A16 vs A15 Bionic TESTED: Apple is HIDING something...

  Рет қаралды 118,586

Luke Miani

Luke Miani

Жыл бұрын

Thanks to TORRAS for sponsoring, check out some of their cases!
Shop TORRAS iPhone 14 Guardian: amzn.to/3DDGfZJ
Shop TORRAS iPhone 14 Guardian MagSafe: amzn.to/3eRI5vt
Shop TORRAS iPhone 14 OriginFit: amzn.to/3dvsAZZ
Shop TORRAS iPhone 14 Diamond Clear: amzn.to/3BThLdq
Shop TORRAS iPhone 14 Upro Matte:amzn.to/3BqT1Ih
With the new iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max, Apple has introduced the A16 Bionic Apple Silicon chip, which is built on a new TSMC 4nm process. Apple didn't reveal too many details about the chip, even comparing it to 2019's A13 Bionic. So today what I want to find out is what kind of A16 Performance we can expect, what the A16 vs A15 looks like, and what this new process means for M2 Pro, M3, or even M4 Apple Silicon!
Follow me on Twitter: / lukemiani
Follow me on Twitch: / lukemiani
Join my Subreddit! / lukemianiyoutube
Gear:
iFixit Pro Toolkit: amzn.to/3bYIzdM
Panasonic Lumix GH5: amzn.to/3b3oMtj
Leica 12-60MM Lens: amzn.to/3hQ5URf
Sennheiser MKH 416: amzn.to/31zGwt2
Zoom H6: amzn.to/2ECYSk6
Sennheiser MKE 440: amzn.to/2JRwIRU
Edelkrone SliderOne V2: amzn.to/33mTZmt
Amazon Links are affiliate codes and generate small commission to support the channel

Пікірлер: 448
@Greenie214
@Greenie214 Жыл бұрын
4nm is more branding than anything else. It’s frankly an optimised version of N5P, which was an optimised version of the original 5nm from TSMC. The “real” node changes will come with 3nm which should see a noticeable perf/watt bump across the board
@Ronin-fr1wm
@Ronin-fr1wm Жыл бұрын
2nm
@PWingert1966
@PWingert1966 Жыл бұрын
Shrinking down to 2nm will be exponentially more difficult and I think the 1nm is a square of the cube of the hypercube level of difficulty so die shrink will not continue to improve the performance for much longer. I think we will end up with a fast enough situation. Where we end up is in small incremental changes until the next great revolution in chip making in maybe 10 years time. We are yet again approaching a wall and we will make contact with it soon. Objects in extreme UV laser lenses may appear farther then they are..😁😁
@genxtechguy
@genxtechguy Жыл бұрын
0.5nm is going to bring the big changes .. just hold out until then … 🙂
@zenbum2654
@zenbum2654 Жыл бұрын
I'm holding out until "picometers" becomes a common term.
@yungxswiss8824
@yungxswiss8824 Жыл бұрын
@@genxtechguy just wait till 0.25 nanometer that’s gonna be the real change
@eggshi
@eggshi Жыл бұрын
I think we have reached a point on the iPhone and iPad where we have topped out the performance needed in a chip that the device/software can even take advantage of. Like the A16 in iPhone and M1 in the iPad will be all anyone needs for years, where a new chip won't even make a difference in day-to-day day usage, even in high-performance use cases for those devices for a long time. Thoughts?
@lukemiani
@lukemiani Жыл бұрын
Yeah I don’t even know what I would do with more performance tbh
@RipperDoc97
@RipperDoc97 Жыл бұрын
@@lukemiani Marketing🤭😁
@ronthorn3
@ronthorn3 Жыл бұрын
IMO it’s all about more battery life, that can always be better.
@AppleReviews
@AppleReviews Жыл бұрын
@@lukemiani Better tell me if iPhone 14s have Noise Cancelling in Phone Calls as in 13s Apple disabled this feature
@zenbum2654
@zenbum2654 Жыл бұрын
I'm old enough to remember Bill Gates saying that 640 kB was all the memory a PC would ever need. Now, people complain if their laptop only has 16 GB. Likewise, there will never be such a thing as "too much performance" in a CPU. The limiting factor for iPhones and all other portable electronics is batteries.
@mclovin6537
@mclovin6537 Жыл бұрын
I think we can safely say, 3nm will be a huge leap forward. In tsmc we trust.
@ArminDressler
@ArminDressler Жыл бұрын
Don't expect too much. Apple/TSMC will stay on 3 nm for several years and Apple wants to sell better computers every year. So they will not give us a big increase in one step but will spread this to three generations or so. They only made the M1 so much "better" than the Intel chips to get attention and move as many users to Apple Silicon as possible.
@nekogaming8461
@nekogaming8461 Жыл бұрын
@@ArminDressler I mean isnt that the case for everything lol? Intel will make a better chip so that users switch to their products...dont have to make it sound like a one sided problem
@ArminDressler
@ArminDressler Жыл бұрын
@@nekogaming8461 yes, Intel does exactly the same. 10% every year. They could do more, but why should they? It is easier to sell more, if you do small steps with every release. So Apple/TSMCs 3 nm M3/M4 will not be a huge upgrade, just enough to be a fairly nice upgrade.
@cheekynpc8267
@cheekynpc8267 Жыл бұрын
You mean in ASML we trust
@zsoltpeterdaniel8413
@zsoltpeterdaniel8413 Жыл бұрын
@@ArminDressler they will give us lower spec chips first with fewer cores in the name of battery efficiency, then optimise the design for performance
@TheRealMattV
@TheRealMattV Жыл бұрын
Another reason for focusing their comparisons on the A13 is that there is a larger group of existing customers with 2-3 year old iPhones to tempt with the A16 than with the 1 year old A15, most of whom will probably wait another 12 months before upgrading.
