بیشک آپ نے صحیح فرمایا۔

Respectable Mr Ghamdi has his opinion we may not agree with it but we respect it

Nihayat yak tarfaa biyaan farmayaa aap nay.... tanqeed ker ker kay bol rehay tanqeed nahi....

آمین یارب العالمین 💖

Nailed. Love you.

Kya Hzrt Ali ra NY saza di ya badla lya Hzrt Usman ra ki shahadat ka?

Dr. Asrar said that he does not consider amer mawya as Khalifa-e-rasheed. It was Era of common governance.

@A Z Majoosiyun pai Rafziyun pai khatmallan pai Khomeini k yaaroun pai lanaat bayshumaar

Wow ! That's some response... Nailed it you Hussaini

Wohi follow hoa sir Lakin ager us ko thek samjhen hum tb b aksariyat Ameer e Shaam ko Baghi man'ney k lye tyar nai. In ka aqeeda ye hai k Mtlb ye b thek lakin ghalat wo b nai

Tau history ka subject nikaal dain u mean

کمال کا لیکچر ہے آپ نے تاریخ کا بہت ہی اہم واقعہ کا پس منظر عمدہ طریقے سے بیان کیا۔اللہ آپ کو لمبی زندگی دے آپ اور ڈاکٹر اسرار صاحب نے بہت درست تجزیہ فرما یا

Rightly said

Badaam khayein aap

Y does a Christian wants to know?

A Z thanks

A Z Allah tala qayamat ke din aap sab ko mawia yazeed abi sofian or jitney bhi doshmanan e ahle bait oun ki saf main kharda Karay ameen som ameen!! Ab tou khosh ho hain, hum aap ke liye hamesha dua kartey rahinge

@A Z what a jaahil response. You are such a non entity

allah taala bht ziada ilm se bhtr shi and sacha ilm atta frmaye warna aik galati sare kia kraye pr pani pher deti hay

This is not even anything conclusive in the video, which point in the video you are disagreeing?

