except for the racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia

We're being systematically divided. The Divided States of America. Sad.

you know what is also amazing? that it took so long to humans to go back to the moon. How many years? Infinite years, cause we will never go back cause... we didn´t go in the first place. Wake the fuck up. (i like your music)

@@Gozne The evidence says we did go. I remember when the moon hoax club had about three members in total. Before you were born of course.

@@richardmodglin3900 NASA destroyed the evidence and you are drunk.

@@Gozne You speak like a typical poorly mislead conspiracy theory follower that you are. No substance.....just blindly regurgitating the same crap you got from other suckers. You poor thing.

@@Gozne What's up Morty? Where'd those unintelligent comments of yours go?

117 miles as the crow flies. I know, I was in Sarasota that night (139 miles). I was thirteen. How about you?

@@tubeyerself2 yes, except that’s not what it was.

@@bradjohnston8193 I was 13 as well.

And to think to think they would have needed a rocket 1/6th the size of the Saturn 5 to get away from the moon surface. That would have been a large rocket in its own right.

@@patricksmith4424 based on what data ?

Why are the radiation belts "classified?

randy95023 It’s a shocking indictment of our educational system that basic scientific principles are so poorly understood by so many youngsters these days.

I know you wrote this comment 6 years ago but I was moved by what it said. I am a year younger than you and remember quite well the happenings of that time. the accomplishments of these people Inspired a generation worldwide, it gave kids like you and me the feeling that there was nothing we could not do if we worked really hard at it and opened our minds to the seemingly impossible .......something that has been lost in the present day.

Well. Those footages have many mistakes! Thats the problem. The "kids" of today can make click and pauses and watch and rewatch everything 1000 times. NASA "Enhanced" over 90% of the Pictures and are discrepances to the originals and posters of the 60s!!!! But Now tell me: how it is possible that the shape of the earth in min. 13:08 (between day and night border) goes in the wrong direction???? ;-) thats why no one believes this crap anymore! JFK assesination with a magic bullet, the road runner and the coyote and santa claus are out of date too!!!

@@terrypussypower It's shocking ? Give us an example of some "basic scientific principles" that are not being taught in schools.....

@Nature and Physics You can claim that with meteoerite samples. They come also from out there. USSR space programs were quite far and did not do it. I'm happy those idiots of the 60s did not destroy the planet with all their megalomaniac stupid ideas.

we aint been yet

@@bullshitdetective1 I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon.. I look forward to seeing humans go back to the Moon.. cheers from down under 👍🇳🇿🌍

@@bullshitdetective1 can you detect your own bullshit too ?

@@SpaceTime773 Maybe bullshitdetector is telling the truth

@@SpaceTime773 I would not be normal if I didn't.. everyone tells lies.. with a white lie here and a white there every where a white lie EIEIO! .. Life isn't black and white sometimes you have have to lie because you have no choice When a person lies they need to tell another lie and with Buzz Aldrin speaking about Apollo 11..his story hadn't changed.. amazing achievement 👍

Except it's not irony, that's a misuse of the word in this context.

Gosh! That's almost scary. What are the odds?

"Odds" are that these are names often used in all kinds of exploring situations.... "almost scary".....but not quite......☝🏻😨

Scriptwriting. Too bad they left out the real punchline.

Giant lies

And then you realized it was all a fraud. Peace to all the awakening ones.

So much promise, little more achieved... for now.

@@earthmancometh7416 Oh dear, yet another conspiritard.

@@phildavenport4150 strong arguments there.....🙄🙄 In fact, he is correct. The apollo missions are a giant fraud and you would agree if you bothered to scratch the surface

@@earthmancometh7416 Yo EarthMan, I remember when I could count the moonhoax club members on one hand and still have room for more. That was Long before you were born I'm sure. You are a Johnny-come-lately spewing out utter nonsense. No substance to your comment.... just denial of historic reality. Or perhaps just a troll?