@andyH_England
@andyH_England Жыл бұрын
Yes, understanding that it is meaningless for 95% that upgrade from 3+-y-o devices to compare y-o-y, it is pretty sensible to market the leverage in improvement from the A13. This will be more meaningful to the audience looking to upgrade. Do YT creators think they know more than Apple?
@jonathanratliff4780
@jonathanratliff4780 Жыл бұрын
Great breakdown Luke! However won’t the 3nm out next gen have cooler operation and maybe better battery life??
@Derekt7x3
@Derekt7x3 Жыл бұрын
This is a really in depth and well-done review. Apple obviously needs to market something "new" every year, so 4nm. Now there is also the point that pumping out more power from this chip would cause even worse battery life, at least, in this current form factor ;)
@tipoomaster
@tipoomaster Жыл бұрын
It's not too confusing, N4 is very much in the N5 family with clock speed improvements for the same wattage or else power reductions or a combination of both. A16 largely improved by clock speed increases. N3 we should see a bigger architecture change.
@emilianovargas
@emilianovargas Жыл бұрын
I LOVED the quality of this video!! Those b-roll takes are amazing!! Great content and quality, my favorite KZfaqr so far! I salute you from Argentina!
@PorkRoll_F3
@PorkRoll_F3 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree on the B-roll, SUPER smooth camera work with whatever sliders he’s using
@utubekullanicisi
@utubekullanicisi Жыл бұрын
In the last two generations, the main factor that made especially the CPU P-cores faster has been the frequency increases thanks to newer nodes and other architectural tweaks, as we haven't seen much architectural / instructions per clock improvements. On the other hand, the E-cores cores have been improved more significantly in terms of IPC with A15, and the freq. increase it's gotten seems to be more major w/ the A16 than the P-cores. That does mean the E-cores will draw a little more power, but because of its higher performance the P-cores will also need to be activated less, which will most likely offset the power increase for everyday battery life. The biggest factor that will improve the multicore CPU and GPU performance this year will be the fact that A16 switches to LPDDR5 memory from LPDDR4X. And the higher memory bandwidth will improve multithreaded CPU perf. more than singlethreaded perf. because as all of those cores are working hard there will be a bigger strain on the memory bus and the higher bandwidth will help with congestion, think of it like how a wider highway wouldn't help an individual car go much faster, but if there are other cars on the road individual cores will need to slow down much less. And of course higher memory bandwidth will help the GPU the most as graphics is way more parallelized than CPU work. The difference in density between N5P (or N5, since N5P and N5's density is the same, N5P is only a power reduction / freq. improvement, so any more transistors Apple added when they switched to N5P resulted in an increase in die size, but die size increase doesn't necessarily mean an according linear power increase) and N4 is only 4%, and only in logic cells, cache cell density is the same.
@stanislasflipo7214
@stanislasflipo7214 Жыл бұрын
I'd actually be more interested in the performance per watt rather than the performance per core. Maybe it would tell a different story since there have been suspicions that the macbook cores were overclocked compared the the iphone.
@stianburhol
@stianburhol Жыл бұрын
I have the moon climber for 14 pro max, absolutely love it - the kickstand is a must-have ❤
@trainsandmodelshungary
@trainsandmodelshungary Жыл бұрын
Another grrrreaaat video! Second vid recently that i find spot on, talking about what I actually want to hear. Thanks!
@stormrider01
@stormrider01 Жыл бұрын
Nice camera moves man!
@trainsandmodelshungary
@trainsandmodelshungary Жыл бұрын
P.S. I’m loving your videos lately, and would looooove to hear your thoughts on the current iPad mini. Do you have a review video on that? I can’t seem to find it. 😢
@OklahomaSania
@OklahomaSania Жыл бұрын
Thank you for great reviews. I like your channel. Big 👍🏻
@brianrobinson3961
@brianrobinson3961 Жыл бұрын
It was reported the 4nm node is actually a modified 5nm node. The jump to 3nm should have the generational die shrink benefits that we have seen in previous die shrinks.
@chadh6855
@chadh6855 Жыл бұрын
nm doesn't even mean nanometers between gates anymore. They're using it as more of a marketing term now to show differences between generations than how much they've actually shrunk the chip. It get's confusing because Intel's 10nm chip actually has more transistors for a given size than TSMCs 7nm. They've run into barriers with physics for shrinking it any more. Once they get sub 1nm it will be interesting because they will need to find new ways of marketing the chip process - it would be very misleading to say transistors are less than 1 nanometer apart.
@chadh6855
@chadh6855 Жыл бұрын
@Forgiveness or Love Val was probably not interested in Aaron in that way (even though he was working out, buying new clothes, renting another house, trying to find a mate other than his wife) and if she ever was for a brief time she isn’t now.
@chadh6855
@chadh6855 Жыл бұрын
@Forgiveness or Love a couple things you have to realize is Aaron is a bit of a loser- no job, hardly makes anything off his KZfaq channel, not anything like a minimum wage job provides- and women don’t like that. Also, Val may have a bit of a drinking problem. I mean, her last two videos with him she didn’t drink and the two before that she reluctantly took a shot he gave her that she didn’t look like she wanted to take, but overall she embraced the alcohol and it was clear Aaron saw it as the key to her pants coming off. But that causes problems.
