Right? I bet they were offered the purchase of the land when it was on sale and they declined because, hey, why pay for something when they can force use of it for free? And are outraged when the new owner doesn’t want them to use it? Pieces of work.

Judge kind of settled that though by ruling in the owners favour and I'm thinking that it will have to be disclosed during any sale process. But who would want such neighbours, that's going to be a problem for her selling.

The survey still exist and the defendants can be charged with trespassing if they build anything else over the survey line.

Agreed

*self-entitled. "Entitled" means you really are owed something (ie "you're entitled to compensation") "self-entitled" means only you think you are owed something.

She will never ever have peace on that property, they are going to make it a living hell for her... she should buy a new property where she can enjoy her life in peace without people like that.

@@kristineo2926 you are probably right. Who wants to keep going to court and live like that!! Neighbor isn’t going to change. It’s a shame though.

A Karen

@@Akgolf1234 Trashy too.

They're roaches and should be treated as such

they had an agreement with the previous owner for many years and nothing was put in writing as to what would change if the property was ever sold . this judge may have been over her head on this verdict because the defendants can still appeal this decision and continue to use the property under the adverse possession laws which are basically a type of squatters rights , and they can still tie this up in court . thats why the plaintiff said she was gonna end up selling the property .

@@marleonetti7 Did you not listen to what the judge said? Adverse possession must be hostile, i.e. contrary to the owner's rights AND without permission. They had the consent of the previous owner to use that part of the property, so it by definition cannot be adverse possession.

@@cowgirlbebop14 well i looked up several sources regarding the definition of adverse possession and none of them defined or described it as hostile . it is a very old law that basically states that if a person or persons have been occupying property for a long period of time and treating it as if they were the owners without the owners consent to ALL that they were doing on and with the property then they can have a legal claim to the property if the owner for all those years never protests . which is EXACTLY what happened so why is this judge not understanding the law ?

They were renters and angry that the owner was through with them and pissed at the neighbor for calling on their trespass on her property. Encroaching someone's property is against the law. They though the plaintiff has no right to her acreage. She pays the taxes; it is her property. The defendants were out of line.

Actually by law after 10 years it becomes your land if they didn’t take action against you

​@@melissaomalia9870well actually according to their state's law, this isn't true and exactly what the law states was explained to them.

@@melissaomalia9870you are wrong. First, even some counties differ in length of time. But there’s a whole lot more needed for it, did you even listen to what the judge said?

Exactly, agree 💯 % !!

👍💯🤣🤣🤣💗

I %100 believe that was untrue. Defendants were caught lying about other things

Ummmm whats wrong if she did?????????

If I'd spent any amount of money on any size if land, it's mine. These people were encroaching 30 feet. THIRTY FEET. They have an acre. That should be enough room for anything they need. Put the chicken coop on your own property. Just because the prior owner was a pushover, doesn't mean new owner is. Why are the Defendant's acting like the Plaintiff is wrong for wanting THEIR things off her property. They seem like the type to complain to all the neighbors as well. Trying to turn them against the new owner.

And no way would I allow them to chase me off of my land That I legally own. I don't think that she should sell , They need to stay off her land or Get charged every time they don't. If I was her I would put up a fence And get cameras.

well not so fast , adverse possession is a bit more complicated then this judge is telling us because its basically a form of squaters rights . and if the defendants had an agreement with the previous owner and no stipulation was given in writing as to what would change in the event that the property was sold then the defendants can still have a case with another judge if they appeal . that may be a big reason as to why the new owner is selling the property .

These ppl are probably the reason the last land owners sold their property. They didn't want to deal with this a**holes encroaching and bullying. She has a right to peaceful enjoyment of her property and she doesn't have that. It's not worth staying if you are miserable in your own home

@@marleonetti7 The new owner had a survey done and put up no trespassing signs. ITs her property.

