TheAuraGuardian the shiny paradox is clear and I think it's right.

TheAuraGuardian hai

how the are shiny legendary pokemon and thire is one legendary pokemon of a kind

Halt TAG (no, not the game), if 1 patch is having a shiny then : first=1/8192 second=1/8191 because it is less with 1 patch. So on until one of them either is the last or has the shiny before the last.

What if the thief cant trade the Pokemon because it isnt his own Pokemon.

No other poke ball can be used to catch the domestic Pokémon now lol a stolen Pokémon would still have the original trainer tagged to it but through process of trading the Pokémon recognizes the trainer it was traded to as its new trainer

GameShark: I too wanna know the location

@@brucebrittain6183 In pokemon HGSS you can throw a pokeball at a trainers pokemon, and the trainer has to actively block it to prevent you from stealing their pokemon. I learned this cause I was trying to catch a Nidoran forgetting that it was a trainer battle cause I got distracted by a video I was watching at the same time. So it seems at least in that game that a pokeball can catch an already caught pokemon.

@@brucebrittain6183 I'd imagine the trade machines might require something like recognition you own that Pokemon for cases like this.

uncleltr ikr

Maybe it's damaged and has to be repaired

uncleltr cause he can

The original paradox involved a boat (sometimes an ancient boat in a museum) being replaced piece by piece, usually one plank of wood each year or something.

If it’s old or broken.

none because Lets Go wont let you

there is no way twp pokemon will touch it the exact same moment there will be at least a couple microseconds between so whoever touches first evolves i guess

Ping

the one that touched it first. the chances of two touching the same one at the same time are pimossible

Let's fight over it Commenter sent out Eevee! Replier sent out pikachu! Both used the same thunder stone! Eevee evolved into eeveeon! Pikachu evolved into raipika!

Now it makes sense

Oh Yeah

maybe he realesd it and caught it again in an ultra ball

Or just “man, you were good gallade, but your IVs were trash.”

limpinSeal oh my lord

My guess would be whoever catches it first, since its technically a different Pokémon than either of the originals ..... (Does this comment make me a genius? I hope so :P )

its technically an evolution, so the slowpoke owner would get it

+Ellie So, if you caught a bunch of slowpoke, you could make them bug a bunch of trainers' shellders until they bit all the slowpokes' tails, and then you could take other peoples' shellders and not technically be stealing? I just want to see an episode where Jessie and James figure out this loophole, then catch a bunch of slowpokes to abuse the hell out of it. Maybe steal all the magikarp salesman's shellders and rub it in his face. It'd be hilarious.

The slowpoke trainer!

And Pokémon who say their name from another language are from alternate universes.

And for the different language one, all of the Pokémon world speaks the same language.

*Me when it's 3 am and I can't brain anymore* Yeah the Naruto Pepe

If they follow the same rules as Taxonomy. Pokemon should have a scientific name. Latin names in animals were stated because of that same problem of different regional names for the same animal. But idk, lol.

You mean you don't want Pokemon named LEEDLEEDLEE WOOOOOOOP?

@@Spark-nl2nj oh sorry, anyway thanks man, I get it now

Pinnocio: ...Wait, now I can lie undetectable

Ok DIO

That’s a paradox

It fell off because he broke the system

So, basically different otomottapoeias? (Forgive me, but I forgot how to spell that word.)

onomatopoeia

In the games the Pokémon don’t say their names... the Pokémon anime is dumb

i live in brazil,here the cat sound is "miau"

But if a black cat goes to China? Will it be a Chinese Cat?

Ethan Redsky I swear to drunk I'm not God.

Eclipse We need a Lum, Persim or a full restore

same

The 2nd and 3rd weren't even about pokemon

What meowths name is as long as mewtwo or arceus

More than 1000 letters in his name

Ok, 1. Not all Meowths speak English... And 2. I know I'm gonna get r/whooshed hard when I do post this comment, and I know you're listening if you do.

