Ron, Thank you very much for the kind words. That really means a lot coming from you! I watch your channel a lot keep up the great work as well! --Jeremiah

They are certainly not cheap and not for everyone for sure, but it is a quality rifle out of 40 loads tested not a single group exceeded 1 MOA all were 5 shot groups. That kind of accuracy is pretty impressive. We thought it made for a great platform to test the 6mm Creedmoor and really see what good loads could do in this rifle. That is the only downside to the rifles it's cost. Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment we greatly appreciate it! --Jeremiah

And it will do it consistently, truly it will do it all day long with a good load! It is probably one of the nicest rifles we have featured on the channel thus far. Thank you for watching! --Jeremiah

They certainly know how to build a sweet shooting rifle, I was very impressed with the overall performance on this one! Thank you for watching! --Jeremiah

Thank you very much for the kind words and taking the time to comment God bless you as well! --Jeremiah

You are very welcome, give them a try and let us know how they do for you. This rifle was a perfect test platform for the loads as it was super accurate and very consistent! Thanks for watching! --Jeremiah

Indeed it is, it was very impressive what the rifle was capable of and the 6mm Creed is also great! Thank you for the kind words and all the continued support it is greatly appreciated! --Jeremiah

Thank you it is a shooter for sure! Thanks for watching! --Jeremiah

Really? That is cool, I do love the countryside over here and spend a great deal of time out in it. We have been based in Prescott AZ for a very long time. The company that published Handloader magazine whom I work for has been here for over 55 years! Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

Thank you very much for the kind words and taking the time to watch and comment! Sounds like you are putting together a very nice rifle and components equally nice! Good shooting and handloading to you! --Jeremiah

Thank you very much, it is not easy to hold such small groups across large sample sizes! Indeed I really like the twin ejector setup on this rifle and the m16 style extractor as well. It truly is a fantastic rifle, probably one of the best built rifles we have had on the channel so far. That is really good information, a lot of folks want to say they are the same and while they may be similar ballistically speaking they are certainly not the same. That is really interesting to hear from someone who has experiacne with both cartridges, thank you for taking the time to share that valuable info here in the comments section we greatly appreciate that and feel it adds a lot of value to the comments section on our videos! Thank you again for the kind words and taking the time to watch and comment! --Jeremiah

Thank you very much and thank you for watching! --Jeremiah

Glad to hear it thank you for taking the time to watch and comment, we don't post quite as often as others about every 2-3 weeks depending on what is going on but we do try to provide the best information we possibly can. The bench is a Konig Jager super bench and sadly the company is no longer in business these days we refer others to Stukey's Sturdy Shooting Benches as a replacement they are high quality and portable as well. We used one in our 7mm Rem Mag vs. 28 Nosler video. --Jeremiah

Thank you for the kind words and feedback, it is greatly appreciated! Indeed I honestly think this rifle shoots better than I am capable of with the current setup. The groups were very satisfying it was actually hard to pick targets for this video as there were so many good groups to choose from. The bench is a Konig Jager Super Bench, I sadly don't think they make the bench any longer or at least I have not seen one for sale in many years. These days as a substitute we recommend Stukey's sturdy shooting benches they are portable and very very sturdy. I shot my first group in the .0s off of one of those benches. It was an air rifle at 10 meters mind you but still a lot of fun and not as easy as you'd think. At any rate thank you for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

Thank you very much it is an accurate rifle and it was not easy to hold such small groups consistently, I am sure the rifle is more accurate than I am given my current setup. Thank you so much for watching and for the kind words! --Jeremiah

I am a huge fan of the 85 grain controlled chaos bullets they simply work wonderfully, Lehigh makes some outstanding products! We are actually in Arizona so we don't have much for Pig or Hog hunting I usually have to go out of state for that unless you count javelina that we have a decent amount of and I enjoy hunting those with handguns. Thank you very much for the kind words and subscribing we greatly appreciate it and it really helps us spread good reliable and honest information to folks who are interested! --Jeremiah

That is a great bullet for sure, very accurate, in fact one of the most accurate bullets that we tested! Thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts we always appreciate it! --Jeremiah

Indeed ballistically speaking they are very similar as we stated in the video and it sounds like you have two very nice rifles. It is certainly not for everyone, thank you for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

