Don't get used to it =)

e

e

e

e

yeah, waste of natural resources

Paweł Pakura i k r

@@pawepakura5404 , seriously😕😕😕

Some people

@@willmar1461 seriously. Cause i'm kind of person, that usually brings back to kerbin around 500-1000 dv :D without nuclear engines :D

and it isn`t a can with a seat, which also matters

Check out kergarian aerospace grand tour. Sure, it's way more massive, but its comfy and looks great.

Ugly one at that. But one that works.

He said he did a multiple gravity assist to get to laythe, but even still it is a very well made ship

Alex Towers the jool system assists are actually pretty easy since the moons are large and near each other

Lmao so true

Brad da man

Lmao! I have one of them. Regular graphing calc features but so many things to program on it.

Actually it was an N-Spire II

Espen Hansen or, no separation, Eeloo SSTO.

That's pretty easy to do with an SSTO

@@serbianspaceforce6873 seperatron, the tiny SRB, not separation.

or: I went to KLO using only sepatrons

no don't give him idea

I can guarantee that 130 of those years were just in the mining alone; look at the jump from immediately after landing and immediately before takeoff. On Vall, it's a 12-year jump.

@@Derpy-qg9hn Exactly

ShadowZone I’m in the process of going to every planet single launch no refueling including jool and eve

Not on this channel though

Dude you are right. Best challange ever!

Using a life support mod could also help

Quick question: Are you talking about player/RL time or in-game/mission time? In other words, are you trying to take the most direct possible path, or just the path that requires the least work so you can time warp through everything else? I personally think mission time is the better challenge. There are two problems with mission time: It basically completely ignores things like landing/take-off and, to lesser extent, refueling times since those are irrelevant compared to orbit time, and the second problem only applies to many-destination missions. You basically need to choose a launch time which provides the best possible alignment for all the planets in-sequence. The thing is, while the perfect alignment exists and due to the irrational (or near irrational, the fact that it's technically rational will create insignificant issues) it is attainable with *some* amount of waiting before launch (this statement is basically an extension of the idea of Fourier series), actually waiting that long would take far too long with the meager 100,000x time acceleration of KSP, so you'd need to cheat to place the planets in the right position.

@@yaksher I'm talking about mission time. I think waiting for a perfect launching window is legit and also a necessary thing if you want to be more time efficient. With that been said, it will be pretty impressive if someone can start the mission from day 0 in KSP. The reason I propose such challenge is because, in real world case, mission time probably is one of, if not the most important thing that we need to take into consideration. Sure, it is cool if you can visit several planets with a small SSTO and save a lot of money. But, if it would take a century to finish it will be meaningless (think about inflation... You get the idea).

@@Pierce1996h It will be cool. But I think Bradley mainly do stock challenges and I won't expect too much for a kick starter in this area :)

bestPlayer_xu booo

Don't worry they have nebula

@bestPlayer_xu Yeah but that wont work beyond the Kerbin system

One of my first videos on KZfaq was of a grand tour if you really want to dig into the back catalog =P

The delta-v requirements will be legendary :P

Mission time requirements is more of a "waiting for correct transfer windows" problem and less of an engineering problem

it would be both, as you could decide to skip one transfer window, but sacrifice DV.

Im trying to figure out how to make an SSTO :P

@Guilhem Mollier i made an SSTO plane now :D It is quite efficient, it has 40 parts (i dont remember the mass, but its less than 30 tons) and made it to LKO and then did a intercontinental trip with the remaining fuel Also i did a trip between the desert and the KSC in 5 minutes with that plane

@@luizfernando4497 My first SSTO was built to service one of my space stations.

It's my second favorite, my favorite is Laythe.

They have it, it just buffers a lot.

Don't worry they have skillshare

Its all about optimization, which is all about math. Fortunately, my background is also all about math.

@@BradleyWhistance ok, thanks. Optimization is important, getting the most out of every fuel tank and engine

But how did you manage to fulfill the power needs of drill, converter and radiator with only one RTG?

@@JYF921 Patiently

@@notfeedynotlazy Well put

Um brasileiro aqui?! Aí sim :D

@@davisdf3064 Não perco um vídeo dele :D

@@Cenourafnord Tamo junto :D

Cyne 😳

Natend Tetris 😳

Or the Sigma Initiative by Stratzenblitz

This would be interesting

When we can find a fuel source that can be found literally anywhere in the solar system And biological immortality And rocket parts that don’t get damaged by sliding on a planet’s surface.

@@alexsiemers7898 when we find a guy who doesnt ruin the fun

yes