1984-not a movie, but a documentary, now.

The main difference is is that leftists do not like to leave their echo chambers whereas conservatives are much more likely to at least check out the other side.

Yes. But seeing the worst of both sides, it can be difficult.

@@Scroolewse This definitely isn't true across the board. Age plays a huge factor as well as just simple personality differences. For example, being high in trait openness. There's been a bit of research on the subject and conservatives are on average lower in trait openness and less likely to stray from sources that confirm their bias, but liberals are more quick to align themselves with views shared within echo chambers. We can all do better, and trying to pigeonhole people on the "other side" is counterproductive.

Cyanopteryx does that mean basically conservatives are more likely to think independently but less likely to change their opinions and liberals are more likely to listen to other views but also more likely to quickly agree to commonly shared views within their communities

@@Scroolewse Suuure. Every side likes to think they're the most open-minded, but what reason does anyone have to believe that? Most conservatives I know only interact with the left by watching hyper-edited soundbites on KZfaq.

Me either but I enjoyed listening to him.

It should be on everyone's recommended videos feed. It's time to grow people.

@@derrickmatthews810 I agree

Police brutality exists, I'll give that, still, I don't like it that the big tech companies are working together to brainwash America

Goddam true...especially in the political and economic context of TEDx, which is nothing else than a "marxist globalist" banner for propaganda!-)

Yes open your brains cause the same people are lying about hydroxychloroquine are the same ones putting chips in the brains of their patients. Wake up people! These large corporations are all connected.

@@iamyourtugabro8325 you couldn't debunk anything he said if you tried, and I know damn well you won't...do it, I dare you...

Bot lookingh hgood

tripJJ Wrong.

tripJJ nope. Not even close.

@POKER ANARCHY @Steven A. How?

Yeah pretty much

tripJJ Google's Erick Schmidt once said that many of the trolls in comment sections are actually bots.

Eyjolfur Kari yea, I was with him up to that point lol

That's exactly what I thought.

I know!

Tariq Nashhheeeeiiitttt

Lol yeah, that's one of the left's intellectual heavyweights rofl

Its the alt-right getting angry at getting exposed

i just ignored tariq (it made me cringe) and loved everything else

Same

Keeping Silence I don't even know who that is. And frankly, it shouldn't matter. His good points should stand on their own regardless of his external preferences.

Gonna be honest, not 100% sure on who Tim Wise is

And they do, but honestly it's a pretty big red flag if he's seen much of Tariq's output and thinks he makes good points

and how do you feel 4 years on in the age of censorship silencing of different viewpoints and only the powerful controlling the conversation and muzzling the opposition?

@@philtate1029 In a nutshell? I'm sad to say, every day it feels like people are less and less willing to try to understand one another.

Perfectly stated

It's not only the path to self-growth, but the path to societal evolution. This is fundamental if we're to survive the next 50 years.

Exactly. They are the ones, along with all of us, who need to reflect on the viewpoint presented.

Have to agree with you on that one, I will call it one sided thinking!

Check out the Tariq Nasheed & Jared Taylor debate lool

Facts 👏🏽👏🏽

@@oooweebaby4483 I love that debate jared wipes the floor wit him

@@NYCfrankie Jared is a white nationalist

Yeah I agree, I was a libertarian when I was younger (personal responsibility) and grown to be more left and cognizant of the reality of racism and capitalism, now I dont really know wtf I believe in, social democracies with gun rights and reparations?

interesting what pain is that? (asking as a white girl maybe it's different for boys, but I've had no pain I didn't understand (except from my mother, but that's another story

We just don’t want our countries overrun by people who hate us.

He dindu nuffin

A pointless point that makes no sense. Was there something you were trying to say there?? Just wondering...

The point was a quote from the speech: "...love God, this country, and mean it." There are those on the "right" that do not hate or disrespect people based on color. That quote indicates he heard some of the "regular-right."

I agree, but the media insists on calling the conservatives the alt right when in actual fact they are completely different.

di brentley 100% correct

Says the right-wingers who insist the entire left-wing is nothing but antifa SJWs. Nuance on both sides or none at all, thanks.

All those boomers need to die.

Desperate for an opportunity to clap away their white guilt.

This may be a laughtrack-it's that inappropriate at times....

What is stranger is the fact that the crowd is MOSTLY WHITE, no? There were some Asians and maybe 2 or 3 African Americans in those shots. And how do you know if the whites who were "tittering" were not liberal?