@adamesd3699
@adamesd3699 Жыл бұрын
@@chadh6855 WTF? How did we go from discussing microchips to Aaron and Val’s mixed up love-life? I’m sure I’m missing something. Won’t be the first time.
@00SNIVY00
@00SNIVY00 Жыл бұрын
Something I wonder is...how much does year over year improvements really matter? How much improvement is Qualcomm making every year with their chips? From the 888 to the 8 gen1, was there a significant performance improvement?
@TechieXP
@TechieXP Жыл бұрын
Gary Explains it just the A15 with some tweaks. Which means they could have put this chop in every model. But they didn't so they could resell you last years phones that are stuck ok the shelf that they didn't sell.
@deanopatoni
@deanopatoni Жыл бұрын
Torras are fantastic cases and the only ones that I trust to protect my iPhone and those of my family. Kudos! (first time I have ever commented on a sponsor or advert). Now back to the video....
@mahanc1124
@mahanc1124 Жыл бұрын
Same, I have the Torras Case for the X, 11, and 13, And i'll be getting one for the 14 Pro
@baskorosuryaputra1925
@baskorosuryaputra1925 Жыл бұрын
I feel things like the neural engine, encoders, ISP is probably as important in the A16 as the CPU yang GPU. But 14% better single core year over year is honestly more than I expected. It's a shame that the battery life is apparently worse than the iPhone 13 Pro though. I wonder if that's due to the A16 or perhaps other factors.
@andyH_England
@andyH_England Жыл бұрын
...other factors, mainly buggy iOS 16.
@bertantuncel
@bertantuncel Жыл бұрын
Great video thanks Luke!
@patrickreuvekamp
@patrickreuvekamp Жыл бұрын
I am glad that I am not the only one having difficulties cleaning between the cameras.
@DhananjayNaik
@DhananjayNaik Жыл бұрын
can you make a video on all interactions with dynamic island? - when timer and music are running, what happens when you start a yt video - does dynamic island shows up in lockscreen - any other you can think of?
@Andru
@Andru Жыл бұрын
Tell me where to get that lamp fam!!
@Ronald7077
@Ronald7077 Жыл бұрын
All very technical - I just want to know is the 16 percentage wise faster than the 15. Is it worth the money? Torras cases were a good tip and thanks for the links.
@shuttzi9878
@shuttzi9878 Жыл бұрын
15-17% Faster CPU 20% faster GPU 50% more memory bandwith
@ArthurET
@ArthurET Жыл бұрын
Your camera setup is different now you have a cameraman, it makes the video better, keep going 🙏
@SN-hn9zi
@SN-hn9zi Жыл бұрын
Think it’s jsut on a slider?
@Kapono5150
@Kapono5150 Жыл бұрын
The more iPhone 14 Pro content this man creates and uploads, the more I realize how smart it was to keep my 13 Pro and skip this year. Thank You 🙏 Sir
@RiccardoMerloVegan
@RiccardoMerloVegan Жыл бұрын
Still considering iPhone 13 out of this world performance, iPhone 14 is still faster and still sit in your hand. This performance are good for a desktop computer
@C111TYGWORL
@C111TYGWORL Жыл бұрын
Nobody cares
@sky.london
@sky.london Жыл бұрын
Nice camera moves, did u get a fancy motorised slider?
@achyutsun
@achyutsun Жыл бұрын
What's the iPhone 14 Modem? Is it Qualcomm x55? or Qualcomm x65? iPhone 14 Pro(& Pro Max) has Qualcomm x65 modem, but what's in iPhone 14 base. Thank you.
@daniel_960_
@daniel_960_ Жыл бұрын
I think the main difference is clockspeed. A14 was the original 5nm chip, A15 had higher clock and new efficiency core I think plus one more gpu core on the pro made on the optimized 5n plus node, A16 higher clock on the further optimized 4n node which actually still is the same 5nm process. Bigger changes probably coming with the 3nm node which is a new process.
@MaciekP2
@MaciekP2 Жыл бұрын
It is strange you didnt mention the cpu clock difference so real improvement is the performance difference not counting cpu clock change
@PWingert1966
@PWingert1966 Жыл бұрын
I dont think we will get an idea of improvements in the A-Series chips until we see the performance gap between M2 and M3 that will serve as an index mark for the refences A17 and beyond.
@HiFiInsider
@HiFiInsider Жыл бұрын
can you make a behind the scenes video on how you make these videos?
@marufbepary100
@marufbepary100 Жыл бұрын
I seems like Apple just took the A15 and manufactured it on the new 4nm without optimising it for that node.
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@jonathanmarten6976
@jonathanmarten6976 Жыл бұрын
I think you could’ve done more by comparing clockspeed etc. I thought I’ll get more of this video. Still a great channel.
@BotanistOnDuna
@BotanistOnDuna Жыл бұрын
I wish we could configure more gpu cores and more ram on the 14 pro
@TheiTE
@TheiTE Жыл бұрын
Great video, while I usually don't comment on videos, I had to on this one. Really loving the camera movements, they add so much to the video, it keeps the viewer hooked and entertained. Would love to see more of this!
@Truth_Seeker1
@Truth_Seeker1 Жыл бұрын
We will have to wait for software update that fixes battery on the 14 to see the true battery difference.
@adredy
@adredy Жыл бұрын
@Jon David slow down cpu and here you go they can simple :)
@Eddy_E.
