Support me on Patreon: / deepfocuslensyoutube Watch A CLOCKWORK ORANGE: amzn.to/2Ygxoqh Follow me on twitter here: / deepfocuslens Like my Facebook page here: / deepfocuslens
Пікірлер: 388
@Icecoldswilla6 жыл бұрын
Making the protagonist a “evil person” was a very unique idea that some people can’t deal with. I love this film.
@lukess.s4 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't call it "very unique" since loads of films had done it by that point; except Clockwork is considerably more famous than most of those films
@leafsfan17284 жыл бұрын
"Your humble narrator." I love it whenever he says that. Lol
@plugshirt16843 жыл бұрын
Well the whole point of the movie is that evil is subjective and everyone in the movie is evil
@Freddy-Da-Freeloadah3 жыл бұрын
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picaresque_novel
@vegakvd3 жыл бұрын
Check out Sword of Doom if you like that concept, predates Clockwork by years but it’s really amazing.
@CARTOONIVERSE17 жыл бұрын
Great film. I first watched this when I was 12 years old. I was home alone & it came on TV at 3 AM in the morning. Afterwards I felt like I had been to an alternate Universe. I was hooked on films ever since.
@tae5237 жыл бұрын
CARTOONIVERSE1 Damn that must have fucked you up at 12
@CARTOONIVERSE16 жыл бұрын
Taedrem- Some folks think it did. It definitely turned my world upside-down.
@SamM-gl9zc5 жыл бұрын
Good thing it was 3am. In the morning. It's a real problem when shit goes down at 3am in the afternoon
@lukess.s4 жыл бұрын
@@SamM-gl9zc fuck you beat me to it
@SamM-gl9zc4 жыл бұрын
@@lukess.s - 🤣🤣
@BIGTENFanatic8 жыл бұрын
A masterpiece through and through. My favorite film of all time.
@aldriel8274 Жыл бұрын
It's not your favourite movie of all time. Why you always say that when you watch great movies reviews?
@movietimeateds697 жыл бұрын
stanley kubrick is the greatest director of all time
@MrMrjones3336 жыл бұрын
Joe I agree.
@HorrorKid101VampiresLive6 жыл бұрын
You're a man who knows what he's talking about!
@JRHasbro216 жыл бұрын
Tarkovsky was better.
@FirstPlace976 жыл бұрын
No
@joshuapage56895 жыл бұрын
just lynch..honorable mention for cronenberg
@MrNerdyBrit8 жыл бұрын
I don't get why you don't have a lot more views and subscribers. In my opinion you are one of the best and my favorite film reviewers on KZfaq. You're so well spoken, informative, and you give such well educated critique and are very objective. Please never stop reviewing films, I'll always be a fan of yours :)
@deepfocuslens8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I'm so glad to hear that. :)
@DenNEE4 жыл бұрын
Saw this film the first weekend it was released. On acid. It was rated "X" back then. Blew our tiny little minds. Great review!
@cormacrodgers4042 Жыл бұрын
On acid ? Jesus christ that was some laugh? 🙂
@DenNEE Жыл бұрын
@@cormacrodgers4042 We laughed like fools.
@Lotsofchai11 ай бұрын
Ok i want drugs right now lol
@deckofcards875 жыл бұрын
Not my favorite Kubrick film. But saying that.. if it was playing on tv I'd still drop everything to watch it...
@ejl4233 жыл бұрын
And with this brilliant review of a brilliant film, you have just earned my subscription. Yeah, I just finally caught this movie myself on Netflix about a week and a half ago and I'm still kicking myself for not seeing it sooner.
@DMichaelAtLarge6 жыл бұрын
A satire does not do in-depth character development. It has no intention of doing so. Its intent lies elsewhere. So there is nothing missing in this film. There is only your expectation of getting something that was never promised. This film is one of the most faithful adaptations of a novel I've seen. The book is equally devoid of deep character development--because it's not that kind of story!
