+nrgtim Thanks for the support!

+Captain Rambunctious It is worthy.

Congratulations....enjoy!

+Ron Thank you sir!

+The Crumble Thanks Bro! I hope you get a chance to ride the T-120 and the new Thruxton.

+NinjaBum50 Dude, thank you for the support and the heads up....I'm gonna fry those fuckers:)

+NinjaBum50 You bet I am. Let me know if I can help you with anything....except moving;)

+Frank Torre Thanks Dude!

+terry franks Prepare to be very happy!

+Davie. H Thanks for the support; I'm ready for the Thruxton!

+Davyboy Colon Thanks!

+ALLDAYANTHONY I love my Speed Triple too!

+Cal Moto Next time I'm down in Livermore I'll have to stop by and say whats up. No better bike for me than the speed triple :)

+ALLDAYANTHONY I look forward to it!

+Jim Sweeney I look forward to meeting you!

+Cal Moto me too !

+Brendan Harney haha I thought he said "buy it asshat"

+evan002 Thanks dude.

+ronh821 Thanks bro! I think it's now a matter of preference. They are both awesome!

+David Alfaro It's a little subdued, but still very enjoyable.

Interesting.. I figured the t120 would have a deeper more characteristic rumble..not because of the bigger engine, both bikes have that genuine british twin sound but the t120 looks to be more refine I think. CancelPost

+Tommaso Tini The Triumph accessories are too new for these bikes and I don't know enough them yet. My rule of thumb is if they are legal, you probably don't want them. I like a closed course system.

Tommaso Tini Norman Hyde pipes, check out my page for a video.

The T-120 is a well considered motorcycle. Thoroughly thought threw, and performs tip top. You get what you pay, and it will absolutely out perform your other bikes. Try find a demo somewhere, and take it out for a while.

@@calmoto9073 I will probably end up with one of these but can't see it outperforming the MT09. 0-100 in 2.7 seconds! Thank you for your reply.

+Ojisan642 I never got near dragging a peg; I'd have to spend a bit more time on both.

+Cal Moto it's one of the few things keeping me from deciding between the two. I've heard that you can change out the peg mounts on the T120 and use the ones from the Twin and it gives you an extra inch of clearance, but I haven't confirmed that for sure.

+Ojisan642 That looks totally doable....nice call!

Cal Moto my local dealer confirmed today for me. Twin's pegs can be swapped out. Other thing I noticed, the T120 pegs are further forward, so there's less distance between the peg and the gear shift lever. Using the Twin's pegs would give more space front to back between peg and shifter, in addition to the ground clearance. $75 per peg, though. 😒

***** T120 looks beefier to me. The Twin sounds great, they both do. I'm told the Twin will get close to 60mpg and the T120 close to 55mpg. So not much difference.

I do; that said, I've never hurt anyone and don't consider myself too reckless. I hope it doesn't come back to me.

+Oh Alright! No contest....T-120.

Chest harness is the best IMO

+Marc Munich You'll have to sit on one and see how it fits. You might be a bit cramped. You can get a taller bench seat and lower the pegs and that might be enough to make it work for you. Good luck!

+LedFingers I have not. I believe the cruiser line up will become more limited in the future.

I have been told they are working on a cruiser based on the 1200 engine

+bertito43 I can't wait.

+cuzimaluzer777 Couldn't finish it the first time...

+Art Hernandez I shooting for tomorrow!

I didn't; I bought a Speed Triple!

Very nice as well.

I wanted a Thruxton R, but when I test rode some Triumphs the other day I got the chance to check out the Thruxton R and I just couldn't deal with the riding position. With other sport bikes I could squeeze the tank with my knees to keep the weight off my wrists, but the tank on the Thruxton so narrow I couldn't. My wrists took a horrible beating and it's a shame I really liked how the motorcycle got around twisty roads, but in slow moving traffic it was just awful. Of course if your core strength is better than mine and you can keep your weight off your wrists it might be an option for you. I am out of shape.

+Donavan does it do offroad?...nope.

+cuzimaluzer777 Says who!?

cuzimaluzer777 I meant an all around bike...aint no way in hell its going off road!!!

+cuzimaluzer777 They're all on the menu! Probably Thruxton first, then the Duke, & finally the Explorer.

+Cal Moto finally saw a ktm 500 exc 6 day today. 11.5 grand of greatness.

+Charlie Johnson Thanks for the support! Unfortunately, you've got two more Triumph vids coming. I'll try for a few Ducs and MVs.

Depending on where you live, it's legal to treat it like a stop sign if the sensor isn't working. It's not as though you're meant to sit there forever if the light is not going to change.

+Ojisan642 i get it. I'd still edit it out, though.

+Csirkefoga ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ he didn't break the law there. I'd have edited out the part at the end, where he went into the oncoming lane to pull into the parking lot ;)

I will if I get the opportunity!

Awesome! Love your videos man!

Thanks Bro!

I'm just spitballing here; so, as I understand you, any substantial material item that depreciates cannot be considered an asset? Even if it will always have monetary value? How would you list it on a balance sheet? What would be the reason for buying collision insurance? Why would you set up a depreciation schedule to generate a write off?

