When you lost 100% of your brain

@@ohdamm6222 what is your thoughts about kashmir pandit genocide

Look the history of Assyrians and see how brutal they once were until they accepted Christianity, after which Ottomans carried out their genocide and wiped out 90% of their population just like Armenians and occupied their lands which today consists of Northeastern Syria and Northwestern Iraq (today part of Kurdistan). Btw, Kurds were also involved in the Assyrian/Armenian genocide in 1915 and then the modern Turks turned against them and have a new tussle today with Turkey + Iran vs Kurds ! Middle East was funny.

Yes

@@ohdamm6222 Do accept Muhammad marrying a child, the same age as his daughter Fatima ? Would you allow your sister to get married by 12-14 to a 52 year old man ? And if you say those were old times, then exactly, that is what my point is - those were the old times and Islamic rules are obsolete and make no sense in modern world. Should be modified exactly how the Chinese Communist Party did or wiped out like how Soviets did !!

❤ ..

A blind person 💀

@@sonofuniverse6355 His heart and eyes both are blind then 😔😔

@@ishansrivastava6791 don't say like that. We are bhakt and it's very important for us that how we present ourselves because through us people will know what geeta or shri krishna or bhakti is 🤗

@@sonofuniverse6355 thank you , you made me realise my fault. Hare kṛṣṇa , Prabhu ji/mata ji 🦚🙏🏻💗 All glories to srila Prabhupada 🦚🙏🏻 Gaurhari🦚 Hari bol 🙌🏻

Mongols : 💀

@@RkRk-xu1ww battle of ain jalut😶

​@@RkRk-xu1wwberke khan

allah kalapanik hai

@@kambojexpress6230 okay 👍

Right

Yes

NAK(Nouman Ali Khan) is also good

& mullah omar plus baghdadi also

@@ulala9729 wo tmlg k lye hai bhai

atheism is actually better than blindly believing in god... hinduism prefers agnosticism.. we have to explore the path

what a innocent retard you are go convert to chuslam , one who were questioned about isl@m in the past were executed or killed with no mercy have you heard of the story of hakikathray who was a kid was executed for questioning about chuslam bottomline is no matter who questions will be killed or read about asma bint marwan who was murdered because of her poetry about the massacre conduct by Muhammad just don't blindly praise terr0rism

Dharma allows us to think and explore not just blindly follow thats the beauty of dharma

@Hindu Veer Chauharmal that's not true they do have caste system they do have lower case they don't build relationships with each other for all of them only one common think is Qur'an it teaches only religion people just blindly follow no body should question

@@PR-mh3jd exactly think.. About what our religious books teach us, all the stories and then analyse everything. And then my friend you'll have no doubts..

that's why the video is pre muhammad arabia

There were so many influential humans but since there's no recorded history we don't know. To Call a learned man's points as half baked knowledge... It Doesnt seem right. He is well known and has credentials, none of us know about you. So in common people's eyes you are the ignorant biased person and not him.

Exactly

What part of pre Islamic Arabia confuses you?

@@ANK3555 boss learn English first:)

lol mercy yahan curse. history padh lo bhai abhramic religion se pehle ki aur abhramic religion k baad ki.

@@dumdumdumdum8804 It's better with Abrahamic religions.

​@@silentbyte196 unless you are an serial rapist or an psychopath murderer, you would say this.

​@@silentbyte196islam is not an abrahamic religion ,it's from qureshi tribal culture

@@v.j9579 If you actually study the religion then you will see that Islam was against the many tribal customs prevailing at that time (which is why Muhammad peace be upon him was hated by the Qureshi pagans) And also Islam was against their paganism. Islam is much, much closer to Christianity and Judaism in terms of theology than to pagan arab traditions.

True.. Dasas were people voluntarily serving not forced to labor like slaves.

Never expect any marxist historian to praise your culture.

This guest is wrong in so many factual things

Rulers of thiruvithamkoor ( Kerala' ) called themselves "dasa of Lord SreePadmanabha"

@@ashyjager what can you more accept from a person who believes in aasamani kitaab 😂

I suppose would it not be good for you to do some meaningful work in life rather than waste your time doing nothing except listen arguments which gives fodder to your gossips. 😒😒😒

​@@Neutral_Mind living an successful immoral life is meaningless life brother...why should someone choose immorality even if it gives you a sense of achievement

Why are every pajeeet open their mouth without knowledge....I swear someday you will get humiliate so Hard.....

​@@MohmmadHanief-ij4vkWhy don't you humiliate him now with your knowledge

​@@Prat2023what knowledge 😂

The jiziya implemented on non muslims and muslims were need to pay zakat another form of tax..

