The Type 45 is such a wicked ship. I think the Russians were actually seeing how many targets the warship could track/engage at once. I don't think they liked the answer they got.
@micheal6898 Жыл бұрын
the fact that they where detecting them when they where where practically taking off....... yeah these ships are scary.
@allybally0021 Жыл бұрын
Were they? That could have been information from another source.
@Rose.Of.Hizaki Жыл бұрын
@@allybally0021 it is reported that the Sampson and S1850M radars that the HMS Duncan are equipped with have a 400km/250mile range. The video states that the HMS Duncan was 30miles off the coast of Crimea which was the direction of where the jets came from. So you could say that HMS Duncan had them on radar as soon as they took off and climbed to an altitude that could seen by the radars. The Russian pilots would have known they were on radar as well as their avionics would have detected it and warned them if they were being pinged or targeted/locked up by other radars. Those MIGs could have avoided radar detection by staying really low to the ground but i don't think the kremlin and Crimean citizens would appreciate 17 jets almost going supersonic at tree level fly over their heads. Ive heard a flight of four or five F-15s fly overhead pretty low and slow and even those were pretty loud. I wouldnt want even one of them to go supersonic at tree level right above me
@allybally0021 Жыл бұрын
@@Rose.Of.Hizaki Hi I appreciate your thoughts. I think it all depends on the radar lobes, altitude and terrain when they would be acquired. Maybe they were picked-up as soon as they took-off but I suspect there are supplementary sources of this information. The idea of low altitude flights are not that remarkable though. Military jets regularly follow terrain at 250ft agl (or much lower in truth) and whilst noisy it is nothing new. They would not need to be supersonic or anything near it. Most are circa 450knots on dry thrust.
@Rose.Of.Hizaki Жыл бұрын
@@allybally0021 Well, its all speculation but im sure the MoD as well as the captain and navigators on board the ship knew that the airfield was there and it would be easy to correlate between the location of the airfield on the map and where the dots suddenly appeared on the radar - although they could have also come from a different airfield but nobody knows apart from the ships crew or maybe the film crew. Since it tv shows like these often exaggerate tensions because thats what brings in the views. The same way people tune in to Kitchen Nightmares with Gordon Ramsey. While i did say that the radar onboard the Duncan has pretty long range. I guess for most of us, that is theoretical as terrain and tall buildings can mess with the actual distance. ---- even if not supersonic. Jets are still loud and depending on the country youre from. There are rules or laws in place that restrict jets from going too fast due to the noise especially if the airfield is located near to a heavily populated area or the jets need to fly over populated areas to get where they need to go. At least here n the UK there are altitude and distance requirements that restrict jets from going supersonic over heavily populated areas unless it was an emergency like the Jets needed to go and intercept something -- and sonic booms are LOUD and can be heard for absolutely miles. UK airspace is limited to 250knots under 10000ft. 17 jets flying super low to the ground still isnt a fun experience. At least for the people on the ground. You can make the argument of an airshow but i dont think the organisers would let 17 jets buzz the spectators at tree level.
@mikemesser4326 Жыл бұрын
Very likely. Probably while they were still on the ground.
@killman3695472 жыл бұрын
In an actual attack the attacking aircraft don't usually stick around. As soon as they were in range they would pop off all of their missiles and run for home
@michaelcraig8860 Жыл бұрын
They got picked up as they were taking off. They wouldn't have got anywhere near to launching any missile before they were shot down.
@amuxpatch2798 Жыл бұрын
@@michaelcraig8860 Dream on, Russians jets would have launched sea skimming anti ship long missiles from 50 to 100km (multiple launches of missiles) , at least dozen missiles would have hit the RAN ship ,the rest taken out by the ship's anti missile systems.
@mattia8327 Жыл бұрын
@@amuxpatch2798 lol, cope russia is a paper tiger
@isziahs5951 Жыл бұрын
@@pymathus2283 shows what weakness? the only weakness being shown is Russia in Ukraine
@Just-Ignore-It_88 Жыл бұрын
@@isziahs5951 What has Ukraine got to do with this video???
@Pippins666 Жыл бұрын
In early spring in the mid 70's HMS Bacchante sailed in complete radio and radar silence around the North Cape, and as far as the White Sea. It was so cold the sea began freezing around the ship, and I had to keep the Seacat launcher running to keep the hydraulic oil warm, or at least not so cold that the breaker tripped. The reason the crew was given was that the Russians had been hassling our trawlers in the area. I'm not convinced of that! We reached the White Sea undetected (probably probing defences was our real reason). At which point we could have returned undetected. However there is no point going there and not leaving a calling card. We turned on the navigation radar for just one revolution, and within 15 minutes there were planes and ships everywhere! Exciting times!
@yorkshire_tea68757 ай бұрын
Heard the launches had problems in the Falklands. Guessing that could've been a result of cold weather aswell
@seanbrewer27037 ай бұрын
Foolish in hindsight to give them a free radar ping. Now they know the frequency
@Pippins6667 ай бұрын
@@seanbrewer2703 on the contrary, they know all our frequencies, as we know there's. The whole point was to give them the heads up we had got there undetected
@bentucker23017 ай бұрын
@@seanbrewer2703just no...
@samward92944 жыл бұрын
“We have you 17 to 1.” “I like those odds”
@ns73534 жыл бұрын
2 missiles for each plane isnt enough is it?
@samward92944 жыл бұрын
SNP Alba forever dw about it man
@TheLastCrumb.4 жыл бұрын
But only if you can get them all before just one gets you
@MrOlegvd3 жыл бұрын
@Brit Mk 2 only takes 1 missile per pirate, and there will be no one to provoke.
@moskoviaulus2813 жыл бұрын
@@ns7353 That's too much
@ABLYamimash38 ай бұрын
"They have 17 aircraft, we have 48 missiles. I think we're gonna win". Too right!
@FXT1307 ай бұрын
Not a single missile can hit the jets.
@liammoy59117 ай бұрын
@@FXT130 Tell that to the Argentines. And with a type 42, not a 45.
@PotatoSalad6147 ай бұрын
@@FXT130every missile will hit the jets, they travel at Mach 4.5
@FXT1307 ай бұрын
@@liammoy5911 Russia is not Argentina duffer. They were poorly equiped but still they able to sink one British Ship.
@FXT1307 ай бұрын
@@PotatoSalad614 Speed is not everything too hit a jet. It is not a stationary object and every jets also carry minimum 6-8 missile. If it so easy to attack Russia than war monger country like Britain will never miss that opportunity.
@kevinhunkin6364 Жыл бұрын
I’m ex RAF…….Doing some number crunching using info from the internet Duncan could have launched 20 missiles and shot down all 17 aircraft within 60-90 seconds and the radar is so powerful it would fry aircraft electronics and sterilise the pilots at 2 miles. Lucky Russians
@leonardhpls67 ай бұрын
How far out could the jets engage the ship ?
@kevinhunkin63647 ай бұрын
@@leonardhpls6 The SU-34 was carrying bombs and the 20 x SU-30 if they were carrying kh-31p missiles which have a claimed range of 110km (probably more). The type 45 missiles have a claimed 120km range (probably more) and the ships radar has a claimed range of 400km. They would have to launch 40+ missiles to succeed.
@kevinhunkin63644 ай бұрын
@user-el1rx3lu4q and then the missile would be targeted
@Fedaykin24 Жыл бұрын
0:30 Funnily the shout after the BBC reporter explains it is for another plane was for a surface ship radar. Top Plate is the radar fitted to Russian warships, Slotback is the radar fitted to the SU-27 Flanker and Dropkick is the radar fitted to the SU-24.
@DrSteveGames2 жыл бұрын
There’s a reason nato like to have a type 45 with all fleet deployments.
@dogekoko9865 Жыл бұрын
type 45 are useless agaisnt other ships
@ynwa3476 Жыл бұрын
@doge koko Hence why other ships are there too ! The Type 45 protects the fleet from air attack ! Wake up.
@Nozxoki Жыл бұрын
@@dogekoko9865 It's almost like 1 ship isnt supposed to do everything because theyre in fleets with multiple other ships that each have their own specialised purpose
@dogekoko9865 Жыл бұрын
@Iain Campbell type 45s have slow moving non stealthy missle and there are only 8 of them mean while russian ships have mach 4 kitchen missles that penetrate air defences easily
@dogekoko9865 Жыл бұрын
@@ynwa3476 i know i specified that it is not good against anti ships and are only a anti air assest
@Fester_ Жыл бұрын
From Navy Lookout July 6th 2021 MBDA announced today that the Type 45 destroyers will be enhanced with 24 Sea Ceptor missile cells. Here we consider the implications of this significant upgrade to the Royal Navy’s primary air defence platform. The Integrated Review published in March 2021 promised enhancements to the Sea Viper missile system, but the news that Type 45s will receive additional missiles is a big step forward and a welcome surprise. A new 24-missile Sea Ceptor silo will be added in front of the current 48-missile Sylver VLS silo (See speculative mockup above), increasing the overall missile capacity from 48 to 72. Not only does this raise overall missile numbers by 50%, but also offers the potential to increase the range and reach of the existing Sea Viper system.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
The fitment of Sea Ceptor was tragically cancelled (put back indefinitely) leaving Type 45 very vulnerable to close in attack. The Sea Ceptor systems share 80% of parts with Sky Sabre which were prioritised instead for shipment to the Polish/Ukraine border.