That's dope

OK .

suuure you were

@@ryanmozert Cant force you to believe. I became a Shellback during the Apollo 16 mission.

@@johnvasquez4442 does Shell back mean you went a to Antarctica or something !?

Ricky Shaw I think we humans sometimes tend to throw away the still good procedures and methods togeather with the outdated.

The previous heat shields were sacrificial. That is, they would burn away in thus shed Heat. You could not use sacrificial heat shielding on the shuttle and still maintain aerodynamic stability. Unlike her proceeding space craft, this bird had to fly her way home.

Apollo used throw away, 1-time use hardware. The shuttles were an early attempt at reusable hardware. Apollo used ablative heat shields, which were covered and protected until needed, while the shuttle used a large exposed, and more fragile ceramic tile design.

randy95023 so true I was 12 during apollo 17. No cell phones and folks were just beimg able too get color tv, cable if you could afford it expanded uour channel selection from 3 too 17 channels

so easy to deceive. dumbed down pseudo-humans.

theufwik That never fails to give me goosebumps every time I watch it! Imagine sitting in the LEM looking out that window as it comes in to land! What a buzz!

Agreed with your enthusiasm. The massive SLS rocket has been in development for years and is due to launch this year, where it will take the Orion space capsule around the moon and back to Earth (for its second test in space). Expect uneducated conspiracy theorists to claim that's a hoax too :-)

Did anyone notice the camera shots someone was controlling them but only two men were on the surface so who was it as it wasn't on auto because it was pan left nd right up down zoom in zoom out sync with the astronots talking I do think they went there but a lot of actions must have been simulated for effects the hills in the background look totally fake its like there just stuck on top of the surface

@@bobbyhay4511 - From Apollo 15 onward, the Apollo TV camera was remotely controlled by Ed Fendell at mission control (Google Search: Ed Fendell Apollo). And none of it is fake, the moon is an alien environment lacking many of the cues that give us an indication of distance here on Earth, such as clouds, increased haze with distance, landmark features of known size, trees, vegetation, buildings, etc.

@@yazzamx6380 yea i do believe they were there its the amount of nonsense folkl say that makes me wonder why there's so much disbelief

@@bobbyhay4511 - No problem my friend :-)

Funny how we went to the moon with old technology and NASA has sent done nothing sense

Then it all just died. WHY? Yet how many tax dollars given to NASA? Could have helped or fed every homless American all year

@@barbibutton9619 how many tax dollars have gone to the military?

@@pan4909 I don't argue against that statement; useless wars to steal another countries resources and to take over their government s cause the US and other big countries know best and to bring in their One World Government Bush warned us about.

@@barbibutton9619 Agreed.

No, not even close.

Depends on what you mean. Yes, 1972 was the peak in aviation and space travel technology. SR71. Apollo 16 & 17. Concorde. The F14 and F15 (still today the greatest and fastest fighters ever built). But, after that, the "golden age" of aviation was over, and things started to migrate to cutting costs instead of adding function.

@@rockethead7lol ok

I was a college sophomore at FIT just south of the Cape before the launch. My buddy's father owned a Cessna 172 which was tied down at Melbourne Airport. He and I were private pilots at age 17. One night we took the airplane up the Indian River and circled just outside the restricted area, small in those days because security was not a big problem, and we flew around the Saturn V, just outside the restricted area. It had bright spotlights shining on it. From 2000 ft. we could see the huge rocket as if it were right next to us. I'll never forget that moment in my life.

daffidavit OH you lucky dog! Looking at it on TV you can tell that thing was huge 👍