You're lying, it didn't started in 7th century, it started in 16th century By Shia empire Safavid Dynasty and not Only Zoroastrians, they even kill 20,000 Sunni Muslims

❤

Ya nabi allah ya syed ul mursaleen ❤️❤️❤️❤️

​@@farazkhan9844he is cursed

​@@KZfaqsohokya bey

​@@farazkhan9844 😂😂

Das is servant

@@induchopra3014 It's not just servant, it has a deeper meaning than just servant, which means an employee. Das (broadly) is someone who is with their "lord" regardless of payment.

@@624raje But people in those days used Das as a slave nothing more than that. And yes It would totally depend on the kings of that time if they used to pay or not. It's not like any of us have lived in that era. Das or Dasi concept was used for people who did servant work at that time sometimes they used to get respect sometimes not, just like in today's era. If you read more scriptures of brutal or harsh king's story u will definitely find it.

@@swarnachoudhary9700 Equating Das with Slave is incorrect. Indian culture did not have slaves, there's no record of slave trades in Bharat it's a concept come from the Mediterranean region. Das and Sevak too were different divisions Das has a spiritual connection. My point is the person who equated Das as Slave is grossly inaccurate.

Correct

thats your opinion but ok

@@cesaadia1737 that's not just my opinion but that's the truth

Doesn't matter what u think

Exactly - what else do you expect from the followers of a book that is infamous for being the epitome of bigotry and regression.

@@afifahossain5717 yes, it does because times have changed. Now, we're not fringe elements. More and more people are now realising the truth.

True brother.

He doesn't even know the name daughter of hubal (laat,mannat and uzza) and he called as islamic expert what a joke.

@@MYLIFEMYRULEZ definitely not ex hindu

@@yatishyelgulwar6597 do you have problems with me for ex hindu

True bro walikumasalam

They were service provider, they were paid Megasthenes in 300 BCE said that India weirdly didn't had any slaves unlike Greece and other kingdoms

@@indianchad3936 calling Buddhist religion promotors as missionaries. Calling indian dasa as slaves are wrong. These terms paints them and the west/ middle eastern missionaries and slaves with the same brush. There should be a different word

@KZfaq Studio: The concept of Slave was alien to ancient Hindus until Muslim invasions. Keeping someone as a slave is a totally Adharmic act in Hindu dharma.

Then what about Devadasi culture,The Cursed CASTE System,even propagated by Adi Shankara,etc. We can't always claim as if our culture is without imperfections or practices deemed absolutely unacceptable today,ie the practice of Sati,put to a halt by the British. In fact,down south ( especially in Kanyakumari region) the much abhorred " breast tax" was imposed on the lower caste woman by the "Elders or Leaders" of the villages in order to be allowed to cover their breasts.

@@guhapooinpatarsan2853understand the difference between what the original commenter said and the shit you spew, stop your “what about” fool

Then u learn nothing 🤣🤣🤣

Aye convert karane 😂😂

Welcome Islam🥰🥰🥰

🤣😂😛

​ I don't see you there

Converts think themselves of true momins than Arabs themselves. 🤣

The original inhabitants were made servants.

@@alani3992 lollipop

@@alani3992 😂😂

@@alani3992 Golgappe Khayega?

What about Untouchability within ur religion ???

Yes towards terrorism

Funny 😂

To hell

Rationality is the only straight path.

Bhai ye word iska nhi hai ye Qur'an ka verse hai or Islam hi Sacha hai Allah ne Jo kaha hai wo jarur pura karega Jo galat karega usko jahanum mai Allah dalega or Jo nek insan hoga jo Allah ke huqm mai apna zindagi guzartahoga usko jannat milega

progressive is a term used by those who focus on industrialism. This means everyone should work for money. Islam tells us that women should focus on their main objective for society which is to look after the family and raise good children. If there is time and space to earn money by fulfilling that main objective then there is no problem in doing so. Such as Khadija was a widow when she was doing business. This is what they are naturally inclined to do. On the other hand, the so-called progressive community tells us to send our women to work 9-5 and serve the boos who have no responsibility for that woman. Now I know this view is pushed by the West and media so much that you guys think whoever thinks differently from it is mad. But hear me out, the majority doesn't win the truth. You need to think critically to consider something wrong. You might be brain-dead to consider that pre-Islamic Arabia was better than the Islamic Golden Age 😒

whether he loves you will depend on whether u are 9

​@@MegaMonamyMy Man cooked and digsetsz abdool .😭

arabian slalved ahhahaha

Not big difference

@@Taufik-oi8tr wxcept das gets his own room minimal facilities a good pay as per his abilities and protection by the law of the empire