Lmao

Gardevoir has 9 letters while English has only 7

My top 5 Miraidon Iron Bundle Iron Treads Great Tusk Koraidon

I see, I'm late. You're right, also I think most of the others don't necessarily classify as paradoxes either.

RonnyTime you said what i wanted to said but i cant

Isn't there the the starting contition, that on one patch there is a shiny, so the overall chance of finding a shiny in one of them is 1?!

It's similar to Schrodinger's Cat

Ehm, no it isn't. Schrödingers cat is at the same time dead and alive, because we can never say if the poison is released or not without opening the box. This is just simple statistics under 8191 patches there is no shiny Pokémon and under one patch there is a shiny. It isn't important what's the status of the Pokémon in the grass.

this wouldn't happen if the pokemon is out of the pokeball when it is broken

but then the pokemon wouldn't belong to that pokemon anyways because it has damaged

but at the same time it doesnt mean the pokemon would start disobeying it's trainer. after all, pikachu stuck around after a theory that it's pokeball broke

Why are t

DO WE HAVE ANOTHER PARADOX

Shining Shinx - Mongoose556 I’m a simple man. I spell clicked as cliked

Omg same!!!!

Same here

Same

HOLY SHINX

@Megalovania Fan Is it? (Seriously, I don't remember anything from this video)

@Megalovania Fan It actually is. The Pokemon is attached to your trainer number.

If it is how it works in the games, it’s true. In the description of the pokémon there is the original trainer name which will be always the trainer who catches it, and if someone steals the pokemon it doesn’t matter. The thief didn’t catch the pokemon, so it is not the OT. If the thief trades the pokémon with another person, it is still part of the trainer who catched it

@@aquaneutral True, the OT is registered forever and you can't change it

So when you get your starter Pokémon, the original trainer should be professor Oak (or any other professor in other regions than Kanto), but unexpectedly you are the OT of your starter... So the OT is the person who caught the Pokémon except it was given to you as a starter!?

Fangette 8192*

And you can't walk around them

"there is both a shiny and no shiny" Schroedinger's shinx

@@themilkman1938 And until you open the box (pokeball?) you will never know if it's a shiny or not. However, the possibilty of it NOT being a shiny will prevent you from opening it so you can avoid dissapointment. But for the love of god let the poor Shinx out of the box (pokeball?)!

Sounds like my math questions. All it needs is, "every third is black. Then every 5 rot. How many good patches lf grass are left?"

DeadlyViper37 I have no idea

Velia Hernandez maybe its the seals from gen 4

I think Alex created that himself based on the Ship of Theseus paradox.

the seals wouldn't completely change the ball, they're just covers and it shouldn't chip, the only way that a pokeball has seen to be damaged is when it gets stomped on (i think jessie did it with her dustox's ball)

well how do you think they made the jewel incrusted pokeball, besides I'm all for an improved seal system that can change the outside as well I mean in sun in moon You can actually see what ball they use when you through it Even the npcs have diferent balls of Course i don't think it was worth removing sitting but still pretty good

AND if you break the pokeball containing the pokemon , the popkemon is released , so , they steal a pokemon , give another pokemon to the other trainer , and then the pokemon they gave to the trainer by trading , they break the pokeball and the pokemon is released. But if they didn't break it , the pokemon would belong to the trainer.

Since only the trainer that is the legal owner of the original pokemon is allowed to trade it, the trade itself is invalid too. I assume the pokemon would disobey their new master anyway. So before you trade your pokemon for a stolen pokemon, you better make sure it's really theirs (let them proof that they have known the pokemon for some time). In worst case you lose both. But yeah, it's one of many aspects about the pokemon universe neither the games nor the anime are particularly clear about.