Gotta love those 108s they are great bullets, thanks for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

Sadly it is a Konig Jager and as far as I know they are no longer in business these days we recommend Stukey's Sturdy shooting benches as an alternative they are very nice, sturdy to shoot benchrest off of and are also portable. I would suggest looking into them. Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

I am still working on getting a rifle chambered in the cartridge I have a few prospects, it's in the works but probably won't be till the end of this year the way things are looking. It is tough these days getting components assembled for these videos sadly. Thanks for watching and keeping me honest on the 300 PRC we'll get to it hopefully sooner rather than later! --Jeremiah

Thank you very much for the feedback, we saw a lack of good consistent shooting and load development on KZfaq so we wanted to change that. Overall folks seem to be very happy with the videos but the feedback is always appreciated. Great question sadly they no longer make this bench as far as I know, it is a Konig Jager super bench and I sadly have not seen one for sale in many years. These days we recommend Stukey's sturdy shooting benches they are great for stability and are also portable as an added bonus. Thanks for taking the time to watch and comment! --Jeremiah

Thanks

@@marksummerlin976 you are very welcome! --Jeremiah

Great question, I wish I had better news for you. It was custom made for us by a company called Konig Jager, Super Bench and they are sadly not making them any longer. Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

I apologize for that mix up that was in fact a 103 grain ELD-X bullet not a 108 they are so close it's easy to get those mixed up when you are shooting hundreds of each! Probably doesn't help that with my sloppy handwriting an 8 and a 3 can get mixed up easily. Thank you for watching and for the kind words! --Jeremiah

Believe it or not I did not change the seating depth, that was simply a little variance in the load itself and conducting a more statistically significant sample size showed that. The average for that load was right around .45 MOA for 30 rounds. The best target at .35" and the worst was around .60" if memory serves me correctly. That is one reason to always confirm your loads and make sure that your .35" group wasn't just statistical noise so to speak. It also certainly helps to have a good test platform such as this AllTerra Rifle. Great question though thank you so much for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

@Handloader TV thats funny, look at everyone quoting hornady's podcast now.🤦🏻‍♂️ lol

@@reloadingfun You know what is even more funny... Did I quote Hornady or did Hornady quote us? Handloader magazine 1990, Number 147 September-October page 42 "Groups, Statistics and Practical Facts" "How many shots make a group?". This is just a single instance over many many years in print. So the real question is who quoted who? --Jeremiah

@Handloader TV haha, did you do that test in 1990? 😉. Well, whoever did it first, I guess, either way, nobody has cared to mention it in everyday conversation until hornady did their podcast.😉 Yeah, this groups gets bigger the more shots you take knowledge has been around for a long time. All joking aside, I don't totally agree with some of the stuff Miles and the balistician said on either of their podcast. On their follow up episode, they make all the same claims but then go on to say, well, f-class and benchrest shooters might benefit from a full on load development, i.e. primers, seating depth, powder charge etc... It was definitely a poor execution of presenting the facts. Anyway, thanks for the videos, I really enjoy them and can't wait for the next cartridge and rifle. Any chance you'll dive deeper into load development to see how much better you can make them? Maybe you could incorporate some statical information. Maybe a video version of that article you mentioned above.

@@reloadingfun ha ha We did all the way back then, folks like to chase the next thing and they forget easily there wasn't social media to constantly give folks anxiety about what doesn't work and what does work. The key takeaway is validate your loads by sample size, shoot 5 groups of 5 and if it's consistent chances are you have a very good load. If you can read between the lines a little bit on what they were saying you can get the point they are trying to make. Overall I think they did a decent job explaining their primary point but some of the anecdotal points could have been better articulated. There can certainly be benefit from finding proper powder charge weight and good case fill ratios for the powder. That is essentially what we do for all of our videos where we are conducting load development. I would say you can generally speaking tweak powder charges to achieve nearly the same thing as seating depth. However there are a lot of variables that come into play in that scenario as well particularly Ogive design for the bullet you are using. Perhaps we should do a video series on load development and what we do and present some of the other options as well start to finish using different methods. I don't think anyone has really done that as far as I know. You are very welcome!! Thank you so much for watching, we greatly appreciate it along with the feedback. We want to cover what folks are interested in. We have a load development on 5.56 in the works currently and should be the next big rifle video we do. I think the load development would be fun and informative, select one accurate rifle we have a baseline for and try a couple of different methods for load development with it and see what we can come up with. I am not aware of such a test ever happening other than a few times in the magazine but not much statistical difference with sound methods. I appreciate the feedback! --Jeremiah