@Eddy_E. Жыл бұрын
Spoiler, this update will never come… The issue is not the software, it’s just the limit of the processor engineering where we are now… Everything under 5nm is just less efficient, it will mostly take more energy for the same tasks and when the will shrink the dies even smaller we will get even less battery life… When you get so small (under 5 nm) the electrons are not longer stable on the line, they will just jump over and the transistor will just not work in this moment and it just needs a new try which cost the same energy as the first try (just to keep it simple)… And this is an physical border with the silizium we use for processors, with other materials we can maybe get it somewhat further but for now we have reached the limit…
@lucascampos494
@lucascampos494 Жыл бұрын
@@Eddy_E. iOS 16 right now is a little messy. Staying in 15.7 for a month at least
@TheBasementChannel
@TheBasementChannel Жыл бұрын
Love the panning shot
@Followerofchrist2091
@Followerofchrist2091 Жыл бұрын
We have finally hit the flat line in Technology advancement in phones for a while I think.
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@firstnamelastname2971
@firstnamelastname2971 Жыл бұрын
Not rlly
@jesseandersen4055
@jesseandersen4055 Жыл бұрын
Funny how last year we said the A15 was on the same process as the a14 (even though it added billions of transistors and was honestly a pretty decent upgrade in terms of performance AND performance per watt), but this year we say it’s on a new process even though “4nm” is just the 3rd generation, or the second upgrade to their 5 nm process.
@chadh6855
@chadh6855 Жыл бұрын
nm doesn't even mean nanometers between gates anymore. They're using it as more of a marketing term now to show differences between generations than how much they've actually shrunk the chip. It get's confusing because Intel's 10nm chip actually has more transistors for a given size than TSMCs 7nm. They've run into barriers with physics for shrinking it any more. Once they get sub 1nm it will be interesting because they will need to find new ways of marketing the chip process - it would be very misleading to say transistors are less than 1 nanometer apart.
@jesseandersen4055
@jesseandersen4055 Жыл бұрын
@@chadh6855 exactly. And even with a lower density tsmc is universally considered the most advanced chip maker in the world. So density isn’t a good indicator. Distance between gates is irrelevant. It’s all just marketing. Everyone got on my case last year for mentioning that the second gen 5nm was a pretty big upgrade. And this year everyone wonders why not much has changed even though there’s a “new process.”
@chadh6855
@chadh6855 Жыл бұрын
@@jesseandersen4055 well the fact is they've hit a wall. Intel is really bummed about it and struggling to maintain superiority but ultimately if our computers and phones worked any faster we wouldn't notice. When I bought my first computer in 1998 with a 250+ nm Pentium chip and floppy disk drive improving nm process was definitely important. Not today.
@chadh6855
@chadh6855 Жыл бұрын
@Forgiveness or Love everyone has trouble imagining the future. When I was a kid we were told we would have a colony on the moon and flying cars. Nothing about iPhones. The fact is there’s not a breakthrough in computing power that will affect our daily lives anywhere on the horizon, unfortunately.
@james11h
@james11h Жыл бұрын
I play Apex Legends Mobile and I’ve noticed a huge thermal performance improvement on the A16 vs A15. I used to get screen dimming after 10 min on High settings. Now I can max it out on Ultra HD at 60 FPS and no thermal issues at all for 20 min+.
@simoneh4732
@simoneh4732 Жыл бұрын
How do you know that the A16's GPU cores didn't throttle during the Wildlife benchmark?
@adredy
@adredy Жыл бұрын
:) faster and faster where ? i wanna se batery how long it last when you record in max res ! or edit some videos
@Eddy_E.
@Eddy_E. Жыл бұрын
Even if the difference is just a joke, 5nm was the magic wall, everything what will come from now would just bring minor differences anymore… Moores Law just find the end of it self… And when we take it precisely the law has already found it’s end a couple of years ago cuz Moores Law say, same power with just the half of the size every year… The last year where we see a jump where we doubled (or at least nearly) the power over just a year was 2015 or something like this… And now we get even to the point where we maybe get more a step back as forward how the iphone 14 pros already show us today…
@framebuyframe2493
@framebuyframe2493 Жыл бұрын
Great comparison! Thank you.
@ahmad_ali79
@ahmad_ali79 Жыл бұрын
Is action mode available on the front camera? My biggest question.. as no one has mentioned it yet.
@Riko_KP
@Riko_KP Жыл бұрын
No. Why would you even need that?
@davout5775
@davout5775 Жыл бұрын
4nm is 3rd generation 5nm. I think they used 4nm as a marketing trick to counter Samsung who also claimed 4nm. Well Samsung's 4nm cannot perform as good as even TSMC's 7nm processes but I guess marketing is more important than truth nowadays
@lancer1993
@lancer1993 Жыл бұрын
This is just one reason I just ordered an iPhone 11 Pro used/refurbished. Add the hilariously big camera bump, USB-C and I'll wait for the 15 for my next new iPhone. The 11 Pro I ordered with a massive 512 of storage and it was about 1/3rd the cost of the equivalent 14 Pro.
@daveadams6421
@daveadams6421 Жыл бұрын
Personally I'm more excited about what next year's iPhone brings to the table 😀
@mikldude9376
@mikldude9376 Жыл бұрын
I wouldnt expect any staggering upgrades mate , apple has a business model that dishes out just enough tweaks each year to sell to the natives , while absolutely giving not one iota more than the bean counters will allow , we saw very much the same happening with the M1 to M2 macbook models . Apple probably could have given us this year , better multi tasking , a decent USB-c port instead of the crappy lightning 2.0 rubbish , , a better camera zoom , faster charging , reverse wireless charging , but apple no doubt wants to keep some bits in the parts box so next years iphones will have something to upsell to the natives . and who knows of those improvements i just listed , apple may still spread them out over 3 years lol, again with just enough , to call it a saleable item for the next new model .