I disagree with غامدی

Me toi

whao what a great answer

Mr. Javed Ghamidi" is hell-bent to propagate moral corruption against the teaching of the Quran, by hook or crook, will justify anything he wants with the help of academic [trickery] argument. For example, A committed Secular trickster called Chief Justice Manir of Pakistan in 1956 wittingly caused SHIRK & He engineered the Title Deed of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan instead of Dar-ul-Islam of Pakistan. Pakistan officially is called the Islamic Republic of Pakistan'' Subsequently, the shirk Justice Munir manufactured becomes clear only when you look at the definition closely, it means people & Allah share supreme legislative power over the state of Pakistan. Although the 1971 constitution of Pakistan contradicts power-sharing with God & refutes Republicanism, the damage Justice Munir deliberately caused has never been corrected since 1956 by any Pakistan Parliament. Therefore it is the wicked secular minority lobby, who have ruined the success of Dar-ul-Islam becoming a law bidding unitary community in Pakistan. Pakistan records show Justice Manir knew the Republic's definition. Therefore Muslims must stay alert of these Secular centric academic tricksters, they are extremely sharp, they are foot soldiers of Satan, they will never mend their ways. Unless Pakistan legislators change the official Title Deed of Pakistan, we all stand collectively guilty of committing a national Shirk-e-Khafi. If you look closely at Ghamidi's silence against the practice of Usury, it amplifies his wrong priorities & motives behind his worldwide centers in the garb of Quranic teachings centers. Quran talks of gold & silver currency that holds its intrinsic values. Ghamidi failed to contribute any national effort to ban Usury. A once of gold today will buy the same level of goods or services as it did 100 years ago. On the other hand, the fiat paper currency is unstable and it's value continually decreases & the poor masses around the globe are in dire need of fairness & the capitalist are exploiting cheap labor & causing havoc on the masse disparity between Rich & Poor. he's dead silent on usury. He just wants to Hellenize naive Muslims to become under the secular sphere of influence so that secular minority can swell their numbers in Pakistan, Ghamidi has no right to manipulate naive Muslims who are the potential assets of becoming more pious servants of Lord Almighty God. The Incorrigible neoliberal secular Ghamidi bitterly slanders even the gallantry orthodoxy of Ghazali for his successfully holding back the Dujjalic Secularism onslaught on1.8 billion Muslims since the 11th century. After the 12th century, the West studied in an Islamic school in Spain but then reverted to secularism without realizing that they have ended up constructing a society prone to effeminating man's behavior & caused females to masculinize against the natural & biological reality. After carefully listening to Mr. Ghamidi's misconstrue constructions on Islamic Banking, Male Beards & Female outer-garment. I can safely repeat that all of his corrupt suggestions are fallacious & full of academic prejudice. Mr. Ghamidi sinfully denies the divine law & asserts that the law is only for Prophets pbuh wives. He is attempting to water-down Quranic Law & misleads Muslims in favor of secular ideology which constitutionally rejects the Quran & negates the successful Rightly Guided Khulafa-e-Rashideen & devalues the truthful successors of God's Messenger pbuh. Quran 33;٥٩ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَنْ يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ غَفُورًا رَحِيمًا59 O Prophet! Tell your wives, and your daughters, and the women of the believers, to drape their outer-garment over them. That is more proper, so they will be recognized and not harassed. God is Forgiving and Merciful. Quran 33;59 O Prophet, speak unto thy wives and thy daughters, (((and the wives of the true believers))), that they cast their outer garments over them when they walk abroad; this will be more proper, that they may be known to be matrons of reputation, and may not be affronted by unseemly words or actions. God is gracious and merciful. Mr. Ghamidi sinfully asserts that the above divine Order is only for Prophets PBUH wives & is not for the other Muslim women, despite, a clear express statement that commands the messenger [pbuh] to tell your wives & your daughters and women of Believers to drape [cover] themselves with outer garment when they go out. Subsequently, Mr. Javed Ghamidi is guilty of slandering the Quran of double standards. I see Mr. Ghamidi as a secular shill, acting deceitfully under their Hellenistic sphere of influence, he will lend support to Godless Western ideals, he stands carelessly, affecting to be seen of modern academic, wavering between faith & infidelity, and adhering neither unto these nor unto those: Sadly he is professionally attempting to prejudice Muslim Orthodox beliefs via Imimitaing Greek Secular ideology. This is unacceptable to any intelligent Muslim society. Pakistan Police authorities must stop wicked secular propaganda agents operating on the national media platform & the government must prosecute all NGOs who are taking foreign funding covertly to weaken Islamic values within Dar-ul-Islam Pakistan. Quran 33;36 It is not fit for a true believer of either sex when God and His Apostle have decreed a thing, that they should have the liberty of choosing a different matter of their own: and whoever is disobedient unto God and his Apostle, surely erreth with a manifest error

I agree except that Muawiya ra did NOT later "develop" ambitions for khilafah he then REVEALED his ambition which he harboured even at the time of umar ra.

@@abdulgaffargoolamfareed7633 جزاك الله احسن الجزا

he is munkir hadees so how u accept him to say such things

tmhara b yehi hashar ho. jahil

Hazrat Ali Ra chose hazrat Hasan Ra next to him but hazrat Hasan Ra left government in favour of hazrat Ameer mauvia Ra

@@chronicdiseases6274 You Are an idiot People choose hassan ibn ali not ali a.s

Anwar Hussain why lmam Hassun left power because he know that mawiah will kill all the innocent companions he doesn’t want blood war between Muslims that’s why he give up , just like mola Ali because they know these people wants the power over the Islam!

