As this video about a wonderful historical game is being published, the real life, modern day nation of Ukraine is under attack. Led by a power hungry and delusional Russian dictator that has filled his people with lies, the Russian military has brutally killed thousands and displaced millions in a backward attempt to restore the long fallen USSR. Board Game Nation believes in the principles of democracy and national sovereignty and that those that violate these principles of peace must be condemned and resisted with every possible means. We sincerely hope that the viewers of this video understand the context of the content and know that we stand firmly with the people of Ukraine in their continuing fight against the Russian aggressors.

First time I ever played A&A 30+ years ago, I played as Russia and bought a battleship as my opening purchase. 10 min later I was watching my friends play A&A.

I think that eliminating that German bomber is worth the loss of the Russian tanks. That bomber causes all sorts or problems for Africa and the British fleet.

Agreed with Board Game Hacker’s comment here, Gary! The time/effort you/your team put into the production of this/all your videos definitely shows! Keep up the great work…and congrats on achieving over 2,000 subscribers! - Howie

This is awesome! Would love to see more content like this for other nations. Or just general strategies for both teams to coordinate on

Good to see strat vids making their way out. I love a&a and missed all the different strat ideas passed around the internet lol. Thanks a million, hope to see more for the other countries

The time put into this vid is astounding. As always, great job!

Really good quality video, subscribed !!

Great video, clear explanations and nice maps to watch. I haven't played online for a long time, but I remember, maybe I'm wrong, that the opening preferred by the best players was the 912, buying 4 infantry and 2 tanks.

Enjoyed- another fun video. Great job as always.

One thing I would like to see is you cover other Axis & Allies games so if you could do that I would love that!

Once again great video

Okay so I haven't even watched the video and I've already subscribed forty-year-old Magic the Gathering axis and allies gamer I'm loving this page already

Great videos! Keep up the good work!

Nice! Thanks for the advice! I will need it for my upcoming game against my brother. I will be playing as the Allies and I need as much info i can get before then. I'm planning to do a A&A Gameplay video sometime in September. I'm still learning how to play it. These videos are great tutorials! I'm looking forward to more of these videos!

miss your videos. could you do one explaining your favorite strategy for the allies in a KGF? i’d be interested to see how you approach the first 3 or so rounds as the US, UK and USSR all together

Just discovered his channel. Recently got back into triplea so great to see triplea getting a nod in your content

So here's how I calculate my odds of a battle. I've used this for years. Tell me what you think of it. 1 point for each die probability (infantry defending at a 2 are 2 points each) PLUS one point for each hit the unit takes. So for example 2 infantry and 1 artillery attacking are: 2 + 3 + 3 = 8 say... versus 3 infantry defending: 3 + 3 + 3 = 9 So... the defense would be favored to win by 1 point. Battleships are the obvious 2 points for being in the battle where everything else is 1 point. So a battleship (attack or defense) is worth 6 points by itself. Anywho, I came up with this system probably 10+ years ago and have used it ever since and it works great.

please introduce some openings for Great Britain, I am not sure whether to strengthen the Indian Ocean Fleet (slows down landing in France) or the Home Fleet (India falls by turn 2). Thank you!