Indeed 👍 The squatters concocted a fable @ their young son “bullied” by the neighbor they despise…their fable aimed at a former CPS investigator!! 💀🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

It took me way too long to find this comment 😂😂😂I’m like wtf is wrong with my AirPods now

The reverb reminds me of recorded vocals in several ‘80s songs. 😉

Hahaha i thought it was me 😂 glad im not the only one...😂

Listen by wearing earphones on only one ear in ,it sounds good. It sounds bad when both ears are in, due to bad audio mixing.

I was trying to fix my headphones lol

Overentitled Gen Z dork or Millennial or even Gen X'er that doesn't remember how life was like just 20 years ago WITHOUT all this free and on demand content? Stop your b*tching.

Opinions vary.

@@kennethbaker5223 how?

Nope That's what surveys are for. If your stuff is on MY land...it's getting thrown out. I paid for that land and you have no right to it.

But why? She bought it and wanted her land

@@yung1717 oh I was agreeing with you...just read it too fast 🙃

I mean they’re not wrong that if you use land and the owner doesn’t stop it then it can be a problem for the owner. Judge Judy has talked about it before, and when she bought a house she asked the neighbors to sign that she owned this portion of property or she’d build a fence. They didn’t sign so she build a fence right through what they were using as their front yard, so JJ could ensure there was no issue with rights later

I remember that episode. JJ don't fk around. 🤣

She didn't. She sold it for a few million and retired to Florida

Yep cause then they gotta pay the extra taxes.

Jealousy/Envy

Always. The dumbest people. Hopefully it's scripted or they're trolling.

@@mickm6309 You’re implying the other commenter is jealous of the tourists with Harvey? Okaaaaay💗👍🤣🤣🤣🤣

I noticed that in most cases. I think they don't actually watch the episodes.

@carriepriegel6477 i was implying how a lot of people are never happy with what they have and want what their neighbours have.

I know!!! WTH??

I thought it was my earbuds🤣

I just bought a home...I guess the neighbors have moved the stakes before...so I need to get on it 🤦🏼‍♀️

@@mandylynnhoff Absolutely! And go ahead and let them move the wooden stakes. Let them waste their time! There should be metal pins in all 4 corners of your property (usually rebar but older properties have used any metal they had on hand, even found a tractor axel used for a corner pin once 🤣). So the important thing is to know where the pins are, cause that are MUCH harder to pull out. Have your surveyor mark those up when he adds the wooden stakes so it’s easier for you to see. Walk the boundary line with him and have him show you all the corners and pins so you know where they all are. And it might cost extra, but if any pins are missing…definitely pay to have it replaced. Those pins are very important. And ask the Surveyor to “flag the line” on the side of the problem neighbor. He or she will put pieces of survey tape or little flags or even a piece of string down the property line….and then take a PICTURE so you have evidence of where that line was in case you need to go to court. Good luck! The Courts side with the survey 99.999% of the time so it’s great ammo to have!

Fence and cameras!

More $$$$

Electric fence, with cameras.. trail cams are not too expensive. That's called evidence. Sue their arse off until they realized its not their property. Stay in their lane.

🤣😂liar, lawyer, same thing.... 😉😂

@@kristic4472😂😂😂

Yep. They want the benefit but none of the taxes or liability.

Oh, good. I wasn't going crazy about the audio. Lol

😄

Bully was the nicest word I could say

C U Next Tuesday

Sounds like there's a slight mis-synchronization between the left and right channels.

You couldn’t be more correct.

I’m wondering too. Sounds like the mic went off and they used the actual sound in the court room

Most land owners are not this entitled and respect land rights and surveys. If you do have a problem like this..contact authorities and keep a record of any time they come over. They can be arrested for tresspas.

Nothing is wrong with it.

I had a neighbor who put thistle seeds in another neighbors newly mulched gardens. People can be such jerks

🤣👍🏾 Perfect!

The land was sold.

U mean staring down the "defendant" ?

@@QS0924 😐 no… I meant what I wrote the wife ( aka the defendant) is staring down the plaintiff…. Where is the confusion for you?

It would depend on where exactly they are but in most cases you can just pay for a new marking (pins/stakes) based on the survey she still had. Much cheaper than paying for a new survey.