@1970jasand7 жыл бұрын
This movie was definitely an experience, but like a Kubrick films, it always seems to take time for me to process them. It took 3 viewing of 2001 to finally appreciate it though I still don't fully understand it. It's hard for me to have an honest opinion on this film until I've seen it at least one more time and have time to think about it. My initial reaction after watching it was "it's ok" but the more I think about it i find it rather provocative and fascinating.
@deckofcards877 жыл бұрын
1970jasand Read the novels his film's are based upon. I find that helps a bit with understanding the basic concepts, especially Arthur Clarke's "The Sentinel" in conjuction with "2001." He did fill them with his own commentary however.
@kevinharkness21084 жыл бұрын
I think that a handfull of films are experiences rather than mere movies. A clockwork orange is one of them. Alien also comes to mind as does 1960s bond movies when first released. One of the reasons for this anomaly is that nothing like them had been seen before.
@plugshirt16843 жыл бұрын
I’m pretty sure there are two major themes of the movie that are somewhat connected. 1. Human nature can’t be changed which is showed by how the character goes through torture but still feels the same and when he returns to town his terrible friends don’t change they just became cops. 2. Morality is subjective which is shown by how almost every character in the movie is a selfish shitty person. It shows that it isn’t right to try and force someone to be a certain way when they are not because while the main character is evil everyone is just as hypocritical and wrong. To someone else every bad action these people commit is immoral while to someone else it would be okay to do so it isn’t okay to force your morality on people when it is subjective.
@rd92774 жыл бұрын
You are so articulate that I’m at a loss to add a thing. I’ve enjoyed your reviews for a few months now, but came upon this by chance. I’m in the fight with you. I didn’t enlist; I was conscripted by brain chemistry and who-knows-what. The more we are honest and open about depression the less it will be strange and taboo to ‘normal’ people. More importantly, the less it will be strange and taboo to us. You are amazing. Keep on. :-)
@phnigra1113 жыл бұрын
Great review. You made me remember how much I respect this film (even though I’ve seen it so many times, I’m kinda over it) but it’s still a masterpiece & I believe it holds up to the test of time..
@cruddddddddddddddd4 жыл бұрын
The story is, of course, a warning to society in the vein of Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four. Nationwide social credit scores that countries like China are currently practicing doesn't seem that far from forcing a false morality onto people. I think the statement this story makes can get lost beneath Kubrick's (brilliant) stylization, which probably makes the book more successful in that regard. I do feel like Alex is a little more complex than you give him credit for. He is very cultured, with a deep love for classical music, which isn't a trait one would imagine in a street-gang hoodlum. This makes his character a bit of a contradiction. The reason his droogs betray him is because Alex admonishes them for being rude to a woman singing opera in the milk bar. Kubrick's choice to play classical music over scenes of violence was meant to show this contradiction in Alex's character: his cultured side vs. his apparent urges to commit (ultra) violent acts.
@MyKetogenicLife8 жыл бұрын
I am a Kubrick nut! thanks for this review. Paths of Glory is my favorite. Still on the edge of my seat for your thoughts on Scorsese's After Hours.
@Markterrycameron7 жыл бұрын
It was a christian that stood against the treatment.
@elichaitman32943 жыл бұрын
If you're talking about Kubrick, he was Jewish
@pasticheit96773 жыл бұрын
How daft can you get?
@chickenflavor98803 жыл бұрын
@@elichaitman3294 the priest.
@jeffreyjeziorski3414 жыл бұрын
I respect your reviews. Now that Roger Ebert is gone, it seems like you are the one to embody that combination of inciteful love and frustration of the movies that he did. Very articulate reviewer. Keep up the good work!