Pancake butter Actually, it's probable that there is a single piece that has the regestration of the pokemon for anti theft purpose. This piece will most likely have a factory reset security feature upon removal to prevent the paradox (and so some employee doesn't take the old regestration chips and steal people's pokemon with it.) And there is probable a single piece that contains the pokemon data in so the only issue is if it was wired incorrectly. Edit: spelling corrections

Id assume as soon as a piece breaks off, then Pidgey is auto released from pokeball needs to be recaptured. So whatever pokeball it was captured, so long as it isn't broken, it will stay in

Box-O-Cookies but it is still mostly the oeiginal pokeball... at that point, I guess then when more than 50% of the pokeball is replaced, it is no longer the original. . And I thought any pokeball worked on any pokemon as long as it doesn't have another pokemon.

Blue killed his own raticate! O_O

See, the problem here is that the pokeball either has a memory card that keeps the pokemon's data inside it, at which point when you replace that it would be a different pokeball (You could still have the same pokemon inside, it'd basically have to be traded), or the pokeball contains a pocket dimension (more likely given the name), in which case no part could be replaced without breaking said pocket dimension and releasing or sending out the pokemon. its a lot easier to come down on any given side with pokemon than the original paradox (a boat with its parts being replaced), because a pokeball actually stores something tangible that will most definitely let you know if it is no longer the original.

Both

*schrodinger's Cat intensifies*

the darker one

And if it goes into both, would they be split messes after they are let out? Of would the pidgey be cloned?

AetherResonant that's how cloning works canonically!

Finest Cat because the teacher is right

If they decide to settle it in a battle, all previous arranges should be nule.

The student is right cause it's not his first battle ( maybe )

If a teacher wants you into that paradox, hes already flipping you off from the start

Videos are taking longer than usual now, but yeah it's always nice to be able to upload haha :D

TheAuraGuardian 300000k is coming soon so congratulations (early)

Hi Supra I subscribed to you . Your sun and moon randomizer nuzlocke is class .

Abodi x no 300k 300000k is 300million

U sucks

????????

I thought the becuz red would be listed under ot(original trainer)

I would argue that you can't trade a pokemon that is not yours

No

@@Corrupted_Eon Does the original owner of a car still pay for it after selling it?

This is actually accepted in math as true.

Only if it repeats to infinity. 0.999... equals 1, but 0.999 does not equal 1.

≠ - is should've been this not =/=

Its pretty simple actually.It all comes down to probability theory..P(A)+P(B)=P(AUB)..So yes if u encounter 1 pokemon randomly,reload the game,encounter another one randomly,reload->u will never find it..But if u encounter one pokemon,move to the next grass tile encounter another,then u are uniting the probabilities as i wrote above...Meaning if u encounter a pokemon on all of the tiles the probability is P(T1)+P(T2)+P(T3).....+P(T8192)=P(T1UT2UT3....UT8192)=1

thebluebearb not all keyboard have that key

keero kamiya it's like with the ship

/\ Exactly. Look up The Ship of Theseus aka Theseus's Paradox.

***** what does that have to do with replacing parts of pokeballs ever being established as a thing you can do in pokemon?

keero kamiya I thought you were new to the idea of the paradox, not the actual concept. Yes, I believe that's not actually a thing in the games/show.

***** lol yeah I'm familiar with the concept of paradoxes I was just having trouble thinking of a way to actually do that with a pokeball. I guess if the pokemon were outside the ball at the time of replacing a part.

Yes

deathboy17 thank you! i clicked the like to the original paradox and it makes just as little sense

It’s not even a paradox, it’s just about the same as the Schrödinger’s Cat thought experiment. Each patch simultaneously contains a regular Pokémon and a shiny Pokémon until you check.

@@thegoatcarnival Valid.

@@thegoatcarnival Based

Yee

Josh Lyman Idk But Its Really Annoying

MysticGengar 12 also the legacy of discord stolen videos, that game is like 50 games in 1 according to the ads

Futaba Meguca To be fair, Nintendo didn't take down Uranium. Nintendo had their lawyers snooping around, seeing what could be done, and the creators of Uranium realized that they might get sued, and so, in respect to Nintendo, took down Uranium.