@@Taufik-oi8tr There is, one is only servant as long as their skill set remain inferior. By this guy's logic even a construction worker or a safai karamchari is a slave😂

Let's read Manu Smriti....

they can be both

Seethe and cope hindu

middle east was under hindu influence in the past

WHEN JESUS COMES THE SEASONS WILL MIX IVE BEEN HERE 20 YEAR IT STARTED WITH KATRINA . ISLAM WILL BE DEFEATED ITS SATAN SORRY... JESUS

@@hke.4475 Seethe and cope! Why! Bad omen is bad omen. While it may hurt u but truth can’t be hidden. Millions of ppl have died of this cursed child. He was badluck for his parents, family and well as for humanity.

@@r.b.8018 Read about him before you say anything.. 😊

I think Jews were traders so they knew about the world and what was happening all around because they used to trade. Right, Vedas and Upanishads do pre date all other scriptures but I think torahs have like the second timeline? But they like to think that torahs came before the Vedas, which is weird and curse worthy too 🤡

Bro it is Qur'an kindly make it right.

Then it's Veda Samhita and Upanishad Samhita, samhita means written version while it is the sounds that are holy

He said Jews were advance because they knew agriculture, jewellery making and weapon making.

How old are Vedas according to U ??? Is it a few hundred years as we know but Bhakts can have different unimaginable numbers though 😂😂😂

It is not confirmed!

Servant means slave and nokar indirectly slave only

@@followislam680 slave don't get paid

@@followislam680 prime minister is servant also ...even Hanuman ji is known as ram das ...

@@followislam680 naukar Matlab slave nahi hota.

It is common knowledge that devDasis were used as SexSLAVES...

Dange karwaoge kya :D

​@@ayushsubedi6445😂😂

​@@ayushsubedi6445dange hi to chhahti sarkaar election arahe hai ram mandir udghaatan ke bahane bhadkau bhashan shuru hone wale hain musalmaan bhiyo satark rehna😢

North pole south pole

propagandist vs propagandist?

😆

True

Yap 😂😂u noticed

May be he is scared of the " tolerant community" .🤣🤣🤣

Bhakt ☕

K2a

@@sycrox5201bh2a

A pedophile can't be a prophet of holy god

​@@sycrox5201tanatan drum 🥁

@@farhanakhtar7446 chuslam

Ali dawah and hijab are most rudest dawah person.

@@uttam_k766 They are not rude, they speak in English the way they speak in speed and whatever is rude for you, but they are not.

Exactly, Tuaha and Muhammad Hijab ❤

Student of jihadi preacher israr Ahmad

We ain't interested in knowing abt moHha med a nism.. We know enough of it by it's conquest, peaceful organisation like isis, Al-Qaeda etc.. Also we know abt Character of Muhammad..

True invite him if possible

Scholars and Islam? Strange bedfellows.

@@holywarrior5719 inn logo ki kabra kholne ke liye books hi padh lo inki apne aap line par aa jaayenge. Mene isi chakkar me quran padh li.

Like Alhamdulillah properly

@@shaggy5194 thank you brother

Can we call ExMuslim Movement guys like ExMuslim Sahil, ExMuslim Sameer, ExMuslim Adam Seeker?

@@GoodTimesAhead27 sorry bro we have to promote Islam not humanity✌️

How about taliban? They have maximum of your preachers 😂😂😂

Ya, one should also start calling ex hindus, since they can also give a better perspective of Sanaatan Dharma instead of scholars or pandits who actually follow their faith and have studied the hindu scriptures their whole life..

Ex muslim bro he even doesnt know how many times muslim prays a day . Lol he just like other kufar disrespecting the mighty islam

​@@SweetChilly0410sure why not then you will find out that the how people can interpret things according to them

Keep dreaming, why can’t invite Saeed George, he will deep about Islam 😂

​@@SweetChilly0410sure 😊

Bro follow Islam

Then you followed wrong Islam ,peace is only in islam

Share your queries so that we ll help u

Then you may not be following it perfectly😊

Because you are following your nafs. Follow Quran and you find peace in islam

What about Muslims who talk shit about our gods and way of life.

Come on u guys are shitting all around the world atleast leave the internet for us.

Bcoz he is from godi gober community

@@amolsonawane1476 to done me difference kya hua

Atleast we don't spread Terrorism.

