he did that in cs1

Dont do that. Dont give me hope

You just described Carmel, Indiana.

You just described hell

That's Carmel, IN. It's not bad, but rush hour turns them into two way streets.

All of our hometowns

We are all in this together. 👍

In my town we just lowered the speed limit 🤷‍♀️

*USA! USA! USA!*

My guy that's all of North America

And your address is 55. "Alright be there in 36 hours"

There is a doctor who episode with this theme!

The United States Of America exists, so yes it is real.

hi

Such a good comment

hi

Literally 😂 DFW inhabitant here.

That's just regular bitcoin/nft/cryptocurrency culture

Yeah, his morals are a bit... Ambiguous.

@@GalaxiaStarslol what

Just follow the road you'll find it

Building a proper late 1800s desert town where cowboys be rootin n tootin in saloon by evening, then shootin in the street by noon

"we didn't have enough money for that, so obviously the best thing to do is... Lower the healthcare budget" yeah sounds right 😆

​@@hardy_harnigga what?

​@@AnAmericanMusicianit's a joke about the healthcare system. Pretty simple

just one more lane bro come on just do one more lane itll fix the traffic for sure this time

Yee - thanks!

Is that bluefi making the motorcycle noises? I don't know why, but I lost it at 7:28.

I thought this had some nice new things happening in the video! Love it

@@tykokavaak5784 I believe that's actually taken from a video titled 'nyoooooooooooom' by Video Dubs, more specifically the second clip sped up

I don't really like it. So hyperedited.

Is a 5-star chef. Dine-n-dashes every meal.

The Line™

Reminds me also of nearby villages. So there is a kinda-former swamp. "Former" because some monarchic regent in the 18th century saw a bunch of land he reigned over where noone lived because the ground wants to swallow you. "Kinda" because it's still very, very wet there. The earth is also still quite black. Well, the thing is, you not only have to build a road but also drainage on both sides everywhere. Like hardcore drainage. So they did that. It's villages full of one road. The largest has 2 that meet in the middle in a roundabout.

@bluefi is editor chan.

jerma

Listen here fella🫵 we do not MESS with this online writing section🙅❌ Better gorilla glue those cheeks or else ima feel DEVIOUS👾💯💯

It's not actually a quandry, and adding lanes does actually work. It's socialist disinfo that it doesn't which is based on a false concept (that the extra traffic that can end up causing the same rough time delays on a road after extra lanes are added materialises out of thin air). The issue actually isn't that adding lanes doesn't work it's that not enough lanes are added to accomodate the number of drivers who actually want to use a road, as at any point there's drivers who want to use a road but are unwilling to due to time constraints and an increase in road throughput will reduce the delay up to the point where they're willing to use it, which actually then increases the overall total delay back to roughly where it was but for any specific individual who is now using the road but who wasn't before the delay is now lower than it previously would have been. Or to put it more easy to understand, there's a road that takes 10 minutes to cross but can only fit 9 people on it, you have 10 drivers, for drivers 1-9 the journey would be 10 minutes but for driver 10 the journey would actually be 20 minutes, which is too long so he does not drive. If you add capacity for the 10th driver, then all drivers on the road now take 10 minutes so the overall delay does not seem to decrease, but the 10th driver now only has a 10 minute journey so now can drive and so has a higher quality of life.

⁠@@jimmydesouza4375I don’t think people claim it doesn’t work, they claim it doesn’t work for long, because as you point out, adding lanes makes the road more attractive and encourages more people to use it, increasing the number of people using it, thus increasing the number of lanes needed for it to be attractive, etc. often what people advocate for is the availability of higher capacity alternative modes of transport, as eventually you get to a point where the number of lanes that would be needed to accommodate the potential drivers in an area becomes impractical (just ask Texas about the Katy Freeway)

@@nabagaca No people claim it doesn't work. Also encouraging people to use it being a negative means you concede you're purposefully oppressing people for the sake of some ridiculous ideology. Sticking everyone on filthy public transport (which conveniently is completely controlled by govt). As for being impractical, everything is impractical, passenger rail is impossible to make money on so is a massive fiscal sink, busses are the same but to a lesser extent, walking and cycling limit mobility, etc. The idea that those alternate modes of transport are in any way better is conditioning. Building a mile of railway line, for example, costs approximately 100 million dollars. Absolutely impossible "theoretical minimums" are still around 40m per mile. Building a 6 lane highway costs around 5-10m per mile in rural areas and ~20m per mile in urban areas. For the same price as it takes to get a simple double track mile you can get 60 lanes of road, or 10 6 lane highways taking different routes to ease congestion that way. But you and many others are taught that you need to stuff everyone in to trains so that your mobility is controlled.

@@jimmydesouza4375how have you discovered the key that everyone else has missed - they just didn’t add lanes hard enough! Freeways as wide as a city block clearly weren’t enough, how many do we need? 2? 3? 5?

@@kaitlyn__L Look up a guy called Yuri Bezmenov and he explains how more eloquently than I could. The primary issue however is dogmatism.

I tried one way roads for neighborhood traffic. It worked out pretty well if you alternate the direction each street in the neighborhood moves.

"I know how we can fix this SoCal traffic!" *Four. Years. Later.* "Guys, I know how we can solve this traffic issue!"

I love driving (on small country roads) but same. I find it hilarious when people say “no we just didn’t add enough lanes”, given there’s places with 10 or more lanes in each direction.

@@kaitlyn__L "Car-focused" city design is driver hell, for so many reasons. And it'll get much worse with self-driving nonsense and the already-awful data privacy on modern cars getting even worse. "15-minute walkable city" conspiracy nuts think they're intended to be "open-air prisons" where you can't go more than 15 minutes away from your home without permission. Well, cars are going to become closed-air prisons if things don't change. Vehicles gaining autonomy = drivers losing autonomy. I could ramble for paragraphs about crash safety, oversized vehicles, everything being an SUV, etc., but this is already unreadable.