Administrative Law - Vavilov and the Supreme Court of Canada

Рет қаралды 5,810

Күн бұрын

At Law and Freedom 2020, the annual conference of the Runnymede Society, Prof. Jamie Chai Yun Liew (University of Ottawa), Brandon Kain (McCarthy Tétrault LLP), and Dr. Leonid Sirota (Auckland University of Technology) discussed the state of administrative law in Canada after the ruling of the Supreme Court in Vavilov. The panel was moderated by Alexander Bogach (Harvard).
Date: February 29, 2020
Location: Hart House, University of Toronto

Пікірлер: 13

@jeanmarcus9048 4 жыл бұрын

Vavilov is a good example of when the SCC provided clarity to the substantive review analysis in admin law

@Unnatural09 3 жыл бұрын

Dunsmuir needs to be upgraded.

@RandyPass 4 жыл бұрын

Why is there music in the background?

@runnymedesociety1125 4 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately there was a bit of interference coming in through the mics when they were positioned in certain ways. We tried our best to reduce it but we weren't able to resolve it before the panel ended.

@RandyPass 4 жыл бұрын

@@runnymedesociety1125 Thanks for responding. Good panel nonetheless. Just makes listening with headphones challenging ;)

@maneetgiri25 2 жыл бұрын

Have NCA admin law exam next week. Trying to soak in the substantive review from all the sources. Thank you for your expert opinion on the case law. I am very much confident now.

@bobelliott2748 6 ай бұрын

The Runnymede Society is very interesting. Full of law students who are full of passion and intelligence. Not a lot of wisdom or life experience but that will come. I'm an old guy who can follow the arguments (mostly). We need these people

@khankhan-dc9eo 4 жыл бұрын

Its so funny the reaction on tax query

@ve_rb 3 жыл бұрын

When the statute gives a right of appeal to the court the standard is correctness so I don’t know what that guy was saying wrt the broadcasting act

@olivierbishop-mercier8818 3 жыл бұрын

statutory right of appeal means the court uses the rule in Housen v Nikolaisen. SOR is correctness for questions of law and 'palpable and overriding error' for questions of fact or mixed fact/law

@ve_rb 3 жыл бұрын

Of course but the way the legislature implements the SRA is always "person can apply for judicial review wrt questions of law"