affordable end of the spectrum. This isn't my favored combination but it is resonating with a lot of collectors.
@jbizzlemysizzle8 күн бұрын
@yr5135 what did you end up getting? I really like the guilloche pattern and the color, but the price is pretty out there. I'm wondering what might be similar.
@thegorn9 күн бұрын
Christopher Ward’s customer support and tracking is atrocious, but the quality of their timepieces is fantastic, based on two purchases I made. Both times the fit and finish was incredible but yeah - the buying experience wasn’t great. This was two 39mm Sealanders - one a 3 hander, and the other a GMT. Their designs over time are getting better, but their prices are also going up. That’s the whole industry though. I think they are onto a good thing though, and I wish them well.
@WatcheswithDennis8 күн бұрын
I've heard mostly good things from the owners. Most of CW's designs I don't tend to favor (in terms of their more original stuff) and the others I've found myself indifferent towards. But they are working on a lot of new projects it seems so they might win me over with something eventually.
@EbaidaclovislLegend9 күн бұрын
So excellent
@Nicholas-V10 күн бұрын
I really like the Serica Watches designs but I have some concerns about the reliability of the Soprod movements they use. I’ll need to do more research before I pull the trigger.
@alanwright31728 күн бұрын
I was scared off by the original movement fiasco and bought a "chlomage" because I liked the 5303. Serica now have all their watches COSC certified so they should be OK now.
@WatcheswithDennis8 күн бұрын
I'm afraid I have no experience with Soprod so I can't share any anecdotal, first-hand thoughts.