@balboa938 жыл бұрын
Great review! I'm glad that you actually respond to your fans on twitter btw. Seeing a new video of yours really makes my day. But I already told you this on twitter haha
@deepfocuslens8 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Yeah it's pretty easy for me to respond to viewers because I don't have that many. hahaha :)
@Mr062619845 жыл бұрын
what are your top 40 films in order from fav to least fav
@markpawziuk14495 жыл бұрын
ACO is a movie I watch less frequently as I get older, but as an undeniable Kubrick-Aid drinker, I cannot deny its enduring value. The last time I watched it was during the Kubrick Exhibit in Toronto. The print looked brand-new and it was a spectacular experience!
@DD-zu9fy3 жыл бұрын
love your analysis, this one was especially good. doesn't have a ton in common with A Clockwork Orange, but watching it again I was thinking of the film "Re-Animator"? I'd love to hear your thoughts. Jeffrey Combs is brilliant, Stuart Gordon captures and holds on so well the balance of hilarious and gore
@Ironballs698 жыл бұрын
Great review. The one disappointment I always have with this film, which is especially unusual for a Kubrick film, is some of the sets really seem to date the film. Alex's house in particular really seems to be stuck in the era that the film was made in rather than the near future I suppose the film is supposed to be set in.
@ZacGibsonMusic8 жыл бұрын
It's funny that you're reviewing this movie, because I just saw it the other day. Even having read the book a few years ago, I found this film to be difficult to parse, and I think that's because it's so thematically dense. There is the whole issue of art and violence, like you mentioned, but I feel there is also some political commentary in there with the governor trying to use Alex whenever possible to leverage his own public image. There is also the question of free will, and whether it's better to choose evil than to be good against your will. But what I really appreciated was Kubrick's stylistic mastery. All the sets and shots were great and gave the film a unique feel, and because the story is told from Alex's point of view, we are forced to see his perverse actions as being somehow triumphant, which makes it even more disturbing. I think it's definitely a great film and one that demands multiple viewings.
@hansolzy6 жыл бұрын
well said. great review!
@frankchukwumah94772 жыл бұрын
Every main character in Kubrick films goes through a journey of change.
@kabilanviswanathan42013 жыл бұрын
Please tell how to download it , I had swarched a lot . But I cant download it . 🥺🥺💔💔💔
@623professormartino7 жыл бұрын
Hey enjoyed the review. Kubrick uses a speech called Nadsat during the film. The term "droog" is one of the words derived from the speech. I believe it means friends or fellow gang members, not the name of his gang. I liked the way you described his use of the steady can and how it gave the viewer that helpless perspective. Good job overall love, take care.
@guymorris19636 жыл бұрын
Nick Martin Didn't Kubrik have to get someone to create the Nadsat language so it could be used in this movie.
@XCVIII18 жыл бұрын
"I Was Cured Alright!!" Great ending, great film...After seeing The Neon Demon I'm almost certain Kubrick is NWR's favorite director
@mrazcr0007 жыл бұрын
I didn't need lid locks to watch this vid. Great job on the review. How about an Eyes Wide Shut review?
@cardelspews86968 жыл бұрын
Thank You! Felt very similar when watching the film. I really enjoy the first half it's very stylish/meditative in a sense, especially it's dialogue and use of the Nadsat "slanguage". But, I found the last half kind of shallow as well and it lost me with making Alex a sympathetic character and its political message. I recently watched it again a few months ago after listening to Bowie's "Blackstar" and finding out the lyrics for the song "Girl Loves Me" were heavily influenced by the book/film. Great review/channel been watching for the past year or so, might as well subscribe at this point haha.
@CiprianHanga7 жыл бұрын
Wait, why is the image flipped?
@nikhilkumar23616 жыл бұрын
Nice review. How much would you rate it out of 10?