On a second viewing, the only problem with my conjecture though is that the laughing is heard when the camera is just on him too, and then, when they give shots of the audience, the laughing seamlessly continues. So I guess the likelihood is that it's NOT a laughtrack. Still weird though.

Absolutely.

Barry Allard you don't know me. And yes it does

Barry Allard can you explain why it doesn't?

Richard Hamilton 😂😂😂

you have it backwards tim, people are starting to reject globalism due to the proliferation of information. we don't need huge omnipotent institutions to run large groups of people any more, so multinational unions have begun to fracture, because the wealth of information sharing the internet provides makes them redundant. I am not alt-right by the way. I'm a centrist and I don't support a white ethno-state.

^ found the utopian seriously though, globalism isn't a new phenomenon. it's the same mechanism that all empires have used to centralize power. it's the homogenization of peoples and their associated traditions and cultures. in your utopia, yes, globalism is great. maybe we will get there in 2000 years provided we don't drive ourselves to extinction. but right now, people across the world are very different, and they are not going to willingly give up their culture for some sort of ideal. you need to be more pragmatic. humanity isn't ready yet.

red pilling is a great figure of speech. i dont care about the political connotation, i like the meaning. and yes, on most days i am further left than democrats, albeit much more libertarian.

you are right about the benefits of proliferation of information. you are also mostly right about human differences being dependent on culture. the research on that is a little conflicting, but does lean towards nurture over nature. you need to consider the reasons humans naturally want boundaries, both physical and ideological. there are evolutionary reasons for that instinct that predate language. again, you're going all utopian on me. you need to consider human nature and where people are in the world RIGHT NOW, don't focus on idealisms.

those diverse groups do well when they keep to themselves or eat each other

@@M16A1-nw4jy yes

@@gaussminigun7095 I think you missed the point of the talk.

@@milascave2 I'm talking about the asinine quote she found to be oh-so profound

@@gaussminigun7095 tell me you've never seen a coral reef without telling me you've never seen a coral reef

What's wrong with Tim Wise?

Terrible Coughing I don't think you know what ironic means, teabagger.

Peggy Cunningham Probably not fair to call right-wingers “teabaggers” anymore when the current conservative landscape actively opposes all of the Tea Party’s proposed ideals. Maybe “Wall Street rubes?”

NateDogg2888 The teabaggers are still controlled by koch brother weekly emaile talking points and Fox is not real New propaganda, so what's your point again?

And Tariq Nasheed. LMAO

give us a time stamp

its throughout the video after the first couple of jokes. i cant be bothered to watch all 20 min again and post the times.

The real problem is the fake audio rather than the images. Another egregious example of late is Bill Nye Saves the World.

I generally waist my time in these comment section educating bad trolls with facts. But this was hilarious. Hats of sir !!!

?

there's one place we agree.

The Resistance Falasha?

its 20% arab

Do you know how diverse Israel is already? Even within the 75% Jewish population of Israel, there is still racial diversity.

Israel needs 100% more Palestinians!

So you think that dialogue should be opened which was his point but somehow you don't agree?

And bubbles always end up the same way: explosion

Marius Rosier it’s a bubble not a pressure chamber. Lol. Bubbles can be popped easily. When they pop they will see patience, manners, and shame we’re all already right there.

at least they pop easily, and amuse cats and babies!

lol precisely

I'm in Europe. I don't know Tariq Nasheed. Could you enlighten me please ?

Pierre Vinarnick to sum it up he is one of the many worse people on KZfaq

@@alpha-1redrighthand829 ty! Nice nickname by the way. Used to sell Space Marines ;)

Pierre Vinarnick an opportunist who race baits for capital

Lmfao wimps like you should be fighting wars. It would end in a day.

That would take away his power source.

Jul TruSek He almost discovered the fact that the Alt Right is actually a _reaction_ to a coercive force acting on Western society. It was never a movement oriented towards imperialism; it was one meant to _preserve_ what made the West _what it is._ In our present day we are now losing all of that because of everyone else's goal to "diversify" (AKA deconstruct) everything here until Europe and North America become the same as every other place on the planet.

CAPITAL... Brilliant sir, thank you.

@rantandreason What exactly did he miss in your perspective?