Kuch Bhi Ho par Tm log converted ho. Islam Kaisa faila hai Bharat me sabko Pata hai

Prophet adam lolllll bruh he belongs to bible stop claiming anyone for the sake of your religion islam is a cult not a religion which was started 1400 years ago

​@@dripler4033When you got 0 knowledge :

@@Historyteller346 womp womp

Did Adam recited shahda, did Adam recite namaaz 5 times a day, did Adam and other prophets believe in Tauheed, did Adam use to go to haj??

It will be very kind of you to keep to yourself and not say more about it .

@@subratadas8408 Why so intolerant? How on earth did this offend you? And who are you?? Who are you to tell me not to do so?

@@sreyanshuchaterjee3962 Do you even know the meaning of Kaafir? Trying to act like a lecturer and don't even understand a simple word.

@@believersince_1997 im truly curious about what kaafir means for real ?

One who don't follow any religion is termed as kafir a disbeliever usually who don't follow Islam is termed as non Muslim but the thing start from here like see i am muslim you are non Muslim i don't have to tell you that you are kafir bcoz your are following sanatan dharam whether your worship shiv Ram hunuman Krishna as mentioned in your books .but in whole the whole world who are following Islam k/as one ummah of prophet Mohammad saw we pray as the basic 5 things in Islam are sahada paryer fasting zakat means tax hajj compulsory for wealthy muslim these things are compulsory and Qur'an the holy book and the hadees which is the saying of prophet Mohammad saw moreover the non Muslim which are living in this world is also the ummat of mohhamad saw the prophet but they are termed as ummat e dawat means we as a Muslim have to tell them about Islam it is our duty that's why you see maximum preacher doing this the basic thing is that on the day of judgement every one will be ask about his deeds and doing and like if i have a non Muslim frnd i have to tell him that this is Islam and the things which comes under it rest is upto his if we want to follow it is his choice .hope you get the answer

YES

Gang's rape's set fire on women's everyday in India

I suppose would it not be good for you to do some meaningful work in life rather than waste your time doing nothing except listen arguments which gives fodder to your gossips. 😒😒😒

​​@@Neutral_Mind We're learning only for the sake of learning. Not for gossip. Maybe some people do that, but not all. Everyone's a pacifist when they don't know stuff.

Mr you watch this KZfaqrs 1) awaz Haq 2) Sam stoolane 3) qaiser raja 4) mufti yaseer Nadeem alwajidi 5 )Zaid Patel 6) Eliana Ali 7) irpc India 8 ) abuzor respond

The Prophet said, "Isn't the witness of a women equal to half that of a man?" The women said "yes". He said "This is because of the deficiency of the women's mind." Sahih Bukhari 3:48:826

@Bhavani Singh misleaded person please study it then u know what actually written in there please study before telling something don't tell anything like andbhakt

@Bhavani Singh and why Krishna marriage with 16k girl it is right

@@rakibulhussain_078 who is maria quibtia

@Bhavani Singh Surah Al azab 33:36 36. And it becometh not a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and His messenger have decided an affair (for them), that they should (after that) claim any say in their affair; and whoso is rebellious to Allah and His messenger, he verily goeth astray in error manifest. Surah Al Azab 33:37 And when thou saidst unto him on whom Allah hath conferred favour and thou hast conferred favour: Keep thy wife to thyself, and fear Allah. And thou didst hide in thy mind that which Allah was to bring to light, and thou didst fear mankind whereas Allah hath a better right that thou shouldst fear Him. So when Zeyd had performed that necessary formality (of divorce) from her, We gave her unto thee in marriage, so that (henceforth) there may be no sin for believers in respect of wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have performed the necessary formality (of release) from them. The commandment of Allah must be fulfilled.

People accepted Islam in Arabia after seeing the great influence of Islam. No one forced anyone. That's the reason Jews and Christians co-existed with the Muslims. It's a pretty bad assumption to think negatively about the topic without knowing that most people accept Islam due to its practicality and easy-to-understand nature.

​@@imran98Tyou're wrong about history, Islam spread in Arabia basically killing and submit the Arab tribes. Mohamed and the first Umma comumity were desert raiders, nothing more.

@@Stradastorts57 Yo, you jumped from a topic to a whole different topic. I don't speak out of knowledge because that is one of the biggest things God has warned us about. If you wanna know the right thing pick up a book about the Prophet (saw) and his influence in Arabia. There are tons of Non-muslim authors for that. Like “Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet” by Karen Armstrong. Why don't read what Ghandi had to say about our Prophet (saw)? These people are not script readers like the media.