@StanSwan3 жыл бұрын
Came here wondering what such a beautiful young lady had to say about Clockwork Orange. Even more taken with her knowledge of the film. I was 17 when I first saw the film, a powerless finding your way stage of your life for a guy. I was 17 in 1986 and was sneaking Jimi Hendrix records into my bedroom because white kids did not have black artists records unless it was Mike Jackson. The film had less meaning to me then, the opposite of her review. It was being able to be an adult and be exposed to things I was sheltered from as a kid. It did not make me want to kill or rape anyone, that was for the fake movies. We wanted to get some beers, a bottle, meet some girls, and maybe trash a hotel room from time to time? None of us confused movie fantasy with reality the shock value was Hollywood not New England USA where I attended Catholic schools that took class trips to visit the sites of witch burnings. Remember being at a house party with a girl I made out with. She passed out from drinking too much in her bedroom and we closed the door to let her sleep. We did take the swords hung on the wall and play Zoro with the houseplants. It was a fun free time and CO was a lot like the MTV Jackass show or the old VHS tapes of "Faces of the Dead" we all watched. No movie is going to change who you are. It is like Tipper Gore in Congress saying Twisted Sister made kids be 6 foot 7 and dress up as crazy rocking women. I do find American women hate the film on the whole. I had a long term relationship with a girl from Canada that loved the film.
@khkartc Жыл бұрын
“Alex” reminds me more of “Zed” in _Pulp Fiction,_ someone who thinks he’s a Class-A badass, but who eventually would stumble-or would have stumbled-onto a whole level of badassery he had no idea existed. I had similar impressions about both characters and rooted for them to get their comeuppance.
@teknramus1594 жыл бұрын
fascinating to find out that people actually recognized what it was, n appreciate. my observation was that most either loved or hated while completely missing the message
@jedicid6 жыл бұрын
I love watching your film analysis.
@EduardoERivolta8 жыл бұрын
I think u were orange because of Netherlands (????). Lol i love this movie, is one of my favourites, i have seen it more than 250 times and i never get tired of it. One of my favourites. Greetings from Argentina, Maggie!!! Glad u are fine!!!
@angiehazelaar3 жыл бұрын
This is my favourite film ever! Great review
@thscottishwarrior27617 күн бұрын
We've seen villains presented as the main protagonist in Olivier's RICHARD III, SCARFACE, and other movies. The key is to make them interesting, charming, funny, or relatable in some way.
@Guigley3 жыл бұрын
I don't worship this film as others do, but it has moments of absolute cinematic mastery.
@martyjewell56836 жыл бұрын
I saw this flick in the theater when released in 1971 (I was 20 years old) I found it profound in it's graphic sex and violence but found the music to be the most compelling in any movie thus far. Awesome soundtrack. Pre digital, computer and "high" tech shit, this movie delivered. Still one of my favorites. Little girl, you try waaaaay to hard to dissect/explain this film. As we used to say in the 70's... just dig it..
@phealy023 жыл бұрын
...or you lack the intellect to comprehend anything other than the surface visuals?
@martyjewell56833 жыл бұрын
@@phealy02, valid point. Are you prejudiced against "surface visuals"?? Besides, dude, I like what I like.
@paulw858 Жыл бұрын
"Little girl." What the fuck is this misogyny... Seems like you learned a little too much from the themes of this movie. How unnecessary and reductive.
@samghost133 жыл бұрын
Ola I am Mindblown by yours! You did a great job and you had some cool things that i never thought about. Thank you Miss deepfcls
@CrassusCazius4 жыл бұрын
“It’s a part of the entertainment that criticizes the culture” Very astute observation. It’s a film that criticizes violence and corruption while being a product of the same system.
@AvantTom5 жыл бұрын
This is the only KZfaq annalyis of this film I've seen that actually gets it. Nobody else understands the reflexive, self referential points about this film.
@theolamp53125 жыл бұрын
I saw this as a teenager. I was not ready for it. Even now at the age of 68, I'm not sure I want to see it again. Still, my favorite Kubrick films are Dr. Strangelove and Paths of Glory. I love great B&W cinematography. I even recall such films as In Cold Blood & Manhattan that made such great use of B&W. I wish that in future years that we will see that other studios will accept B&W as a medium with true purpose.