@Fester_ Жыл бұрын
@@LondonSteveLee The all important underground wealth in the East of Ukraine.
@lukeallison37138 ай бұрын
In an ideal world, that space is used for its original intent, fitted for 16 extra Sylver A 70 or 16 MK 41 strike length cells. 6-8 of the 48 curren a 50 cells could quadpack sea ceptor, and the a70 cells could be used for FC/ASW or more Asters
@c695044 жыл бұрын
Gta online in one vid
@damiensteiner9919 Жыл бұрын
Incredible professionalism. I live in Falmouth now with its illustrious naval history of heroes. Here I see more heroes & a technological masterpiece
@SAGAWISIW30 Жыл бұрын
Yeah our nosy heroes 30 miles into hostile country a long journey from. Home 3000 kilometers away. What a waste of British pounds... they could spent billions for war but struggling to house our homeless brits🤑🤑🤑
@damiensteiner9919 Жыл бұрын
@@SAGAWISIW30 That could be achieved by curtailing the amount of immigrants flooding into our country. Great Britain has always had a proud maritime history & I for one deeply respect those who are our armed forces. We're it not for the likes of my dad who fought in WW2 you would not have been in the position to make your disrespectful comment.
@damiensteiner9919 Жыл бұрын
@@dlmdee what are you going on about?
@damiensteiner9919 Жыл бұрын
@@dlmdee Do you honestly believe we leave our country unprotected? I guess you've never played poker for money. Probably just a tubby middle aged guy with testicles the size of peanuts. My Dad fought in WW2 in the battle of El Alamein. My first cousin fought for our country. I've friends in the Royal Navy. Our shores are not undefended you total muppet
@damiensteiner9919 Жыл бұрын
@@dlmdee For your further information it's called a 'Projection of Force'. We stopped projecting around the time of the Nazi & being timid like you our country nearly was bombed into the ground. We have an elite navy. We for instance still prevent piracy & slavery. In my block of apartments lives a a Royal Marine veteran. I'm so proud of this man & anything he needs I will make sure it happens for him. Instead of being a wimp ensure that through appropriate voting we maintain a strong armed forces. An example is the so called Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank which is just the upgrade of the Challenger 2. We need a new MBT. I could go on but I doubt you would comprehend
@huntermosely74202 жыл бұрын
You can easily tell the sukhoi with its elevated cockpit. Like a MiG
@Erik-750 Жыл бұрын
Most of these airplanes now serve as a keychain.
@Stepbacktrey Жыл бұрын
I actually have a bracelet made out of Sukhoi 27
@SAGAWISIW30 Жыл бұрын
Thay have plenty titanium parts for a clkey chain the west would love to have those metals for they spy plane u2
@Tom_Cruise_Missile Жыл бұрын
@@SAGAWISIW30 u2? What do you mean? We haven't used a u2 in decades, they're completed outdated (well if you're not Russian that is lol)
@SPiderman-rh2zk Жыл бұрын
@@Tom_Cruise_Missile Well, actually that's not true. The U-2 is still in service with the 9th Recon wing and the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing. It's true the US needed titanium for the SR-71, which they acquired from the Soviet Union to make 'pizza ovens' lol
@balaclavabob001 Жыл бұрын
It's weird watching this in September of 2022 and knowing that most of those russian pilots are probably dead now and that russia was always a paper tiger .
@nuke7784 Жыл бұрын
lmao i was just thinking this, what makes it funnier is all of the comments saying that russia is a deadly force
@HydroSnips Жыл бұрын
Some of the comments are hilarious now. Burnt tanks, smashed aircraft, dead conscripts and sunken ships tell the real story of Russia’s modern military. When they started pulling out the Moisin-Nagants and 1960’s tanks you almost started feeling sorry for the stupid idiots over there still saying “yes vladi, at once” and not standing up for themselves and turning on the leadership. Ah well, war never changes.
@johnbrooks7144 Жыл бұрын
Dead? Since 2018? Hardly. They were all getting practice for sinking Her Majesty's Ships that are foolishly sent into the Black Sea. Regardless of all the agreements that the Black Sea is open waters, the fact remains that the Black Sea is a Russian pond. They control every inch of it and could easily sink every surface ship of the Royal Navy and the US Navy in about an hour and a half. The hypersonic missiles Putin introduced to the world in 2018 are indeed a game changer. All those carrier battle groups are mere defenseless targets for Russia if the west becomes stupid enough to launch on Russia. By the way, only Russia has actual air defenses rather than over-priced junk such as "Patriot" missiles that are simply a vehicle for transferring masses of currency from the taxpayer to Raytheon, Lockheed, Grumman, etc. None of the US "wonder weapons" are effective in combat as witness how things are going for the US/NATO in Ukraine. If Russia decides to fight like the US fights, i.e., flatten cities full of civilians and then send in the infantry, the Special Military Operation in Ukraine would end in about one day.
@balaclavabob001 Жыл бұрын
@@johnbrooks7144 Wow , dude. That's the most bullshit , cringe/cope propaganda I've ever seen in a reply . Things must be going really badly for putin right now ,huh? Maybe you'd like to explain how the russian navy got it's ass handed to it by a country that doesn't really have a navy of it's own or why the only thing that russia can do is launch missiles at civilians or why russia still hasn't taken Bakhmut after months of trying . If you don't want to do that then you could explain why a guy with a dead KZfaq account from 2021 thinks that people won't know he's just another worthless paid Ork troll .
@johnbrooks7144 Жыл бұрын
@@balaclavabob001 Of course, logic is completely wasted on you, but you are begging the question. You head is stuck so far up CNN's ass you may never see daylight. Things are not "going pretty bad" for Putin. His popularity rating is about 87% right now. That's higher than any US president in history. Maybe you would like to explain what you mean by "the Russian navy got its ass handed to it" because that has not happened even with the MI6 / US engineered attack on Sevastopol and Ukrop mines floating all over the Black Sea. Russia does not attack civilians or hide behind them as does the AFU, which is the sole reason Russian has not "taken" Bakhmut or Zaporizhzhia or Marinka, etc., yet. This area is now Russian territory and they are not going to give it up. Meanwhile, the civilians who elected to stay in Kherson are starving, freezing, and carrying water from the Denipro because the Zelensky cannot supply them, the AFU cannot even reposition its forces from Kherson to the north. Going to be a very interesting winter and I look forward to the day the RF takes off the gloves, shoots down the recon satellites, the P-8s, the P-3, the Brit U-2s, etc., and ends the US/NATO proxy war on Russia. You should send propane to Europe as they freeze their asses off and maybe, just maybe realize it was not in their interests to US vassals in this worldwide war to force everyone to use the massively inflated federal reserve notes as a world reserve currency. Of course you are unable to know facts or see reality, but Russia, China, India, and Iran are setting up their own exchange system, totally outside the Fed/IMF and the South American and African countries are very interested in joining them. The US, Canada, and US vassals in Europe stand alone. It gives me no delight at all and it is all a result of Zionist control of the US central government which is not and has not been a "federal" government ever since Lincoln's War on the States. So, Bobby Boy, I would say kiss my ass, but that would be impolite. May you grow a brain and figure out how to use it someday and may you realize that thing you are sucking is an appendage from Washington, District of Criminals.
@roland200020007 ай бұрын
I love the British military commanders, it's like nothings a big deal to them
@dannydonuts42193 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the air show Vladimir.
@user-os9ej3bz8k3 жыл бұрын
в следующий раз памерсов по больше возмите
@dannydonuts42193 жыл бұрын
этот
@mikeycraig89703 жыл бұрын
Theyll have to wait a few months now until theyve saved up the money to buy fuel and repairs for that many planes.
@mike_hunt47833 жыл бұрын
Vintage* airshow 😂
@FeRoOOo713 жыл бұрын
the uk crew had shitted their pants, look at the fear in their eyes
@feedyourmind6713 Жыл бұрын
The Commanders comments.. spot on leadership.
@frankthompson6503 Жыл бұрын
What a young and professional crew male and female onwards and upwards God bless you
@daddystu7046 Жыл бұрын
Indeed. Whether they should've been put in such a situation is another matter.
@ST-yv2lv Жыл бұрын
God bless the invaders lol....what were the Brits doing venturing in Crimeia?