Keep the series up for the other axis and allies power

0:38 "When working out strategies, using the Low Luck dice option is your best bet. It'll give you the closest to average outcomes" - Low Luck and dice are entirely different disciplines. Working out strategies for dice games requires understanding the "flow" of the game, tied to correct modeling of probability distributions, including contingencies for both bad and good luck. Low Luck does not require anything like the same ability to plan for a range of contingencies, instead using accurate prediction for a very small subset of possible outcomes and general strategic and tactical understanding. Please consider keeping Low Luck and dice content separate. Example later. 3:52 "...big fan of the Larry Harris Gencon 3.0 . . . but it has one big drawback." - yes, it is rather ugh. Regular dice and preplaced bid help a lot, as well as balancing the game. 4:35 "the battle in Ukraine . . . without actually taking" - I'd say it's rather more involved. Originally under dice *when there was no German bomber on Ukraine*, the idea *was* to preserve the USSR tanks, as described in the video. But the LHTR change putting the German bomber on Ukraine changed things. Now the USSR tanks are considered a reasonable loss in exchange for the German bomber. Under Low Luck, outcomes are much more tightly controlled. Attacks that are just way too risky under regular dice can be carried out under Low Luck. This does *not* open up a whole new world of possibilities though. An opponent also controls outcomes just as tightly, so counters that don't work under regular dice at all become useful under Low Luck. I forget the numbers, I think Low Luck USSR1 attack-with-intent-to-retreat-USSR-tanks against Ukraine comes out to 43% or something, but under regular dice the numbers are super lousy. Which becomes relevant because under Low Luck a R1 4 inf 2 tank buy under Low Luck combined with R1 tanks retreating from Ukraine combined with tighter outcomes means various G1 capture and hold attempts against Karelia simply have no chance of succeeding (due to the vicious USSR attack-and-retreat option). Without G1 capture and hold of Karelia, there is no G2 placement of units on Karelia, which slows the German advance. I've written elsewhere about the importance of even a single unit in battles of near a hundred units, timings, and such. I shall not elaborate again here. But under regular dice a R1 4 inf 2 tank buy is *extremely* unlikely to offer anything like the same advantage. First, attack-with-intent-to-retreat against Ukraine is nowhere near as consistent as it is in Low Luck. Second, inability to tightly control outcomes means USSR tanks have nowhere near the utility. So why keep Low Luck and dice content separate? In a Low Luck video explaining the Ukraine attack-with-intent-to-retreat, the tactic is successful enough that a player should seriously consider a different purchase to take advantage of the potential position. But in a regular dice video explaining the same action, the tactic is NOT successful enough that much time should be spent on it, except to note the probabilities and say it probably won't work, and to cover briefly what to do and why in the rare case the dice *do* all come up favorably. The focus and explanation are very very different. 5:02 "Low Luck makes this a bit easier to predict" - the implication is Low Luck is just a bit different, but it really is *completely different*. 7:09 "Now the German tanks are stuck on the front line alone" - actually, that probably won't happen. Just as USSR may retreat to Caucasus, Germany may retreat to Belorussia. Of course, with regular dice this may not happen, but with Low Luck it is a certainty - against a competent opponent. 11:42 "(2 Russian fighters on Archangel) . . . Buryatia, in the event that the Japanese decide to make a push north" - sort of. Suppose Japan pushes into Buryatia. What does USSR do? Counter from Yakut with infantry and the Archangel fighters? That means USSR fighters are likely only able to counter into Karelia next turn, then must land on Archangel. If Germany is able to stack Karelia, and/or moves an AA gun in, then that restriction of USSR fighter targets can be an issue. Also, USSR units are needed to build a stack to push back against early German aggression; holding USSR units east means they don't make it back in time to stop the key German timing push into Ukraine and/or Karelia. So actually, Japan is quite eager for USSR to engage in northeast Asia! But USSR fighters on Archangel do prevent Japan from being extra greedy (e.g. hard early shift towards India), and of course there are the other benefits of landing USSR1's fighters on Archangel.

This could be a great series if the other 4 powers had a similar video!

The order of casualty in AXA Online means your defender casualties are already chosen. In the live board game--dont forget, the defender has to choose its casualties and move them to the edge of the battle board BEFORE they see their retaliation (defense) rolls. This nuance means they can't roll then choose the bomber as a casualty--they have to make that choice each round before they shoot back.

wow! nice!

Good video, thanks. I like the artillery/infantry approach. And do not lose your fighters! Draw out the game, and the allies can usually win. How about a UK video? (my favorite country to play)

I've got a strange strategy I'm working on with 3 attacks. All you retreat from after 1st round of combat. You strafe bellorussia with karelia, west russia with moscow, and ukraine with caucasus. The attacks should kill a large chunk of german infantry, leaving more expensive units open to attack later. It also prevents large german counter attack by removing their cannon fodder infantry from the equation. You place 2 inf in karelia and 2 inf 2 art in caucus. You force germany to commit to a fight with less favorability than they might like, or it stalls them, giving your allies a bit more time to help out.

I play A&A with my brother quite frequently, and I always lose Russia as the Allies. I really like your videos and I hope these strategies will help me out!

Great video, I was wondering if you would make videos on global 1940 I’ve watched practically every 1942 video you have but have progressed past that game and was curious what your thoughts are?

What amazing timing! I am just about to play this with my family and I'm Russia. Thanks for the help!

Just found this channel, great content...I wish you would do this type of deep dive into War Room, its such a great game.

