question: is it running factory upmap? no extra tune? do you have the stock number for this bike? have you ran 1103 V4 + full exhaust on this dyno? what are the numbers?

I have a 2022 V4 S with the same Akrapovic racing exhaust, and after the tuned the bike was in the 199.6 horsepower. So, I don’t need an special oil for that tuned. So, with all the respect to the bike owner, I believed that something is very wrong with the bike. I don’t think that with the oil in the bike will add another 10 extra horsepower. It’s a beautiful bike, enjoy it

Did you also get the uptune from Ducati? Because without it you won't get much performance upgrade just with the exhaust.

@ilmostro16 How many miles were on this bike at testing?

Ducati says the transmission loss is 10.59%. @650ib tested his V4R at 3000 miles. It measured 212 hp at the rear wheel. At the crank you do 212/0.8941 = 237 bhp. Which is exactly correct. He uses Motul V 15w50 oil. So either that dyno needs calibration, or you need the Akrapovic map or air filter or something. That is an extra 6% loss you have, so you should inspect your engine in my humble opinion. Or maybe your engine is still too new.

My Honda scooter hit 237hp on that dyno. 💪

I thought it wasn’t recommended to remove the baffles?

That's running on akra map ?

Two stroke scooter? 🛵 🥵

You can talk yourself into a lot of things, but 30 hp loss from the wheel to the engine is too much. I'd say 15-18hp maximum loss, so you have around 215-218hp at the engine with the system, which is clearly too little. Are you sure you have the right mapping? The oil is supposed to give you 3hp, not 10. With Ducati, it's usually the mapping that doesn't give you the power. My experience on the track is that the R with exhaust has significantly more power than most other bikes, there is something wrong with your set-up or with the bike.

All dyno's achieve different numbers, although they are usually pretty close to eachother. I'm thinking that the rear tire was slipping on the roller, giving inaccurate readings. You can see the bike moving front-rear under power. That in and of itself can affect power readings. He should definitely had the bike strapped down more securely, if for no other reason than safety. My 1199 requires the rear suspension to be almost totally compressed for the tire to grab the roller properly. The V4R in this example is not compressing the suspension very much at all, which can really let the tire slip due to lack of weight on the tire. Second problem. . the baffles were removed without changing the fuel curve, which forces the engine to run lean. Both runs the exhaust note sound 'tinny', which indicates the mixture is running lean, so the engine was definitely not making it's potential power due to that. I call this a totally BOGUS run, by someone who wasn't making SURE that the bike was SAFE ...PROPERLY TUNED.. had good traction, and had sufficient wieght on the tire to asure against slipping. The rear tire isn't even compressed. Worthless video!!

How many miles are on the bike?

218hp on stock exhuast, 237hp on akra exhuast with the race amp enabled, and 240with special oil. This made 200whp which is a full 230 crank hp at 15% drivetrain loss and with NO RACEMAP

Sorry for my bad english btw.

Some comments are totally ridiculous. Ducati make fucking wick bikes hands down. The v4 is one of the quickest bikes around....

10hp Just because of the oil ?

maybe Ducati claim 240hp on the crank

Wow its so funny reading some comments, it dosen’t matter if ducati advertises numbers that dont add up irl, thats the beauty of freedom of choise, they are not forcing you to buy the bike, and even if it only does 198whp i highly doubt that 70% of every day riders would be able to use the bikes full potential on track or street for that matter.

Not impressed. Im disappointed considering it doesnt produce the hp that ducati claims. And just like someone stated that its different dyno machines, different operators, different atmospheric conditions, however, those 3 factors wont make up for the missing 40 hp that ducati claims it has

So, Duc markets this as a 240HP, at the crank, bike. the racing oil gives 3.5 hp as stated by ducati, so, you have there a 237hp machine that makes 200HP, barely. Meanwhile, on Akrapovic's site, you have a cbr, rated at 215HP at the crank, making 193hp at the wheel, out of the box. Your first run with the duc was 189 as i saw there and you had to remove the baffles to hit 200 after many attempts. BMW, markets the s1000rr as a 207HP machine, it makes 199 at the wheel, out of the box. The aforementioned cbr with the full akra and tune can go above 205 and so will the bmw i'd guess. the v4r will cost 51k€ or close to 55k USD. So, tell me, how would anyone justify that? The only thing Ducati does better is being light but that's easy to do with any other superbike on your own, it lacks in every other category. and before you say anything about drivetrain losses, everyone has losses. You can't have bikes with significantly lower power ratings do close to or bigger numbers at the wheel. And as tech progresses, efficiency increases, that 15% number was relevant 20 years ago, by that logic, the cbr should be making around 180HP at the wheel and bmw should be making 175 and even the first gen s1k made more than 180 at the wheel, that was 13 years ago. Efficiency has come a long way, so, either ducati is using 1990 level metals for it's gearbox and final drives or it's overstating its numbers. So, again, how is that price premium over its competition justified?

…every stock v4r on youtube goes over 200 hp… bad bike, bad dyno or bad tune…

Passano gli anni e ancora non sapete legare le moto sul banco. Così si rovina telaio canotto e sospensioni. Le moto sul banco si legano verso dietro per non fare avanzare la ruota sul rullo! Soprattutto con queste potenze! Fatevi una domanda, avete mai visto una motogp sul banco?🇮🇪

Clearly a very overpriced 200 rear wheel hp. Aprilia RSV4 makes 200 RW hp bone stock. The extra 100cc motor size is irrelevant to average buyers

statt 240 hp? Italienische Pferde:D

So it makes 11hp more than my 2023 GSXR , but cost 45k more lol

I'm wondering what Eylon Musk would actually think about all this fanfare of "technologies" requirements to produce this type of engine/motor to power this type of bike, when, if the brains had been put together to thinks about "battery technology" rather than fossil fuel... Less than ten years from now, these gas guzzlers will be dying dinosaurs on their way to extinction... Been riding Harleys for decades, and when I look at my old bagger, I just shake my head left and right...