@@imran98T The influece of Mohamed were created two century after born of islamic religion in IX century and exalted the horrible action Mohamed did against innocent people. I don't follow what many non muslims say about Mohamed (there is many non muslims who spoke against Islam and what Mohamed did), and i know that Gandhi in his speech try to save India from Partition, who created so many problems that we see today.

@@Stradastorts57 Then research on your own if you are so close-minded to dive deeply into it. A man who had control of a whole state had to deal with wars. Who said it was innocent deliberately? Godi Media? Funded Ex-Muslims? Then you should be ashamed of your knowledge. Ask any non-Muslim historian who knows the context very well. Then come to me. Ask any religious Jews about the history of the Muslims. Because this is also seen negatively in the media.

Acha vo aapke papa hein

It was dilpomatic and not really accurate. Das does not mean a slave..this guy was scared to call a spade a spade

What about devdasi pratha

​@@indiancitizen4715 Devdasi was not someone who was serving Human, they served their life to the Deity. They did not get involved in any other norms of society. In case you want an example, you can imagine how Sufis are to Sufism, they just pray to god and nothing else

​@@indiancitizen4715 devdasi mean who is a devoted to dev (god) dasi in India when God come in human we called dasi has come in her body it refer God in sanskrit

Ashok killed lot of people, nobody complains about that, where are children of those dead people, they were later killed by Brahmins, now they are nowhere around to complain about Ashok, atleast Hindus were not touched, so now they can now complain

There is no historical record of islam before 7th century

I see ok. Jai shri ram

@@jogdeepak you will see ALLAH HU AKBAR

@@jogdeepak But Sri Ram is just a king Na as per historical data But not creator of the universe

@@PavitShokeen8 Saley tumlog Ka pata nahi Problem kya hai Khud ka dharm ek dam kalpanik Fictitious fake hai dusron ko gnan derain Ache insan bano ache hindu Banke bhi koyi fayeda nahi hai Kyun tumhara dharm Ek bada fake hai kahaniyon wala Valmiki ki

@Pavit Shokeen Allah knows best ,and those who reject the truth their heart knows they are in loss , knowledge is power

Nikl yha se😂

Naik is another convert who try to convert others this is his life

As a Kafir, I dont know what to make of your statement as I will go to jahanum anyways,.

​@@sreyanshuchaterjee3962 😂

Inshallah Peace be upon him 😂

Actually all his shows are scripted... And waht he says are pre revised by him before the show..who will ask questions, and what will be the question all are set.. And the conversion is also a fake conversion... It ahave many proof on youtube ansd revealed by jokers personal bodyguard

@@surajmishra5226 rip upon him bro

zakir naik barbaad jaye

😂😂😂

Kalank of Gujarat. Just like Jinnah

I suppose would it not be good for you to do some meaningful work in life rather than waste your time doing nothing except listen arguments which gives fodder to your gossips. 😒😒😒

@@Neutral_Mind aren't you doing the same? Take your own advice and leave

@@achalsoni4769 yes of course. Ladies first. 😜😜😜

@@Neutral_Mind so why aren't you leaving?🤷🏼‍♂️

What about the Christian crusades and britishers talking bout history

@@ChanChan-ix3rp what about them?

Yeah and mongols and crusaders also destroyed islamic books and tried to destroy culture, many hindu kings did same with buddhists , u can’t point out one religion or community for certain things happened in history ,

@@altu4908 which Hindu king destroyed Buddhist culture?

@@Murga_Mutton pushyamitra shunga , Shaivite king Shashanka , kshemagupta , son of ashoka Jalauka , destruction of a monumental cave-temple in Vidarbha etc .these are just examples or cruelty against buddhism , there was always discrimination against jains and buddhists , jains were gotten killed just for being jain. No religion allows this , but political needs and human behaviour did.

adam seeker will tell you in detail about this just go to his channel

​@@vidhirajak2464Adam seeker first spits on Hinduism and your pagan gods. First defend them. Islam tou bht badi aud dur ki cheez h. We have seen such seekers throughout our history. They came and vanished by Islam was there, is there and will be there. Allah u Akbar.

@@mohammadshafaq8919 🤣🤣

allah hu akabar kabooom boommmmmmmmmm

@@sivbay Gay Shree Ra*.. (Mob Lynched)

Atheist is better

islam

*Sword

Peace be upon him ❤❤

What aspect of Islam want you to show Ranveer here?? Just listen, no one is interested in knowing any aspect of Islam.. For a non-muslim like me.. The only & real aspect of Islam is what I see the Muslims doing around me.. That is TERRORISM.😒😏

true essence ke liye hi isey bulaya tha.. he is scared for his life to speak

Not interested

@@parthch1 chad jaat 😂😂👍🙌

Rangeela Rasool?