Great Video, thanks for making it for us! In regards to the conversation of Germany going all out against a round 1 Soviet Union stack in Western Russia. I don't think it is a very favorable outcome for Germany, although the fact that most calculators don't take into account that AA guns can be set as the first casualties tends to make it look a little better than it really is. If you conducted the battle shown in your video in a random dice game the chance that Germany would've scored that many hits would be around 56% - and the chances for Germany to take that many ( or less ) casualties was only about 34%. The overall odds of Germany destroying all of the Russian Units is around 56% - The "average" German losses in Western Russia would be around 82-84 IPCs, leaving about 3 air units alive, on average. (this isn't counting the IPCs lost in any other battle that round, and the sea zone 7 battle is likely to go far worse than the battle in your example ) So it seems to me that attacking the Western Russia "stack" on G1 is little better than a coinflip, generally will destroy much of Germany's air, and leaves the UK in a position to plop down a fleet and drop troops in Finland on UK 1. As an Axis player, I feel like this would actually shorten the amount of time it would take the Allies to gain an advantage over the Axis, the majority of the time. Sure, if the coinflip goes well, it applies some considerable pressure to Moscow, but since Egypt was uncontested, you now have 2 UK and 1 US & 2 Soviet Fighters that can be in Moscow by the end of SU 2 and 16 + land units as well. Without great German luck in more than 1 battle, I don't see Moscow being in much danger in the long term. Please let me know if I have missed something, or made an error somewhere, but as it stands currently, if I stack Western Russia, and Germany goes all out against it, my only concern is if the Axis gets extremely good rolls on more than one turn, but it seems like a desperation play, when things really aren't that desperate.

Thanks, great video! I' think I'll try the Yak Attack opening. I just got burnt with bad rolls with the 9/12 attack which got me thinking the conservative West Russia only opening might be the better play? I assume that is wrong and the 9/12 works out better on average? I'm new to A&A 1942 and have been getting walloped as the Allies.

I find the in-game battle calculator to be inconsistent. Some games it tells me improbable, then I do the exact same move in the next game and it says favorable.

Hello. Thanks for sharing. I was wondering about the 1st opening. How could the German navy could cross the Turkish Straits ? Last time i played it was forbidden. Thanks.

Hey are you still going to make more strategy videos for 1942? I love this series!

You should do videos for opening moves for every power!

Of all the games of AA I've ever played, I almost always randomly draw Russia. And I've never been able to succeed at all with them. My playgroup (4 guys) have agreed that the person that gets Russia gets to play the leftover Ally too. I'm gonna try the Russian Winter strategy next time!

Thanks for this useful survey. I used to buy 8 inf on T1 for Russia, then realized that for one less total unit I could have 3 arty and 4 inf, so that instead of defending at a total of 16 (8x2) I would defend at 14 (7x2), true, but on a counter-attack I would have 13 (6x2 + 1) instead of only 8 (8x1). I never thought about buying airpower as Russia, but maybe will try that now. I note that as for Steam and the AI engine there when you play this game, as of now at least the German AI never crushes that big stack of 18 or so in W Russia if you play that (I never empty out Cauc. region on T1, just send the heavy stuff in and maybe 1 inf). Also, the Japan AI keeps trying to build industry in Manchuria on T1, even if five Russian infantry, 1 Ru tank, and 1 Yak are all within range for attack on T2. Once you take it the AI goes nuts trying to re-capture it turn after turn after turn, to the detriment of all other priorities. Again, most human opponents won't do this, so when against humans I send Rus units westward as you do in this video.

Do you have any new videos with opening moves for the other four nations?

I only play 1940 Global but the concept of Russia strafing and retreating their tanks out of harm's way is an interesting tactic to be used in that game also. To make Russia a more enjoyable nation to play, I have included in my house rules the additional initial setup of 1 Russian Bomber in Moscow and 1 submarine in the Black Sea (with a naval base) while adding a small bonus to Russia if it has a naval vessel in the Mediterranean. (A successful die roll is required to allow Russian naval forces to transmit the Bosporus that allows permission from Turkey). This does not upset the game's natural balance by much but does give the Russian player more options that helps to offset the mental discomfiture that most Russian players feel under the OB setup rules. While I'm at it, I have eliminated the OB rule that allows individual units of an attacking force to strafe and retreat to an area they originally didn't come from (as what often happens in the Yugoslav strafe when German units "retreat" to Romania). This OB rule allows, for example, an infantry unit to move 2 spaces from their initial starting position in effect walking through an area occupied by opposing forces. It makes no sense to me that units while retreating can choose to go anywhere but backwards and take advantage of a loophole in the OB rules. Retreating units in real life often have to run for their lives. If these house rules explained here make it slightly more difficult for Germany to take Moscow by turn 5 or 6, then so be it. For a player (Russia) to be basically put out of the game so soon is a sad thing and not historically fitting for the country who in reality captured Berlin. Those of you who wish to can certainly add house rules to the axis, but you can certainly understand that these house rules for Russia are not game ending for the axis...DA...SVID...DANYA.