@ZyNeEnZyNe Жыл бұрын
@@ST-yv2lv They didn't. Cope harder Ivan. Crimea is Ukranian territory too. Overdose on the copium, and seethe
@sweetdude129810 ай бұрын
@@ST-yv2lv Putin is a war criminal
@Cheese_Boi1986 Жыл бұрын
in a real war the jets can all be engaged at the same time by that class
@EnglishScripter8 ай бұрын
Yeah, not many ships can do that.
@NWEmergencySpotting2 жыл бұрын
when the CO is giving his speech he sounds like a primary school teacher after you solve a hard maths question 🤣🤣
@tango6nf477 Жыл бұрын
I disagree, its called leadership, telling your team what they did, that they did it well, and expressing appreciation. He might not be well trained in the art of speech making but he came across as sincere, if he hadn't the crew would have seen through him immediately.
@NWEmergencySpotting Жыл бұрын
@@tango6nf477 Ye it was a joke.
@equalevolution5563 Жыл бұрын
It’s quite amazing that a destroyer could take a military plane down by the plane just getting to close to its radar system. Who needs weapons when you can accidentally take out your enemy.
@dowhatyougottado9381 Жыл бұрын
Woops, sorry comrade.....or am I? 😄
@henryatkinson1479 Жыл бұрын
Except that seems to be a total lie, as in this video the aircraft were close enough to film from the deck.
@equalevolution5563 Жыл бұрын
Close but no close enough, otherwise they would have been bantha fodda.
@MaggieInABox Жыл бұрын
@@henryatkinson1479 It's the fact that radar is extremely damaging to human cells. You should never be in the direct line of a radar system as it is well documented that it causes cancer. Being that close to a 45's radar is not immediately fatal, but the exposure will lead to a massively increased risk of cancer. There's a famous story about an Australian (?) port VTS where all of the operators in the control tower kept getting groin cancers, it turned out that they were directly in line with ships incoming radars, which produce non-ionising radiation. Those were commercial ships, a 45's radar is many, many levels above that- hence the warning.
@SAGAWISIW30 Жыл бұрын
Their radar is like the weapon of James bond oo7😇
@as.98933 жыл бұрын
Never underestimate your enemy. Presume they know everything
@jameswright2974 Жыл бұрын
Uk shafted by taliban wearing sandals driving motorcycles
@RE4PER Жыл бұрын
@@jameswright2974 You forget what happened to Russia in Afghanistan.
@InternetForHomies Жыл бұрын
@@RE4PER or right now in ukraine hahahaha
@jordankerr3548 Жыл бұрын
@@jameswright2974 yeah same as America got shafted by farmers in Vietnam fall of saigon they dropped there m16s and ran fighting to climb on the ships pushing their helicopters in the sea so the communists couldn't get them
@ST-yv2lv Жыл бұрын
Russia is doing alright in Ukraine - controls over 20% The Ukraine territory...hardly a paper tiger lol What were the brits doing in Crimeia? Out on an imperialist trip? Lol they got a reality check....the Russians can and will fight back...best to get over your colonial mindset lol
@specialandroid1603 Жыл бұрын
The Duncan is a capable ship and she was'nt on her own. As part of Nato, other friendly eyes were watching everything and ready to pounce if she was attacked. Not that she would have needed any help because the captain had enough anti air missiles to take out all the Russian planes in the air.
@MC-bu6ez Жыл бұрын
It only took one Exocet missile flown from an ancient subsonic plane by the Argentine pilots to sink two navy frigates in the Falklands so let that be a timely reminder, in any case without US say so Britain can't do anything.
@Muddy.Teabagger11 ай бұрын
@@MC-bu6ez and who won in the end? and how long did that take and all so that was 1982 a lot has changed from then and warships are much better.
@EnglishScripter8 ай бұрын
Alright, so you obviously don't know what actually happened. The Exocet missile was incredibly new. No country even the USA had the capability to defend against them via ship at that time. Phalanx was still in development. That was the first modern war, no one new what was going to happen, there was no experience in that type of warfare. UK also won a war, 4 thousand miles away, launched the furthest bombing raid in history, won against an army 4x there size, while having bad logistics.@@MC-bu6ez
@goodnessobah29267 ай бұрын
Lol you know a war between NATO and Russia will end right.. don't be a clown no one wins
@locky8287 ай бұрын
@@MC-bu6ezWhat a moronic take. How could you compare this absolute pinnacle of warfare to the Falklands? Idiot
@lolagyable3 жыл бұрын
the Duncan would have smoked those fighters as that's its primary role, but in saying that, the amount of hate coming back at it would make have been a real worry. Its good no one blinked
@noodles1693 жыл бұрын
It would have been a massacre. Duncan had those jets locked onto before those jets even knew it
@Omar-df3uk3 жыл бұрын
Are you dumb? If the Russians wanted to do harm they would fire anti ship missiles outside Duncan’s Air defense range which is about 120Km(Aster30)
@lolagyable3 жыл бұрын
@@Omar-df3uk Lol, ok. What range were they at in this instance, where the Russian fighters over 120km away or were they under 10 miles, it shouldn't be too hard for you to find out, they say it in the vid, maybe you should slow the video so your little brain can hear what they say? Also you do know that, just because a missile is fired from outside of 120km, that doesn't mean the air defence system wont engage it once it comes within that range to hit the ship, you moron. The whole design of the type 45 destroyer(the Duncan in case you didn't know), was air defence, so at those closes ranges, of course it would smoke those fighters, if you don't believe me, go read up on the insane capabilities of the air defence system used on those ships. Plus if you knew anything about modern tactics, especially tactics used by the Russians, IF they had wanted to try and sink the Duncan and start ww3, they wouldn't have used fighters, they would have prob used anti-ship missiles lunched from a Bastion-P unit. So going back to what i said, the Duncan would have smoked those fighters, but there would have been alot of hate coming back, SO ITS GOOD NO ONE BLINKED. Ya dumbass.
@Omar-df3uk3 жыл бұрын
@@lolagyable I can't understand your English read my comment and try again
@Omar-df3uk3 жыл бұрын
@@lolagyable You're so brain dead the whole point is the Russian jets are that close because its a show of force not an actual battle dumb ass
@ns73534 жыл бұрын
The Brits love their Radar!
@HG694054 жыл бұрын
Johnny Diamonds Music bro it’s international waters
@joshjwillway15454 жыл бұрын
We did invent it 😂
@HG694054 жыл бұрын
Hissam Ullah training exercises, counter piracy, protection etc
@ns73534 жыл бұрын
Josh Jwillway I know that’s why this is great so British hahahah
@edc15694 жыл бұрын
@@johnnydiamondsmusic1673 Crimea, might be half way round the world in your eyes, but it's not far from the borders of EU and NATO nations. Maintaining the Black Sea's status as a global waterway is important.
@duncandl910 Жыл бұрын
I'm so happy the british navy honoured me by naming their ship after me.
In Australia we have song titled “ I love to have a beer with Duncan, coz Duncan’s mate!” Cheers Duncan from SouthAustralia
@duncandl9107 ай бұрын
@@martinmartinshaw2 happy new year Martin! Cheers!
@cynicalPixels Жыл бұрын
"30 miles off the coast"..."the crew need to find out why the jets are here".........................
@hmshood6033 жыл бұрын
Just me or russia and the UK having a bit of a fight where it's like HOLD ME BACK HOLD ME BACK
@Lu4_CWO3 жыл бұрын
Theres no need in planes at 30 miles... This is only show.
@theancientsancients17693 жыл бұрын
Watch latest incident in the news HMS Defender
@cmdrgarbage18952 жыл бұрын
Well neither Britain or Russia wants an international incident and wars are expensive
@dizzyWLRD Жыл бұрын
@@cmdrgarbage1895 welp you were wrong
@cmdrgarbage1895 Жыл бұрын
@@dizzyWLRD No i'm not, nobody wants an international incident, still.
@MrDaron7773 жыл бұрын
It's just a game, if they was about to take down this ship they would send anti ship missile not the jets since Russians are not kamikadzes.
@czhaok3 жыл бұрын
I think you heavily over estimate Russia. They have a lot of old, outdated tech. We know exactly what they do have, not what they claim to have.
@briant56852 жыл бұрын
@@czhaok their old outdates sams shot down a steathy f-117 in serbia,just try them and i can guarantee their outdated missiles which are subsonic as yours will do a marvelous job
@taylort56722 жыл бұрын
@@briant5685 Jeez, going back to 1 plane getting downed a lot of years ago to make a very outdated point
@briant56852 жыл бұрын
@@taylort5672 a 20th century sate of the art overhyped tech taken out by a 19 th century weapon,the same way overhyped f-35 or 22 would be taken out only for you to start coming up with new excuses
@johndave1172 жыл бұрын
@@taylort5672 britbonger coping 🤣
@Delboy27273 жыл бұрын
The UK daring class has the most advanced Ariel defensive systems in the world
@duurnamets96783 жыл бұрын
In your dreams
@jamesgames51323 жыл бұрын
@@duurnamets9678 your mum was😘😘😘😘
@srboslav922 жыл бұрын
LoL
@ne60412 жыл бұрын
@@duurnamets9678 You got wrecked 🤣
@soultraveller50272 жыл бұрын
Duur 😂😜🤣✌️🇬🇧
@arejay004 жыл бұрын
Nice of Russia to send its vintage Aircraft collection to welcome Duncan.