Islamic scholars or radical extremists

All religions have flaws ... If any one can't accept.. we are brain washed

​@@Yoursinsaremelook at the confidence you have in your religion. Most of you are using bad language and trying to avoid gaining knowledge about Islam

@@majiduddinmohd8696 what knowledge please explain???

@@Yoursinsareme history of Islam. Why do you use abusive words. Don't you fear God? We Muslim fear God.

I suppose would it not be good for you to do some meaningful work in life rather than waste your time doing nothing except listen arguments which gives fodder to your gossips. 😒😒😒

Nabi-55, @yesha-6 😍😍

@@kaushikchakraborty2271 abe gobar bhakt 6 saal ki seeta thi raam 25:saal ke the aunphad apni khutibe khol kr bta raha h nhi h yakeen to awazehaq channel kgf dekhle ja kr 😅😅😅

@@kaushikchakraborty2271 Hazrat Aisha’s age This hadith cannot be true for several reasons. First, the Prophet could not have gone against the Quran to marry a physically and intellectually immature child. Secondly, the age of Hazrat Aisha can be easily calculated from the age of her elder sister Hazrat Asma who was 10 years older than Hazrat Aisha. Waliuddin Muhammad Abdullah Al-Khateeb al Amri Tabrizi the famous author of Mishkath, in his biography of narrators (Asma ur Rijal), writes that Hazrat Asma died in the year 73 Hijri at the age of 100, ten or twelve days after the martyrdom of her son Abdullah Ibn Zubair. It is common knowledge that the Islamic calendar starts from the year of the Hijrah or the Prophet’s migration from Mecca to Medina. Therefore, by deducting 73, the year of Hazrat Asma’s death, from 100, her age at that time, we can easily conclude that she was 27 years old during Hijra.This puts the age of Hazrat Aisha at 17 during the same period. As all biographers of the Prophet agree that he consummated his marriage with Hazrat Aisha in the year 2 Hijri it can be conclusively said that she was 19 at that time and not nine as alleged in the aforementioned hadiths.

@@sunstone657 । कुरान 33:59, हे पैगंबर! अपनी पत्नियों और अपनी बेटियों और ईमान वालों की पत्नियों से कह दो: "तुम्हारे बाहरी वस्त्र जो तुम पहनती हो उन्हें अपने ऊपर ढीले लटका रहने दो, ताकि तुम्हारे शरीर असंबंधित पुरुषों पर प्रकट न हों।" यह उन्हें स्वतंत्र महिलाओं के रूप में अलग करने की अधिक संभावना है ताकि वे नौकर लड़कियों की तरह उत्पीड़न के अधीन न हों। मतलब गैर मुस्लिम (काफिर) की औरतों और लड़कियों को रेप किया जा सकता है और मारा भी जा सकता है। अल्लाह शैतान कुरान 4:24 में गैर-मुस्लिम महिलाओं और लड़कियों को बलात्कार करने का आदेश देता है, गैर-मुस्लिम कुफ़र (मुशर्कीन) की महिलाओं और लड़कियों को जिन्हें मुसलमान पकड़ते हैं, उन्हें सैक्स गुलाम के रूप में इस्तेमाल किया जा सकता है, यह आपके लिए अल्लाह का फरमान है। अंत में हम समझ सकते हैं कि शैतान की कितनी गंदी पंथ और असली नज़ाज़ अल्लाह अल मकीर निर्णायक है

@@yashguptajaz70 thoda gyaan ki kami hai apmey

What bullshit you talk

As an Ex hindu Nice Joke 😂😂😂

Say this too arabs Or ppl of saudi Arabia........ Bhai u r grt to share this pc of information

@@arzooruhishaikh great my ass. I can quote 100 such verses from the Vedas and Geeta saying exactly what Islam says about god, idol worship and prophets. These sanghis cannot be believed

First ancient text is rig Veda everything comes much later madam

You had slaves...