@anwar Hussain. Ali (RA) never choose Hasan (RA). When people asked him can we choose Hasan (RA) as our next chalipha hz Ali replied 'i don't stop you nor I give you the permission ' it's up to you people . After Ali people chooses hz Hasan RA as their chalipha and for the 6months we should consider Hasan was chalipha.

itni umar ho gai abi tak ye ni jis ko pata chala k khlifa e rashid k hilaaf harooj karny waly ko baaghi kehty hain.us ko kya kaha ja sakta ha

By the ones who killed uthman I.e rebels,=bulwayi=khawarij who formed the basis of fitan.. This is the grup who formed a a third party=dogs of hell when two major MuSlims grups of Ali and Muawiyah who both claimed the same thing i.e they were right.... Ali fought the khawarij and thus it became clear he was closer to truth then Muawiyah but he was correct as well..... About hasan bin Ali it's a prediction he will make pact between two VERY BIG groups of Muslims which was fulfilled when he gave khilafat to muawiyah under whom ummah was united and he appointed yazid just so that ummah will be united like explained by ghmdi sb

You used the word 'prediction (meaning something that might happen)' and then you say it's from Allah.. Whatever is revealed to Prophet through WAHI is full and final not a prediction...

@Ali Siddiqui any mortal human can make a mistake

Ghamdi never was rebellion against Rashid Khilafa. Secondly Islam as law/system/religion was complete after last wahi. So Rashid Khilafat must be taken as government, social law & difference of opinion NOT as part of Islam. It is history that is being discussed not Islam. If you understand this then u may free your mind

It was a political issue.

Az brother you obvious haven't read.

@A Z Sahi Muslim Hadees 240. Sirf Momin Ali SA muhabbat rakhay ga aur munafiq Bughz. Ab ya to Hadees ki kitab ghalat ha kiu k sub k sub Ravi issay Sahi kehtay .. agar yeh Sahi Nahi then apka adha Islam Hadees par khara uska Kia Hoga kiu k phir to har chiz par shak Karo ... Namaz mai Roza mai har chiz main

I think no human after Muhammad ur RasullAllah can be the merit to identify that.

@@mariamtee it's about what you think it's about what Hazrat Muhammad SAW preached. He said that in Sahi Muslim which is the most authenticated book after Quran. Also there is a while concept behind this. Prophet knows what will happen in future and the ummat will divide so he gave his verdict whoever will be with Ali will be on the right path. It was necessary because on the other side wrong concept of Islam was standing. Ali was protecting the real islam preached by Rasool SAW

Ali was human not God.....A human only

Logic was right but u r addicted to old stories taken in favor of one & enmity of other. Those who agree description of Ali's Khilafat from Shia or Sunni perspectives will respond like you. It is not Islam but incidents and rule of law and that time political conditions

@@shakilahmad8246 I could say then you are standing with ghamdi's sab view with ignoring well renowned pious scholars. I am a big admirer of ghamdi sab but it is not possible that he is always right. Hazrat mahwiya fought a war against Hazrat Ali RA. Shabi's were died. Hazrat Mahviyah had a different opinion so he took a path of fighting and got ready to kill sahabas. What a great logic??? If you have a different opinion will you start beating or killing other person???? I am not doubting hazrat Mahviyah's intention but unfortunately he made a mistake.

@@awaisamir786 OK then penalize or point out mistake or crime done either by Ali RA OR Ayesha RA in Jang-e-Jamal? Because dozens of sahabas died from both sides. According to Quran if you kill someone then penalty is HELL. Is this verse only for you and me NOT for Ali RA & Ayesha RA. We are here not to do justice with old time history by declaring it Islam. Islam was complete after Khutba of Muhammad PBUH. Why do you care who was right who was wrong. You living in2021 not year 571. U should raise your voice on today's HUKUMRAN not past as they have nothing to do with us today. Islam is Quran and Sunnat not good or bad actions of SAHABAS.

Totally agree with you. Seige was not held. Actually it happend within days and Muaviyah Bin Sufyan was in Syria as Governer. 2000 - 3000 rebellions were involved in this incident. They were very cleverly trained by Hypocrates, Power Hungry Politicians, Jewishes and other enemies of Islam. But, Muaviyah wanted Govt is totally proven from later events. Maula Ali(R.A.) became a bit helpless as these rebellions mixed up in his followers. If Muaviyah could not have disagreed with Maula Ali(R.A.) and have accepted him as Caliph; thousands of Muslims could have been saved, killer of Usman (R.A.) could have been arrested and punished as well. But, looks like he was more interested in Power.