@johnreremoana95646 жыл бұрын
That movie was a real buzz to watch on 'The Big Screen', that movie was a must watch at the cinemas, just to really get the full story of this 'Kubrick' classic and British actor 'Malcolm McDowell' performance is a superb genius, will be very well memorable for this movie (besides from 'Caligula').
@grasshopperfiddler3 жыл бұрын
I Love you for not spoiling your review by issueing a spoiler alert
@markthompson5746 Жыл бұрын
Very cogent analysis. Well done.
@buzzcrushtrendkill3 жыл бұрын
The dialogue is what I come back for in this film.
@davydevilution72978 жыл бұрын
Check out A Clockwork Orange - Renegade Cut.
@subhumantype5 жыл бұрын
Awesome review! I agree with everything you said.
@UtarkOyun4 жыл бұрын
Good review. I am trying to improve my english and also trying to learn criticism so thanks...
@peihualiu26867 жыл бұрын
Great literary analysis!
@pjbrubak3 жыл бұрын
I don't know if she wants to do it, but I would love to see her commentary on The Criterion Channel.
@tamerlanmerifeti18048 жыл бұрын
subscribed.waiting more stanley analysis :)
@techsyndrome32912 жыл бұрын
Even though i despise clockwork orange , i come back to it once a while to witness this post dystopian world, which is a concept i truly liked and the way it is portrayed in the film
@felixleiter254 жыл бұрын
I would like to hear your take on Lina Wertmuller's Seven Beauties. Have you ever seen it?
@TMxtt2 жыл бұрын
I'm a big fan of Clockwork Orange. Growing up in Britain I didn't actually get to see it until after Kubrick passed away as he had had the film taken out of circulation in the UK due to multiple copycat incidents influenced by it. Still such a visually unique and, at times, funny film imo, much like the book. Some of the invented words by Burgess are very amusing! The twat who ends up lodging in Alex's old bedroom and the scene when Alex meets him after getting out of prison, always makes me smile. One of the many scenes that look like some Government information film from the '50s (which HAS to have been an aesthetic influence on Kubrick), yet ofc Kubrick charges it with so much humour and the dialogue is just of a superior quality altogether. Btw is that the sound of breaking waves in the background?
@davidsakamoto93533 жыл бұрын
The movie should have added the scene from the novel where Alex after being kicked out by his parents looking up ways to commit suicide. I feel like that would have added to the sympathetic or pathos we needed to feel for Alex.
@lichtfilme8 жыл бұрын
Another proof that Kubrick made this film be self aware of being a production is the 2001-soundtrack record we can see in the record store- this almost breaks the 4th wall
@ericsperry49815 жыл бұрын
In addition to Kubrick being in the background in that scene.
@ABCDyeahyeahyeah8 жыл бұрын
The story was a satirical diss towards BF Skinner and his ilk
@theprousteffect9717 Жыл бұрын
Sorry to comment on an old video, but this movie reminds me a little of another that I'd love to see you review: Irréversible, with Monica Bellucci and Vincent Cassel.
@NateStapleton7 жыл бұрын
Eyes Wide Shut is my favorite Kubrick. I would love to hear your thoughts on that film as I feel it is his greatest, all of the symbolism and commentary on relationships, wealth, etc
@deepfocuslens7 жыл бұрын
I like it too. I've thought about reviewing that. Hopefully soon.
@travisgray83762 жыл бұрын
I love that film too it's a masterpiece but a clockwork Orange is my favourite but eyes wide shut is up there probably my favourite after this
@aldriel8274 Жыл бұрын
Great piece of cinematographic work. Belongs to my Top 30 ever.
@peterpellechia59854 жыл бұрын
Dont know if i love it but it is pure genius.no ither film like it.it reaches out and grabs your attention without a doubt
@cristobalv4 жыл бұрын
Are you close to the sea ? there is a weird background noise. Great Review i love your voice.