​@@Historyteller346Evidence de Maadri

@@andreiyevanovYou want evidence ? Here it is : The earliest surviving South Asian epigraphy, the mid 3rd Century BCE, Edicts of Ashoka, in Greek, Aramaic and Prakrit, independently identify obligations to slaves and hired workers, later prohibiting the trading of Slaves within the Empire. Dāsa are offered in examples of Pāṇini's, probably mid 4th century BCE, Sanskrit grammar, the Aṣṭādhyāyī, e.g. 2.3.69 "lusting for the slave", 2.4.24 "the concourse of ladies and slaves". The term dāsa and dāsyu in Vedic and other ancient Indian literature has been interpreted by as "servant" or "slave", but others have contested such meaning. The term dāsa in the Rigveda, has been also been translated as an enemy, but overall the identity of this term remains unclear and disputed among scholars. According to Scott Levi, it was likely an established institution in ancient India by the start of the common era based on texts such as the Arthashastra, the Manusmriti and the Mahabharata. Slavery was "likely widespread by the lifetime of the Buddha and perhaps even as far back as the Vedic period", however he elaborates that the association of the Vedic Dasa with 'slaves' is "problematic and likely to have been a later development". Upinder Singh states that the Rig Veda is familiar with slavery, referring to enslavement in course of war or as a result of debt. She states that the use of dasa and dasi in later times were used as terms for male and female slaves. In contrast, Suvira Jaiswal states that dasa tribes were integrated in the lineage system of Vedic traditions, wherein dasi putras could rise to the status of priests, warriors and chiefs as shown by the examples of Kaksivant Ausija, Balbutha, Taruksa, Divodasa and others. Some scholars contest the earlier interpretations of the term dasa as "slave", with or without "racial distinctions". According to Indologists Stephanie W. Jamison and Joel P. Brereton, known for their recent translation of the Rigveda, the dasa and dasyu are human and non-human beings who are enemies of Arya. These according to the Rigveda, state Jamison and Brereton, are destroyed by the Vedic deity Indra. The interpretation of "dasas as slaves" in the Vedic era is contradicted by hymns such as 2.12 and 8.46 that describe "wealthy dasas" who charitably give away their wealth. Similarly, state Jamison and Brereton, the "racial distinctions" are not justified by the evidence. According to the Indologist Thomas Trautmann, the relationship between the Arya and Dasa appears only in two verses of the Rigveda, is vague and unexpected since the Dasa were "in some ways more economically advanced" than the Arya according to the textual evidence. According to Asko Parpola, the term dasa in ancient Indian texts has proto-Saka roots, where dasa or daha simply means "man". Both "dasa" and "dasyu" are uncommon in Indo-Iranian languages (including Sanskrit and Pali), and these words may be a legacy of the PIE root "*dens-", and the word "saka" may have evolved from "dasa", states Parpola. According to Micheline Ishay - a professor of human rights studies and sociology, the term "dasa" can be "translated as slave". The institution represented unfree labor with fewer rights, but "the supposed slavery in [ancient] India was of mild character and limited extent" like Babylonian and Hebrew slavery, in contrast to the Hellenic world. The "unfree labor" could be of two types in ancient India: the underadsatva and the ahitaka, states Ishay. A person in distress could pledge themselves for work leading to underadsatava, while under ahitaka a person's "unfree labor" was pledged or mortgaged against a debt or ransom when captured during a war. These forms of slavery limited the duration of "unfree labor" and such a slave had rights to their property and could pass their property to their kin, states Ishay. The term dasa appears in early Buddhist texts, a term scholars variously interpret as servant or slave. Buddhist manuscripts also mention kapyari, which scholars have translated as a legally bonded servant (slave). According to Gregory Schopen, in the Mahaviharin Vinaya, the Buddha says that a community of monks may accept dasa for repairs and other routine chores. Later, the same Buddhist text states that the Buddha approved the use of kalpikara and the kapyari for labor in the monasteries and approved building separate quarters for them. Schopen interprets the term dasa as servants, while he interprets the kalpikara and kapyari as bondmen and slave respectively because they can be owned and given by laity to the Buddhist monastic community. According to Schopen, since these passages are not found in Indian versions of the manuscripts, but found in a Sri Lankan version, these sections may have been later interpolations that reflect a Sri Lankan tradition, rather than early Indian. The discussion of servants and bonded labor is also found in manuscripts found in Tibet, though the details vary. The discussion of servant, bonded labor and slaves, states Scopen, differs significantly in different manuscripts discovered for the same Buddhist text in India, Nepal and Tibet, whether they are in Sanskrit or Pali language. These Buddhist manuscripts present a set of questions to ask a person who wants to become a monk or nun. These questions inquire if the person is a dasa and dasi, but also ask additional questions such as "are you ahrtaka" and "are you vikritaka". The later questions have been interpreted in two ways. As "are you one who has been seized" (ahrtaka) and "are you one who has been sold" (vikritaka) respectively, these terms are interpreted as slaves. Alternatively, they have also been interpreted as "are you doubtless" and "are you blameworthy" respectively, which does not mean slave. Further, according to these texts, Buddhist monasteries refused all servants, bonded labor and slaves an opportunity to become a monk or nun, but accepted them as workers to serve the monastery. The Indian texts discuss dasa and bonded labor along with their rights, as well as a monastic community's obligations to feed, clothe and provide medical aid to them in exchange for their work. This description of rights and duties in Buddhist Vinaya texts, says Schopen, parallel those found in Hindu Dharmasutra and Dharmasastra texts. The Buddhist attitude to servitude or slavery as reflected in Buddhist texts, states Schopen, may reflect a "passive acceptance" of cultural norms of the Brahmanical society midst them, or more "justifiably an active support" of these institutions. The Buddhist texts offer "no hint of protest or reform" to such institutions, according to Schopen. Kautilya's Arthashastra dedicates the thirteenth chapter on dasas, in his third book on law. This Sanskrit document from the Maurya Empire period (4th century BCE) has been translated by several authors, each in a different manner. Shamasastry's translation of 1915 maps dasa as slave, while Kangle leaves the words as dasa and karmakara. According to Kangle's interpretation, the verse 13.65.3-4 of Arthasastra forbids any slavery of "an Arya in any circumstances whatsoever", but allows the Mlecchas to "sell an offspring or keep it as pledge". Patrick Olivelle agrees with this interpretation. He adds that an Arya or Arya family could pledge itself during times of distress into bondage, and these bonded individuals could be converted to slave if they committed a crime thereby differing with Kangle's interpretation. According to Kangle, the Arthasastra forbids enslavement of minors and Arya from all four varnas and this inclusion of Shudras stands different from the Vedic literature. Kangle suggests that the context and rights granted to dasa by Kautilya implies that the word had a different meaning than the modern word slave, as well as the meaning of the word slave in Greek or other ancient and medieval civilizations. According to Arthashastra, anyone who had been found guilty of nishpatitah (ruined, bankrupt, a minor crime) may mortgage oneself to become dasa for someone willing to pay his or her bail and employ the dasa for money and privileges. The term dasa in Indic literature when used as a suffix to a bhagavan (deity) name, refers to a pious devotee. The Buddhist Vanijja Sutta, AN 5:177 listing slave trading to be one of the five wrong livelihood a layperson should not engage in : "Monks, a lay follower should not engage in five types of business. Which five? Business in weapons, business in human beings, business in meat, business in intoxicants, and business in poison. These are the five types of business that a lay follower should not engage in." Late classical Hindu Dharmaśāstra, would specify who can be enslaved, the treatment of enslaved, and acceptable forms of Vishti (forced labour), by caste; a theme later medieval commentaries, of the like of Devaṇabhaṭṭa's Smṛticandrikā, would refine.