Josh Lyman I know it shucks

he's talking about the one the thief received you dimwit

It belongs to the original trainer as when you trade it still has the original trainers ID on it so not a paradox

it’s the monty hall problem

Yeah this video is full of shit

@Megalovania Fan That one wasn't even a paradox. The probability would change more in favor of you finding a shiny as you look through each bush without seeing a shiny.

u were 100,000 view. good job

it's 578k views, bro

TheKingRiki and I seen your comment and it had 199 likes

Anomolous Tesseract- *_Are you serious?_*

And you have 333 likes now

Jayden Lawrence it either dissolves itself or it somehow bounces back to the trainer without you noticing

Pretty sure it just goes back to the trainer...

Jayden Lawrence it bounces back to trainer, you can see that in one of the episodes of DP when dawn first caught pachirisu

Dermit*

Holy Shinx!!

xGuumi same

Same xD

xGuumi HOLY SHINX!!!!

So if I trade a japanese pokemon it would speak its japanese name? For example I get a japanese Bulbasaur and it says Fushigidane?

SuperSmashTails well yeah (in the anime since the games and anime are different)

Jessica Bradley i

Nup, Pokémon don't speak differently depending on the country. If pokémon names cames from what they cries, it's just that according to countries people ears different things. Just like in the real with the frog, the rooster and the list goes on

Jessica Bradley if u take an english cat and a cat from Japan it Would still make the same sound, so why should it be diffrent with pokemon?

I don't get think I really get it either but I think he means that each individual patch of grass has a 1/8192 chance of having a shiny pokemon, therefore it's technically very likely that none of the patches of grass contain a shiny pokemon? This really only works if you think of the patches of grass as being individual rather than part of a whole

Wrong the chances reset after each wild encounter. So you cant just expect that by the last clump it has to have the shiny. That's not how lottery statistics work.

Teddybear 4lyfe27 yes you are alone

Which one of the two Comments are correct?!?! My Brain is melting know

Oh, hey! It's Mr. Gumby!

same here

Sparky Joltz (Brain Explodes)

They aren't sentences without the proper period at the end. Yep, I'm *THAT* guy.

Sparky Joltz uuuuuuhhhhh

That means the bottom sentence is telling the truth and the top sentence is lying about it being true so one of them is lying hehe

Except those aren't sentences, or at least, not proper ones. Where did the periods go?

@John Paciorek ur fucking confusing me

@John Paciorek I understand actually. I was just making a joke

@John Paciorek what if it comes from a person who, for whatever reason, is incapable of lying?

And better, how? would the pokemon escape as pure energy?

Really Bad Productions that exactly is the paradox.... which one contains the Pidgey... better still... duplication glitch, anyone?

Maybe it gets damaged? That type of thing has happened before in the anime. With the pokemon in question just hanging out outside the pokeball until it gets fixed.

he just based the premise off of the ship of theseus paradox

Really Bad Productions if a ball is broken or damaged a pokemon can become trapped until the repair is done as for the true answer well i havent the slightest clue but i would guess the ball that has become completely redone

I just think this. Nobody loses money. They both Gain then lose (Or lose then gain) so it's not much of a paradox.

Maximiliano Penna I guess the kid wins cause he got trained by a master for free.

***** That's not much of a paradox as it does have an answer. The student was smarter than the teacher to get away with it for free.

Piplup1704 He probably still sucks at battling though.