@kthx11384 жыл бұрын
I always look at Clockwork as a way to live cathartically through a sadistic homicidal madman--"harming" people without actually harming people. It's quite liberating actually.
@zanerobbins37942 жыл бұрын
Tf do you mean without harming people?
@patricktaylor27336 жыл бұрын
There's nothing missing at all in the film for me. I thought that Alex was as deep and complex a character as he really needed to be and he is certainly more interesting and complex than any of the other characters in the story. The film, much like the equally brilliant novel, is a very stark, cold, vivid and darkly satirical fable that doesn't really concern itself with any in-depth character development and i think it's one of the most truly masterful film adaptations of a novel that's ever been made. I think it's unquestionably a cinematic masterpiece and it's my personal favorite Kubrick film. It's one of just a mere handful of films that i consider to be genuinely perfect in every aspect.
@anthonyhauser30636 жыл бұрын
Love the dress 👌🏻 great movie review
@williamsherman10894 жыл бұрын
Good review!
@nigelfuentes57637 жыл бұрын
This is my second favorite movie and I'm 13 and I saw it when I was 12 and I still loved it
@gamerontheline79447 жыл бұрын
Nigel Fuentes because it had boobs? xD jk I love the movie to. it has a really good plot and a good story
@kristine83385 жыл бұрын
@Nigel you are to young to watch this movie.
@Ray-zq6se3 жыл бұрын
Your dress is so bright it first looked red too me 😂😂
@kw1ksh0t10 ай бұрын
I love how the film portrays behavioural control and societal conditioning as somehow even more evil and undesirable than rape and murder to the point that by the end of the film we are somehow rooting for the main character to resume his evil ways and rejoicing when he does.
@saulorocha37556 жыл бұрын
Why all your videos are shot with the image in reverse, mirrored. It doesn't matter, you still look great! Nice review. PS: Hey, you are dressed like the character Mrs. Alexander so would you like to..."No time for the old in-out, love. I just came to read the meter."
@McLarenMercedes8 жыл бұрын
Your dress looks more red to me. I think Malcolm McDowell is forever typecast as a villain thanks to A Clockwork Orange. Can't recall him ever playing a sympathetic character. Wendy Carlos (then still Walter Carlos) is one of the most important pioneers of electronic synthesizer music. Her debut album "Switched on Bach" from 1968 was the first electronic album to be sold over a million. Back then you had to be a studio musician to handle the huge analogue synthesizers and it was an age of innovation. Prior to her the genre was very avantgarde and for "art people" but she made it more mainstream. Sorry for getting carried away like this but it's a music style I quite like (though I'm not bound to any specific genres). She (Carlos) composed a lot of music for ACO but Kubrick ended up using just some pieces. The complete original soundtrack/score was one of the first film scores I purchased on CD. Wendy Carlos worked again with Stanley Kubrick for The Shining. Again just part of her composed score was used. The sexually objectified women furnitures were inspired by artist Allen Jones's sculptures but he actually turned down Kubrick's offer to design them himself. A fact most get wrong. For those interested in architecture A Clockwork Orange is full of brutalist buildings, something which I personally believe enhances the image of the future dystopia. It's a much maligned style but suits the atmosphere Kubrick was intended to portray. Kubrick's great attention to detail is also evident. Alex's Reference Hydraulic Transcription Turntable is a treasured classic for audiophiles and it has been displayed in the Museum of Modern Art in NY. The mini-cassette he uses to play the Beethoven's 9th symphony was a brand new format at the time but consumers (99% of those watching the film) never adopted it. All these details add up and elevates the movie. That's the great thing about Kubrick, he never made the same film twice. He also explored pretty much all the genres, including comedy with the brilliant Dr.Strangelove. Like you say every single film of his is a genre of its own. It's a pity so many modern day film makers - which I won't name not to offend their disturbingly fanatical fans - have a very formulaic way of making films. I'll also have to agree that ACO is