Indeed the two are very similar, both good cartridges in their own right. Thank you for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

We currently are unaware of anyone who has pressure tested 10mm +P data ourselves included. SAAMI has set maximum pressure at 37,500 PSI we have plenty of loads that approach that figure but none that exceed that figure. Currently there is no standard for +P 10mm ammunition and until there is I would advise against going over the 37,500 PSI pressure standard the gains you would achieve versus the wear and tear and potential damage to the firearm just doesn't seem to make sense. With proper powder selection you can stay under that 37,500 PSI figure and still push a 180 grain bullet to 1,350 FPS. Which is quite impressive all things considered we do have data for that on our loadData website if you wanted to check that out. Great question I hope that all makes sense and if you have any further questions don't hesitate to reach out! --Jeremiah

It is not a cheap setup that is for sure I believe they start out at around 6K, and go up from there depending upon the options you want. I would say the quality and performance is on par if not better than Gunwerks though if that gives you an idea on the pricing. They have a really nice build a rifle location on their website that is fun to play around with. I think this particular one was valued at 8K once it was all said and done so certainly not cheap but it made for a great platform to test loads in and see just how good the loads actually were. Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

Nothing wrong with the 6mm Remington other than being a little hard to find brass for currently. I actually have a beautiful Remington Custom shop rifle in 6mm Remington sitting in the vault right now just waiting on components so I can do a video on that. Thanks for watching! --Jeremiah

Hornady is making brass PPu is making brass Have bought 100 of each in the last 9 months

Thank you very much for the kind words and the continued support we greatly appreciate it! These videos are a lot of fun to put together and are actually easier than the magazine! Of course the magazine is what pays the bills and it's much easier to present load tables in the magazine and provide more detailed information in. We'll certainly keep having fun with these though and the magazine as well. Thank you for all the support over the years it is greatly appreciated, you are certainly one of our biggest fans and we appreciate it! --Jeremiah

These rifles certainly are not built for everyone, and if you know what you are doing I have no doubt about the Remington 700s being great actions and accurate rifles. One of my Custom Rifles was built on a Remington 700 action and it's a tack driver. However it is nice to see a company make a quality product and it made for a great platform to test some loads in and see just how good the loads were and not have to worry about the rifle being picky or Etc. If you pick up a copy of the latest (Spring Varmint Rifles and Cartridges) magazine there is a photo of a 100 round group that measures right around .8 MOA and it's across 20 different loads many different bullets and powders. So really what you are paying for is that consistency. Probably something that should have been explained more in the video. At any rate thank you for watching and taking the time to comment the feedback is always appreciated! --Jeremiah

@@HandloaderTV Yes that's true. You're paying the extra for consistency across many potential loads. For me though, prices like that will always be WAY too high for me to consider. Just because I understand the value of my dollars and the time and effort it took to earn it AND knowing that I can do the work myself. :) I do appreciate your willingness to allow debate on your channel about such things. Many Gun tuber channels will just hide your comments from view and censor you if you post an opposing viewpoint even in the slightest. They'll go so far as to mock and insult you while they do it knowing that you can't respond again. It's about the lamest tactic there is I think. :)

@@Rico11b Indeed, and as I stated these rifles are certainly not for everyone and I think it is great that there are folks out there who are accurizing rifles themselves. There is no shame in that, If I didn't do this for a living there I probably wouldn't have one of these rifles either. It is my pleasure, I have yet to block anyone on this channel and that is in spite of having many rude folks comment. I have threatened it once when there were literally no other options left, I actually had folks email me asking me to block him lol but he quit his shenanigans and all was well. I think it adds a lot of value to the comments section to hear from others and get different opinions on rifles, loads, cartridges etc. As long as I am doing this that will never happen. This is a place where folks can come to learn and glean from others experience. I wouldn't be the handloader I am today if it wasn't for others sharing their knowledge and opinions with me. There is no reason we can't have a cordial debate or chat here in the comments section. It is for that reason I think we have the best subscribers and comments section in the firearms industry. Thank you for contributing to that and taking the time to comment back the feedback and support is greatly appreciated! Hope to see you in future videos! --Jeremiah