​@@michaelcaron7659 Yes, I guess I was very lucky. Now you've forced me to go back and look at my old pilot logbooks. We general aviation pilots keep them dear to our hearts because of all the memories they hold. I don't think there are many people today who can claim bragging rights they "flew circles" around the Saturn V. My logbook notes that on January 25, 1971, I few a Piper PA 28-140 otherwise known as a small 4 seater Piper Cherokee from MEL (Melbourne, Fl) to "Cape Kennedy". Wikipedia indicates that Apollo 14 blasted off on January 31, 1971. So my either my memory is wrong about flying a Cessna, or I didn't log the flight for a subsequent mission, which would have been highly unlikely. Apollo 14, was the mission where Alan Shepard swung a makeshift golf club and knocked a golf ball almost into lunar orbit. LOL. However, I have a specific recollection of taking a Cessna 172 up the Indian River at night with my buddy and a few passengers to see the Saturn V with spotlights. Either my memory has failed, not surprisingly, or my logbook does not contain the flight I recall in the Cessna. Either way, I recall flying around the Saturn V from 2000 at night. I also recall on the return flight to Melbourne Airport, there was a drive-in movie theater showing movies in black and white that you would never see in any movie theater today. We pointed the airplane into the strong wind and put down the flaps and slowed it down so that we were almost standing still over the ground. We got to watch free movies from 2000 ft at a drive-in movie which I don't even know if they still use today. Yes, I was a lucky dog. Having a pilot's license as a college student back in the seventies was a very cool thing and I'm so glad I learned to fly, even if only single engines airplanes.

There were more than a few glum faces in mission control when the signal was declared lost.

lungotevere - Not much point to it.

We did. I watched the TV documentary Space 1999. It didn’t turn out too well for the moon base. 😂

If we really did all that! Space 99 and thunderbirds springs to mind 😆

we matured and realized that the moon is a wasteland just like mars and other planets.. moonlanding was communism's greatest acheivement..lol. mankind will most likey never colonize another planet. we're just too small and insignificant and space is just too vast ..

If you are still with us you know we are going back soon and eventually to Mars if you can hold on until 2035 Based on my best guess factoring in that Elon Musk likes to overpromise with deadlines lol

@@andrewmossop6547 Bet you are wrong

I believe the only time we didn't go to the moon, was the first time. And as for how to mimic 1/6 of Earth's gravity, it's called helium and another gas to cancel out the voice effect of the helium, together with their Oxygen.

so the regolith is on wires also/ / /? poor deniers, sooooooooo stupid, they don't even realise how stupid they are..just plain sad..

@@sonnypatterson9919 Idiot.

Man bring that on. And land next to one of these sites and finally shut up the hoaxers. Tinfoil shares will crash.

Boy are you gullible! Man has never been to the moon!

@@Powerful1776 Prove it

@@Ami-km8sd kzfaq.info/get/bejne/arVll7Ok2pyae6s.html and kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Ztx_i81kxrjZlY0.html

@@Powerful1776 lol

Yes, Tracy was very important to him. He adored his daughter, and would never say a darned thing to make her believe she wasn't #1 in his life. To this date, her initials are the only ones drawn into the lunar surface.

@@highlypotent do you think the {ww2 germans} would have sent men to space? Like just in general, not related to this lol (If they had existed for longer)

@@forksandpopsticles9183 For sure. Hitler had some crazy shit. Supposedly he had some kind of bell(supposed to be an UFO). you'll probably find it if you google hitler bell or hitler ufo bell or something.

Various maps, for example fra mauro's map. State there were giants in England. While the rest of the map is completly normal. Makes you wonder hue?

Your ignorance means nothing my friend, where your arguments from incredulity are irrelevant. Hence your comment is no different to the flat Earth believers I'm debating *right now* who say to me "You have to be blind to believe those photos of the Earth from space are authentic! Are you kidding me?" In what way is that evidence? :-)

*is authentic. What's the problem with it?

@@ChrisPBacon777 fake nonsense..

@@ivandelabanque1806 nope, sorry. A for effort though.

Ed Fendell

The film crew

The camera was operated by Ed Fendell. Take care.

@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthlol from earth in 1969 😂 that’s hilarious worst excuse they’ve come up with and nasa sure has some dumb ones

@@Pghgrav " from earth in 1969"...The Apollo 17 mission was in 1972. You constantly reveal how poor your basic knowledge. Also are you seriously suggesting that TV cameras, electric motors, radio waves and the means to transmit and receive them did not exist in 1972? Take care.