flawed. After purchasing the Kubrick collection I watched all the movies again and A Clockwork Orange is sort of a number of great scenes with a narrative that is lacking compared to his other films. What bothered me above all is how the minister of interior remains a mysterious figure with an unknown agenda. I assume he wanted Alex as the ideal test subject for the Ludovico technique given his violent past. If somebody like Alex could be neutralized (and also completely helpless as it turns out) then ordinary people could be conditioned to be obedient and subservient to the government in charge. Alex has become a pawn in a greater political game but that's merely hinted in the film as we see it almost completely from Alex's perspective. After Alex has his suicide attempt the minister of interior does everything to cover the whole thing up and becomes Alex's "friend" by offering him a job and a nice hi-fi system as a token of his appreciation. He's the real villain, not Alex. I read the novel before seeing the film itself and the ending was a minor disappointment. In hindsight I think the movie ends better. In Burgess's novel Alex eventually grows out of his violent loving lifestyle which I find ridiculous. Somebody like him would always remain psychotic with a taste for rape and violence one way or another. It's integral to who he is. Kubrick's ending in which Alex goes back to being the person he always was resonates a lot better with me. Burgess himself wasn't happy with how the movie ended but I'm grateful Kubrick made the necessary changes. Last of all. It's easy for me to understand what Alex and his droogs (means friends) are saying. Their nadsat slang language is based on slavic languages and since I speak one of them (they're similar) there are no ambiguous interpretations. You made a great review. Some things never occurred to me but it's all a matter of perception isn't it? Like what looks orange and red in people's eyes.
@MirrorDomains8 жыл бұрын
This is my second favorite Kubrick film! It is a great watch!
@rakariwilliams3 жыл бұрын
What's your first favorite?
@MirrorDomains3 жыл бұрын
@@rakariwilliams The Shinning
@rakariwilliams3 жыл бұрын
@@MirrorDomains Nice. Mine's 2001 A Space Odyssey
@MirrorDomains3 жыл бұрын
@@rakariwilliams Epic ending!
@ItsKarenVega3 жыл бұрын
I might be biased because I love the book by Anthony Burgess so much but I found myself enjoying this movie more as I got older. I saw it first when I was about 19 or so and I was blown away by it, but after watching it more than once over the years, I found I had more reasons, and better reasons, for loving it the way I did. The establishment of Alex as a character who is evil simply by his nature, not due to stimuli around him that made him like that but rather just the way he was born, nature and not nurture, he enjoys hurting people and being a violent psychotic sexual deviant, and then his experiences of being "deprogrammed" by the Ludovico technique, really presses the question of what to do with a person who is genuinely evil. Do you kill them? Do you imprison them for life? Do you exile them? In this case, do you forcefully pacify them into being nonviolent? And if you do, is it morally justified to revoke someone's free will for the safety of society? It's also why I absolutely love that Kubrick decided to leave off the final chapter in which Alex encounters Pete, the fourth and least important of his droogs, years later as an adult and makes the decision on his own accord to stop being "ultra-violent."
@timm53624 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: the guy with the dumb bells at the old man's house towards the end went on to play Darth Vader.
@anthonyscully2998 Жыл бұрын
When filmmakers talk about Kubrick they usually talk about technical matters such as tracking shots. They rarely talk about story or character
@inchaoswetrust6 жыл бұрын
One of the 2 best films 🎥 ever made...together with “2001 a space odyssey “
@philipmcritchie73092 жыл бұрын
God this girl ages so damn well.
@ethanwimsett2 жыл бұрын
Society too incompetent to discipline a talented young man & resents him with self righteousness. Masquerading their own evil impulses. Of course I despise Alex's actions, but respect that he isn't a phony.
@lamegoldfish67366 жыл бұрын
With 'Clockwork Orange' I think ugly, and unsettling can be good. Kubrick has always been one of my favorites.