@almand3000
@almand3000 Жыл бұрын
Thunderbolt 4
@johnmichaelb1
@johnmichaelb1 Жыл бұрын
The 3 year chassis redesign cadence they (tech youtubers) talk about is complete. Rumors are that next year would be a redesign of the physical appearance and - fingers crossed - USB-C.
@Eddy_E.
@Eddy_E. Жыл бұрын
For sure but at least one thing we can say already, it will not be way more power anymore…😜
@daveadams6421
@daveadams6421 Жыл бұрын
@@mikldude9376 I'll extend my induced coma until 2024 then 😎
@JustinFYI
@JustinFYI Жыл бұрын
I've yet to see anyone review if there is also a 128GB vs 256GB storage speed difference like there was on the MacBook Air M2. The iPhone 13 Pro had different camera features based upon the amount of storage the phone had.
@Juanguar
@Juanguar Жыл бұрын
ooh I actually wanna see that albeit it wouldn't make sense since iPhones use 1 chip for storage unlike macs who can use 2 chips
@JustinFYI
@JustinFYI Жыл бұрын
@Jon David Perhaps, but their original vendors for nand chips WD & KIOXIA have 3 different SKUs with 3 different transfer speeds, not to mention that Apple was rumored to begin using a new vendor Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. this year because of contamination issues. Single SSD chip or not, I can't find any analysis on anything beyond the typical info on SoC, the new LPDDR5 RAM this year, the new screen brightness, new 5G antenna and differing battery size.
@tonylancer7367
@tonylancer7367 Жыл бұрын
@@JustinFYI It could be under NDA, or in a schematic somewhere that someone is not interested in. I don't know if teardowns show the chips and if they do what's written on them?
@fidelisitor8953
@fidelisitor8953 Жыл бұрын
@@tonylancer7367 A16
@daniel_960_
@daniel_960_ Жыл бұрын
even the 1tb version is one chip on the iPhone so there can't be an alike difference to the m2 mac anyway. The 128gb pro res limitation is nothing more than a software thing.
@dennismunsie2161
@dennismunsie2161 Жыл бұрын
Comparing against a 3 year old device makes sense if you think about who is the biggest group of upgraders - people with 3 year old phones or older.
@RolandGustafsson
@RolandGustafsson Жыл бұрын
I got the 14 Pro Max and it feels noticeably snappier vs my previous 13 Pro Max which surprised me because the 13 Pro is no slouch. The multi-core difference is higher than single core and perhaps that's what helps in this case.
@Eddy_E.
@Eddy_E. Жыл бұрын
No, for normal workflow is just the Singlecore performance important, multicore comes only to the table when we talk about hard work like high end games, video editing and stuff like this… That it feels more snapier is just your imagination, nearly all tests shows the same, the „jump“ from a15 to a16 is just small step and that’s completly normal cause 5nm works just more efficient as 4nm… From now every more shrinking just means more heat and just a bit smaller, more power is from now only a thing of software anymore…
@RolandGustafsson
@RolandGustafsson Жыл бұрын
@@Eddy_E. I’m a developer and I understand how multicore is used, and general usage definitely is affected by multicore. In my own code I’ve written many time consuming tasks to operate in parallel and the faster performance of cores matters. It’s not my imagination. 😉
@Eddy_E.
@Eddy_E. Жыл бұрын
@@RolandGustafsson multiple parallel operations are not really general usage for most, for most general usage is surfing on safari and you can be sure that apples developer can handle that even with the singlecores, otherwise the battery will never hold so long a charge… So only cuz you are write inefficient code doesn’t mean that every developer do so…😜 Next to that you are the first person who ever said that low tasks need multicoreperformance, no one else do so and with that I think i’am better with the other opinions…😉
@RolandGustafsson
@RolandGustafsson Жыл бұрын
@@Eddy_E. Ha ha! I develop for the iPhone and know what I’m doing - optimizing is my specialty both single and multi core. What have you coded?
@alooy3331
@alooy3331 Жыл бұрын
got the XS max and didnt want to upgrade to any of 11,12,13 or 14 pros.. they arent a game changer and are slightly faster with few new features but overall its been almost the same, looking forward for the upcoming Iphone Ultra Models. only then itd be worth the upgrade leap
@robojobot77
@robojobot77 Жыл бұрын
Friend and I were just discussing how this didn’t feel like much of an upgrade. I went right to your channel to figure out why.
@MrLuigi-oi7gm
@MrLuigi-oi7gm Жыл бұрын
I'm no expert, but is using percent change the best way to compare generations of chips? For example, what's better, getting a 20% pay raise when you're making $10,000/year or getting a 10% pay raise when you're making $100,000/year? Clearly the smaller percent pay raise actually represents a much better pay raise.
@ochibella9562
@ochibella9562 Жыл бұрын
Amazing review 👍🏾
@zergadis0
@zergadis0 Жыл бұрын
Imo phone manufacturers should finally acknowledge, that benchmarks of flagship cpus are not relevant anymore in 2022 - I don't care about the fact, that phone got 5000 pts in Geekbench if it isn't able to maintain stable 120 fps (and sometimes even 60) in most games for more than 10 mins.
@Leo-yn5fx
@Leo-yn5fx Жыл бұрын
waiting on a 3nm macbook pro and iphone hopefully the full screen this time.