Not me, but many many millions believe in this lie. They are like sheep.

@@oldi184 Ah, the old sheep analogy. Say we are sheep, provide no evidence, and believe this is enough to prove your point. Hoaxers have less and less evidence now that everything has been debunked. LMFAO

Sorry, but you two are the sheep. Lost in scientific illiteracy and ignorance of history and politics.

So did they. ..

Lies make America exceptional?

@@Powerful1776 oh STFU, pathetic schizophrenic conspiracy theorist

Go fuck yourself.

Bacot, bumi itu bulat

@@musikkeras1345 This is not fake. You can watch several hours of Apollo 17 EVA footage on KZfaq. Ultimately, you can believe whatever you want to believe. However, there’s no deception here. The Apollo missions have been well documented through photos, film footage. What you are seeing is real.

What the heck are you talking about...another conspiracy nut....

You can blame politicians for that. THEY are the ones, along with the POTUS who decide the financing, and also the ones that gut, or cancel such projects. They do it time and time again.

Yes. Not only Rovers.

@Mick Ronson you're ill seek help

They can’t Because 4k quality 😉 Or HD 480 could enough to stop this fake 😂

@Mick Ronson the earth doesn't cast a shadow on the moon you fucking ignorant prick. That's not what causes the moon phases and my 7 year old cousin knows that!!!!

@Johan Bollen It doesn't really matter whether it is above or below relative to the CSM since they are virtually in the same orbit. Depending on the orientation when they separated they can drift to different spots relative to the CSM due to how orbital mechanics work. For example a small deltaV change radially inward during separation would get them below the CSM but some time later in the orbit they will be above the CSM.

@@QuietElite that makes a lot of sense. Thanks.

I was about to post at that exact time now he say that there following the one in front mut there is like 3 or 4 shadows and when the camera pans down did you see the shadow move in and move at same speed

*Took the words right out of my mouth. I was thinking, "Cheeboyguh, Cheeboyguh, Cheeboyguh.*

they did released HD pictures, not sure about the video

It lost it like NASHOLES lost the telemetry data from Apollo.

@Nature and Physics Another NASA excuse.

@Nature and Physics Stay delusional my unwoke friend. Hint: Please stay far away from fire and anything that sppears to be dangerous. By the way, no one referring to missing telemetry thinks it refers to video. Try your condescending remarks on someone else.

@Nature and Physics Nearly 60 million dollars per day for the NASA FANBOYS. ENOUGH! Even if NASA landed men on the moon; which they obviously did not, that does not help snyone on our Earth.

JimWakable yee good panoramic on the nevada desert studio's hooliwod simulation on the moon is not atmosphere wind for that's flag

JimWakable and how much air they haven in tgat bag and where is make sheet and pee in pants

He was the drummer of the band on this mission

That piece of rock he should have threw it at a 45-degree angle to see how far it would have travelled 😆 🤣 😂

I want to know who zoomed the camera into the remaining capsule on the moon?

would be more like 100-150

@Mick Ronson cry some more twat

Is a fake rock

You mean its 83 pound boulder then, how reckless of them

But there were hid military missions on the Moon after the fateful publicly Unknown APOLLO 24: meeting the frozen MONA LISA on the other side of the Moon...!

Albert Kundrat RUBBISH! Where the evidence any such missions occurred?

Javier Anderson. Well, I've heard thousands of reasons people doubt the moon landings. And, yes, one of those reasons is because nobody went back there after 1972. But, the people who use that reason to doubt Apollo was real... well... they simply have no understanding of the gigantic undertaking that it was. Nothing in human history can compare. No journey in human history was anything like it, in terms of effort and expense. There is no close 2nd place. The kids you're talking about simply cannot understand the numbers involved. But, I like to make this comparison. Climbing Mt. Everest is a massively expensive undertaking, and takes months to accomplish, and is one of the biggest journeys a person can make on Earth. How many years' worth of climbing Mt. Everest could you do before you could pay for a moon landing single seat on Apollo? The answer is that you could climb Mt. Everest every single year for about 233,000 years, before you'd pay for a single seat on an Apollo moon landing. That's longer than the human race has been in existence. THAT is how much Apollo costed. And, yeah, they pulled the funding. And, no nation since then has been willing to fork over that kind of money to put humans on the moon again.