You need a DNA test brother

@@afzalmemon2518 your dna is ghamidi gando

U don't need it bro agha ali Because I know where you come from Diamond market 😂😂

@@afzalmemon2518 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aN-GdLRqzr2-eJc.html

Haha

What is Secular interpretation of political history... ? please enlighten us on this new subject...

He ignored Quran and Hadees totally

🖕

He is doing business for his generations

@@shahanarizvi1008 he is saying truth.....and he is true scholar of islam.

D Green mawia ko sahabi e rasool karney wala, waqia e karbala ko mun ghardak bataney wala or mola Ali as per jhoti tohmatin lganey waley ko hum ilm phelaney wala alim nahi balkey jahalat phelaney wala alim zaror Khey saktey hai

Questions raised were totally for the seat.

حکومت کرنے کا حق پر شخص اپنا سمجهه سکتا هے۔ اس کى بنىاد پر کهاں فىصله هوتا هے

@@afzalahmad5519 Muawiyah bhi apna HAQ samajhta tha ke hukumat uski hai, lekin nateeja kya nikla? Khaleefa e Raashid ke khilaaf baghawat ki usney? Is baghawat se ummat ka faida hua ya nuqsaan?

Only hundred years?????

🤣🤣🤣

Ibn ishaq

ghamidi ne khud hi likhi khud parhi

Sayedna Ali r.a ko saray he haq pr mantay hain us pr to kisi ka ikhtelaf nhi... Lekin iska mtlb ye b nhi k sayedna muavia r.a batil pr thay... Sayedna muavia b haq pr he tha lekin sayedna Ali r.a zyada haq pr tha.

Ammar bin Yasir r.a wali riwayat ko blkul ghalat andaaz ma pesh kia jata ha... Rawafiz us se jo mtlb nikaltay hain wo asal ma ha nhi.

@@AbdulQadeer-gw4zq حق اور باطل سنا تھا حق اور زیادہ حق ماڈرن روشن خیال تاریخ کا کمال لگتا ہے

@@universalsardar agr ap k ghr ma ap k maa baap ka kisi chz k baray ma ikhtelaf ho jaye to ap kisi ko batil smjho ga ya dono ko un k opinion k mutabiq thk smjho ga?

@@AbdulQadeer-gw4zq جی بلکل اگر گھر میں کچھ لڑائی ہو جاے اور شوہر بیوی کو. یا بیوی شوہر کو قتل کر دے. تب بھی ایک طحق پر اور دوسرا زیادہ حق پو ہو گا؟ سامنے کھلو قتل عام ہوا اور اس پر بھی ایسی دلیلیں حضرت معاویہ رضی اللہ پر کف لسان کا مجمہ علیہ موقف ہی سب دمسے بہتر موقف ہے رہی یزید کی تو اس کو بھی رح بنانے والے موجود ہیں