@isaacleewatkins
@isaacleewatkins Жыл бұрын
Hey Luke, I just switched over to ALL apple products this year having had to buy a couple of home pod mini’s to have them mounted in my bedroom to the walls, they are so good at allowing me to go to sleep it’s not even funny.
@Taylor-cy3cd
@Taylor-cy3cd Жыл бұрын
Temperature?
@ArminDressler
@ArminDressler Жыл бұрын
You can not compare cores without looking at the clock speeds! If they are clocked 10% higher and computes 10% faster, than the core itself is not faster per clock cycle. It may be a bit more energy efficient so it can run faster without drawing more power or getting hotter though.
@mootsym
@mootsym Жыл бұрын
very interesting. I was super excited to see A16 based on 4nm, but not seeing many gains in both performance and battery is concerning. Gotta think M2 pro will have 300g/sec ram, the faster internet speeds, faster SSD.. and perhaps 15% improved performance with 15% improved battery life? Is it worth it or maybe make more sense to get the M1 pro with 1TB SSD and unbinned chip for $400 off at best buy?
@roundduckkira
@roundduckkira Жыл бұрын
M2 is based on A15, not A16
@mootsym
@mootsym 11 ай бұрын
@@roundduckkira a bit late on this lol
@hishnash
@hishnash Жыл бұрын
The comparative better perf of the M2 gpu cores will be doing to memory bandwidth and on die cache.
@pratyushanand2111
@pratyushanand2111 Жыл бұрын
4nm isn’t a full process node. Its more of branding and optimising the 5 nm process ( which itself wasn’t a huge jump from 7nm). 3nm process node will be a full process node jump from 7nm. So there is not a lot of performance gains. It will mostly save more power than performance.
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@lastcall9998
@lastcall9998 Жыл бұрын
Will we ever have an iphone with USB C type connection and not Lightning? I refuse to buy one until they do.
@ky5250
@ky5250 Жыл бұрын
Recently just raised the prices of battery replacements. Different approach to planned obsolescence maybe?
@yestoES355
@yestoES355 Жыл бұрын
I notice a much weaker battery with my 14 pro max compared to my 13 pro max at 98% battery health. I wonder if it’s the chip over working and not being optimized
@Cappyey
@Cappyey Жыл бұрын
It could be that your using more brightness, the 14 Pro’s display goes up to 2000 nits unlike the 13 Pro which only goes up to 1200 nits in HDR. The always-on display can also drain your battery.
@zenbum2654
@zenbum2654 Жыл бұрын
Luke said the SC performance is about 14% faster. He's wrong. It's actually only 8.4% faster. Maybe he was thinking of the other scores: MC is 13.2% faster, CP is 14.6%. A lot of the performance gain is due to a faster clock speed: 3.44 GHz vs 3.23 GHz, a 6.5% increase. And going from 5 nm to 4 nm has also helped, since smaller transistors have faster switching times. Finally, Apple says the A16 efficiency cores have better performance, which further helps MC scores. We now apparently live in a post-Moore's Law world, so don't expect processor performance to increase dramatically each year like it used to. Improvements in the future may be logarithmic instead of exponential.
@flexairz
@flexairz Жыл бұрын
Do like I did: went from A12 to A15.. amazing difference. Performance comes in little baby steps..
@gveresUW
@gveresUW Жыл бұрын
I think it makes perfect sense that Apple choose to compare the A16 to the A13. I suspect they picked a chip that beats the competitor's current 2022 CPUs (as seen in thier graph) and it is the one that most people who are going to upgrade would be coming from. I think they realize that most people are keeping their phone for around 3 years, meaning those people would be coming from the A13-ish generation of CPU. I know all of the youtube reviewers want to know how it compares to last year, but that isn't what most of the public needs to know.
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@mgaming7
@mgaming7 Жыл бұрын
it's 4 years ahead of snapdragon. it's good enough even if they kept the A16 2 more years
@u563rick6
@u563rick6 Жыл бұрын
I’m disappointed they haven’t moved to a new version of Arm yet! It’ll come with a performance boost also.
@kamikakushi_
@kamikakushi_ Жыл бұрын
Apple design their own architecture. Sure they do take some of the ARM IPs but, the rest is completely custom made by Apple.
@Andrew-he4cu
@Andrew-he4cu Жыл бұрын
"KZfaqr falls for foundry process node marketing" 🤣
@Vladx35
@Vladx35 Жыл бұрын
It seems from tests that while the chip runs not that much faster, as the A15 was already a beast, it seems to run cooler for longer. Basically better for extreme gamers on their iPhones.
@Daniel-qy9mb
@Daniel-qy9mb Жыл бұрын
Another reason to slow down a mobile chip is to save a battery. Something Apple knows all too well.
@huplim
@huplim Жыл бұрын
Thanks Luke!
@fadelmahade3044
@fadelmahade3044 Жыл бұрын
The cost of iPhone in Morocco is the price of two iphone 14 pro. Apple open a store over here please
@RiseUpToYourAbility
@RiseUpToYourAbility Жыл бұрын
Everyone keeps talking about faster and faster CPU, but what is the point when your phone doesn't have proper cooling. No matter how efficient you make the cores, eventually you will hit a ceiling for performance without proper cooling. Heck even using the phone while it is charging makes it super hot. Also more and more powerful CPU drain the battery quicker. Honestly the majority of people just use their phones for web browsing, instagram, ETC. Why on earth do you need all this performance?