@wh17364 жыл бұрын
Axios .king Probably not, the ships only came into active service in 2013
@pimppac693 жыл бұрын
Lol those jets are far superior to anything the British have
@user-nv8om4kr4e3 жыл бұрын
Ну наши крымские Су-24М2 не такие уж и старинные ...2012 года! Они как раз носители четырёх сверхзвуковых маловысотных подарков - ПКР Х-31АД. Эти малышки как раз разрабатывались для поражения подобных фрегатов с расстояния в 160км ;)
@JohnDoe-om7xl3 жыл бұрын
@@pimppac69 we have more then enough nuclear weapons to blow you country to the afterlife tho
@danglingdave17873 жыл бұрын
@@pimppac69 Lol no there not they look like old jets we currently fly the euro fighter a very capable jet.
@marioaleksandrov78594 жыл бұрын
only 1 aircraft can send them to the bottom. that close the the land means that surface to surface and antiship missales are in range. dont wanna talk about ballistic missales.
@kaij.d73073 жыл бұрын
You ever heard of CWIS?
@user-ty9lt4ck6c3 жыл бұрын
Ты рассуждай про ракеты, а звездец придет как пришел к СССР - без всяких ракет. А этот корабль (условно говоря) тебе опять окорочков привезет, за которыми ты будешь в очереди давиться :)
@user-tb6tp7vs3y3 жыл бұрын
@@user-ty9lt4ck6c Не, ну точно говорю про сало. Тебя прям таки тянет на что нибудь съестное. Ну не хочешь сала, могу выслать тобою вожделенных окорочков. Окорока будут качественные, без ГМО и "химии", при всем при этом Маде Ин Раша. Не бойся, в твою порцию Новичка не накапаем, ты же не Скрипаль и не Навальный.
@masterbeethoven82093 жыл бұрын
@@kaij.d7307 I think you mean CIWS and i'ts not 100% effective, especially when dealing with multiple missiles.
@gitana0825 жыл бұрын
What was the HMS Duncan doing in the Black Sea? It's not 1856 anymore, the Crimean War is over. If someone tells you to meet them at Waterloo, they mean the underground station, not the battle.
@failedguy10185 жыл бұрын
gitana082 In 2014 russia annexed crimea from Ukrane. Hms d Hms duncan was probobly on a reconnasince mission.
@MeganoOdles5 жыл бұрын
Protecting Romania a NATO ally, where Duncan sometime is stationed, along with a squadron of RAF Typhoon in Constanta, Romania.
@celticguy1975314 жыл бұрын
hmmm Crimea and Waterloo ???????????? i dont get it
@edc15694 жыл бұрын
Waterloo is in Belgium you muppet.
@olegreshetin55243 жыл бұрын
@@failedguy1018 Crime is not Ukraine! UKRAINE IS NOT INDEPENDENT COUNTRY NOW! Its WESTERN VASSAL! ukraine IS PART RUSSIA occupied by WEST ! FIRST IN RUSSIAN IMPIRE, NEXT SOVIET UNION! CRIME WAS PUTTING out STATE OF RUSSIAN SOVIET FEDERATION REPUBLIK(РФСР) in 1954 by soviet leader Nikita Hrushov to state Ukranian Soviet Socialistic Repabrik(УССР) for selebrating aninivessery friendship russian and ukraine peoples! Without all rules!! Example, as ball getting out from left hand to right hand! Without Crimea people vote! Without all layer rules! Learn History! Soviet Union is broken- next Crimea back home to Russia - exUSSR(russian impire)! Ukraine is fake state building soviet communists! Western land of Ukraine is Stalin getting from Poland and other border land after WW2 in 1939-1945 ! USSR is broken- followed anticommunists trends- return this lands Poland etc!
@XantheFIN3 жыл бұрын
Wow flying Ladas. Impressive.
@GloopSerious-nt9dv3 жыл бұрын
Whaddaya fins know, you are traumatized by Russians for centuries and you will be for centuries to be...
@dreikjapan40613 жыл бұрын
try challenge these "ladas" and you will see the ending credits very soon hahaha
@GloopSerious-nt9dv3 жыл бұрын
@@dreikjapan4061 I had Lada, and it never betrayed me! Fires on on -50 fires on on +50c, crude, tough, going and undestructable xD If I could find now good Lada special 1500 I would buy it with no second thought, honestly. Or ВАЗ-2106 (VAZ-2106)
@GloopSerious-nt9dv3 жыл бұрын
Could you be so kind to show us some cars from Finland? xD
@tbyte0072 жыл бұрын
@@GloopSerious-nt9dv HAHAAH you had Lada ? Do you know that Lada's are Fiat 145 ? And if you are saying "it never betrayed me" you are fucking stupid lier. We had Lada's everywhere and they total UTTER TRASH. You drive it once a month and you have to fix it twice.
@Radictor4411 ай бұрын
Although the Type 45 could handle this itself, you bet NATO jets were ready to swarm ontop of Duncan for support if anything went down.
@pecheur19517 ай бұрын
Don't hold your breath... I remember in 1995 the Dutch begging for air power to save them and many thousands of Muslims from the Serbs at Srebrenica. They didn't get any support and were overrun and more than 8000 Muslims deported and most of them killed...
The mad thing about it is the ship would of downed the lot aswell aa destroy any incoming missiles at the same time! Very very powerful warship is the type 45!
@tomw69473 жыл бұрын
Yep, even the USA navy said they type 45 destroyer is as good as it gets and can pack a hell of a punch.
@andytyrrell51533 жыл бұрын
Not sure about that. More likely half a dozen planes downed and a ship sunk.
@tomw69473 жыл бұрын
@@andytyrrell5153 Depends, there is a reason why they said if the fighter jets get within 2miles they would shoot them down, at long/medium range those russian jets don't stand a chance. But the closer they get the more danger the ship is in. Plus's also depends on the type of Russian jets, most of Russia's jets are old apart from some of the new 5th generation which they mostly use to show off and trying to convince everyone we should be scared.
@bioltvint1boltvint1253 жыл бұрын
Crimea this is the ship. That you shot down there. Anglo Saxon fled.
@monstanoisebomb59963 жыл бұрын
Not a chance it can defend missile attacks upto Mach 3 but Russian hypersonics such as Kinzhal are Mach 9
@paultindall51492 ай бұрын
I don't know if anyone noticed, but one of the guys in the back was playing Galaga.
@SmashPhysical Жыл бұрын
SMH at Russia. They are always the bully until they actually try and pick a fight against someone smaller, then they get their asses kicked.
@williamthomas8254 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how ready the ship was to actually engage the aircraft and how quickly it could do so. It was always just going to be posturing from the Russians of course.
@Rasterizing11 ай бұрын
They didn't seem too bothered and didn't appear to be at "Action Stations"
@user-yk1hc7dl8e17 күн бұрын
20 targets can be engaged in a gap of 30 to 90 secs @@Rasterizing
@Dyils3 жыл бұрын
I don't know if the crew of Duncan are acting so arrogant because they are on TV and don't wanna lose face or they actually believe themselves. "They had 17 aircraft, we've got 48 missiles, I think we're gonna win"... That's like saying, "I'm facing 17 enemies but I have a gun with a magazine of 48 bullets so I think I'm gonna win." If a single ship could defeat 17 airplanes that easily (4th or 5th gen is irrelevant) than you'd be proving aircraft carriers are a waste of money. Yet the US keeps building them, and you built a new one just a few years ago. This sort of arrogance and underestimating your enemy is how people lose winnable battles.
@damedusa51073 жыл бұрын
I suggest you do your research, that ship could track and launch missiles simultaneously and destroy all the planes around it. It’s possible the best air defence ship in the world.
@johndave1172 жыл бұрын
@@damedusa5107 holy copium britbongers are on another planet of stupidity. when will anglos learn their place🤦♂
@jamescornick8739 Жыл бұрын
@@damedusa5107 it wouldn’t have the chance to fire if a hypersonic missile was launched. Ships are sitting ducks in modern times
@MrAckers753 жыл бұрын
Type 45 could more than hold its own against his these jets
@patthonsirilim57393 жыл бұрын
no it wont if all those plane fire there anti ship missile at the same time there saturation attack would easily overwhelm the type 45 air defense system the type 45 only have 48 missiles those would have to intercept the missile fired and the aircraft that is firing them im not saying that an air raid that size would leave unharm duncan would probably shot a lot of there missile and even some planes down but its really a matter of not enough missle to go around and we dont live in a world where a single missile is guaranteed a hit
@sweetpotato35903 жыл бұрын
@@patthonsirilim5739 The Type 45 class has the best air defence in the world. 48 missiles aren't for intercept. Those are 2 different things. There are intercept missiles and SAM missiles. And they have many CIWS. Also they have the strongest radar, it has the potential to knock out a jet if it flies to close...
@briant56852 жыл бұрын
@@sweetpotato3590 it's the best in the world in UK okay mate
@yournutritioussaladyt80292 жыл бұрын
@@briant5685 Nah the Type 45 destroyer is actually the best air defence destroyers in the world
@mrfrisky29972 жыл бұрын
The Russian pilots will have been shitting themselves when they realised it was a type 45 destroyer - they would need over 50 at once to worry that one ship. Great training for the ships crew though.
@barryporteous49047 ай бұрын
You heard the Commodore saying "very useful." Valuable experience gained. I'm sure the Russian gained a lot also. After the losses 1982 important lessons were also learned concerning the design and operation of these vessels.
@PowerOfFem4 жыл бұрын
Interesting that they were not at full battle stations with battle station gear on? Clearly they were not that worried about the threat of the Russian Airforce.
@bensmith75364 жыл бұрын
do they look battle ready to you? far cry from what went down in the 70s and 80s, this is another in countless tests of each others response. how about the bears coming in from the north, not newsworthy i suppose. got to have dramatic music and overblown media response though.
@scienceopposesevolution84283 жыл бұрын
Utter rubbish..if that was true that would have continued to close in on Crimea, which we all Know they didnt do, and took off
@TheBritishEmpire9203 жыл бұрын
@@bensmith7536 I’m pretty sure he means the fact they are not in anti flash gear..... which in that situation would be needed, do one grandad
@jamesdewer2 жыл бұрын
@@bensmith7536 exactly, they wouldn't have stood a chance. Even an Aegis cruiser taking a single anti-ship missile is in deep crap. The Russians probably had a sub ready to put that tub on the bottom. They're worried about a diversionary fly over. Hilarious
@BeckiSmith-bc9em Жыл бұрын
@@jamesdewer ok Botty McBottface
@johnnywindsor183 Жыл бұрын
My old captain on HMS Norfolk there
@kevinraines43186 ай бұрын
17 planes but we have 48 missiles good luck but how many have the planes got ?
@scheisskommandant37002 жыл бұрын
for those chanting in awe of russia. the aircraft equipment types (dropkick, slotback, top plate) are all cold war. tl;dr they're 30+ year old garbage that russia dusted off for a 'display'. not only would they have lost. but the loss would have been both embarrassing and expensive.
@proleterriert80753 жыл бұрын
But they have powerful radar right on the coast of Russian territory. The Russians probably picked up that there was a powerful radar on that ship and scrambled a large amount of planes to scare of the destroyer. All countries do this. It’s not naive they are just protecting there borders. Like Russia would get global condemnation if they parked a destroyer with powerful radar right off the coast of Edinburgh. Also I must say it is very British of us to applaud ourselves for doing nothing. Just told the Russians to stay back for their own safety, which they complied to do. Also, yeah that destroyer has a shit ton of missiles. But they have a shut ton of missiles on their wings plus they have flares and other countermeasures. The destroyer would sink. Maybe blow some planes up. But it would be a loss for us unfortunately.
@user-cx3bl7gh3g3 жыл бұрын
As a Russian - nobody wants to die at some war. Your guys had a practice with a radar, Russian pilots had a practice how to attack a foreign ship in the Black Sea. Both can express bravada... I miss the days when we have been meeting the British sailors in St.Petersburg during the Russian NAVY day. Seen a couple of half dead drunk Britts naked on Nevsky prospect... Guys had fun. So it would be way more fun if the Russian pilots and British NAVY would play a football game and late get drunk together.
@user-ei4te9te6q3 жыл бұрын
@@user-cx3bl7gh3g Британия всегда была врагом для России, даже тогда когда сражались с гитлером ! Они после втрой мировой войны хотели напасть на Россию !
@user-cx3bl7gh3g3 жыл бұрын
@@user-ei4te9te6q в международной политике важно строить мосты, а не заборы. И всегда помните аксиому - у наций нет постоянных врагов или постоянных друзей. У наций есть интересы. Для государства Россия что выгоднее - забор или мост?
@user-ty9lt4ck6c3 жыл бұрын
То что это территория России, думают только в России. Согласно международного права это территория Украины, а Россия - оккупант.
@user-cx3bl7gh3g3 жыл бұрын
@@user-ty9lt4ck6c Марина, России наплевать - кто и что думает. Точно так же как и США наплевать кто там признал или не признал аннексию Техаса, Нью Мексико и Калифорнии. Весь нормальный мир понимает де-юре может быть и не РФ, но де-факто это РФ и Россия не отдаст Крым ни при каких условиях. И никто не собирается воевать с Россией за Крым, включая олигархов и их детей в Киеве и Лондоне.
@user-lw9by5gx6j3 жыл бұрын
we must send a couple of Russian frigates to the coast of England to ensure freedom of navigation on its shores. Why should democracy be only on the shores of Russia ? Let there be a democratic movement of different warships and off the coast of England . You can even make a salute over London in honor of the opening of navigation
@bradywhelan38663 жыл бұрын
Illiterate
@user-lw9by5gx6j3 жыл бұрын
@@bradywhelan3866 machine translation ..The flight range of the hypersonic anti-ship missile "Zircon" in new tests will more than double: it will have to hit the target at a distance of about a thousand kilometers. This is reported by TASS with reference to a source in the military-industrial complex. previous tests of the hypersonic missile took place in early October: the Zircon successfully hit a target at a distance of 450 kilometers. The flight speed reached Mach 8, the altitude-28 kilometers. At the same time, the launch was first shown on video, however, the video turned out to be short - the newest rocket instantly disappeared from view.
@bradywhelan38663 жыл бұрын
@@user-lw9by5gx6j congratulations you think you can take out an anti-air warship from the britts. We all know its the Americans that make you sweat.
@leogrin93243 жыл бұрын
@@bradywhelan3866 You misunderstood the previous comment. Russia has hypersonic missiles "Zircon" and that is why the Americans are sweating, and you are among them.
@bradywhelan38663 жыл бұрын
@@leogrin9324 first of all, I'm highly aware of these missiles and second, I'm not at all because I'm not an American. Dipshit 🤣🤡
@TheDimistron4 жыл бұрын
Brits ship close to russian Border Russian: send 17 jets for a warning Captain:" I think it was a challenge for russia"
@Fa1h9993 жыл бұрын
@SNP Alba forever fuck my eyes! British people saying me what is this land! We are all remember what british empire did around the globe.
@mike_hunt47833 жыл бұрын
@@Fa1h999 yes, stopped the nazis from taking over the world?
@Fa1h9993 жыл бұрын
@@mike_hunt4783 HAHAHA! British stopped the nazis?! HOW? Threatened the Nazis with a finger from the island? Escaped from Dunkirk and didn't stick out? When it became clear that the Russians would win the war, they swam across the La Manche in haste to be among the victors? Is that how you defeated the Nazis? What an arrogant islanders, the United States's puppets.
@mike_hunt47833 жыл бұрын
@@Fa1h999 uneducated, Dunkirk was the Frenchs fault, the soviets would have lost the war if the UK surrendered, as Germany would have had twice the airpower twice the manpower, and the biggest navy by miles the Soviets and the Americans would have no chance of survival! so get back to your history class.
@user-os9ej3bz8k3 жыл бұрын
вызов был 1941-45год,когда мы ПОБЕДИЛИ всю европу!!!!!!
@greenwellnjobvu2432 жыл бұрын
Don't mess with Duncan .you got know idea how powerful this ship is.
@MiG28803 жыл бұрын
Anyone would be naive to think they can enter the black sea without being in the crosshairs of several submarines, land / sea based anti ship missiles... And the rest. The fighters are only the defences you can see. Guaranteed they are being targeted by a lot more than that. It's the sheerest stupidity and arrogance to sail into the Black Sea and think you can win. Those sailors wouldn't stand a chance. So close to being cannon fodder. And yes, i'm British.
@leogrin93243 жыл бұрын
It's not even about submarines and the black sea Russian squadron. The fact is that the Crimea has a very powerful coastal defense, where the entire coast is studded with anti-ship missiles. and whoever enters the water area is immediately under the gun, the chances of survival are very small.
@user-ei4te9te6q3 жыл бұрын
@@leogrin9324 я бы сказал 0 шансы ))
@user-ty9lt4ck6c3 жыл бұрын
There's no need to enter Black Sea, to defeat Russia. Moreover, there's no need to open fire, to defeat Russia :) Russia is a parody for USSR, which was a much more powerful state. What happened to USSR? It just collapsed under it very own internal problems. So will Russia.
@MiG28803 жыл бұрын
@Matty UK Yeah and i'll be okay stepping in front of a bus... My head is state of the art technology.
@alanmurphy304 жыл бұрын
" They have 17 planes, we have 48 missles" BUT! if they each fire two missiles then we wouldn't have enough missiles. Russian jets reguarly fire missiles in pairs when i see videos of them over Syria. Added to that, there was possibly a Kilo-class submarine in those waters too.
@birchwot69793 жыл бұрын
@Din Djarin Fucked by more sanction? xD
@scienceopposesevolution84283 жыл бұрын
@Din Djarin by who you fucktard? A sunken RN ship?
@user-tb6tp7vs3y3 жыл бұрын
@Din Djarin Не, факаться ин зе асс это сугубо ваше - европейское. Мы пока еще убогие ретрограды и варвары в этом плане и предпочитаем женские вагины. Кстати, если верить Бивору, то мы по достоинству оценили 2 млн дойче ваджайнас, заметь это все в эпоху без голубых таблеток. Представляешь какая сейчас будет эрекция у русского солдата в эпоху Виагры и свободы мировых взаимоотношений по линии Россия - НАТО (которое не расширяется на восток ни на дюйм)
@scienceopposesevolution84283 жыл бұрын
@Din Djarin certainly WAS..
@xkeyscore11202 жыл бұрын
Thales would have taken care of any stray missiles.
@koja693 жыл бұрын
You enter another country's territory and then wonder why are planes around you. Insane.
@ali_kazmi3 жыл бұрын
Crimea doesn't legally belong to Russia
@parrot20663 жыл бұрын
@@ali_kazmi acording history and their law, YES it is!
@noodles1693 жыл бұрын
@@parrot2066 Russian law isn't world law, and it certainly isn't the international law of open waters
@parrot20663 жыл бұрын
@@noodles169 Say that when they will launch hypersonic nukes. Remember about law of international waters. Close to Russia, not close to UK. STAY HOME!
@koja693 жыл бұрын
@@ali_kazmi by which legislation?
@thegaffer7280 Жыл бұрын
Thank you all armed uk force personnel for your duties in protecting the uk and countries from tyrants
@JC-sf6sf3 жыл бұрын
What are the Brits doing next to Crimea in the first place?
@user-bt3sc8qk5o3 жыл бұрын
Same thing that the Americans do.Provoke the Russians so you can get a video like this.Ironic how when Russia does it,they’re the agressors
@yournutritioussaladyt80292 жыл бұрын
@@user-bt3sc8qk5o How was UK provoking Russia while conducting passage in an international strait smh
@metalpuppet5798 Жыл бұрын
@@user-bt3sc8qk5o no one has ever provoked the Russians. The Russians are committing genocide in a free and democratic country and they are threatening NATO for no reason. NATO is an entirely defensive alliance that will never attack anyone until its attacked itself. They are only getting ready in case all Russians have a death wish.
@gunshipzeroone3546 Жыл бұрын
I like how he said oh they got 17 fighter jets,but we got 48 missiles, but fighter jets do have chaff/flares and jammers, you idiot."
@jcsixties422 Жыл бұрын
oh how insightful of you. thanks for letting us know...we'll let the ops room crew know as i'm sure they have no idea
@gunshipzeroone3546 Жыл бұрын
@@jcsixties422 just saying what true countermeasure defence system are there for a reason.
@LondonSteveLee Жыл бұрын
Modern systems will not be fooled by chaff and flares - that's what AI and real time digital signal processing is all about.
@axbarraz7 ай бұрын
I'll go with the captain's redaction. You're just an arm chair quaterback! 😂😂
@FP1947 ай бұрын
The fact that you think a fighter has jamming capabilities proves you have no clue
@marioaleksandrov78594 жыл бұрын
what if Russian nuclear submariane with 20 intercontinental ballistic missales each carrying 10 nuclear warheads surface 30 miles from UK border?
@MrWhitmen19814 жыл бұрын
Mario Aleksandrov They are already there so what’s your point.
@reznovnata38894 жыл бұрын
Britain would offer them fish and chips.
@MeganoOdles4 жыл бұрын
They do that already! as does NATO warships.
@HG694054 жыл бұрын
Reznov Nata offer them fish and chips and if they declined bye bye they go to the bottom of the ocean
@edc15694 жыл бұрын
are they defecting or something, why would they do that?
@chahineyalla48383 жыл бұрын
Very interesting body language by the radar operator reacting to his superior at 3:40.
@feliscorax3 жыл бұрын
Aye, he looks a wee bit less cocksure about that. I mean, these are formidable ships and the world’s most powerful air defence destroyers, but send enough aircraft (“targets”) and that still leaves their anti-ship missiles - presumably launched prior to their own immolation-by-suicide mission - to counteract. My guess is that at least one, maybe more, gets through to cause perhaps fatal damage. HMS Duncan has 17 targets, plus however many missiles might theoretically be launched, to contend with; they’ve just got HMS Duncan to defeat. This is why it’s a foolish admiral who sends a ship unescorted into the littoral zone of a major power, and is also why in wartime a flotilla - possibly with carrier-based air cover in tow and at least one fast attack submarine on fleet protection duties - would likely be deployed instead. Layers upon layers of air defence because one ship operating alone is a sitting duck no matter how powerful she happens to be.
@robleary3353 Жыл бұрын
Jog on! We've got 48 missiles!...... 🤣 Seriously though, great job!.
@Lexor888 Жыл бұрын
So he's implying every single one of their missiles ought to be a one shot kill... I highly doubt that. Given this specific scenario I'd rather sit in an agile fighter jet maybe, just maybe having to defend 2-3 missiles than sitting in a huge ass boat moving slower than a sloth having to counter 17 attackers at the same time.
@BoostyJ23 Жыл бұрын
@@Lexor888 more than 80% would be unlike russian munitions ours are highly effective.
@Lexor888 Жыл бұрын
@@BoostyJ23 Just because I'm not buying into that captains british BS doesn't mean I'm not from the west too - I'm german btw so the weapons you are refering to are mine too :P Where did you get that BS 80% number from? Do you personally test ammunition for some NATO country? Again, I highly doubt that number - and even if so... The situation is a single ship on a foreign coastline. Do you really think the russians don't have the power to eliminate one single ship on their own turf? That's stupid - none of our NATO ships will survive alone against a foreign power on their own turf.
@tankourito5419 Жыл бұрын
@@Lexor888 Yeah I don't think a german that backs russia has any opinion of value considering the history of your country.
@watching99134 Жыл бұрын
@@tankourito5419 Nice deflection!
@InTeRiiTuS Жыл бұрын
Damn the entire Russian airforce showed up
@championsofliberty07 Жыл бұрын
lmfao
@Cunny838 Жыл бұрын
good one
@InTeRiiTuS Жыл бұрын
@@Cunny838 Thank you kindly sir
@OneRichMofo Жыл бұрын
@@InTeRiiTuS I chuckled, good one
@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын
You could tell by the smoke , but they left their high flying tank turrets behind
@jamescornick8739 Жыл бұрын
Ships are sitting ducks these days when you have hypersonic missiles
@joecater894 Жыл бұрын
hypersonic missiles arent accurate. Surface temp of missile exceeds 2000c... hence this disrupts nav signals..
@aria9153 Жыл бұрын
They think one ship can defend itself infront of more than 5 aircrafts😂
@rossfylesthadon14433 жыл бұрын
48 missiles 17 aircraft I think we would of won here 😂
@Mufuchi3 жыл бұрын
That's funny cause there's hundreds of missiles ready to fire at shore.
@drvineetjoshi78693 жыл бұрын
If one aircraft will have atleast five missiles then 17 aircraft will have atlist 85 missiles.
@knowledge35632 жыл бұрын
and yet it will just take one russian missiles and there be in cold water
@jamesdewer2 жыл бұрын
@@knowledge3563 exactly, lots of.bravado which is expected from the underfunded European Unions or UK military but in a shooting match it's not checkers it's chess. Leave the heavy lifting to the US
@knowledge35632 жыл бұрын
@@jamesdewer hehhheeh ok sure if you think so in russia we love chess let play
@onnayoung7699 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how many of those plains are still flying today lol.
@samuelweir5985 Жыл бұрын
A lot of them probably are nothing but a lot of wreckage in Ukraine now.
@dinobronzberg5321 Жыл бұрын
Lot’s of em
@ryanquinn628 Жыл бұрын
All keychains today!
@sunnyjaggi Жыл бұрын
Enough to wipe Europe out of map
@samuelweir5985 Жыл бұрын
@@sunnyjaggi Uh, huh. They haven''t been able to defeat the Ukrainian Air Force yet.
@hughoxford87353 жыл бұрын
48 Missiles. I hope there are more than that.
@ENRU-018 ай бұрын
Wonder what response a Russian warship 30 miles off the coast of England would get
@leonardhpls67 ай бұрын
Would be interesting to find out.
@SAS-striyan3 жыл бұрын
Мне показалось, на БИП немного самоуверенно-расслабленная обстановка. Нельзя так, ребятки, враги кругом))
@user-du8qj7xw6u3 жыл бұрын
дык реально по пиздюлятору давно не получали
@mayor78293 жыл бұрын
Враги у вас кругом а у них противник
@mircards3 жыл бұрын
Это постановочное видео снято позже реальных событий.
@mayor78293 жыл бұрын
Мастера постановок ето раша уж вам равних нетнет
@mircards3 жыл бұрын
@@mayor7829 А кто то спрашивал мнение у предателей? Мнение зомбированных технологами промывания мозга англосаксов, никого не интересуют, пусть они варятся в своей каше. Не мешайте общаться людям.
@monstronir3 жыл бұрын
So you are thousand miles away from your country, next to another country and they are the ones bothering you? Yea sounds right.
@monstronir3 жыл бұрын
@Matty UK ill start by stating your historical credibility. I'll be blunt, you are the furthest away from being saints. Not the Turks or the Germans level, but you aren't far. Are you sure it's not the other way around dear NATO member? All the western nations under one umbrella targeting Russia, what's that for? After the fall of the Soviet Union you f*cked them up. Your own historians, tacticians, geopolitical analyzers wanted to separate Russia into 3 states so it could be easier manipulated. We know the trend, you gave half Cyprus to the Turks. Thankfully history can give us the information we need to analyze situations like these.
@leopivano77833 жыл бұрын
Do us a favour and educate yourself 1. Russia always breaches British airspace 2. They were travelling in an international strait In conclusion shut the fuck up
@johndave1172 жыл бұрын
@Matty NATO simp
@kaczynski23337 ай бұрын
5 years later, RN withdraws 2 frigates from the Red Sea, because they can’t get crew. Good luck…
@Axispaw16 ай бұрын
The amount wrong with this sentence is mind boggling. The Royal Navy didn't withdraw frigates from the Red Sea you melt. If what you say is true then how did they get their with no crew?? Both frigates were due to retire, only the second one was retired early as the crew was an issue. This happens from time to time.
@vophatechnicus2 ай бұрын
Well, yeah you got 48 missiles for 17 planes but just consider every one of these 17 planes can carry at least 4 anti ship missiles. In a war scenario you have to fight off those massive number of missiles AND planes, so it would not be that easy. In my opinion, in a swarm attack, EVERY modern war ship can at least be heavily damaged.
@sovietred73713 жыл бұрын
"They don't know how capable this ship is" '40 incomming anti ship missles'-"SO YOU HAVE CHOSEN DEATH"
@happilystoned3 жыл бұрын
the Russian navy is piss poor out of every country in the world more submarine disasters and half of there bloody fleet is still on diesel and as for the air force it is stuck in the 80s hand me downs the fact is the range of radar and the range of HMS Duncan's weapons systems would mean they wouldn't even get close to HMS Duncan. Russia resorts to sneaky cowardly nerve agent attacks because there capabilities suck ass all the commies have are nukes to make them a threat and even then they didn't even figure that out for themselves they stole it. The Russian military is a joke kind of like Russia as a whole only have to look at the country's infrastructure still stuck in the cold war era looking jank with f'd up roads not really a country to be afraid of.
@QuacksThePoet3 жыл бұрын
You didn't hear him right, the ship is carrying 40 anti-jet missiles.
@sovietred73713 жыл бұрын
@@happilystoned ah yes, propaganda and bias, best way to get fucked on the battlefield once you encounter your enemy "Underestimate your enemy and you have allready lost the war" - Art of War
@SocietyUnplugged3 жыл бұрын
@@happilystoned It's like saying that someone with an M1 Garand can't kill you because your equipment is way more advanced.
@RomanHistoryFan476AD3 жыл бұрын
@Matty UK 4 submarines actually.
@navnig Жыл бұрын
In a real world combat scenario, none of those aircraft would have got even a look at Duncan. In the same way that she'd likely have never set proper eyes on them either.
@EnglishScripter8 ай бұрын
Thats not true, she detected them taking off.. there is no hiding from that radar.
@PlanetBlake7 ай бұрын
@@EnglishScripter: I believe you misunderstood what he wrote. I believe he is speaking of actually physically seeing each other with their eyes, not talking about seeing each other on radar.
@EnglishScripter7 ай бұрын
Oh I see. Thanks, for clearing it up. Re-reading it now, that looks like the case.@@PlanetBlake
@blackadder3570 Жыл бұрын
If the ship is 'just 30 miles off the coast of Crimea, what did the RN expect?
@davebooth56558 ай бұрын
We go where we want , coward
@anton__r Жыл бұрын
Thats a pretty cool floating wizard hat
@RunPJs3 жыл бұрын
"What they don't know is how capable this ship is" said the Captain of HMS Hood
@DanilaMaster19453 жыл бұрын
Поймут не только лишь все.
@thethanoskillingkind31803 жыл бұрын
HMS Hood was a WW1 battleship sunk by a WW2 battleship the Bismark. The Russian jets are Cold War era whilst the Royal Navy Destroyer is the most capable air defence warship in the world.
@briant56853 жыл бұрын
@@thethanoskillingkind3180 that thing would be overwhelmed by missiles fired from Crimea itself
@tomw69473 жыл бұрын
@@briant5685 Russia wouldn't even risk it, turkey alone would beat Russia in the black sea, never mind the rest of the NATO countries, plus's Romania has been working hard on a new middle system that can sink ships from very long range and scares the shit out of Russia. Backed and paid by the USA of course.
@tesstickle72673 жыл бұрын
@@thethanoskillingkind3180 hood was a ww1 battle cruiser. Not a battleship
@wayneronnie74023 жыл бұрын
Videos like this are hilarious to me - A Brit who's been to Russia a few times and love the place
@aaronthebest55193 жыл бұрын
And? One Brit loving Russia is supposed to stop all tensions?
@eddiel7635 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, it’s great living in an autocratic kleptocracy
@stephen4121 Жыл бұрын
@@eddiel7635 as opposed to a monarchy?
@Blazedreptile Жыл бұрын
@@stephen4121 constitutional monarchy
@tyke-sl8bs Жыл бұрын
Got to ask the question, why did the ship need to be there?
@ifax1245 Жыл бұрын
International waters...
@yorkshire_tea6875 Жыл бұрын
To test Russias response and to send a political message that the UK sees those waters as Ukrainian and not Russian
@InternetForHomies Жыл бұрын
@@yorkshire_tea6875 which is completely correct
@jimmccormick60917 ай бұрын
In 2018, we all though Russian equipment and pilots were good. After Ukraine, many of us lost that respect. While 17 jets are a lot to defend against, I'd bet Duncan would have taken about 10 to 12 before they got to her. Also, I'd bet the guys on Duncan were all thinking "Crimea? No thanks, we Brits have been there before.... Nothing worth having..."
@aj..22 Жыл бұрын
Just imagine if a Russian warship was this close to the American homeland. we are just asking for war. And then we still play the victim 🤣
@HaiLsKuNkY Жыл бұрын
The point is this is off Crimea and the uk views this as Ukraine. I believe this ship was visiting Odessa to show our support and deliberate crossed into Ukrainian crimea water
@noname-sz4br Жыл бұрын
@@HaiLsKuNkY do they care abt uk views?
@edwardburroughs1489 Жыл бұрын
@@noname-sz4br Yes. Otherwise no planes would've appeared in the sky.
@celticguy1975313 жыл бұрын
what people on here forget and the armchair Admirals forget to that the Type 45 destroyer Radar can track up to 1000 objects and they were operating in International waters as a Blue Water Navy following their commitment to NATO and there is equipment on that ship that is top secret and as it is open waters i am pretty sure that HMS Duncan could handle 17 aircraft not forgetting that there would be other ships operating in the same waters that would lend a hand
@scienceopposesevolution84283 жыл бұрын
You are a moron. No ship from any country close to a major power will last 5 minutes. Have a look at Crimea...its called a porcupine for a reason...
@isaacwatkins-rye4379 Жыл бұрын
type 45 is amazing but i can't wait for the type 83 to replace them.
@m.r.heppener86595 жыл бұрын
Remember the fate of HMS Broadsword (F88) , ,Coventry (D118) and HMS Sheffield (D80) The admiralty did not expect these ships to sink but sink they did
@AllThingsCubey4 жыл бұрын
Converted from nonnmilitary designs with poor damage control and shortened hulls, lacking the Sea Wolf air defence systems to save money. The Type 45 is a dedicated air defence destroyer with multiple ways to down those planes or stop their weapons, from Aster 30 and Aster 15 to the CIWS, or electronic measures. It would take a very large air attack to overwhelm her defences.