Matthew Coyle Probably. Though he did have 6 pokemon... *Or the aura guardian just didn't plan this paradox out well*

@@mintayza7784 Maths are just maths. It's never weird, it's just maths. All here is probability. There's a chance for all the patches to contain a non-shiny , and there's a (Really small tho) chance for all the patches to contain a shiny pokemon. If you calculate (8191/8192)^8192 , you'll calculate the probability of all the patches to contain non-shiny pokemons. The chance of all the patches to contain shinies is (1/8192)^8192. So, all is possible since the probabilities of encountering a shiny isn't 0 and the probability of encountering a non-shiny pokemon isn't 0 either or 1. Even if the probability of meeting a non-shiny pokemon out of 8192 patches is pretty small (0.36785698645) and that the probability of meeting at least one shiny in 8192 patches is higher, all is possible and you could meet between 0 to 8192 shinies out of 8192 encounters. But anyway we get to the same point : The logic in the video is stupid. It's not a paradox , it's just that you can't calculate probabilities right , TheAuraGuardian.

@@minhoshin7269 can you for a second read the pinned comment? He admitted himself that he's wrong, bro.

Ani-P no he admitted that he explained it weird or incorrectly because of what its base was

also probability doesnt work like that at all

He's using the paradox of the Ship of Theseus, which is similar, but replace Pokeball with a ship. He mentioned earlier that these would be paradoxes based on real life given a Pokemon twist.

you can not replace any parts of a pokeball based on how they work

If you take off a part o a pokeball to replace, it the pokeball will probably break and the pidgey will be released

actually yea, i think once or twice a pokeball broke and the pokemon was released

cooldude56g Maybe the pokeball is the owner. Once a pokemon is caught it is stuck in that ball until released. So, stealing that pokeball wouldn't make a difference.

cooldude56g u freaking legend

darcraven01 no that's not how probability works if ones chance is 1/8197 then all of them will