@utubekullanicisi
@utubekullanicisi Жыл бұрын
It's not really a surprise that A16 uses the same CPU cores and GPU cores as the A15, and it was no surprise that the A15 used (almost) the same P-cores on the CPU side as the A14 either. N4 is actually technically a frequency regression compared to N5P (~2% slower), but thanks to Apple's tight collab with TSMC and other architectural optimizations, they were still able to increase the frequency and not downclock the A16 compared to A15. In short, A16 uses the "same" CPU cores as A15, M1, or A14 (though, if A16's P-cores can clock 7% higher at 20% lower power, you can't really call them the "same" cores, even if the perf. increase is small or if the transistor layout is very similar, just like how you (and Apple's engineers with their codenames) couldn't call the A15's P-cores the same as A14) (and again, "the same cores but clocked a little higher" doesn't cut it either because, again, it clocks higher (or is clocked higher), and uses less power or less energy to complete the same task). And A16 has the "same" GPU cores as A15, and (partially) M1 (and the GPU cores seem to have been improved the *least*, so calling them "the same" is maybe the most suitable for the GPUs). While we point out that the M1 is derived from A14 whenever we talk about it, its GPU cores were quite different in that it had 2x higher FP32 throughput than the A14's GPU cores. A15 adopted this new architecture a year later and put more features on top, like sparse depth/stencil map and lossy texture compression. But A16 doesn't seem to have changed much in terms of new GPU features, so we can call A16 and A15 "the same" in this regard. The biggest factor that will improve the *multicore CPU* and GPU performance this year will be the fact that A16 switches to LPDDR5 memory from LPDDR4X. And the reason it will improve multithreaded CPU perf. more than singlethreaded perf. is because as all of those cores are working hard there will be a bigger strain on the memory bus, think of it like how a wider highway wouldn't help an individual car go much faster, but if there are other cars on the road individual cores will face much less congestion. And of course higher memory bandwidth will help the GPU the most as graphics is way more parallelized than CPU work.
@davidgarza311
@davidgarza311 Жыл бұрын
Now the 95% of people doesn't need more performance, we need more autonomy and power efficient, so I prefer get 4 years in 4 nm but each generation better in efficiency than previous. (At least 10% better each year)
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@mova_2020
@mova_2020 Жыл бұрын
Honestly even an iPhone X is so fast today that you can’t feel a difference as a normal user which 99.9% of us are.
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@colindoyle9876
@colindoyle9876 Жыл бұрын
Don't cases trap heat inside?
@MW-mn1el
@MW-mn1el Жыл бұрын
TSMC 4nm is just minor improvement to 5nm, it’s the same node. Next big jump is 3nm for iPhone next year.
@jofernandez73
@jofernandez73 Жыл бұрын
What video ratio is this?
@terryclair2914
@terryclair2914 Жыл бұрын
Did you mention the clock speed of the A16 compared to the M2 CPU?
@daniel_960_
@daniel_960_ Жыл бұрын
I think not. Probably only difference there is. Consume the n4 efficiency advantage with higher clock speed.
@drakata27
@drakata27 Жыл бұрын
You have 14 pro and 14 pro max. Why didn't you test the 14 pro as well? Max Tech found that the 14 pro is actually slower in terms of geek bench multicore compared to 14 Pro max because it is smaller and cannot cool as well as the pro max
@domdani6560
@domdani6560 Жыл бұрын
Following the updates the , the a16 bionic has not been fine tuned yet, give it a few months with the updates once it’s tuned a little we will the battery and performance improvement, and what the a16 can handle
@midway222
@midway222 Жыл бұрын
Seems like the same chip. Just upped the clock speed a little to take advantage of 4nm.
@jbourdon1
@jbourdon1 Жыл бұрын
Luke, Question for you and your followers? Does any of your followers had an issue with the screen doing a squeaking sound when you press near the dynamic Island, even when the phone is turned off?
@SPTSuperSprinter156
@SPTSuperSprinter156 Жыл бұрын
it sounds like a manufacturing defect. I had a similar problem with the iPhone 6, it would squeak when you pressed one of the corners. That phone turned out to be a total dog, hated it and gladly got rid of it after a few years.
@ross13
@ross13 Жыл бұрын
Where’s the 14% improvement coming from on single core performance? Based on those numbers, that’s only an 8% improvement.
@ChristopherJohnJackson
@ChristopherJohnJackson Жыл бұрын
This is why I don’t upgrade the iPhone every year, I upgrade every four years! 😁
@sam_9228
@sam_9228 Жыл бұрын
Same! I’ve had the iPhone X since launch and I’m upgrading to the 14 Pro Max
@ChristopherJohnJackson
@ChristopherJohnJackson Жыл бұрын
@@sam_9228 Nice, so the eSIM, MagSafe and Airtag going to be new to you. I was on XS.
@DeRock401
@DeRock401 Жыл бұрын
So I guess you decided to go with the pro vs the pro max ?
@yiweizhang2485
@yiweizhang2485 Жыл бұрын
How are you getting 14% faster on single core? 1874 / 1728 = 1.084 more like 8.5% faster... Multi-core however is about 13-14% faster...
@diandrecarty4512
@diandrecarty4512 Жыл бұрын
Listen they have topped the performance , they just don’t see the pint in making it any faster because it’s already was ahead of it’s time so just make it more efficient simple
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@AppleReviews
@AppleReviews Жыл бұрын
*Better tell me if iPhone 14s have Noise Cancelling in Phone Calls as in 13s Apple disabled this feature*
@rxdmac
@rxdmac Жыл бұрын
I believe the A16 chip is mHz lowered to use less energy I.e. battery life rather than waste it on questionable speed boost advantage. This helps keep battery weight/size down while still improving or sustaining current norms. M2 chips will not be so constrained for energy saving and will likely see higher mHz speeds for purposeful gains. I think this should be more obvious than your speculated concerns.