+JorgeGreek No; I'm tired of fucking with it.

sloppy jo reason?

+Tiago Ruivo I used the narrow setting for the off the bike portion because a subscriber suggested it would be better. Then, when my regular helmet camera had a dead battery, I switched with the other camera (Hero 4) and like a dumb ass I for got to switch back to wide mode. So it's not a weird zoom, it's poor operator;)

you live you learn...

Brunette vs Blond?

I wish I could afford both. I'm leaning towards t120 for commuting and weekend fun rides and getaways for a few hundred miles, but I'm 6'3 and 300lbs and don't want to look like an ape humping a tin can.

+Rusty Sparks This ain't no Super Duke! My Speed Triple has 142; that said, this is a fun bike to ride.

looks like it! definatly cool to look at :)

+NinjaBum50 Yes I do lol as I said was just suprised. though it would have around 100 thats all. Also My 1300 has 106 ft pounds of torque =p its hard to keep the front wheel on the ground :)

+NinjaBum50 Nice those all are sweet bikes along with the one in this video would love to have any of them in my garage one day :)

+NinjaBum50 All I can say is KTM has won my heart my superduke is like riding on a magic carpet! Even being a supernaked its one of the most comfortable bikes I have been on. I put 400 miles in one day and felt great!

+Rusty Sparks Have you ridden a Harley:)

+Cal Moto yes I get the point lmao

+dbauernf I never heard a rev limiter;)

+Jabsy You're confused. I didn't say "good" financial investment, I said asset, which it is. You should get a motorcycle and make an investment in yourself.

+Cal Moto You could see my confusion when you were talking about saving money and instead buying an asset. Monetary asset it is not, emotional asset it is. One that I've been indulging for 8 years now. My five bikes are more than enough for me.

+Jabsy Your confusion comes from hearing what you want to hear. I suggested restructuring a budget in order to reduce expenses and buy an asset. Although all my bikes are worth money, I'm sure you couldn't give your 5 pieces of shit away. That's why mine are assets, and yours aren't.

+Cal Moto I seriously doubt that. Your going to need a lot more than a Triumph Speed/Street Triple to qualify as a monetary asset. When you speak of assets without interjecting "emotional" before it, people assume your speaking of an asset that accumulates wealth over and above its upkeep and initial costs of purchase. So indulge me, what could you possibly own that's even remotely more collectible and financial gaining than perhaps say my Brough Superior? I'm curious to know.

+Jabsy There you go making shit up again. I don't have qualify "asset" with anything. You can't argue that it's not an asset because it is. Simply because you prefer to invest in motorcycles and try let the other viewers know how intelligent and wealthy you are, doesn't make you right....you aren't. Nobody is assuming anything about what I said because it's clear. Just as nobody has to assume anything about you because that too is perfectly clear. Congrates on your vintage bike, it clearly meets your needs...cheers.

+OtisENGINEuity Never had the opportunity.

+Cal Moto T120 used to actually mean Triumph 120mph in a time that most bikes claimed they could do 100 but could barely hold 85 and the Bonneville could stay at 120 all day long. Go to a local bike show and talk to guys that have the originals and see if someone will let you ride theirs. Built they made about the same power as the T100 does now around 54hp but the thing is they only weighed about 360lbs. The other thing is that no other bikes handled like brit bikes back then, on a twisty road not even CB and KZs could keep up despite having more than twice the power. And that's not saying they are slow in a straight line, granted modern bikes will outrun them easily but they are surprisingly quick and the transmissions are extremely long legged, if you use all the rpms you will get moving to the point that you will probably let off before you hit max speed. And there's nothing that sounds like a real Bonneville. And if you ever get the chance to hop on a T150 or T160, do it... once it gets into the power band you will be in for a ride... That's the original Trident 750 Triple. I'm lucky enough to have packed on both as a kid.. well not a Bonneville perse as the T120C is actually the TT Special or Scrambler in 1965 not a Bonneville.. My dad owns that and a 74 T150V. I'm telling you nothing sounds like that T120C that thing was built for flat track racing before we got it and it has probably 12.5:1 compression, big cams and most likely was taken up to 750cc... probably pumping out around 60-65hp.... when it's running, damn carbs are warped.

+rog5150 Sarcasm is the lowest form of humor;)

+Cal Moto sorry about that, after 25 years in the military it's all I can manage. Seriously though the bike is designed with high torque, heavey crank, lower compression and longer gearing. Do you ride all types of motor like that? I'd have run a higher gear and enjoyed the torque. I don't hang around either I just play to a bikes strengths. Each to his own and all that at the end of the day. ....but do you ride with so many rpm's all the time?

+rog5150 No worries, I'm sure I'd adjust to find the optimum performance range; but yes, I like to use the full range.

+Cal Moto Interesting. I read in the press sometimes that the author used one gear for a series of turns. sounds crazy to me. ..I like to change gear and try make super smooth by matching the rpm's. so now I'm just jealous that you have ridden the damn bike and I still have to wait 2 months for mine, that I ordered in November last year grrrrrrr.

Camera angle is perfect.

You're fucking hilarious!

Cal Moto No I am just hilarious! Safe rides!

Cheers.

+igrinder88 lmao.