1974 -75 Chrysler Imperial - Epitome of Luxury

Рет қаралды 5,527

Жыл бұрын

New videos every Tuesday and Thursday. Please subscribe. Each car has a story to tell. Sometimes it's more about people than cars. One of the most luxuries cars from the 1970's. 1975 Chrysler Imperial.

Пікірлер: 33

@TonyMoses-ne6ff 2 ай бұрын

Like these cars

@peterdelestrez8880 Ай бұрын

Really beautiful car.

@user-oq5bv8ue4c 8 ай бұрын

Two things I've always dreamed of owning was a 1974 or 75 Imperial LeBaron and the Hobart KitchenAid Superba dishwasher. Both top of their class.

@charlesb7019 Жыл бұрын

Gorgeous car - I have always wanted one.

@alanstrong55 Жыл бұрын

Very fine specimen of a luxury car.

@CarsDesign Жыл бұрын

Just posted this one, its about Packard this time kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ldCldKeHybyteok.html

@calvincrews3885 6 ай бұрын

I’m enjoying the Chrysler C bodies including the Imperial Lebanon which is still part of the Chrysler corporation

@johanbrand8601 Жыл бұрын

Fantastic!!

@CarsDesign Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching. If there is no snow I would love to have this as my everyday car. :)

@CarsDesign Жыл бұрын

Just posted a new video : "Packard History nobody talks about " kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ldCldKeHybyteok.html

@thomasmadden2258 Жыл бұрын

Excellent f amily car !! T h ey not cheap car

@thomasmadden2258 Жыл бұрын

The ride & full loaded f ulled frame

@thomasmadden2258 Жыл бұрын

Air suspension

@babbalonian2 Жыл бұрын

They were not easy to store. I often wonder if Nanna's ole Betsy is still out there. Was identical as the one above. Ashtray lighters on both sides in the back, lol. With a little switch to turn on the light above. Oh,,,,you're in Ontario... interesting.

@CarsDesign Жыл бұрын

Just posted this one kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ldCldKeHybyteok.html

@JackF99 Жыл бұрын

There's actually no such thing as "Corinthian leather". That was just a Chrysler marketing term for the same old leather everyone else uses : )

@Hall102 Жыл бұрын

And it worked beautifully. Here we are talking about it decades later

@user-oq5bv8ue4c 8 ай бұрын

Actually it wasn't. Chrysler did a lot of sampling till they found a certain type of leather. True it was a marketing move, but it wasn't the same. Çheck out the the interview with Ricardo Montalbon.

@dette-envers-les-animaux Жыл бұрын

i prefered the model before. The face of this one looks like too much to a new yorker of the same year. The america that i loved.

@CarsDesign Жыл бұрын

Just posted a new video : "Packard History nobody talks about " kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ldCldKeHybyteok.html

@joeseeking3572 Жыл бұрын

The face of the 74 and 75 Imperial looked nothing like the New Yorker - the New Yorker adopted the Imperial face (and tail) for 76 when the Imp was discontinued.

@ImForwardlook Жыл бұрын

It is an Imperial LeBaron, not a Chrysler!

@user-oq5bv8ue4c 8 ай бұрын

Ford Lincoln, GM Cadillac, Chrysler Imperial..........NOT!!!!!!! LOL

@user-oq5bv8ue4c 8 ай бұрын

That pi@#$% me off as well when people refer to it as a Chrysler.

@edwardp3502 Ай бұрын

Chrysler itself caused all the confusion. It was a CHRYSLER Imperial for 20+ years before it was spun off as a separate make. And by the early ‘70s, Chrysler was referring to it as a Chrysler Imperial in some print ads and threw an “Imperial by Chrysler” nameplate on rear panels to bring Imperial’s embarrassingly low sales figures into the Chrysler fold again. And it’s almost 50 years since Chrysler put the brand out to pasture, so let it be. Imperial or Chrysler Imperial, it’s the same car.

@ImForwardlook Ай бұрын

@@edwardp3502 By 1975 Imperial had been it's separate make for 20 years. Too bad you fail to acknowledge that but it doesn't change the fact.

@edwardp3502 Ай бұрын

@@ImForwardlook I literally mentioned it was a separate make in the second sentence. But Chrysler was lousy at making that new make anything more than what it was for the first 20 years, namely the high-end Chrysler. They sold Imperials at the same dealerships as regular Chryslers, on the same floor as Newports and New Yorkers. They gave Imperial a somewhat distinct body from 1957-66, then reverted to sharing a lot of panels with the New Yorker, and mechanically there was nothing on an Imperial that you couldn’t get on a New Yorker. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a big Imperial fan. But this insistence that nobody can call it a Chrysler Imperial is just silly.