@pokerev60telegm
@pokerev60telegm Жыл бұрын
Let's talk......
@THA_PROdeuca
@THA_PROdeuca Жыл бұрын
Hey Luke did you know the iPhone 14s A15 has the same amount of cores as the A16? It has 1 GPU core more than the iPhone 13 A15 chip (as per Apple Store app). Is there a test for this?
@ggs4765
@ggs4765 Жыл бұрын
The next iPhone will just be a dynamic island. Code name Cyclops.
@Sacto1654
@Sacto1654 Жыл бұрын
I think the next major leap forward will be the A17 Soc, which will be built on TSMC's new 3 nm process that they have been working on for 3-4 years. I wouldn't be surprised that the 2023 iPhones will have two versions of A17: iPhone 17 and 17 Plus: 4 high-performance CPU cores, four high-efficiency CPU cores, 5 GPU cores, and 6 GB of RAM. iPhone 17 Pro models: 4 high-performance CPU cores, four high-efficiency CPU cores, 6 GPU cores, and 8 GB of RAM. The A17 will integrate with either Qualcomm's X70 radio modem chip for better 5G connectivity and a new (maybe!) Broadcom chip for full WiFi 6E (802.11ax extended) support.
@katlegoditiro8323
@katlegoditiro8323 8 ай бұрын
You’re comment aged like fine wine
@ronthorn3
@ronthorn3 Жыл бұрын
I have had Torras case for over a year and it’s fucking solid as F! Had to get a new one find my iPhone 14 pro max and it’s fantastic!
@cool10234
@cool10234 Жыл бұрын
Luke, differences in processors is not simply cpu and gpu, how about the much improved display engine, isp , faster neural engine , more memory bandwidth….. this isn’t a huge update at all but this comparison ignores everything they actually marketed the new chip to do. It wasn’t about making it 25% to satisfy tech KZfaq , it was about making a better iPhone processor to enable new functionality. According to Kuo, M3 will be based off of 3nm as will the A17. I’d put my money on that being where the real cpu/ gpu improvements come into play.
@MrSamPhoenix
@MrSamPhoenix Жыл бұрын
Well said!
@AshishSinghh
@AshishSinghh Жыл бұрын
Yeah CPU is not about processing, and not about graphics. You are right
@palacebarrel
@palacebarrel Жыл бұрын
@@AshishSinghh there is so much more to it, if you look at the die it isnt made of cpu cores and gpu cores only
@hardikphotos9813
@hardikphotos9813 Жыл бұрын
I didn’t find the A14 slow, 120hz was more of an upgrade to me than A16. However I find huge difference when compared to 4GB A13. Happy with it and don’t care about benchmarks
@KokkiePiet
@KokkiePiet Жыл бұрын
you are right, but that doesn't bring the clicks. Luke isn't about making such observations, it's about getting views and clicks.
@Truth_Seeker1
@Truth_Seeker1 Жыл бұрын
In Mrwhosetheboss battery test the 13PM lasted 19 minutes more than the 14PM. The 14 has 29MAH smaller battery. But it’s high performance core is 20% more power efficient than the A15 the new 5G chip (X65) is also more power efficient.
@janeS9773
@janeS9773 Жыл бұрын
Strange , my 14 pro max is lasting way longer than my iphone 13 pro max. odd.
@andyH_England
@andyH_England Жыл бұрын
His test was maybe on iOS 16.0 rather than iOS 16.01. Also some apps he used may have not yet been optimised. I have seen three tests after his and the 14PM beats the 13PM in all of them. So it is clear the 14PM has better battery life, and that should improve with further optimisations and updates. My S22U at launch got less than 3hrs SoT but now gets 5-6 hours after the Sept update (6 months later). Hopefully the iPhones wont take that long!
Does your iPhone actually get SLOWER over time?
12:18
Luke Miani
Рет қаралды 573 М.
A15 Bionic - How Apple DESTROYED Qualcomm
21:35
Rene Ritchie
Рет қаралды 216 М.
Женская драка в Кызылорде
00:53
AIRAN
Рет қаралды 488 М.
ЧУТЬ НЕ УТОНУЛ #shorts
00:27
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #comedy
00:40
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Is Apple's A16 Bionic really *NEW*?
16:40
High Yield
Рет қаралды 12 М.
A17 Pro is HIDING a dirty secret?
7:58
Luke Miani
Рет қаралды 131 М.
iPhone 16 with PROBLEMS??
8:46
TechAmigo
Рет қаралды 1 М.
15 Smartphone FAILS to ruin your day 😂
23:51
Mrwhosetheboss
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
The $2.1 Billion McDonald's Machine
10:35
fern
Рет қаралды 854 М.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Apple A15 Bionic vs Apple A16 Bionic
8:13
Gary Explains
Рет қаралды 43 М.
ONE reason why the Apple Ecosystem CRUSHES Google’s
14:12
Luke Miani
Рет қаралды 160 М.
Phone repairs are getting ridiculous - Here's why.
22:24
Mrwhosetheboss
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
What is the Apple A17 Pro? Breakdown and Explanation
11:32
Gary Explains
Рет қаралды 47 М.
$1 vs $100,000 Slow Motion Camera!
0:44
Hafu Go
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
low battery 🪫
0:10
dednahype
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Что делать если в телефон попала вода?
0:17
Лена Тропоцел
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН