So am I 😂

Me too. 😂

emotional iq is not a thing

@@orwellianreptilian2914 It is a thing. And you might as well are not so emotionally intelligent from your comment.

​@@justascaredpussycat1869 Intelligence doesn't necessarily determine how well you learn something but how fast. "Knowing" is a product of reinforcement (ie repetitious behavior). If a more intelligent person had interest in emotion, a less intelligent person could not compete. Period. This is the same difference between intelligence and education. Education is "practice." Intelligent people (let's say Elon Musk and the like) are incredibly emotionally sensitive, they're just not as interested in them as they are other things. Most people pressured in the way that he applies to himself would crumble. What you're talking about is a "people vs things," thing ("interest"). Every study ever, says that intelligence is general (hence the name). This not only includes emotional sensitivity and tolerance but even expresses as a function of involuntary motor reflexes... More complex synaptic patterns, quantity of neurons and thicker myelin sheath covering them, allowing for faster and more efficient transmission of electrical impulses; extending to the nervous system and organ regulation. It's one of the strongest predictors of health, wealth, athleticism, happiness, etc... Pretty much everything under the umbrella of success and well-being. And, as of yet, there is no known (ie like zero) correlation between intelligence and morality, as understood using current measurements. However, there is of personality traits that manifest as "interest." EQ is a set of learned behaviors. It's multidimensionally subsidized by the parameters that (in part) define the capacity for sensitivity to the recognition and interpretation of sensory input. Not the other way around, or "a separate thing." Do you think that a person who can see well, simply has "good eyes?" That information needs to be translated and manipulated to be acted upon and most of this occurs unconsciously. The same is true for seeing in the dark, it's not just "seeing," but a function of contextual pattern recognition, recall, attention, etc. This doesn't mean that "bad eyes" = "bad brain." It means that "good eyes" will "see better" with a better brain. And by "see" (in this context) I mean, "interpret input." You have no idea what you're talking about... I know because I know that I don't... Stop reading "feel good" articles... They'll rot your brain. Not everything that is written is true. Become more skeptical, of everything, including yourself (and especially yt videos). Tell me again what I don't know...

More to come!

Your brilliant.

That is self-discipline, not genius.

more like, "saw yourself in it."

Now that I have finished watching this, I still don't understand if I fit; to me, this seems like the average of the people whom I grew into a teenager with, in Davis California. Thank you, for the food for thought ("

@@Jacq.b.Prince-hu1wn youll notice this about every superficial video describing "genius," its arbitrary and vague such that almost anyone can imagine themselves within the provided framework. its a clickbaity "feel good" video, hence the ending about "everybody being special." if every person were "special," then no person would be

lmao

How did he know it? 🤔🤭

Good question.🤔

Morons are never curious about different sorts of things to expand their knowledge. That's why they are morons, like trump. Musk has his own brand of genius. No one in this world could get to be the world's richest man if he's not a genius at something. He might not be great with emotional intelligence or some other stuff but he's definitely a genius in making money.

Nah bro yo hatin

Harmful? I think if people believed in themselves more they would also achieve more.

Yeah, but they misspelled genius. In referring to moscow musk it is spelled “geniass”