Well, no 1 I can understand. Its like having a japanese cat being transferred to america and ask what noise they make. It's portrayed differently between shows to apply our naming to the sound they make. So lets say we name a cow betsie, but the japanese name her bettusu instead, we're still talking about the same thing, we just pronounce it differently. The shows just portray how certain regions hear the sound. You actually have to look at the games to fully understand this one as pikachu is one of the very few pokemon who's cry in text was ALWAYS pika-pika or chuuuu. But for some pokemon, you see stuff like fwufwufuw, rwaaaa and gruuu. Later on this started to be region specific text more and more, but the key thing is that the text would represent the sound they produce and the name would be on how they would name that sound. Even if you look at it as the same computer when you replace old parts, its technically still a newer part of YOUR pc. The question isnt if its still YOUR pc, just upgraded over time, but if all the old parts gathered(same software that just got outdated) and rebuild into the pc you bought is authentically yours. And actually, you do get to a part where the entire thing is new. Even though you kept upgrading it over and over again, from bottom to top, back to front, the ENTIRE thing consists of entirely different information and atoms than the first. If you'd regather the old parts and make the old boat, you'd have the original boat. But because its property mixed with concepts, where is the line where something original gets replaced and upgraded to be an entirely new whole object? That is the paradox. We dont tend to think about it, because we like to stick with concepts in society rather than objects. But just because we like it doesnt mean we're right. The third paradox hinges on pokemon battle laws and the agreement they made. The thing is, they are both right. One fital detail tho: this is assumed that the amount paid to the teacher is the amount won in battle, since there has been no number given to money being won and money needed to be paid The paradox here is that to the student, even though its a settlement, its still a lesson untill he wins his first battle. But the teacher sees them seperate. Both are right. Under law, if the student loses, he still has to pay, but under contract he doesnt need to pay. The contract is the paradox. This sometimes still happens in real life in very specific cases and can end up in massive court fights as even though its against the law, you still signed a contract and depending on the law it can take a long time of debating and arguing with both sides and the supreme court of the country to figure out which one will be more important. Its basically the question "if violence is wrong, but the only way to stop an attacker is by attacking him, is it still wrong?" It is a grey area and grey area's are where a lot of paradoxes originate. The shiny one never was about the eventual outcome. There was already 100% chance that there was a shiny in the entire patch of grass as said in the start. The question is that if 8192 people went into 8192 patches gives them each a near 100% chance of encountering a non-shiny. But there is garantueed to be a shiny, then how can be deducted where the shiny is roughly located to get your best pick? They never talked about the chances of 1 patch being a shiny one, we KNOW one is, for certain, 100% shiny patch. But each patch has practically 100% chance of having a non-shiny. Its a quantum state(yay, quantum mechanics) and it wont go away untill you start checking. In case you, reading this, still dont get it. Remember schrödingers cat? Imagine 10000 boxes and only 1 cat alive, but you dont know where it is. This leaves each single box with a 99.99% chance of holding a dead cat. To put it more "adult", this is as certain as using both a condom and the pill(double dutch) preventing pregnancy during intercourse. Sure, it still happens, but its so freakishly rare that its practically impossible to get pregnant while having a double dutch. But its garantueed that 1 cat is alive. This means that one box has a 100% chance of having a living cat where 9999 boxes have a 100% chance of having a dead cat. These paradoxes are paradoxes because they are intertwined with special relativity. Since its just the probability, the key part of the entire thing of why its a paradox is because no one checks. If you look at that grasspatch in general, none of the patches holds a shiny, but the entire patch is garantueed to have a shiny. Meaning the entirety of the patch is in a quantum state where it both has and hasnt got a shiny(because its garantueed to have one). Yeah, statistics and mathematics is weird when there are 100% garantuees. They still work, but its because we check. If we stop checking for given garantuees, we'll never find them. Now that tricky one is out of the way. The final one. It is a paradox since tradingsystems dont check who the person is who sends it, just what is registered with the pokeball(as the information stays the same after the transfer), it never registers who secondary or following owners are. And considering the tradingsystem traded the pokemon was a legal one(even though the pokemon was gotten in an illegal way), the one leaving with the pokemon is the rightful owner to the traded one because both sides were willingly trading pokemon with each other. This problem, like the previous one, is based on a lottery, but has nothing to do with special relativity, so dont worry. Now lets imagine if someone steals 10$ to buy a lottery ticket and win the jackpot. Does that mean the jackpot is yours because he bought the ticket with it? Or does it belong to him since he bought the ticket, even though it was stolen money? This one is more similar to the third one actually, since its a grey area. Because in reality, he owes you what was stolen, not what he aquired with what was stolen. If what was stolen has been unretrievably lost, we hit a grey area which again requires a debate with tons of arguments and a jury. Some will end up giving the original owner the retrieved pokemon, others will end up requiring the thief to either refund and otherwise compensating with interest(which in case of the jackpot means the original owner always at least gets 10$ back because what thief is idiotic enough to trade back the jackpot?), but since pokemon are more specific and the question is just about the pokemon in question, I'd say that legally it belongs to the thief due to the trading machine regulations, but that doesnt mean the thief isnt required to get the pokemon back that he stole. You can slap an answer on them after looking for details, but that doesnt mean the answers are correct. I agree the first one does have an answer(its based on a parallel universe where there is a parallel earth, but what they call water is a substance of XyZ instead of H2O). But instead of calling different substances the same name its a bit easier since they call the same thing different names based on what they say, which already happens in the real world, sort off. But the others dont have a definite answer, just a conclusion in a grey area based on laws and regulations. Since everything luckily takes place in 1 pokemon world where the laws are pretty much universal no matter what, its a bit easier to conclude what they most likely end up with: 1- just lingual difference in hearing what an animal says, I hear miauw, others hear meow or nyan. Its just a silly thing to call animals to what they say anyway. Imagine calling different dog species bark, woof, arf or roof. 2- surprisingly, we dont have to look very far for this one, as in generation 4 we get a palpark and recatch pokemon that already have been caught in gen 3, meaning that the old pokeball isnt usable on the pokemon after its replaced(in contrary to pc's). 3- Since I already talked about the legality, as soon as the battle ended, the contract would be declared void since the battle regulations are a stronger regulation than a freelance teacher and a student with a vocal contract. Meaning whoever loses has to pay the winner of the battle and are not bound to the student-teacher contract. 4- another easy one, the shiny was garantueed to be in there. The rest doesnt matter much. Probablistically seen, its in a quantum state because one is garantueed, meaning there is no way to tell if its there(which sounds weird, but trust me, the entire reason why shinies work in the game is because they arent pre-programmed to appear in wild encounters). 5- The recieved pokemon belongs to the thief, legally seen. I think I already explained why.