I've never understood why not going back was considered proof of anything, other than how expensive, difficult and ultimately fruitless further missions would be without better propulsion systems. Why did we stop building Gothic cathedral or Egyptian Pyramids?

​@@rockethead7 the cost of the war in vietnam that same year ( 1969 ) was the equivalent of the entire apollo program so there is a close second and even a 1rst. Try to imagine that.

Nebraska214 Eugene Cernan and his crew member slept on the moon for three days, and three nights. I wonder what it was like to sleep there.

Are you for real?

@@oldnic yes, he is, because he respects people who risked their lives to advance our scientific knowledge. What have you done with your life?

@@ct92404 you are very dim to believe such nonsense...

@@oldnic So you're one of those nutjob conspiracy theorists? Yeah, you're the dim one. I'm sure you also believe the Earth is flat and Bigfoot is real.

Oh, look at the flat earther. Pissed off because some people actually understood math and other hard things.

@@kitcanyon658what are you watching? Are you not watching the same fake bs we are?

@@Pghgrav : Let me guess, you're proud of not going to college, right?

(or goes for the first time.)

oldii184 - A Wart On the Ass of Humanity

+Paul Rogers because they used the weather ballons of Roswell, that`s help alot..... FKING LIARS

+Paul Rogers Apollo 11 used the Hasselblad 500 EL camera with preset iris and exposure settings. Apollo 17 use the Hasselblad 70mm electric camera. It used different lenses and iris and exposure settings.

Attention all anti-NASA conspiraturds Get this through your thick skulls. I do not have any respect for you, or anything you have to say. I am not engaging in pointless discussions with you, or answering any of your dumb arse questions. Stop pretending you are serious persons, interested in evidence or real answers. You are only pathetic msheeple.

Sorry was the question to technical for you? Read it slower, that might help.

That was for you Harold.

Agreed. People who think that Apollo was a big hoax and don't understand the science behind it seem to be more numerous than ever.

maybe because.. it is real? Just because you don't understand everything that went into it doesn't mean it's fake. It's called ignorance.

Are there people that watch the 1/6 gravity effects and think - yep, they could pull that off in 1970 LMFAO

Thats cgi i think

@@forksandpopsticles9183 thank u

@@forksandpopsticles9183 CGI in 1972??

True...and not only U.S., but Russia, China and India as well. It's just that we were the ones that did it with humans multiple times, and so far no other country has duplicated that feat. That's quite a conspiracy for four countries to keep over 50 years. Or, just maybe, the truth is quite simply that WE (humanity) did go there...but that's not sexy and self-validating enough for some people's egos, i guess.

@@christophermacintyre5890 ::: True, but the historical basis for man on the moon really belongs to the German scientist who developed the V1 and V2 rockets that bombed France and England. The German scientist that came to USA not to Russia are the one ones who help further USA's development of the Rocket. German's were already ahead on Jet engine technology which USA was behind, and Russia further behind USA. Russia developed Rocket technology with help of the German Scientist who were employed with Russia. German and USA were already in the works of building the Atomic Bomb which Germany already had the technical advance over Russia and USA, but due to USA's and Russia's continuing bombing of the Nazi Factory's the German's could not further develop their technology to build the Rockets or the Atomic Bomb. So in reality back to the Man on the Moon achievement, it really belongs to German scientist, but the freedom of USA help further that peaceful achieve from the hardship of WAR. You are welcome to research what I have to say through your own time.

Yes, I am aware of the German rocket program and Operation Paperclip.