Conditional bias... You guys are desperate...

Yes we want ALBARUNI to get back and expose Tunnis😂😂

@@spectrum1548 wow glad to see someone who knows about the word "tunni" here ❤️ Huge fan of harris and ghalib...

this school of thought is latterly rejected by most archeologist and historians. get over it now!

Then maybe you should dig deep into Islam and prove everyone in the world wrong you'll be the first one cox no one since now could prove islam wrong go ahead um encouraging you go ahead lad!!!

@@sumasurm9638 he loves his life broo. He don't want to dir

true , i agree . he might lose a lot of followers and subscribers in a moment if he states something wrong or provoking to other religions

@@sumasurm9638 because whole islam is based on false things .

@@ShubhamGupta-hg9md badi badi baatein vada pav khate 😂😂😂 Prove it!!!

see i respect your views as a fellow human, but please do more research.

Yes, like Madrasas teach flat earth theory!

@@souravjena1 aashram chaap spread out ka matlab samajh le

The number of ex Hindu is more than ex Muslim...so mind it

@@nishanekhudahnehal4782 way higher, every Indian friend I have here in the U.S. of hindu background is an atheist but they just hide it from their families, they tell me some crazy stories lol

@@nishanekhudahnehal4782 which is not a problem honestly because in the end we are judged for our actions and same for our consequences. Our God doesn't care that we believe in them or not. Our salvation or mukti as we call it is based solely and solely on our actions. We can be a great devotee but if stinky actions you are pooped.

@@nishanekhudahnehal4782 we don't behead them if they became ex hindus just like Muhammad did

@@_________---------______we6315 brainwashed kiddos 😂

Shi pakde he

yes why is he hesitant in everything 🙄

@@mohammedazamlari5661 because people don't want to listen the truth

True. Neeraj Atri bilkul saaf bolte hain. History ko history ki tarah batana jaroori hai na ki log kya sochenge, log kya kahenge ka cover chadha ke bolna.

@@Jo_Sara who's this guy??