Galat kadam nasal perasti

Iqtidaar ki hawas

Mr. Javed Ghamidi" is hell-bent to propagate moral corruption against the teaching of the Quran, by hook or crook, will justify anything he wants with the help of academic [trickery] argument. For example, A committed Secular trickster called Chief Justice Manir of Pakistan in 1956 wittingly caused SHIRK & He engineered the Title Deed of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan instead of Dar-ul-Islam of Pakistan. Pakistan officially is called the Islamic Republic of Pakistan'' Subsequently, the shirk Justice Munir manufactured becomes clear only when you look at the definition closely, it means people & Allah share supreme legislative power over the state of Pakistan. Although the 1971 constitution of Pakistan contradicts power-sharing with God & refutes Republicanism, the damage Justice Munir deliberately caused has never been corrected since 1956 by any Pakistan Parliament. Therefore it is the wicked secular minority lobby, who have ruined the success of Dar-ul-Islam becoming a law bidding unitary community in Pakistan. Pakistan records show Justice Manir knew the Republic's definition. Therefore Muslims must stay alert of these Secular centric academic tricksters, they are extremely sharp, they are foot soldiers of Satan, they will never mend their ways. Unless Pakistan legislators change the official Title Deed of Pakistan, we all stand collectively guilty of committing a national Shirk-e-Khafi. If you look closely at Ghamidi's silence against the practice of Usury, it amplifies his wrong priorities & motives behind his worldwide centers in the garb of Quranic teachings centers. Quran talks of gold & silver currency that holds its intrinsic values. Ghamidi failed to contribute any national effort to ban Usury. A once of gold today will buy the same level of goods or services as it did 100 years ago. On the other hand, the fiat paper currency is unstable and it's value continually decreases & the poor masses around the globe are in dire need of fairness & the capitalist are exploiting cheap labor & causing havoc on the masse disparity between Rich & Poor. he's dead silent on usury. He just wants to Hellenize naive Muslims to become under the secular sphere of influence so that secular minority can swell their numbers in Pakistan, Ghamidi has no right to manipulate naive Muslims who are the potential assets of becoming more pious servants of Lord Almighty God. The Incorrigible neoliberal secular Ghamidi bitterly slanders even the gallantry orthodoxy of Ghazali for his successfully holding back the Dujjalic Secularism onslaught on1.8 billion Muslims since the 11th century. After the 12th century, the West studied in an Islamic school in Spain but then reverted to secularism without realizing that they have ended up constructing a society prone to effeminating man's behavior & caused females to masculinize against the natural & biological reality. After carefully listening to Mr. Ghamidi's misconstrue constructions on Islamic Banking, Male Beards & Female outer-garment. I can safely repeat that all of his corrupt suggestions are fallacious & full of academic prejudice. Mr. Ghamidi sinfully denies the divine law & asserts that the law is only for Prophets pbuh wives. He is attempting to water-down Quranic Law & misleads Muslims in favor of secular ideology which constitutionally rejects the Quran & negates the successful Rightly Guided Khulafa-e-Rashideen & devalues the truthful successors of God's Messenger pbuh. Quran 33;٥٩ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَنْ يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ غَفُورًا رَحِيمًا59 O Prophet! Tell your wives, and your daughters, and the women of the believers, to drape their outer-garment over them. That is more proper, so they will be recognized and not harassed. God is Forgiving and Merciful. Quran 33;59 O Prophet, speak unto thy wives and thy daughters, (((and the wives of the true believers))), that they cast their outer garments over them when they walk abroad; this will be more proper, that they may be known to be matrons of reputation, and may not be affronted by unseemly words or actions. God is gracious and merciful. Mr. Ghamidi sinfully asserts that the above divine Order is only for Prophets PBUH wives & is not for the other Muslim women, despite, a clear express statement that commands the messenger [pbuh] to tell your wives & your daughters and women of Believers to drape [cover] themselves with outer garment when they go out. Subsequently, Mr. Javed Ghamidi is guilty of slandering the Quran of double standards. I see Mr. Ghamidi as a secular shill, acting deceitfully under their Hellenistic sphere of influence, he will lend support to Godless Western ideals, he stands carelessly, affecting to be seen of modern academic, wavering between faith & infidelity, and adhering neither unto these nor unto those: Sadly he is professionally attempting to prejudice Muslim Orthodox beliefs via Imimitaing Greek Secular ideology. This is unacceptable to any intelligent Muslim society. Pakistan Police authorities must stop wicked secular propaganda agents operating on the national media platform & the government must prosecute all NGOs who are taking foreign funding covertly to weaken Islamic values within Dar-ul-Islam Pakistan. Quran 33;36 It is not fit for a true believer of either sex when God and His Apostle have decreed a thing, that they should have the liberty of choosing a different matter of their own: and whoever is disobedient unto God and his Apostle, surely erreth with a manifest error

"Feeling of Ghamidi sb being fearful of telling truth" I mean who gives you this right to go into hearts and minds of people, you can and should only disagree with whatever your argument is, but being judgmentle in historical issues will take away your neutrality and credibility to understand the matter as it is in actuality..