This very helpful. I'm learning to play with a bunch of pros, and I'm always resigned to the frigid North (everyone else has a preferred nation) and having these Russian strats are very helpful. My main question is, if you're rolling low or just getting out played, and forced down to like... 4-5 territories around Moscow, how do you recover? How do you fix the great Russian F**k up? Cause until the next version gives you free kills for the Winter Weather, I'm at a loss.

I don't think I've been playing this game with my friends the way we were supposed to or the way that you do, so I don't know if this was a sound strategy, but I went for 2 fighters and an attack on Finland as my opening move. Of course, all of my friends and I were too attention deficit to ever complete a full game, so I never got to see if it ever panned out.

I tried the yak opening and landed one fighter in Archangel one fighter in Caucasus, and then one fighter to the far east, eventually taking over Manchuria from the Japanese in turn two.

The Crazy Ivan strategy is still the best method of playing Russia. Most players will use a defensive infantry strategy with Russia. Crazy Ivan is a very offensive Russia. As first player, Russia can do a lot of IPC damage to Germany and Japan. Support units are then sent in from UK and America through Finland. Solid strategy if UK, and United States know what your doing.

9:45 that’s so true

Have a Q. I buy max infantry send them south, then push into Scandanavia. That way the British can start landing troops unopposed. Thoughts?

I usually play the 4 yak strategy as well, except I but 2 infantry and two artillery instead of the four infantry. I find that it gives me more counter attacking potential.

Not sure if anyone else has mentioned it but on beamdogs 1942 when you are making amphibius assaults in sea zones with enemy navy then it shows as implausible i guess as an indicator that that combat happening is dependent on the sea battle that must take place first. Its propably just a bug though but for me thats why it happens

The USSR bomber is a miniature of a Pe-8, their only 4 engine bomber before copying the B-29 as the Tu-4

I learned to play Chess, checkers, Monopoly, Mille Bourne, Rummy, and many card games starting at 5 . We used to play board/card games on my friends porch.

Thanks Gary, could you link the 3 battle calculators that you used please

Excuse my ignorance but in the 4th opening I did't understand how russia can have 2 fighters in Archangel at the end of turn 1 (11:33) . Can someone explain pls?

Fan of the airplane purchase on round 1. Just attack with slightly less units but bomber gotta go.

I love this video in a vacuum, but knowing your Allies is a huge part of the strategy. The game for Russia is about surviving since you start at such a disadvantage and waiting for Allies to get involved. In a Kill Japan First game, you want to use a lot more conservative opening and I really like your Russian Winter for that with either the 4inf+3art of 4inf+fighter purchase on turn 1. If you know the UK is going to only try and hold India while looking more at Europe, I think you want to go more aggressive and can afford to take out the bomber in Ukraine if it's there. I love playing UK and I'm one that likes to try and aid the Liberation of Leningrad as early as possible. Landing troops in the north is always a go to move even if I risk losing some navy. I'd rather Germany waste planes in naval battles than aid in Russia. With this mindset, a more aggressive southern strategy for Russia is very beneficial for the overall Allied play. I'm also a big fan of US2 Operation Torch with at least 4 or 6 units landing in North Africa and enough naval power to defend all but an all out air raid. The threat there takes a lot of pressure off Russia as the Germans have to worry about losing Italy for the foreseeable future. I honestly don't like Russia because your strategy feels dictated by the other strategies at the table and survival is not a fun A&A experience.

Off BGN's Yak comment, I'm finding that purchasing two fighters and an artillery seems to be working for me with the 12-9 assumption on the first round with the fighters being housed in the Caucasus. I then buy an additional fighter combined with infantry on the second round and seem to keep the Germans at bay (and spending all their IPC on the eastern front to allow my UK/US fleets to attack France by Round 3 or 4.

Russian 30 openong is a good offensive in my opinion. Im playing against my friend and he doesnt know much about the game. Should I do it or is it too risky?

The "implausable" in Beamdog's Online game comes out on any landing battle when there is any sea zone battle that must precede it, even if both are extremely biased into wins for the attacker. It is thus a bug. Should be fixed. In your example, you'd have gotten another prediction had there not been a UK destroyer that has to be eliminated by the battleship (a 90% or even more chance).

4 men 2 tank buy attacking WR 12 units and Ukraine 9 units is the only way to play… Take Ukraine to buy at least 1 more round, move AA gun to both WR and Ukraine ( normally ) at least 3 tanks and an arty survive, you force G to counter with potential Luftwaffe 🤞

Can attacking infantry retreat? I thought they were committed as they only have one move per turn and the attack move counts as 1.

Have you done other faction strats?

I play Call of War if none of you have heard about it I advise downloading it it is a free-to-play World War simulator that reminds me of Axis & Allies on steroids

Could you do one for A&A 1940?

Option 4 you can actually do 2 infantry 2 artillery 1 fighter

Ready for German openings!

7 infantry and 6 tanks defending against 9 infantry, 4 art, 1 tank, 2 fighters? Sounds like mutually assured destruction.

I would say One tank one artillery and 5 infantry as it gives Russia a strong defence but also can support attacks really well

Have you ever bought a battleship for Russia starting out? It seems to occupy some of the German planes giving hope to keep the British navy somewhat intact.

Germany should keep the default priority for the bomber. Why? It is a key piece for a number of early game strats AND hanging on to it is likely to lure the Russians into losing all of their armor in the Ukraine.

for me, I would go for the Meat stack and keep on buying the stack and move most troops to Moscow and the Caucuses and keep on building that meat stack, and after the US does their 'Normandy invasion ' I would attack the Germans with all I got because I would have approximately 20-30 infantry and Germany's troops would be weakened.

What I've seen so far is that if you (with USSR) leave the German Bomber and Fighter (and the Panzer) in Ukraine alive you'll severely drop the overall chance of Allied success. In order to save those pitiful 2 or 3 soviet tanks by not taking Ukraine is: - 1st not giving you 2 IPC of production - 2nd Allowing the Germans to not waste 22 or 28 IPC for purchasing air units, but build 4 tanks instead - 3rd Egypt's chance of survival with the Bomber present is decreased substantially and this triggers a chain of potentially devastating reactions for the Allies - without the Fighter in Egypt, Britain cannot destroy Japan's navy in zone 37, nor the German Battleship + Transport in 17. Japan can freely conquer most of East Asia and so on. - 4th Russian forces in West Russia are almost certainly doomed. Germany can easily afford 1-1 lose ration against the Soviets.

Can you film videos of the anniversary edition

Do any pros attack the German Baltic fleet first turn with fighters to stop a sea lion attack?

I sort of like buying 4 Russian Tanks, and going for a kill japan first strategy, on turn 2 moving into Asia with 4 infantry and up to 7 tanks. Or turning them against a new German player who decides to put some units in Karelia. It is easy to stamp them out on turn 2 if they put a clump of units there, and Russia has it's 7 tanks and the west Russian meat wall.

online is about manipulating the dice RNG, the game will balance results in the next turn based on the overall amount of power. Then you start to see the Japanese fleet sunk in Indonesia or the Suez canal destroyer sinking the Italian battleship or the one surviving german tank conquering U.K., also if You have 3 bombers will always lose one to AA fire at the first try, you need to wait and have 4. Also, look like there are a lot of scripted results if conditions are met. People complained so much about the RNG the developers added a new "kind" of dice after stating various times that there was nothing wrong with the RNG. I think the problem is to program the dice RNG to "game balance and the fun factor" and not just let the dice be, just random. Anyway the U.R.S.S. default placement it´s wrong, infantry, artillery, and tanks shall cost 1 IPC less and should be at least one tank in the soviet far east. Ironically, the old 90s Axis and Allies cd rom game was better than this 1942 online edition

i would love it if you made a video for UK

9 12 so right

Actually you didn't even show the most conservative strategy of them all. For the USSR to fortify in turn 1 and not attack at all. She can place her fighters and tanks behind the lines and wait for an opportunity here and there to make a small, limited attack when appropriate. I find this strategy, though it may seem boring, to be the best one for ensuring Russian survival. Of course, this depends on the US/UK stepping up and attacking the western front/northern front/African front as soon as possible.

Letting that bomber live really hurts the UK. It sucks to lose your 3 tanks, but it is worth it if you stop Germany from taking Africa. There is definitely a difficult decision to make there. Do you go for the bomber? Or do you try to save Russia's tanks? Which is more important? I always go 4 infantry, 3 artillery and the 9-12 attack. It is dumb that every first move is the same. But, after the first move it is always different. No two games are the same. I recently tried a 4 infantry 2 tanks approach. I saw a pro player use this to prevent Germany from counter attacking on turn 1. Edit: I realized that the latter half of this comment made no sense. My brain must be totally fried.

Found defending Russia as the Allies to be an almost impossible task. Last time I tried it the strategy was basically Britain building tanks in India every round and sending them into the Caucuses and America sending fighters over via Alaska. All that hardware kept the Germans at bay but Japan was basically free to do what it wanted. India and China both fell and eventually Moscow was taken from the east. Will have to try again with one of these strategies.

Using Low luck I come into the Ukraine with the usual but without the Second fighter, it Usually leaves the German Bomber as the surviving unit after I retreat- afterwards that 2nd held back fighter non coms to Egypt to prevent the German invasion despite that surviving Bomber (The odds being against German invasion), so My UK Egypt fighter can help destroy that sz 37 fleet with Low luck usually in UK's favor!!!

7:30 strafe and retreat to Belorussia?

Your only looking at low luck, which you cannot do during rank play online.

Can we have this but 1940 global?

If I was Germany after the Ukraine strafe, I’d leave Russia alone, purchase a lot of infantry, and consolidate all my tanks into the baltic states

buy 1 fighter and as many inf as you can every single turn

FORTRESS KARELIA

Maybe I might actually win play Russia this time!

How is retreating from Ukraine a smart play if the bomber can then be used to help the Germans take Egypt?

why are you doing all these with low luck ? i dont mind but i never saw you play lowluck in your videos. the 1st opening problem is not the 8 infantry buy but their combat moves. buying 8 infantry and doing normal attacks ( ukraine + west russia ) is a lot better ( although the inf+ arty is better imo ). opening 2: germany can strafe attack either west russia or ukraine, he dont have to commit ( although i didnt do the math there with this version ). i used to play2nd edition for the longest time then switched to tripleA client and played a lot of NWO and WaW.

Is there EVER a time that the USSR can build even a meager navy? I hate to see all those Russian naval pieces just collect dust! :D

I've never played a game that allowed the russians to attack on the first turn.

Forgive me, I am by no means a pro. But if the bomber is in Ukraine (not to mention that this strategy often spares the fighter as well), why wouldn't you want it? Yes, the tanks are very good on attack and defense and you will lose them. However, knocking that bomber out prevents bombing runs on the caucuses (or russia, i guess), hinders German control of Africa, hinders German resistance to naval approaches, and spares England from ipc loss. In a KJF, yes, i can see leaving the bomber up to offer yourself a longer bulwark and 1-2 improved trades down the line, or even a blitz. But in a KGF (which i much prefer) wouldnt russia want to limit german air power the only time they will have an opportunity to, and then sort of turtle up until their allies make them an opening? Following that up, is stacking 5 north of manchuria bad? And why do most of your strategies send them all east. I virtually never pull those seven away until turn 3 or 4 if they are pushing asian mainland. If they go in on the 5 their air power and transport are occupied T1, and you still have 2 to play the stalling game with. if they leave manchuria open (or even worse, build a factory) you have a shot at a cheeky play, and regardless, a KGF will need to put pressure on germany before your forces in european russia collapse, those troops will rarely save the day going west. a KJF will benefit from a russian infantry base on land if you choose the north pacific. if you choose the south, preventing them ipc gain outside of central asia will limit japanese options, keep your IPC a little higher, and lower their "free" ipc. other than that, insightful information, some new, some i knew. Good vid. I may sacrifice my artillery for that fighter sometime.

Did you just endorse low luck play? I concur, lol

Germany = All tanks (its unstoppable)

All tanks for Russia