Nice essays, think you'll get an A+

If you dont like discussions, stay away from them. Simple as that. Discussions get people thinking and theorizing in the first place. Your favorite fanbased theories? Yeah, tons and tons of discussions for each single one of them. Either join them or stay out of them, dont critique the discussion itself.

Predated O Dang, I was just joking. I do the same thing on here, but the KZfaq comments section isn't the most traditional place for them. So take a joke.

ScorpionClaws86 Gaming here

ScorpionClaws86 Gaming here

ScorpionClaws86 Gaming Here

ScorpionClaws86 Gaming WE HETE

YUUUP!

Lol

The egg. Seriously, that is not a paradox. Chickens are not at all the first creatures that would lay eggs. It would be reasonable to say that millions of eggs were laid before the first chicken came to be. Furthermore, if it's given that the egg is a chicken egg, then, going by evolution, two birds, of the same or different species, did you-know-what and created a chicken egg.

Due to Charles Darwins evolution theory it would be the egg since evolution happens between each generation meaning that when chickens finally became chickens it would have came out of an egg.

Andre Stewart I know the answer to it it's BOTH the chicken came inside the egg

the egg

There was no egg, only Zuul

Arthur Newton How?

Arthur Newton dialga sends ash and the rest back in time to prevent arceus from attacking, but if they fixed the problem then they wouldnt need ro go back in time in the first place

The movie ends with essentially Dialga being in its own flow of time basically just think about it as the way Xenoverse Works Dialga keeps things in a separate time of its own so nothing that happens in the past or the future will affect something that has been changed by the time bubble

thats not how probability works. after checking 8191 patches of grass you would know that the last one has 1/1(=100%) chance to have a shiny. thats wrong. each tile has a 1/8192 chance every time. thats why you can get a shiny after 20 trys or after 1 million. or get 50 shinys in a row. veeery unlikely, but possible.

@@mrnoneofurbusiness7942 shiny Pokémon aren’t caused by probability in this situation. If we know there’s a shiny then everything that’s not a shiny increases the chances of finding it

Sinera And then Giovanni would send it right back because after all this time he's never said he wanted it in the first place. Though it would probably mysteriously learn an entirely new move that way like Yanma did when they tried to send it to the boss (hey he's a gym leader for a reason)

pokemons.....why? just. WHY?

The Yanma had AncientPower when it was traded to him. Since he never let it out of the ball, it didn't evolve until it got back to Jessie

PhoenyxRysing It also isn't a trade evolution though.

I know. Since it learns AncientPower through leveling up, it would have been right about to evolve, but it couldn't do that while in the Pokeball. Remember when Koga's Venonat did the same thing?

The OT will be the person who you just traded with.........

Really I though it stays

hang on let me do some tests

According to the wiki the OT stays

Magic is right, OT is Original Trainer

SirRilic She got over it

Shannon Deonier well I know that (btw alolan vuloix is the cutest thing ever) but I still have a point. lillie isn't the only person in the anime to have a crippling poke-phobia. in the hoenn anime there was also a child unable to make contact with his pokemon

SirRilic and what about the time in the games when she literally carried THE HEAVIEST POKEMON IN EXISTANCE IN HER BACKPACK???

Paul Leszczensky Lillie is a strange entity

SirRilic You mean Tory from the Deoxys movie? ...oh man I HOPE we get Lillie angst like he got, since his was caused by being in a stampede as a kid and we all know how terrible Lillie's backstory is.

1 say I'm pregnent.

