While I do agree wandering traders need buffs, The villager nerfs are unique and justified, so I don’t agree wholeheartedly.

@@benevolence4246I changed my comment to make it better

The villager nerf includes the wandering trader buff

I hope they remove mending from villagers.. mending should be rare

The new wandering trader trades in the experimental thingie are so good! Since you can actually sell things to them you can also buy things without having to trade with villagers to get emeralds

Yeah I mean it’s been over 6 months already 😵‍💫

Not only that, but they haven't announced the update's name

I feel like its coming out sooner then usually

Same people who said they're never adding bodily fluids, but then made llamas spit at you

not that big of a deal tbh

Most players agree that the nerf is needed, specially for Mending. If Mojang gives us a practical way to guide or move villagers (the biggest pain point) the changes would be approved by the playerbase.

@@munyxxi they gotta add a party system.,. you can recruit villagers to follow you, maybe using hero of the village or an item gained from raids? And you just tell them to follow you XD. that would be awesome. Maybe a villager banner that lets you lead a party, and you can place it and they will stay near it like a temporary village. IDK

I thought I was the only one.

It's not required to get mending, you guys just feel pressured to get the "best gear" or something just because it's possible.

That’s… how it works…

@@GoldenSquideyno that’s just for now

​@@GoldenSquidey for EXPERIMENTAL

on both bedrock and java it's a toggle. On Java, one of the world creation tabs has an option for experiments, and you can just turn them on in world creation (even in non-snapshot). I don't fully know how it works on bedrock, but I know it's very similar, just with a different section of the world creation screen

It can become a problem if for every update they need to take in consideration both the pre nerf version and the post nerf, you basically need to update 4 different games at that point

This! I don't think they really comprehend the effort their players go through to set up a trading hall, and if they do, Microsoft doesn't seem to care about the experience

@@GlomusIridescens Trading halls are easy to make and they're insanely broken, they have every reason to be nerfed

@@EmperorPenguin1217 No, it's wrong to mess this up.

​@@EmperorPenguin1217Then tell me how to easily set up a trading hall?

That's just bedrock problem, which device do you play on

Where

where?

Where?

The replys to the guy with the pvz sunflower pfp

@@CatWithALime the replies haven't loaded by the time it cuts away

Agreed, I think your idea would work really nicely. I like some of the new soundtracks (namely, the Nether Update tracks) but I feel like most of the following ones are pretty detached from the world of Minecraft and feel forced (especially the tracks that Kumi Tanioka made for Caves and Cliffs, even though otherwise she is a great musician). Hopefully they add some sort of music/soundtrack toggle soon.

personally im not a fan of the new music, i like the old pieces so much more, idk what genius decided to fire the man who originally made the music for minecraft but they should be fired😂

I know, and im a big fan for minecraft since it came out in 2011

Just cuz mojang & youtubers can play this game all day long doesn't mean we all can. The rest of us have school jobs children, lives. I seriously hope they don't mess with villagers it'll ruin a amazing update

@@jameswesten2018 KZfaqrs can't constantly play mc either, villagers are still insanely broken and should be nerfed

@@EmperorPenguin1217 a lotta people think they should have it be an option you can toggle on or off.

@@EmperorPenguin1217 Villagers are a different way of progressing. It takes a similar amount of resources, time, risk, and effort. Even if you do get a villager to max level, their prices will constantly fluctuate. Villagers aren't guaranteed to live forever until late game, and at that point you earned it. If villager trades become biome dependent, it will take so much more time, effort, and risk just to get 1 set of trades that are still not guaranteed to last. It would cut off a branch of progression, which makes the game less varying, more samey, and consequencely lose a lot of players.

Evergreen is literally the snowy taiga. And the cherry grove was last update.

No I disagree in reality the most plain biome imo is the desert, we need an update that adds more life to it, like palm trees, coconuts, meerkat, and natural cammal spawns, villages shouldn't spawn cammals only.

We need Walmart biome

@@jaybuck9124 agreed my freind

Eye Eye caption

Even just seeing Tomasso Checci tweeting out teasers was great

​@@ZhenmoronThat was the best. Especially when he posted stuff like the pistons pushing chests or the new uses for cauldrons.

Oh yeah oops idk why it's done that 🙃

Works for me, I was thinking maybe have rare powerful items like nether stars be able to be sold to villagers for a hefty amount of emeralds. As far as new foods go I don’t think any are necessary since there’s already a ton of foods that are pretty much unused Maybe dragons breath depending on the price

Ok but Trial Chambers

@@LILAC_CHAOS Trial chambers are mid and don't have much incentive to go back there except for the wind charges which don't even require the vault

A) according to the video, the villager trade rebalance will not be coming in 1.21. B) no.

@@cornbreadbutcringey5723 alr Thats Great too hear

I think so! twitter.com/minecraft/status/1781055627281760275?s=46&t=lrM2j76TzxwT77MTuiabkg

the villager trade rebalance is not yet a proper part of the game. it is locked behind an 'experimental' toggle.

Agree. If anything the villager “nerf” is a buff because it reduces RNG for getting mending

Or just be clear that it *is* going to happen and that this is the time for the players to help them figure out how to implement it. Anything more constructive than “I hate it. Don’t do it.” Like, they’re asking for our insight and all they’re getting is complaints. Moving villagers is a pain. Like, seriously painful. Getting them to swamps and jungles is going to be more of a pain than getting mending is worth to me. And building a village in both of those biomes sounds fun af! In bedrock, iron farms require a lot of villagers. Small issue tho, that one bc u don’t *need* a trading hall for an iron farm but since they’re already working on parity why not mention it to them. Also, on bedrock if a villager is stuck on a chunk border it may just disappear. Rare. But it does happen. Not saying they can’t drop it as is and address these issues later but giving them feedback that these issues would affect gameplay with those changes is useful for both them and us. Honestly just a slightly easier way to move villagers would probably be perfect for me. But I have no clue how’d they’d do that. I do not envy them. We are wasting our chance tho to address concerns we come across.

or never release it because no one likes it? releasing it earlier would just spoil 1.21 and cause a rift in the community

i think it should stay an experiment forever for those who want it