Hi there, great question and comment thank you for taking the time to write that out. We have considered measuring the noise difference with suppressors but have never gotten around to doing so. Also we have considered doing it for muzzle brakes as well but the equipment to do it properly is rather expensive and it would be a little labor intensive to set up and there are already plenty of folks doing a good job of measuring the noise levels of suppressors. I will say this when I shot this rifle with only a over the ear muffs as seen in the video the noise level was not uncomfortable and recoil was quite pleasant. Most good brakes do a good job of directing the noise and blast away from the shooter. This is great for the shooter but unpleasant for the guy sitting next to him. To be honest I did not like Brakes until I started shooting hundreds of rounds a day testing various guns. Now to answer the second part of your question that one is a little more complicated, You can run the match on a rifle without a brake easy enough. That is not hard to do at all you have a projectile weight, velocity and energy at the muzzle, weight of the rifle those all follow basic laws which can be calculated our easy enough. However the addition of a brake or suppressor greatly complicated that recoil equation. Currently we do not have a really good way to measure that recoil on rifles. However I do have some things in the works to measure it in pistols locked into a Ransom Rest. Thanks to the consistency of the Ransom Rest it lends itself well for measuring felt recoil and comparing different loads. However comparing it in different handguns again gets a little more tricky because every handgun is different and not all of them sit in the exact same location in the Ransom Rest. However for testing reduced loads there are plans to test those and get some real world data collected. Great question and we greatly appreciate the feedback and suggestions, please keep them coming! If we can get enough interest in the subject perhaps we can justify purchasing some force gauges and measuring felt recoil. Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment! --Jeremiah

@@HandloaderTV Thanks for responding. Having been on the wrong end of a gun with a brake and feeling the hot gasses on my arm and face more than once from the guy next to me, I'm a tad touchy about the subject. But I can understand how repeated shooting without one could get tiresome. Maybe this will degenerate down to another campfire debate that never gets resolved but keeps us talking forever, like the big bore/small bore arguments of Keith and O'Connor legend.

@@williamkaiser8067 I can understand that, I have been in the blast zone of guns with brakes as well and they certainly are not fun to be around. However, they are fun to shoot provided you have adequate hearing protection. I think the trade off is more than worth it with some cartridges and completely ridiculous in others, 6mm Creedmoor is certainly riding the line, for competition purposes I would say it's worth it. I am sure it's debatable but so long as it's based on fact and practicality I welcome all the debate I think it helps us grow learn and educate. Thank you for taking the time to comment! I only wish it did not take so long to get back to folks. We get a lot more comments now but that is a good thing! --Jeremiah

The Ruger American Predator rifles are nice and they do shoot good, I actually one one myself. With that said there really is no comparison between the two. Across 20 different loads and 100 rounds of ammunition firing 5 shot groups this rifle was capable of holding a 1.4 MOA or less group with human error that is extremely impressive and I know for a fact there is no way my Ruger American could do that. There is an article in our Varmint Rifles & Cartridges magazine detailing this and showing a picture of the group. All in all this rifle is extremely impressive the quality and consistency and tolerances this rifle is held to is on a completely different field compared to the Ruger American. I really don't think it would be a fair comparison. Also as noted in the video we had 30 round groups fired in 5 shot strings group into .5 MOA, once again my Ruger American can do that consistently like this rifle did. This is not to say that the Ruger is a bad rifle or anything like that simply that they are on two very different ends of a spectrum. Now is the cost versus gain for the average shooter worth it, no probably not unless you were competing or were truly looking for an edge and were willing to pay for it. However most goals and practical shooting could be accomplished by the Ruger American so I get what you are saying. To be clear though these rifles are not even close to being comparable in terms of consistency, accuracy and quality. We greatly appreciate you taking the time to comment and we always appreciate the feedback and taking the time to watch. Hopefully this doesn't come off as too harsh or anything like that it, I say all of this with the upmost respect and kindness in tone. --Jeremiah