@@christophermacintyre5890 ::: I am not aware of Operation Paperclip, thanks for the info.

@@andrewtoombs3867 Nobody should ever forget the work done by von Braun and the other German rocket scientists/engineers from WWII 20 years prior. But, make no mistake about it, the USA would have gotten the job done without them. 450,000 people worked on Apollo. A vast majority were NOT WWII Germans. The development of the lander, the development of the command module, the development of the suits, the development of the computers, etc., was all done by American companies. And, it's not like we didn't have good rocket scientists/engineers. The problems with the F1 engines were solved by the American engineers. The weight issues were solved by American engineers. And, yes, they'd have built the Saturn V with or without the Germans. Again, I'm not saying this to dismiss their roles, or to say that I don't appreciate what they contributed. But, sorry, I do not agree that the accomplishment of landing men on the moon "belongs to German scientists."

This documentary was produced in 1973.

@@rockethead7 Still makes no sense. Any documentary about anything states the year the events occurred, not when the doc was made.

@@tomcameron96 Wrong.

@@rockethead7 Yes you are wrong.

@@tomcameron96 Riiiiighttt. This video got the year wrong of the Apollo missions. And, no, it's not because it's standard to post the year the documentary was made, but they were sooooo stupid, that they got the year wrong, and YOU are right. Good gods, KZfaq is full of morons.

www.aulis.com/imagesfurther/15-86-11670print.jpg

one sixth the size of the moon.

+Daclaem Toth... I agree, there always seems to be plenty of money to spend on armaments for war, death and destruction, and only a minuscule amount of spending in comparison for space exploration and the future of mankind, I know what I would prefer to pay my government taxes for!

Hope we can go back up there. These problems will always exist, but as long as the sky is blue and the Earth continues to rotate, there's still a future.

Not in the budget..lol ...lol

lol 😂😂😂😂

yuh

Do you believe we never landed in the moon!?

@@cooljackster7390 yes.... and Elvis is still Alive, and living as preacher man Bob Joyce in Benton/Arkansas. ❤️❤️❤️❤️😎👍

@@cooljackster7390 not in the Moon(on the Moon).👍❤️😎

You believe trash theory conspiracy like a sheep

OHHH there's BIGGER ONES OUT THERE!!

YOU SAID: "why if i accelerate the video, for ex in 2X, the people on the "moon" moves like in the earth!!!" == Well, that's not true if you watch all of the footage. But, yes, generally speaking, that's just how the physics/math works out. And, if they went to a place with more gravity, you'd have to slow it down to seem like Earth. There will always be a multiplier, from planet to planet, moon to moon, where you can speed it up or slow it down and it'll look like the gravity on Earth. It's just basic physics. YOU SAID: "even when they kick the dust!! looks like a normal gravity." == Except, it doesn't. On Earth, dust would be affected by the air around it, linger, spread differently, etc. But, on the moon, with no air, each dust particle follows the same arc as any thrown rock. YOU SAID: "What happened with the camera on the moon!!! Why they filmed very good when they was at the houston center, and the camera on the moon looks like 8mm cam?" == There were two video cameras taken to the moon on Apollo 17. One was the RCA sequential field scan TV camera with 200 lines of resolution. It was mounted to the rover and controlled from Houston. It provided a near-live video feed back to Houston. The other was a 16mm hand-held film camera. It could also be mounted to the rover directly behind the RCA camera, or could be mounted to the LMP window inside the LEM. Being a film camera, the quality was better than the TV camera. But, they needed to wait to get back home before developing the film. YOU SAID: "When the apollo left the moon, why they did not use rockets!!!." == Are you insane? Of course they used rockets. How else do you think they propelled the craft, if not by rockets? You are probably confused simply because N2O4 and Aerozine 50 (the oxidizer and fuel combination) burn clear, almost invisible.

@@rockethead7 thanks 4 answer everything

The Apollo 17 flight was in 1972, however, this documentary was completed and copyrighted in 1973.