@himbisaquatics3 жыл бұрын
and take note, with out the british jet engine design you cant do the job for your jets alone.
@TheBritishEmpire9203 жыл бұрын
@@AllThingsCubey finally, someone who speaks sense 🤣
@sti8u3 жыл бұрын
@@TheBritishEmpire920 yeah makes scense all right. Some mighty fire power required to protect the stock piles of Earl gray stashed below deck. Wouldn't want those Russians coming and spoiling tea time with their vodka and babushkas. I would personally use a diamond item with sharpness 3 and a few stacks of tnt.
@TheBritishEmpire9203 жыл бұрын
@@sti8u only sharp 3??
@dreikjapan40613 жыл бұрын
"If they were there to attack" you will definetely not able to even catch saying it ! hahahahahaha
@cglees Жыл бұрын
I saw a simulation of this. All 17 jets were shot down
@adrianh332 Жыл бұрын
Some of these comments from the Orcs have definitely not aged well.
@MrGoodspeedy4 жыл бұрын
" ...we had a response from one plane but it was garbled..." what was wrong with my english school with a scottish bias ?
@RockStarPCGAME3 жыл бұрын
Warning is the russian troll!
@justno4344 Жыл бұрын
Warning fortnight kid.
@Mattmans1113 жыл бұрын
The Sampson radar picked the jets up and locked on before they even took off, all 17 jets would be destroyed by the sea viper missiles before they got in range to sink the Duncan!
@armoredcupcake53833 жыл бұрын
you do know they can launch dozens of anti ship missiles at once with range up to 500km ,those aircraft are for show of force
@nworesistance98343 жыл бұрын
"Locked on before they took off" you're not the smartest are you.
@mirandela7772 жыл бұрын
@@nworesistance9834 - he only uses one braincell when tipping, no wonder....
@FalcoGer Жыл бұрын
That's a pretty dumb things for the russians to do. The ship was no threat to Crimea at the time and there was nothing to gain from this pointless posturing. On the other hand it offered intel for nato forces on scramble times, aircraft types and numbers, what ordnance would be carried, EW data, radar profile data and who knows what else. With rapid fire VLS you shoot down 17 planes in a minute. On the other hand, even with a probability of intercept of 99%, which is doubtful, you can't afford to get hit even once. So standard doctrine is to allocate two missiles per incoming threat, or at least it was not too long ago. 48 missiles really do go very quickly.
@user-ph2sv9dt1b3 жыл бұрын
Are you seriously, dude's ? 2-3 old soviets shit-rocket Will be enout. Or 1-2 modern russian land-start rockets (Jet pilot just funy, never attack ship more then corvete ) 17 Jet 😀 you are goin crazy
@bradywhelan38663 жыл бұрын
Illiterate
@user-dk6yr4cc4q3 жыл бұрын
@@bradywhelan3866 А ты грамотный?
@bradywhelan38663 жыл бұрын
@@user-dk6yr4cc4q good one danny
@johndave1172 жыл бұрын
@Matty britbonger copium levels critical⚠👆👆👆
@user-im6iy7of9x3 жыл бұрын
нех тута плавать (именно плавать, спецы в курсе что плавает дурнопахнущая субстанция , а моряки ходят ), brits go home
@user-nx9xv9vg4g3 жыл бұрын
А спецы в курсе что нет капитанов дальнего хождения, но есть капитаны дальнего плавания?
@user-im6iy7of9x3 жыл бұрын
@@user-nx9xv9vg4g у кого туалет, а не гальюн, пол, а не палуба - те плавают и не различают что есть судно (подсказываю - сугубо гражданское плавсредство), а что есть корабль...
@benjaminjames5157 Жыл бұрын
Overconfident commander is never good. “We’ve got 48 missiles” - dumb ass hasn’t considered air evasive manoeuvres would reduce Russian losses significantly. “They don’t realise how capable this ship is” - sure on paper, but if even 3 of those planes engaged in a joint simultaneous strike on the ship it’s finished.
@joywork4585 Жыл бұрын
If they fire on that ship they'll have a hell of a war on their hands 🤣
@DJEDzTV4 жыл бұрын
its funny how they get up close to crimea then issue warnings lol You have no idea how well protected Crimea is.
@HG694054 жыл бұрын
Duncan would of destroyed the planes very easily
@DJEDzTV4 жыл бұрын
Harrison G Duncan donut
@HG694054 жыл бұрын
DJEDz TV what do you mean donut it would of 😂
@sciencevevolution23624 жыл бұрын
@@HG69405 what about subs, land based missiles etc....enjoy the short time in the Duncan coffin you idiot
@user-ty9lt4ck6c3 жыл бұрын
It's not about a military protection. Russia is weak state, the bad copy of the USSR. The old jackal, with lost teeth, but the same jackal behaviour. Nobody will perform a military attack on Crimea, there's no need at all. Russia will fall from inside as USSR did. Sometimes I think Crimea was a bait for Russia to speed up it's fall.
@chizz323 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one that is surprised they didn't go to action stations? I understand they wouldnt want to do anything provocative like aim guns or missiles at the jets but you would think they would be prepared just incase
@xAimeeJBx2 жыл бұрын
They did if you watch the full programme
@uzihitman86243 жыл бұрын
Salam from the Crimean Tatar people Freedom to Crimea, together we are strong!
@sergeylazarev45693 жыл бұрын
Да ни фига ты не Стронг раз в Крыму остался
@rickrobbo9 ай бұрын
Why would they not have at least one person able to speak Russian on the bridge? I'd have thought that would help to issue any warnings clearly. Or even a pre-recorded warning in different languages that they can play on demand? Holiday charter jets have been using them for passenger announcements for years.
@internetenjoyer10443 жыл бұрын
triggered russians in the comments
@---cf9bj3 жыл бұрын
Can you blame them, britain sending warships to their backyard. you just read the british press when the russians send a couple ships through the english channel they throw a hissyfit and the dumb mps go crying to the pm in parliament. fundamentally threatening any country with a show of might is an aggressive move. and it doesn't create stability.
@internetenjoyer10443 жыл бұрын
@@---cf9bj when the russians send their fleet to the channel, its noted in the papers and the navy sends a frigate. In this case, one ship is in international waters and they send planes to harass it, and its in an area Russia took by force illegally. There's no comparison.
@---cf9bj3 жыл бұрын
@@internetenjoyer1044 First of all, russian ships also pass through international waters when going through the english channel. it doesn't stop the media hysteria and war hawk mps from having a tantrum over it. secondly we send the same warning messages to them as they do to us. we scramble jets and send warships to ward them off. Finally, you need to do your research pal because the people of crimea are first of all native russians and secondly they voted in an overwhelming majority to RE-Join the russian federation, there was nothing forceful about it. in fact it was the definition of democracy, the people of crimea chose to be russian.
@internetenjoyer10443 жыл бұрын
@@---cf9bj Yes, Russia is allowed to pass through the channel. The point is that, aside from tabloids making a fuss (and they should, it's deliberate provocation, unlike one ship) and a small number of ships and planes set to watch them, nothing happens. Contrast that with sending 17 planes to fly dangerously close to one ship in an intimidation attempt. Unlike Russia, Britain respects the right of travel in international waters. Regarding the referendum in Ukraine, it was clearly illegal and has no founding, but I don't want to focus on that. All I'm saying is that there's no parallel between the British response to Russia sending it's fleet to the English channel and the Russian response
@metalpuppet5798 Жыл бұрын
@@---cf9bj Russia has actively entered the territory of MANY NATO states. Also they happen to currently commit genocide in the free and democratic country of Ukraine. They really shouldnt be surprised that NATO is getting ready in case Russia has a death wish ;)
@birchwot69793 жыл бұрын
"I think it was a challenge for russia". Clowns... xD
@birchwot69793 жыл бұрын
@Brit Mk 2 Check out the range of this ship's air defense and Russian anti-ship missiles.
@birchwot69793 жыл бұрын
@Brit Mk 2 SAM PAAMS - max range 80 km. Old version of Russian air anti-ship missile X-35 -130 km, X-35U 260 km.
@birchwot69793 жыл бұрын
@Brit Mk 2 These aircraft could destroy the ship without entering the air defense zone. Are you not very smart?
@birchwot69793 жыл бұрын
@Brit Mk 2 The main point that I want to convey. A British ship in the Black Sea brings a smile. Not more.
@omm-production3 жыл бұрын
@Brit Mk 2 This vessel enough only 1 missile for the end, if you dont know it. Any of this jets can do it.
@elestromusicgamesfun1101 Жыл бұрын
Wow, there's alot of folks in the comments that doesn't know how anti-ship missiles work, or how effective they are.