Zz Blast lol

Zz Blast so cringy

Say that you have a shiny lucario

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO but shiny lucario sucks ass

Suniti Bose or you saying that

And you said to think of a joke not typing one

Suniti Bose HAHAHA this is the best joke ever!

Suniti Bose iii

and the elite 4

Dont really have one. But my favorite Eeveeloution is leafeon. A good pokemon in my opinion is Zoroark. Its just such a great design. I didn't actually notice it in the shadows until recently

Seadra Limestone gliscor

Law's NE0N X - D | G4MING & LETS PL4Y what if trainer A trade or give a pokemon to trainer B, then trainer B trade the same one to trainer C, if we use your logic, trainer A will receive the pokemon trainer C sent, but that doesn't happen, so the theif would actually have it

Law's NE0N X - D | G4MING & LETS PL4Y u stupid

Mine is Espeon, fight me!

Thanks Dan!

thats true

Thank you!

I have a different explaination: Lets say the traner agreed to trade, the trainer may let someone else put the pokeball in the trading machine and pull the lever. The trade will go, the trainer's pokemon will not belong to him anymore and he will get another one instead. In that case, it dosn't matter if it was theft or a regular trade, the trading machine did it's job. However, in a trade there are two pokemon envolved, the trainer's pokemon will not belong to him anymore, but the other one does. There is also another explanation: What if I borrow you my pokemon with it's pokeball? Or the thief didn't trade but instead just took the pokeball and released it to battle or something? The pokemon can just ignore the guy who released it and search for it's original trainer. Combining these two possiblities, it seems like the trainer is'nt even matter, the pokemon belong to it's pokeball, not the trainer. The pokemon have it's own will. Even after a trade, the pokemon can just go to find it's original trainer, but the trainer will have to keep it outside of the pokeball because he don't have it.

See this makes sense, except when captured a pokemon is assigned an id, which allows it to be put into storage. The trainer's storage, you cannot put someone else's pokemon into your storage unless the data is edited. Thus the trade machine's necessity. So yeah i can steal your pokemon or borrow it but it wont be mine. The only way to release the pokemon would be to activate the fail safe by destroying it. Going even further you could probably use an empty pokeball, look through the registry, and send the pokemon to the original trainer though storage or warping the pokeball as they do in the show. The difference is what you go by. The game, or anime. In the games, all pokemon are stored in a virtual world, so transferring them is much easier. And i dont mean because it's a game, this is stated in every game. The anime thinks that's to cruel so they have giant open things like oak's lab.

I agree its like buying stolen goods in real life. if you buy or trade for stolen goods or pokemon, even if you do not know they are stolen if the police catch the criminal and he admits he gave them to you they force you to give it back to the victim. So in this case the pokemon would be made by the police to go back to the victim and the guy who treated his pokemon to a criminal would have been screwed that's why you dont buy stolen stuff.

Randy Johnson if you watch the show or know basic science you would know that they would need my amoema,bacteria, and cingle celled organisms to survive

Travis West that doesn't answer the naming conventions and you misspelled single

Zangoose isnt a cat ferret but whatever

My prediction is that Pokémon is in da future because humans decided that animals would go extinct if they didn't act soon so they decided to create a way to capture animals and use them to battle and the animals evolved to new forms to adapt and then they were able to evolve and wow this just sounds stupid now but maybe Pokémon will be our future If it was then that would be so cool

Well, as we know, for example, the Pokemon Pidgey is a bird in our world. But they are also called birds in the Pokemon world. I think, as an example, "bird" is simply what they categorize pidgey and spearow and the rest as.Like we do.

yeah, it's the "Gambler's fallacy"

lol just 3 minutes after i commented, auraguardian did post an explaining comment xd

ChelMaster 04 63%

Glad I could help :)

(fucking died because you noticed me)

oshuwott m8?

Oshawott TV what website is dat!?!!

Who are you?

@@courtneyevie BOTH.