CΔPITΔL If that is it, then the alt right is still wrong

He is recommending people actually stop and use intelligent thought instead of general party line views to form opinions about other people. He is suggesting that perhaps people on both sides of an issue might have some valid points worth listening to. He is effectively saying that both sides are part of the problem and until everyone stops echoing back the party line, nothing will ever change for the better. This is the problem, because most people don't want to step out of their comfortable little bubbles(on either side) and admit that maybe, just maybe, they could be wrong too. The answer usually sits somewhere in the middle, and so long as people get flack for conceding even a tiny little nothing point to their opposition, it's safer to stay on the edges than admit you can see points on both sides. Now, he shows a good amount of his bias in the way he talks about the people that he himself says had a point. But, at least he appears to be trying to understand the other side, and he appears to be interested in the exchange of views required to foster understanding and civility. For that, he has my respect. He also almost touches on the cause of these issues, but just doesn't quite seem to grasp it. History, Literature, study of the human condition, these are the "liberal arts" a.k.a. the Humanities. and until the I.Q.(science and math) stops ignoring the E.Q. the trend is just going to get worse.

Because it's about the alt-right. Go to any KZfaq video that doesn't sing the alt-right songs of praise and you'll see it's been massively down-voted.

+ComradeBroosk so true

because when he thought he was uncovering a lot of things, tariq changed his view sent him back to where he was

@@williammoore1917 except both sides are the problem

What did he do?

what?

Robert McDonnell “colorful”

Antifa are nothing but a bunch of string bean socialists with an entitlement complex. Any organized militia could shut them down for good in a few short weeks.

Go play some more quake lil white nationalist pussyfart.

Infinite up-votes

Hiding behind anonymity ITG "... It's called authoritarianism." No it's called not giving hate speech a platform.

"I want to have a serious debate" - 'Bernie Shekelstein'

I SO agree...it is depressing to see that...it`s like "you`re so right man, we should listen to each other, especially if we disagree...oh, wait no, not with THAT dude"...I was for once full of hope when I started to scroll down to see the beneficial effects of this speech on the community ! For once, people will discuss and it will be nice in a new wonderland ! Oh boy -_-

That's why the Nazis were annihilated. If you seek war, you will get your war. If you make unnecessary enemies because they look different, you will receive the consequence of your bigotry eventually.

Matt so what if so-called minorities ARE seeking a war then? At the very least, their race pimps are.

live by the sword....

It's exactly a prisoner's dilemma. And you know what works when there's a prisoner's dilemma? That those that does not cooperate get punished for it. But we don't have that in the current year. And the revolution ticks one day closer.

That's not what he meant

OngoingSky93 baah, humbug.

OngoingSky93 This is satire right?

This is leading us inevitably to civil conflict

OngoingSky93 Edit. I hate the division and Chaos. I hate feeling like I'm being forced to pick sides or judged for not being part of the right race. I wish he touched on culture and how, there are outside influences attacking culture to bring in their conflicting culture. Perhaps he only had a limited amount of time...

If you think what this guy is helping anything at all, you need to return to the former universe you came from.

Also a pretty standard technique for giving speeches, but when you want to find an issue with something, I guess you can always find one when you use that limited type of thinking i.e. I'm ok, other people aren't ok.

He did NOT say he was a 'positive influence' - he said that they may have the answers to some questions being asked. Also, he may not. But if you choose not to listen to whatever he has to say first, then you have no evidence with which to judge apart from that produced by your own bias. That's what I got from that anyway... but I guess we each colour the world according to the way we want to see it.

Yeah he found the worst people he could to try to understand a mass population...

Keep wanking at that in your alternative reality bubble

Nah they won't but I can sure rain on their parade

How is TEDx an echo chamber? I have seen some pretty diverse and controversial theories being floated there.

Ironically you missed the point. He admits that both sides live in echo chambers and invites progressives to try and understand the alt-right from their point of view. That was the whole reason for him going undercover.

yung yung, good point, but Tariq Nasheed. Lol

Ignorance same

Agreed.

It's something

Happy for you bro. The echo chambers on both side is truly dangerous, I'm of a liberal mind, with a sprinkle of conservatism, I follow everyone on and anyone on social media, from Shaun King to Ben Shapiro. I always have to check myself not to be in too much around people I agree with, even though it can be tedious, you know, some engage you in bad faith. But you have to keep challenging yourself.

What events changed your perspective? A lot of people are fairly entrenched in their respective sides and viewpoints. So it would be interesting to know how your perspective changed.

Andrew McLaren I know u might laugh or something but Jesus man. Had a radical encounter with Jesus, saw my ill friend get healed ( he was deaf and he heard and it was crazy) and man it just changed me. I truly believe if any hard core politic crazy person would find him like the country would be so much better man. I know I sound like I’m from a cult but I can’t explain it. Once you can actually think hey these are children, just like u and me. I am actually no better because I was born in a different family, it just changes your mindset aye He’s so real and he’s alive man and he loves you

Mide Songz yesh man I respect that so much

Andrew McLaren and believe me when I said I was Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder to the bone. Ready to debate anything. Had all my facts, but like so many others, definitely lacked compassion

Vegan patriot? That’s you isn’t it.

josue hermosillo I'm me; I don't know who you is.

I mean, your name tells me everything I need to know.

Something as simple as someone stating his own beliefs started an argument? Seriously??

I am my own God

Actually talking to your "enemy" is not a mainstream idea in the left(It's more so in the right but still far from mainstream), if it were then the idea of "Punching Nazis" wouldn't be such a widely supported thing. Whatever opinions he stated that rubbed anyone in this comment section the wrong way have no need to be brought up because they weren't the point of this, the point was encouraging Open Dialogue between both sides of an argument, and while I'll admit I was rather annoyed by him saying "Courageous" as if it were some holy act of crusades attempting to "show the alt-right the error of their ways" or as if simply talking to someone you don't agree with is some insane and blasphemous idea I do see how it could be necessary to say it in that way as he was probably speaking to a widely liberal audience and(As they've proven many times before) Modern liberals are prone to ignore you once you start saying things that stray too far from their view. So Maybe cut him some slack and understand that the point is not to bring you the "Answers" that they left holds but is instead to plead that the right and left work together to find those answers. As he said; Human beings all want the same things, and we have to go though each other to get these things. He's not saying you need to tear apart those against you or annex them into your opinions, he's saying you have to talk, with an open mind, maybe you have some answers for someone on the left, maybe someone on the left has some thoughts that you've never considered, maybe through that consideration and that dialogue you both can better yourself. And chances are you'll still leave as a lift and a right, but you'll be more grounded in your beliefs, you'll have more power in them. Here's hoping you, and a few others in this comment section who believed that he was trying to convert them to some liberal mindset, have chosen to read this and see it's meaning and hopefully that meaning sticks with you.

HAHAHA when he said 'he has the answers'... yeahhhhhh respect fell.

I lost him at, "I took a ... " ,

I was with him until that as well.

I'm glad that I'm a white guy that understand the world and not one of these "white identitarian" kids that can't listen to another person's perspective. Look at the message of the video and then look at how quickly these people instantly ignore that message. "He openly can't wait for the destruction of white people" I have a strong feeling that you're just misinterpreting like so many people constantly do to stay in their comfort bubble.

Vincent Sample - the problem is actually very simple. Straight white men are being told that they need to hate themselves for being white. Tariq Nasheed does that. Franny does that. Feminists to that. We are flying headlong into a world where the only acceptable bigotry is hatred of straight white Christian men. How about we have no bigotry

i agree. however teachers are payed way less than they should be (at least in primary school) because they are not just doing the job of teacher: they're social workers who might be the first contact a struggling family has with resources, or they're psychiatrists who have to deal with 200 kids or more in a year and can't spend the amount of quality time they need on kids who might get the lesson if they didn't have to worry about going home to abuse. i don't wanna beat you over the head, i just feel the same way that education needs to be improved

Read and Listen to some of John Taylor Gatto's books and talks and see whether that changes your mind on how much the existing system can be transformed... Its not the teachers its the system...its historical purposes and pathway has momentum and its effects are the societal pattern we are in to a significant degree. People have been trained for obedience.

Summondadrummin how do you feel about alternate education schemes than the current one? I definitely think that there are way more changes than just paying teachers more, like limiting class sizes to 10 kids or letting kids take charge of some lessons. And from experience i know that many adults learn from their children, so including some component of learning outside the classroom might be a great change. And get rid of homework and almost all tests. There are lots of little things wrong because schools are run like businesses

Luis...I know there are many experiments happening which is great... Have you seen the film called The Finland Phenomena? Apparently the Fins have some good insights. I myself would have liked a more outdoor education spending a majority of time exploring outside and a minority inside studying. John Taylor Gatto calls our school system "confinement schooling" and states that that alone is enough to make people feel alienated. Which makes sense. How did our ancestors learn? By being in their community not cordoned off from community.

Summondadrummin i havent seen the film but i do know that the scandanavian countries do have the best education systems around. I know that one of them doesnt have homework, and in almost all european countries the option of trade schools is offered free of cost so long as the student puts in the effort. I myself was a big reader, and often researched beyond what was offered in the classroom when i was fortunate to have a free period. Are there any other changes you would have liked to see? Im sure at the very least that going outside to learn would change a lot of minds for the better