@jmastercha6 жыл бұрын
siterical? what does this MEAN!! ... now i have to pause it and look it up
@CaterpillarMaki3 жыл бұрын
All around an excellent review but I gotta correct you on one thing. The gang is not named "the Droogs". Alex uses the word "droog" to mean friend or buddy. It's based upon the Russian word _друг_ which is pronounced as "droog" and translates to "friend." The scene in the derelict casino shows this, when Alex refers to encountering "Billy Boy and his four droogs."
@greenstreetelite71077 жыл бұрын
Anthony burgess is the first and main writer not who u said but decent review tho imo
@brandonkashinsky9222 Жыл бұрын
He’s my favorite film director, but I’ve only seen 2001: a space odyssey
@johnkennethwiseman6822 жыл бұрын
a brilliant film. excellent review.
@kulafachi95716 жыл бұрын
Watch the movie then read the book. The book is 1,000 times darker I love em both
@paristexas803 жыл бұрын
just how good is Kubrick? so many classics. Full Metal.. 2001, Shining, Dr Strangelove, Lolita, Barry Lyndon, Paths, even Spartacus 🎥🎬😍
@percym.v.rodriguez77658 жыл бұрын
Don't you think that the sublimation of violence it works just for the violence and not for the sublimation in certain moments of the movie?
@deepfocuslens8 жыл бұрын
I think it goes both ways. It works as a commentary, but part of the appeal of the film is that it consciously surrenders itself to the violence and sexuality that it is criticizing.
@ColonelFredPuntridge Жыл бұрын
Test your cinema and music IQ! by answering this question without looking it up: Which composer composed more of the music you hear in this movie than any other? 1. Ludwig van Beethoven 2. Henry Purcell 3. Edward Elgar 4. Gioachino Rossini
@derekroberts66544 жыл бұрын
After seeing “Dr. Sleep” I began to wonder if there could be anymore sequels to Kubrick films. So far there has been 2. Kubrick directed his films in such a way where you thought there could never be a sequel even though 1984s “2010: The Year We Make Contact” was the exception because it was more or less meant to be a movie saga (that has yet to be finished but that’s another topic) but the rest, i wouldn’t think there would be....until “Dr. Sleep” and then I found THIS: www.looper.com/152530/the-truth-behind-the-clockwork-orange-sequel/
@jeffreytaylor62577 жыл бұрын
Camera cold and still? He threw a camera out the window. You are very observant but I think you miss some things about what he is doing and saying.
@deepfocuslens7 жыл бұрын
Kubrick has a very cold tone and style overall. That doesn't mean he's that way all the time. There are certainly moments in Clockwork that feel very visceral. I'm just making a point about the overall effect.
@ArnoGoldfinger6 жыл бұрын
Jeffrey: didn't realise that obvious now and of course I know which scene you're talking about. Thanks.
@christophermacintyre58905 жыл бұрын
Kubrick was the uncredited director of the opening credits to SCTV...a little known fact.
@jameslisle77757 жыл бұрын
That review was real horrorshow :)
@Caleb-lu3zl7 жыл бұрын
Nice review! This movie should be next to "black comedy" in the dictionary If that makes sense
@dannypomfret16 жыл бұрын
I think your getting a bit lost on this one? Oh by the way Anthony Burgess wrote the Book?
@takayasu20094 жыл бұрын
A nice piece of orange outfit.
@whalewatchersa5 жыл бұрын
Lacking the satirical bite of Strangelove, but stylistically marvellous. Nowhere near as good as Burgess' original novel, though, which truly is a masterpiece. Even Kubrick couldn't distill the strange energy it contains.
@nicholasjanke34768 ай бұрын
The film made a Malcolm Mcdowell a science fiction star.
@moz77772 жыл бұрын
Top 10 films ive ever seen. Kubrick has 3 of those.